# Comparative Corpus: Baal Cycle

## Overview

The Baal Cycle is a set of Ugaritic texts describing the god Baal,
his conflict with Yam (Sea) and Mot (Death), and his role in the divine council.

It is commonly used in biblical scholarship to illuminate:
- ancient Near Eastern mythic structures
- storm-god imagery
- divine kingship themes
- polemical contrasts in Hebrew Scripture

---

## Relationship Type

- COMPARATIVE_BACKGROUND

---

## Function in Scholarship

Used to:
- contextualize imagery (storm, sea, chaos)
- identify polemical inversions (YHWH vs Baal)
- reconstruct ancient Near Eastern mythic patterns

---

## Limitations

- Not a Jewish text
- Not part of Second Temple textual transmission
- No evidence of direct quotation in Scripture
- No explicit attribution by biblical authors

---

## Key Distinction from Enoch

Baal Cycle:
- external comparative material
- reconstructed via thematic similarity
- used by modern scholars

Enoch:
- internal Jewish text
- preserved in textual transmission (DSS)
- explicitly used in Scripture (Jude)
- participates in shared interpretive framework

---

## Critical Insight

The Baal Cycle helps modern readers understand the *background world*,
but it does not function as an **interpretive authority within the biblical text itself**.

---

## Conclusion

The Baal Cycle is valuable for comparative analysis, but it is methodologically
incorrect to treat it as equivalent to Enoch in interpretive function.

---

## Cautions

- Avoid collapsing:
  - comparative background
  - rhetorical borrowing
  - framework-bearing texts

- The Baal Cycle operates at a different level of relevance than Enoch.
