# Evidence Packet

## Claims used
- ENOCH-NT-001
- ENOCH-AUTH-001
- ENOCH-AUTH-003

## Primary evidence
- Jude 14–15 (direct quotation of Enoch)
- Prophetic attribution formula
- Judicial context of passage

## Comparative evidence
- Acts 17 (Greek poets as rhetorical)
- Baal Cycle (comparative only)

## Key distinctions
- attribution vs anonymous quotation
- prophetic vs rhetorical use
- framework-bearing vs illustrative

## Vulnerabilities

### Objection
Quotation does not imply authority

### Response
- context and function matter
- prophetic framing is significant

---

### Objection
Only partial acceptance

### Response
- still raises authority and coherence questions
- cannot reduce to irrelevance

---

### Objection
Jude reflects a fringe tradition

### Response
- does not remove interpretive significance
- still part of Scripture