18 lines
5.0 KiB
Plaintext
Executable File
18 lines
5.0 KiB
Plaintext
Executable File
rutgers&heberto.lara&TB_Fisch&6.0.0&&&TB_Fisch&&&terry@tgwall.com, bcarico@actscorp.com&N.Y.N.N.Y.N.N.N.N.N
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
0.unlimited....1.&TB_Peer.001&TB_Peer.002&TB_Peer.003&TB_Peer.004&TB_Peer.005&TB_Peer.006&TB_Peer.007&TB_Peer.008&TB_Peer.009&TB_Peer.010&TB_Peer.011&TB_Peer.012&TB_Peer.013&TB_Peer.014&TB_Peer.015&TB_Peer.016&TB_Peer.017
|
||
&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P1.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P1.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P1.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P2.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P2.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P2.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P3.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P3.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P3.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P4.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P4.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P4.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P5.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P5.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P5.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P6.0:1:5:0&::P6.0:1:1:0
|
||
&?xxx?1?xxx?xxx?xxx::He shared his oppinions openly but seemed to ignore <BR>other people´s, maybe because the great knowledge he <BR>had about the project even before we started&?xxx?1?xxx?xxx?xxx::He rarely shared with the team what he would do, <BR>but normally announced what he did. He tended to <BR>act independently and without openly sharing with <BR>the team in advance. He did provided great and <BR>highly valuable information, but usually by <BR>infoming the team afterwards&?xxx?1?xxx?xxx?xxx::He is very intelligent and with outstanding speed <BR>of mind, and most of the time this makes him seem <BR>distracted and not paying attention when other <BR>share ideas with him.&?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?4::The message was very clear, but the wrong one. He <BR>made the team feel that the message was: I already <BR>know what needs to be done, I do not need anything <BR>else and I do not see the need for all this <BR>"teamwork" and sharing ideas.&?xxx?1?xxx?xxx?xxx::He acted on his own and then informed the team of <BR>the result, if positive. At least twice during the <BR>process, he made some specific comments with other <BR>people that jeopardized the outcome of the <BR>project, wihtout considering the perspective of <BR>other team members.&?xxx?1?xxx?xxx?xxx::Actually his attitude communicated the opposite, <BR>but maybe because he was already two miles ahead <BR>of the rest of us. Perception was that we missed a <BR>great opportunity of learning from him because he <BR>never looked back to see where we were on <BR>following him.&?xxx?1?xxx?xxx?xxx::He seems to not even be aware of the problems. <BR>Even when confronted directly, he seemed to be <BR>surprised by the fact that something was perceived <BR>as not working properly&?xxx?1?xxx?xxx?xxx::Maybe by not being fully concious of the way <BR>situation was perceived by other team members, there <BR>was nothing to feel responsability for.&?xxx?1?xxx?xxx?xxx::Tends to act issolated and ignored specific team <BR>efforts to share information and facilitate <BR>communication in an organized way, like using a <BR>centralized google site to keep project "official" <BR>information and openly communicate whith the team <BR>for important decisions, like sharing information <BR>with others.&?xxx?1?xxx?xxx?xxx::No. He was strongly focused on the final result <BR>and "winning", but forgot that we were a team and <BR>another key objective was to learn and improve in <BR>areas out of our own expertise&?xxx?1?xxx?xxx?xxx::Normally he shared his point of view and let us know <BR>what needed to be done next.&?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?4::Looking in retrospective, his attitude made the <BR>rest of us to step up and do whatever needed to be <BR>done to get the results. May sound as a <BR>contradicition, but at the end this forced <BR>everyone of us to do our best and overcome <BR>whatever challenge we faced.&?xxx?xxx?2?xxx?xxx::Not as an immediate reaction, but eventually he <BR>accepted new ideas and incorporated them into what <BR>was finally agreed by the team as the best solution&?xxx?xxx?2?xxx?xxx::No.He tended to act independently and that made it <BR>very difficult for the team to follow him.&?xxx?1?xxx?xxx?xxx::He seemed to not even care for other people´s <BR>emotions and focused only on the result and be the <BR>winner.&?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?4::Finally he brouth to the team most of the <BR>information we needed to reach and present our <BR>conclusions. He was a key element on the team <BR>success in what relates to information. The <BR>process of interacting and sharing as team members <BR>was very difficult, but as stated before, at the <BR>end it worked for good and made us stretch and <BR>overcome the obstacles.&People skills.
|
||
<BR>Learning to share his knowledge with others may help
|
||
<BR>him leverage and reach higher responsibilites.
|
||
<BR>Ability to communicate his ideas in a way that make
|
||
<BR>them accessible to others.::Tony is an outstanding individual, with an <BR>extraordinary intelligence and great ability to <BR>process and analyze huge amounts of information. <BR>Reinforcing his personal, leadership and teamwork <BR>skills would made him an outstanding candidate for <BR>greater challenges and responsibilities with the <BR>company.
|
||
Not Scored by Definition
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|