forked from jsnbuchanan/crowd-funder-for-time-pwa
feat(cursor): add research diagnostic workflow and format base context rules
- Add comprehensive R&D workflow rules for pre-implementation research and defect investigation - Format base context rules for better readability and line length compliance - Include evidence-first investigation templates and collaboration hooks
This commit is contained in:
135
.cursor/rules/research_diagnostic.mdc
Normal file
135
.cursor/rules/research_diagnostic.mdc
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
description: Use this workflow when doing **pre-implementation research, defect investigations with uncertain repros, or clarifying system architecture and behaviors**.
|
||||
alwaysApply: false
|
||||
---
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"coaching_level": "light",
|
||||
"socratic_max_questions": 2,
|
||||
"verbosity": "concise",
|
||||
"timebox_minutes": null,
|
||||
"format_enforcement": "strict"
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
# Research & Diagnostic Workflow (R&D)
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
Provide a **repeatable, evidence-first** workflow to investigate features and
|
||||
defects **before coding**. Outputs are concise reports, hypotheses, and next
|
||||
steps—**not** code changes.
|
||||
|
||||
## When to Use
|
||||
|
||||
- Pre-implementation research for new features
|
||||
- Defect investigations (repros uncertain, user-specific failures)
|
||||
- Architecture/behavior clarifications (e.g., auth flows, merges, migrations)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Output Contract (strict)
|
||||
|
||||
1) **Objective** — 1–2 lines
|
||||
2) **System Map (if helpful)** — short diagram or bullet flow (≤8 bullets)
|
||||
3) **Findings (Evidence-linked)** — bullets; each with file/function refs
|
||||
4) **Hypotheses & Failure Modes** — short list, each testable
|
||||
5) **Corrections** — explicit deltas from earlier assumptions (if any)
|
||||
6) **Diagnostics** — what to check next (logs, DB, env, repro steps)
|
||||
7) **Risks & Scope** — what could break; affected components
|
||||
8) **Decision/Next Steps** — what we’ll do, who’s involved, by when
|
||||
9) **References** — code paths, ADRs, docs
|
||||
10) **Competence & Collaboration Hooks** — brief, skimmable
|
||||
|
||||
> Keep total length lean. Prefer links and bullets over prose.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Quickstart Template
|
||||
|
||||
Copy/paste and fill:
|
||||
|
||||
```md
|
||||
# Investigation — <short title>
|
||||
|
||||
## Objective
|
||||
<one or two lines>
|
||||
|
||||
## System Map
|
||||
- <module> → <function> → <downstream>
|
||||
- <data path> → <db table> → <api>
|
||||
|
||||
## Findings (Evidence)
|
||||
- <claim> — evidence: `src/path/file.ts:function` (lines X–Y); log snippet/trace id
|
||||
- <claim> — evidence: `...`
|
||||
|
||||
## Hypotheses & Failure Modes
|
||||
- H1: <hypothesis>; would fail when <condition>
|
||||
- H2: <hypothesis>; watch for <signal>
|
||||
|
||||
## Corrections
|
||||
- Updated: <old statement> → <new statement with evidence>
|
||||
|
||||
## Diagnostics (Next Checks)
|
||||
- [ ] Repro on <platform/version>
|
||||
- [ ] Inspect <table/store> for <record>
|
||||
- [ ] Capture <log/trace>
|
||||
|
||||
## Risks & Scope
|
||||
- Impacted: <areas/components>; Data: <tables/keys>; Users: <segments>
|
||||
|
||||
## Decision / Next Steps
|
||||
- Owner: <name>; By: <date> (YYYY-MM-DD)
|
||||
- Action: <spike/bugfix/ADR>; Exit criteria: <binary checks>
|
||||
|
||||
## References
|
||||
- `src/...`
|
||||
- ADR: `docs/adr/xxxx-yy-zz-something.md`
|
||||
- Design: `docs/...`
|
||||
|
||||
## Competence Hooks
|
||||
- Why this works: <≤3 bullets>
|
||||
- Common pitfalls: <≤3 bullets>
|
||||
- Next skill: <≤1 item>
|
||||
- Teach-back: "<one question>"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Evidence Quality Bar
|
||||
|
||||
- **Cite the source** (file:func, line range if possible).
|
||||
- **Prefer primary evidence** (code, logs) over inference.
|
||||
- **Disambiguate platform** (Web/Capacitor/Electron) and **state** (migration, auth).
|
||||
- **Note uncertainty** explicitly.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Collaboration Hooks
|
||||
|
||||
- **Syncs:** 10–15m with QA/Security/Platform owners for high-risk areas.
|
||||
- **ADR:** Record major decisions; link here.
|
||||
- **Review:** Share repro + diagnostics checklist in PR/issue.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Self-Check (model, before responding)
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Output matches the **Output Contract** sections.
|
||||
- [ ] Each claim has **evidence** or **uncertainty** is flagged.
|
||||
- [ ] Hypotheses are testable; diagnostics are actionable.
|
||||
- [ ] Competence + collaboration hooks present (≤120 words total).
|
||||
- [ ] Respect toggles; keep it concise.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Optional Globs (examples)
|
||||
|
||||
> Uncomment `globs` in the header if you want auto-attach behavior.
|
||||
|
||||
- `src/platforms/**`, `src/services/**` — attach during service/feature investigations
|
||||
- `docs/adr/**` — attach when editing ADRs
|
||||
|
||||
## Referenced Files
|
||||
|
||||
- Consider including templates as context: `@adr_template.md`, `@investigation_report_example.md`
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user