You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
 
 
 
 
 
 

8.6 KiB

Migration 004 Complexity Resolution Plan

Document Version: 1.3
Author: Matthew Raymer
Date: 2025-01-27
Status: Implementation Phase - Phase 1 Complete

Problem Summary

The current migration 004 implementation has become overly complex with multiple critical issues that create serious risks for data integrity and application performance.

Four Most Critical Issues

  1. Duplicate SQL Definitions: Migration 004 SQL exists in three separate locations (main sql field, statements array, recovery logic), making it impossible to ensure all users run identical statements.

  2. Non-Atomic Execution: Individual statements continue executing even if earlier statements fail, causing partial data migration and potential data loss.

  3. Incorrect Database Result Handling: Code assumes PlatformService abstraction format when called directly from raw database services, causing runtime errors.

  4. Duplicate Execution Risk: Recovery logic could re-run statements that already executed successfully, leading to data corruption.

Resolution Principles

Guiding Principle: All migrations must execute from a single SQL source in the MIGRATIONS array, as one atomic statement.

  • Single Source of Truth: Only one place defines migration SQL
  • Atomic Operations: Migration succeeds completely or fails completely
  • Database Agnostic: Result handling works with any database service
  • Minimal Overhead: No unnecessary logging or validation
  • Simple Recovery: If migration fails, it should be obvious and fixable

Implementation Phases

Phase 1: Simplify Migration Definition COMPLETED

Objective: Establish single source of truth for migration SQL

Actions:

  • Remove statements array from migration 004 definition
  • Keep only the single sql field as the authoritative source
  • Remove all recovery logic that duplicates SQL statements
  • Ensure migration SQL is self-contained and atomic

Deliverables:

  • Clean migration definition with single SQL source
  • Removed duplicate SQL definitions
  • Eliminated recovery logic complexity

Phase 2: Fix Database Result Handling COMPLETED

Objective: Make result handling database-agnostic

Actions:

  • Remove DatabaseResult type assumptions from migration code
  • Implement proper result extraction based on actual database service
  • Use the extractMigrationNames function pattern consistently
  • Make result handling work with any database service implementation
  • Normalize results from AbsurdSqlDatabaseService and CapacitorPlatformService into shared internal format

Deliverables:

  • Database-agnostic result handling
  • Consistent result extraction across all database services
  • Removed type casting assumptions
  • Shared internal result format for all database services

Phase 3: Ensure Atomic Execution COMPLETED

Objective: Guarantee migration succeeds completely or fails completely

Actions:

  • Modify migration service to execute single SQL block only
  • Remove individual statement execution logic
  • Implement proper error handling that prevents partial execution
  • Ensure migration tracking is accurate
  • Provide explicit rollback/restore instructions for migration failures
  • Ensure migration logs indicate failure cause and required operator action

Deliverables:

  • Atomic migration execution
  • Proper error handling
  • Accurate migration tracking
  • Clear recovery procedures

Phase 4: Remove Excessive Debugging COMPLETED

Objective: Eliminate performance overhead from debugging code

Actions:

  • Remove detailed logging that slows startup
  • Keep only essential error logging
  • Remove complex validation logic that runs on every startup
  • Move debugging code to test page or development-only mode

Deliverables:

  • Faster application startup
  • Cleaner production code
  • Debugging available only when needed

Phase 5: Testing & Validation

Objective: Ensure simplified migration works correctly

Actions:

  • Test migration execution with different database services
  • Verify no duplicate execution occurs
  • Confirm proper error handling
  • Validate data integrity after migration
  • Test rollback/restore scenarios to confirm system recovery paths
  • Test edge cases: empty database, partially migrated database, already-migrated database
  • Test concurrency scenarios (multiple app instances/migrations starting simultaneously)
  • Test cross-platform/device differences (SQLite, AbsurdSQL, Capacitor DB adapters)

Deliverables:

  • Working migration system
  • No duplicate execution
  • Proper error handling
  • Data integrity maintained
  • Validated recovery procedures
  • Edge case coverage confirmed
  • Documented test results as artifacts for future regression testing

Performance & Debugging

Current Issue: Excessive logging and validation code runs on every app startup, slowing application performance.

Solution:

  • Debugging/logging is acceptable in development/test environments
  • Production startup must not be slowed by migration debugging
  • Move complex validation to test page or development-only mode
  • Keep only essential error logging for production

Rollback & Recovery Procedures

Manual Rollback Steps

  1. Stop Application: Ensure no active database connections
  2. Restore Database: Use snapshot/backup to restore pre-migration state
  3. Clear Migration Tracking: Remove migration 004 entry from migrations table
  4. Verify State: Confirm active_identity table is removed and settings.activeDid is restored
  5. Restart Application: Test normal operation

Automated Rollback

  • Automated Detection: Migration service detects failure and triggers rollback
  • Database Restore: Automated restoration from pre-migration snapshot
  • Logging: Detailed rollback logs with failure cause and recovery actions
  • Validation: Automated verification of rollback success

Recovery Validation

  • Data Integrity Check: Verify all data is consistent with pre-migration state
  • Migration Status: Confirm migration tracking reflects correct state
  • Application Functionality: Test core features work correctly
  • Performance Baseline: Confirm startup performance matches pre-migration levels

Files Requiring Changes

Core Migration Files (Primary Changes)

  • src/db-sql/migration.ts - Remove duplicate SQL definitions, fix DatabaseResult usage, remove recovery logic
  • src/services/migrationService.ts - Remove individual statement execution, ensure atomic execution

Database Service Files (Result Handling Fixes)

  • src/services/AbsurdSqlDatabaseService.ts - Fix result extraction for migration queries
  • src/services/platforms/CapacitorPlatformService.ts - Fix result extraction for migration queries

Note: Verify all file paths match repository reality as part of CI validation.

Success Criteria

  • Migration 004 SQL defined in single location only
  • Migration executes atomically (all-or-nothing)
  • Database result handling works with all database services
  • No duplicate statement execution possible
  • Startup time reduced by at least 20% compared to pre-fix baseline (measured via cold app start profiling logs)
  • Migration tracking is accurate and reliable
  • Error handling is clear and actionable

Next Steps

  1. Review and Approve Plan: Get stakeholder approval for this approach
  2. Phase 1 Implementation: Begin with simplifying migration definition
  3. Testing: Validate each phase before proceeding
  4. Assign Migration Owner: Designate clear owner for future migration reviews
  5. Create Review Checklist: Define lightweight checklist (SQL duplication, atomicity, error handling) to prevent recurrence

Dependencies

  • Migration service architecture
  • Database service implementations
  • Testing infrastructure
  • Documentation system
  • Seed datasets or controlled test states for reproducible validation
  • Snapshot/restore utilities for rollback testing

Lessons Learned

Process Improvement Note: This migration complexity highlights the importance of closer review and consolidation of AI-generated code. Uncontrolled proliferation of generated logic leads to fragmentation, review fatigue, and system instability. Future development should prioritize:

  • Single source of truth for all critical logic
  • Atomic operations over complex multi-step processes
  • Regular consolidation and simplification of generated code
  • Clear ownership and review processes for migration logic

This document will be updated as the implementation progresses and new insights are gained.