rutgers&heberto.lara&TB_Fisch&6.0.0&&&TB_Fisch&&&terry@tgwall.com, bcarico@actscorp.com&N.Y.N.N.Y.N.N.N.N.N
0.unlimited....1.&TB_Peer.001&TB_Peer.002&TB_Peer.003&TB_Peer.004&TB_Peer.005&TB_Peer.006&TB_Peer.007&TB_Peer.008&TB_Peer.009&TB_Peer.010&TB_Peer.011&TB_Peer.012&TB_Peer.013&TB_Peer.014&TB_Peer.015&TB_Peer.016&TB_Peer.017
&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P1.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P1.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P1.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P2.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P2.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P2.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P3.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P3.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P3.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P4.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P4.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P4.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P5.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P5.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P5.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P6.0:1:5:0&::P6.0:1:1:0
&?xxx?1?xxx?xxx?xxx::He shared his oppinions openly but seemed to ignore 
other people´s, maybe because the great knowledge he 
had about the project even before we started&?xxx?1?xxx?xxx?xxx::He rarely shared with the team what he would do, 
but normally announced what he did. He tended to 
act independently and without openly sharing with 
the team in advance. He did provided great and 
highly valuable information, but usually by 
infoming the team afterwards&?xxx?1?xxx?xxx?xxx::He is very intelligent and with outstanding speed 
of mind, and most of the time this makes him seem 
distracted and not paying attention when other 
share ideas with him.&?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?4::The message was very clear, but the wrong one. He 
made the team feel that the message was: I already 
know what needs to be done, I do not need anything 
else and I do not see the need for all this 
"teamwork" and sharing ideas.&?xxx?1?xxx?xxx?xxx::He acted on his own and then informed the team of 
the result, if positive. At least twice during the  
process, he made some specific comments with other 
people that jeopardized the outcome of the 
project, wihtout considering the perspective of 
other team members.&?xxx?1?xxx?xxx?xxx::Actually his attitude communicated the opposite, 
but maybe because he was already two miles ahead 
of the rest of us. Perception was that we missed a 
great opportunity of learning from him because he 
never looked back to see where we were on 
following him.&?xxx?1?xxx?xxx?xxx::He seems to not even be aware of the problems. 
Even when confronted directly, he seemed to be 
surprised by the fact that something was perceived 
as not working properly&?xxx?1?xxx?xxx?xxx::Maybe by not being fully concious of the way 
situation was perceived by other team members, there 
was nothing to feel responsability for.&?xxx?1?xxx?xxx?xxx::Tends to act issolated and ignored specific team 
efforts to share information and facilitate 
communication in an organized way, like using a 
centralized google site to keep project "official" 
information and openly communicate whith the team 
for important decisions, like sharing information 
with others.&?xxx?1?xxx?xxx?xxx::No. He was strongly focused on the final result 
and "winning", but forgot that we were a team and 
another key objective was to learn and improve in 
areas out of our own expertise&?xxx?1?xxx?xxx?xxx::Normally he shared his point of view and let us know 
what needed to be done next.&?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?4::Looking in retrospective, his attitude made the 
rest of us to step up and do whatever needed to be 
done to get the results. May sound as a 
contradicition, but at the end this forced 
everyone of us to do our best and overcome 
whatever challenge we faced.&?xxx?xxx?2?xxx?xxx::Not as an immediate reaction, but eventually he 
accepted new ideas and incorporated them into what 
was finally agreed by the team as the best solution&?xxx?xxx?2?xxx?xxx::No.He tended to act independently and that made it 
very difficult for the team to follow him.&?xxx?1?xxx?xxx?xxx::He seemed to not even care for other people´s 
emotions and focused only on the result and be the 
winner.&?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?4::Finally he brouth to the team most of the 
information we needed to reach and present our 
conclusions. He was a key element on the team 
success in what relates to information. The 
process of interacting and sharing as team members  
was very difficult, but as stated before, at the 
end it worked for good and made us stretch and 
overcome the obstacles.&People skills.
Learning to share his knowledge with others may help 
him leverage and reach higher responsibilites.
Ability to communicate his ideas in a way that make 
them accessible to others.::Tony is an outstanding individual, with an 
extraordinary intelligence and great ability to 
process and analyze huge amounts of information. 
Reinforcing his personal, leadership and teamwork 
skills would made him an outstanding candidate for 
greater challenges and responsibilities with the 
company.
Not Scored by Definition