pwgsc&gwelligan&custsat1&6.0.0&&&custsat1&&&bcarico@actscorp.com&N.Y.N.N




0.1.o.o.o.N.0&custsat1.001&custsat1.003&custsat1.004&custsat1.006&custsat1.007&custsat1.008&custsat1.009&custsat1.011&custsat1.013&custsat1.015&custsat1.016&custsat1.018&custsat1.019
&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::.0:1:1:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0?5=0?6=0?7=0?8=0?9=0?10=0?11=0::.0:1:1:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0?5=0?6=0?7=0?8=0?9=0?10=0?11=0::.0:1:1:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::.0:1:1:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::.0:1:1:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::.0:1:1:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::.0:1:1:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::.0:1:1:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::.0:1:1:0&::.0:1:1:N.&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::.0:1:1:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0::.0:1:1:N.&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0?5=0?6=0::.0:1:1:N.
&?xxx?1?xxx?xxx?xxx::&?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx::&?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx::&?xxx?xxx?xxx?3?xxx::&?xxx?xxx?2?xxx?xxx::&?xxx?1?xxx?xxx?xxx::&?xxx?xxx?2?xxx?xxx::&?xxx?xxx?2?xxx?xxx::Although it is a positive step in the right direction, I have seen little impact so far from a Regional perspective.  Branches still appear very %27stove piped%27. &?xxx?xxx?2?xxx?xxx::&::&?xxx?xxx?xxx?3?xxx::Questions too broad in scope.%0D%0A&??xxx?xxx::&?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?6::
Not Scored by Definition