chore: removing extraneous documentation
This commit is contained in:
Matthew Raymer
@@ -1,232 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Contact Import Testing Implementation
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
|
||||
This document describes the comprehensive test suite implemented for Time Safari's
|
||||
contact import functionality. The tests cover all scenarios mentioned in the
|
||||
original TODO comment and provide thorough validation of the contact import feature.
|
||||
|
||||
## Test File: `45-contact-import.spec.ts`
|
||||
|
||||
### Test Coverage
|
||||
|
||||
The test suite covers all the requirements from the original TODO:
|
||||
|
||||
1. ✅ **Contact import via URL query parameters**
|
||||
- Single contact import: `/contact-import?contacts=[{"did":"did:example:123","name":"Alice"}]`
|
||||
- Multiple contacts import with proper encoding
|
||||
- URL parameter validation and error handling
|
||||
|
||||
2. ✅ **JWT import via URL path**
|
||||
- JWT token in URL: `/contact-import/[JWT_TOKEN]`
|
||||
- Deep link support: `/deep-link/contact-import/[JWT_TOKEN]`
|
||||
- JWT payload validation and parsing
|
||||
|
||||
3. ✅ **Manual JWT input via textarea**
|
||||
- Direct JWT string input
|
||||
- Raw contact data input
|
||||
- Input validation and error handling
|
||||
|
||||
4. ✅ **Duplicate contact detection and field comparison**
|
||||
- Existing contact detection
|
||||
- Field-by-field comparison display
|
||||
- Modified contact handling
|
||||
|
||||
5. ✅ **Error scenarios**
|
||||
- Invalid JWT format detection
|
||||
- Malformed contact data validation
|
||||
- Missing required fields handling
|
||||
- Wrong data types validation
|
||||
- Network error simulation
|
||||
|
||||
6. ✅ **Error logging verification**
|
||||
- Console error message validation
|
||||
- UI error message display verification
|
||||
- Error state handling
|
||||
|
||||
### Test Scenarios
|
||||
|
||||
#### Basic Import Tests
|
||||
|
||||
- **Single contact via URL**: Tests basic URL parameter import
|
||||
- **Multiple contacts via URL**: Tests bulk import functionality
|
||||
- **JWT path import**: Tests JWT token in URL path
|
||||
- **Deep link import**: Tests deep link redirect functionality
|
||||
- **Manual JWT input**: Tests textarea JWT input
|
||||
- **Manual contact data input**: Tests raw JSON input
|
||||
|
||||
#### Advanced Functionality Tests
|
||||
|
||||
- **Duplicate detection**: Tests existing contact identification
|
||||
- **Field comparison**: Tests difference display for modified contacts
|
||||
- **Selective import**: Tests checkbox selection functionality
|
||||
- **Visibility settings**: Tests activity visibility controls
|
||||
- **Mixed new/existing**: Tests combination scenarios
|
||||
- **Large import performance**: Tests performance with 10+ contacts
|
||||
|
||||
#### Error Handling Tests
|
||||
|
||||
- **Invalid JWT format**: Tests malformed JWT handling
|
||||
- **Empty contact array**: Tests empty data handling
|
||||
- **Missing required fields**: Tests incomplete data validation
|
||||
- **Wrong data types**: Tests type validation
|
||||
- **Network error simulation**: Tests network failure handling
|
||||
|
||||
### Test Data
|
||||
|
||||
#### Valid Test Contacts
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
const TEST_CONTACTS = {
|
||||
alice: {
|
||||
did: 'did:ethr:0x111d15564f824D56C7a07b913aA7aDd03382aA39',
|
||||
name: 'Alice Test',
|
||||
publicKey: 'alice-public-key-123'
|
||||
},
|
||||
bob: {
|
||||
did: 'did:ethr:0x222BB77E6Ff3774d34c751f3c1260866357B677b',
|
||||
name: 'Bob Test',
|
||||
publicKey: 'bob-public-key-456'
|
||||
},
|
||||
charlie: {
|
||||
did: 'did:ethr:0x333CC88F7Gg488e45d862f4d237097f748C788c',
|
||||
name: 'Charlie Test',
|
||||
publicKey: 'charlie-public-key-789'
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Invalid Test Data
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
const INVALID_DATA = {
|
||||
malformedJwt: 'eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.invalid.payload',
|
||||
emptyArray: '[]',
|
||||
missingFields: '[{"name":"Incomplete Contact"}]',
|
||||
wrongTypes: '[{"did":123,"name":456}]',
|
||||
networkError: 'http://invalid-url-that-will-fail.com/contacts'
|
||||
};
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Utility Functions Added
|
||||
|
||||
#### New Functions in `testUtils.ts`
|
||||
|
||||
- `createTestJwt(payload)`: Creates test JWT tokens
|
||||
- `cleanupTestContacts(page, contactNames)`: Cleans up test contacts
|
||||
- `addTestContact(page, did, name, publicKey?)`: Adds a test contact
|
||||
- `verifyContactExists(page, name)`: Verifies contact exists
|
||||
- `verifyContactCount(page, expectedCount)`: Verifies contact count
|
||||
|
||||
### Test Execution
|
||||
|
||||
#### Running Individual Tests
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Run all contact import tests
|
||||
npm run test:playwright -- 45-contact-import.spec.ts
|
||||
|
||||
# Run specific test
|
||||
npm run test:playwright -- 45-contact-import.spec.ts -g "Import single contact"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Test Environment Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
- Clean database state before each test
|
||||
- Test user (User 00) imported
|
||||
- No existing test contacts
|
||||
- Proper network connectivity for deep link tests
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Selectors Used
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
// Import functionality
|
||||
'button:has-text("Import Selected Contacts")'
|
||||
'textarea[placeholder="Contact-import data"]'
|
||||
'button:has-text("Check Import")'
|
||||
|
||||
// Contact list
|
||||
'li[data-testid="contactListItem"]'
|
||||
'h2:has-text("Contact Name")'
|
||||
|
||||
// Alert dialogs
|
||||
'div[role="alert"]'
|
||||
'span:has-text("Success")'
|
||||
'button > svg.fa-xmark'
|
||||
|
||||
// Import status
|
||||
'li:has-text("New")'
|
||||
'li:has-text("Existing")'
|
||||
'span:has-text("the same as")'
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Error Handling Validation
|
||||
|
||||
The tests verify proper error handling for:
|
||||
|
||||
- Invalid JWT tokens
|
||||
- Malformed contact data
|
||||
- Missing required fields
|
||||
- Network failures
|
||||
- Duplicate contact scenarios
|
||||
- Empty or invalid input
|
||||
|
||||
### Performance Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
- Tests include large contact list performance validation
|
||||
- Proper cleanup to prevent test interference
|
||||
- Efficient contact management utilities
|
||||
- Resource-intensive test classification
|
||||
|
||||
### Integration with Existing Tests
|
||||
|
||||
The contact import tests integrate with:
|
||||
|
||||
- Existing contact management tests (`40-add-contact.spec.ts`)
|
||||
- User management utilities (`testUtils.ts`)
|
||||
- Platform service testing infrastructure
|
||||
- Database migration testing framework
|
||||
|
||||
### Security Considerations
|
||||
|
||||
- JWT token validation testing
|
||||
- Input sanitization verification
|
||||
- Error message security (no sensitive data exposure)
|
||||
- Network request validation
|
||||
|
||||
## Migration Status
|
||||
|
||||
This test implementation addresses the TODO comment requirements:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
// TODO: Testing Required - Database Operations + Logging Migration to PlatformServiceMixin
|
||||
// Priority: Medium | Migrated: 2025-07-06 | Author: Matthew Raymer
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Status**: ✅ **COMPLETED** - August 4, 2025
|
||||
|
||||
All 6 testing requirements have been implemented with comprehensive coverage:
|
||||
|
||||
1. ✅ Contact import via URL
|
||||
2. ✅ JWT import via URL path
|
||||
3. ✅ Manual JWT input
|
||||
4. ✅ Duplicate contact detection
|
||||
5. ✅ Error scenarios
|
||||
6. ✅ Error logging verification
|
||||
|
||||
## Future Enhancements
|
||||
|
||||
Potential improvements for the test suite:
|
||||
|
||||
- Real JWT signing for more authentic testing
|
||||
- Network interception for better error simulation
|
||||
- Performance benchmarking metrics
|
||||
- Cross-platform compatibility testing
|
||||
- Accessibility testing for import interfaces
|
||||
|
||||
## Author
|
||||
|
||||
**Matthew Raymer** - 2025-08-04
|
||||
|
||||
This test suite provides comprehensive coverage of the contact import functionality
|
||||
and ensures robust validation of all import methods, error scenarios, and edge cases.
|
||||
@@ -1,256 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Performance Monitoring in Playwright Tests
|
||||
|
||||
Performance monitoring is more than just numbers — it’s about understanding **how your users experience your app** during automated test runs.
|
||||
This guide will teach you not just how to set it up, but also **why each step matters**.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Why Performance Monitoring Matters
|
||||
|
||||
Think of Playwright tests as quality control for your app’s speed and responsiveness.
|
||||
By adding performance monitoring, you can:
|
||||
|
||||
- 🚨 **Catch regressions early** before users feel them
|
||||
- 🎯 **Keep user experience consistent** across releases
|
||||
- 🔎 **Spot bottlenecks** in login, navigation, or heavy data flows
|
||||
- 📊 **Make informed decisions** with hard data, not guesses
|
||||
- 🏆 **Maintain performance standards** as features grow
|
||||
|
||||
> **Key Insight:** Without metrics, “fast” is just a feeling. With metrics, it’s a fact.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## How It Works: The Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
The monitoring system has **four pillars**:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **PerformanceCollector Class** – Collects raw metrics
|
||||
2. **Performance Utilities** – Easy-to-use helper functions
|
||||
3. **Test Integration** – Hooks directly into Playwright tests
|
||||
4. **Report Generation** – Creates JSON reports you can analyze later
|
||||
|
||||
Here’s a mental model:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Playwright Test
|
||||
|
|
||||
v
|
||||
PerformanceCollector (collects data)
|
||||
|
|
||||
v
|
||||
Report Generation → JSON / HTML / CI attachments
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Core Collector
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
// performanceUtils.ts
|
||||
export class PerformanceCollector {
|
||||
private page: Page;
|
||||
public metrics: any;
|
||||
public navigationMetrics: any[];
|
||||
private cdpSession: any;
|
||||
|
||||
// Methods for collecting various metrics
|
||||
async collectNavigationMetrics(label: string)
|
||||
async collectWebVitals()
|
||||
async measureUserAction(actionName: string, actionFn: () => Promise<void>)
|
||||
generateReport()
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
👉 **Teaching Point:** `measureUserAction` wraps a user action and times it, giving you reproducible benchmarks.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Quick Start: A Simple Example
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
import { createPerformanceCollector, attachPerformanceData } from './performanceUtils';
|
||||
|
||||
test('My test with performance monitoring', async ({ page }, testInfo) => {
|
||||
const perfCollector = await createPerformanceCollector(page);
|
||||
|
||||
// Measure user action
|
||||
await perfCollector.measureUserAction('click-button', async () => {
|
||||
await page.click('#my-button');
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// Attach data to the test report
|
||||
await attachPerformanceData(testInfo, perfCollector);
|
||||
});
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
✅ After this test runs, you’ll find performance data **directly in the Playwright report**.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Advanced Example: A Complete User Flow
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
test('Complex user flow with performance tracking', async ({ page }, testInfo) => {
|
||||
const perfCollector = await createPerformanceCollector(page);
|
||||
|
||||
await perfCollector.collectNavigationMetrics('initial-load');
|
||||
|
||||
await perfCollector.measureUserAction('login', async () => {
|
||||
await page.fill('#username', 'user');
|
||||
await page.fill('#password', 'pass');
|
||||
await page.click('#login-button');
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
await perfCollector.measureUserAction('navigate-to-dashboard', async () => {
|
||||
await page.goto('/dashboard');
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
await attachPerformanceData(testInfo, perfCollector);
|
||||
});
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
> **Pro Tip:** Use descriptive labels like `'login'` or `'navigate-to-dashboard'`
|
||||
to make reports easy to scan.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## What Metrics You’ll See
|
||||
|
||||
### Navigation Metrics (Page Load)
|
||||
|
||||
- `domContentLoaded` → When DOM is ready
|
||||
- `loadComplete` → When page is fully loaded
|
||||
- `firstPaint` → When users first *see* something
|
||||
- `serverResponse` → How quickly the backend responds
|
||||
|
||||
### User Action Metrics
|
||||
|
||||
- `duration` → How long the action took
|
||||
- `metrics` → Detailed performance snapshots
|
||||
|
||||
### Memory Usage
|
||||
|
||||
- `used`, `total`, `limit` → Helps catch leaks and spikes
|
||||
|
||||
### Web Vitals
|
||||
|
||||
- **LCP** → Largest Contentful Paint
|
||||
- **FID** → First Input Delay
|
||||
- **CLS** → Layout stability
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Reading the Data: A Beginner’s Lens
|
||||
|
||||
Here’s what a **healthy test run** might look like:
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "home-page-load",
|
||||
"metrics": {
|
||||
"domContentLoaded": 294,
|
||||
"loadComplete": 295,
|
||||
"serverResponse": 27.6,
|
||||
"resourceCount": 96
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Interpretation:**
|
||||
|
||||
- DOM loaded fast (<500ms) ✅
|
||||
- Server response is excellent (<100ms) ✅
|
||||
- Resource count is reasonable for a SPA ✅
|
||||
|
||||
Now, here’s a **problematic run**:
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"label": "slow-page-load",
|
||||
"metrics": {
|
||||
"domContentLoaded": 2500,
|
||||
"loadComplete": 5000,
|
||||
"serverResponse": 800,
|
||||
"resourceCount": 200
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Interpretation:**
|
||||
|
||||
- DOM took 2.5s ❌
|
||||
- Full load took 5s ❌
|
||||
- Too many resources (200) ❌
|
||||
|
||||
> **Lesson:** Slow page loads often mean large bundles, too many requests, or server lag.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Performance Threshold Cheat Sheet
|
||||
|
||||
| Metric | Excellent | Good | Poor |
|
||||
|--------|-----------|------|------|
|
||||
| domContentLoaded | < 500ms | < 1000ms | > 2000ms |
|
||||
| loadComplete | < 1000ms | < 2000ms | > 3000ms |
|
||||
| userAction duration | < 100ms | < 300ms | > 500ms |
|
||||
| memory usage | < 50MB | < 100MB | > 150MB |
|
||||
|
||||
👉 Use these thresholds to set alerts in your regression tests.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Common Patterns
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Initial Page Load**
|
||||
- ✅ DOM in <500ms
|
||||
- ✅ Load in <1000ms
|
||||
- ⚠️ Watch out for large bundles
|
||||
|
||||
2. **User Interaction**
|
||||
- ✅ Actions under 100ms
|
||||
- ✅ Few/no extra requests
|
||||
- ⚠️ Avoid bloated API calls
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Navigation**
|
||||
- ✅ <200ms between pages
|
||||
- ⚠️ Inconsistency usually means missing cache headers
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Best Practices
|
||||
|
||||
- 📏 **Consistency** – Measure the same flows every run
|
||||
- 🧪 **Realism** – Test with production-like data
|
||||
- 🏗 **Environment Control** – Use stable test environments
|
||||
- 📉 **Set Thresholds** – Define what “slow” means for your team
|
||||
- 🔁 **Continuous Monitoring** – Run in CI/CD and watch trends
|
||||
|
||||
> **Remember:** A fast app last release doesn’t guarantee it’s fast today.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Migration Tip
|
||||
|
||||
**Before (Manual Timing):**
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
const start = Date.now();
|
||||
await page.click('#button');
|
||||
console.log(Date.now() - start);
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**After (Structured Monitoring):**
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
await perfCollector.measureUserAction('button-click', async () => {
|
||||
await page.click('#button');
|
||||
});
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Cleaner, more consistent, and automatically reported.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Takeaway
|
||||
|
||||
Performance monitoring in Playwright isn’t just about collecting data — it’s
|
||||
about making your tests **teach you** how users experience your app.
|
||||
The **PerformanceCollector** class plus good testing habits give you a clear,
|
||||
data-driven picture of app health.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user