pwgsc&rcyr&custsat1&6.0.0&&&custsat1&&&bcarico@actscorp.com&N.Y.N.N




0.1.o.o.o.N.0&custsat1.001&custsat1.003&custsat1.004&custsat1.006&custsat1.007&custsat1.008&custsat1.009&custsat1.011&custsat1.013&custsat1.015&custsat1.016&custsat1.018&custsat1.019
&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::.0:1:1:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0?5=0?6=0?7=0?8=0?9=0?10=0?11=0::.0:1:1:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0?5=0?6=0?7=0?8=0?9=0?10=0?11=0::.0:1:1:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::.0:1:1:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::.0:1:1:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::.0:1:1:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::.0:1:1:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::.0:1:1:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::.0:1:1:0&::.0:1:1:N.&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0::.0:1:1:0&?0=0?1=0?2=0::.0:1:1:N.&?0=0?1=0?2=0?3=0?4=0?5=0?6=0::.0:1:1:N.
&?xxx?xxx?xxx?3?xxx::NCS seems to have adopted a one-size-fits all support and cost model. The model is not transparent, and too complex, and monthly reporting on resources/service provided often does not seem to reflect what the client has observed.&?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?8?9?xxx?xxx::&?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?10?xxx::Additional IM/IT services for security, monitoring, auditing, intrusion detection, should always be shared amongst the overall NCS client based at a reduced cost.&?xxx?xxx?xxx?3?xxx::Additional IM/IT services for security, monitoring, auditing, intrusion detection, should always be shared amongst the overall NCS client based at a reduced cost.&?xxx?xxx?2?xxx?xxx::&?xxx?xxx?xxx?3?xxx::Too long turn around time for set-up, RATE testing, etc compared to private sector.&?xxx?xxx?2?xxx?xxx::&?xxx?xxx?xxx?3?xxx::The COSRs we are dealing with are often innaccessible, do not respond quickly, and often don%27t have the information at hand.&?xxx?xxx?xxx?3?xxx::&::&?xxx?xxx?xxx?3?xxx::&?xxx?1?xxx::&?xxx?1?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx?xxx::
Not Scored by Definition