Browse Source

docs(testing): update README with markdown compliance and project tracking

- Applies markdown formatting rules (80-character line limit, proper spacing)
- References new PROJECT_COVERAGE_TRACKING.md file
- Updates coverage metrics to reflect ShowAllCard addition
- Improves readability and formatting consistency
- Maintains comprehensive testing documentation
- Follows established documentation standards

Formatting: Markdown compliance applied
Content: Project tracking integration added
pull/153/head
Matthew Raymer 15 hours ago
parent
commit
75ddea4071
  1. 117
      src/test/README.md

117
src/test/README.md

@ -2,13 +2,13 @@
## Overview
This directory contains comprehensive unit tests for TimeSafari components using **Vitest** and
**JSDOM**. The testing infrastructure is designed to work with Vue 3 components using the
`vue-facing-decorator` pattern.
This directory contains comprehensive unit tests for TimeSafari components using
**Vitest** and **JSDOM**. The testing infrastructure is designed to work with
Vue 3 components using the `vue-facing-decorator` pattern.
## Current Coverage Status
### ✅ **100% Coverage Components** (5 components)
### ✅ **100% Coverage Components** (6 components)
| Component | Lines | Tests | Coverage |
|-----------|-------|-------|----------|
@ -17,19 +17,24 @@ This directory contains comprehensive unit tests for TimeSafari components using
| **ProjectIcon.vue** | 48 | 39 | 100% |
| **ContactBulkActions.vue** | 43 | 43 | 100% |
| **EntityIcon.vue** | 82 | 0* | 100% |
| **ShowAllCard.vue** | 66 | 52 | 100% |
*EntityIcon.vue has 100% coverage but no dedicated test file (covered by LargeIdenticonModal tests)
*EntityIcon.vue has 100% coverage but no dedicated test file (covered by
LargeIdenticonModal tests)
### 📊 **Coverage Metrics**
- **Total Tests**: 149 tests passing
- **Test Files**: 5 files
- **Components Covered**: 5 simple components
- **Mock Files**: 4 mock implementations
- **Overall Coverage**: 2.49% (focused on simple components)
- **Total Tests**: 201 tests passing
- **Test Files**: 6 files
- **Components Covered**: 6 simple components
- **Mock Files**: 7 mock implementations
- **Overall Coverage**: 3.24% (focused on simple components)
- **Test Categories**: 10 comprehensive categories
- **Enhanced Testing**: All simple components now have comprehensive test coverage
> **📋 Project Tracking**: For detailed coverage metrics, implementation progress, and
> project-specific status, see [`PROJECT_COVERAGE_TRACKING.md`](./PROJECT_COVERAGE_TRACKING.md)
## Testing Infrastructure
### **Core Technologies**
@ -40,12 +45,15 @@ This directory contains comprehensive unit tests for TimeSafari components using
- **TypeScript**: Full type safety for tests
### **Configuration Files**
- `vitest.config.ts` - Vitest configuration with JSDOM environment
- `src/test/setup.ts` - Global test setup and mocks
- `package.json` - Test scripts and dependencies
### **Global Mocks**
The test environment includes comprehensive mocks for browser APIs:
- `ResizeObserver` - For responsive component testing
- `IntersectionObserver` - For scroll-based components
- `localStorage` / `sessionStorage` - For data persistence
@ -55,6 +63,7 @@ The test environment includes comprehensive mocks for browser APIs:
## Test Patterns
### **1. Component Mounting**
```typescript
const mountComponent = (props = {}) => {
return mount(ComponentName, {
@ -67,6 +76,7 @@ const mountComponent = (props = {}) => {
```
### **2. Event Testing**
```typescript
it('should emit event when clicked', async () => {
wrapper = mountComponent()
@ -76,6 +86,7 @@ it('should emit event when clicked', async () => {
```
### **3. Prop Validation**
```typescript
it('should accept all required props', () => {
wrapper = mountComponent()
@ -84,6 +95,7 @@ it('should accept all required props', () => {
```
### **4. CSS Class Testing**
```typescript
it('should have correct CSS classes', () => {
wrapper = mountComponent()
@ -95,59 +107,70 @@ it('should have correct CSS classes', () => {
## Test Categories
### **Component Rendering**
- Component existence and structure
- Conditional rendering based on props
- Template structure validation
### **Component Styling**
- CSS class application
- Responsive design classes
- Tailwind CSS integration
### **Component Props**
- Required prop validation
- Optional prop handling
- Prop type checking
### **User Interactions**
- Click event handling
- Form input interactions
- Keyboard navigation
### **Component Methods**
- Method existence and functionality
- Return value validation
- Error handling
### **Edge Cases**
- Empty/null prop handling
- Rapid user interactions
- Component state changes
### **Accessibility**
- Semantic HTML structure
- ARIA attributes
- Keyboard navigation
### **Error Handling** ✅ **NEW**
- Invalid prop combinations
- Malformed data handling
- Graceful degradation
- Exception handling
### **Performance Testing** ✅ **NEW**
- Render time benchmarks
- Memory leak detection
- Rapid re-render efficiency
- Component cleanup validation
### **Integration Testing** ✅ **NEW**
- Parent-child component interaction
- Dependency injection testing
- Global property integration
- Service integration patterns
### **Snapshot Testing** ✅ **NEW**
- DOM structure validation
- CSS class regression detection
- Accessibility attribute consistency
@ -157,34 +180,49 @@ it('should have correct CSS classes', () => {
### **Defensive Programming Validation**
The primary purpose of our comprehensive error handling tests is to **prevent component and system failures** in real-world scenarios. Our testing philosophy focuses on:
The primary purpose of our comprehensive error handling tests is to **prevent
component and system failures** in real-world scenarios. Our testing philosophy
focuses on:
#### **1. Real-World Edge Case Protection**
- **Invalid API responses**: Test components when backend returns `null` instead of expected objects
- **Invalid API responses**: Test components when backend returns `null` instead
of expected objects
- **Network failures**: Verify graceful handling of missing or corrupted data
- **User input errors**: Test with malformed data, special characters, and extreme values
- **Concurrent operations**: Ensure stability during rapid state changes and simultaneous interactions
- **User input errors**: Test with malformed data, special characters, and
extreme values
- **Concurrent operations**: Ensure stability during rapid state changes and
simultaneous interactions
#### **2. System Stability Assurance**
- **Cascading failures**: Prevent one component's error from breaking the entire application
- **Cascading failures**: Prevent one component's error from breaking the
entire application
- **Memory leaks**: Ensure components clean up properly even when errors occur
- **Performance degradation**: Verify components remain responsive under error conditions
- **Performance degradation**: Verify components remain responsive under error
conditions
#### **3. Production Readiness**
- **User Experience Protection**: Users don't see blank screens or error messages
- **Developer Confidence**: Safe refactoring without fear of breaking edge cases
- **System Reliability**: Prevents one bad API response from crashing the entire app
- **User Experience Protection**: Users don't see blank screens or error
messages
- **Developer Confidence**: Safe refactoring without fear of breaking edge
cases
- **System Reliability**: Prevents one bad API response from crashing the
entire app
### **Comprehensive Error Scenarios**
Our error handling tests cover:
#### **RegistrationNotice Component Protection**
- Prevents crashes when `isRegistered` or `show` props are malformed
- Ensures the "Share Your Info" button still works even with invalid data
- Protects against rapid prop changes causing UI inconsistencies
#### **LargeIdenticonModal Component Protection**
- Prevents modal rendering with invalid contact data that could break the UI
- Ensures the close functionality works even with malformed contact objects
- Protects against EntityIcon component failures cascading to the modal
@ -192,6 +230,7 @@ Our error handling tests cover:
### **Error Testing Categories**
#### **Invalid Input Testing**
```typescript
// Test 10+ different invalid prop combinations
const invalidPropCombinations = [
@ -201,6 +240,7 @@ const invalidPropCombinations = [
```
#### **Malformed Data Testing**
```typescript
// Test various malformed data structures
const malformedData = [
@ -210,6 +250,7 @@ const malformedData = [
```
#### **Extreme Value Testing**
```typescript
// Test boundary conditions and extreme values
const extremeValues = [
@ -219,6 +260,7 @@ const extremeValues = [
```
#### **Concurrent Error Testing**
```typescript
// Test rapid changes with invalid data
for (let i = 0; i < 50; i++) {
@ -231,21 +273,25 @@ for (let i = 0; i < 50; i++) {
### **Benefits Beyond Coverage**
#### **1. Defensive Programming Validation**
- Components handle unexpected data gracefully
- No crashes or blank screens for users
- Proper error boundaries and fallbacks
#### **2. Real-World Resilience**
- Tested against actual failure scenarios
- Validated with realistic error conditions
- Proven stability under adverse conditions
#### **3. Developer Confidence**
- Safe to refactor and extend components
- Clear understanding of component behavior under stress
- Reduced debugging time for edge cases
#### **4. Production Stability**
- Reduced support tickets and user complaints
- Improved application reliability
- Better user experience under error conditions
@ -253,7 +299,9 @@ for (let i = 0; i < 50; i++) {
## Mock Implementation
### **Mock Component Structure**
Each mock component provides:
- Same interface as original component
- Simplified behavior for testing
- Helper methods for test scenarios
@ -262,6 +310,7 @@ Each mock component provides:
### **Mock Usage Examples**
#### **Direct Instantiation**
```typescript
import RegistrationNoticeMock from '@/test/__mocks__/RegistrationNotice.mock'
const mock = new RegistrationNoticeMock()
@ -269,6 +318,7 @@ expect(mock.shouldShow).toBe(true)
```
#### **Vue Test Utils Integration**
```typescript
import { mount } from '@vue/test-utils'
import RegistrationNoticeMock from '@/test/__mocks__/RegistrationNotice.mock'
@ -280,6 +330,7 @@ expect(wrapper.vm.shouldShow).toBe(true)
```
#### **Event Testing**
```typescript
const mock = new RegistrationNoticeMock()
mock.mockShareInfoClick()
@ -287,6 +338,7 @@ mock.mockShareInfoClick()
```
#### **Custom Mock Behavior**
```typescript
class CustomRegistrationNoticeMock extends RegistrationNoticeMock {
get shouldShow(): boolean {
@ -298,6 +350,7 @@ class CustomRegistrationNoticeMock extends RegistrationNoticeMock {
## Advanced Testing Patterns
### **Spy Methods**
```typescript
import { vi } from 'vitest'
@ -312,6 +365,7 @@ it('should call method when triggered', () => {
```
### **Integration Testing**
```typescript
it('should work with parent component', () => {
const parentWrapper = mount(ParentComponent, {
@ -327,6 +381,7 @@ it('should work with parent component', () => {
```
### **State Change Testing**
```typescript
it('should update state when props change', async () => {
wrapper = mountComponent({ show: false })
@ -338,6 +393,7 @@ it('should update state when props change', async () => {
```
### **Performance Testing**
```typescript
it('should render within acceptable time', () => {
const start = performance.now()
@ -351,6 +407,7 @@ it('should render within acceptable time', () => {
## Running Tests
### **Available Commands**
```bash
# Run all tests
npm run test:unit
@ -366,6 +423,7 @@ npm run test:unit src/test/RegistrationNotice.test.ts
```
### **Test Output**
- **Passing Tests**: Green checkmarks
- **Failing Tests**: Red X with detailed error messages
- **Coverage Report**: Percentage coverage for each file
@ -379,7 +437,10 @@ src/test/
│ ├── RegistrationNotice.mock.ts
│ ├── LargeIdenticonModal.mock.ts
│ ├── ProjectIcon.mock.ts
│ └── ContactBulkActions.mock.ts
│ ├── ContactBulkActions.mock.ts
│ ├── ImageViewer.mock.ts
│ ├── ShowAllCard.mock.ts # Mock with Simple/Standard/Complex levels
│ └── README.md # Mock usage documentation
├── utils/ # Centralized test utilities
│ ├── testHelpers.ts # Core test utilities
│ └── componentTestUtils.ts # Component testing utilities
@ -394,6 +455,7 @@ src/test/
├── LargeIdenticonModal.test.ts # Component tests
├── ProjectIcon.test.ts # Component tests
├── ContactBulkActions.test.ts # Component tests
├── ShowAllCard.test.ts # Component tests (52 tests, 100% coverage)
└── PlatformServiceMixin.test.ts # Utility tests
```
@ -435,6 +497,7 @@ const props = createTestProps({ show: false })
```
#### **Lifecycle Testing**
```typescript
import { testLifecycleEvents } from '@/test/utils/componentTestUtils'
@ -443,6 +506,7 @@ expect(results.every(r => r.success)).toBe(true)
```
#### **Computed Properties Testing**
```typescript
import { testComputedProperties } from '@/test/utils/componentTestUtils'
@ -451,6 +515,7 @@ expect(results.every(r => r.success)).toBe(true)
```
#### **Watcher Testing**
```typescript
import { testWatchers } from '@/test/utils/componentTestUtils'
@ -464,6 +529,7 @@ expect(results.every(r => r.success)).toBe(true)
```
#### **Performance Testing**
```typescript
import { testPerformance } from '@/test/utils/componentTestUtils'
@ -475,6 +541,7 @@ expect(result.passed).toBe(true)
```
#### **Accessibility Testing**
```typescript
import { testAccessibility } from '@/test/utils/componentTestUtils'
@ -490,6 +557,7 @@ expect(results.every(r => r.success && r.passed)).toBe(true)
```
#### **Error Handling Testing**
```typescript
import { testErrorHandling } from '@/test/utils/componentTestUtils'
@ -508,6 +576,7 @@ expect(results.every(r => r.success)).toBe(true)
```
#### **Event Listener Testing**
```typescript
import { createMockEventListeners } from '@/test/utils/componentTestUtils'
@ -518,18 +587,21 @@ expect(listeners.click).toBeDefined()
## Best Practices
### **Test Organization**
1. **Group related tests** using `describe` blocks
2. **Use descriptive test names** that explain the scenario
3. **Keep tests focused** on one specific behavior
4. **Use helper functions** for common setup
### **Mock Design**
1. **Maintain interface compatibility** with original components
2. **Provide helper methods** for common test scenarios
3. **Include computed properties** for state validation
4. **Document mock behavior** clearly
### **Coverage Goals**
1. **100% line coverage** for simple components
2. **100% branch coverage** for conditional logic
3. **100% function coverage** for all methods
@ -538,6 +610,7 @@ expect(listeners.click).toBeDefined()
## Future Improvements
### **Implemented Enhancements**
1. ✅ **Error handling** - Component error states and exception handling
2. ✅ **Performance testing** - Render time benchmarks and memory leak detection
3. ✅ **Integration testing** - Parent-child component interaction and dependency injection
@ -545,6 +618,7 @@ expect(listeners.click).toBeDefined()
5. ✅ **Accessibility compliance** - ARIA attributes and semantic structure validation
### **Future Enhancements**
1. **Visual regression testing** - Automated UI consistency checks
2. **Cross-browser compatibility** testing
3. **Service layer integration** testing
@ -552,6 +626,7 @@ expect(listeners.click).toBeDefined()
5. **Advanced performance** profiling
### **Coverage Expansion**
1. **Medium complexity components** (100-300 lines)
2. **Complex components** (300+ lines)
3. **Service layer testing**
@ -561,12 +636,14 @@ expect(listeners.click).toBeDefined()
## Troubleshooting
### **Common Issues**
1. **Import errors**: Check path aliases in `vitest.config.ts`
2. **Mock not found**: Verify mock file exists and exports correctly
3. **Test failures**: Check for timing issues with async operations
4. **Coverage gaps**: Add tests for uncovered code paths
### **Debug Tips**
1. **Use `console.log`** in tests for debugging
2. **Check test output** for detailed error messages
3. **Verify component props** are being passed correctly

Loading…
Cancel
Save