You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
3251 lines
110 KiB
3251 lines
110 KiB
WEBVTT
|
|
|
|
03:00.000 --> 03:05.000
|
|
Japanese television. People everywhere are starting to listen to him.
|
|
|
|
03:06.000 --> 03:08.000
|
|
It's embarrassing.
|
|
|
|
03:13.000 --> 03:15.000
|
|
Where does this one come in?
|
|
|
|
03:15.000 --> 03:18.000
|
|
What better way for a swimmer to disappear?
|
|
|
|
03:18.000 --> 03:21.000
|
|
Uncle Stewart, why did you do it?
|
|
|
|
03:21.000 --> 03:25.000
|
|
Well, I guess he can explain it to the sheriff when he gets here.
|
|
|
|
03:25.000 --> 03:27.000
|
|
I bet you kids are starving.
|
|
|
|
03:27.000 --> 03:29.000
|
|
Zoinks, that's for me.
|
|
|
|
03:32.000 --> 03:34.000
|
|
Hey, what's this?
|
|
|
|
03:34.000 --> 03:37.000
|
|
Scooby Dooze was here.
|
|
|
|
03:37.000 --> 03:39.000
|
|
The whole turkey?
|
|
|
|
03:39.000 --> 03:40.000
|
|
Gone?
|
|
|
|
03:43.000 --> 03:45.000
|
|
Scooby, here we go!
|
|
|
|
03:57.000 --> 04:15.000
|
|
Are we doing the stand-through in the city of the age?
|
|
|
|
04:15.000 --> 04:17.000
|
|
Yes, two days ago.
|
|
|
|
04:17.000 --> 04:19.000
|
|
One side to the receiver.
|
|
|
|
04:28.000 --> 04:33.000
|
|
Good evening, ladies and gentlemen.
|
|
|
|
04:33.000 --> 04:38.000
|
|
This is Kigo, biological, high resistance, low noise, information brief brought to you.
|
|
|
|
04:38.000 --> 04:40.000
|
|
High biologists don't understand.
|
|
|
|
04:40.000 --> 04:45.000
|
|
It's the 1st of October, 2020.
|
|
|
|
04:45.000 --> 04:54.000
|
|
They are still slowly fighting our way out of this wet paper bag of a spectrum of debate.
|
|
|
|
04:55.000 --> 05:00.000
|
|
It's taken a while, though, because a lot of people have been deceived.
|
|
|
|
05:00.000 --> 05:09.000
|
|
A lot of people have been deceived by an illusion of consensus created by people on the internet and on TV.
|
|
|
|
05:09.000 --> 05:13.000
|
|
All with the idea of misleading the young.
|
|
|
|
05:13.000 --> 05:16.000
|
|
And that's the spell we've got to break.
|
|
|
|
05:16.000 --> 05:20.000
|
|
That's where we've got to take this, and that's how we've got to think about it.
|
|
|
|
05:21.000 --> 05:29.000
|
|
We've got to go back to things we've known for decades, if not generations.
|
|
|
|
05:29.000 --> 05:33.000
|
|
Make sure that this history is not lost.
|
|
|
|
05:37.000 --> 05:42.000
|
|
And the way to get it back is to take it from these charlatans, that's correct.
|
|
|
|
05:42.000 --> 05:46.000
|
|
We must take back power from these charlatans.
|
|
|
|
05:47.000 --> 05:52.000
|
|
Because the brick wall is visible at the back of the theater.
|
|
|
|
05:52.000 --> 05:56.000
|
|
It's only a question of what are you going to do about it now?
|
|
|
|
05:56.000 --> 05:59.000
|
|
What are you going to do about it now?
|
|
|
|
06:05.000 --> 06:10.000
|
|
What if I was to tell you there was no spread in New York City that infectious clones were the only real threat
|
|
|
|
06:10.000 --> 06:15.000
|
|
that placebo badges were likely distributed in their transfections in healthy mammals?
|
|
|
|
06:15.000 --> 06:18.000
|
|
It's dumb.
|
|
|
|
06:18.000 --> 06:21.000
|
|
What if I was to tell you the protocols were murder?
|
|
|
|
06:21.000 --> 06:27.000
|
|
The gain of function is a mythology in that this Scooby-Doo mystery is actually a real thing.
|
|
|
|
06:27.000 --> 06:32.000
|
|
And that the players are just spectacularly committed to lies.
|
|
|
|
06:32.000 --> 06:35.000
|
|
Wouldn't that make a lot more sense?
|
|
|
|
06:35.000 --> 06:46.000
|
|
A lot simpler than some complex idea about adding nucleic acids to a chain of other nucleic acids
|
|
|
|
06:46.000 --> 06:53.000
|
|
and then suddenly it's endowed with the ability to disrupt an entire planet?
|
|
|
|
06:53.000 --> 06:56.000
|
|
Because that's really the story we've been told, right?
|
|
|
|
06:56.000 --> 07:07.000
|
|
Is that a DNA molecule created in a laboratory is able to disrupt the economy and cultures
|
|
|
|
07:07.000 --> 07:14.000
|
|
and health systems of a planet?
|
|
|
|
07:14.000 --> 07:16.000
|
|
Are you listening to this?
|
|
|
|
07:16.000 --> 07:18.000
|
|
Are you hearing this?
|
|
|
|
07:19.000 --> 07:26.000
|
|
We are being told that a combination, yeah, get out of here, Captain.
|
|
|
|
07:26.000 --> 07:32.000
|
|
A combination of amino acids, sorry, my bad.
|
|
|
|
07:32.000 --> 07:42.000
|
|
A combination of nucleic acids in a ribonucleic acid chain is capable of creating a bioweapon
|
|
|
|
07:42.000 --> 07:53.000
|
|
that if released could disrupt the social and economic framework of an entire species
|
|
|
|
07:53.000 --> 07:59.000
|
|
which up until that point was doing just fine.
|
|
|
|
07:59.000 --> 08:03.000
|
|
I mean, that's really a Star Trek-level story that they've told us.
|
|
|
|
08:03.000 --> 08:11.000
|
|
It's a weapon that's as Kim.com said when he was alive with Andrew Huff or whoever it was
|
|
|
|
08:11.000 --> 08:15.000
|
|
that he was talking to, that it's much better than a nuclear weapon.
|
|
|
|
08:15.000 --> 08:20.000
|
|
I mean, you can kill billions of people. This is a planet-wide power.
|
|
|
|
08:20.000 --> 08:23.000
|
|
It's the biological equivalent to a Death Star.
|
|
|
|
08:23.000 --> 08:27.000
|
|
Only you don't destroy the real estate.
|
|
|
|
08:27.000 --> 08:33.000
|
|
I mean, we are talking dream-team-level biology here.
|
|
|
|
08:33.000 --> 08:38.000
|
|
And so it's a spectacular narrative that needs disruption.
|
|
|
|
08:38.000 --> 08:46.000
|
|
Sorry for that audio cut being so drastically quick there, right back to the crickets.
|
|
|
|
08:46.000 --> 08:51.000
|
|
Don't take the bait on TV and social media. It is getting quite hectic out there.
|
|
|
|
08:51.000 --> 08:56.000
|
|
That's because the Scooby-Doo is starting to fall apart on the inside
|
|
|
|
08:56.000 --> 09:01.000
|
|
and they're starting to understand that people are starting to really get it,
|
|
|
|
09:01.000 --> 09:03.000
|
|
that they've been lied to.
|
|
|
|
09:03.000 --> 09:08.000
|
|
And that's really enough for most people, right? Because they've had this gut feeling for a long time.
|
|
|
|
09:08.000 --> 09:12.000
|
|
They've had all these anecdotal things that just don't add up in their head.
|
|
|
|
09:12.000 --> 09:17.000
|
|
And so if you give them this pretty easy to understand explanation
|
|
|
|
09:17.000 --> 09:22.000
|
|
with a combination of power and money and comfort and any other number of things
|
|
|
|
09:22.000 --> 09:29.000
|
|
like prestige among your peers, lots of people do stupid stuff.
|
|
|
|
09:29.000 --> 09:35.000
|
|
And in this case, you know, they've worked on this for a couple of decades.
|
|
|
|
09:35.000 --> 09:42.000
|
|
And some of the people that are involved in it probably really don't understand how bad it is.
|
|
|
|
09:42.000 --> 09:49.000
|
|
But it's bad because we've been lied to for a very long time about the pandemic potential of coronaviruses
|
|
|
|
09:49.000 --> 09:54.000
|
|
and with good reason because once this mythology is settled in,
|
|
|
|
09:54.000 --> 10:02.000
|
|
then this combination of patents and products can be used to control us for the next decade or decade and a half.
|
|
|
|
10:02.000 --> 10:10.000
|
|
Unlike any time in history, patents have come to market without, like in the bio-text sphere,
|
|
|
|
10:10.000 --> 10:17.000
|
|
without elaborate time frame needed for research and development and testing and approval.
|
|
|
|
10:17.000 --> 10:23.000
|
|
Instead, they've been brought to market en masse under the pretext of an emergency
|
|
|
|
10:23.000 --> 10:27.000
|
|
and because they've been so widely distributed and accepted as working,
|
|
|
|
10:27.000 --> 10:30.000
|
|
most of these patents are probably going to go on forward.
|
|
|
|
10:30.000 --> 10:36.000
|
|
These products are going to be gone forward, maybe in new versions.
|
|
|
|
10:36.000 --> 10:38.000
|
|
But nevertheless, you're going to have testing.
|
|
|
|
10:38.000 --> 10:41.000
|
|
You're going to have these products that are going to be going forward
|
|
|
|
10:41.000 --> 10:45.000
|
|
that are going to be testing for other things using the same methodologies.
|
|
|
|
10:45.000 --> 10:51.000
|
|
We're going to have mRNA shots with lipid nanoparticles for other targets,
|
|
|
|
10:51.000 --> 11:04.000
|
|
and so this whole collection of new ideas and their sort of legal control exerted on the market
|
|
|
|
11:04.000 --> 11:09.000
|
|
by setting a sort of industry standard for what's coming in the future,
|
|
|
|
11:09.000 --> 11:16.000
|
|
and then using the pandemic to leverage these technologies into place
|
|
|
|
11:16.000 --> 11:24.000
|
|
without this normal extended regulatory hoops to jump through all this other stuff.
|
|
|
|
11:24.000 --> 11:28.000
|
|
Now, a couple of that in with the fact that during the deployment of this,
|
|
|
|
11:28.000 --> 11:32.000
|
|
there were probably lots of different people producing different formulations,
|
|
|
|
11:32.000 --> 11:39.000
|
|
and so with careful record-keeping, the best formulations, the best methodologies
|
|
|
|
11:39.000 --> 11:44.000
|
|
could be kept track of, could be noted, and moving forward,
|
|
|
|
11:44.000 --> 11:51.000
|
|
perhaps the widespread devastation could be reduced,
|
|
|
|
11:51.000 --> 11:55.000
|
|
and this all goes along well with people who are just selling the product,
|
|
|
|
11:55.000 --> 11:59.000
|
|
just selling, just pushing, and with the full belief that this stuff works,
|
|
|
|
11:59.000 --> 12:01.000
|
|
kind of like Theranos.
|
|
|
|
12:01.000 --> 12:06.000
|
|
When in reality, the people that actually understand the biology
|
|
|
|
12:06.000 --> 12:10.000
|
|
are first and foremost concerned with the idea of the transfection
|
|
|
|
12:10.000 --> 12:16.000
|
|
such a long-lived animal as a human, it's just not really a viable technology
|
|
|
|
12:16.000 --> 12:22.000
|
|
because of the cascade of possibilities that exist in a long-lived animal
|
|
|
|
12:22.000 --> 12:29.000
|
|
and the cascade of possibilities that exist in an animal,
|
|
|
|
12:29.000 --> 12:33.000
|
|
yeah, well, in an animal as complex as a human,
|
|
|
|
12:33.000 --> 12:36.000
|
|
and I'm not really sure how to codify exactly how complex we are,
|
|
|
|
12:36.000 --> 12:41.000
|
|
but suffice it to say that it's easier to make a genetic knockout mouse
|
|
|
|
12:41.000 --> 12:46.000
|
|
than it is to make a genetic knockout rat genetically modified monkeys
|
|
|
|
12:46.000 --> 12:52.000
|
|
are even harder to make, and it is the complexity of the animal,
|
|
|
|
12:52.000 --> 12:55.000
|
|
and the brain, and the immune system, and everything.
|
|
|
|
12:55.000 --> 13:02.000
|
|
As you go up the evolutionary ladder, and as you get longer lifespans,
|
|
|
|
13:02.000 --> 13:10.000
|
|
it seems in many of these mammals that in order for that pattern integrity
|
|
|
|
13:10.000 --> 13:15.000
|
|
to sustain itself for that long, you either need to have a very slow metabolism
|
|
|
|
13:15.000 --> 13:21.000
|
|
like a reptile, or if you're going to be high metabolism like a mammal,
|
|
|
|
13:21.000 --> 13:25.000
|
|
then you're going to have to have enzymes and homeostatic mechanisms
|
|
|
|
13:25.000 --> 13:30.000
|
|
that are far beyond that required in a mouse where generationally,
|
|
|
|
13:30.000 --> 13:34.000
|
|
it doesn't matter if they get cancer.
|
|
|
|
13:34.000 --> 13:40.000
|
|
And so this is really the crux also of understanding the danger
|
|
|
|
13:40.000 --> 13:43.000
|
|
of a lot of these applications, which appear to work in mice,
|
|
|
|
13:43.000 --> 13:46.000
|
|
appear to work in an animal model.
|
|
|
|
13:46.000 --> 13:50.000
|
|
In an animal model where the animal is not evaluated for its long-term health,
|
|
|
|
13:50.000 --> 13:58.000
|
|
is an evaluated for subtle pains and aches and all these things
|
|
|
|
13:58.000 --> 14:03.000
|
|
that a child or a teenager or an adult would, of course,
|
|
|
|
14:03.000 --> 14:07.000
|
|
be aware of, complain about, and experience.
|
|
|
|
14:07.000 --> 14:11.000
|
|
How do you go about evaluating the side effects of transfection
|
|
|
|
14:11.000 --> 14:18.000
|
|
in an animal model for whom the only outward signs are tumors or death?
|
|
|
|
14:18.000 --> 14:24.000
|
|
So this is really the sort of extraordinary jump that we've made at this point,
|
|
|
|
14:24.000 --> 14:27.000
|
|
all under the pretense that this is a gain of function virus,
|
|
|
|
14:27.000 --> 14:31.000
|
|
most likely leaked from a laboratory, maybe even on purpose.
|
|
|
|
14:31.000 --> 14:34.000
|
|
And so at least they tried something, at least we got lucky,
|
|
|
|
14:34.000 --> 14:37.000
|
|
and some of the shots worked, or some of the people were protected,
|
|
|
|
14:37.000 --> 14:42.000
|
|
or some of the people got antibodies.
|
|
|
|
14:42.000 --> 14:44.000
|
|
And it's these people who have misled us.
|
|
|
|
14:44.000 --> 14:48.000
|
|
And as they've misled us, they've misled us about very specific things,
|
|
|
|
14:48.000 --> 14:53.000
|
|
which have led us down this path of figuring it out.
|
|
|
|
14:53.000 --> 14:56.000
|
|
And that's the part that gets me the most frustrated,
|
|
|
|
14:56.000 --> 14:59.000
|
|
is that we've been misled to think that we are figuring it out,
|
|
|
|
14:59.000 --> 15:04.000
|
|
and I'm one of those people who dedicated a year and a half of my life
|
|
|
|
15:04.000 --> 15:09.000
|
|
to trying to spread the message of this is what we've got to figure out.
|
|
|
|
15:09.000 --> 15:12.000
|
|
We've got to figure out who did this, where it came from.
|
|
|
|
15:12.000 --> 15:15.000
|
|
It's very important.
|
|
|
|
15:15.000 --> 15:19.000
|
|
And a couple times I decided that it wasn't important where it came from
|
|
|
|
15:19.000 --> 15:22.000
|
|
because of the biology that they were telling us.
|
|
|
|
15:22.000 --> 15:25.000
|
|
And a couple times I became convinced by other people that no,
|
|
|
|
15:25.000 --> 15:28.000
|
|
maybe it is really important to figure it out.
|
|
|
|
15:28.000 --> 15:32.000
|
|
In the end, I've come to the conclusion that there isn't anything to figure out.
|
|
|
|
15:32.000 --> 15:37.000
|
|
And in fact, it's that urge to figure it out, which was the trap,
|
|
|
|
15:37.000 --> 15:40.000
|
|
that they tried to suck everyone into.
|
|
|
|
15:40.000 --> 15:43.000
|
|
And if you didn't get sucked into it, that's fine.
|
|
|
|
15:43.000 --> 15:48.000
|
|
You were most likely going to believe it was natural and didn't want to get sucked into it
|
|
|
|
15:48.000 --> 15:52.000
|
|
was a scary discussion.
|
|
|
|
15:52.000 --> 15:56.000
|
|
But if you did get sucked into it, it was almost inevitable that you would come
|
|
|
|
15:56.000 --> 15:59.000
|
|
to the conclusion that this was a lab leak.
|
|
|
|
15:59.000 --> 16:02.000
|
|
The only question of whether or not it was a lab leak of a natural virus
|
|
|
|
16:02.000 --> 16:06.000
|
|
from a bad cave in the Mojang province of China,
|
|
|
|
16:06.000 --> 16:10.000
|
|
or whether it was a genetically altered or some kind of chimeric virus
|
|
|
|
16:10.000 --> 16:14.000
|
|
or a virus with a genetically altered spike protein
|
|
|
|
16:14.000 --> 16:21.000
|
|
with inserts from HIV that was released inadvertently in a Wuhan laboratory
|
|
|
|
16:21.000 --> 16:26.000
|
|
or maybe brought to the market in Wuhan.
|
|
|
|
16:26.000 --> 16:30.000
|
|
And so this is the story that people have been figuring out for the last three years.
|
|
|
|
16:30.000 --> 16:32.000
|
|
I've been trying to figure that out.
|
|
|
|
16:32.000 --> 16:38.000
|
|
You are forced to accept the faith of the Scooby-Doo episode.
|
|
|
|
16:38.000 --> 16:43.000
|
|
And the faith of the Scooby-Doo episode is there's a novel virus.
|
|
|
|
16:43.000 --> 16:45.000
|
|
We had to shut down.
|
|
|
|
16:45.000 --> 16:49.000
|
|
My goodness, thank goodness we did.
|
|
|
|
16:49.000 --> 16:52.000
|
|
And although we had no idea what to do about it,
|
|
|
|
16:52.000 --> 16:56.000
|
|
we had no idea what medicines would work.
|
|
|
|
16:56.000 --> 17:01.000
|
|
Warp speed brought about a mRNA vaccine
|
|
|
|
17:01.000 --> 17:05.000
|
|
that saved the day, that saved millions of lives,
|
|
|
|
17:05.000 --> 17:09.000
|
|
and that, you know, the adenovirus ones, they didn't work so well
|
|
|
|
17:09.000 --> 17:13.000
|
|
because people got some clots, so they pulled those off the market.
|
|
|
|
17:13.000 --> 17:17.000
|
|
And we saw that they lied about where this virus came from
|
|
|
|
17:17.000 --> 17:21.000
|
|
and those lies seemed to reveal the same thing
|
|
|
|
17:21.000 --> 17:25.000
|
|
that that leaked diffuse proposal seems to reveal,
|
|
|
|
17:25.000 --> 17:29.000
|
|
and that is that the United States couldn't make it here
|
|
|
|
17:29.000 --> 17:33.000
|
|
because the laws were changed and the regulations were changed
|
|
|
|
17:33.000 --> 17:36.000
|
|
and so they shipped this over to China
|
|
|
|
17:36.000 --> 17:40.000
|
|
and made this in a lab in China.
|
|
|
|
17:40.000 --> 17:44.000
|
|
And the diffuse proposal shows clearly that they were going to insert
|
|
|
|
17:44.000 --> 17:48.000
|
|
fear and cleavage sites into lots of different bat viruses
|
|
|
|
17:48.000 --> 17:50.000
|
|
and then spray them back into caves.
|
|
|
|
17:50.000 --> 17:54.000
|
|
So it makes perfect sense that EcoHealth Alliance did this
|
|
|
|
17:54.000 --> 17:57.000
|
|
with USAID money in cooperation with the lab in Wuhan
|
|
|
|
17:57.000 --> 17:59.000
|
|
because that's where it leaked from.
|
|
|
|
17:59.000 --> 18:02.000
|
|
John Stewart could even figure it out.
|
|
|
|
18:02.000 --> 18:05.000
|
|
But then we debated about it and argued about it
|
|
|
|
18:05.000 --> 18:09.000
|
|
and insisted that that's ridiculous for two and a half years
|
|
|
|
18:09.000 --> 18:13.000
|
|
or a year and a half to get everybody fired up.
|
|
|
|
18:13.000 --> 18:18.000
|
|
And in reality, misinformation and disinformation
|
|
|
|
18:18.000 --> 18:23.000
|
|
is carrying people to believe things that are untrue.
|
|
|
|
18:23.000 --> 18:27.000
|
|
And vaccinations is a perfect example of it.
|
|
|
|
18:27.000 --> 18:29.000
|
|
Like any.
|
|
|
|
18:29.000 --> 18:33.000
|
|
And so taking an extreme position like this
|
|
|
|
18:34.000 --> 18:38.000
|
|
person did is part of this narrative.
|
|
|
|
18:38.000 --> 18:41.000
|
|
It gets people, the extreme positions,
|
|
|
|
18:41.000 --> 18:46.000
|
|
define the space within which people are arguing
|
|
|
|
18:46.000 --> 18:49.000
|
|
and make it much more likely for people to take a central position
|
|
|
|
18:49.000 --> 18:53.000
|
|
between those two, whatever extremes they are.
|
|
|
|
18:53.000 --> 18:57.000
|
|
And of course then the extreme positions are,
|
|
|
|
18:57.000 --> 19:01.000
|
|
on one hand, you have Trudeau and Sam Harris saying,
|
|
|
|
19:01.000 --> 19:04.000
|
|
oh my goodness, you people are idiots.
|
|
|
|
19:04.000 --> 19:09.000
|
|
And on the other hand, you have people saying that Robert F.
|
|
|
|
19:09.000 --> 19:16.000
|
|
Kennedy Jr. and ICANN network and CHD are crazy anti-vaxxers
|
|
|
|
19:16.000 --> 19:19.000
|
|
who don't believe in medicine.
|
|
|
|
19:19.000 --> 19:22.000
|
|
And so then somewhere in between here,
|
|
|
|
19:22.000 --> 19:25.000
|
|
you decide, well, there's obviously a virus.
|
|
|
|
19:25.000 --> 19:27.000
|
|
I mean, there are obviously other ones
|
|
|
|
19:27.000 --> 19:30.000
|
|
that would be arguing about then if there wasn't a virus.
|
|
|
|
19:31.000 --> 19:32.000
|
|
That's the debate.
|
|
|
|
19:32.000 --> 19:36.000
|
|
And that's the perfect reason why these people took such extreme positions
|
|
|
|
19:36.000 --> 19:39.000
|
|
that made everybody go, oh,
|
|
|
|
19:39.000 --> 19:42.000
|
|
it's the exact same effect that Trump has on some people,
|
|
|
|
19:42.000 --> 19:45.000
|
|
but they did it with the biology
|
|
|
|
19:45.000 --> 19:48.000
|
|
and the absurdity of the certainty
|
|
|
|
19:48.000 --> 19:51.000
|
|
that none of these people could have had.
|
|
|
|
19:51.000 --> 19:53.000
|
|
Think about this as a couple of weeks ago.
|
|
|
|
19:53.000 --> 19:55.000
|
|
A week ago or two weeks ago,
|
|
|
|
19:55.000 --> 19:57.000
|
|
so many of us would like to leave it in the past,
|
|
|
|
19:57.000 --> 20:00.000
|
|
but cases are once again on the rise.
|
|
|
|
20:00.000 --> 20:02.000
|
|
So when will new booster shots roll out?
|
|
|
|
20:02.000 --> 20:06.000
|
|
And Thompson asked the CDC director.
|
|
|
|
20:06.000 --> 20:09.000
|
|
This summer, most Americans left COVID in the past,
|
|
|
|
20:09.000 --> 20:12.000
|
|
gathering together once again, mask-free.
|
|
|
|
20:12.000 --> 20:15.000
|
|
But tonight, signs of a COVID resurgence.
|
|
|
|
20:15.000 --> 20:17.000
|
|
Across the country, COVID hospitalizations
|
|
|
|
20:17.000 --> 20:21.000
|
|
jumped more than 14% in the most recent week.
|
|
|
|
20:21.000 --> 20:23.000
|
|
I mean, that could have been, sorry.
|
|
|
|
20:23.000 --> 20:26.000
|
|
You know, but that could have been anybody.
|
|
|
|
20:27.000 --> 20:30.000
|
|
That could have been anybody on that cart.
|
|
|
|
20:30.000 --> 20:34.000
|
|
We don't even know what hospital or where that was
|
|
|
|
20:34.000 --> 20:36.000
|
|
or what year that video was shot.
|
|
|
|
20:36.000 --> 20:39.000
|
|
I'll play that a little bit. Sorry about that.
|
|
|
|
20:42.000 --> 20:44.000
|
|
COVID is making a comeback this summer,
|
|
|
|
20:44.000 --> 20:46.000
|
|
so many of us would like to leave it in the past,
|
|
|
|
20:46.000 --> 20:49.000
|
|
but cases are once again on the rise.
|
|
|
|
20:49.000 --> 20:52.000
|
|
So when will new booster shots roll out?
|
|
|
|
20:52.000 --> 20:55.000
|
|
And Thompson asked the CDC director.
|
|
|
|
20:55.000 --> 20:58.000
|
|
This summer, most Americans left COVID in the past.
|
|
|
|
20:58.000 --> 21:01.000
|
|
This is from about, I think, two weeks ago, or maybe three,
|
|
|
|
21:01.000 --> 21:03.000
|
|
but the point is the same.
|
|
|
|
21:03.000 --> 21:04.000
|
|
They're running.
|
|
|
|
21:04.000 --> 21:06.000
|
|
They've been running up the story again,
|
|
|
|
21:06.000 --> 21:08.000
|
|
and they're continuing to do it now.
|
|
|
|
21:08.000 --> 21:10.000
|
|
We can look at that.
|
|
|
|
21:10.000 --> 21:12.000
|
|
But far lower than pandemic levels,
|
|
|
|
21:12.000 --> 21:16.000
|
|
NBC News medical contributor Dr. Kavita Patel.
|
|
|
|
21:16.000 --> 21:19.000
|
|
What's behind this uptick in COVID that we're seeing?
|
|
|
|
21:19.000 --> 21:23.000
|
|
The main driver of this is a variant that's relatively newer
|
|
|
|
21:23.000 --> 21:25.000
|
|
to the scene, EG5.
|
|
|
|
21:25.000 --> 21:28.000
|
|
It's easier to give and get, so that makes it kind of easier
|
|
|
|
21:28.000 --> 21:29.000
|
|
to pass along.
|
|
|
|
21:29.000 --> 21:33.000
|
|
It's been almost a year since the last COVID booster came out.
|
|
|
|
21:33.000 --> 21:35.000
|
|
CDC director Dr. Mandy Cohen.
|
|
|
|
21:35.000 --> 21:38.000
|
|
The new COVID booster is expected to be approved by the FDA,
|
|
|
|
21:38.000 --> 21:41.000
|
|
and then we will make recommendations from the CDC
|
|
|
|
21:41.000 --> 21:43.000
|
|
probably by the second or third week of September.
|
|
|
|
21:43.000 --> 21:46.000
|
|
Will it protect against this new strain?
|
|
|
|
21:46.000 --> 21:47.000
|
|
Yes.
|
|
|
|
21:47.000 --> 21:50.000
|
|
The booster is tailored to what we are seeing circulating now.
|
|
|
|
21:50.000 --> 21:54.000
|
|
Critics say the federal government is behind once again.
|
|
|
|
21:54.000 --> 21:57.000
|
|
People knew there was going to be a COVID resurgence,
|
|
|
|
21:57.000 --> 21:59.000
|
|
so why don't we have a booster today?
|
|
|
|
21:59.000 --> 22:01.000
|
|
Why do we have to wait until next month?
|
|
|
|
22:01.000 --> 22:04.000
|
|
The way we go about doing our, just like we do with our flu shots,
|
|
|
|
22:04.000 --> 22:06.000
|
|
right, we make sure that we're looking at the ways
|
|
|
|
22:06.000 --> 22:08.000
|
|
in which the virus changed.
|
|
|
|
22:08.000 --> 22:10.000
|
|
They look at and evaluate that.
|
|
|
|
22:10.000 --> 22:11.000
|
|
The FDA is doing its work.
|
|
|
|
22:11.000 --> 22:15.000
|
|
We likely will see this as an annual COVID shot,
|
|
|
|
22:15.000 --> 22:16.000
|
|
just like the flu shot.
|
|
|
|
22:16.000 --> 22:19.000
|
|
Just in time for Paul, when we'll also face RSV.
|
|
|
|
22:19.000 --> 22:24.000
|
|
Can you take the flu shot, the COVID booster and the RSV vaccine
|
|
|
|
22:24.000 --> 22:25.000
|
|
all at once?
|
|
|
|
22:25.000 --> 22:29.000
|
|
So for flu and COVID, yes, RSV again is only available for older adults.
|
|
|
|
22:29.000 --> 22:33.000
|
|
That's one where I'd say talk to your doctor about what's right for you.
|
|
|
|
22:33.000 --> 22:37.000
|
|
So until the new COVID booster comes, get prepared,
|
|
|
|
22:37.000 --> 22:39.000
|
|
stock up on at home test.
|
|
|
|
22:39.000 --> 22:40.000
|
|
They do cover that new strain.
|
|
|
|
22:40.000 --> 22:43.000
|
|
Keep a mask handy in case you're in a crowded place,
|
|
|
|
22:43.000 --> 22:45.000
|
|
and most of all, get your shots.
|
|
|
|
22:45.000 --> 22:50.000
|
|
COVID flu and RSV all by Halloween to give yourself
|
|
|
|
22:50.000 --> 22:52.000
|
|
your best chance of staying healthy.
|
|
|
|
22:52.000 --> 22:54.000
|
|
So she said it right there, right?
|
|
|
|
22:54.000 --> 22:56.000
|
|
She told everybody you get all of your shots.
|
|
|
|
22:56.000 --> 22:58.000
|
|
No age, no nothing.
|
|
|
|
22:58.000 --> 23:00.000
|
|
Don't see your doctor.
|
|
|
|
23:00.000 --> 23:04.000
|
|
Just get all your shots like you're a, I don't know,
|
|
|
|
23:04.000 --> 23:06.000
|
|
a dog going to a pound or something.
|
|
|
|
23:06.000 --> 23:08.000
|
|
It's impressive.
|
|
|
|
23:08.000 --> 23:14.000
|
|
The way that they're pushing it now, have a mask in case you're in
|
|
|
|
23:14.000 --> 23:15.000
|
|
crowded position.
|
|
|
|
23:15.000 --> 23:16.000
|
|
I mean, it's impressive.
|
|
|
|
23:16.000 --> 23:18.000
|
|
And this is 2023.
|
|
|
|
23:18.000 --> 23:20.000
|
|
This isn't a year ago or something like that.
|
|
|
|
23:20.000 --> 23:22.000
|
|
Either the COVID never went away.
|
|
|
|
23:22.000 --> 23:23.000
|
|
All right.
|
|
|
|
23:23.000 --> 23:24.000
|
|
And thank you.
|
|
|
|
23:24.000 --> 23:25.000
|
|
That's pretty scary.
|
|
|
|
23:25.000 --> 23:26.000
|
|
Thanks for watching.
|
|
|
|
23:26.000 --> 23:27.000
|
|
Are you?
|
|
|
|
23:27.000 --> 23:30.000
|
|
So here's, here's Sam Harris, what I was talking about.
|
|
|
|
23:30.000 --> 23:33.000
|
|
Dial up the, the deadliness of the pathogen.
|
|
|
|
23:33.000 --> 23:37.000
|
|
You know, give us something like, you know, airborne Ebola.
|
|
|
|
23:37.000 --> 23:41.000
|
|
Now the reason why, oops, darn it, I'm a little, little weak on the
|
|
|
|
23:41.000 --> 23:43.000
|
|
trigger here tonight.
|
|
|
|
23:44.000 --> 23:45.000
|
|
You know, but.
|
|
|
|
23:45.000 --> 23:54.000
|
|
So he says, he says, dial up the, the deadliness of the pathogen.
|
|
|
|
23:54.000 --> 23:58.000
|
|
You know, give us something like, you know, airborne Ebola.
|
|
|
|
23:58.000 --> 24:00.000
|
|
Airborne Ebola.
|
|
|
|
24:00.000 --> 24:09.000
|
|
So we heard, um, Robert Malone talk about airborne Ebola with
|
|
|
|
24:09.000 --> 24:17.000
|
|
even Hatfield, we heard, um, I've heard actually also, uh, who's
|
|
|
|
24:17.000 --> 24:23.000
|
|
the guy from Minnesota, um, Ulster home has also talked about
|
|
|
|
24:23.000 --> 24:31.000
|
|
airborne Ebola and I'm sure I actually have heard someone else say
|
|
|
|
24:31.000 --> 24:33.000
|
|
something like airborne Ebola.
|
|
|
|
24:33.000 --> 24:38.000
|
|
So you can almost be sure at some point that, uh, that's going to
|
|
|
|
24:38.000 --> 24:39.000
|
|
come into the story.
|
|
|
|
24:39.000 --> 24:42.000
|
|
It's, it's ridiculous for him to have mentioned it, but maybe just
|
|
|
|
24:42.000 --> 24:44.000
|
|
because he listens to those podcasts too.
|
|
|
|
24:44.000 --> 24:45.000
|
|
I don't know.
|
|
|
|
24:45.000 --> 24:49.000
|
|
So his, uh, man, I'm really blowing it with this because my
|
|
|
|
24:49.000 --> 24:50.000
|
|
head's in the way.
|
|
|
|
24:50.000 --> 24:57.000
|
|
So in this video, the interesting thing about what Sam says is that
|
|
|
|
24:57.000 --> 25:01.000
|
|
he says, if everything was perfect or if this was super dangerous,
|
|
|
|
25:01.000 --> 25:05.000
|
|
then nobody would be able to, uh, object to taking vaccines.
|
|
|
|
25:06.000 --> 25:11.000
|
|
And it's really just like saying, you know, if, if we could implant a
|
|
|
|
25:11.000 --> 25:16.000
|
|
chip in your head that was the size of a human hair and was
|
|
|
|
25:16.000 --> 25:22.000
|
|
completely inert, guaranteed not to hurt you, but could make you
|
|
|
|
25:22.000 --> 25:28.000
|
|
super smart, uh, and, and live for a hundred years, there would be
|
|
|
|
25:28.000 --> 25:31.000
|
|
nobody on the earth who wouldn't take it, especially if it did
|
|
|
|
25:31.000 --> 25:32.000
|
|
only cost 50 cents.
|
|
|
|
25:32.000 --> 25:33.000
|
|
Yeah.
|
|
|
|
25:33.000 --> 25:34.000
|
|
Okay.
|
|
|
|
25:34.000 --> 25:35.000
|
|
You're right about all.
|
|
|
|
25:35.000 --> 25:36.000
|
|
They were right about that.
|
|
|
|
25:36.000 --> 25:40.000
|
|
If you, if you had a little chip the size of a human hair that you
|
|
|
|
25:40.000 --> 25:43.000
|
|
could implant on somebody's head that didn't have to go in the head
|
|
|
|
25:43.000 --> 25:47.000
|
|
that could make somebody super smart and it only cost 50 cents,
|
|
|
|
25:47.000 --> 25:50.000
|
|
then you would be crazy not to have one.
|
|
|
|
25:50.000 --> 25:51.000
|
|
Yes.
|
|
|
|
25:51.000 --> 25:52.000
|
|
That's so what?
|
|
|
|
25:52.000 --> 25:54.000
|
|
That, that, what does that even mean?
|
|
|
|
25:54.000 --> 25:57.000
|
|
And so he says, well, you know, if there's a airborne Ebola that's
|
|
|
|
25:57.000 --> 26:03.000
|
|
65% deadly or you have super safe vaccines, then there'll be no
|
|
|
|
26:03.000 --> 26:04.000
|
|
excuse not to take them.
|
|
|
|
26:04.000 --> 26:05.000
|
|
Okay.
|
|
|
|
26:05.000 --> 26:09.000
|
|
So what if intramuscular injection of any combination of
|
|
|
|
26:09.000 --> 26:13.000
|
|
substances in order to ignore, uh, augment the immune system is
|
|
|
|
26:13.000 --> 26:14.000
|
|
dumb?
|
|
|
|
26:14.000 --> 26:19.000
|
|
What if you just look at how the immune system is arranged and
|
|
|
|
26:19.000 --> 26:22.000
|
|
look at how it operates and realize that you need to interact
|
|
|
|
26:22.000 --> 26:26.000
|
|
with that a barrier and that we need to reformulate and rethink
|
|
|
|
26:26.000 --> 26:32.000
|
|
our attempting to vaccinate and then really make choices about
|
|
|
|
26:32.000 --> 26:38.000
|
|
and, and with what and against what we vaccinate.
|
|
|
|
26:38.000 --> 26:43.000
|
|
And, and I think this is really the issue here because a lot of
|
|
|
|
26:43.000 --> 26:44.000
|
|
money is made.
|
|
|
|
26:44.000 --> 26:46.000
|
|
A lot of guaranteed money is made.
|
|
|
|
26:46.000 --> 26:51.000
|
|
And it's a, you know, it's something that people don't want to
|
|
|
|
26:51.000 --> 26:55.000
|
|
lose just like monopolies on antibodies or something that a lot
|
|
|
|
26:55.000 --> 26:56.000
|
|
of people didn't want to lose.
|
|
|
|
26:56.000 --> 26:59.000
|
|
But now that they're gone, anybody that wants to make antibodies can
|
|
|
|
26:59.000 --> 27:02.000
|
|
probably make them as long as they got good enough lawyers, they can
|
|
|
|
27:02.000 --> 27:04.000
|
|
make whatever they want now.
|
|
|
|
27:04.000 --> 27:07.000
|
|
And that's probably part of what's happening here.
|
|
|
|
27:07.000 --> 27:11.000
|
|
So in this case, you're just going to hear Sam Harris talk like an
|
|
|
|
27:11.000 --> 27:12.000
|
|
absolute moron.
|
|
|
|
27:12.000 --> 27:15.000
|
|
But again, what is the point?
|
|
|
|
27:15.000 --> 27:21.000
|
|
The point is to take this extreme position so that all of us feel
|
|
|
|
27:21.000 --> 27:26.000
|
|
very natural taking a position in between his and the other extreme.
|
|
|
|
27:26.000 --> 27:32.000
|
|
And as long as the narrative control mechanism makes it very
|
|
|
|
27:32.000 --> 27:37.000
|
|
easy for people who are kind of passively looking to see what the
|
|
|
|
27:37.000 --> 27:41.000
|
|
other end of the, of the spectrum is, you're trapped.
|
|
|
|
27:41.000 --> 27:47.000
|
|
As soon as you see crazy people over here at anti-vaxxers on one side
|
|
|
|
27:47.000 --> 27:51.000
|
|
and on the other side, you see crazy people like Sam Harris.
|
|
|
|
27:51.000 --> 27:53.000
|
|
You're trapped in between them.
|
|
|
|
27:53.000 --> 27:55.000
|
|
You got no power.
|
|
|
|
27:55.000 --> 27:56.000
|
|
It's no problem at all.
|
|
|
|
27:56.000 --> 28:00.000
|
|
You'll take a digital ID and digital currency when the time comes.
|
|
|
|
28:00.000 --> 28:02.000
|
|
Jobged up.
|
|
|
|
28:02.000 --> 28:05.000
|
|
And we need to be on the outside of that spectrum.
|
|
|
|
28:05.000 --> 28:08.000
|
|
We need to be on the outside of that spectrum where we understand that
|
|
|
|
28:08.000 --> 28:13.000
|
|
the biology that keeps people there is nonsense.
|
|
|
|
28:14.000 --> 28:18.000
|
|
The people, the biology that he's going to talk about right now is
|
|
|
|
28:18.000 --> 28:22.000
|
|
completely mythological.
|
|
|
|
28:22.000 --> 28:28.000
|
|
And the biology that is described disingenuously about the people
|
|
|
|
28:28.000 --> 28:33.000
|
|
who are anti-vaxx is also, it's not plausible.
|
|
|
|
28:33.000 --> 28:34.000
|
|
It's crazy.
|
|
|
|
28:34.000 --> 28:41.000
|
|
And so you try to create this trap that's based on two really crazy
|
|
|
|
28:41.000 --> 28:47.000
|
|
positions you can't take anyway so that you take this one in between.
|
|
|
|
28:52.000 --> 28:57.000
|
|
You know, if you don't let trans kids be trans kids and you're a,
|
|
|
|
28:57.000 --> 28:59.000
|
|
you hate kids or something like that.
|
|
|
|
28:59.000 --> 29:04.000
|
|
It's a ridiculous, it's a ridiculous position to take.
|
|
|
|
29:04.000 --> 29:10.000
|
|
But these ridiculous positions create this, create these spaces of debate
|
|
|
|
29:10.000 --> 29:17.000
|
|
that are hypothetical and real to the people inside of them,
|
|
|
|
29:17.000 --> 29:19.000
|
|
but ridiculous on their face.
|
|
|
|
29:19.000 --> 29:22.000
|
|
They, to keep and get us to argue about this,
|
|
|
|
29:22.000 --> 29:25.000
|
|
this, what he talks about is ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
29:25.000 --> 29:27.000
|
|
But that's his job.
|
|
|
|
29:27.000 --> 29:32.000
|
|
And I'm taking a lot of time because I really want to make this point that
|
|
|
|
29:32.000 --> 29:35.000
|
|
it's not always the position that these people take.
|
|
|
|
29:35.000 --> 29:37.000
|
|
It's where they shine the flashlight.
|
|
|
|
29:37.000 --> 29:42.000
|
|
And if there's enough space over there for the flashlight to go all the way over
|
|
|
|
29:42.000 --> 29:47.000
|
|
to another cavern, and it's a cavern that doesn't lead out,
|
|
|
|
29:47.000 --> 29:52.000
|
|
then why not, that's why they say why not shine my flashlight over there?
|
|
|
|
29:52.000 --> 29:56.000
|
|
And so he's going to shine his flashlight way over there where there's
|
|
|
|
29:56.000 --> 30:02.000
|
|
airborne Ebola and it's killing 50% of the kids and listen to this.
|
|
|
|
30:02.000 --> 30:06.000
|
|
And bodies of kids are piling up in the street shining his light over
|
|
|
|
30:06.000 --> 30:12.000
|
|
that hypothetical cavern over there and making us walk over there and explore it.
|
|
|
|
30:12.000 --> 30:16.000
|
|
Now, I'm not suggesting making us go over there and explore it.
|
|
|
|
30:16.000 --> 30:20.000
|
|
But what I'm saying is, is that having this person promoted on the Internet,
|
|
|
|
30:20.000 --> 30:27.000
|
|
getting attention, people listening to him, is his words going through people's heads
|
|
|
|
30:27.000 --> 30:33.000
|
|
and occupying one of those 39,000 thoughts that they have every day.
|
|
|
|
30:33.000 --> 30:38.000
|
|
And that's been going on for decades.
|
|
|
|
30:38.000 --> 30:44.000
|
|
And so this extreme position doesn't seem as extreme as it sounds to us
|
|
|
|
30:44.000 --> 30:49.000
|
|
because there are people out there who think exactly like Sam.
|
|
|
|
30:49.000 --> 30:54.000
|
|
And if you read these comments, you will see that lots of people think like him.
|
|
|
|
30:54.000 --> 31:01.000
|
|
Obviously, I don't, but it's important to hear how extreme this position is.
|
|
|
|
31:01.000 --> 31:06.000
|
|
Oh boy, I'm still failing miserably at directing my own show today.
|
|
|
|
31:06.000 --> 31:08.000
|
|
Horrible.
|
|
|
|
31:08.000 --> 31:14.000
|
|
Come on, really?
|
|
|
|
31:14.000 --> 31:19.000
|
|
This is like flunky town here.
|
|
|
|
31:19.000 --> 31:24.000
|
|
But dial up the deadliness of the pathogen.
|
|
|
|
31:24.000 --> 31:30.000
|
|
Give us something like airborne Ebola that incubates for a month.
|
|
|
|
31:30.000 --> 31:33.000
|
|
You don't know you have it, and you're what you walk around spreading it,
|
|
|
|
31:33.000 --> 31:38.000
|
|
and it's got a 75% fatality rate, and it's mostly killing kids.
|
|
|
|
31:38.000 --> 31:40.000
|
|
No one gets to make that choice anymore.
|
|
|
|
31:40.000 --> 31:45.000
|
|
I mean, then literally the cops come in and vaccinate you.
|
|
|
|
31:45.000 --> 31:50.000
|
|
Now, notice one of the things that he extended there very much longer than
|
|
|
|
31:50.000 --> 31:56.000
|
|
even the ridiculous stories that we were told was the asymptomatic spread of the virus.
|
|
|
|
31:56.000 --> 32:02.000
|
|
It incubates for a month where you spread the virus and you don't know you're spreading it.
|
|
|
|
32:02.000 --> 32:08.000
|
|
That part of the mythology, the fact that he even has it in there, in my mind,
|
|
|
|
32:08.000 --> 32:16.000
|
|
already tells you that this is a planted story because he's reinforcing asymptomatic spread
|
|
|
|
32:16.000 --> 32:19.000
|
|
even with his dumbassery.
|
|
|
|
32:19.000 --> 32:25.000
|
|
And so when people hear this and share it on social media, they're not even aware of the fact
|
|
|
|
32:25.000 --> 32:31.000
|
|
that Sam Harris' dumbassery is still reinforcing asymptomatic spread,
|
|
|
|
32:31.000 --> 32:35.000
|
|
and you just think that asymptomatic spread for a month would be ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
32:35.000 --> 32:37.000
|
|
That's crazy biology.
|
|
|
|
32:37.000 --> 32:43.000
|
|
But asymptomatic spread for a week with COVID is fine, right?
|
|
|
|
32:43.000 --> 32:46.000
|
|
No.
|
|
|
|
32:46.000 --> 32:48.000
|
|
It's not right.
|
|
|
|
32:48.000 --> 32:54.000
|
|
But that's the magic spell that happens even when people take the ridiculous positions
|
|
|
|
32:54.000 --> 32:57.000
|
|
that Trudeau does and that Sam does.
|
|
|
|
32:57.000 --> 33:04.000
|
|
Listen carefully, see if you can find other examples of that where the mythology is reinforced
|
|
|
|
33:04.000 --> 33:08.000
|
|
even by his ridiculousness.
|
|
|
|
33:08.000 --> 33:12.000
|
|
25% fatality rate, and it's mostly that incubates for a month.
|
|
|
|
33:12.000 --> 33:16.000
|
|
You don't know you have it and you're what you walk around spreading it, and it's got
|
|
|
|
33:16.000 --> 33:21.000
|
|
a 75% fatality rate, and it's mostly killing kids.
|
|
|
|
33:21.000 --> 33:23.000
|
|
No one gets to make that choice anymore.
|
|
|
|
33:23.000 --> 33:28.000
|
|
I mean, then literally the cops come in and vaccinate you.
|
|
|
|
33:28.000 --> 33:33.000
|
|
And I would say that all of us would agree to that.
|
|
|
|
33:33.000 --> 33:41.000
|
|
It's pretty funny because he purports to be so smart, but imagine what he just said.
|
|
|
|
33:41.000 --> 33:46.000
|
|
It's a 75% fatality rate, but it incubates for a month and you can spread it.
|
|
|
|
33:46.000 --> 33:51.000
|
|
So after a month, where is it?
|
|
|
|
33:51.000 --> 33:53.000
|
|
Is it everywhere?
|
|
|
|
33:53.000 --> 33:54.000
|
|
Once it gets on an airplane, right?
|
|
|
|
33:54.000 --> 33:59.000
|
|
I mean, how many times did it have to get on an airplane in a month?
|
|
|
|
33:59.000 --> 34:01.000
|
|
Is it everywhere?
|
|
|
|
34:01.000 --> 34:06.000
|
|
Isn't every like 75% of the people dead are infected already by the end of the one?
|
|
|
|
34:06.000 --> 34:11.000
|
|
What scenario is that where warps speed in nine months gets us anywhere?
|
|
|
|
34:11.000 --> 34:14.000
|
|
Warps speed in nine weeks.
|
|
|
|
34:14.000 --> 34:16.000
|
|
I mean, it's just, it's silly talk, right?
|
|
|
|
34:16.000 --> 34:24.000
|
|
But again, what I'm trying to say is that what Sam Harris is reinforcing is how wide
|
|
|
|
34:24.000 --> 34:35.000
|
|
the potential is that an RNA molecule could go anywhere from infecting millions of people
|
|
|
|
34:35.000 --> 34:43.000
|
|
in three years and killing millions, or it could incubate for a month and spread without
|
|
|
|
34:43.000 --> 34:48.000
|
|
symptoms and also kill 75% of the people it infects.
|
|
|
|
34:48.000 --> 34:58.000
|
|
And so the hypothetical parameter space that a virus can occupy has just been expanded greatly
|
|
|
|
34:58.000 --> 35:02.000
|
|
by Sam Harris' dumbassery.
|
|
|
|
35:02.000 --> 35:11.000
|
|
He's reinforced the idea that asymptomatic spread is possible by giving you a ridiculous
|
|
|
|
35:11.000 --> 35:13.000
|
|
scenario of asymptomatic spread.
|
|
|
|
35:13.000 --> 35:18.000
|
|
But then nonetheless, if you argue with him about it, even in your head subconsciously,
|
|
|
|
35:18.000 --> 35:23.000
|
|
you're accepting the existence of that principle.
|
|
|
|
35:23.000 --> 35:29.000
|
|
And that goes the same with the lethality of the virus being 75%.
|
|
|
|
35:29.000 --> 35:34.000
|
|
And the consequences of that and the potential of that and how would that work?
|
|
|
|
35:34.000 --> 35:40.000
|
|
That an RNA molecule can be 75% lethal to those mammals exposed to it?
|
|
|
|
35:40.000 --> 35:46.000
|
|
What kind of weakness would be built into our immune system if that was the case?
|
|
|
|
35:46.000 --> 35:54.000
|
|
What kind of diabolical, sinister, synthetic thing would be able to do that?
|
|
|
|
35:54.000 --> 36:00.000
|
|
Just think about that, the absurdity of it, and yet he's very happy to spew that out.
|
|
|
|
36:00.000 --> 36:05.000
|
|
Why? Because it pushes this narrative faith down the road.
|
|
|
|
36:05.000 --> 36:13.000
|
|
If you don't accept the existence of viruses and you accept that they can be released and go around the world,
|
|
|
|
36:13.000 --> 36:19.000
|
|
and the only debate is how bad can they really be, then you're ruleable.
|
|
|
|
36:19.000 --> 36:25.000
|
|
Your kids will be ruleable by this mythology because they just have to tell you a scarier story next time.
|
|
|
|
36:25.000 --> 36:29.000
|
|
They just have to turn the screws a little tighter next time because you've already accepted
|
|
|
|
36:29.000 --> 36:32.000
|
|
that the boogeyman is there.
|
|
|
|
36:32.000 --> 36:37.000
|
|
And that's not that there are no viruses, it's that viruses can't pandemic.
|
|
|
|
36:37.000 --> 36:44.000
|
|
RNA molecules don't do this, not even when they're really nicely coded.
|
|
|
|
36:44.000 --> 36:48.000
|
|
Let's keep listening to his absurdity because it's important to learn from it.
|
|
|
|
36:48.000 --> 36:53.000
|
|
The moment, again, that you turn up the lethality on the pathogen,
|
|
|
|
36:53.000 --> 36:58.000
|
|
you turn up the effectiveness of the vaccine, you turn down the risk of the vaccine,
|
|
|
|
36:58.000 --> 37:05.000
|
|
give me a truly safe vaccine where there's not even one documented case of vaccine injury, right?
|
|
|
|
37:05.000 --> 37:11.000
|
|
So then you just have to be completely crazy to be worried about being vaccinated.
|
|
|
|
37:11.000 --> 37:17.000
|
|
So what's interesting about this position is then you have to almost be crazy to be worried about vaccination.
|
|
|
|
37:17.000 --> 37:25.000
|
|
So then if there are people who are vaccine injured and it's not an insignificant number of people,
|
|
|
|
37:25.000 --> 37:29.000
|
|
then you're not so crazy to be worried about it.
|
|
|
|
37:29.000 --> 37:32.000
|
|
And so in a way, he sort of slips up here, right?
|
|
|
|
37:32.000 --> 37:36.000
|
|
He kind of looks like a dipshit if you think about it.
|
|
|
|
37:36.000 --> 37:42.000
|
|
But again, it's the absurdity of it that's important so that no matter who talks about it,
|
|
|
|
37:42.000 --> 37:49.000
|
|
no matter who discusses it, whether this ball gets thrown to Tim Poole, he can say dumb stuff about it.
|
|
|
|
37:49.000 --> 37:51.000
|
|
The narrative will never be questioned.
|
|
|
|
37:51.000 --> 37:53.000
|
|
This ball can be tossed to Brett Weinstein.
|
|
|
|
37:53.000 --> 37:56.000
|
|
Brett Weinstein can say, boy, it's too bad.
|
|
|
|
37:56.000 --> 37:59.000
|
|
My friend Sam Harris is such a moron now.
|
|
|
|
37:59.000 --> 38:01.000
|
|
He's really brainwashed.
|
|
|
|
38:01.000 --> 38:04.000
|
|
And the narrative will never be questioned there.
|
|
|
|
38:04.000 --> 38:06.000
|
|
Either they're all on the faith.
|
|
|
|
38:06.000 --> 38:08.000
|
|
The ball can be thrown to someone like Sam Cedar.
|
|
|
|
38:08.000 --> 38:13.000
|
|
And he can whine even more about how Sam Harris gets picked on all the time.
|
|
|
|
38:13.000 --> 38:15.000
|
|
This makes perfect sense to me.
|
|
|
|
38:16.000 --> 38:25.000
|
|
And so the entire time this conversation of him that getting made fun of is actually a tool
|
|
|
|
38:25.000 --> 38:30.000
|
|
for all these other little people on the internet to amplify the same ideas
|
|
|
|
38:30.000 --> 38:37.000
|
|
and to talk about what these ideas mean or don't mean, just like I'm doing except
|
|
|
|
38:37.000 --> 38:43.000
|
|
they don't reveal the fact that this keeps you on the faith that there was a novel virus.
|
|
|
|
38:43.000 --> 38:44.000
|
|
We had to do something.
|
|
|
|
38:44.000 --> 38:45.000
|
|
mRNA did something.
|
|
|
|
38:45.000 --> 38:50.000
|
|
And it was gain a function so it could come again.
|
|
|
|
38:50.000 --> 39:00.000
|
|
I'm trying to explain to you why absurd behavior like this can exist and can be useful for them.
|
|
|
|
39:00.000 --> 39:09.000
|
|
Because this gets clicks, this gets listens, this gets complaints, this gets retweets, this gets quoted.
|
|
|
|
39:09.000 --> 39:12.000
|
|
And so doing, you're solving the mystery.
|
|
|
|
39:12.000 --> 39:14.000
|
|
You're in the argument.
|
|
|
|
39:14.000 --> 39:20.000
|
|
You're buying the premise that there are viruses that they can go around the world.
|
|
|
|
39:20.000 --> 39:29.000
|
|
It's only a question of how many people die or who's vulnerable, who's got the antibodies and who doesn't.
|
|
|
|
39:29.000 --> 39:31.000
|
|
And it might be about mandating stuff.
|
|
|
|
39:31.000 --> 39:36.000
|
|
Maybe you don't like mandating, but he's just saying if it's really dangerous and things work really well,
|
|
|
|
39:36.000 --> 39:39.000
|
|
then what's wrong with mandates?
|
|
|
|
39:39.000 --> 39:47.000
|
|
And once again, you're trapped.
|
|
|
|
39:47.000 --> 39:53.000
|
|
And so you've got to be really careful not to get trapped in this Scooby-Doo because if you do,
|
|
|
|
39:53.000 --> 39:58.000
|
|
then very quickly they're going to change the way you think about the rest of the way a respiratory disease develops
|
|
|
|
39:58.000 --> 39:59.000
|
|
and what causes it.
|
|
|
|
39:59.000 --> 40:04.000
|
|
You're going to be very quickly bamboozled in not thinking about all cause mortality anymore.
|
|
|
|
40:04.000 --> 40:12.000
|
|
You're going to be very quickly bamboozled into thinking about antibodies and not the actual way that your immune system works.
|
|
|
|
40:12.000 --> 40:16.000
|
|
And with regard to immunization and vaccination, they'll be the same thing.
|
|
|
|
40:16.000 --> 40:21.000
|
|
You're going to be bamboozled into thinking that mRNA is not bad in principle.
|
|
|
|
40:21.000 --> 40:23.000
|
|
That's their goal.
|
|
|
|
40:23.000 --> 40:29.000
|
|
You may have seen this video in Japan that are investigating the effects.
|
|
|
|
40:29.000 --> 40:34.000
|
|
Tonight we're getting to you guys.
|
|
|
|
40:35.280 --> 40:40.000
|
|
I will be here in 1.35 days.
|
|
|
|
40:40.000 --> 40:44.000
|
|
I'll talk to a few guys about the settings.
|
|
|
|
40:44.000 --> 40:48.000
|
|
The settings we've experienced are very quickly done.
|
|
|
|
40:48.000 --> 40:51.000
|
|
When you look at all of theallel seminars we're going to use for immunization.
|
|
|
|
40:51.000 --> 40:55.000
|
|
So just think about it carefully.
|
|
|
|
40:55.000 --> 41:02.760
|
|
Now, of course, this is kind of a fringy group, and so it's not clear to me how much traction this
|
|
|
|
41:02.760 --> 41:08.760
|
|
is really getting a mainstream Japan. Maybe we can find out from Kevin McCarran if he's covering
|
|
|
|
41:08.760 --> 41:13.240
|
|
any of this. Maybe somebody can let me know in the chat. But it does seem they're starting to
|
|
|
|
41:13.240 --> 41:19.320
|
|
realize a little too late that they were told to do something they shouldn't have been told to do.
|
|
|
|
41:19.960 --> 41:25.880
|
|
This, of course, has happened all around the world. And so it'll be interesting to see how that
|
|
|
|
41:25.880 --> 41:32.200
|
|
all rolls out again. These things, of course, allowed all of these other bad things to happen,
|
|
|
|
41:32.200 --> 41:38.040
|
|
and that's also part of the Scooby-Doo because they're not talking about how many people have
|
|
|
|
41:38.040 --> 41:43.720
|
|
been damaged by Remdesivir. There are currently two suits that I've been made aware of. One,
|
|
|
|
41:43.720 --> 41:50.600
|
|
which has to do with glass being in the Remdesivir preparation. And another one has to do with kidney
|
|
|
|
41:51.640 --> 41:55.480
|
|
malfunction, not being listed in the possible side effects of Remdesivir.
|
|
|
|
41:57.560 --> 42:03.960
|
|
But none of the suits are really going after the idea that Remdesivir is not appropriate for
|
|
|
|
42:03.960 --> 42:10.520
|
|
anything. The Remdesivir shouldn't have been given to anyone or anything like that. So I'm not
|
|
|
|
42:10.520 --> 42:17.080
|
|
really sure if those suits are going to do anything for everyone. But again, nobody's really
|
|
|
|
42:17.080 --> 42:24.200
|
|
trying to solve this. Where did this order to not use antibiotics come from? How widespread was
|
|
|
|
42:24.200 --> 42:29.640
|
|
it around the United States? Where was Remdesivir used and how widespread was it applied? Is it
|
|
|
|
42:29.640 --> 42:36.440
|
|
still being applied now and why? How many people were ventilated and never came out of their vent?
|
|
|
|
42:37.080 --> 42:43.400
|
|
We got to try and figure some of this stuff out, but right now we're not really trying to
|
|
|
|
42:43.400 --> 42:48.520
|
|
figure it out. That's the point. And again, they're not talking about certain things. That's how you
|
|
|
|
42:48.520 --> 42:55.000
|
|
get kept on the Scooby-Doo. If you don't talk about PCR and you're not talking about masking and
|
|
|
|
42:55.000 --> 42:59.960
|
|
lockdown and spread the lack of spread, if you're not talking about all this list,
|
|
|
|
43:00.760 --> 43:06.840
|
|
pretty much daily as part of your explanation for fifth-generation warfare,
|
|
|
|
43:06.840 --> 43:12.040
|
|
then you're not really explaining what fifth-generation warfare is all about. It's about
|
|
|
|
43:12.040 --> 43:18.920
|
|
creating monsters. It's about creating Scooby-Doo's so that the people think they're figuring stuff
|
|
|
|
43:18.920 --> 43:23.400
|
|
out and that people are getting caught and that the bad guys are going to jail
|
|
|
|
43:23.720 --> 43:33.640
|
|
and slowly but surely that Scooby-Doo thing is starting to change to like, you know,
|
|
|
|
43:34.200 --> 43:42.040
|
|
oh, they're using directed energy weapons to burn the shore of Maui and they're blowing up
|
|
|
|
43:42.040 --> 43:49.080
|
|
chemical trains in Ohio and they're polluting the waters and they're doing all this stuff because
|
|
|
|
43:49.080 --> 43:53.000
|
|
they're going to ruin all this stuff because they want us to run out of all of our stuff and
|
|
|
|
43:54.040 --> 44:02.760
|
|
maybe all of these things are true but in reality, in reality, the way that we check out is this
|
|
|
|
44:03.960 --> 44:09.480
|
|
because once we get rid of this public health thing, once that thing is all gone and we root
|
|
|
|
44:09.480 --> 44:16.760
|
|
that out of our system, most of the rot will be exposed. Most of the rotten people, most of the
|
|
|
|
44:16.840 --> 44:23.400
|
|
rotten programs, most of the rotten impotuses inside of that bureaucracy will be exposed
|
|
|
|
44:24.440 --> 44:28.200
|
|
and they want us to think about these other things. They want us to be worried about this other
|
|
|
|
44:28.200 --> 44:35.960
|
|
stuff but it's primarily our need to rein in our public health, the Department of Homeland Security,
|
|
|
|
44:36.760 --> 44:42.120
|
|
control our borders, get back control of our country again but definitely get back control
|
|
|
|
44:42.120 --> 44:47.800
|
|
of our biology because if we keep debating about viruses and we keep debating about
|
|
|
|
44:48.360 --> 44:53.880
|
|
gain of function and we keep debating about this stuff until we're done debating it,
|
|
|
|
44:54.440 --> 45:01.160
|
|
then all of these things will be out of our control by then. That's their plan even as they
|
|
|
|
45:01.160 --> 45:05.080
|
|
point to the who and say, see the who is doing it, the who's doing it. No, anybody could step
|
|
|
|
45:05.080 --> 45:10.920
|
|
out of the who whenever we wanted to. They want you to believe that if the who signed some papers
|
|
|
|
45:11.000 --> 45:16.040
|
|
or we signed some papers, it's like signing in blood and Satan is sitting at the table so once
|
|
|
|
45:16.040 --> 45:23.720
|
|
you do that, it's over. And I refuse to believe that that's the way the who is or the sepe is or
|
|
|
|
45:23.720 --> 45:29.640
|
|
the wef is. If we can get our act together as a country and just decide that we're going to lead
|
|
|
|
45:29.640 --> 45:38.120
|
|
the way out and we're going to try and figure out the out of our fiscal destructive position
|
|
|
|
45:38.120 --> 45:43.800
|
|
that we're in. Maybe there is no way out of it but goodness knows we need to extract some of the
|
|
|
|
45:43.800 --> 45:51.720
|
|
money that's been stolen from us from the oligarchs that stole it from us. We need to correct this
|
|
|
|
45:51.720 --> 45:57.000
|
|
wrong. We need to correct this wrong because there's, we don't know what's going on anymore.
|
|
|
|
45:57.960 --> 46:04.680
|
|
The average person on the street doesn't know what's going on anymore. Everything is corrupted,
|
|
|
|
46:04.680 --> 46:13.640
|
|
everything is a show. All the world's a stage and they lied to us about this pandemic and we need
|
|
|
|
46:13.640 --> 46:22.680
|
|
people to understand this maybe this year. Didn't I have it here? Didn't it? Oh yeah, sorry. So,
|
|
|
|
46:22.680 --> 46:26.360
|
|
you know, this is the way I'm going to I'm going to keep telling everybody to say it.
|
|
|
|
46:27.960 --> 46:33.160
|
|
And let's go on to the let's go on to the video. What's going on here? Why was the video not here?
|
|
|
|
46:34.040 --> 46:37.480
|
|
Sorry, I'm going to skip ahead here and see if I go there. Sorry.
|
|
|
|
46:39.880 --> 46:41.880
|
|
Here we go.
|
|
|
|
46:52.760 --> 47:00.200
|
|
And Philip Buckholt. So, this is a guy who I think confirmed a lot of the analysis that was done by
|
|
|
|
47:00.280 --> 47:07.880
|
|
Dr. Kevin McKernan. I shouldn't say Dr. Kevin McKernan because he didn't get his doctorate,
|
|
|
|
47:07.880 --> 47:11.400
|
|
but what difference does it make? He's earned his doctorate. So,
|
|
|
|
47:13.720 --> 47:23.880
|
|
Kevin McKernan, the guy who found the DNA in the vaccine shots that he was sent. It's interesting
|
|
|
|
47:23.880 --> 47:30.120
|
|
to note that the story of how he got the vaccines that he tested and found the DNA
|
|
|
|
47:30.120 --> 47:40.440
|
|
plasmid in has varied. The original story that I heard twice was that for an experiment that he
|
|
|
|
47:40.440 --> 47:52.280
|
|
was doing for his cannabis genetics company, he needed a polyA RNA control. And if you know
|
|
|
|
47:52.360 --> 47:57.480
|
|
anything about RNA, you know that if you wanted to get taken up by the ribosome, it needs to have
|
|
|
|
47:57.480 --> 48:09.480
|
|
a polyA tail for some reason. And so he needed a control and an anonymous person sent him
|
|
|
|
48:10.120 --> 48:17.480
|
|
vaccine miles in the mail. And that was very curious. He used them as a control and just because
|
|
|
|
48:17.480 --> 48:24.040
|
|
he used them as a control, they were also therefore in the sequencing reaction, you see.
|
|
|
|
48:24.840 --> 48:30.360
|
|
So the story is that he didn't even mean to sequence the vaccine. It's just that he got the
|
|
|
|
48:30.360 --> 48:37.960
|
|
vaccine and he was using it for a polyA RNA control. And then because it was already in there, it got
|
|
|
|
48:38.040 --> 48:49.000
|
|
sequenced. And when he sequenced it, he noticed that there wasn't just the spike protein RNA in
|
|
|
|
48:49.000 --> 48:57.400
|
|
there, but he noticed an SV40 promoter in that that led him to realize that it was DNA in there,
|
|
|
|
48:57.400 --> 49:02.920
|
|
I believe, could be wrong. He could have found DNA some other way and then look for something that
|
|
|
|
49:03.000 --> 49:07.960
|
|
he expected by being there like an easy one like that. I'm not sure exactly what direction it went.
|
|
|
|
49:07.960 --> 49:13.480
|
|
So let's listen to how he confirmed this. He's a pretty good guy. I think this is like 43 minutes,
|
|
|
|
49:13.480 --> 49:18.360
|
|
so I'm going to speed it up just a little. He's a good speaker though, so there's no reason to speed
|
|
|
|
49:18.360 --> 49:28.600
|
|
it up too much just to make it peppy. So a little bit of what am I doing here? For those of you
|
|
|
|
49:28.600 --> 49:34.360
|
|
who don't know me, my name is Philip McCall. I have a PhD in biochemistry, molecular biology.
|
|
|
|
49:35.400 --> 49:39.400
|
|
I'm a cancer gene jock. Basically, I do cancer genomics research at the University of South Carolina.
|
|
|
|
49:39.960 --> 49:44.040
|
|
And what that means is that I'm kind of an expert on all the ways that the human genome can get
|
|
|
|
49:44.040 --> 49:48.120
|
|
fussed with during your lifetime and which of those things cause cancer and which ones don't.
|
|
|
|
49:48.120 --> 49:53.480
|
|
Okay. So technically, that means that I'm very, very skilled in the art of DNA sequencing.
|
|
|
|
49:53.480 --> 49:56.040
|
|
Okay, I can figure out the sequence of things that I didn't know what I was looking for.
|
|
|
|
49:56.840 --> 50:00.680
|
|
And I'm also pretty good when I say I, I mean, the people in my laboratory, you're not going to
|
|
|
|
50:00.680 --> 50:04.600
|
|
hear their names, but there's a group of people that do this excellent work. We're really good at
|
|
|
|
50:05.640 --> 50:09.960
|
|
detecting foreign pieces of DNA in places where they're not supposed to be, even if they're low
|
|
|
|
50:09.960 --> 50:17.480
|
|
levels. And we use those skills during the pandemic to, we invented the COVID test that many of you
|
|
|
|
50:17.480 --> 50:21.320
|
|
did a spit test. Okay, that came out of my lab because we were really good at that kind of stuff.
|
|
|
|
50:21.320 --> 50:28.360
|
|
And so I've earned a fair amount of respect in the state of South Carolina and in this body because
|
|
|
|
50:28.360 --> 50:32.120
|
|
we did a ton of COVID testing in the middle of the night when people were afraid and we told them,
|
|
|
|
50:32.120 --> 50:36.840
|
|
no, you don't have COVID in your home or yes, you do. So my qualifications to comment on this are
|
|
|
|
50:36.840 --> 50:39.720
|
|
both technical and kind of relational in the state of South Carolina.
|
|
|
|
50:45.080 --> 50:48.920
|
|
It leads me to believe that he might be a very interesting person to talk to because he said
|
|
|
|
50:48.920 --> 50:55.400
|
|
that he was testing for COVID, which means very likely he designed his own PCR test for it, which
|
|
|
|
50:55.400 --> 51:01.480
|
|
is cool. Because a lot of the people that were in academic biology at the time, we're all saying
|
|
|
|
51:01.480 --> 51:06.440
|
|
that, yeah, we could all do this on our benches. And then we'd save all this time waiting for these
|
|
|
|
51:06.440 --> 51:13.480
|
|
tests to be released. We could just do it. And the government definitely didn't want that to happen.
|
|
|
|
51:14.280 --> 51:19.240
|
|
I'll cut to a very narrow theme here, but it does touch on lots of these regulatory issues.
|
|
|
|
51:19.240 --> 51:23.800
|
|
And I'll leave it to you to expand on those if you want to. I'll try to stay in this narrow lane
|
|
|
|
51:24.600 --> 51:29.880
|
|
of some problems in the Pfizer vaccine as a case study for places in which regulatory oversight
|
|
|
|
51:29.880 --> 51:35.720
|
|
could be improved. Alright, so first of all, let me say that my interpretation of the literature is
|
|
|
|
51:35.720 --> 51:40.680
|
|
that the Pfizer vaccine did a pretty good job of keeping people from dying, but it did a terrible
|
|
|
|
51:40.680 --> 51:46.360
|
|
job of stopping the pandemic. The early publications showed that it stopped infection,
|
|
|
|
51:46.360 --> 51:50.040
|
|
but that only lasted for like a month. Could you pull the mic a little closer to you,
|
|
|
|
51:50.040 --> 51:53.240
|
|
staff's telling me having trouble getting you on the recording? Okay, thank you.
|
|
|
|
51:54.440 --> 51:58.520
|
|
In my professional evaluation of the literature, the Pfizer vaccine did a pretty good job of keeping
|
|
|
|
51:58.520 --> 52:03.640
|
|
people out of the cemetery, but it sucked at stopping the pandemic. And it was the best of
|
|
|
|
52:03.720 --> 52:10.520
|
|
lucky options that we had. And I still believe that it was deployed mostly in good faith,
|
|
|
|
52:11.080 --> 52:16.040
|
|
but there were a lot of shortcuts taken because the house was on fire and we could do a better
|
|
|
|
52:16.040 --> 52:19.400
|
|
job next time from the lessons that we're going to learn here. That's my own personal view of this,
|
|
|
|
52:20.120 --> 52:25.160
|
|
but I'm also my philosophical bent here is, I'm sure many of you've heard of Occam's razor,
|
|
|
|
52:25.160 --> 52:28.520
|
|
right? Choose the simplest of explanations. Well, there's another one called Hanlon's razor,
|
|
|
|
52:28.520 --> 52:32.280
|
|
which is never a tribute malice to that which can be better explained by incompetence. And so,
|
|
|
|
52:32.280 --> 52:36.120
|
|
I'm trying to be gracious here in many circumstances. There could be malice underneath,
|
|
|
|
52:36.120 --> 52:40.120
|
|
but I'm trying to see just incompetence to be gracious. So the Pfizer.
|
|
|
|
52:41.320 --> 52:50.120
|
|
So it's important to point out that for reasons beyond me, he thinks that after reviewing the
|
|
|
|
52:50.120 --> 52:57.240
|
|
literature and his professional opinion, the mRNA kept people alive, kept people out of the hospital,
|
|
|
|
52:57.240 --> 53:03.560
|
|
kept people out of the grave. And there's no evidence for that in Denny Rancor's data,
|
|
|
|
53:03.560 --> 53:10.520
|
|
none at all. Not only is there none at all, but he probably had access to it because this is like,
|
|
|
|
53:10.520 --> 53:18.360
|
|
you know, a month ago. So it's absurd to say that in his public, you know, he's a pharmacist.
|
|
|
|
53:18.360 --> 53:22.120
|
|
He says it himself. He's not an epidemiologist. It's, you know, I'm sure he's smart.
|
|
|
|
53:22.920 --> 53:28.840
|
|
But where's your data? If you're going to say this, kept people alive is a very big claim
|
|
|
|
53:31.160 --> 53:37.640
|
|
that it didn't really stop infection for very long. I mean, it was deployed in good faith
|
|
|
|
53:38.360 --> 53:45.480
|
|
after 45 minutes of design consideration. And all it was rushed. We could do it better next time.
|
|
|
|
53:45.560 --> 53:52.680
|
|
Is this any? Is there anything here that even comes close to going off script?
|
|
|
|
53:54.440 --> 54:01.240
|
|
Because I don't hear it. So far, there's a virus. It's spreading around the world like wildfire
|
|
|
|
54:01.240 --> 54:07.480
|
|
even now. And we had to do something and we rushed it, but the mRNA kept people out of the grave.
|
|
|
|
54:08.200 --> 54:17.720
|
|
A vaccine is contaminated with plasmid DNA. It's not just mRNA. It's got bits of DNA in it.
|
|
|
|
54:17.720 --> 54:23.320
|
|
This DNA is the DNA vector that was used as the template for the in vitro transcription reaction
|
|
|
|
54:23.320 --> 54:28.680
|
|
when they made the mRNA. I know this is true because I sequenced it in my own lab. The vials of
|
|
|
|
54:28.680 --> 54:32.440
|
|
Pfizer vaccine that were given out here in Columbia, one of my colleagues was in charge of that
|
|
|
|
54:32.440 --> 54:37.000
|
|
vaccination program in the College of Pharmacy. And for reasons that I still don't understand,
|
|
|
|
54:37.000 --> 54:41.080
|
|
he kept every single vial. So I got a whole freezer full of the empty vials. Well, the empty
|
|
|
|
54:41.080 --> 54:44.600
|
|
vials have a little tiny bit in the bottom of them. He gave them all to me and I looked at them.
|
|
|
|
54:44.600 --> 54:48.600
|
|
We had two batches that were given out here in Columbia. And I checked these two batches
|
|
|
|
54:48.600 --> 54:53.800
|
|
and I checked them by sequencing. And I sequenced all the DNA that was in the vaccine. And I can
|
|
|
|
54:53.800 --> 54:58.600
|
|
see what's in there. And it's surprising that there's any DNA in there. And you can kind of work out
|
|
|
|
54:58.600 --> 55:03.560
|
|
what it is and how it got there. And I'm kind of alarmed about the possible consequences of this,
|
|
|
|
55:03.560 --> 55:08.120
|
|
both in terms of human health and biology, but you should be alarmed about the regulatory
|
|
|
|
55:08.120 --> 55:14.600
|
|
process that allowed it to get there. So this DNA, in my view, it could be causing some of the
|
|
|
|
55:14.600 --> 55:18.920
|
|
rare but serious side effects like death from cardiac arrest. There's a lot of cases now of
|
|
|
|
55:18.920 --> 55:24.440
|
|
people having suspicious death after vaccine. It's hard to prove what caused it is just, you know,
|
|
|
|
55:24.440 --> 55:33.960
|
|
temporally associated. And this DNA is a plausible mechanism. Okay. This DNA can and likely will
|
|
|
|
55:33.960 --> 55:39.000
|
|
integrate into the genomic DNA of cells that got transfected with the vaccine mix. This is just
|
|
|
|
55:39.000 --> 55:42.680
|
|
the way it works. We do this in the lab all the time. We take pieces of DNA, we mix them up with a
|
|
|
|
55:42.680 --> 55:47.880
|
|
lipid complex like the Pfizer vaccine is in, we pour it onto cells and a lot of it gets into the
|
|
|
|
55:47.880 --> 55:53.240
|
|
cells and a lot of it gets into the DNA of those cells. And that's called transformation. And if
|
|
|
|
55:53.240 --> 56:00.040
|
|
you do it with with an RNA, it's called transfection. And you should say that.
|
|
|
|
56:00.920 --> 56:05.800
|
|
Teach everybody, make it plain and simple. We know all this works. This is how we do it.
|
|
|
|
56:06.600 --> 56:11.160
|
|
These are the terms. They should have told you that the adenovirus was a transformation
|
|
|
|
56:12.040 --> 56:18.200
|
|
and the lipid nanoparticle with the mRNA and it was a transfection. It becomes a permanent fixture
|
|
|
|
56:18.200 --> 56:24.040
|
|
of the cell. It's not just a temporary thing. It is in that cell and all of its progeny from now
|
|
|
|
56:24.040 --> 56:29.560
|
|
on forevermore on in. So that's why I'm kind of alarmed about this DNA being in the vaccine.
|
|
|
|
56:29.560 --> 56:34.520
|
|
It's different from RNA because it can be permanent. This is a real hazard for genome
|
|
|
|
56:34.520 --> 56:39.640
|
|
modification of long-lived somatic cells like stem cells. And it could cause theoretically.
|
|
|
|
56:39.640 --> 56:44.440
|
|
This is all a theoretical concern, but it's pretty reasonable based on solid molecular biology
|
|
|
|
56:44.520 --> 56:49.080
|
|
that it could cause a sustained autoimmunetact or that tissue. It's also a very real theoretical
|
|
|
|
56:49.080 --> 56:53.800
|
|
risk of future cancer in some people. Depending on where in the genome this foreign piece of DNA
|
|
|
|
56:53.800 --> 56:58.440
|
|
lands, it can interrupt a tumor suppressor or activate an oncogene. I think it'll be rare,
|
|
|
|
56:58.440 --> 57:01.720
|
|
but I think the risk is not zero and it may be high enough that we are to figure out if this
|
|
|
|
57:01.720 --> 57:07.320
|
|
is happening or not. And again, the autoimmunity thing is not my wheelhouse. I'm not an immunologist,
|
|
|
|
57:07.320 --> 57:11.560
|
|
but the cancer risk is. That's my bag. I know this is a thing and it is a possibility.
|
|
|
|
57:12.360 --> 57:18.600
|
|
Okay, a little nerdy science here at the center. Okay, so I'm just going to hit this off at the
|
|
|
|
57:18.600 --> 57:27.880
|
|
past while I'm going to turn the page soon. He said DNA contamination could cause the cardiac
|
|
|
|
57:27.880 --> 57:34.440
|
|
arrest, the deaths. It could be integrated into cells. It could cause the autoimmune response to
|
|
|
|
57:34.440 --> 57:40.920
|
|
those tissues. It could cause cancer in those tissues by interrupting tumor suppressors, etc.
|
|
|
|
57:41.880 --> 57:49.800
|
|
Now, what I want you to see here is that I don't think there's any reason to think that a
|
|
|
|
57:50.680 --> 57:58.680
|
|
codon optimized chemically altered pseudo uridine optimized, whatever you want to call it, RNA
|
|
|
|
57:59.320 --> 58:09.400
|
|
packaged in liposomes and injected in the muscle could be discounted as being the cause of this
|
|
|
|
58:09.480 --> 58:17.560
|
|
as well. But here we have a guy listing everything that we think the mRNA is doing and more
|
|
|
|
58:18.440 --> 58:24.120
|
|
and saying that the DNA could explain all of these things, which means what?
|
|
|
|
58:25.960 --> 58:29.320
|
|
Which means if we hadn't rushed it, the RNA could be great.
|
|
|
|
58:30.680 --> 58:33.800
|
|
Like what a great technology it would have been if we wouldn't have blown it.
|
|
|
|
58:34.760 --> 58:40.040
|
|
Be very careful, ladies and gentlemen, because it is very enticing to think that we have another
|
|
|
|
58:40.040 --> 58:48.280
|
|
ally here now. Great. He's on our team. The DNA is a contaminant. It's a story, ladies and gentlemen.
|
|
|
|
58:48.280 --> 58:55.160
|
|
The DNA is a contaminant. The DNA is a contaminant is one of the reasons why they knew this was
|
|
|
|
58:55.160 --> 59:01.160
|
|
not a therapy that was ready for mainstream, that was ready for healthy humans. Can you hear me?
|
|
|
|
59:02.120 --> 59:08.440
|
|
That's the reality. The fact of the matter is, is that these molecular biologists all around the
|
|
|
|
59:08.440 --> 59:15.240
|
|
world know that you can't separate completely the plasmid from the RNA that you generate from it.
|
|
|
|
59:15.880 --> 59:21.240
|
|
You can try really hard. You can digest the DNA, but it doesn't get it all out of there.
|
|
|
|
59:22.600 --> 59:26.520
|
|
And especially when you go from nanograms to kilograms of production.
|
|
|
|
59:26.840 --> 59:36.920
|
|
Just think breaking bad, small batch blue crystals, giant batch of blue crystals. It's different.
|
|
|
|
59:38.920 --> 59:41.400
|
|
It's part of what made that story a little bit me.
|
|
|
|
59:44.040 --> 59:51.080
|
|
But we are really talking about something very special here because it's not wrong. He is not
|
|
|
|
59:51.160 --> 59:58.600
|
|
wrong to be excited about there being DNA in there. But it's not unexpected. What's
|
|
|
|
59:59.560 --> 01:00:05.560
|
|
what's unexpected is that people are so silly as to think that this isn't part of the panoply
|
|
|
|
01:00:05.560 --> 01:00:12.200
|
|
of reasons why this would never work. But it's not the most important one. The most important one is,
|
|
|
|
01:00:13.080 --> 01:00:20.360
|
|
as I've said many times before, the most important one is that...
|
|
|
|
01:00:24.760 --> 01:00:33.480
|
|
Oops. Now what did I do? Where to go? What the hell? Boy, I'm really, I'm really failing you guys.
|
|
|
|
01:00:33.480 --> 01:00:39.480
|
|
I really apologize. That's really terrible. I was supposed to go here. And so you've really
|
|
|
|
01:00:39.560 --> 01:00:45.000
|
|
got to say this. You've got to say the transfection isn't immunization. That you can't augment the
|
|
|
|
01:00:45.000 --> 01:00:49.560
|
|
immune system from the inside. That's what I think we should be saying all the time.
|
|
|
|
01:00:51.320 --> 01:00:52.840
|
|
Okay. Let's listen more.
|
|
|
|
01:00:52.840 --> 01:00:58.520
|
|
Told dogma of molecular biology is that DNA gets transcribed into RNA. Okay. And then RNA
|
|
|
|
01:00:58.520 --> 01:01:04.040
|
|
gets translated into protein. This is just how life runs. Why does this matter? Well,
|
|
|
|
01:01:05.000 --> 01:01:09.480
|
|
for the purposes of this discussion, DNA is a long-lived information storage device.
|
|
|
|
01:01:10.120 --> 01:01:13.480
|
|
Okay. What you were born with, you're going to die with and have some of your kids. DNA lasts
|
|
|
|
01:01:13.480 --> 01:01:18.520
|
|
for hundreds of thousands of years, and it can last for generations if you pass it on to your kids.
|
|
|
|
01:01:18.520 --> 01:01:24.840
|
|
Right? So alterations to the DNA, they stick around. RNA, by its nature, is temporary. It
|
|
|
|
01:01:24.840 --> 01:01:30.360
|
|
doesn't last. And that feature of RNA was part of the sales pitch for the vaccine. The
|
|
|
|
01:01:30.440 --> 01:01:33.640
|
|
pseudo-urettine was supposed to make the RNA last a little bit longer. But still, it's a
|
|
|
|
01:01:33.640 --> 01:01:39.400
|
|
transient phenomenon. We're talking hours to days. Okay. And then proteins. Once proteins are made,
|
|
|
|
01:01:39.400 --> 01:01:43.960
|
|
they also don't last forever. They last for hours to days. But something that makes its way into
|
|
|
|
01:01:43.960 --> 01:01:49.160
|
|
DNA has the potential to lack. See, so he's already also saying that RNA is only around for hours
|
|
|
|
01:01:49.160 --> 01:01:55.720
|
|
to days. But we know that's not true with this, this altered RNA. We don't know how long it stays
|
|
|
|
01:01:55.720 --> 01:02:02.520
|
|
around. The crazy stories tell us it's around for as long as they've looked for it. And the other
|
|
|
|
01:02:02.520 --> 01:02:08.280
|
|
end of the crazy story is that it's only around for days. And so again, they're sculpting this
|
|
|
|
01:02:08.280 --> 01:02:14.120
|
|
narrative. But the narrative really is that the RNAs find the RNA is temporary. The RNA is not
|
|
|
|
01:02:14.120 --> 01:02:18.680
|
|
dangerous relative to DNA. The DNA is much worse. Now there's DNA and they're all bets are off,
|
|
|
|
01:02:18.680 --> 01:02:25.000
|
|
blah, blah, blah, blah. But we said this was going to happen like a year and a half ago,
|
|
|
|
01:02:25.000 --> 01:02:28.920
|
|
maybe even more than that, maybe even two years ago now, we said this was going to happen.
|
|
|
|
01:02:30.120 --> 01:02:40.280
|
|
That they were going to blame contamination, incompleteness, contaminated RNA, bad lipid
|
|
|
|
01:02:40.280 --> 01:02:45.800
|
|
nanoparticle, bad spike protein, they were going to blame something so that they could say but
|
|
|
|
01:02:45.800 --> 01:02:50.360
|
|
the transfection were great. Best for a very long time, maybe a lifetime.
|
|
|
|
01:02:51.240 --> 01:02:56.120
|
|
So this is a picture of the sequencing read that the sequencing run that I did in the lab
|
|
|
|
01:02:57.000 --> 01:03:00.040
|
|
from a couple of batches of the Pfizer vaccine. And all those little bitty lines here are the
|
|
|
|
01:03:00.040 --> 01:03:04.200
|
|
little tiny pieces of DNA that are in the vaccine. They don't belong there. They're just not part
|
|
|
|
01:03:04.200 --> 01:03:08.120
|
|
of the sales picture of the marketing campaign. And they're there. There's a lot of them. This
|
|
|
|
01:03:08.120 --> 01:03:11.480
|
|
little graph here in the middle is the size distribution that peaks around 100 base pairs,
|
|
|
|
01:03:11.480 --> 01:03:17.080
|
|
120 base pairs. So the DNA pieces that just dawned on me, do you think that they can convince
|
|
|
|
01:03:17.160 --> 01:03:22.680
|
|
everybody that took a shot to get sequenced to track this down? It says underneath here,
|
|
|
|
01:03:23.400 --> 01:03:27.880
|
|
we should sequence a few hundred people and find out if this DNA ever got into the human genome.
|
|
|
|
01:03:29.640 --> 01:03:34.600
|
|
Could they trick people into thinking that, yeah, you should definitely get your gene sequence.
|
|
|
|
01:03:34.600 --> 01:03:39.400
|
|
You should get your genome sequenced right away. We'll pay for it for free because we're trying
|
|
|
|
01:03:39.400 --> 01:03:44.360
|
|
to track down this possible integration. Boy, that would be a funny one, wouldn't it?
|
|
|
|
01:03:44.440 --> 01:03:49.640
|
|
They're in the vaccine are short little pieces, 100, 120. There's some that are about 500 base
|
|
|
|
01:03:49.640 --> 01:03:55.560
|
|
pairs, a few that are even 5,000. But most of them are around 100 base pairs. Why is this important?
|
|
|
|
01:03:56.600 --> 01:04:03.720
|
|
Because the probability of a DNA piece of DNA integrating into the human genome is unrelated to
|
|
|
|
01:04:03.720 --> 01:04:09.000
|
|
its size. So your genome risk is just a function of how many particles there are. So it's like,
|
|
|
|
01:04:09.000 --> 01:04:13.080
|
|
you know, if you shoot a shotgun at a washboard, if you shoot a slug, you have some probability
|
|
|
|
01:04:13.080 --> 01:04:16.360
|
|
of hitting it and they shoot buckshot. You have a bigger probability of hitting it with some shot,
|
|
|
|
01:04:16.360 --> 01:04:20.040
|
|
right? All these little pieces of DNA that are in the vaccine are analogous to buckshot.
|
|
|
|
01:04:21.240 --> 01:04:27.960
|
|
You have many, many thousands of opportunities to modify a cell of a vaccinated person.
|
|
|
|
01:04:29.240 --> 01:04:32.680
|
|
The pieces are very small because during the process, they chopped them up to try to make
|
|
|
|
01:04:32.680 --> 01:04:36.840
|
|
them go away. But they actually increased the hazard of genome modification in the process.
|
|
|
|
01:04:36.840 --> 01:04:45.880
|
|
That's how this got here. In my view, somebody should go about sequencing DNA samples from stem
|
|
|
|
01:04:45.880 --> 01:04:51.480
|
|
cells of people who are vaccinated and find out if this theoretical risk has happened or not.
|
|
|
|
01:04:52.360 --> 01:04:57.240
|
|
I think this is a real serious oversight, regulatory oversight that happened at the federal level,
|
|
|
|
01:04:57.240 --> 01:05:02.280
|
|
and somebody should force this to happen somewhere. Dr. McArthur, are you capable of doing that?
|
|
|
|
01:05:02.280 --> 01:05:06.760
|
|
Yeah, we do that kind of thing. But in order for it to be trustworthy by the public,
|
|
|
|
01:05:06.760 --> 01:05:10.600
|
|
this has to be done by lots of people. I'll talk to you more about that later.
|
|
|
|
01:05:10.600 --> 01:05:14.200
|
|
Yeah, this is our deal. This is why I know this should have been done at the federal level.
|
|
|
|
01:05:17.240 --> 01:05:22.280
|
|
So we took all these pieces of DNA and we used them to glue together what the source DNA must have
|
|
|
|
01:05:22.280 --> 01:05:26.600
|
|
been. This is kind of, again, this is what we do in the lab all the time. And all these little
|
|
|
|
01:05:26.600 --> 01:05:30.680
|
|
little red and green lines here, these are all in a bit, little pieces of DNA. This must have
|
|
|
|
01:05:30.760 --> 01:05:35.160
|
|
100,000 pieces of DNA in this sequencing run. And you can put them all back together and see
|
|
|
|
01:05:36.040 --> 01:05:40.520
|
|
what they came from is this circle over here. It's a plasmid that you can go shopping online
|
|
|
|
01:05:40.520 --> 01:05:46.440
|
|
to buy from Agilent. And it's clear that Pfizer took this plasmid and then they cloned spike into
|
|
|
|
01:05:46.440 --> 01:05:53.080
|
|
it. And they used it in a process called in vitro transcription translation, in vitro transcription,
|
|
|
|
01:05:53.080 --> 01:05:58.280
|
|
where you feed an RNA polymerase, this plasmid, and it makes a whole bunch of mRNA copies for you.
|
|
|
|
01:05:59.160 --> 01:06:02.760
|
|
And then you take this mRNA, you mix it with the lipid nanoparticle transfection reagent,
|
|
|
|
01:06:02.760 --> 01:06:06.600
|
|
and now you've got your mRNA vaccine, but they failed to get the DNA out before they did.
|
|
|
|
01:06:06.600 --> 01:06:11.800
|
|
So you understand that basically he's describing the exact same way that pieces of an infectious
|
|
|
|
01:06:11.800 --> 01:06:15.480
|
|
clone would be made before they're ligated together to produce the whole RNA.
|
|
|
|
01:06:17.480 --> 01:06:26.760
|
|
It's the same plasmid DNA, grown at quantity in a bacteria, and then produced or mixed together
|
|
|
|
01:06:26.760 --> 01:06:33.080
|
|
with a master mix transcription translation enzyme, and then you get your RNA. So listen to
|
|
|
|
01:06:33.080 --> 01:06:40.520
|
|
him say it again, because it's nice to hear him explain how you take a plasmid DNA, which could
|
|
|
|
01:06:40.520 --> 01:06:47.720
|
|
easily code for a coronavirus. In this case, it's coding for the coronavirus spike, and you make a
|
|
|
|
01:06:47.720 --> 01:06:54.840
|
|
lot of mRNA after you grow the plasmid in translation in vitro transcription, where you feed an RNA
|
|
|
|
01:06:54.920 --> 01:06:57.800
|
|
polymerase, this plasmid, and it makes a whole bunch of mRNA copies for you.
|
|
|
|
01:06:58.680 --> 01:07:02.280
|
|
And then you take this mRNA, you mix it with the lipid nanoparticle transfection reagent,
|
|
|
|
01:07:02.280 --> 01:07:06.040
|
|
and now you've got your mRNA vaccine, but they failed to get the DNA out before they did this.
|
|
|
|
01:07:06.040 --> 01:07:10.040
|
|
So these little pieces, they did make some effort to chop it up, so all these little pieces of
|
|
|
|
01:07:10.040 --> 01:07:14.520
|
|
the plasmid got packaged in with the RNA. That's clear as day what happened just from the forensics
|
|
|
|
01:07:14.520 --> 01:07:22.280
|
|
of looking at the DNA sequencing. A little bit of a regulatory note here. The way you do RNA
|
|
|
|
01:07:22.280 --> 01:07:27.720
|
|
transcription, in vitro transcription reactions, you have to give it a DNA template. And you can
|
|
|
|
01:07:27.720 --> 01:07:32.360
|
|
give it a DNA template that is just a synthetic piece of DNA that is only the instructions to make
|
|
|
|
01:07:32.360 --> 01:07:37.880
|
|
the RNA, and that's what was done for getting the emergency use authorization and the clinical
|
|
|
|
01:07:37.880 --> 01:07:42.360
|
|
trial. That's called process one, if you look up that kind of stuff. They made a PCR product of
|
|
|
|
01:07:42.360 --> 01:07:45.720
|
|
just the bits that they wanted, and then they did the in vitro transcription, made a bunch of
|
|
|
|
01:07:45.720 --> 01:07:51.480
|
|
RNA of that. There was no plasmid DNA to contaminate the stuff that was used for the trial. But that
|
|
|
|
01:07:51.560 --> 01:07:56.600
|
|
making that PCR product doesn't scale the way. So you see he's talking very clearly about
|
|
|
|
01:07:57.160 --> 01:08:01.560
|
|
what Vincent Rancin Yellow talked about at the beginning of the pandemic, how fascinating it was
|
|
|
|
01:08:02.600 --> 01:08:09.080
|
|
that they were scaling up from nanograms on a bench to kilograms in a vat. And this is what
|
|
|
|
01:08:09.080 --> 01:08:15.400
|
|
he's describing the original batches in the trials and the data that he just defended, by the way.
|
|
|
|
01:08:16.360 --> 01:08:23.320
|
|
The product that was injected into those people and was likely distributed on movie sets,
|
|
|
|
01:08:23.320 --> 01:08:28.760
|
|
it distributed anywhere where they didn't want to hurt people or wanted to be sure they were
|
|
|
|
01:08:28.760 --> 01:08:36.840
|
|
giving them the best product. It would have been done that way. They would have made the DNA sequence
|
|
|
|
01:08:37.640 --> 01:08:44.840
|
|
synthetically, so that there was none of this plasmid stuff. There was no possibility of
|
|
|
|
01:08:44.840 --> 01:08:50.520
|
|
contamination in that way, and then they would just do it all synthetically. You can do that
|
|
|
|
01:08:50.520 --> 01:08:56.920
|
|
for nanograms, you can do that for treating one cancer patient, but you can't do it for treating
|
|
|
|
01:08:56.920 --> 01:09:03.720
|
|
a bit, making a billion shots. Think about the scale there that they purport to have done,
|
|
|
|
01:09:04.280 --> 01:09:09.240
|
|
because they're just so badass. They went from being able to make small batch,
|
|
|
|
01:09:10.360 --> 01:09:17.640
|
|
you know, really microbrewery type stuff, like a single cappuccino for a really sick guy with a
|
|
|
|
01:09:17.640 --> 01:09:26.920
|
|
very unique genetic condition to making that cappuccino for everyone. It's just crazy.
|
|
|
|
01:09:26.920 --> 01:09:34.920
|
|
But like I said, and like other people I think I see pointed out, he did defend the trial data,
|
|
|
|
01:09:34.920 --> 01:09:43.480
|
|
he didn't question it at all. And so he's clearly not questioning where we are or where we went.
|
|
|
|
01:09:43.480 --> 01:09:47.720
|
|
I also saw it pointed out in the chat that he was actually not only was he testing, but he was
|
|
|
|
01:09:47.720 --> 01:09:55.000
|
|
testing a lot of people and helped make a few products for testing. Probably still own some
|
|
|
|
01:09:55.080 --> 01:10:00.280
|
|
patents on testing methodologies and those will go forward, maybe even in a patent pool
|
|
|
|
01:10:00.920 --> 01:10:06.600
|
|
distributed by the who. So keep in mind, ladies and gentlemen, what's happening here.
|
|
|
|
01:10:07.560 --> 01:10:14.760
|
|
It is very likely that there is a patent pool of countermeasures that include diagnostics,
|
|
|
|
01:10:15.720 --> 01:10:22.600
|
|
that include vaccines and the technologies used to make them, bottle them, create them.
|
|
|
|
01:10:25.240 --> 01:10:33.960
|
|
And countless other patents that are bundled together and are being distributed by world
|
|
|
|
01:10:33.960 --> 01:10:39.880
|
|
governments to set a new industry standard on all of these things that they will then leverage
|
|
|
|
01:10:40.840 --> 01:10:49.800
|
|
as medical industry standards to enforce testing, to enforce the continued existence of COVID,
|
|
|
|
01:10:50.760 --> 01:10:56.600
|
|
to enforce the continued funding and pushing of shots.
|
|
|
|
01:10:59.720 --> 01:11:05.800
|
|
This is not going away. This was the plan all along. This was a shift, a permanent shift that
|
|
|
|
01:11:05.800 --> 01:11:10.920
|
|
if we don't stop it, it will be permanent. And in a way, we don't need to stop it. We just need
|
|
|
|
01:11:10.920 --> 01:11:17.160
|
|
to step away from it because if we don't need to replace that system with something else,
|
|
|
|
01:11:17.160 --> 01:11:21.240
|
|
right, we just need to get out of it. All right, let's listen. Sorry.
|
|
|
|
01:11:21.800 --> 01:11:26.280
|
|
That was necessary to vaccinate the whole world. So a cheaper way to scale up the production of
|
|
|
|
01:11:26.280 --> 01:11:30.600
|
|
this template is to clone that PCR product into this plasma vector, put the plasma vector into
|
|
|
|
01:11:30.600 --> 01:11:33.880
|
|
bacteria and then you can grow up big vats of the bacteria. They make a lot of the plasma DNA
|
|
|
|
01:11:33.880 --> 01:11:38.600
|
|
for you and use that plasma DNA as the template to drive this transcription reaction to make your
|
|
|
|
01:11:38.600 --> 01:11:45.640
|
|
RNA. And that's where how the contamination ended up in the production batches, even though it was
|
|
|
|
01:11:45.720 --> 01:11:51.320
|
|
not in the stuff that was used for the authorization trials. So I know it's a little bit of nerdy
|
|
|
|
01:11:51.320 --> 01:11:56.600
|
|
science, but it has regulatory implications for you guys. So it's interesting because there's a
|
|
|
|
01:11:56.600 --> 01:12:02.120
|
|
new paper out that analyzes that data and shows what Steve Kirsch was kind of pushing a long time
|
|
|
|
01:12:02.120 --> 01:12:07.960
|
|
ago, which is that more people were killed in the control group after on masking or sorry,
|
|
|
|
01:12:07.960 --> 01:12:11.720
|
|
in the experimental group that got the shots versus the people who didn't get the shots.
|
|
|
|
01:12:12.200 --> 01:12:19.640
|
|
And there is a new paper out. It's a it's a pre-print that will probably cover this week in a journal club
|
|
|
|
01:12:19.640 --> 01:12:26.200
|
|
as we try to get into the swing of things again. And I think this will be really important to
|
|
|
|
01:12:26.200 --> 01:12:31.080
|
|
acknowledge that this person is not really talking about that at all. In fact, glossing over that
|
|
|
|
01:12:31.640 --> 01:12:38.760
|
|
well-known fact that they unblinded the trial. They gave everybody that wanted it in the control
|
|
|
|
01:12:38.840 --> 01:12:46.200
|
|
group, the transfection. And in that group of people, then a few more people died,
|
|
|
|
01:12:47.000 --> 01:12:52.840
|
|
which put it at a total of during the study period, 14 people died in the control group.
|
|
|
|
01:12:52.840 --> 01:12:57.000
|
|
They were unvaccinated and 20 died in the control group.
|
|
|
|
01:12:59.400 --> 01:13:06.440
|
|
So, you know, they say that's insignificant, but it's definitely not good. And he's glossing over
|
|
|
|
01:13:06.440 --> 01:13:08.200
|
|
that right now and not saying it at all.
|
|
|
|
01:13:12.680 --> 01:13:17.160
|
|
We can we can measure the quantity of this stuff pretty easy in the lab. This is we're good at
|
|
|
|
01:13:17.160 --> 01:13:21.240
|
|
doing this kind of stuff. This is the same we made a little PC, a colleague of mine at MIT made,
|
|
|
|
01:13:21.240 --> 01:13:27.240
|
|
you know, from who used to work for the Broad Institute at MIT, he made a little PCR test.
|
|
|
|
01:13:27.240 --> 01:13:31.640
|
|
And we cloned it here. This is similar to the PCR test that you all took for the spit test.
|
|
|
|
01:13:31.640 --> 01:13:36.360
|
|
Okay, same same idea and same expertise behind it. And we can quantify exactly how much of the
|
|
|
|
01:13:36.360 --> 01:13:41.640
|
|
stuff is in a vaccine or any other tissue. And, you know, I estimate that there were
|
|
|
|
01:13:42.280 --> 01:13:46.840
|
|
about 2 billion copies of the one piece that we're looking for in every dose.
|
|
|
|
01:13:47.720 --> 01:13:51.640
|
|
And if you look back at that map, I showed you where it's all these little the little piece
|
|
|
|
01:13:51.640 --> 01:13:56.600
|
|
that we're looking for is just that little bit right there. Okay. But if you see 2 billion copies
|
|
|
|
01:13:56.600 --> 01:14:02.680
|
|
of this, there's about 200 billion of everything else. So what this means is that there's probably
|
|
|
|
01:14:02.760 --> 01:14:10.840
|
|
about 200 billion pieces of this plasma DNA in each dose of the vaccine. And it's encapsulated
|
|
|
|
01:14:10.840 --> 01:14:16.360
|
|
in this lipid nanoparticle. So it's ready to be delivered inside the cell. Okay, this is a bad idea.
|
|
|
|
01:14:18.600 --> 01:14:22.360
|
|
My conclusions from this, we should check a bunch of people.
|
|
|
|
01:14:25.400 --> 01:14:27.960
|
|
My conclusions from this are actually learn how to run PowerPoint.
|
|
|
|
01:14:28.920 --> 01:14:35.320
|
|
We should check a bunch of vaccinated people getting tissue samples, especially if we focus
|
|
|
|
01:14:35.320 --> 01:14:40.600
|
|
on harmed people, but that's not necessary. We could also just focus on regular unharmed people
|
|
|
|
01:14:40.600 --> 01:14:45.480
|
|
and see if this plasma DNA is integrating into the genomes of any of their stem cells. It leaves
|
|
|
|
01:14:45.480 --> 01:14:49.880
|
|
a calling card that is there. One of the reasons why I'm focusing on this is because
|
|
|
|
01:14:50.760 --> 01:14:54.200
|
|
it's kind of different from a lot of the other imagined harms where you can't really prove it.
|
|
|
|
01:14:54.200 --> 01:14:57.000
|
|
You can be suspicious because of the timing, but you can't really prove it. This one,
|
|
|
|
01:14:57.000 --> 01:15:03.160
|
|
you can prove it because it leaves a calling card. Okay, now that's really nice, but keep in mind
|
|
|
|
01:15:03.160 --> 01:15:10.280
|
|
the one general mechanism that we've talked about time and time again, make sure you understand
|
|
|
|
01:15:10.280 --> 01:15:21.160
|
|
that he's not able to blame this mechanism on the shot, sorry, the DNA. And that mechanism is
|
|
|
|
01:15:21.160 --> 01:15:28.840
|
|
the mechanism that that Sukhrat Bhakti really codified best. It is the mechanism if I draw
|
|
|
|
01:15:28.840 --> 01:15:36.120
|
|
the inside of a capillary here, okay, with endothelial cells beating these rectangles,
|
|
|
|
01:15:36.120 --> 01:15:43.800
|
|
which of course is terrible. And so you have blood flow this way. Then when these cells get
|
|
|
|
01:15:43.800 --> 01:15:48.520
|
|
transfected and they're very likely to get transfected, because again, these are cells that are
|
|
|
|
01:15:49.400 --> 01:15:55.080
|
|
are experiencing a lot of local fluid pressure here. And so this is supposed to be where the
|
|
|
|
01:15:55.080 --> 01:16:00.280
|
|
lipid nanoparticle will come into contact with membrane the most. And of course, the surface
|
|
|
|
01:16:00.280 --> 01:16:08.680
|
|
area of your capillaries in your body is ginormous. When these cells are expressing spike protein,
|
|
|
|
01:16:09.800 --> 01:16:17.640
|
|
the first shot, they will be attacked by the immune system and removed. And you hope that the spike
|
|
|
|
01:16:17.720 --> 01:16:23.240
|
|
protein is presented to the immune system and you develop antibodies to it. And this would be
|
|
|
|
01:16:23.240 --> 01:16:32.760
|
|
the first shot. The second shot and beyond will give you spike protein down here. And you will
|
|
|
|
01:16:32.760 --> 01:16:40.040
|
|
have antibodies that stick to it. And those antibodies can bring in a cytotoxic T cell response. They
|
|
|
|
01:16:40.040 --> 01:16:45.640
|
|
could bring in a a natural killer cell response, a neutrophil response. They could bring in the
|
|
|
|
01:16:45.640 --> 01:16:51.960
|
|
complement system. And they can also cause complement to cling to the outside of the cell
|
|
|
|
01:16:51.960 --> 01:17:00.840
|
|
if there's enough spike protein. And that can cause clotting, micro clotting or just playing
|
|
|
|
01:17:00.840 --> 01:17:08.040
|
|
clotting. And so this general mechanism will occur irrespective of whether the special spike
|
|
|
|
01:17:08.040 --> 01:17:13.560
|
|
protein is there or whether it's a frog protein or or another membrane bond protein that's not
|
|
|
|
01:17:13.560 --> 01:17:19.640
|
|
supposed to be there. There's a good chance that transfection into the muscle that leaks out into
|
|
|
|
01:17:19.640 --> 01:17:27.560
|
|
your into circulation will will transfect endothelial cells and you'll get this possibility for every
|
|
|
|
01:17:27.560 --> 01:17:33.800
|
|
subsequent exposure to the transfection because it will express that protein again in the presence
|
|
|
|
01:17:33.800 --> 01:17:40.840
|
|
of those antibodies. That's a very different effect than what we've been talking about with regard
|
|
|
|
01:17:41.800 --> 01:17:46.120
|
|
with regard to this, what what he's been saying with the DNA. And why is that important just to
|
|
|
|
01:17:46.120 --> 01:17:54.280
|
|
acknowledge that it's this time when these cells are destroyed that neutrophils will come along,
|
|
|
|
01:17:55.240 --> 01:18:04.520
|
|
should be neutra, neutra. Is it pH? I think it's pH, right? Neutrophils,
|
|
|
|
01:18:05.400 --> 01:18:12.200
|
|
something's not compiled there, right? Neutrophils will come along and they destroy things with
|
|
|
|
01:18:12.200 --> 01:18:21.320
|
|
enzymes. Those enzymes will release. These cells are flexible. These cells contain fibers in them
|
|
|
|
01:18:21.320 --> 01:18:27.240
|
|
that make them flexible. And when the neutrophils come along to dissolve these guys, they have a
|
|
|
|
01:18:27.240 --> 01:18:35.240
|
|
very special neutrophil elastase, which is a neutrophil enzyme. Elastase is the enzyme
|
|
|
|
01:18:36.040 --> 01:18:41.160
|
|
that can destroy some of those fibers. And then those fibers are now floating around
|
|
|
|
01:18:41.960 --> 01:18:48.680
|
|
and part of this cleanup. And so again, you hope that your cells won't present those
|
|
|
|
01:18:48.680 --> 01:18:53.560
|
|
self-antigens to T cells and find a T cell that will recognize them. You hope that they're only
|
|
|
|
01:18:53.560 --> 01:19:01.080
|
|
going to present the S protein. But when those fibers are released and they're building up,
|
|
|
|
01:19:01.080 --> 01:19:08.520
|
|
they don't necessarily get cleared. And that seems to be these fibrous clots that are found in some
|
|
|
|
01:19:08.520 --> 01:19:14.200
|
|
of these people that are dead. So it could be that a lot of endothelial cells are being destroyed
|
|
|
|
01:19:14.680 --> 01:19:23.160
|
|
each shot or on the deadly shot. And that that fibrin that's released when the neutrophil
|
|
|
|
01:19:23.160 --> 01:19:30.120
|
|
elastase is dissolving endothelial cells is part of that clotting mechanism as well.
|
|
|
|
01:19:30.120 --> 01:19:36.200
|
|
And so again, this has nothing to do with DNA integration or anything like that because this
|
|
|
|
01:19:36.200 --> 01:19:45.480
|
|
is just expression of a foreign protein driven by transfection. And so I need, I'm hoping that
|
|
|
|
01:19:45.480 --> 01:19:54.200
|
|
you can keep in mind how general this is up here, how general this is versus how the DNA is a very
|
|
|
|
01:19:54.200 --> 01:19:59.400
|
|
it's an interesting thing. I'm no doubt about it and could be devastating and ugly and yucky. But
|
|
|
|
01:20:00.680 --> 01:20:05.400
|
|
if the DNA integrates into your endothelial cells, your endothelial cells are not going to be passed
|
|
|
|
01:20:05.400 --> 01:20:11.480
|
|
onto your children. So the real danger would be if it integrated into your gametes, into your
|
|
|
|
01:20:11.480 --> 01:20:18.360
|
|
eggs or into your sperm. And that's very testable, obviously, especially with sperm,
|
|
|
|
01:20:19.240 --> 01:20:25.880
|
|
to a certain extent, at least it should be. And it you have all the eggs that you're ever going to
|
|
|
|
01:20:25.880 --> 01:20:32.680
|
|
have as a woman. So as a girl, so that's extremely terrifying from the perspective of young women
|
|
|
|
01:20:33.560 --> 01:20:39.480
|
|
being exposed to DNA contamination. So there you have very much dangerous crazy things.
|
|
|
|
01:20:40.120 --> 01:20:46.280
|
|
But it's important to understand that this mechanism above, which was really best and first described
|
|
|
|
01:20:46.280 --> 01:20:52.040
|
|
by Sukhir Bhakti is a mechanism that is completely independent of the spike protein being extra
|
|
|
|
01:20:52.040 --> 01:20:58.200
|
|
toxic, extra dangerous, having any clotting factors coded into it or whatever other magic you want to
|
|
|
|
01:20:58.200 --> 01:21:05.000
|
|
say, because it doesn't matter what protein you express via transfection. If it's transmembrane
|
|
|
|
01:21:06.120 --> 01:21:12.600
|
|
and it sticks out and you do it repeatedly, that endothelial cells are going to be the target of
|
|
|
|
01:21:12.600 --> 01:21:19.400
|
|
this, this clearance, this autoimmunity is potentially there. And also the clotting is always there. The
|
|
|
|
01:21:19.400 --> 01:21:24.520
|
|
more shots you take, the more possible it is, I think. And we may see that as we move forward
|
|
|
|
01:21:25.160 --> 01:21:29.000
|
|
as we get people with four or five shots. Who knows?
|
|
|
|
01:21:34.040 --> 01:21:39.400
|
|
You find it in the stem cells of harmed people. It's equivalent to finding a certain type of lid
|
|
|
|
01:21:39.400 --> 01:21:43.480
|
|
in someone who is now dead. It's pretty reasonable to assume that that's what caused it.
|
|
|
|
01:21:44.840 --> 01:21:51.320
|
|
The royal we, meaning you guys should insist that the FDA force Pfizer to get the DNA out of the
|
|
|
|
01:21:51.320 --> 01:21:57.240
|
|
booster and all future versions of this vaccine. I'm a real fan of this platform. Okay. I think
|
|
|
|
01:21:57.240 --> 01:22:03.640
|
|
it has the potential to treat cancers. I really believe that this platform is revolutionary and
|
|
|
|
01:22:03.640 --> 01:22:10.120
|
|
in your lifetime, there will be mRNA vaccines against antigens in your unique cancer. Okay.
|
|
|
|
01:22:10.120 --> 01:22:14.680
|
|
And but they got to get this problem fixed. Okay. And I right now, I think the financial incentives
|
|
|
|
01:22:14.680 --> 01:22:19.400
|
|
are too great to just keep on rolling with it. And it's going to take some encouragement to get it
|
|
|
|
01:22:19.480 --> 01:22:25.640
|
|
out. The regulation that allowed this DNA to be there in the first place. I don't think that this
|
|
|
|
01:22:25.640 --> 01:22:32.040
|
|
amounts there actually exceed the regulation limits. In some batches, it may. In the two batches that
|
|
|
|
01:22:32.040 --> 01:22:35.160
|
|
I looked at, one of them, it was just under the limit and one, it was just over the limit. My
|
|
|
|
01:22:35.160 --> 01:22:38.920
|
|
colleague in Boston has looked at a fair number of other batches. And there's a handful that are
|
|
|
|
01:22:38.920 --> 01:22:43.400
|
|
super high and there's a handful that are super low. But the fact that there is a regulatory threshold
|
|
|
|
01:22:43.960 --> 01:22:49.400
|
|
for amount of DNA allowed in the vaccine is a throwback to an era when we were talking about
|
|
|
|
01:22:49.400 --> 01:22:53.720
|
|
vaccines that were like a recombinant protein that you are a dead virus, you know, attenuated virus
|
|
|
|
01:22:53.720 --> 01:22:59.560
|
|
produced in CFO cells or something like that. And the DNA that might be in it is naked DNA.
|
|
|
|
01:22:59.560 --> 01:23:03.800
|
|
And you might have a little bit in the vaccine. That's not a problem because naked DNA gets
|
|
|
|
01:23:03.800 --> 01:23:07.880
|
|
chewed up immediately upon vaccination. And there's no real mechanism for it to get inside the cells.
|
|
|
|
01:23:07.880 --> 01:23:12.680
|
|
And they inappropriately applied that regulatory limit to this new kind of vaccine where everything
|
|
|
|
01:23:12.680 --> 01:23:17.080
|
|
is encapsulated in a slip and nanoparticle is basically packaged in a synthetic virus able
|
|
|
|
01:23:17.080 --> 01:23:22.040
|
|
to dump its contents into a cell. So I'm thinking Hanlon's razor here. Okay, I don't think there
|
|
|
|
01:23:22.040 --> 01:23:27.320
|
|
was anything nefarious here. I think it was just kind of a dumb oversight. And it's going to take,
|
|
|
|
01:23:27.320 --> 01:23:31.480
|
|
because the financial incentives are so great to just, you know, sweep it under the rug and the
|
|
|
|
01:23:31.480 --> 01:23:34.440
|
|
career incentives of people that approve this are going to be, there's nothing wrong here,
|
|
|
|
01:23:34.440 --> 01:23:40.120
|
|
you know, it's going to take some encouragement to make people prove that it's okay. But I really
|
|
|
|
01:23:40.200 --> 01:23:44.680
|
|
believe this was an inappropriate application of an old school regulation to a new kind of
|
|
|
|
01:23:44.680 --> 01:23:48.440
|
|
vaccine. And who knows, maybe we'll check a bunch of people and we'll find out for sure that this
|
|
|
|
01:23:48.440 --> 01:23:52.840
|
|
is indeed not a problem. And that will do the public good if we prove that. Mr. Chairman.
|
|
|
|
01:23:55.000 --> 01:23:59.560
|
|
So that's pretty spectacular. I mean, he's giving them the opportunity to prove that it's
|
|
|
|
01:23:59.560 --> 01:24:05.320
|
|
not bad. So we could do some papers and publish some stuff and this, this whole rumor could go away.
|
|
|
|
01:24:06.280 --> 01:24:11.160
|
|
But he believes in this technology and he doesn't want this technology to be ruined or lost.
|
|
|
|
01:24:12.840 --> 01:24:20.280
|
|
And so tell me you hear it. Tell me you see exactly what I see. A guy who has been interested
|
|
|
|
01:24:20.280 --> 01:24:25.880
|
|
in the virus since the very beginning. He gave us a number of testing platforms so that we,
|
|
|
|
01:24:26.840 --> 01:24:30.600
|
|
we definitely had a mystery to solve. And we definitely had bad guys to catch
|
|
|
|
01:24:31.560 --> 01:24:33.000
|
|
because his tests prove it.
|
|
|
|
01:24:39.160 --> 01:24:39.480
|
|
Wow.
|
|
|
|
01:24:41.960 --> 01:24:46.920
|
|
I mean, he said it in spades. It's just, it's crazy. It's just absolutely crazy. I don't know
|
|
|
|
01:24:46.920 --> 01:24:51.000
|
|
how else to say it. I mean, they're doing exactly what we expected them to do.
|
|
|
|
01:24:52.600 --> 01:24:58.840
|
|
And it's not even a little bit off right now. And so now the only question is how can we get ahead
|
|
|
|
01:24:59.800 --> 01:25:05.320
|
|
and stop the dominoes from falling is right now we're right at where it's like we're in a drone
|
|
|
|
01:25:06.040 --> 01:25:11.960
|
|
and we're watching the dominoes fall and we're following it right as the dominoes hit the next
|
|
|
|
01:25:11.960 --> 01:25:19.880
|
|
domino. But we're not quite able to stop that one. So the question is how we can leap frog ahead
|
|
|
|
01:25:19.880 --> 01:25:24.680
|
|
a few dominoes and then knock one out of the way or something so that this whole thing just ends.
|
|
|
|
01:25:25.480 --> 01:25:28.840
|
|
I think that's really kind of a way we need to think about it.
|
|
|
|
01:25:30.120 --> 01:25:32.120
|
|
Does that mean we need to teach our children?
|
|
|
|
01:25:35.400 --> 01:25:38.760
|
|
Does that mean we need to save the children? I think that's what it means.
|
|
|
|
01:25:40.280 --> 01:25:44.520
|
|
We've got to think farther ahead the next year. That's for sure. We don't need to save the next
|
|
|
|
01:25:44.520 --> 01:25:54.200
|
|
election. We need to save the next generation. We need to save our kids. We need within the next
|
|
|
|
01:25:54.200 --> 01:26:03.640
|
|
five years we need a group of kids to go into college not believing this or better yet not going
|
|
|
|
01:26:03.640 --> 01:26:14.680
|
|
to college. How's that for a big statement? We need to raise a kid's kids not to need to go to college.
|
|
|
|
01:26:15.800 --> 01:26:20.200
|
|
We need to figure out a way for them to do it without it or do it at another means.
|
|
|
|
01:26:21.080 --> 01:26:25.880
|
|
Maybe they can all take classes at the Jordan Peterson online university and combine that with
|
|
|
|
01:26:25.880 --> 01:26:33.880
|
|
Prager and whatever Brett Weinstein's going to do. I don't know what the answers are ladies and
|
|
|
|
01:26:33.880 --> 01:26:38.200
|
|
gentlemen but I know that we are being bamboozled. We are being fooled and every time somebody new
|
|
|
|
01:26:38.200 --> 01:26:42.680
|
|
steps up to the mic it seems like they just stay on script. Okay.
|
|
|
|
01:26:43.400 --> 01:26:45.400
|
|
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
01:26:46.920 --> 01:26:53.000
|
|
Dr. We appreciate all that you're saying although we don't understand most of what you're saying.
|
|
|
|
01:26:53.000 --> 01:26:57.000
|
|
Sorry. I have a limited amount of time somewhere down there agreeing a lot so you must have been
|
|
|
|
01:26:57.000 --> 01:27:04.920
|
|
a chemistry major or something but what is going to help us is to know what you can do like
|
|
|
|
01:27:04.920 --> 01:27:09.320
|
|
checking a bunch of vaccinated people. Of course that's what I can do right but we
|
|
|
|
01:27:10.280 --> 01:27:16.600
|
|
are not going to have any authority over the FDA to force Pfizer to do something.
|
|
|
|
01:27:16.600 --> 01:27:21.560
|
|
I mean that's a federal issue unless you can explain to me how we could do something at a
|
|
|
|
01:27:21.560 --> 01:27:25.800
|
|
state level you know some of this is going to have to be taken up by our congressmen right.
|
|
|
|
01:27:26.680 --> 01:27:32.520
|
|
So just whatever your remaining comments are just keep in mind that I understand what we can do
|
|
|
|
01:27:32.520 --> 01:27:36.280
|
|
and really these technical things you're throwing out as a senator from Greenville's
|
|
|
|
01:27:36.360 --> 01:27:40.680
|
|
already mentioned we're going to throw right back at you because there's no you're the expert
|
|
|
|
01:27:40.680 --> 01:27:44.520
|
|
so if someone's going to do this testing I don't know who would find to do it
|
|
|
|
01:27:44.520 --> 01:27:48.680
|
|
well other than someone like you. I can do it lots of other people can do it. I've had a lot
|
|
|
|
01:27:48.680 --> 01:27:54.840
|
|
of corners and pharmacists from different states contact me I posted all this on Twitter right
|
|
|
|
01:27:54.840 --> 01:27:58.760
|
|
and so people will private message me and say I'd like to send you some samples and then they say
|
|
|
|
01:27:58.760 --> 01:28:03.560
|
|
oops state regulations will not allow our coroner to send any samples for this so there are some
|
|
|
|
01:28:03.560 --> 01:28:10.360
|
|
policy issues that can the trouble is is if you look for the integration of this DNA and you
|
|
|
|
01:28:10.360 --> 01:28:16.040
|
|
don't find it what does it mean doesn't mean you didn't look in the right place that you sampled
|
|
|
|
01:28:16.040 --> 01:28:26.760
|
|
the wrong part of the thigh like what I don't even know what I think this is is again one of these
|
|
|
|
01:28:26.760 --> 01:28:31.960
|
|
kind of scooby-doo unmaskings where here's the bad guy over here we better solve that puzzle now
|
|
|
|
01:28:32.840 --> 01:28:37.560
|
|
and it won't get us any farther down the road because we're not questioning the spread of the
|
|
|
|
01:28:37.560 --> 01:28:43.960
|
|
virus we're not questioning the protocols we're not questioning the biology of transfection at all
|
|
|
|
01:28:45.720 --> 01:28:50.520
|
|
we're really not questioning anything if we follow this narrative we follow this story we
|
|
|
|
01:28:50.520 --> 01:28:56.840
|
|
chase this shiny object that none other than Kevin McCurnan put in front of us
|
|
|
|
01:28:57.160 --> 01:29:03.560
|
|
and he only put it in front of us after I started talking about clones and the scooby-doo
|
|
|
|
01:29:05.320 --> 01:29:10.200
|
|
and before that everything was great and he was on my stream twice and he was telling me all about
|
|
|
|
01:29:10.200 --> 01:29:18.120
|
|
how the PCR had had primers that made little dimers and that the RNA was in pure because of
|
|
|
|
01:29:18.120 --> 01:29:26.680
|
|
the smear on the gel there is a big game of foot ladies and gentlemen and we are
|
|
|
|
01:29:26.760 --> 01:29:34.920
|
|
very very close to tying the game are you with me are you with me we're very very close to
|
|
|
|
01:29:34.920 --> 01:29:42.040
|
|
tying this game we've got to keep the pressure up we've got to keep working we've got to keep
|
|
|
|
01:29:42.040 --> 01:29:49.000
|
|
showing up every day for our family and friends we've got to keep showing up every day for our
|
|
|
|
01:29:49.080 --> 01:29:57.720
|
|
family and friends and we've got to keep from letting them recite the faith letting them be
|
|
|
|
01:29:57.720 --> 01:30:05.400
|
|
bamboozled into the faith because it's very easy to be bamboozled and trapped into thinking
|
|
|
|
01:30:05.400 --> 01:30:12.120
|
|
that one of these tv scenarios is still really not that ridiculous because it fits I mean I was
|
|
|
|
01:30:12.120 --> 01:30:15.960
|
|
sick you were sick my neighbor was sick so obviously there was something
|
|
|
|
01:30:17.720 --> 01:30:24.600
|
|
it's a very enticing trap but the conflated background signal is the best explanation the
|
|
|
|
01:30:24.600 --> 01:30:32.520
|
|
widest net doesn't have to have specifics I'm just very sure that they have absolutely zero data
|
|
|
|
01:30:32.520 --> 01:30:40.680
|
|
before 2020 about the prevalence of any of these RNA signals they have no idea what these PCR tests
|
|
|
|
01:30:40.760 --> 01:30:46.200
|
|
would have found in 2019 and how many people would have tested positive without being a
|
|
|
|
01:30:46.200 --> 01:30:56.360
|
|
symptomatic at all meaning we don't know whether this is noise or not most likely it is most likely
|
|
|
|
01:30:56.360 --> 01:31:01.320
|
|
it's a signal of noise that they characterized very well before the pandemic so they knew exactly
|
|
|
|
01:31:01.320 --> 01:31:08.200
|
|
what was there and how to use it do you understand what I'm saying most likely they characterized
|
|
|
|
01:31:08.200 --> 01:31:12.920
|
|
the noise that was there already a long time ago so that during the pandemic they would know how
|
|
|
|
01:31:12.920 --> 01:31:19.080
|
|
to use it that's what Nathan Wolf was doing that's what the eco-health alliance was doing
|
|
|
|
01:31:22.520 --> 01:31:27.160
|
|
characterizing this background so that maybe an endemic coronavirus could be blamed I don't know
|
|
|
|
01:31:27.160 --> 01:31:35.240
|
|
if that's what the background really is biologically maybe we haven't been able to track coronaviruses
|
|
|
|
01:31:35.240 --> 01:31:39.800
|
|
before this we can find them if you call it what we do finding them
|
|
|
|
01:31:41.560 --> 01:31:46.120
|
|
but we can't track and trace them like we claim to suddenly be able to do with this one just because
|
|
|
|
01:31:46.120 --> 01:31:53.880
|
|
it's so novel protocols were murder and transfection is in medicine it could have been an infectious
|
|
|
|
01:31:53.880 --> 01:32:00.520
|
|
clone I think an infectious clone is a very good plausible explanation of how a genuine sequence
|
|
|
|
01:32:00.520 --> 01:32:08.200
|
|
could have genuinely be found using PCR to amplify them even if it's 99 primer pairs you could get a
|
|
|
|
01:32:08.200 --> 01:32:15.240
|
|
really robust signal across lots of primer pairs if you had seeded the pandemic with an infectious
|
|
|
|
01:32:15.240 --> 01:32:24.440
|
|
clone and maybe an infectious clone would actually make people have a kind of recognizable suite of
|
|
|
|
01:32:24.440 --> 01:32:30.760
|
|
symptoms maybe not I don't know but I definitely know if you needed the seeding of a molecular
|
|
|
|
01:32:30.760 --> 01:32:36.040
|
|
signal that molecular biologists around the world would say holy shit there's a pandemic
|
|
|
|
01:32:36.040 --> 01:32:44.280
|
|
that's how you do it infectious clone a transfection agent releases another way of saying that because
|
|
|
|
01:32:44.280 --> 01:32:51.480
|
|
when you spray RNA into people's lungs or put it in their drinking water or or spray it in the air
|
|
|
|
01:32:51.880 --> 01:33:00.440
|
|
then you're transfecting them so conflated background signals where we are protocols were
|
|
|
|
01:33:00.440 --> 01:33:06.760
|
|
murder and transfection is not medicine and that holds true to you if you don't believe in viruses
|
|
|
|
01:33:06.760 --> 01:33:12.120
|
|
but of course that's a really ridiculous statement because viruses are a very tiny fraction of the
|
|
|
|
01:33:12.120 --> 01:33:19.320
|
|
total signal at that size scale because all of our tissues communicate with signals at that time
|
|
|
|
01:33:19.400 --> 01:33:26.120
|
|
scale that include DNA and RNA and proteins and all the mammals and all the plants and all the
|
|
|
|
01:33:26.120 --> 01:33:33.800
|
|
fungi and all the bacteria that we know also communicate with particles, vesicles and other
|
|
|
|
01:33:35.480 --> 01:33:40.680
|
|
things at that time scale or size scale that are very hard to separate from one another
|
|
|
|
01:33:42.360 --> 01:33:46.920
|
|
and virology would like you to believe that when they spin stuff down and it's that size in the
|
|
|
|
01:33:47.000 --> 01:33:51.000
|
|
sucrose gradient the only thing that's there are us only viruses here
|
|
|
|
01:33:53.080 --> 01:34:00.360
|
|
when in reality they know that that fraction it goes down the farthest in that sucrose gradient
|
|
|
|
01:34:00.920 --> 01:34:09.320
|
|
is full of exosomes full of vesicles full of protein blobs full of things of the same size
|
|
|
|
01:34:09.320 --> 01:34:16.600
|
|
scale not of all of which are these crazy viruses that's what Nathan Wolf was selling as his big
|
|
|
|
01:34:16.600 --> 01:34:24.600
|
|
thing that he could explore this crazy unknown place and find unknown life forms
|
|
|
|
01:34:27.800 --> 01:34:31.880
|
|
there's a conflated background signal ladies and gentlemen leak release lies it doesn't even
|
|
|
|
01:34:31.880 --> 01:34:35.960
|
|
matter because the protocols were murder and transfection is not medicine these people have
|
|
|
|
01:34:35.960 --> 01:34:41.400
|
|
fooled us into believing that it is medicine they've fooled us into believing that there is a novel
|
|
|
|
01:34:41.400 --> 01:34:48.600
|
|
virus they fooled us into believing that gain of function is real in order to invert our
|
|
|
|
01:34:48.600 --> 01:34:53.320
|
|
sovereignty and take it away from our children come on ladies and gentlemen they caused this stuff
|
|
|
|
01:34:54.920 --> 01:34:56.440
|
|
by inverting the way we think
|
|
|
|
01:34:59.800 --> 01:35:04.040
|
|
this graph was never shown to us just this one down here in the bottom and they just
|
|
|
|
01:35:04.040 --> 01:35:09.480
|
|
used the red one that's it went from zero and went up to something and they were just tacking on
|
|
|
|
01:35:09.480 --> 01:35:16.920
|
|
stuff that they killed people with bad protocols and bad tests if they needed a signal if you need
|
|
|
|
01:35:16.920 --> 01:35:24.760
|
|
a signal it's a clone that's all you need is a clone
|
|
|
|
01:35:27.160 --> 01:35:31.720
|
|
i don't know if it's all about the genetic data but it's it's a lot about that and it's about
|
|
|
|
01:35:31.720 --> 01:35:36.600
|
|
convincing your kids right it's not about you they don't need you your old all your data that's
|
|
|
|
01:35:36.600 --> 01:35:41.720
|
|
useful is gone they don't want to they can't tell all you got here without the data from before
|
|
|
|
01:35:42.600 --> 01:35:47.320
|
|
but they've got to convince your kids that when they have kids they should be giving up their data
|
|
|
|
01:35:48.040 --> 01:35:52.280
|
|
that's what this is about i know it's crazy but that's how they work that's their time frame their
|
|
|
|
01:35:52.280 --> 01:35:59.000
|
|
time scale their time horizon they've got this plan for a lot farther than you think so if you
|
|
|
|
01:35:59.000 --> 01:36:06.120
|
|
want to turn this cruise ship around it's going to be a long process we got to get untied we got to
|
|
|
|
01:36:06.120 --> 01:36:12.280
|
|
get back to the bridge we got to disable the autopilot we got to slow the ship down
|
|
|
|
01:36:14.280 --> 01:36:21.880
|
|
and then we can start turning the rudder ladies and gentlemen please join me at giga-ohm biological
|
|
|
|
01:36:21.880 --> 01:36:29.960
|
|
and that's dot com and then giga-ohm dot bio for communications for support thank you very much
|
|
|
|
01:36:30.040 --> 01:36:36.200
|
|
transfection is not immunization it's the first of october 2023 i never dreamed i would still be
|
|
|
|
01:36:36.200 --> 01:36:42.040
|
|
using this slide stop all transfections and humans because they are trying to eliminate the control
|
|
|
|
01:36:42.040 --> 01:36:48.680
|
|
group by any means necessary i never thought i'd be using this slide in 2023 but it's still fully
|
|
|
|
01:36:48.680 --> 01:36:54.840
|
|
relevant and it will remain relevant until the truth really is out there this has been giga-ohm
|
|
|
|
01:36:54.840 --> 01:36:59.640
|
|
biological a high resistance low noise information brought to you by a biologist thanks for joining
|
|
|
|
01:36:59.640 --> 01:37:06.120
|
|
me sorry i was late i'll see you again tomorrow night maybe tomorrow afternoon but tomorrow for
|
|
|
|
01:37:06.120 --> 01:37:22.040
|
|
sure because we do a show every day here at giga-ohm biological thanks very much
|
|
|
|
01:37:36.120 --> 01:37:53.160
|
|
so
|
|
|
|
01:38:06.120 --> 01:38:28.120
|
|
My one wheel has a flat, I was filming today, I got a flat, not so any way, but I think I have a solution, I'm in the mail tomorrow.
|
|
|
|
|