rutgers&vonya.day&TB_Moman&6.0.0&&&TB_Moman&&&terry@tgwall.com, bcarico@actscorp.com&N.Y.N.N.Y.N.N.N.N.N




0.unlimited....1.&TB_Peer.001&TB_Peer.002&TB_Peer.003&TB_Peer.004&TB_Peer.005&TB_Peer.006&TB_Peer.007&TB_Peer.008&TB_Peer.009&TB_Peer.010&TB_Peer.011&TB_Peer.012&TB_Peer.013&TB_Peer.014&TB_Peer.015&TB_Peer.016&TB_Peer.017
&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P1.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P1.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P1.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P2.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P2.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P2.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P3.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P3.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P3.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P4.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P4.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P4.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P5.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P5.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P5.0:1:5:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::P6.0:1:5:0&::P6.0:1:1:0
&?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?4::&?xxx?xxx?2?xxx?xxx::There were times when Alan did not respond to team <BR>emails / texts and we werent sure if he was going <BR>to complete his tasks.&?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?4::&?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?4::&?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?4::&?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?4::Alan was a great listener.  You could tell when you <BR>talked with him that he was interested in what you <BR>were saying and what you wanted to do.&?xxx?xxx?2?xxx?xxx::&?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?4::Alan had some difficulties in doing his part of <BR>the team work during the reality project.  He <BR>never made excuses and always accepted full <BR>responsibility for missing meetings or maybe not <BR>coming through with his part in a timely manner.&?xxx?xxx?2?xxx?xxx::Alan promoted teamwork when he was available - he <BR>was just not available for a fair amount of the <BR>time during the last few weeks of the reality <BR>project - the crunch time.&?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?4::very personable&?xxx?xxx?2?xxx?xxx::&?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?4::&?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?4::Very adaptable and willing to listen and make <BR>changes as discussed by the team.&?xxx?xxx?xxx?3?xxx::&?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?4::&?xxx?xxx?2?xxx?xxx::I did feel that Alan could have helped our project <BR>if he had been engaged more.  I know he had a busy <BR>workload, but we needed his point of view and <BR>expertise.  I felt we really were missing what he <BR>could have brought to the project to make it <BR>better.&Assertiveness - I think he has great ideas and the 
<BR>team would benefit if he were more assertive and 
<BR>brought those out.
<BR>Dependability - I wished he would have been more 
<BR>engaged in the project.  During the crunch time of 
<BR>the project, I had no idea if he was going to make 
<BR>meetings and what he had done on his part of the 
<BR>project.
<BR>Confidence - Alan can present well, but I dont 
<BR>think he believes it.  I think if he were more 
<BR>confident then others would see how well he knows 
<BR>his information.::Alan was a good team member.  He always was <BR>willing to listen and adapt.  I think he is a good <BR>collaborator, but I think maybe he just had too <BR>many things going on during the last project to <BR>deliver like I think he is capable.  Overall I was <BR>a little disappointed because I know he has the <BR>potential to have helped our team a lot more with <BR>his background and areas of expertise and I think <BR>our project somewhat missed what he had to bring <BR>to it.  However, when you consider the whole <BR>entire program time frame, Alan was involved in <BR>helping our team succeed. 
Not Scored by Definition