# Evidence Packet

## Claims used
- ENOCH-DSS-001
- ENOCH-DSS-002
- ENOCH-DSS-003
- ENOCH-FRAME-002

## Primary evidence
- DSS preserve 1 Enoch in Aramaic fragments
- DSS preserve Tobit
- DSS preserve Jubilees
- proximity and clustering within a broader preserved textual environment

## Secondary evidence
- scholarship on DSS as library rather than later-style canon
- scholarship on Aramaic Jewish texts at Qumran
- scholarship exploring Tobit / Enoch / Jubilees relationships

## Vulnerabilities
- proximity does not prove equal authority
- proximity does not prove direct literary dependence
- sectarian identity of Qumran should not be overclaimed

## Response strategy
- argue textual environment first
- avoid claiming too much too early
- emphasize clustering, overlap, and preserved network
