WEBVTT 00:00.000 --> 00:02.000 You 00:30.000 --> 00:32.000 You 01:00.000 --> 01:02.000 You 01:30.000 --> 01:32.000 You 02:00.000 --> 02:02.000 You 02:02.000 --> 02:04.000 You 02:04.000 --> 02:06.000 You 02:06.000 --> 02:08.000 You 02:08.000 --> 02:10.000 You 02:10.000 --> 02:12.000 You 02:12.000 --> 02:14.000 You 02:14.000 --> 02:16.000 You 02:16.000 --> 02:20.000 The introduction is going to be about two minutes longer. 02:20.000 --> 02:26.000 So if you want to take the time to tweet this out or to send it to your friends, that would be great. 02:26.000 --> 02:28.000 Essentially a worse case scenario. 02:28.000 --> 02:32.000 I'm afraid that the latest data tells us that we're dealing with essentially a worse case scenario. 02:32.000 --> 02:37.000 I'm afraid that the latest data tells us that we're dealing with essentially a worse case scenario. 02:37.000 --> 02:42.000 I'm afraid that the latest data tells us that we're dealing with essentially a worse case scenario. 02:56.000 --> 03:02.000 I think truth is good for kids. We're so busy lying. We don't even recognize the truth no more than society. 03:02.000 --> 03:08.000 We want everybody to feel good. That's not the way life is. 03:08.000 --> 03:14.000 But you can tell if someone's lying, you know, you can sort of feel it in people. 03:14.000 --> 03:18.000 And I have lied. I'm sure I'll lie again. I don't want to lie. 03:18.000 --> 03:22.000 You know, I don't think I'm a liar. I try not to be a liar. I don't want to be a liar. 03:22.000 --> 03:25.000 I think it's like really important not to be a liar. 03:26.000 --> 03:30.000 Hittari Mama was first today. Hittari Mama was first. 03:30.000 --> 03:50.000 Mark, Mark, Mark, you're so funny. 03:50.000 --> 03:55.000 As a surgeon, you should be speaking out on this. You could save lives. 03:55.000 --> 03:59.000 What the fuck? I didn't know anything about this. How am I meant to know about this? 03:59.000 --> 04:03.000 You know what? I don't know about everything. 04:03.000 --> 04:11.000 You shouldn't think that just because you're on to something that someone else should be doing it to, 04:11.000 --> 04:16.000 buddy. We've all got our own jobs to do. I don't tell you what to do. 04:16.000 --> 04:18.000 What the fuck? 04:18.000 --> 04:22.000 Anyway, the reason why I try to get through to you to get your number of call. 04:22.000 --> 04:25.000 You're busy last time and I'm not busy. 04:25.000 --> 04:33.000 I went back through the podcast and I'm afraid it wasn't good enough, mate. 04:33.000 --> 04:40.000 I don't know how to explain this to you, but it was just over an hour. 04:40.000 --> 04:44.000 But the thing is, what was relevant was literally just 15 minutes. 04:44.000 --> 04:51.000 It was just dragged out and there was not enough substance, not enough facts, not enough details. 04:51.000 --> 04:56.000 I would also say, try and work on your presentation. 04:56.000 --> 05:01.000 You drag things out and speak very slowly. 05:01.000 --> 05:07.000 You need to be a bit more punchy. A bit more punchy, a bit more animated, a bit more light. 05:07.000 --> 05:12.000 I don't know if you were just a bit flat back to you. 05:12.000 --> 05:21.000 I think your style, you just could inject yourself with a little bit more energy, a little bit more animation. 05:21.000 --> 05:29.000 What I was going to do actually was create some clips of the podcast and do a sub-stack, 05:29.000 --> 05:35.000 and obviously credit you and reference you, and talk about the opioid deaths and all that kind of stuff. 05:35.000 --> 05:40.000 So that was the plan. I'm sorry, mate. I've just got a lot of fucking podcasts. 05:40.000 --> 05:43.000 I've got a lot of recordings. 05:43.000 --> 05:47.000 I'm trying to keep the quality of the content quite high. 05:47.000 --> 05:52.000 I'm afraid on this occasion it just wasn't good enough. 05:52.000 --> 05:57.000 I know that sounds harsh, but I'm just being honest with you. 05:57.000 --> 06:02.000 The quality wasn't up to scratch. 06:02.000 --> 06:06.000 All right, mate. Bye. 06:06.000 --> 06:13.000 Stop lying! Stop lying! 06:13.000 --> 06:21.000 I'm not sure exactly who he is. His name is J. J. Cooley, and I believe he's a consultant for CHD. 06:21.000 --> 06:29.000 And I believe he has a PhD in some sort of scientific discipline from what I understand. 06:51.000 --> 07:10.000 MUSIC 07:21.000 --> 07:31.000 Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 07:31.000 --> 07:36.000 This is GIGO and biological coming to you on the 14th of May, 2024. 07:36.000 --> 07:41.000 Still trying to dispel the enchantment that is being cast by ever more people, 07:41.000 --> 07:47.000 with ever more comfort and fame as a result of being a whistleblower that didn't have principles 07:47.000 --> 07:52.000 in 2020 or 2021 or even 2022. 07:52.000 --> 07:57.000 But pulled their head out a couple years later after everybody had already been transfected 07:57.000 --> 07:59.000 and terrified for two years. 07:59.000 --> 08:05.000 These fake heroes need to be ended, and we're going to be doing a few more shows this month 08:05.000 --> 08:09.000 to try and make sure that people wake up to this nonsense. 08:09.000 --> 08:14.000 It's a great big show. It's a great big club, and we are not in it. 08:15.000 --> 08:20.000 And it's because the truth that is perceived is all that matters to these people, 08:20.000 --> 08:25.000 and they all know that's the game. They all know that's the game. 08:25.000 --> 08:32.000 And so they've been recruiting more and more monkeys to participate in this little charade, 08:32.000 --> 08:38.000 to do interviews and to promote ideas and to just throw more mud in the water 08:38.000 --> 08:42.000 so that nobody can figure it out when it's so super easy. 08:42.000 --> 08:46.000 Ladies and gentlemen, there was no spread in New York City. 08:46.000 --> 08:49.000 Infectious clones are the only real threat. 08:49.000 --> 08:52.000 Police evil batches were likely distributed. 08:52.000 --> 08:56.000 Transfection and healthy humans has always been dumb. 08:56.000 --> 08:59.000 The protocols were murder gained a function as a mythology. 08:59.000 --> 09:04.000 The Scooby-Doo mystery that they tricked you into solving is a real op. 09:04.000 --> 09:11.000 And it only takes a spectacular commitment to that lie in order to make sure that the whole Earth 09:11.000 --> 09:19.000 will solve this mystery and accept the presuppositions of the giant global estates. 09:19.000 --> 09:24.000 And anybody that disagrees with these people has attributed bad motives. 09:24.000 --> 09:27.000 That's how Meryl Nast wins arguments. 09:27.000 --> 09:32.000 That's how Robert Malone is a little arguments. 09:32.000 --> 09:38.000 That's how they all win arguments. JJ's bad mark is boring. 09:38.000 --> 09:40.000 That's how they do it ladies and gentlemen. 09:40.000 --> 09:42.000 They're not talking about what we talk about. 09:42.000 --> 09:44.000 They're not talking about our ideas. 09:44.000 --> 09:49.000 If Mark is so lame, then just summarize his ideas for us. 09:49.000 --> 09:52.000 But no, no. 09:52.000 --> 09:56.000 That tiny little medler from the other side of the pond couldn't do that. 09:56.000 --> 10:01.000 He's got to spend his time promoting Sasha La Topova and Robert Malone. 10:01.000 --> 10:07.000 These people are all out there to make sure that you don't see, even when you're shown. 10:07.000 --> 10:10.000 That's really the magic of what they're doing here. 10:10.000 --> 10:15.000 And instead of explaining it simply like we try to do, I mean, come on ladies and gentlemen, 10:15.000 --> 10:21.000 if you can't see them for the charades and the charlatans and the fakers that they are, 10:21.000 --> 10:24.000 I don't know what to tell you, but I'm going to try and help. 10:24.000 --> 10:26.000 You can learn our history. That's one way to do it. 10:26.000 --> 10:32.000 Mark Koolack's website at Mark Housatonic ITS is really one of the best places to try and 10:32.000 --> 10:38.000 find a handhold and pull yourself out of this illusion, 10:38.000 --> 10:47.000 which has been cast upon us by charlatans on TV and also charlatans on social media. 10:47.000 --> 10:54.000 Charlatans on social media like Robert Malone, like Pierre Corey, like Jessica Rose, 10:54.000 --> 10:59.000 like all the people that have been put in front of us with a limited spectrum of debate 10:59.000 --> 11:05.000 that can never seem to just keep us focused on the biology to tell us to love our neighbors, 11:05.000 --> 11:07.000 not to trust the vaccine schedule. 11:07.000 --> 11:13.000 They haven't been able to find these words because these words aren't part of the wave of lies 11:13.000 --> 11:15.000 that they have created. 11:15.000 --> 11:22.000 The wave of lies that has captured our university students around the world has captured our young parents. 11:22.000 --> 11:28.000 This wave, which is continuous with the vaccine schedule, lie, and criminal enterprise 11:28.000 --> 11:32.000 that existed before the pandemic, and if we're going to teach our children how to surf it, 11:32.000 --> 11:34.000 we're going to need to show it to them. 11:34.000 --> 11:38.000 The way you show them this wave of lies is to keep them focused on the biology, 11:38.000 --> 11:42.000 get them not to take the bait on social media and television, 11:42.000 --> 11:44.000 and teach them to love their neighbors. 11:44.000 --> 11:48.000 And sometimes that means accepting the fact that their neighbors, 11:48.000 --> 11:53.000 being skilled TV watchers, are going to be afraid and confused. 11:53.000 --> 11:59.000 Ladies and gentlemen, the way this works, the reason why we are still on the air is because of people like you 11:59.000 --> 12:03.000 that decided to give me $10 a month or $5 a month. 12:03.000 --> 12:05.000 Some people are giving more than that. 12:05.000 --> 12:10.000 Some people give as much as $290 a year. 12:10.000 --> 12:19.000 And it is that commitment by these people that really, really, really keeps me on the air, 12:19.000 --> 12:26.000 and it is for all of them that I continue to work as hard as I can to try and produce the message 12:26.000 --> 12:27.000 that's going to break us free. 12:27.000 --> 12:33.000 I swear, just like you, in 2020, I thought I would just do one more video. 12:33.000 --> 12:35.000 One video would break it. 12:35.000 --> 12:40.000 One video that just showed that this New World Order illusion 12:40.000 --> 12:45.000 about viruses and pandemics was being exaggerated and overplayed 12:45.000 --> 12:47.000 would shift the paradigm. 12:47.000 --> 12:48.000 That's what I thought would happen. 12:48.000 --> 12:53.000 It would shift the paradigm and everybody would suddenly realize and come to awaken. 12:53.000 --> 12:57.000 But now, after four years of being sophisticated, 12:57.000 --> 13:02.000 I realize that this illusion is sustained through our active participation. 13:02.000 --> 13:05.000 And if we are going to engage in United Noncompliance, 13:05.000 --> 13:08.000 we need to understand how the illusion is sustained. 13:08.000 --> 13:10.000 It is sustained. 13:10.000 --> 13:17.000 It is sustained through your participation and your choice to listen to the wrong people, 13:17.000 --> 13:23.000 to ask the wrong questions and those people that have been put in front of us, 13:23.000 --> 13:29.000 that we have been misled by social media to believe our heroes outspoken critics. 13:29.000 --> 13:34.000 These people are part of the illusion and we sustain it by listening to them, 13:34.000 --> 13:37.000 by listening to them, so we've got to stop. 13:59.000 --> 14:11.000 Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. 14:11.000 --> 14:12.000 Welcome to the show. 14:12.000 --> 14:16.000 This is Giga Home Biological High Resistance Low Noise Information Brief, 14:16.000 --> 14:17.000 brought to you by a biologist. 14:17.000 --> 14:19.000 It was the 15th of May, 2024. 14:19.000 --> 14:23.000 I'm coming to you live from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, as usual, 14:23.000 --> 14:24.000 from the back of my garage. 14:24.000 --> 14:25.000 It's a nice day today. 14:25.000 --> 14:26.000 The back door is open. 14:26.000 --> 14:27.000 There's fresh air flowing. 14:27.000 --> 14:29.000 And I'm excited to be here today. 14:29.000 --> 14:30.000 I feel a little better than yesterday. 14:30.000 --> 14:35.000 I have some health issues that don't need to be described that have kept me off the air. 14:35.000 --> 14:37.000 Yesterday I needed one day of rest. 14:37.000 --> 14:40.000 My vocal cords are also a little injured. 14:40.000 --> 14:41.000 I think so. 14:41.000 --> 14:42.000 I'm trying to talk a little softer. 14:42.000 --> 14:44.000 I do have it a little hotter over there. 14:44.000 --> 14:46.000 Ladies and gentlemen, I'm a human just like you. 14:46.000 --> 14:47.000 I rent my house. 14:47.000 --> 14:50.000 I am lucky enough to be married to my best friend. 14:50.000 --> 14:54.000 And I have three children that are for the most part healthy. 14:54.000 --> 15:00.000 But we moved here in 2016 and me being the dumbass that I was in 2016 still. 15:00.000 --> 15:04.000 An academic biologist wanting to climb the ladder of tenure. 15:04.000 --> 15:10.000 When we had our daughter in the United States, we gave her the entire vaccine schedule. 15:10.000 --> 15:15.000 Knowing in our heart that this was not what happened to our boys in Norway. 15:15.000 --> 15:20.000 Knowing in our heart that something wasn't right the moment that they gave her two shots on our birthday. 15:21.000 --> 15:26.000 Within seconds of coming out of her mama and into the world. 15:26.000 --> 15:29.000 She was violated and we were traumatized by that. 15:29.000 --> 15:40.000 But we were not sophisticated enough to understand that the United States medical system upon return to the United States would have become the criminal enterprise that it was. 15:40.000 --> 15:49.000 And that even the nicest general practitioner would be completely unaware of the criminal enterprise that the vaccine schedule was. 15:50.000 --> 15:58.000 And so I am left to be just as ashamed as many other parents are in finally realizing it too late. 15:58.000 --> 16:06.000 In 2022 when I first watched the movie Vaxxed which was several months after being contacted and starting to consult for Robert F Kennedy Jr. 16:06.000 --> 16:10.000 That's how stupid I was. 16:10.000 --> 16:18.000 That in 2022 despite running around my head cut off for two years trying to figure out the lab leak Scooby-Doo mystery. 16:18.000 --> 16:33.000 I still hadn't reflected on my own family and my own experience with the idea that the vaccine schedule that I experienced in Norway and the Netherlands with my first two kids is bizarrely different than the vaccine schedule that my GP is pushing on me now. 16:33.000 --> 16:37.000 And if it wasn't for the strength and courage of my wife. 16:38.000 --> 16:45.000 I think that we would have we would have given my kid all of the shots before six months and I don't think we did that. 16:45.000 --> 16:51.000 If only because my my wife was breastfeeding her and we delayed them. 16:51.000 --> 16:54.000 Now. 16:54.000 --> 17:00.000 I don't think it's fair for my daughter and my sons for me to talk about them but. 17:00.000 --> 17:07.000 It's hard for me to keep a straight base and say that they're the same kids with the same gifts. 17:07.000 --> 17:15.000 And if the pattern that I see right now continues I can assure you that. 17:15.000 --> 17:25.000 Ladies and gentlemen I don't know how to express it to you any other way than to say that intramuscular injection of any combination of substances with the intent of augmenting the immune system is dumb. 17:25.000 --> 17:36.000 And I like many people and ashamed of myself for having been an academic biologist for 20 years and having so focused on the brain and microscopes and optics. 17:36.000 --> 17:44.000 That when I became a parent I was absolutely naive to the criminal enterprise that was happening in the United States and. 17:44.000 --> 17:52.000 I was blessed enough to be outside of the United States so that when we came back in 2016 there was something there that could happen. 17:53.000 --> 17:56.000 That could wake me up. 17:56.000 --> 17:59.000 But I did not wake up early enough. 17:59.000 --> 18:03.000 And that's why I do what I do. 18:03.000 --> 18:21.000 Transfection in healthy humans is criminally negligent and there are hundreds of thousands of academic biologists that will eventually come to realize that they could have known and should have known had they weren't focused on microscope optics and and and their grant proposals but just had sat down and thought about it a little bit. 18:21.000 --> 18:32.000 About what was being said on television about what Meryl Nasse and Robert Malone and and Ed Wong all agree on. 18:32.000 --> 18:41.000 Which is there was a pandemic of a particularly dangerous virus that came from a bat cave one way or another. 18:42.000 --> 18:54.000 And so this agreement is a real big problem because this agreement represents the spread of bad ideas that have caused all of our children all of our neighbors all of the skilled TV watchers in the world to believe. 18:54.000 --> 19:08.000 That a risk additive pandemic virus has circulated the globe and continues to that is biologically differentiable from the background of hundreds of thousands of these signals. 19:08.000 --> 19:19.000 And is so differentiable from the background that we have a high fidelity phylogenetic tree of a virus over the last five years that has no precedence in history. 19:19.000 --> 19:27.000 We've never tracked OC 43 like this, despite the fact that all these virologists agree that OC 43 is all around the world. 19:27.000 --> 19:30.000 So why aren't we actively tracking it? 19:31.000 --> 19:37.000 Why aren't we using special primers for all of these known endemic coronaviruses and following their evolution. 19:37.000 --> 19:47.000 Why didn't anybody want to do that before the pandemic so that we could study how an endemic virus evolves and compare that to a pandemic virus. 19:47.000 --> 20:05.000 These are some of the questions that once you start realizing that they didn't investigate any of these things that they could have purportedly they could have because in 2020 they rolled out lateral flow tests for for zero prevalence and they rolled out PCR tests for viral presence. 20:05.000 --> 20:09.000 The only problem was whether the cycle count was right or not. 20:10.000 --> 20:17.000 And so this fidelity existed before the pandemic otherwise Abbott laboratories wouldn't have been able to develop the products they did and the speed that they did. 20:17.000 --> 20:30.000 This technology existed before the pandemic otherwise the PCR kits could not have been ordered from BGI in China and sent to companies in the United States in April for them to test weekly. 20:30.000 --> 20:39.000 The fidelity obviously already existed if if a company in China can supply the PCR tests that are used in America in April 2020. 20:39.000 --> 20:46.000 So why didn't we have these PCR tests in circulation already before that tracking the endemic virus seeing as pandemic potential. 20:47.000 --> 20:56.000 According to Ed Wong and Robert Malone has been working on it for years and and and and Merrill Nass who's a bio bio weapons expert for years. 20:56.000 --> 21:06.000 Why weren't they advocating for a regular surveillance of the background coronavirus so that we would know if one came out and we could follow it and we would understand this stuff. 21:06.000 --> 21:18.000 We could wait until 2020 to assemble the first ever year over year phylogeny of a coronavirus. 21:18.000 --> 21:25.000 Why do we let someone like Kevin McCurnan who cut his teeth at the Human Genome Project. 21:26.000 --> 21:40.000 Why is he there why isn't it a virologist why isn't it any of the other hundreds of thousands of molecular biologists that supposedly understand how basic molecular biology works. 21:40.000 --> 21:46.000 Why is it that we have to have Kevin McCurnan of all people. 21:46.000 --> 21:56.000 Why was Kevin McCurnan so early on the primers of the PCR test not on the PCR being useful or not useful but the primers being wrong. 21:56.000 --> 22:15.000 It's because these people like it or not were put in place very early to make sure that the spread of bad ideas would make sure that everybody believed that there was an RNA molecule also spreading around the world and that's why all of these people tell the same basic story. 22:15.000 --> 22:20.000 Kevin McCurn, Charles Ricksy, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. 22:20.000 --> 22:42.000 Merrill Nasse, Mary Holland, Robert Malone, Pierre Corey, Jim Thorpe, the whole wellness company everybody that works for them there's not one of them not one of them not one single one of them can see the possibility that a background signal adequately characterized 22:42.000 --> 22:51.000 before the pandemic could have been misconstrued as spread at the start of the pandemic because we have zero data pre 2020. 22:51.000 --> 22:55.000 Not one person of these geniuses can see it. 22:55.000 --> 23:06.000 Instead their assumption is because they had it three or four times like Merrill Nasse had it three times apparently even never died because she uses Ivermectin I guess. 23:07.000 --> 23:10.000 There's no other way for me to see it. 23:10.000 --> 23:29.000 Having the experience that I've had with almost all of them that they are coordinatedly lying in order to maintain the illusion that a pandemic occurred that again a function spike protein is at play and that again a function spike protein and the transfections could be responsible for a lot of the damage in the shot. 23:29.000 --> 23:36.000 And if it's not that of course it's the double stranded DNA that's in the shots that contaminated them because we rushed them. 23:36.000 --> 23:43.000 And this story is shared now across Ed Wong who may deny that there's a lot of injury. 23:43.000 --> 23:55.000 He may deny where it comes from but the contamination he will eventually accept and probably clamor for the the finding of Pfizer. 23:55.000 --> 24:00.000 And Robert Malone has accepted it. Kevin McCarran has accepted it. Kevin McCurnan has accepted it. 24:00.000 --> 24:06.000 They've all accepted it because this is the narrative that they've been curating from the very beginning. 24:06.000 --> 24:07.000 Now how would I know that? 24:07.000 --> 24:24.000 Well the way to know it is to be around in 2020 and to know what all these people were saying in 2020 because I actively lost a job at a university medical school in the United States in 2020 I was keenly aware of what other people were saying. 24:24.000 --> 24:35.000 I was defending myself to a medical faculty trying to regain my career position by defending myself with the things that people were saying. 24:35.000 --> 24:47.000 So unfortunately for these medlers I know what they were saying in 2020 because some of them I was taking their argument and using it to try and edify my position in the faculty's eyes. 24:47.000 --> 24:53.000 So when I look back on it and I realize oh my gosh all of these people were getting me to do it. 24:53.000 --> 24:59.000 They were encouraging me to do it. They made me think that I had solved the mystery and that everybody was denying it. 24:59.000 --> 25:03.000 And so I went even harder to end the paint on this idea. 25:03.000 --> 25:06.000 And that's how they've done it to all of us. 25:06.000 --> 25:11.000 It doesn't matter if they had you on the telephone or you in a signal chat or not. 25:11.000 --> 25:21.000 If you were watching Brett Weinstein's podcast in 2020 it is just too bad for you. 25:23.000 --> 25:27.000 If you were listening to these people in 2020 it's just too bad for you. 25:27.000 --> 25:39.000 If you listen to Robert Malone in 2020 it's too bad for you. 25:39.000 --> 25:44.000 So I've played this video so many times of course it hurts but it's always relevant to say. 25:44.000 --> 25:57.000 I really think that these people are involved in a military national security operation wherein they are required to stay within this limited spectrum of debate. 25:58.000 --> 26:06.000 And I think it is very very likely that most of the people on that side of the screen are never going to wake up. 26:06.000 --> 26:11.000 And if they do wake up it will be on the timeline of the national security operation. 26:11.000 --> 26:26.000 The best way to do it if you really want to do some reading is to download the sparse pandemic document because that is a timeline that includes post pandemic traumas and post pandemic recovery which does seem to really be that we are basically following that timeline 26:26.000 --> 26:36.000 where right now it's okay to reveal that the pandemic countermeasures may have injured some people and that's totally alright. 26:36.000 --> 26:45.000 But still we're not being precise they are still calling them vaccines all those people over there still call them vaccines. 26:46.000 --> 26:58.000 And the really bizarre thing about this is is that Denny Rancor has data that shows that there was no risk additive spreading pathogen and interestingly so does so does John Bode. 26:59.000 --> 27:13.000 John Bodeman also has this data but because he has been bamboozled by Steve Kirsch and by by Kevin McCurnan he is satisfied with selling his CDC book and getting to talk in front of some places. 27:13.000 --> 27:25.000 Notice that John Bodeman was not invited to talk in front of the Senate. Notice that Steve Kirsch wasn't invited to talk in front of the Senate because these people don't have anything really useful to say to the Senate. 27:25.000 --> 27:33.000 Because Steve Kirsch right now is talking exclusively about the transactions and transformations and calling them vaccines that's his job. 27:34.000 --> 27:44.000 And John Bodeman is being overshadowed by these people. Nobody wants John Bodeman's book to really be a bestseller. Nobody wants everybody to read John Bodeman's book. 27:46.000 --> 27:56.000 They just want to control John Bodeman. That's why they don't promote his book. That's why not one of them have really you know they would think they would tweet it weekly after all the time that they've spent with him. 27:56.000 --> 27:59.000 He was on Steve Kirsch's weekly committee for two years or more. 27:59.000 --> 28:12.000 But like a lot of these people they've either agreed not to say that there was murder in 2020 or have agreed not to not to focus on that. 28:16.000 --> 28:27.000 But there's no other way for me to characterize John Bodeman's behavior other than somehow or another he is being meddled with so that he's not saying what he said when he was on my program. 28:28.000 --> 28:37.000 He's not saying what he was saying in the beginning which is that there's no evidence for a viral spread. It's just that these people are dying of stuff. They're being killed. 28:38.000 --> 28:48.000 And he still hasn't really found that language and I find it very curious that he spends so much time with Steve Kirsch and with these other people that I'm sure are liars. 28:49.000 --> 28:51.000 I've already told them that they are liars. 28:51.000 --> 29:08.000 And so there you have it. I mean again remember another anecdote which is really funny is that when I went to the Boston announcement of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. I actually sat one row in front of Meryl Nass who was sitting with Abby Rockefeller. 29:09.000 --> 29:22.000 And we were told by John Bodeman who was sitting right next to me that he had coffees and coffee and bagels with with Meryl and Abby before he saw us at this at this event. 29:23.000 --> 29:30.000 He was just invited for a morning coffee and bagels and it turned out that Abby Rockefeller was there. 29:31.000 --> 29:43.000 But of course that would be conspiracy theory to think that that Meryl Nass and Abby Rockefeller getting together with John Bodeman would be anything significant other than bagels and coffee. 29:46.000 --> 29:52.000 See what I see here ladies and gentlemen are people that have been co-opted people that have been told this is with what you've got. 29:53.000 --> 30:02.000 This is what you're going to get. Your book will be fine if you just shut up and ignore Jay and ignore Jessica Hockett and ignore Mark Koolack even though you know how all these people are. 30:02.000 --> 30:07.000 He sat next to Mark Koolack and I at Boston had Bobby's announcement. 30:08.000 --> 30:23.000 In fact at that Boston announcement Steve Kerr thought it was funny and he came over to introduce me with two Pierre Corey who I'd already met Pierre looks so uncomfortable. 30:23.000 --> 30:29.000 And then I was able to pull Mark over and say hey do you guys know Mark Koolack talk about awkward moments. 30:29.000 --> 30:38.000 Wow. So we are dealing with a limited spectrum of debate that has been sculpted by actors that have been put in place. 30:38.000 --> 30:44.000 Maybe some of them were added later because they were so off script by 2021. I don't know. 30:45.000 --> 31:07.000 But I do know that my personal view of this included people like Charles Ricksey and Kevin McCann and and Johanna something or other from from from Germany and Nick the space cat and all these people were involved in in sort of trying to make sure that the lab leak idea 31:07.000 --> 31:16.000 and a risk additives additive spreading pathogen these kinds of things were not questioned by me usefully from 2020 on. 31:16.000 --> 31:22.000 And in fact I think I was closest to the truth in 2020 in May or June or July. 31:22.000 --> 31:34.000 And then sometime after that the meddling of drastic and other people just got me back focused on the lab leak cover up and the fact that they're covering it up and so obviously it must mean we were right. 31:34.000 --> 31:44.000 And again like I say I can do only so much I can only apologize so much for having been consciously and intelligently manipulated by these people. 31:44.000 --> 31:56.000 Because when multiple people decide to lie to you together and you don't know it because they're in Japan and Virginia and in New Jersey. 31:57.000 --> 32:16.000 We're all vulnerable. And that's how social media is working right now controlling hundreds of thousands millions of people's conscious habits and thoughts with cartoons with with nonsense. 32:16.000 --> 32:22.000 And that's how our principle of informed consent which requires understanding has been completely taken away from us. 32:22.000 --> 32:43.000 And I would argue that the people on television and the people on social media that we've come to understand as these these forces for good and bad or forces for globalism and for for patriotism these are all actors their job is to prevent you from waking up and realizing 32:43.000 --> 32:48.000 that the American population has been governed by lies for decades. 32:48.000 --> 32:58.000 Don't want you to wake up to the idea that the vaccine schedule has been a criminal enterprise for decades because he has participated in it for decades. 32:58.000 --> 33:08.000 They don't want you to hear what he said in 2021 and compare it to what Meryl Nast said two days ago or otherwise you're going to be like wait what? 33:08.000 --> 33:20.000 Because understand clearly what this six minute video of Robert Malone speaking says is something that I would have said if given a microphone in 2020 already. 33:20.000 --> 33:32.000 That's how convinced I was that there was a lab leak and that I was on and that I was solving the problem and that we might get something out there quick enough people would realize that this was this problem and we would take it more serious. 33:32.000 --> 33:35.000 I didn't know I was just trying to help. 33:35.000 --> 33:42.000 And people like this perpetuated this in millions of people around the world thinking that. 33:43.000 --> 33:57.000 The question to ask was bad cave virus or gain a function lab leak listen to this this is 2021 2021 three three three years ago. 33:57.000 --> 34:04.000 Okay, three years ago. 34:04.000 --> 34:21.000 It was strange that after moving the virus is it is basically a man made virus used for some people call it warfare. 34:21.000 --> 34:25.000 Okay, we can deal with that word and it was released. 34:25.000 --> 34:40.000 Do you find it strange that pouchy and the rest of the fun bunch really disavow themselves from it. 34:41.000 --> 34:43.000 To your point. 34:43.000 --> 34:44.000 I was really nice. 34:44.000 --> 34:47.000 Let's go. Let's take a ride in the way back machine. 34:47.000 --> 35:04.000 And remember once a long ago that Mr Biden came out and said we're going to get to the bottom of this lab leak hypothesis and I'm going to ask and I'm going to insist on the CIA giving me the full story and we're going to get to the bottom of this right away. 35:05.000 --> 35:08.000 And then it has been nothing but crickets chirping ever since. 35:08.000 --> 35:17.000 And that but I swear after he did that I saw his face get long ever since he just seems to have kind of gotten grim. 35:17.000 --> 35:28.000 And I you know this you know this is like did he finally get access to the Kennedy you know notes. 35:29.000 --> 35:36.000 It sure looks like he had a come to Jesus moment and he didn't like it very much. 35:36.000 --> 35:51.000 And I mean many of my peers are increasingly of the opinion that this has hallmarks of a product of gain of function research. 35:51.000 --> 35:57.000 The thing that I can't which is a fancy way of saying lab manufacturers. 35:57.000 --> 36:02.000 The thing I can't sort out and I don't know if we're ever going to be able to sort it out. 36:02.000 --> 36:14.000 Is did this sneak out the back door in Wuhan and yes the signs are that both my friends at DoD and the good Dr. Fauci. 36:15.000 --> 36:20.000 You know we're told that you cannot do gain of function research it's illegal. 36:20.000 --> 36:27.000 And so they they kind of pivoted and said oh it's okay we're going to let the Chinese do it for us. 36:27.000 --> 36:32.000 That makes a lot of sense and we're going to send them a bunch of money to do it. 36:32.000 --> 36:41.000 So so there's those data. 36:41.000 --> 36:44.000 Those those breadcrumbs exist. 36:44.000 --> 36:49.000 So gain of function research and coronaviruses definitely happened. 36:49.000 --> 36:52.000 Is this the product of that gain of function research. 36:52.000 --> 36:58.000 This is another one of those it looks like a duck it walks like a duck it quacks like a duck but how can you have a proven to duck. 36:58.000 --> 37:00.000 You know maybe it's a pigeon. 37:00.000 --> 37:02.000 But it sure looks like a duck. 37:02.000 --> 37:10.000 And the thing I can't sort out and I don't know anybody can is did it escape out the back door at the Wuhan lab. 37:10.000 --> 37:14.000 You know by and they're filling the blank there's a number of ways that could happen. 37:14.000 --> 37:22.000 There was an event in the laboratory and people got infected and then they walked around and spread it because it has a long pro drone period. 37:22.000 --> 37:29.000 Was somebody selling dead carcasses from laboratory animals at the back door to go to the seafood market. 37:29.000 --> 37:31.000 Could be. 37:31.000 --> 37:37.000 You know or or you know animals off experiment that kind of thing totally makes sense. 37:37.000 --> 37:40.000 Having worked at a primate research center. 37:40.000 --> 37:46.000 You know there's always interest in recycling lab animals after they've been used. 37:47.000 --> 37:57.000 It's such a curious statement is he suggesting that while he was working in primate labs in California or wherever they were that people were reusing the monkeys. 37:57.000 --> 38:01.000 Taking them and selling them selling body parts. 38:01.000 --> 38:03.000 I mean. 38:03.000 --> 38:11.000 The mythology that he's laying down right here is no different than the mythology that Peter Desac would like to be out there. 38:12.000 --> 38:15.000 It's no different than the mythology that Nathan Wolf would like to be out there. 38:15.000 --> 38:20.000 It's no different than the mythology that Vincent rack and yellow would like to be out there. 38:20.000 --> 38:23.000 It's no different than any of their mythologies. 38:23.000 --> 38:26.000 It's exactly the same mythology. 38:26.000 --> 38:29.000 What part about this is different. 38:29.000 --> 38:37.000 He thinks that that you can take a lab animal to the market and it might cause a pandemic he thinks that it could come out on somebody's shoes. 38:37.000 --> 38:47.000 I remember that we had in 2020 Stephen Hatfield telling people that they should take their shoes off and wear an apron when they dealt with their kids. 38:47.000 --> 38:55.000 Stephen Hatfield who has been on Tommy's podcast with Robert Malone a couple three times now. 38:55.000 --> 39:06.000 Once you see them for the liars that they are and realize that an MD like Robert Malone could have easily explained what was happening in this graph that from 2014 we had a pretty good control. 39:06.000 --> 39:13.000 On pneumonia and then suddenly at the start of 2021 there was a gigantic spike in pneumonia deaths. 39:13.000 --> 39:22.000 And that happened repeatedly over the next couple years and those pneumonia deaths might actually be because we mistreated them. 39:22.000 --> 39:32.000 Maybe we use dexamethasone and sent them home without antibiotics and they died in their care home like he described in this video earlier. 39:33.000 --> 39:47.000 Maybe we put a lot of people on high flow oxygen and caused them to get what we call the viral pneumonia and then didn't give them any treatment for it thought that that was progressing a RDS and kill them. 39:47.000 --> 39:53.000 I'm suggesting that it's a combination of that for anecdotal pain. 39:54.000 --> 39:58.000 That would be the pain that James Giordano says is required. 39:58.000 --> 40:03.000 So they had to kill people with a protocol in several places in the United States. 40:03.000 --> 40:12.000 But New York City is a very interesting case because people like Jessica Hockett have talked to people like policemen and firemen. 40:12.000 --> 40:16.000 And when they are shown the numbers they're like I didn't see that. 40:16.000 --> 40:18.000 I mean we have to visit. 40:18.000 --> 40:20.000 They have to go to dead people all the time. 40:20.000 --> 40:22.000 They have to investigate deaths all the time. 40:22.000 --> 40:34.000 If there were thousands and thousands and thousands of more deaths per week then there should be hundreds of traumatized EMTs and police officers and fire departments, 40:34.000 --> 40:41.000 members that have collected those bodies over those four and five weeks and been absolutely stunned. 40:42.000 --> 40:46.000 But there are absolutely positively none of those people around. 40:46.000 --> 40:52.000 And of course those questions could have been asked in 2020 and 2021. 40:52.000 --> 41:03.000 And maybe some people were asking them but Jessica was on some kind of other complete forum yelling into that forum that was completely faced the other way from where I was yelling. 41:04.000 --> 41:16.000 And Mark Koolack was all over here chasing down the leaves of George Webb and trying to get George Webb to promote his work because he thought maybe George Webb and his associates were still pretty good people. 41:16.000 --> 41:25.000 And so all of us were fooled by different people and all of us have seen different stages at this lala palooza of lies. 41:25.000 --> 41:31.000 But in the end if we want to engage in non-compliance we have to identify the liars and stop listening to them. 41:32.000 --> 41:37.000 Because in the end their symphony of lies actually is very harmonious. 41:37.000 --> 41:52.000 If you listen to that talk with Ed Wong yesterday, Ed Young yesterday, and he talks about the current state of the world and why it's our fault and all this other stuff, it's not that different than what these guys are saying, it's just a different fault. 41:53.000 --> 41:55.000 It happens in a different way. 41:55.000 --> 42:04.000 In the illusion of Robert Malone it could be a bachelor's student with some equipment that they bought on eBay making a gain of function virus in their garage. 42:04.000 --> 42:13.000 For Ed Wong that would be ridiculous, it's already dangerous enough in bad caves and because of overpopulation it's eventually going to happen again, it's unavoidable. 42:13.000 --> 42:19.000 This one happened because of overpopulation and are encroaching on nature. 42:19.000 --> 42:25.000 Not dissimilar to what Brett Weinstein was selling for a year and a half in 2020 and 2021. 42:25.000 --> 42:38.000 And once you see that all these people have just been juggling each other's opinions pretending to have something that opposes that one and then you're forced to get on board with them because they're the ones that have a million followers. 42:39.000 --> 42:44.000 They're the ones that have a sub stack that people read or a podcast that everybody listens to. 42:48.000 --> 43:07.000 Only Robert Malone is able to be on nine podcasts a day and also breed horses and emus and build new sheds and also put out 17 to 27 pages of sub stack per day and also coordinate the early treatment trials that he did for two and a half years. 43:07.000 --> 43:18.000 And still be a consultant and go around to all these international COVID summits two times a year to Romania and Belgium and and cruises off the coast of Turkey. 43:18.000 --> 43:27.000 This guy is an illusion. He is part of the same illusion that Ed Young is about that the PBS News are about. 43:27.000 --> 43:39.000 And do you find it strange that you know animals off experiment that kind of thing totally makes sense having worked at a primary research center. 43:39.000 --> 43:46.000 You know, there's always interest in recycling lab animals after they've been used in any way you can. 43:47.000 --> 43:54.000 And if it was a country like China, where you got people eating, you know, buying live animals in a market. 43:54.000 --> 44:02.000 It's located just a couple blocks from the, if I apologize to, I kind of, why wouldn't that happen? 44:02.000 --> 44:04.000 You'd expect it to happen almost. 44:04.000 --> 44:06.000 They'd have to have pretty tight controls. 44:06.000 --> 44:07.000 Keep it from happening. 44:07.000 --> 44:14.000 You know, the janitor is, you know, looks at this collection. 44:14.000 --> 44:19.000 These are all like, hey, I can make an extra buck or yen or whatever the monetary thing is. 44:19.000 --> 44:21.000 And you know, how can you say this wouldn't happen? 44:21.000 --> 44:34.000 The other thing that could have happened, and you mentioned the word bio warfare or bio weapon, there's no way to rule out that somebody didn't let this puppy lose intentionally. 44:35.000 --> 44:44.000 And who would have let who would want to let loose an agent in the literally beating industrial heart of China. 44:44.000 --> 44:48.000 I doubt it was the people's Republic of China. 44:55.000 --> 44:58.000 That's extraordinary because remember this is 2021. 44:59.000 --> 45:03.000 He's talking to Ed Nealey and, and Paul Cottrell. 45:03.000 --> 45:13.000 And he's saying that he doubts that the Chinese government would have released a virus in China, and especially not in Wuhan. 45:13.000 --> 45:18.000 Now he's going to go on to imply that the United States might have released it there. 45:18.000 --> 45:27.000 And they might have figured that the Chinese government, because they've invested a billion dollars a year in infrastructure to respond to a future spark. 45:27.000 --> 45:39.000 Future sparse pandemic that it would be safe to attack China in Wuhan and that China's infrastructure would stop it from going pandemic. 45:39.000 --> 45:45.000 This is actually what Robert Malone said in 2021. 45:47.000 --> 45:51.000 This video right here that you're about to hear is real. 45:52.000 --> 46:05.000 And if this doesn't convince you that he is just an actor playing for the same team as Tony Fauci and Rick Bright and Peter Navarro and all these people that are ruling us with a mythology of lies. 46:08.000 --> 46:20.000 I don't know if I can help you anymore. It might be time for you to find a new tutor, a new, a new teacher, a new somebody on a new biologist in your pocket. 46:20.000 --> 46:25.000 Find a different one because this is the message. This is how it was done. 46:25.000 --> 46:29.000 Somebody didn't let this puppy loose intentionally. 46:30.000 --> 46:38.000 And who would have let who would want to let loose an agent in the literally beating industrial heart of China? 46:39.000 --> 46:42.000 I doubt it was the People's Republic of China. 46:43.000 --> 46:51.000 So I can't resolve these different potential ways that this agent could have gotten loose. 46:52.000 --> 47:05.000 But the Fearing Cleveland site and some of the other signs, whether or not there is an HIV sequence in there, it kind of looks an awful lot like something that came out of laboratory research. 47:06.000 --> 47:14.000 But in a sense, it kind of doesn't matter because here we are. It's gone worldwide. 47:15.000 --> 47:28.000 Now, one of the things about this, all this issue about what happened in Wervland is that I had this colleague that I published with before who works for one of our three letter agencies in the government. 47:29.000 --> 47:35.000 And early on, he assured me that this absolutely was not a lab. 47:35.000 --> 47:43.000 It was not an engineered virus. Absolutely. He said my guys have looked at it carefully and it has none of the signs of being engineered. 47:43.000 --> 47:46.000 Well, he said that so early in the outbreak. 47:47.000 --> 47:53.000 So we're supposed to believe that Robert Malone's phone call on January 4th from Michael Callahan. 47:54.000 --> 48:07.000 Essentially is a lie. He didn't know it was a lie until now because he didn't say it was a lie when he was talking to Brett Weinstein on June in June of 2021. This is now August. 48:08.000 --> 48:13.000 And so already with just two data points, you can see how his narrative has progressed. 48:14.000 --> 48:21.000 He's smiling because he knows he's going to get away with it because he's part of this system. The system is going to back him. 48:23.000 --> 48:27.000 These other medlers like Pierre Corey are going to back him. 48:27.000 --> 48:35.000 They're going to defer to the legendary Robert Malone, just like Brett Weinstein and Steve Kurz still do. 48:37.000 --> 48:45.000 That's why he's so giddy and competent confident here that whatever he says is great because these people don't understand me anyway. 48:46.000 --> 48:49.000 I understand you Robert and you're full of shit. 48:49.000 --> 48:51.000 That in and of itself is a little odd. 48:53.000 --> 49:00.000 And he told me the story that the Chinese had this amazing infrastructure that they'd spelt over a billion a year on. 49:01.000 --> 49:09.000 For years and years after the SARS outbreak designed to contain any SARS-like virus, whole bunch of infrastructure. 49:10.000 --> 49:16.000 Now clearly that didn't work so good. It's like to imagine a line in France to keep the German tanks away. 49:16.000 --> 49:22.000 You remember how well that worked but they thought they had this and we thought they had this too. 49:23.000 --> 49:35.000 One could imagine a scenario wherein an agent was released with the full expectations that it would damage the Chinese economy but they would keep it in check. 49:36.000 --> 49:41.000 Did that happen? I don't know. It's a possibility. 49:41.000 --> 49:45.000 The other thing about this, as you mentioned, Daryl, is that 49:47.000 --> 49:56.000 It is a possibility. It is a possibility that the United States government released this in China fully expecting them to contain it. 49:57.000 --> 50:06.000 It is a possibility, says Robert Malone, that somebody like a janitor could have taken a lab animal to a market to make extra money and that could have caused it. 50:07.000 --> 50:08.000 It is also possible. 50:11.000 --> 50:27.000 And so all the presuppositions of the state are being given to you on a platter by Robert Malone and he is not usefully questing the application of transformation or transfection to anyone in our society, usefully right now. 50:28.000 --> 50:34.000 It won't be for four more months after this that he will give the December 21 presentation where he finally says these are untested. 50:34.000 --> 50:41.000 You need at least five years. It can cross the blood brain barrier, can hurt the heart and it can reset your genetically reset your immune system. 50:43.000 --> 50:49.000 He didn't say that until everyone that was going to get a shot or a double shot took it. 50:50.000 --> 50:54.000 Every old person was mandated in their care home to take it. 50:55.000 --> 51:03.000 And he didn't say a word, not one useful word about the fact that transformation or transfection could be especially hard on an issue. 51:04.000 --> 51:06.000 It was an aged immune system. 51:07.000 --> 51:12.000 Maybe even harder than a respiratory disease as long as you treated it right. 51:14.000 --> 51:18.000 Maybe even harder than a urinary tract infection as long as you treated it right. 51:19.000 --> 51:27.000 But these old people died of starvation, of urinary tract infections, of ARDS induced by pure oxygen of application. 51:27.000 --> 51:34.000 They died of cold. They died of thirst in Scotland in the UK. Do you think they didn't do that in America? 51:37.000 --> 51:47.000 You don't think they lied about this stuff in America too to create all the anecdotal cases they possibly could so that there would be enough people that said, well, I don't know, I know a 30 year old. 51:48.000 --> 52:05.000 How many of those did we hear? How many of those did we need to hear? How many of those are in this initial little bump here and then a continued symphony of liars got that bump to be repeated over and over again because viral pneumonia isn't treatable by antibiotics? 52:11.000 --> 52:15.000 If they have a low pulse ox, you better put them on oxygen right away. 52:18.000 --> 52:30.000 Do you think that care homes weren't doing that? You don't think care homes did care homes have the proper equipment to apply oxygen or do they just start giving oxygen to people that these little devices said they needed it? 52:31.000 --> 52:38.000 Do you think it's beyond the shadow of a dog that they couldn't have produced? Let's say 10,000 of these that sucked? 52:39.000 --> 52:56.000 You don't think that they would do that for trillions of dollars in a multi-generational system of control to be put in place? You don't think they'd lie about a few things? You don't think they'd co-opt a few liars? Pay a few people to say, hey, make a big deal about Ivermectin for us, would you? 52:57.000 --> 53:12.000 Hey, here's a few studies that we faked on purpose. Show people how fake they are and then write a book about it and we'll promote you and you and your family will be part of this ruling elite, this national security operation. 53:12.000 --> 53:39.000 How is it possible that in 2024, the former scientific advisor of CHD, Children's Health Defense, the premier anti-vax thing in America, could be on an internet show and not say anything about the vaccine schedule in general and about how in the last eight or nine years, you've been working tirelessly to bring attention to the criminal enterprise that is the vaccine schedule and you're so grateful that there's so much more information. 53:42.000 --> 53:53.000 The pandemic has brought light to them. Does that, Robert, does does Mary Holland ever say that? Maybe does Meryl Nass ever say that? Absolutely not. 53:53.000 --> 54:01.000 Meryl Nass is a bioweapons expert that spends more time trying to convince you of her expertise than of teaching you anything that she actually knows. 54:02.000 --> 54:16.000 And when she does teach you something, she will say exactly what her best friend Robert Malone just said in 2021 that I was begging to say in 2020 back when I was completely bamboozled by this theater. 54:16.000 --> 54:27.000 And so these brilliant MDs have not progressed one iota in three years in their understanding of what happened and their sophistication and being able to explain it. 54:27.000 --> 54:33.000 And neither of them has progressed to understand that murder was used. 54:33.000 --> 54:39.000 Listen carefully to this medler named Meryl Nass. 54:39.000 --> 54:46.000 Well, maybe it wasn't a lab leak. You know, maybe it was deliberate. That's one thing you have to consider. But the other thing is you just look at the genome. 54:46.000 --> 54:54.000 There are so many different things that have been changed. There's at least a dozen things in that genome that are very odd. 54:55.000 --> 55:09.000 And that cause specific medical problems. Okay, so let's just destroy Meryl Nass for the poser that she is right here with those words and those words alone. 55:09.000 --> 55:25.000 Let's play him one more time before I put her into the wood chipper, please play these words. We're not even going to need to eat 30 seconds to absolutely mangle her and show her for the medler and an immunomethologist that she is. 55:25.000 --> 55:28.000 She is totally part of this. Watch. Listen. 55:29.000 --> 55:36.000 Well, maybe it wasn't a lab leak. You know, maybe it was deliberate. That's one thing you have to consider. But the other thing is you just look at the genome. 55:36.000 --> 55:44.000 There are so many different things that have been changed. There's at least a dozen things in that genome that are very odd. 55:45.000 --> 55:51.000 And that cause specific medical problems. So. 55:51.000 --> 55:59.000 So are you ready to see to hear me say in about three sentences why that is the biggest crock of bullshit. 55:59.000 --> 56:07.000 And I've known that this angle has been a big crock of bullshit since 2020. Why? Well, I'll tell you why. 56:07.000 --> 56:27.000 Because Richard Fleming and Charles Rixie and Kevin McCairn and Kevin McKernan and Jessica Rose and all these other fakers who have been telling you that the spike protein is especially dangerous for exactly the same reasons that Robert Malone said in the previous video 56:28.000 --> 56:41.000 and for exactly the same reasons that this faker has said it here fear and cleavage site. There's like so many changes in the spike protein and they all cause specific disease symptoms. 56:44.000 --> 56:56.000 So here's a very simple question for all these fake people. Then why haven't we been using the high fidelity sequencing data to track these things that cause specific things to happen. 56:57.000 --> 57:07.000 And the danger had passed. If the fear and cleavage site is so frickin important for its for its infectivity then why weren't we told when the fear and cleavage site disappeared from the spike protein. 57:07.000 --> 57:14.000 If the HIV sequences are so important for understanding what the hell's going on then why isn't anybody tracked them. 57:14.000 --> 57:24.000 What about the staphyl toxin and teratoxin B homology that Robert Malone and all these other people have been mentioning for four years. Why haven't we tracked that? 57:25.000 --> 57:38.000 Why don't they tell us when the mutations in the Omicron 5.6 are now outside of the HIV. So we're really afraid now that they that the flying AIDS has evolved again. They don't talk shit. 57:38.000 --> 57:45.000 Meryl Nast doesn't know what she's talking about. She can't tell you how these sequences have evolved across these different variants. 57:45.000 --> 57:52.000 Even though she's happy to say that there are 11 things that were changed that caused specific disease symptoms. 57:53.000 --> 58:01.000 Meryl Nast you are a liar. You are a fake doctor expert and this is all you need. 58:01.000 --> 58:08.000 That's already shows you don't know what you're talking about. You're just reading and saying shit that people told you to say. 58:09.000 --> 58:15.000 And anyone in drastic anyone like me Kevin McCarron could have said this nonsense. 58:15.000 --> 58:21.000 Even Charles Rixi wouldn't have needed his big excel sheet to say this shit in 2020. 58:21.000 --> 58:23.000 Are you joking? 58:24.000 --> 58:44.000 And we're supposed to believe that her doors to freedom opposing the who is going to save us when she won't talk about the prep act or electing people to erase the prep act or or getting people to approach it as a Seventh Amendment violation and getting the prep act struck by a single circuit court decision. 58:45.000 --> 58:52.000 She's not saying strict liability here or that transformation and transfection were always criminally negligent. 58:52.000 --> 58:56.000 I knew that from the beginning. She's saying that this was a lab leak. 58:56.000 --> 59:03.000 Maybe it was released. Maybe it wasn't the exact same shit that Robert Malone said to Paul Cottrell in 2021. 59:03.000 --> 59:09.000 Remember that the most important the most important sub stack that Meryl Nast has ever written. 59:09.000 --> 59:13.000 You can even see it because it's in the title is defending Robert Malone. 59:13.000 --> 59:19.000 A week later, Robert Malone came out of a list of bad guys and it's all these clowns. 59:19.000 --> 59:28.000 It's one big show and the problem is is they're going to get they're going to get very desperate now because the show has no more depth. 59:28.000 --> 59:33.000 The stage has not got another layer of scenery anymore. 59:33.000 --> 59:37.000 They have a big problem on their hands now because a guy like me exists. 59:37.000 --> 59:39.000 I know who they've talked to for four years. 59:39.000 --> 59:44.000 I know who was sending emails and who was copied so they can't fake that they don't know each other anymore, 59:44.000 --> 59:51.000 which is also funny because part of their shtick on the Internet is to pretend that they don't know each other. 59:51.000 --> 01:00:02.000 Like that's why Robert Malone never mentions Judy Mickovitz and Judy Mickovitz would never mention Robert Malone. 01:00:02.000 --> 01:00:08.000 That's why the science advisor for CHD is a bio weapons expert that's never spoke out against the vaccine schedule 01:00:08.000 --> 01:00:11.000 in a useful way. 01:00:11.000 --> 01:00:18.000 That's why a Columbia professor was appointed to be the head of CHD right when they were making a lot of progress 01:00:18.000 --> 01:00:24.000 and right when the vaxx thing was really hitting it and boom. 01:00:24.000 --> 01:00:27.000 It's medlers and sabotage. 01:00:27.000 --> 01:00:28.000 That's what it is. 01:00:28.000 --> 01:00:31.000 That's how the anti-vaxx movement has been stopped. 01:00:31.000 --> 01:00:36.000 Medlers and sabotage. 01:00:36.000 --> 01:00:40.000 That's why I was released from CHD. 01:00:40.000 --> 01:00:47.000 That's why nobody wants to talk about my contributions to this book because one of my six contributions to this book 01:00:47.000 --> 01:00:50.000 is that they didn't need a virus to do it. 01:00:50.000 --> 01:00:56.000 One of my contributions to this book is that Cina Bavari already predicted the pandemic in 2019 01:00:56.000 --> 01:01:04.000 that it was a postdoc of Ralph Barrick and said that Remdesivir would be useful. 01:01:04.000 --> 01:01:10.000 They don't like the stuff that I have in this book because infectious clones is in this book and it's explained very well 01:01:10.000 --> 01:01:18.000 how infectious clones is kind of used as a proxy for RNA virology but it's not a good proxy. 01:01:18.000 --> 01:01:22.000 That's why they don't sell the green book. 01:01:22.000 --> 01:01:26.000 CHD doesn't really want to sell Brian Hooker's book because this book actually tells the truth 01:01:26.000 --> 01:01:30.000 that the vaccine schedules a criminal enterprise. 01:01:30.000 --> 01:01:34.000 That's why they sell Robert Malone's book too. 01:01:34.000 --> 01:01:39.000 And I believe that's why Meryl Nash is starting a new nonprofit just to keep this stuff divided 01:01:39.000 --> 01:01:42.000 just to keep all these efforts stupid. 01:01:42.000 --> 01:01:45.000 We wouldn't want to focus on changing the American system, 01:01:45.000 --> 01:01:48.000 pulling America out of the who. We wouldn't want to do that. 01:01:48.000 --> 01:01:51.000 We've got to change the who. We've got to influence the who. 01:01:51.000 --> 01:01:54.000 Do you know how stupid that is? 01:01:54.000 --> 01:02:03.000 That Steve Kirsch and Brett Weinstein and actually Meryl Nash have all told us that thank goodness 01:02:03.000 --> 01:02:06.000 the language in the who treaty has changed a little bit. 01:02:06.000 --> 01:02:13.000 It seems like the who is responding to our pressure. 01:02:13.000 --> 01:02:16.000 So keep in mind I'm going to play it one more time. 01:02:16.000 --> 01:02:20.000 I want you to understand how in four years in four years, 01:02:20.000 --> 01:02:24.000 how this makes every one of these molecular biology masters 01:02:24.000 --> 01:02:27.000 absolutely positively a liar. 01:02:27.000 --> 01:02:31.000 If you said for example that there are amyloid generating 01:02:31.000 --> 01:02:35.000 sequences or pre onogenic like sequences in the spike protein, 01:02:35.000 --> 01:02:39.000 but you didn't bother to track them through variants. 01:02:39.000 --> 01:02:42.000 Stop lying. 01:02:42.000 --> 01:02:46.000 If you were focused on the spike protein since 2020, 01:02:46.000 --> 01:02:50.000 but you haven't tracked the HIV inserts as they appeared 01:02:50.000 --> 01:02:52.000 or disappeared in different variants. 01:02:52.000 --> 01:02:54.000 Stop lying. 01:02:54.000 --> 01:02:59.000 If you say like Meryl Nash just said that there are what? 01:02:59.000 --> 01:03:07.000 And that genome that are very odd and that cause specific medical problems. 01:03:07.000 --> 01:03:10.000 Specific medical problems. 01:03:10.000 --> 01:03:11.000 Stop lying. 01:03:11.000 --> 01:03:16.000 It's so ridiculous for her to claim that because it's real simple. 01:03:16.000 --> 01:03:18.000 The biology is real simple. 01:03:18.000 --> 01:03:22.000 There were changes in the spike protein that caused specific problems. 01:03:22.000 --> 01:03:26.000 So why wouldn't you have tracked it from the very beginning to show 01:03:26.000 --> 01:03:29.000 that those specific problems follow those things? 01:03:29.000 --> 01:03:34.000 And when we could tell people when the virus was becoming less or more dangerous, 01:03:34.000 --> 01:03:36.000 you liar. 01:03:37.000 --> 01:03:39.000 She works in Maine. 01:03:39.000 --> 01:03:44.000 And yet she's so sophisticated with this virus that she understands 01:03:44.000 --> 01:03:49.000 all the subtleties of these 11 or so things that cause specific medical problems. 01:03:49.000 --> 01:03:50.000 Stop lying. 01:03:50.000 --> 01:03:52.000 It's there's no other way to see it. 01:03:52.000 --> 01:03:55.000 That alone is already criminal. 01:03:55.000 --> 01:03:56.000 That's a liar. 01:03:56.000 --> 01:04:01.000 And anybody who has taken this stance that includes almost all of these monkeys 01:04:01.000 --> 01:04:02.000 is a liar. 01:04:03.000 --> 01:04:05.000 And I've said it for years already. 01:04:05.000 --> 01:04:08.000 Why the hell aren't you tracking these sequences? 01:04:08.000 --> 01:04:12.000 Why aren't you telling us whether they're in this delta or that delta? 01:04:12.000 --> 01:04:16.000 Why do you keep going back to the original spike protein and then making that 01:04:16.000 --> 01:04:20.000 in in vitro studies and saying that's amyloidosis? 01:04:20.000 --> 01:04:23.000 Do you see the lies that they are telling you ladies and gentlemen? 01:04:23.000 --> 01:04:27.000 It's gigantic and it is uniform across all of these people. 01:04:27.000 --> 01:04:30.000 And it is very, very simple to see. 01:04:30.000 --> 01:04:35.000 Because if they're so sure for four years that these sequences are gaining 01:04:35.000 --> 01:04:39.000 a function and that things were put in them in order to cause havoc, 01:04:39.000 --> 01:04:44.000 to cause specific outcomes, why the hell have they never been able to express 01:04:44.000 --> 01:04:49.000 the predictions that that model makes? 01:04:49.000 --> 01:04:55.000 And there you see it's the same bullshit academicians that are 01:04:55.000 --> 01:04:59.000 pulling this trick of saying that they're doing science and that they're 01:04:59.000 --> 01:05:03.000 using reductionist model of shit, but they don't actually go anywhere with the 01:05:03.000 --> 01:05:04.000 model. 01:05:04.000 --> 01:05:06.000 That's the model right there. 01:05:06.000 --> 01:05:10.000 The model is is that what the spike protein, what? 01:05:10.000 --> 01:05:12.000 You have to consider. 01:05:12.000 --> 01:05:15.000 But the other thing is you just look at the genome. 01:05:15.000 --> 01:05:19.000 There are so many things, different things that have been changed. 01:05:19.000 --> 01:05:23.000 There's at least a dozen things in that genome that are very odd. 01:05:23.000 --> 01:05:29.000 And that cause specific medical problems. 01:05:29.000 --> 01:05:32.000 So that's really it. 01:05:32.000 --> 01:05:35.000 That's really it. 01:05:35.000 --> 01:05:38.000 For me, there's no other way to see her than a reader. 01:05:38.000 --> 01:05:40.000 She's reading off of something. 01:05:40.000 --> 01:05:43.000 So she says exactly what she wants to say. 01:05:43.000 --> 01:05:48.000 And it is exactly the bullshit story that they want us to pass on to our children 01:05:48.000 --> 01:05:52.000 so that they are enslaved by it. 01:05:52.000 --> 01:05:57.000 I'm going to let the rest of this video play because I want you to hear how much 01:05:57.000 --> 01:06:02.000 she doubles down on this stupid, complicated explanation for a very simple 01:06:02.000 --> 01:06:05.000 concert of lies. 01:06:05.000 --> 01:06:09.000 Told on behalf of the biosecurity state that she almost certainly works for. 01:06:09.000 --> 01:06:14.000 As part of a group of people that has kept the lid on the autism epidemic, 01:06:14.000 --> 01:06:19.000 kept the lid on the autism moms and prevented CHD from doing anything 01:06:19.000 --> 01:06:25.000 useful to oppose the vaccine schedule and instead operating under this stupid 01:06:25.000 --> 01:06:27.000 rubric of health freedom. 01:06:27.000 --> 01:06:33.000 She is an integral part of that meddling and that sabotage. 01:06:33.000 --> 01:06:41.000 So there are things in that genome that are there to impact your immune system 01:06:41.000 --> 01:06:45.000 and make it harder for you to fight off the infection. 01:06:46.000 --> 01:06:51.000 People knew when they created the vaccine, for instance, the spike was very toxic. 01:06:51.000 --> 01:06:57.000 Why would you take the most toxic part of this virus and make a vaccine out of that? 01:06:57.000 --> 01:06:58.000 Total lie. 01:06:58.000 --> 01:06:59.000 Oh darn it. 01:06:59.000 --> 01:07:01.000 Total lie. 01:07:01.000 --> 01:07:05.000 And it's the lie that they've been telling since 2020 that people like Kevin 01:07:05.000 --> 01:07:13.000 McCairn and Walter Chestnut and Flemming and all these people in 2020 don't forget 01:07:13.000 --> 01:07:15.000 how many of them knew it was the spike. 01:07:15.000 --> 01:07:16.000 It was the spike. 01:07:16.000 --> 01:07:17.000 It was the spike. 01:07:17.000 --> 01:07:22.000 Even Jessica Rose was talking about the spike and writing, writing shit 01:07:22.000 --> 01:07:28.000 substacks about the spike, spike, spike. 01:07:28.000 --> 01:07:32.000 That was the narrative that the biosecurity state had planned in this version of the 01:07:32.000 --> 01:07:36.000 spars pandemic to try and trick people into believing that they rushed it, 01:07:36.000 --> 01:07:40.000 that they made a mistake, that they were naive and that the dangers of 01:07:40.000 --> 01:07:47.000 transfection could be blamed on a spike protein instead of on the methodology itself, 01:07:47.000 --> 01:07:51.000 that all of these people that work for the biosecurity state know full well, 01:07:51.000 --> 01:07:56.000 transfection and transformation was always going to do nothing but hurt people. 01:07:58.000 --> 01:08:02.000 But the idea was to get us to accept that it wasn't that, that it was a spike protein. 01:08:02.000 --> 01:08:06.000 That was the narrative that I called out already in 2021. 01:08:06.000 --> 01:08:11.000 And ever since then these people have been pulling their hair out trying to get me to accept 01:08:11.000 --> 01:08:14.000 that that's not the way it is, that there really was a virus. 01:08:14.000 --> 01:08:17.000 That's why they paid me for a year to work for Bobby. 01:08:17.000 --> 01:08:21.000 That's why they paid me to help write that book because they thought that that book and that 01:08:21.000 --> 01:08:23.000 experience would get me on board. 01:08:23.000 --> 01:08:25.000 That's why I was let go from CHD. 01:08:25.000 --> 01:08:28.000 They did an interview with me about the book and then they didn't let release the book, 01:08:28.000 --> 01:08:33.000 the interview because they didn't think it really promoted the book. 01:08:33.000 --> 01:08:34.000 I shit you not. 01:08:34.000 --> 01:08:38.000 You can ask Brian Hooker because he knows he made the decision not to use that video. 01:08:38.000 --> 01:08:43.000 I guess because Mary didn't like it or Meryl didn't like it or someone else didn't like it. 01:08:43.000 --> 01:08:48.000 But all I said was is that a lot of what isn't that book is probably just people talking shit. 01:08:48.000 --> 01:08:50.000 And in reality RNA can't pandemic. 01:08:50.000 --> 01:08:57.000 That's a message that wasn't ready for prime time because it wouldn't have sold the red book. 01:08:57.000 --> 01:08:59.000 And so they let me go. 01:09:00.000 --> 01:09:05.000 No care for my family, no care for the things that I had done for three years that are supposedly 01:09:05.000 --> 01:09:10.000 the reason why they hired me in the first place because the people who run CHD within that 01:09:10.000 --> 01:09:12.000 group of people, there are medlers. 01:09:12.000 --> 01:09:17.000 There are medlers there that are making sure that these autism moms and these autism 01:09:17.000 --> 01:09:24.000 dads never actually reach the goal of usefully challenging the vaccine schedule in America. 01:09:24.000 --> 01:09:25.000 That's not their goal. 01:09:26.000 --> 01:09:28.000 That's why they talk about health freedom all the time. 01:09:28.000 --> 01:09:31.000 And that's why they fight about censorship all the time. 01:09:31.000 --> 01:09:34.000 And that's why they will never usefully challenge the prep act. 01:09:37.000 --> 01:09:39.000 I don't know how to say it any other way. 01:09:39.000 --> 01:09:43.000 Those people are being meddled with and sabotaged and we have to save them somehow. 01:09:43.000 --> 01:09:47.000 They have to wake up and throw these people out of the organization. 01:09:47.000 --> 01:09:48.000 Never listen to them again. 01:09:49.000 --> 01:09:52.000 There's no other way to see this. 01:09:52.000 --> 01:09:56.000 If she's telling you a story about 11 things that were changed in a genome that caused 01:09:56.000 --> 01:10:00.000 very specific disease symptoms and doesn't give a shit about tracking them, doesn't 01:10:00.000 --> 01:10:05.000 even think it's useful because it's not part of the limited spectrum of debate, 01:10:05.000 --> 01:10:09.000 ladies and gentlemen, and they don't think you're sophisticated enough to understand 01:10:09.000 --> 01:10:15.000 that the model that she put forth is bullshit. 01:10:16.000 --> 01:10:19.000 They don't think you're sophisticated enough to understand that that model means 01:10:19.000 --> 01:10:23.000 that you should have been keeping track of this shit for four years, right? 01:10:23.000 --> 01:10:24.000 Merrill, why didn't you? 01:10:24.000 --> 01:10:29.000 And Kim Iverson is not smart enough or sharp enough to flip that around and say, 01:10:29.000 --> 01:10:32.000 hey, so have you been tracking some of these sequences? 01:10:32.000 --> 01:10:36.000 What are these sequences and how they've changed over the last four years? 01:10:37.000 --> 01:10:39.000 These are liars, ladies and gentlemen. 01:10:39.000 --> 01:10:44.000 These are the most important, important, important, patent, fake actors that are 01:10:44.000 --> 01:10:48.000 designed to sustain the illusion that this is the question to ask. 01:10:48.000 --> 01:10:50.000 And it's 2024. 01:10:50.000 --> 01:10:55.000 And it is striking that Meryl Nass is the one who's doing it. 01:10:55.000 --> 01:11:02.000 Are things in that genome that are there to impact your immune system? 01:11:02.000 --> 01:11:06.000 Are they there and make it harder for you to fight off the infection? 01:11:07.000 --> 01:11:09.000 Are you going to be specific about it at all? 01:11:09.000 --> 01:11:11.000 Were they all placed there by the designer? 01:11:11.000 --> 01:11:15.000 Or are they part of RNA virology and just how mean they are? 01:11:19.000 --> 01:11:24.000 This is like the intellectual opposite of trying to argue about isolation, 01:11:24.000 --> 01:11:28.000 purification, and viral culturing for four days straight. 01:11:28.000 --> 01:11:30.000 It's exactly the same thing. 01:11:30.000 --> 01:11:36.000 It's just a hamster wheel of bullshit that keeps asking the same question 01:11:36.000 --> 01:11:37.000 over again, lab leak or natural. 01:11:37.000 --> 01:11:39.000 Wow, there's a lot of reasons to think both. 01:11:42.000 --> 01:11:47.000 Never getting to the useful answer, which is I guess because this part of the model is bullshit, 01:11:47.000 --> 01:11:50.000 I guess they must have murdered people to lie about it so that they could cover this. 01:11:51.000 --> 01:11:53.000 No, no, it's definitely a lab leak. 01:11:53.000 --> 01:11:58.000 I mean, you know, there's all these things in the virus that make it obvious that it's a lab leak. 01:11:59.000 --> 01:12:01.000 The virus is defined by their sequences. 01:12:01.000 --> 01:12:03.000 It is defined by their data. 01:12:03.000 --> 01:12:07.000 We're supposed to take their nature papers as word for the fact that this is going around. 01:12:07.000 --> 01:12:12.000 And in fact, I guess Meryl takes that word for the two because she had it three times, right? 01:12:12.000 --> 01:12:17.000 Her main issue is that she's given Ivermectin to people who said it made them feel better. 01:12:17.000 --> 01:12:19.000 And she's had it. 01:12:19.000 --> 01:12:21.000 She's had it three times. 01:12:23.000 --> 01:12:25.000 She's had it three times. 01:12:25.000 --> 01:12:30.000 I'm sorry, but anybody that says they've had COVID and three times in the pandemic is a liar, 01:12:30.000 --> 01:12:33.000 especially when they they couple that with I never tested. 01:12:33.000 --> 01:12:35.000 I don't know for sure, but I'm pretty sure I had it. 01:12:35.000 --> 01:12:37.000 That's exactly Meryl's story. 01:12:37.000 --> 01:12:40.000 It's no, no more, no more sophisticated than that. 01:12:40.000 --> 01:12:43.000 We are just dealing with coordinated lying. 01:12:43.000 --> 01:12:47.000 That's also why Meryl's been on stage with Robert Malone so often. 01:12:47.000 --> 01:12:51.000 That's why why Jessica Rose has been on stage so often. 01:12:51.000 --> 01:12:57.000 Most likely, Ryan Cole has been kind of co-opted by these people and controlled by these people. 01:12:57.000 --> 01:13:05.000 And now that's why he's being sued and can't really speak out anymore because because he's under their control. 01:13:05.000 --> 01:13:12.000 The narrative, you know, his narrative and what he can say now is very limited to the to the cancer and this kind of stuff. 01:13:12.000 --> 01:13:18.000 I don't think Robert Brian Cole is a bad guy, but I do think he could tell us the truth that these people are actually members. 01:13:18.000 --> 01:13:26.000 I'm sure he probably knows it, but like Peter, like Peter McCully is probably coerced and can't say it. 01:13:26.000 --> 01:13:35.000 People knew when they created the vaccine, for instance, the spike was very toxic. 01:13:35.000 --> 01:13:41.000 Why would you take the most toxic part of this virus and make a vaccine out of that part? 01:13:41.000 --> 01:13:47.000 You need to decrease the toxicity before you made the vaccine, but they didn't. 01:13:47.000 --> 01:13:59.000 Apparently, Meryl has multiple children, one that that treated doctors in New York City, which was a recent rebuttal that we didn't know about until very recently as a response to Jessica to Jessica Hockett. 01:13:59.000 --> 01:14:05.000 And then she also has a son, I think, that works at Google, which is great. 01:14:05.000 --> 01:14:12.000 There were when Fauci had his phone call on February 1 with about a dozen virologists. 01:14:13.000 --> 01:14:18.000 It was mentioned that there were six weird things in the genome. 01:14:18.000 --> 01:14:38.000 So on February 1, 2020, these spooky virologists who have worked on biological warfare issues before, as well as other things, were aware of six things in the genome that had probably been added in a laboratory. 01:14:38.000 --> 01:14:41.000 And we've discovered more since then. 01:14:41.000 --> 01:14:43.000 But we haven't bothered to track them. 01:14:43.000 --> 01:15:03.000 We can't tell you what they are, and we haven't bothered to track them through variants because we only want to talk about the original spike protein because the focus is to try and make sure that you realize, by solving the mystery in your head, that it was the choice of the spike protein that screwed up the transformation and 01:15:03.000 --> 01:15:06.000 transformation and transfection. 01:15:06.000 --> 01:15:27.000 That fateful decision made by the lady at Moderna in 45 minutes was the decision that ended up sealing the fate of a lot of these people when they got transfected or transformed to the most toxic protein in the whole viral genome, because I say so. 01:15:27.000 --> 01:15:30.000 I'm not actually a geneticist. 01:15:30.000 --> 01:15:37.000 If you actually, and I'm not a geneticist, I'm not a virologist, but I, you know, I can read. 01:15:37.000 --> 01:15:43.000 Sounds like me knowledge that to be true, and it's been documented. 01:15:43.000 --> 01:15:54.000 There's no question, but that this was designed in a lab, and I'd posit that there's a good chance that different parts of it were designed in different labs, and then those parts were put together. 01:15:54.000 --> 01:15:57.000 Yeah, that's even better. 01:15:58.000 --> 01:16:17.000 She's got an even more wonderful explanation. It was a combination of ideas. You know, maybe it was Robert Malone's collaboration with epivax that identified some, some universal epitopes that would be very useful in creating a immunogen that would always provoke zero prevalence. 01:16:17.000 --> 01:16:22.000 And then they took those, and they put them in a sequence, and then they pretended that that sequence was found. 01:16:22.000 --> 01:16:28.000 And the way they pretended that sequence was found is they just made a bunch of cloned DNA of it, and they spilled it in the water. 01:16:28.000 --> 01:16:35.000 And then when the Chinese tested for it, lo and behold, they found a sequence that contained our immunogen, and so then we pretended like we didn't know. 01:16:35.000 --> 01:16:42.000 It was just in the virus, and we gave everybody a shot, and lo and behold, five shots later, they still get antibodies. 01:16:43.000 --> 01:16:56.000 And we'll have people like Robert Malone and Meryl Nast say that this was all designer to make it infectious or to make a bio weapon when in reality, it was just following the basic NIH, you know, correlative immunity as antibodies. 01:16:56.000 --> 01:17:06.000 And so if we can make a protein that produces lots of antibodies, then basically we'll have a magic bullet that can create a vaccine that seems to work every time that passes the NIH muster every time. 01:17:06.000 --> 01:17:15.000 And it's interesting that Robert Malone and some of his collaborators were working on just such a thing for the decades before the pandemic started. 01:17:15.000 --> 01:17:25.000 The idea of universal epitopes for the immune system is something that he and Annie DeGroat and people were working on for years. 01:17:25.000 --> 01:17:39.000 So what would have been added in? How would it have worked? The idea that this was just a bunch of bad guys that were trying to make a virus worse is so dumb simple. 01:17:39.000 --> 01:17:55.000 The idea that these sequences are there, and it's obvious that it's a lab leak, but we're not going to worry about them or track them or see how they've evolved, even though we have 15 million sequences of this virus according to Kevin McCurnan of the Human Genome Project. 01:17:55.000 --> 01:18:00.000 Is he tracking any of these interesting sequences at all? 01:18:00.000 --> 01:18:14.000 In fact, he's spending all of his time talking about the double stranded DNA with his friend Buckhalter, who was involved in early PCR testing and probably made a profit from those patents early on. 01:18:15.000 --> 01:18:24.000 Just like I heard recently that this Roger Hodgkinson from Canada was also involved in a multi-seq company that was trying to do PCR testing. 01:18:24.000 --> 01:18:36.000 These people are all trying to get some because they know that the global elite have decided that the prison doors are about to close. 01:18:36.000 --> 01:18:50.000 They're about to close on your kids, your kids are about to be enslaved, and these people are working for the slavers, and that's why they tell you the mythology of the slavers instead of the biology that is the sacred biology that God gave us that is creation. 01:18:50.000 --> 01:18:53.000 This is just desecration of all those ideas. 01:18:54.000 --> 01:19:06.000 Sharing the humanized mouse model that we're sharing other things, it's certainly possible that bits from both left and there are other labs around the world. 01:19:07.000 --> 01:19:18.000 Coronavirus labs in Australia, in Singapore, in Taiwan, in Europe, they're all over, so other ones in the United States as well. 01:19:18.000 --> 01:19:32.000 So there are many possibilities from where it could have come from, and in my mind, we know it's been created in a lab, did it leak, or was it deliberately spread? 01:19:32.000 --> 01:19:38.000 And people say, first, well, it had to have been the Wuhan lab because that's where it showed up. 01:19:38.000 --> 01:19:48.000 But me, having a background in biological warfare, and tell you that you always are going to pick an organism so that it appears to be natural. 01:19:48.000 --> 01:19:52.000 So you're going to, if you want to spread it, you spread it in a place. 01:19:52.000 --> 01:19:56.000 So she's got a background in biological warfare, but she's never actually had a lab. 01:19:57.000 --> 01:19:59.000 Her background is blogging. 01:20:01.000 --> 01:20:10.000 Her background is being on congressional committees where she speaks against the old anthrax vaccine, kind of arguing for a new generation. 01:20:10.000 --> 01:20:19.000 In the same conversation that Robert Malone has featured in, interestingly enough, from years ago, she's never been usefully opposed to the vaccine schedule. 01:20:19.000 --> 01:20:23.000 She's always been a bioweapons expert. 01:20:24.000 --> 01:20:27.000 So how did she get on CHD? 01:20:27.000 --> 01:20:37.000 How did she become the scientific advisor to that group if her whole thing was bioweapons, not speaking out against the vaccine schedule before that? 01:20:37.000 --> 01:20:48.000 You see, the problem here with this poser that we have been forced to respect, or they are trying to coerce us into respecting. 01:20:48.000 --> 01:20:52.000 Let's say it like that the same way they coerced us with Robert Malone. 01:20:52.000 --> 01:20:56.000 Where the lab leak would appear, right? 01:20:56.000 --> 01:21:07.000 And you, if you are able, you use a strain that looks like a natural strain, but the people who made this, we're looking for a highly, highly virulent organism. 01:21:07.000 --> 01:21:10.000 And how does she know that motivation? 01:21:10.000 --> 01:21:15.000 What is she talking about other than the pandemic potential narrative? 01:21:15.000 --> 01:21:19.000 That there are people in those labs over there that are really trying hard. 01:21:19.000 --> 01:21:22.000 And there are people in the Ukraine labs that are trying really hard. 01:21:22.000 --> 01:21:25.000 There are labs in Laos that are trying really hard. 01:21:25.000 --> 01:21:28.000 And so if it didn't come from one, it'll come from another. 01:21:28.000 --> 01:21:38.000 And so she is ceding a narrative of perpetual pandemics that is based on the fact that there are pandemics in laboratories that are brought out of a bat cave. 01:21:39.000 --> 01:21:45.000 There are pandemics that are in laboratories that are laboratory viruses that have been passaged in cell culture. 01:21:45.000 --> 01:21:51.000 There are also those that have been passaged in humanized mice and golden hamsters. 01:21:51.000 --> 01:21:56.000 And there are also my goodness, these people have been lagoing together these viruses. 01:21:56.000 --> 01:22:05.000 It could be that some ideas came from Shengji Li and other ideas came from Australia for all I know, and they put them all together into one and let it go. 01:22:05.000 --> 01:22:11.000 And the worst case scenario is that this was a gain of function laboratory bio weapon all along. 01:22:14.000 --> 01:22:24.000 And so in 2024, the exact same narrative that I would have screamed from the top of the roofs in 2020 is now the narrative. 01:22:24.000 --> 01:22:37.000 That Robert Malone and Steve Kirsch and Alex Berenson and Harvey Reich and all of these absolute fakes on the internet. 01:22:37.000 --> 01:22:46.000 Brett Weinstein, his brother, Joe Rogan, all of these people, wittingly or unwittingly, have come to believe that the worst case scenario is this. 01:22:46.000 --> 01:22:57.000 The worst case scenario actually happened, but we're lucky that it wasn't a worse virus and that the next one that comes could either be the descendant of this one or a brand new one that comes from a new virus. 01:22:57.000 --> 01:23:02.000 Ed Wong is not sure where, but he's definitely sure that it will come. 01:23:03.000 --> 01:23:11.000 And please understand what I'm suggesting is that these people were put in place very early, and we were told that the train had no breaks. 01:23:11.000 --> 01:23:18.000 That they're no breaks because why? Well, because we're all immune. We're all vulnerable. Rather, none of us are immune. It's a brand new virus. 01:23:18.000 --> 01:23:28.000 And so we're going to need all these people to help slow the train down and all these people to control when it leaves the station because it's out of our our immune system control. 01:23:28.000 --> 01:23:32.000 It's out of our understanding. We don't even know for sure how bad this is going to be. 01:23:32.000 --> 01:23:38.000 The worst case scenario, according to people like Paul Catrell and Kevin McCarran, is a billion people dead. 01:23:38.000 --> 01:23:44.000 And imagine the knock on effects of a billion people dead to our infrastructure and our societies and our economic systems. 01:23:44.000 --> 01:23:49.000 That's what those people were telling you in 2020. That's what these people are telling you now. 01:23:49.000 --> 01:23:58.000 It's the exact same list of wrong questions, exact same list of hamster wheels that you can run as fast as you want. 01:23:58.000 --> 01:24:05.000 You can run until the bearings start to smoke and you're not going to save your kids from the criminal vaccine schedule in America. 01:24:05.000 --> 01:24:16.000 You're not going to save your kids from the poisonous food in America. You're not going to save your kids from the environmental toxins that are allowed to be put in processed food in America and not sold in the E. 01:24:16.000 --> 01:24:23.000 None of those things. You're never going to break through the illusion that you don't need sunscreen. That sunscreen is just poison lotion. 01:24:23.000 --> 01:24:27.000 You're never going to break through those illusions because none of these people are going to ask those questions. 01:24:27.000 --> 01:24:37.000 Meryl Nast still wants you to be concerned about the consequences of a lab leak with up to 11 sequences that were inserted and designed to hurt you. 01:24:37.000 --> 01:24:48.000 And unfortunately, these people who transmitted and transformed you with what she still calls vaccines didn't know any better and put the most toxic protein into that shot. 01:24:48.000 --> 01:25:00.000 And this is how the pandemic was created over four years with a concerted effort to lay down this Scooby-Doo mystery where we were trying to figure out who was lying to us and what they were lying about. 01:25:01.000 --> 01:25:07.000 And we have been led to believe that we have solved that mystery. We figured out that they lied about a lab leak and they tried to cover it up. 01:25:07.000 --> 01:25:21.000 And that explains very succinctly why people behave the way they did, why people doubled down, why people said things they shouldn't have said and why people are now admitting that the countermeasures hurt people. 01:25:22.000 --> 01:25:29.000 And while we're admitting that the countermeasures hurt people, not one of these people on the news and not one of these medlers that we've been talking about before. 01:25:29.000 --> 01:25:34.000 That's on the worst case scenario team is ever going to tell you that they murdered people and lied about it. 01:25:34.000 --> 01:25:38.000 Robert alone's never going to say they murdered people and lied about it. 01:25:38.000 --> 01:25:41.000 Meryl Nast is never going to say they murdered people and lie about it. 01:25:41.000 --> 01:25:44.000 She's going to tell you that she had COVID three times. 01:25:44.000 --> 01:25:48.000 And how does she treat COVID? I vermectin. 01:25:49.000 --> 01:25:52.000 Yep. Yep. That's right. 01:25:52.000 --> 01:26:05.000 So ladies and gentlemen, they took and for four years, these medlers have told us a story about a gain of function spike protein that Meryl Nast just told us two days ago with no more sophistication than could have been told in 2020. 01:26:05.000 --> 01:26:22.000 And they keep repeating it because they want the average mouth breathing TV watching skilled skilled social media user to believe that that gain of function spike protein can explain why their friend has chronic fatigue syndrome after getting three vaccinations. 01:26:22.000 --> 01:26:31.000 It can explain why their father who's 40 years old or 45 years old had a sudden aneurysm is not going to be there for them anymore. 01:26:31.000 --> 01:26:40.000 It can explain why your beautiful mom who was an actor on a Hollywood set got accelerated brain cancer and died in four months. 01:26:40.000 --> 01:26:47.000 It can explain all of that because they chose a gain of function spike protein those bastards. 01:26:47.000 --> 01:27:02.000 And that is a lie that all of these people want you to tell your children so that you don't understand that Robert Malone Pierre Corey, Meryl Nast, all of these people lied to you to cover up the fact that there was no pandemic. 01:27:02.000 --> 01:27:11.000 They lied to you to cover up the fact that they murdered a bunch of people and they amplified that story as evidence of a impending doom. 01:27:11.000 --> 01:27:23.000 And then with a carefully seeded and orchestrated national security exercise over the last three years, our children have become 99% enslaved by these lies. 01:27:23.000 --> 01:27:32.000 And if we don't start as adults dragging them out of this mythology, they will be trapped in it forever because that was the plan. 01:27:32.000 --> 01:27:40.000 There will be stress and more stress coming that will make it harder for us to pull them out the farther that we go down this timeline. 01:27:40.000 --> 01:27:55.000 So we must try to do it now because people like Robert Malone could have said this stuff in 2020 or 2021 and they did not. They didn't say it until 2022 or 2023 or 2024. 01:27:55.000 --> 01:28:10.000 And what they said in 2021 was exactly dead on balls narrative for what Fauci would have wanted them to say what James G. or Donald would have wanted them to say what any of these people who have already gained what this national security operation 01:28:11.000 --> 01:28:22.000 If you're going to get maximum compliance, they would have loved to have a guy like this, how loved to have a guy, a woman like Meryl Nast in place before the whole operation started. 01:28:22.000 --> 01:28:30.000 They would have loved to have a dupe like Brett Weinstein just begging for a podcast. They would have loved to have it and in fact they did. 01:28:30.000 --> 01:28:38.000 That's how we got here. That's why Robert Malone in 2021, December of 2021 was the first time he said anything useful. 01:28:38.000 --> 01:28:44.000 And then he said that the spike protein to go to your brain, go to your heart and genetically reset your immune system. 01:28:44.000 --> 01:28:56.000 The exact same story about a spike protein rather than transformation and transfection has fundamentally screwing up your immune system and he should have known from the very beginning because of course he did. 01:28:56.000 --> 01:29:04.000 His his role was to make sure that academic biologists like me would never realize it. 01:29:04.000 --> 01:29:21.000 And my job until the day I die is to make sure that all the people that I've ever worked with all the people that are academic biologists now have one place on earth to hear this message RNA can't pandemic RNA can't copy itself like that viruses don't make sense from a biological perspective. 01:29:21.000 --> 01:29:29.000 If you're going to try and blame millions and millions of cases and millions of millions of deaths on a single one that started from a point. 01:29:29.000 --> 01:29:38.000 There's no biological evidence for a phenomenon like that. There is a biological explanation for a bunch of lies causing a bunch of people to die. 01:29:39.000 --> 01:29:48.000 Lies about pneumonia lies about antibiotics ventilators pulse ox remdesivir medazlam lies about who was dying from what. 01:29:48.000 --> 01:29:57.000 And the coordinated effort for people like Robert Malone the no virus people and everybody on the PBS NewsHour to make sure that you thought excess deaths was novel virus. 01:29:57.000 --> 01:30:06.000 Excess deaths was gain a function virus. Maybe they're covering it up. Never mind the financial incentives. Never mind the fraud. Never mind the implausibility of what happened in New York City. 01:30:06.000 --> 01:30:15.000 Never mind tracking trace and the millions of dollars that were spent on it. Never mind what PCR fraud might be or not be. We're not going to explain any of that. 01:30:15.000 --> 01:30:19.000 And they still haven't four years later. 01:30:19.000 --> 01:30:27.000 They still haven't talked about it. We are in 2024 ladies and gentlemen and this this illusion is what they are sustaining. 01:30:27.000 --> 01:30:32.000 This is exactly the story that Merrill and Malone were out there to tell you from the very beginning. 01:30:32.000 --> 01:30:41.000 And that's why they're still telling you it in 2024 with no variation, no subtleties, no progress, no more understanding. It's all the same bullshit. 01:30:50.000 --> 01:31:00.000 I'm going to take a shot at something today. It's inspired by Jeff from Earth who's in the chat. Jeff from Earth wants to make some flashcards for the biology of giga-ome biological. 01:31:00.000 --> 01:31:08.000 And the first flashcard that he proposed was for PCR. And so I want to do a little impromptu discussion about that right now. 01:31:08.000 --> 01:31:14.000 And my goal is going to be, I don't know if I have this on yet. Sorry, I don't have this on yet. 01:31:14.000 --> 01:31:23.000 My goal is to try and work through this over a couple days to figure out what the right explanation is and how to do it as succinctly as possible. 01:31:23.000 --> 01:31:31.000 And I'm going to be basically starting from Jeff's assertion, which I kind of already like. So I'm just going to read it first. 01:31:32.000 --> 01:31:41.000 This should now be working. Yes. Okay. So I'm going to read this because I really want you to hear it because I do think it is useful. 01:31:44.000 --> 01:31:48.000 I don't know how far it is back here. 01:31:48.000 --> 01:31:57.000 So flashcards. And this is his proposal. I understand that it's not perfect. I mean, he doesn't think it's perfect. This is just what he sent to me the other day. 01:31:57.000 --> 01:32:03.000 And I think it's a really good way to do it. But I want to expand on this because I see the weaknesses here. 01:32:03.000 --> 01:32:11.000 The problematic oversight of emergency use authorized PCR test was the permitted counter narrative discussion. Perfect. 01:32:12.000 --> 01:32:26.000 The reality is that PCR is highly accurate in detecting whatever it is primed to detect. And this is critical to understand how the presence or absence of specific RNA or DNA signals could be made to appear or vanish depending on the desired outcome. 01:32:26.000 --> 01:32:35.000 I mean, Jeff is following victim to where I've been for four years that you think if you say it just right that people are going to have a light bulb go on. 01:32:35.000 --> 01:32:55.000 And it's not going to happen, but these, this is work that needs to be done, just like the work that we've done, which if I go very quickly back over here and escape from this, the work that we've been doing for a long time, which is codified on this slide, for example, 01:32:55.000 --> 01:33:09.000 is some attempt to try and distill some of these issues down to, you know, really fundamental ideas. And although I think Jeff has done a very good job with that in this text. 01:33:09.000 --> 01:33:19.000 A problematic overcycling of the emergency use authorized PCR test was the permitted counter narrative discussion. The reality is that PCR is highly accurate in detecting whatever it is primed to detect. 01:33:19.000 --> 01:33:29.000 It is critical to understand how the presence or absence of specific RNA or DNA could be signals could be made to appear or vanish depending on the desired outcome. 01:33:29.000 --> 01:33:44.000 So it's really, it's a really good shot at trying to say it in a three or four sentences and that as much as I am, I'm absolutely proud that somebody who watches my stream and has his own businesses and not a biologist at all can get that far. 01:33:44.000 --> 01:33:55.000 I mean, it almost brings me to tears. How proud I am that that my message has gotten so far that someone can write those words having never heard me say them. 01:33:55.000 --> 01:34:04.000 And so kudos to you, Jeff. The cut that you made in your head and the stuff that you put in there is working. 01:34:05.000 --> 01:34:15.000 But it's more it's it's it's much more complicated than that. And so I wanted to give people a general idea of what these monkeys haven't been saying for four years. 01:34:15.000 --> 01:34:26.000 People have been asking me to do it for a while. So I'm going to try and do it today. And I haven't rehearsed this. So I have no idea exactly what's going to come out of my mouth. But the idea is again to find a sequence. 01:34:27.000 --> 01:34:40.000 And we're going to pretend that this sequence is 300 base pairs long. Okay. And the first question that you need to ask yourself is what's the background on which I'm doing this. 01:34:40.000 --> 01:34:52.000 There are two different kinds of backgrounds to think about a pure zero and real world. 01:34:52.000 --> 01:35:00.000 And what do I mean by that? Well, a pure zero background is when you use laboratory conditions and distilled water. 01:35:00.000 --> 01:35:11.000 And then you put a DNA of interest that matches this sequence into your control. And then you use the primers that you've selected. 01:35:12.000 --> 01:35:32.000 And you amplify the DNA that the primers are specific for. And you show that you get this nice little curve at let's say 15 to 20 cycles where the reaction goes exponential. And it's when the action of the amount of molecules goes exponential. 01:35:33.000 --> 01:35:43.000 That's being produced as you cycle the PCR exam. This threshold where it goes where it goes exponential is what they call the cycle count. 01:35:43.000 --> 01:36:00.000 And this number is used by quantitative PCR to indicate a relative quantity of RNA. So if I explain that in more detail, I would like to refer to a study that I did actually as a graduate student. 01:36:00.000 --> 01:36:14.000 Where I was taking samples out of the brain of mice. And I was trying to prove that acetylcholine receptors were present in these samples that I would take out of the brain. 01:36:15.000 --> 01:36:36.000 And so the way that we did this was use quantitative PCR. Quantitative PCR again is using a PCR reaction that has a fluorescent indicator which can be used to define the cycle at which the exponential sigmoid curve shows up. 01:36:36.000 --> 01:36:47.000 And so this can be used to indicate a relative abundance. If you had a second transcript here that showed up at let's say a cycle count of 28. 01:36:47.000 --> 01:37:04.000 Then if both of these proteins were known to be present in my neurons for example, then we might say that the protein that was found here was more abundant in the neuron that I was recording from than the protein that I found here. 01:37:04.000 --> 01:37:13.000 And so I might make a statement for example that let's say give you a hint of what let's say we have two groups of mice. 01:37:13.000 --> 01:37:22.000 We have mice that we gave nicotine and so they had a little nicotine. And then we had mice that they were controlled. They had no nicotine. 01:37:22.000 --> 01:37:39.000 And then when we measured the difference between these two groups we found that in the mouse that were given nicotine they had acetylcholine receptors that showed up at count 50. 01:37:39.000 --> 01:37:47.000 But the control mice showed up at a count of 28. Now you might think wow that's a really cool finding but that finding doesn't mean shit. 01:37:47.000 --> 01:37:54.000 Until I'm able to frame this cycle count in a reference. 01:37:54.000 --> 01:38:06.000 So I would need to build a reference of RNA or DNA transcripts that provide a baseline CT. 01:38:06.000 --> 01:38:29.000 In other words if we know for example that there are also supposed to be NMDA receptors in these neurons and we did a measurement of let's say 100 neurons in the brain region that I'm interested in and we found that on average the cycle count for NMDA receptors was 20. 01:38:29.000 --> 01:38:47.000 Now if we took that and use this as a reference point we might be able to make some statement because we already know that from 100 neurons there's an indicator called an NMDA channel which will regularly show up at the 20 range. 01:38:47.000 --> 01:39:05.000 And so now I can make a statement about the relative abundance change if in this experiment and this experiment the cycle count of the NMDA control was the same. 01:39:05.000 --> 01:39:28.000 On the other hand if in this measurement the NMDA count was let's say 28 and in this measurement the NMDA count was 20 then actually this difference would be zero because when compared to the cycle count of the control marker these two are not different. 01:39:28.000 --> 01:39:48.000 And one of the most important things to understand is that there was no such control marker in any PCR test ever used to demonstrate that the RNA that they said was in your body at a certain cycle count compared to one that they knew the expected value of. 01:39:49.000 --> 01:40:11.000 So in other words if you didn't know that 20% of the people in the world would be positive for SARS-CoV-2 all the time but then they told you that 20% of the people in the world are positives for COVID and that means it's a spread you are not being told an accurate piece of data. 01:40:11.000 --> 01:40:19.000 Just like if somebody says the cycle count is different between these two patients one had cycle count of 28 and one had a cycle count of 20. 01:40:19.000 --> 01:40:25.000 What are you using to tell me that the signal in one person is the same as the signal in the other person? 01:40:25.000 --> 01:40:39.000 Where is your NMDA control? Where is your RNA control? What control marker are you using in any of these people so that I can compare across these patients? 01:40:39.000 --> 01:40:45.000 It wasn't done ever. Never ever ever ever ever. 01:40:45.000 --> 01:41:07.000 This is still in the pure side right? We're not talking about the real world where again the background remains uncharacterized. 01:41:07.000 --> 01:41:17.000 I'm not very good writer when I'm teaching. I can only write when I'm listening. If I write when I'm teaching it looks like this this is more like how I would be on a chalkboard or a whiteboard. 01:41:17.000 --> 01:41:25.000 I can still win but it's harder. I don't write as well when I'm also thinking so I apologize for this shitty writing chicken scratch. 01:41:25.000 --> 01:41:31.000 But I hope I'm showing you something that you actually have never been shown by anyone before. 01:41:31.000 --> 01:41:39.000 The really crazy thing is I bet if you go back to some of these people's substacks that were telling you about PCR years ago none of them would have said this. 01:41:39.000 --> 01:41:51.000 Now what if I was to double the amount of bullshit that they didn't tell you in one single line? 01:41:51.000 --> 01:41:54.000 Actually it's two lines. 01:41:54.000 --> 01:42:05.000 So there was a way that all academic biologists including myself have known to make a PCR much more specific and the way to do it would be to use nested primers. 01:42:05.000 --> 01:42:13.000 So the first round of PCR gets you here and you only get here when the second primers work. 01:42:13.000 --> 01:42:28.000 So that means basically you're going to amplify a amplicon and then you're going to take that amplicon and you're going to run it against a second pair of primers that if they're not specific for that amplicon as well then the amplicon won't get amplified and you won't get a positive result. 01:42:29.000 --> 01:42:45.000 And in academic biology on almost every bench in America and around the world when they use quantitative PCR to try and make a comparison between multiple mRNA transcripts not only do they need to have several control markers that they can use to generalize across 01:42:46.000 --> 01:43:03.000 animals and experiments but they would always use nested primers to be sure that false positives were not considered amplification and you would actually have to show those nested primers in part of your materials and methods so that other people could check them against the sequence. 01:43:03.000 --> 01:43:14.000 And so if you don't have a control marker to scale the experimental marker that you purport to be finding you can't make a statement about abundance. 01:43:14.000 --> 01:43:20.000 If you don't have nested primers you can't make a statement about specificity really. 01:43:20.000 --> 01:43:42.000 And now if you knew that in America they only ever used one amplicon and it depended on which product EUA product you were using what amplicon they used and who selected it and that they never used nested primers and that there was no control marker for a human gene for you to scale the amplification cycle. 01:43:43.000 --> 01:43:46.000 Nothing, nothing zero, nothing they have no idea. 01:43:46.000 --> 01:43:57.000 In fact Jessica Hockett as a very good point it would have been very easy almost trivial for them to have put the DNA material on the swabs they wanted to test positive. 01:43:57.000 --> 01:44:11.000 And since there are no controls, positive controls or negative controls and there are no nested primers then there's absolutely no reason nothing to stop them from just having put some DNA on these swabs and then said they found it. 01:44:12.000 --> 01:44:20.000 That's pretty simple. I mean that's as easy as the that's as easy as pie for for DITRA. 01:44:20.000 --> 01:44:28.000 Or for the State Department if they were responsible for distributing some of these things overseas. 01:44:28.000 --> 01:44:45.000 It's going to take me a couple more swings at this this issue and it's going to take me a little bit more work for me to make the pictures that I want to use on this first flashcard of Jeff and I but I do think that we can get there so that on the front. 01:44:45.000 --> 01:44:50.000 It can be the text or the the simple explanation of how you got bamboozled. 01:44:51.000 --> 01:45:05.000 And then on the back we could have this more you know step by step explanation for what was missing why academic biologists should be like wait what they didn't use those wait what they didn't do that wait what no nested primers you got to be kidding me. 01:45:05.000 --> 01:45:19.000 I think there is a possibility that something like a flashcard with this kind of detail could actually wake some people up not the people that aren't going to wake up not the people that think Ed Young is a his a great writer and deserve the Pulitzer prize. 01:45:19.000 --> 01:45:32.000 But we could get closer to a threshold of academic biologists that understand the breadth and the depth of how much they lied to us and and maybe that's the way out. 01:45:32.000 --> 01:45:42.000 Ladies and gentlemen giga ohm biological will state one more time that intramuscular injection of any combination of substances with the intent of augmenting the immune system is done. 01:45:43.000 --> 01:45:50.000 And if you have any feedback on my cartoon drawing of PCR please send it to me in an email I want to get this right. 01:45:50.000 --> 01:46:08.000 I want to make sure that the progress we are making is not set backwards so stay focused on the biology love your neighbor and don't take their bait on social media regardless of what they say. 01:46:08.000 --> 01:46:10.000 Thank you guys for being here and I will see you tomorrow. 01:46:10.000 --> 01:46:27.000 Don't forget follow Mark Koolak Mark Utisotonic live and don't forget to share Nick Hudson and and Jonathan Engler and Jessica Hockett and all of these other people that are fighting to get the truth out which is that they murdered people and they told us it was a pandemic 01:46:27.000 --> 01:46:37.000 and now they're lying to us about transfection and transformation and a spike protein and and we got to save our kids ladies and gentlemen I love you very much see you tomorrow. 01:47:27.000 --> 01:47:33.000 See you guys tomorrow love you all very much.