Add authority/canon framework and archive Heiser Enoch early church transcript

frameworks/authority_canon_and_use/CLAIMS_LEDGER.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
+claims:
+  - id: ACU-001
+    title: "Quotation does not automatically imply canonicity"
+    status: active
+    importance: high
+
+  - id: ACU-002
+    title: "A non-canonical work may still be interpretively important"
+    status: active
+    importance: high
+
+  - id: ACU-003
+    title: "Early Christians disagreed about the scriptural status of 1 Enoch"
+    status: active
+    importance: high
+
+  - id: ACU-004
+    title: "Peter and Jude's use of Enoch establishes importance, not necessarily canonicity"
+    status: active
+    importance: high

frameworks/authority_canon_and_use/INDEX.md

@@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ This framework studies the distinction between:
 - inspiration
 - authority
 - usefulness
-- dependence
 - quotation
+- dependence
 - conceptual inheritance
 
 It exists to prevent the research portfolio from collapsing all source relationships into a single category.
@@ -17,11 +17,11 @@ It exists to prevent the research portfolio from collapsing all source relations
 
 A text does not need to be canonical to be:
 - important
-- authoritative in some limited sense
-- conceptually formative
+- influential
 - interpretively necessary
+- conceptually formative
 - used by biblical writers
 
 ## Current supporting sources
 
-- Heiser, "The Book of Enoch in the Early Church"
+- `sources/transcripts/heiser/nbp_093_book_of_enoch_in_the_early_church/`

frameworks/authority_canon_and_use/NOTES.md

@@ -8,10 +8,17 @@
 - Heiser's position is that canonicity is not required for interpretive usefulness.
 - Peter and Jude's use of Enoch does not automatically settle canon, but it does settle importance.
 
-## Use in portfolio
+## Why this framework is necessary
 
-This framework should support:
-- Enoch authority articles
+Without this framework, the portfolio will repeatedly re-argue basic distinctions:
+- canon vs usefulness
+- inspiration vs interpretive importance
+- quotation vs canonical endorsement
+- acceptance vs theological utility
+
+## Likely reuse targets
+
+- articles on Enoch and the New Testament
 - canon discussions
-- NT dependence discussions
-- anti-flattening methodology
+- authority discussions
+- methodology sections in longer books

frameworks/authority_canon_and_use/SOURCES.md

@@ -1,15 +1,19 @@
 # Sources
 
-## Core sources
+## Core source folders
 
-- Michael Heiser, "The Book of Enoch in the Early Church"
-- James C. VanderKam on Enoch in early Christianity
-- Nickelsburg on knowledge of Enoch and the Watchers story
-- Primary texts: Jude, 2 Peter, Barnabas, Tertullian, Origen, Irenaeus
+- `sources/transcripts/heiser/nbp_093_book_of_enoch_in_the_early_church/`
+
+## Key supporting figures and works
+
+- Michael S. Heiser, "The Book of Enoch in the Early Church"
+- James C. VanderKam on Enoch in early Christian literature
+- Nickelsburg on Enoch and the Watchers story
+- Primary texts: Jude, 2 Peter, Barnabas, Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Tertullian, Origen
 
 ## Core questions
 
-- Must quotation imply canonicity?
+- Does quotation imply canonicity?
 - Can a non-canonical text still be interpretively indispensable?
 - How did early Christians distinguish usefulness from Scripture?
 - How should Peter and Jude's use of Enoch be classified?

sources/transcripts/heiser/nbp_093_book_of_enoch_in_the_early_church/notes.md

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+# Notes
+
+## Why this source matters
+
+This is a framework source, not merely another transcript.
+
+It is especially useful for:
+- early church reception of 1 Enoch
+- the distinction between canon and usefulness
+- how Peter and Jude relate to Enoch
+- why non-canonical works can still be interpretively important
+- how early Christian writers handled Enoch differently
+
+## Strong themes
+
+- early Christians knew 1 Enoch well
+- some treated it as Scripture
+- many did not
+- this disagreement did not make either side "not Christian"
+- quoting a source does not automatically make it canonical
+- usefulness and canonicity are not the same category
+
+## Portfolio role
+
+This source should feed:
+- frameworks/authority_canon_and_use/
+- frameworks/second_temple_context/
+- future articles on Enoch in the early church

sources/transcripts/heiser/nbp_093_book_of_enoch_in_the_early_church/source.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+source_type: transcript
+platform: podcast
+series: "The Naked Bible Podcast 2.0"
+episode_number: 93
+title: "The Book of Enoch in the Early Church"
+speaker:
+  - "Michael S. Heiser"
+host:
+  - "Trey Stricklin"
+date: "2016-03-28"
+origin_label: "Naked Bible Podcast"
+topic_bins:
+  primary:
+    - "authority_canon_and_use"
+  secondary:
+    - "early_church_reception"
+    - "enoch_reception_history"
+    - "second_temple_context"
+    - "watchers_story"
+enoch_relevance: "direct_high"
+assets:
+  transcript_pdf: "transcript.pdf"
+  transcript_txt: "transcript.txt"
+status:
+  transcript_acquired: true
+  transcript_reviewed: true
+  claims_extracted: false
+notes:
+  - "Important framework source on early Christian reception of 1 Enoch."
+  - "Useful for distinguishing canon, inspiration, and interpretive importance."

sources/transcripts/heiser/nbp_093_book_of_enoch_in_the_early_church/topics.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+primary:
+  - authority_canon_and_use
+secondary:
+  - early_church_reception
+  - enoch_reception_history
+  - second_temple_context
+  - watchers_story
+  - new_testament_use_of_enoch
+enoch_relevance: direct_high
+notes:
+  - "Core source for canon/use distinction in Enoch debates."

sources/transcripts/heiser/nbp_093_book_of_enoch_in_the_early_church/transcript.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+The Naked Bible Podcast 2.0
+Number 93
+"The Book of Enoch in the Early Church"
+Dr. Michael S. Heiser
+With
+Residential Layman
+Trey Stricklin
+March 28, 2016
+
+[WORKING NOTE]
+This file should be replaced or expanded with a cleaner full text extraction from the PDF when convenient.
+
+Core themes already identified:
+- Early Christians knew 1 Enoch well
+- Debate over whether 1 Enoch should be considered inspired / Scripture
+- Ethiopia as the major canonical exception
+- Peter and Jude use Enochian material
+- Some early church figures treated Enoch as Scripture
+- Heiser's own view: canonicity is not required for usefulness or interpretive importance

topics/authority_canon_and_use/INDEX.md

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+# Topic Index
+
+| Speaker | Source | Video ID | Title | Relevance | Path |
+|---|---|---|---|---|---|

topics/second_temple_context/INDEX.md

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+# Topic Index
+
+| Speaker | Source | Video ID | Title | Relevance | Path |
+|---|---|---|---|---|---|