diff --git a/frameworks/authority_canon_and_use/CLAIMS_LEDGER.yaml b/frameworks/authority_canon_and_use/CLAIMS_LEDGER.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c472edd --- /dev/null +++ b/frameworks/authority_canon_and_use/CLAIMS_LEDGER.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ +claims: + - id: ACU-001 + title: "Quotation does not automatically imply canonicity" + status: active + importance: high + + - id: ACU-002 + title: "A non-canonical work may still be interpretively important" + status: active + importance: high + + - id: ACU-003 + title: "Early Christians disagreed about the scriptural status of 1 Enoch" + status: active + importance: high + + - id: ACU-004 + title: "Peter and Jude's use of Enoch establishes importance, not necessarily canonicity" + status: active + importance: high diff --git a/frameworks/authority_canon_and_use/INDEX.md b/frameworks/authority_canon_and_use/INDEX.md index afc77f4..c7d49ff 100644 --- a/frameworks/authority_canon_and_use/INDEX.md +++ b/frameworks/authority_canon_and_use/INDEX.md @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ This framework studies the distinction between: - inspiration - authority - usefulness -- dependence - quotation +- dependence - conceptual inheritance It exists to prevent the research portfolio from collapsing all source relationships into a single category. @@ -17,11 +17,11 @@ It exists to prevent the research portfolio from collapsing all source relations A text does not need to be canonical to be: - important -- authoritative in some limited sense -- conceptually formative +- influential - interpretively necessary +- conceptually formative - used by biblical writers ## Current supporting sources -- Heiser, "The Book of Enoch in the Early Church" +- `sources/transcripts/heiser/nbp_093_book_of_enoch_in_the_early_church/` diff --git a/frameworks/authority_canon_and_use/NOTES.md b/frameworks/authority_canon_and_use/NOTES.md index 80b1499..4ddedc1 100644 --- a/frameworks/authority_canon_and_use/NOTES.md +++ b/frameworks/authority_canon_and_use/NOTES.md @@ -8,10 +8,17 @@ - Heiser's position is that canonicity is not required for interpretive usefulness. - Peter and Jude's use of Enoch does not automatically settle canon, but it does settle importance. -## Use in portfolio +## Why this framework is necessary -This framework should support: -- Enoch authority articles +Without this framework, the portfolio will repeatedly re-argue basic distinctions: +- canon vs usefulness +- inspiration vs interpretive importance +- quotation vs canonical endorsement +- acceptance vs theological utility + +## Likely reuse targets + +- articles on Enoch and the New Testament - canon discussions -- NT dependence discussions -- anti-flattening methodology +- authority discussions +- methodology sections in longer books diff --git a/frameworks/authority_canon_and_use/SOURCES.md b/frameworks/authority_canon_and_use/SOURCES.md index fef39d5..1f5cf02 100644 --- a/frameworks/authority_canon_and_use/SOURCES.md +++ b/frameworks/authority_canon_and_use/SOURCES.md @@ -1,15 +1,19 @@ # Sources -## Core sources +## Core source folders -- Michael Heiser, "The Book of Enoch in the Early Church" -- James C. VanderKam on Enoch in early Christianity -- Nickelsburg on knowledge of Enoch and the Watchers story -- Primary texts: Jude, 2 Peter, Barnabas, Tertullian, Origen, Irenaeus +- `sources/transcripts/heiser/nbp_093_book_of_enoch_in_the_early_church/` + +## Key supporting figures and works + +- Michael S. Heiser, "The Book of Enoch in the Early Church" +- James C. VanderKam on Enoch in early Christian literature +- Nickelsburg on Enoch and the Watchers story +- Primary texts: Jude, 2 Peter, Barnabas, Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Tertullian, Origen ## Core questions -- Must quotation imply canonicity? +- Does quotation imply canonicity? - Can a non-canonical text still be interpretively indispensable? - How did early Christians distinguish usefulness from Scripture? - How should Peter and Jude's use of Enoch be classified? diff --git a/sources/transcripts/heiser/nbp_093_book_of_enoch_in_the_early_church/notes.md b/sources/transcripts/heiser/nbp_093_book_of_enoch_in_the_early_church/notes.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3d2f208 --- /dev/null +++ b/sources/transcripts/heiser/nbp_093_book_of_enoch_in_the_early_church/notes.md @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +# Notes + +## Why this source matters + +This is a framework source, not merely another transcript. + +It is especially useful for: +- early church reception of 1 Enoch +- the distinction between canon and usefulness +- how Peter and Jude relate to Enoch +- why non-canonical works can still be interpretively important +- how early Christian writers handled Enoch differently + +## Strong themes + +- early Christians knew 1 Enoch well +- some treated it as Scripture +- many did not +- this disagreement did not make either side "not Christian" +- quoting a source does not automatically make it canonical +- usefulness and canonicity are not the same category + +## Portfolio role + +This source should feed: +- frameworks/authority_canon_and_use/ +- frameworks/second_temple_context/ +- future articles on Enoch in the early church diff --git a/sources/transcripts/heiser/nbp_093_book_of_enoch_in_the_early_church/source.yaml b/sources/transcripts/heiser/nbp_093_book_of_enoch_in_the_early_church/source.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..596b2af --- /dev/null +++ b/sources/transcripts/heiser/nbp_093_book_of_enoch_in_the_early_church/source.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +source_type: transcript +platform: podcast +series: "The Naked Bible Podcast 2.0" +episode_number: 93 +title: "The Book of Enoch in the Early Church" +speaker: + - "Michael S. Heiser" +host: + - "Trey Stricklin" +date: "2016-03-28" +origin_label: "Naked Bible Podcast" +topic_bins: + primary: + - "authority_canon_and_use" + secondary: + - "early_church_reception" + - "enoch_reception_history" + - "second_temple_context" + - "watchers_story" +enoch_relevance: "direct_high" +assets: + transcript_pdf: "transcript.pdf" + transcript_txt: "transcript.txt" +status: + transcript_acquired: true + transcript_reviewed: true + claims_extracted: false +notes: + - "Important framework source on early Christian reception of 1 Enoch." + - "Useful for distinguishing canon, inspiration, and interpretive importance." diff --git a/sources/transcripts/heiser/nbp_093_book_of_enoch_in_the_early_church/topics.yaml b/sources/transcripts/heiser/nbp_093_book_of_enoch_in_the_early_church/topics.yaml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a4c58e1 --- /dev/null +++ b/sources/transcripts/heiser/nbp_093_book_of_enoch_in_the_early_church/topics.yaml @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +primary: + - authority_canon_and_use +secondary: + - early_church_reception + - enoch_reception_history + - second_temple_context + - watchers_story + - new_testament_use_of_enoch +enoch_relevance: direct_high +notes: + - "Core source for canon/use distinction in Enoch debates." diff --git a/sources/transcripts/heiser/nbp_093_book_of_enoch_in_the_early_church/transcript.pdf b/sources/transcripts/heiser/nbp_093_book_of_enoch_in_the_early_church/transcript.pdf new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b3fc670 Binary files /dev/null and b/sources/transcripts/heiser/nbp_093_book_of_enoch_in_the_early_church/transcript.pdf differ diff --git a/sources/transcripts/heiser/nbp_093_book_of_enoch_in_the_early_church/transcript.txt b/sources/transcripts/heiser/nbp_093_book_of_enoch_in_the_early_church/transcript.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..89aa126 --- /dev/null +++ b/sources/transcripts/heiser/nbp_093_book_of_enoch_in_the_early_church/transcript.txt @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +The Naked Bible Podcast 2.0 +Number 93 +"The Book of Enoch in the Early Church" +Dr. Michael S. Heiser +With +Residential Layman +Trey Stricklin +March 28, 2016 + +[WORKING NOTE] +This file should be replaced or expanded with a cleaner full text extraction from the PDF when convenient. + +Core themes already identified: +- Early Christians knew 1 Enoch well +- Debate over whether 1 Enoch should be considered inspired / Scripture +- Ethiopia as the major canonical exception +- Peter and Jude use Enochian material +- Some early church figures treated Enoch as Scripture +- Heiser's own view: canonicity is not required for usefulness or interpretive importance diff --git a/topics/authority_canon_and_use/INDEX.md b/topics/authority_canon_and_use/INDEX.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..32d9b4f --- /dev/null +++ b/topics/authority_canon_and_use/INDEX.md @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ +# Topic Index + +| Speaker | Source | Video ID | Title | Relevance | Path | +|---|---|---|---|---|---| diff --git a/topics/second_temple_context/INDEX.md b/topics/second_temple_context/INDEX.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..32d9b4f --- /dev/null +++ b/topics/second_temple_context/INDEX.md @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ +# Topic Index + +| Speaker | Source | Video ID | Title | Relevance | Path | +|---|---|---|---|---|---|