WEBVTT 00:58.946 --> 01:00.988 Thanks for watching! 01:21.019 --> 01:23.601 Neptune, eighth planet from the sun. 01:24.162 --> 01:25.043 A mystery now. 01:25.463 --> 01:28.606 We hope to have close-up photos from Voyager 2 in 1989. 01:29.066 --> 01:32.249 We do have them! 01:32.369 --> 01:33.670 They're my home screen. 01:34.030 --> 01:38.414 Miss Hoover, once again, the lesson plan I prepared would have covered this topic much better. 01:38.734 --> 01:44.039 But I can see... Miss Hoover? 01:44.920 --> 01:45.961 It's Tuesday, Lisa. 01:46.241 --> 01:47.362 Taco Tuesday. 01:47.382 --> 01:47.422 Oh! 02:07.583 --> 02:10.224 Run into the tunnel. 02:11.645 --> 02:14.887 You have to go as fast as you can. 02:17.629 --> 02:19.190 You can trust me. 02:19.210 --> 02:22.532 It's real. 02:22.713 --> 02:23.353 It's real. 02:26.297 --> 02:31.040 But you can tell if someone's lying, you know, you can sort of feel it in people. 02:49.500 --> 02:50.220 And I have lied. 02:50.240 --> 02:51.281 I'm sure I'll lie again. 02:51.301 --> 02:52.222 I don't want to lie. 02:52.722 --> 02:54.063 You know, I don't think I'm a liar. 02:54.163 --> 02:55.203 I try not to be a liar. 02:55.223 --> 02:56.084 I don't want to be a liar. 02:56.644 --> 02:59.406 I think it's like really important not to be a liar. 03:01.667 --> 03:06.830 Specialization should make you suspicious, because it's gotten harder to evaluate what's going on. 03:07.310 --> 03:10.392 And it's presumably gotten easier for people to lie and to exaggerate. 03:10.832 --> 03:12.793 And then one should be a little bit suspicious. 03:12.813 --> 03:15.935 And that's, that's, that's sort of my starting my starting bias. 03:23.307 --> 03:24.653 Ha ha. 08:34.312 --> 08:34.993 Testing 1, 2. 08:35.554 --> 08:36.315 Test 1, 2. 08:37.176 --> 08:37.857 Test 1, 2. 08:38.017 --> 08:40.942 Trying to figure out how to get this. 08:41.122 --> 08:42.644 Why is that not working there? 08:44.827 --> 08:45.648 Hey, there we go. 08:47.398 --> 08:48.760 Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. 08:48.900 --> 08:49.560 Welcome to the show. 08:49.600 --> 08:51.062 This is GigaOM Biological. 08:51.102 --> 08:57.689 A high-resistance, low-noise information brief brought to you by a biologist trying to bring you a little hope in this dark world. 08:57.709 --> 09:03.775 A little hope about the fact that nobody's going to be able to avoid us in the near future. 09:03.896 --> 09:06.618 Everyone's going to hear this message in one form or another. 09:07.339 --> 09:10.441 The question is, will they hear it clear enough for it to ring a bell? 09:10.941 --> 09:14.883 Will they hear it clear enough for them to see that biology is the way? 09:15.924 --> 09:21.567 Not to want to sound too militant about it, but we need to start teaching our kids right now. 09:22.167 --> 09:25.629 We need to start getting our kids off of social media right now. 09:25.909 --> 09:28.171 We need to start getting our kids to see 09:29.011 --> 09:31.875 social media for what it is right now. 09:32.495 --> 09:46.192 Even if they're still on it, they need to understand how much is in their hands in terms of the responsibility to curate who they follow and who they listen to, who they read, because you only have about 35,000 thoughts 09:50.148 --> 09:54.412 You only have about 35,000 thoughts that can go through your mind every day. 09:54.792 --> 10:11.406 And if you think of those 35,000 thoughts as a garden that you're curating, and it's kind of like a juggling act, and over the course of the day, you're responsible for taking care of what thoughts go through your head and how long they spend any reasonable amount of time there. 10:12.603 --> 10:20.988 And without active curation, and instead with a lot of scrolling, your children... Your children are going to become enslaved. 10:21.048 --> 10:27.571 They're gonna inherit a system much in the same way that we've inherited this system from our parents. 10:29.072 --> 10:34.775 It is remarkable... Why is that... What the heck? 10:36.977 --> 10:41.019 For some reason... Oh, I didn't turn either of these on. 10:42.056 --> 10:50.280 You know, see, again, it's one of those things where if you don't have, if you don't have someone to play along, let me see if this works. 10:52.581 --> 10:53.742 Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. 10:53.782 --> 10:54.662 Welcome to the show. 10:54.742 --> 10:55.563 Boy, oh boy. 10:55.583 --> 10:58.164 I don't know what's up with that lighting. 10:59.653 --> 11:04.336 Maybe I just have coffee all over my teeth. 11:04.396 --> 11:05.656 That could be the problem. 11:05.816 --> 11:10.819 I'm just gonna, I'm just gonna blow all the, blow all the illusion out of the water here. 11:10.839 --> 11:16.723 And just let you see how the, how the, how the donuts are made here. 11:17.163 --> 11:20.845 Let me just, or do they say sausage now? 11:20.885 --> 11:22.426 Do the kids say sausage or donuts? 11:22.446 --> 11:24.267 How the donuts are made is how I'm gonna say it. 11:25.202 --> 11:26.163 Cut over here. 11:26.283 --> 11:28.885 That should have been the writing thing. 11:28.945 --> 11:30.707 So I got to turn that on too. 11:31.267 --> 11:32.128 Good morning, everybody. 11:32.168 --> 11:33.309 It's Taco Tuesday. 11:33.389 --> 11:35.851 It's 15th of April, 2025. 11:37.052 --> 11:43.718 You are here at the Gigaohm Biological High Resistance Low Noise Information Brief coming to you live from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 11:45.119 --> 11:46.861 I don't have a crew of any kind. 11:46.921 --> 11:50.184 And so occasionally some of the cameras aren't on. 11:50.244 --> 11:51.545 Some of them are out of focus. 11:51.605 --> 11:52.646 These wires are under my... 11:53.366 --> 11:58.368 chair And the desk is low or my seat is high. 11:58.448 --> 12:02.389 I guess it can be either of those two things That's a coffee cup. 12:02.970 --> 12:05.891 That is just Zev Zelenko. 12:05.951 --> 12:10.332 I'm just trying to see if there's any Incriminating evidence on camera. 12:10.412 --> 12:10.993 No, there's not. 12:11.033 --> 12:12.853 Thank you very much for joining me this morning. 12:12.893 --> 12:19.856 Ladies and gentlemen It is wonderful to be here this morning Taco Tuesday is an interesting experiment that is ongoing where 12:20.656 --> 12:35.982 I come to you live with a cup of coffee and a large bottle of water in some kind of preparatory act for the rest of the week where I'm going to attempt to put out a journal club and a biology 101, a new biology 101 each week. 12:36.542 --> 12:41.884 Those are a lot of work, especially now that people are throwing things at me from all directions. 12:43.304 --> 12:47.626 It is remarkable the effect that first substack about new biology 101 has had. 12:48.846 --> 13:07.998 both from the perspective of people who decided that the contents of it were irrelevant and instead my sub-high school level ability to write and to spellcheck is apparently so appalling that almost no communication at all really occurs because my writing is so bad. 13:09.219 --> 13:14.143 Irrespective of that, I really appreciate the positive feedback that I've gotten as well. 13:14.523 --> 13:22.009 If you want to look at this work that's been done over the last year and a half or so, you can go to stream.gigaohm.bio.com. 13:22.029 --> 13:31.097 You can find all of that stuff archived on our own website that we are actually paying for in collaboration now with my friend Mark Kulak from Boston. 13:32.018 --> 13:32.818 He puts in like 13:33.599 --> 13:39.303 Really, the reality of it is like a third of the total costs of me maintaining PeerTube and Soapbox. 13:39.403 --> 13:45.627 And so, yes, he's putting his videos up there, but yes, he's also really helping substantially. 13:45.647 --> 13:51.892 We're actually trying to make some changes to the way that that website works so that the costs are going to go down quite significantly. 13:51.932 --> 13:53.433 I hope that's going to help me a little bit. 13:54.253 --> 13:59.939 But as you can hear from the numbers, running a website like that is like $300 a month. 14:00.279 --> 14:01.820 It's not really that big of a deal. 14:01.860 --> 14:06.665 If you've got somebody with the know-how to help you set it up, then it's kind of trivial, actually. 14:07.225 --> 14:12.110 And there's no excuse for anybody with a podcast or some kind of... 14:14.512 --> 14:23.138 let's say, significant following, there's really no excuse for them not to be building an infrastructure that is essentially independent of mainstream media. 14:23.178 --> 14:33.925 That would be really, in my mind, one of the primary signals that somebody is really willing and able and trying to get something out there and has a real message. 14:33.985 --> 14:42.871 If they're either, one, plastering it all over the place, or they have spontaneously inspired other people to plaster it all over the place, or if 14:44.652 --> 15:09.383 Some way or another they're trying to wholly establish something outside of of mainstream media by hosting something themselves preferably for free That that's really I think a sign of something good and I don't see very many signs of that around the universe So anyway streamed out giga or giga ohm bio there is a soapbox where we do a lot of communicating and a lot of people 15:11.334 --> 15:14.616 talk very harshly to one another, but it's a good place to hash things out. 15:15.417 --> 15:21.601 And if you want to be on the mailing list, I'm not sure that Fearless sent a mail out today because she wasn't sure I was going to go on stream. 15:22.502 --> 15:26.905 Since writing of that Biology 101, there's been a lot of phone calls and emails in the background. 15:27.742 --> 15:56.941 unlike any other period in in recent memory and so it's uh we're moving forward with a little caution and a little um a little more preparation than normal maybe let's say it like that so let me see if this works oh no i'm sure it won't work because i haven't done this yet um i'm gonna cut in a second over to the desk oh really now that's strange what 15:58.263 --> 16:12.657 really okay i'm not even going to worry about that right now let's see if we can do this one we got some minor minor technical glitches here i apologize again there we go this is a um 16:16.195 --> 16:31.312 This is a one-man show, and so I got a lot of little tricks up my sleeve, but these tricks require some pretty Craigslist-style technology that's all got to communicate, and when NVIDIA drops a new driver, guess what screws up everything? 16:35.310 --> 16:38.913 So I've been down here today trying to get the setup to work, but it is working. 16:38.993 --> 16:41.355 It's just one little thing out there that's not out there. 16:41.395 --> 16:44.437 So it's again, let me see if this trick works. 16:45.178 --> 16:46.059 This should work. 16:46.939 --> 16:47.099 Yes. 16:50.273 --> 16:54.437 Taco Tuesday is not for everyone, but it is for anyone who likes tacos. 16:54.477 --> 16:55.919 And by tacos, I mean truth. 16:56.359 --> 16:57.200 Truth Tuesday. 16:58.101 --> 16:59.802 And the truth is different kinds of meat. 17:00.263 --> 17:04.347 It's different kinds of concoctions, which, you know, if they're made authentically, taste very good. 17:04.847 --> 17:09.192 And I am not Mexican, but I do very, very much love tacos. 17:09.692 --> 17:12.915 Actually, like my friend Greg Glassman really likes tacos. 17:14.016 --> 17:22.203 I am seeking the truth, and this is the plural version of let's start with the truth, or let's begin with the truth. 17:23.584 --> 17:32.151 As far as the Latin teacher at Bethel Park Community School System tells me that is, and she is a genius. 17:32.231 --> 17:33.392 So I'm going with that one. 17:34.413 --> 17:39.997 I don't necessarily want to pronounce it out loud, but this is our new background theme here. 17:40.515 --> 17:42.156 We are really trying to seek the truth. 17:42.376 --> 17:47.158 Taco Tuesday is really about the truth, because this is about the grandchildren of Earth. 17:47.218 --> 17:52.140 And I'm trying to start to get people on both sides of the equation, so to speak. 17:52.180 --> 17:56.101 Both sides is what is already slave speak. 17:56.182 --> 18:03.945 I'm already speaking in the language that people who watch television or use social media skillfully are using with each other. 18:04.725 --> 18:06.046 when I say both sides. 18:07.826 --> 18:25.074 And we have been purposefully divided into what can be generalized as two sides, but those two sides overlap in a very contradictory way, so that those two sides, if they were well understood, would be contradictory holes. 18:26.575 --> 18:29.736 And yet, that's part of the magic of social media. 18:29.756 --> 18:31.277 And it's part of the 18:32.648 --> 18:43.836 the sort of magnificence of the position that human people, that the people of earth are in right now, the children of earth are in right now. 18:43.896 --> 18:53.523 The situation that the children of earth are in right now is one that I have never, only recently come to understand. 18:54.704 --> 18:55.545 It's remarkable. 18:55.965 --> 18:59.748 And the only way that people in my own family 19:00.649 --> 19:27.390 in the Netherlands and in America, in my own social circle, in the Netherlands and in America could be so separated in their understanding of reality is because of skilled social media use and engagement with that 35,000 thoughts a day and allowing social media to put a significant, determine what a significant number of those thoughts are. 19:27.510 --> 19:28.090 So many, 19:29.011 --> 19:49.505 that a lot of the consequences of acquiescing to those thoughts, being occupied by those ideas, is that you are unable to devote enough of your remaining ideas per day to something useful, which will accumulate into something useful for you, for your family, for your community. 19:50.525 --> 19:58.371 And that is such a remarkable effect where, like any other real military exercise, you wouldn't want to kill everybody. 19:59.616 --> 20:01.557 You just want to incapacitate them. 20:04.079 --> 20:11.383 And social media has incapacitated skilled users to an extent to which I never imagined possible. 20:12.406 --> 20:31.063 And I think that's what was happening when I lost my mind, so to speak, at the University of Pittsburgh and I was trying to go from lab to lab to try and find somebody who agreed with me that this wasn't all just a cut and dried, you know, understanding that there was just an inevitability coming over the horizon from China. 20:34.366 --> 20:37.169 Certainly I thought I could find somebody that would understand that 20:38.740 --> 20:55.218 What we have been using, the methodologies that we have been using are not appropriate to be called a countermeasure or an investigational vaccine when we already have names for them and we already understand the limits of their use in mice and monkeys. 20:56.800 --> 20:58.702 And yet the same thing happened. 21:00.848 --> 21:28.747 And it's because of skilled social media use, skilled engagement that these people were unable, but it's also the twisted way that academics, the twisted ladder that academics climb result in their positioning themselves to be intellectually impotent in all places except their tiny little expertise. 21:29.958 --> 21:43.234 If you were a carpenter, you would need to be an expert in a one particular kind of dovetail joint made in one particular kind of cabinet, in one particular kind of house, in one region of America. 21:43.735 --> 21:49.462 That's how you would get tenure as a carpenter in an American university. 21:50.540 --> 21:57.547 Think about that, and you would never be able to tell anybody anything about how their joints are less strong than your joint. 21:57.587 --> 22:04.553 You would just have to make the argument that if every joint was a dovetail joint, the consequences of this would be tremendous. 22:05.134 --> 22:08.998 And maybe we would be able to understand why some of these IKEA cabinets tip over. 22:10.777 --> 22:16.340 Certainly it contributes to IKEA cabinets tipping over and so that's why I work on dovetail joints. 22:16.820 --> 22:23.604 That's how malevolent the position that we are in is because we have been put here on purpose. 22:23.664 --> 22:26.326 We have been made to feel confused. 22:26.386 --> 22:35.251 We have been made to feel powerless and even the people in academia essentially are victims of this same system where 22:36.334 --> 22:42.359 Their salary depends on them becoming hypnotized by it or acquiescing to it. 22:42.399 --> 22:44.641 I keep using the same word, but I don't have a better one. 22:48.376 --> 22:53.440 And that's what this fake anti-vaccine movement in America is, why it's so dangerous. 22:53.500 --> 22:58.803 Because they are there to misrepresent a position which is actually valid. 22:59.244 --> 23:06.489 So that both sides of the... Both sides, in slave speak again, are unable to find the exit. 23:08.345 --> 23:24.894 And once the left sees that the right is being played, they might be able to have some talking points, but it will also require them to understand that they have indeed been exactly as bamboozled as a lot of these Trump voters have tried to tell them they are. 23:26.095 --> 23:36.361 That this nonsense about a gender spectrum or not a gender spectrum is also a trap and both the right and the left need to understand that. 23:38.151 --> 23:45.453 because it's all about trying to subconsciously reinforce this bad biology where evolution because DNA. 23:47.273 --> 23:47.614 That's it. 23:50.614 --> 24:07.259 And that's the reason why nobody on the right or the left is able to so succinctly say that the effect that we saw and were shown on television that we're told was a novel virus called SARS-CoV-2 that caused a series of symptoms called COVID 24:08.297 --> 24:09.218 was a lie. 24:10.239 --> 24:14.243 They took advantage of an anticipated rise in all-cause mortality. 24:14.263 --> 24:14.743 How's that? 24:15.524 --> 24:16.785 Why don't you make a meme of that? 24:17.306 --> 24:20.349 An anticipated rise in all-cause mortality. 24:22.003 --> 24:23.946 and sculpted it with a little murder and lies. 24:24.006 --> 24:33.077 Some of those murders and lies go around the use of pure oxygen, both with masks and also with ventilation. 24:33.518 --> 24:37.923 It goes with PCR not being a useful diagnostic tool then or now. 24:39.008 --> 24:45.834 Although it is being used to find measles now, it couldn't be used to find measles when Wakefield was using it. 24:46.274 --> 24:49.997 And Wakefield was, you know, using it right all along, right? 24:50.037 --> 24:52.319 And so now we're supposed to be arguing about that? 24:54.421 --> 24:55.842 It's not by accident. 24:56.002 --> 24:58.164 Nobody is in this narrative by chance. 24:58.244 --> 25:05.010 That is the hardest truth that a lot of people who use skill, skillfully use social media will have to accept. 25:06.667 --> 25:20.710 And of course, perhaps the largest elephant in the room is that not using antibiotics for pneumonia or for sepsis or for urinary tract infection is a crime. 25:22.090 --> 25:35.093 And there were people on the internet saying that for a viral syndrome, antibiotics are not appropriate and using antibiotics when they're not needed is dangerous because you can create antibiotic resistant bacteria. 25:36.533 --> 25:47.800 this is an exact narrative that you may have forgotten just like you forgot about 15 days or 14 days or two weeks to stop the spread or two weeks to flatten the curve? 25:49.461 --> 25:53.344 Have you already forgotten that they actually said that for like two weeks straight? 25:55.125 --> 25:56.586 Five and a half years ago? 25:58.187 --> 26:00.468 Five and a half years ago. 26:04.167 --> 26:10.011 So you've got to keep the memory of 2020 alive, the memory of 2021 alive. 26:10.031 --> 26:11.572 You've got to work to archive it. 26:12.293 --> 26:18.137 And any of your heroes, you need to double check, triple check and triple archive everything they said. 26:18.697 --> 26:28.044 And if it lines up with somebody who's learning and figuring things out and ultimately fighting against something that makes sense, then fine, follow them. 26:28.104 --> 26:29.925 But if it's not, you've got to be honest. 26:32.540 --> 26:33.961 and you've got to do something about it. 26:37.724 --> 26:50.916 Because the whole tariff thing and the way that all of these podcasts are focused on it and the way that all of these people are suddenly experts in it because it's just common sense, the way these things work, it is a divided narrative. 26:51.761 --> 26:57.983 I'm not an economist, I'm a biologist and I can still see that it's a contradictory narrative. 26:58.764 --> 27:05.526 If you say that tariffs are a way to protect American jobs and American manufacturing, then they are permanent. 27:06.947 --> 27:15.090 If you talk like it's a deal-making opportunity and it's something that can be negotiated, then you don't believe in the first idea. 27:16.698 --> 27:24.341 If you believe that tariffs are a great thing and they protect American jobs and manufacturing and American interests, then they should be permanent. 27:28.223 --> 27:32.604 And yet he's talking at the same, out the same side of his mouth as if, no, it's the art of the deal. 27:32.664 --> 27:33.665 I was just bullshitting. 27:33.725 --> 27:34.585 I was just bluffing. 27:35.125 --> 27:41.768 So you lied about the ideal of it in order to make a deal with it. 27:44.192 --> 27:46.073 And then everybody's arguing about it now. 27:46.133 --> 27:54.437 It's almost similar to like the argument about a lab leak or a natural virus or whether it's a cover-up or not. 27:55.337 --> 27:58.919 Or whether the diffuse proposal supports one side. 27:59.159 --> 28:00.700 You know, it's weird, right? 28:00.760 --> 28:05.122 Because again, all they have to do is get these people on the internet to go with it. 28:06.260 --> 28:13.746 And now no matter where you go with your scroll, it just seems there's this illusion of consensus that the tariffs are something really important. 28:14.286 --> 28:16.568 And wow, he's really tanked the economy. 28:16.608 --> 28:20.171 And now the dollar is going down and gold is going up and Bitcoin. 28:20.231 --> 28:31.980 And this is all an elaborate theater, which gets this running the clock out on this obvious murder and lies. 28:32.060 --> 28:35.283 Running the clock out on the obvious murder and lies. 28:39.079 --> 28:52.283 And so it's a hard message, but if you see the light at the end of the tunnel, you see that if you start with the truth, then there's a lot of fear that's gone. 28:52.323 --> 28:54.164 There's a lot of uncertainty that's gone. 28:56.384 --> 29:04.147 And instead, these people start to identify themselves by the way that they stick to the narrative, the way that they keep pushing this thing up the hill. 29:05.191 --> 29:15.978 even though it's been debunked and written off and all of the lies and the stories and the exaggeration are supposedly exposed, nobody's still at the truth. 29:17.098 --> 29:26.784 Nobody's still gotten to the point where they can say transfection in healthy people is a crime because these people have agreed not to use the word. 29:28.165 --> 29:32.308 Nobody has gotten to RNA cannot pandemic because people have agreed 29:33.615 --> 29:37.160 to stick to the narrative that there was a novel virus, something very strange. 29:37.220 --> 29:38.882 I know I had something strange, right? 29:38.922 --> 29:42.227 I had it three times, say some of these people. 29:43.568 --> 29:46.973 Intramuscular injection is dumb as something that Brandy Vaughn 29:47.748 --> 29:54.252 would have loved to put on a billboard that all of these people have met. 29:55.173 --> 29:58.455 Ingestion versus injection was the way that Brandy Vaughn said it. 29:58.675 --> 30:13.986 And yet, despite this magically wonderful way to teach people the biology, and despite the fact that all of these people know exactly who you'd be talking about if you mentioned Brandy Vaughn and that idea, 30:14.766 --> 30:21.251 None of these people have decided to adopt these words to help save children. 30:22.772 --> 30:31.638 They believe that they are fighting against an apocalyptic moment in human history because children are being killed, I guess. 30:34.500 --> 30:42.706 But, you know, the most drastic thing they're gonna do is move to the United States and buy a ranch in Austin and be in a couple movies. 30:43.675 --> 30:54.941 and put themselves on billboards in a bra and fight for better jobs for autistic kids for 10 years before they come to America and start all over. 30:57.763 --> 31:07.188 And even if in a year they say the old vaccine schedule's bad, they're still not actually gonna say that intramuscular injection is dumb. 31:07.808 --> 31:08.929 I can guarantee it. 31:10.353 --> 31:14.574 And that's how you will know they are frauds because this biology is real. 31:15.975 --> 31:18.195 And that's why no one will talk about it. 31:18.255 --> 31:20.216 No one's gonna ridicule this. 31:20.256 --> 31:28.818 You're never gonna hear Kevin McKernan go on a podcast and say that, you know, I heard somewhere on the internet that people were saying that intramuscular injection is dumb. 31:29.219 --> 31:37.161 Well, here's a whole list of situations where intramuscular injection is the best way to administer a medical product. 31:38.689 --> 31:40.269 Robert Malone's not going to do it either. 31:41.630 --> 31:47.051 Robert F. Kennedy's not going to do it either, even though by September, he's going to tell you the cause of autism. 31:47.531 --> 31:49.851 That's not enough time to finish any science. 31:50.091 --> 31:51.572 So they already knew the answer. 31:55.472 --> 32:03.354 These people are playing an extremely malevolent game for people that I often generalize as calling the slavers. 32:03.414 --> 32:04.194 I don't know who they are. 32:05.435 --> 32:07.235 They work for weaponized piles of money. 32:07.295 --> 32:09.096 They own weaponized piles of money. 32:09.156 --> 32:10.896 They manage weaponized piles of money. 32:10.916 --> 32:15.817 I don't know what the right words are to use, but we are being dominated. 32:17.837 --> 32:32.920 Our consciousness is being occupied by the military programs called social media and the thoughts that they put in our head that are not these, these truths, the truth that the, 32:34.841 --> 32:37.343 vaccine schedule in America is a criminal enterprise. 32:39.364 --> 32:42.066 I mean, we've been saying this for two and a half years now. 32:42.586 --> 32:50.891 Brandy Vaughn was saying it for a couple of years before the pandemic on stage with these people and they didn't adopt the language. 32:51.111 --> 32:53.033 They didn't hat tip to Brandy for this. 32:53.073 --> 32:55.014 You know, this is a real best way to understand it. 32:55.694 --> 32:59.717 You know, that's how you see that Susan Humphreys is a fraud. 33:01.263 --> 33:03.505 She still can't say it succinctly. 33:03.565 --> 33:04.766 She's written books. 33:05.446 --> 33:06.967 She's been on movies. 33:07.187 --> 33:08.588 She's been in movies. 33:08.788 --> 33:10.109 And she is a doctor. 33:10.570 --> 33:14.212 And she's still not convinced that intramuscular injection is dumb. 33:14.693 --> 33:19.196 She thinks it's a combination of things that include antibiotics, which may be true. 33:22.398 --> 33:24.340 But it is not being honest. 33:25.424 --> 33:40.533 when you say it's genetics and food and toxins in the environment, when you know that any exposure to a toxin on the outside of our body or on a spoon is not the same as injecting it intramuscularly. 33:42.874 --> 33:49.298 And as a doctor, she should know that if these vaccines were okay for you, then they could also inject them in the blood. 33:51.039 --> 33:53.340 That's where the immune cells are anyway, right? 33:54.397 --> 33:56.358 But they don't inject them in the blood. 33:56.398 --> 34:07.421 They inject them in the muscles so that the administration of these combinations of toxins is least likely to be temporarily connected to whatever bad things happen. 34:07.461 --> 34:13.222 And those bad things can be smeared across a much, much longer timescale. 34:18.224 --> 34:20.484 This is the worst kind of malevolence. 34:20.544 --> 34:22.425 It's very hard to believe that our parents 34:24.275 --> 34:27.921 bequeathed us this system, gave us this system, whatever the right word is. 34:27.961 --> 34:35.153 They passed it down to us without even knowing it because when I was a child, I'm 53 years old, when I was a child, there were a couple shots. 34:36.425 --> 34:38.546 And if I'm damaged by them, I'm damaged by them. 34:38.567 --> 34:43.610 But there were a couple shots and they were given much later than this schedule that the kids are on right now. 34:44.150 --> 35:00.502 And if Polly Tommy already 10 years ago thought that this was an apocalyptic war or a once in a lifetime, super bad thing, the children were being injured. 35:00.882 --> 35:02.984 She didn't fight very hard to say it. 35:04.409 --> 35:26.378 Even after she heard Brandy Vaughn, who doesn't have a damaged child, say it because she felt so guilty about having an undamaged, unvaccinated child, felt so blessed to have an undamaged, unvaccinated, undamaged child, that she made it her life's work and dedicated her life savings to trying to get the message out. 35:30.168 --> 35:36.570 And it is remarkable how much she was able to accomplish in her short time of being awake. 35:38.210 --> 35:46.172 And it is remarkable how little these people were able to take on this fake anti-vaccine movement that still can't say the U.S. 35:46.212 --> 35:48.393 vaccine schedule is a criminal enterprise. 35:48.873 --> 35:57.775 We have at the Health and Human Services Secretary position a lawyer who hired me for a year and a half. 35:59.380 --> 36:04.529 who has heard my arguments about what clones are and what they are not. 36:04.770 --> 36:10.099 My arguments about what virology is and what it isn't and why no virus is an illusion. 36:12.003 --> 36:12.604 It's a trap. 36:15.230 --> 36:29.943 that made no logical progress for five years, even if they suddenly make logical progress now, there's no way to explain how Tom Cowan has a book in 2018 with Chelsea Green that doesn't say it then, and then for seven years of the pandemic, he didn't say it yet. 36:32.865 --> 36:41.893 2018 until now, think about Tom Cowan's lack of progress in succinctly saying that this is a criminal enterprise. 36:47.213 --> 36:50.237 Think about all of those people who have failed to say that the U.S. 36:50.277 --> 36:57.145 vaccine schedule, when compared to any other schedule on earth, is a criminal enterprise. 36:57.225 --> 36:58.046 Polly could say it. 36:58.086 --> 36:58.907 She's from over there. 37:01.010 --> 37:03.713 Any Dutch person that wanted to figure it out could research it. 37:03.793 --> 37:06.356 Anyone from Norway could figure it out, research it. 37:07.085 --> 37:18.729 And then all of our allies should be going like, oh my gosh, Americans are under attack by their own government or by some weird, traitorous infiltration of their government, because this doesn't make any sense. 37:19.229 --> 37:24.811 Those kids are getting so many more shots than our kids are getting, and yet that's not happening. 37:27.446 --> 37:29.887 Nobody at heart is saying that. 37:30.027 --> 37:32.088 Nobody at Panda is saying that. 37:32.208 --> 37:35.870 Nobody at any of these organizations like Brownstone is saying that. 37:35.910 --> 37:42.894 They're not establishing Brownstone Spain in order to show everybody in Spain how bad it is in America and ask for help. 37:45.976 --> 37:52.319 Nobody like Jikki Leaks is pointing out that, wow, the American vaccine schedule is pretty dubious. 37:53.715 --> 38:11.680 They're not saying it at all because part of the reason why this fake anti-vaccine movement, these fake resistors of the pandemic are out there is to make sure that the US vaccine schedule is not globally revealed to be the criminal enterprise that it is. 38:11.740 --> 38:17.122 That the American public doesn't wake up to the fact that it's not about race, it's about class. 38:18.062 --> 38:23.204 And if you're going to public school and you have to go to public school, chances are you're on the schedule. 38:26.778 --> 38:28.839 And so it's not about white versus black. 38:28.879 --> 38:31.419 It's about the fact that these people lied to us. 38:31.639 --> 38:39.502 These people in the government, these people in this bureaucracy, these people in these international organizations have lied to us together. 38:39.962 --> 38:49.444 And these people at Children's Health Defense like Meryl Nass and Mary Holland have lied to us with those same organizations about their relevance and about their role in this. 38:49.524 --> 38:51.565 When in reality, it's up to us 38:53.339 --> 39:02.882 to realize that it's a lie, up to us to realize that common sense can tell you that this is a lie, that comparing to other vaccine schedules, you can see it's a lie. 39:03.682 --> 39:06.803 Comparing our children to their children, you can see it's a lie. 39:09.044 --> 39:20.187 And if it takes these people who have been in the spotlight and on billboards and in movies another 10 years to be able to say that, they are not on our team. 39:24.770 --> 39:28.372 And so if you learn the biology, you can say it right to their face. 39:28.432 --> 39:29.773 You can tweet it back to them. 39:29.813 --> 39:33.435 You can see them in person and say, hey, what the hell is going on? 39:33.495 --> 39:37.798 Why don't you just say that intramuscular injection is dumb and make a doctor correct you? 39:39.098 --> 39:41.220 Why don't you just put that out there? 39:41.260 --> 39:45.882 Because that's why that phrase is so powerful and why these people are such chicken shits. 39:46.603 --> 39:47.764 Why it's so obvious. 39:48.824 --> 39:53.247 If intramuscular injection isn't dumb, then somebody should have corrected me by now. 39:55.365 --> 40:00.069 Anyone, please shut this guy up already. 40:01.930 --> 40:10.677 Imagine if one of these people, you know, like Brian Hooker had the courage to say that, you know, Jonathan Cooley of GigaOM Biological is a real hothead. 40:12.198 --> 40:13.699 But I really admire his courage. 40:13.739 --> 40:16.942 And he has this phrase, intramuscular injection is dumb. 40:17.002 --> 40:19.584 And I don't think any MD has corrected him on this. 40:19.624 --> 40:20.625 And I think it's weird. 40:22.739 --> 40:33.103 You know, what'd be really cool is that Brian Hooker could just say that, I met this lady named Brandy Vaughn, and she used to challenge people to think about the difference between ingestion and injection. 40:33.623 --> 40:44.208 And there's actually precedents in US law to strike laws and mandates and all these other things, you know, if the foundation of the assumption of the thing is not good. 40:45.348 --> 40:51.691 I mean, you can't mandate something if the foundation of the mandate is dumb, you know, like it doesn't make any sense. 40:53.303 --> 41:10.452 If the foundation of the mandate is that hitting you with a baseball bat in the head before you're age six is good for you, and so all children before the age of six must be hit with a baseball bat, then you could, that law could be struck by a court just on the basis that it's illogical. 41:11.240 --> 41:17.305 It doesn't make the precedence of the law or the presumptions of the law are dumb. 41:17.685 --> 41:18.686 Whatever you want to say it. 41:18.726 --> 41:19.827 I don't know the legal language. 41:19.867 --> 41:20.547 I'm not a lawyer. 41:20.907 --> 41:22.368 But that's absolutely for sure. 41:22.869 --> 41:26.412 And what these people are doing is avoiding saying those things. 41:27.132 --> 41:31.836 Avoiding saying things that would make the vaccine schedule criminal. 41:33.017 --> 41:33.897 Because it's dumb. 41:34.378 --> 41:35.719 Because it doesn't make sense. 41:35.779 --> 41:37.200 Because there's no biological 41:38.965 --> 41:45.627 rationale for intramuscularly injecting a combination of substances with the intent of augmenting the immune system. 41:45.667 --> 41:48.588 There is no biological rationale for that. 41:50.129 --> 41:52.069 That's a grant application. 41:52.129 --> 42:01.153 That's a story that people like Robert Malone and Mark Lander and Kevin McKernan have been telling people for a long time, but that's not real biology. 42:02.253 --> 42:08.035 That's what Peter Thiel was talking about when we say the specialization should make people suspicious. 42:08.971 --> 42:13.316 Because the specialization allows people to exaggerate and to lie. 42:16.939 --> 42:19.742 And encourages people, more importantly, not to call each other out. 42:20.663 --> 42:30.954 And so if Kevin McKernan bullies everybody on everybody's podcast with, I have more credentials than you and I can say more big words in combination than you can, 42:32.864 --> 42:38.347 then if he says there's a virus and he says the PCR tests work, then for five years, people believe it. 42:38.387 --> 42:46.831 And now suddenly that's where we are with him in front of the Senate, telling people there's DNA in something that they knew already a long time ago, they'd never be able to get the DNA out of. 42:47.702 --> 42:50.505 And if you learn the biology, you will be able to understand that. 42:50.545 --> 43:02.635 And the next time you see Kevin McKernan in person, you can say, but in 2020, when you knew what they were gonna make for an investigational vaccine, didn't you already know how they were gonna manufacture it? 43:02.675 --> 43:06.318 Didn't you already know that they wouldn't be able to get the endotoxins out? 43:06.358 --> 43:09.481 Didn't you already know that DNA and RNA would make a triple helix? 43:09.521 --> 43:14.265 Didn't you already know that they couldn't separate the DNA from the RNA because 43:15.226 --> 43:17.787 anion exchange chromatography wasn't going to be used? 43:17.887 --> 43:28.172 I mean, are you are you saying that you just figured this out over the course of the COVID pandemic despite the fact that you've been already selling genetic sequencing tools since you were like 25? 43:33.700 --> 43:45.825 And so I really think it's important because it's for all the marbles that we start actively pursuing, confronting these people with these biological truths that they cannot deny. 43:46.866 --> 43:56.950 Kevin McKernan had to know that anything prepared using standard biologics procedure, the recombinant bacterial, recombinant DNA, 43:57.754 --> 44:00.336 Manufacturing techniques would never be pure. 44:01.036 --> 44:02.277 He knew that from 2020. 44:02.877 --> 44:13.244 And yet for some reason, only now in 2025, after everybody's decided how many they're gonna take and has gotten their fill, does he come out with a limited spectrum of debate? 44:13.264 --> 44:14.405 That's not the truth at all. 44:14.445 --> 44:19.669 Because the truth would be that I knew these would be bad for all this list of reasons. 44:19.709 --> 44:22.871 And then now we're arguing about the list only number nine. 44:24.520 --> 44:29.853 That would be the truth that Kevin McKernan would tell if he was playing for our grandchildren and his. 44:30.014 --> 44:32.039 Oh wait, maybe he doesn't even have grandchildren. 44:34.517 --> 44:41.602 That's why there's a fake anti-vax movement in America that includes Kevin McKernan, former Human Genome Project Research and Development Director. 44:41.642 --> 44:49.127 That's why the fake anti-vax movement stands in front of and co-opted Brian Hooker all like many years ago. 44:49.207 --> 44:52.089 Because in 2013, Brian Hooker was able to say it right. 44:52.189 --> 44:53.610 Autism's a bullshit word. 44:54.191 --> 44:55.712 These people are vaccine injured. 44:55.752 --> 44:59.575 And a lot of times, vaccine injury has huge neurological effects. 45:01.176 --> 45:02.917 Huge gastrointestinal effects. 45:06.621 --> 45:07.762 And so it's not Rain Man. 45:08.623 --> 45:09.924 Where the hell did Rain Man go? 45:11.445 --> 45:20.793 The anti-vaxxers, these people that have been at it since 1999, they are traitors to our grandkids. 45:20.833 --> 45:22.595 They have not made any progress. 45:23.752 --> 45:25.754 Mary Holland hasn't made any progress. 45:25.834 --> 45:33.341 Meryl Nass hasn't made any progress since she spoke out about the old anthrax vaccines in favor of the new anthrax vaccines. 45:33.841 --> 45:47.594 These are fake anti-vax traitors that have been acting out roles for several decades now in the hopes that this narrative could be co-opted and used to herd the cats, the citizens of America. 45:48.348 --> 45:49.610 It's really that simple. 45:50.130 --> 45:54.455 There is a fake anti-vaccine movement that has captured a lot of people on the right. 45:56.598 --> 46:00.182 And it is a really dangerous position that we're in. 46:00.262 --> 46:03.465 Some of these people have been around since 2013, like Brian Hooker. 46:06.243 --> 46:08.805 And then in 2020, what was he doing? 46:08.825 --> 46:13.128 He was talking about, he was talking about the PCR test being okay. 46:13.188 --> 46:16.530 And that, you know, antibodies aren't a very good model of immunity. 46:16.690 --> 46:21.333 And there is definitely a novel virus and they haven't tested these vaccines enough yet. 46:21.373 --> 46:22.834 Then the signal is pretty low. 46:25.605 --> 46:31.826 And in 2021, he was building that health freedom, big top tent of health freedom. 46:32.286 --> 46:34.967 We just wanna be able to say and choose what we wanna do. 46:35.467 --> 46:41.028 So we're not actually interested in saving anybody or teaching anyone the truth so that they can save themselves. 46:41.428 --> 46:44.729 We're just interested in making sure that there's health freedom. 46:45.349 --> 46:48.249 And that means like, you know, freedom to say whatever we want to. 46:48.269 --> 46:51.590 And in 2022, after all the murder was over, that's still where they were. 46:52.450 --> 46:54.892 I'm still building a big top tent for health freedom. 46:54.932 --> 46:56.573 And that's actually when they hired me. 46:57.474 --> 47:01.056 And so, you know, it's, it's remarkable, ladies and gentlemen, it's 2025. 47:02.737 --> 47:09.482 And we're still playing the same game where nobody but me and Mark can say ingestion versus injection. 47:09.982 --> 47:12.824 Like, like the mom of that unvaccinated child. 47:12.844 --> 47:13.585 What's her name again? 47:13.885 --> 47:14.565 Brandy Vaughn. 47:14.625 --> 47:15.046 That's right. 47:15.987 --> 47:28.374 And that's remarkable, remember, because she was around for Vaxxed and Vaxxed 2 and trying to get on stage and putting her arm around everybody, calling them heroes and having them go, oh no, I'm nobody's hero, I'm not a hero. 47:28.974 --> 47:36.058 Ladies and gentlemen, this man with a vaccine-injured son named Brian Hooker, 47:37.284 --> 47:59.282 questioned the rationale of vaccination in general in 2013 did not use the word autism on purpose in 2013 because his child was neurologically injured by multiple vaccinations and he had 16 years of experience genetically modifying plants which means he knew what transformation and transfection was 47:59.982 --> 48:08.210 what it meant and why those words were absolutely appropriate for the adenovirus and the mRNA respectively. 48:09.181 --> 48:33.770 And Brian Hooker in 2020 was talking about the health freedom anti-mandate movement, talking about not giving kids vaccines when they have ear infections, talking about COVID having asymptomatic spread and confirming that it could be as long as five days, that antibodies aren't immunity, that the vaccine studies are underpowered, but doesn't say or explain that these are not investigational vaccines. 48:35.148 --> 48:38.829 These are already a known combination of substances. 48:38.869 --> 48:40.369 We know exactly what it will do. 48:40.950 --> 48:45.711 And from a biologist perspective, I know exactly the limitat- No, nothing like that at all. 48:45.771 --> 48:53.053 Instead, he was doing a back and forth calling with a Dr. Kendra about B-cells and T-cells and laughing! 48:55.394 --> 48:56.754 Two weeks after Brandy died. 48:58.015 --> 49:00.776 You know, Brandy Vaughn, have I mentioned her before? 49:00.816 --> 49:04.257 She's the one who did injection versus ingestion already in 2016. 49:04.697 --> 49:11.659 And then all these people met her and got on stage with her and took pictures with her and then wrote her out of the narrative. 49:16.741 --> 49:20.502 So this fake anti-vaccine movement is who's behind Robert F. Kennedy Jr. 49:20.722 --> 49:21.743 Robert F. Kennedy Jr. 49:21.803 --> 49:22.943 could be being played. 49:23.443 --> 49:25.544 And if he's being played, then he's just kind of a, 49:27.728 --> 49:28.748 He's not rescuable. 49:30.469 --> 49:32.569 I mean, I've already said it in an email. 49:32.609 --> 49:34.149 I've already said it in a Zoom meeting. 49:34.209 --> 49:37.430 I've already had the conversation and sent the mails too many times. 49:38.010 --> 49:53.673 He cannot be not aware of the fact that Robert Malone and Meryl Nass and Jessica Rose are some kind of performance team, test lorry, that is controlling or mitigating the 49:55.086 --> 50:00.589 the narrative that is on this side that ultimately is behind Bobby Kennedy. 50:00.689 --> 50:04.370 It's a very malevolent game that these people are playing. 50:05.491 --> 50:10.173 And that's why they don't say intramuscular injection is dumb or RNA cannot pandemic. 50:10.233 --> 50:14.615 They say things like people over profits, truce over lies, and courage over fear. 50:16.331 --> 50:19.134 And this is because this is about the Human Genome Project. 50:19.174 --> 50:30.446 The Human Genome Project is the largest, most expensive, multi-generational effort ever done by humankind to try and take advantage of 50:31.098 --> 50:47.525 the limited opportunity, limited on that time frame, on that time horizon, the limited number of these generations where there will be so many billion people on the planet, so many games of Go, so many games of chess to be collected over a lifetime. 50:48.588 --> 50:50.649 That opportunity is not going to exist forever. 50:51.349 --> 51:12.316 And on my website under the link stuff, I have this McKinsey report that talks about how the population pyramid data from the West indicates that there is going to be a population collapse, which means that this generation or the generation of our grandkids might be the last big giant data set that is available for collection. 51:12.716 --> 51:15.917 And so they are now going through iterative 51:17.087 --> 51:21.471 introductions of and testing of various systems that will collect that data. 51:21.852 --> 51:25.675 They're building the server net, the infrastructure to collect that data. 51:25.715 --> 51:33.262 Remember, in order to pull off the same thing that they did with Go, but to pull it off on the human genome, 51:33.662 --> 51:56.040 they are going to have to hold a lot more data in a server and have it be accessible to a central machine learning algorithm that infrastructure has been imagined but it needs to be scaled up and then scaled up again and so you might think it's for surveillance and it is but it is also ultimately to perform that 51:56.580 --> 52:02.541 final, you know, nested calculation where okay, now we have all the data and all those people are gone. 52:02.941 --> 52:06.022 And now we need to start the thing churning and it's not going to come. 52:06.402 --> 52:10.383 It's not going to come to, you know, figure out the human genome in a few hours. 52:13.004 --> 52:18.485 That's the trick to see that this is a one time in history when they can get the data. 52:19.405 --> 52:22.886 But that one time in history is like a couple generation window. 52:24.329 --> 52:29.794 the population of the world in a hundred years is gonna be very different. 52:30.715 --> 52:42.225 In fact, in a hundred years, and this is something you really need to get your head around, in a hundred years, everyone, everyone living on this planet will be dead. 52:43.286 --> 52:47.750 In a hundred years, everyone living on this planet will be dead. 52:49.292 --> 52:50.593 It's an absolute certainty. 52:51.581 --> 52:52.822 Well, maybe not a certainty. 52:53.343 --> 52:55.565 Maybe 15 of those people will be alive. 52:57.147 --> 52:58.208 Now, why is that important? 52:58.228 --> 53:14.544 It's important because the people who are in control of the largest piles of money in the world, who I'm not going to try to name here, but there are big piles of money and those piles of money have enormous potential to influence people. 53:15.862 --> 53:17.987 And it is used very well, I assure you. 53:18.007 --> 53:19.872 They've been practicing for generations. 53:20.473 --> 53:24.724 So these weaponized piles of money understand this. 53:26.261 --> 53:32.303 They don't think on three week social media timescales or three day social media timescales. 53:32.343 --> 53:34.903 They think on generational timescales. 53:35.703 --> 53:37.944 And so even a hundred years is quite short. 53:38.024 --> 53:42.845 But if you start to see that in a hundred years, everyone who was living on this planet will be dead. 53:43.405 --> 53:53.688 And if you were thinking wisely for your kids, you would be taking more of that into account in the way that you spent your time and energy trying to build things for your kids. 53:56.485 --> 54:00.289 And these people have been thinking that way for decades, for hundreds of years. 54:00.369 --> 54:01.249 You see the difference? 54:02.310 --> 54:07.155 And they think and see themselves rightfully superior to us because of that. 54:07.655 --> 54:15.002 The only thing you have to realize is that we've been raised to think incorrectly, raised that way by them. 54:16.844 --> 54:21.208 Despite the best efforts of some of the best parents on the planet, I know some people who had great parents. 54:22.739 --> 54:28.621 These people in recent memory were put in place, and if you want to know why, it's because of the Human Genome Project. 54:28.641 --> 54:33.082 That's why he's there, she's there, she's there, she's there, he's there. 54:33.463 --> 54:36.063 They're all connected to that directly. 54:36.604 --> 54:40.125 None of them have an indirect connection to these illusions. 54:40.165 --> 54:40.445 They are 54:41.045 --> 54:56.555 Direct connections to these illusions and some of them may be still unwittingly participating kind of just agreeing not to care or not pay attention and Allow them to use their substack and represent themselves or you know, maybe them and their twin are going around. 54:56.675 --> 55:07.722 I don't know But I do know for sure that I've had a conversation with some people and I think it's worth revisiting these conversations One 55:17.324 --> 55:20.628 I mean the greatest technology in the world is cups that don't get cold. 55:22.565 --> 55:29.368 If there's anything more disappointing than trying to get that last swig of coffee and finding it cold and when it's warm or even hot, it's spectacular. 55:30.429 --> 55:35.471 Just one reminder, very humbly, GigaOM Biological is supported only by viewers like you. 55:35.491 --> 55:38.993 If you go to GigaOMBiological.com, you can find everything from a P.O. 55:39.033 --> 55:40.854 box to a PayPal address. 55:41.554 --> 55:44.135 And any donations would be appreciated. 55:44.255 --> 55:48.057 And anybody that sets up a monthly kind of thing, wow, I mean, 55:49.062 --> 56:07.356 I don't know how to thank you other than to say that you are supporting some seriously, I think what I think is, I don't know, I'm either losing my mind, which is I guess very possible, or I'm fighting for my life and the rest. 56:07.577 --> 56:07.997 Who, what? 56:09.478 --> 56:10.379 Wow, that's weird. 56:11.678 --> 56:13.858 series recording me and talking to me in a weird voice. 56:14.959 --> 56:20.900 I am going to watch a video of myself interviewing Dr. Jay Bhattacharya. 56:20.940 --> 56:29.442 You may be familiar with him because he is actually the current NIH director, Dr. Jayant Bhattacharya, MD, PhD. 56:29.462 --> 56:34.303 I interviewed him on November 20th, 2023. 56:35.043 --> 56:38.604 And you will notice, although I won't show really what's here, 56:39.687 --> 56:42.108 You will notice some very familiar names in the chat. 56:43.108 --> 56:51.572 One interesting one that is in the chat constantly for this hour and a half is one Jessica Hockett using her full name. 56:51.712 --> 56:54.873 No ambiguity. 56:54.953 --> 56:58.214 It's Jessica Hockett, 1976 or something like that. 56:59.555 --> 57:02.596 It's remarkable, actually, if you think about it. 57:03.743 --> 57:08.625 Anybody that was going in my chat, who's ever gone in my chat, has not used their full name. 57:09.585 --> 57:13.986 I know nobody has used their full name in my chat. 57:14.166 --> 57:29.191 It is strange when anyone would go into any sort of chat situation and just put Jonathan Cooey, PhD, or even worse, Jonathan J. Cooey, but Jessica Hockett, not Jay Hockett, not 57:30.333 --> 57:37.099 Jess Hock, not, you know, Woodhouse 76, but Jessica Hockett, full name. 57:37.839 --> 57:43.504 And I have to say, the full video is on PeerTube. 57:44.625 --> 57:48.528 And it's in the Batcave, you can find that channel and it's there available to watch. 57:49.148 --> 57:52.471 I'm actually starting at about 40 minutes into the video. 57:54.333 --> 57:55.554 You can see the calendar there. 57:55.594 --> 57:56.435 We're in 2023. 57:56.815 --> 57:57.616 It's November 2023. 57:57.897 --> 57:59.138 That's where the red line is. 57:59.178 --> 58:01.260 The murder has already ended for about a year and a half. 58:02.201 --> 58:05.044 And I'm actually have entertained. 58:06.887 --> 58:34.061 Dr. Bhattacharya for 40 minutes here already and listened to him talk about censorship and you know asked him legitimate questions about what he thinks about the censorship and how it happened and you know what he thought about it how he experienced it because at this time I'm still really thinking that this is my friend and this is a guy who really wants to get to the truth and I've met him a couple times in person already by this time because we are we're both part of a group and 58:34.321 --> 58:37.763 that Greg Glassman put together called the Broken Science Initiative. 58:39.084 --> 58:42.146 And so, you know, I see him as a friend in this video. 58:43.106 --> 58:54.934 And at this stage in the video, we are just transitioning to talk about why it is that the university system in America and the way that science is done is broken. 58:56.735 --> 59:01.457 And what he will start with is the idea that 59:03.752 --> 59:08.455 Controlled speech is a part of the university system. 59:08.496 --> 59:15.521 And he just didn't realize that it was also part of biomedicine and that it was in those departments too. 59:16.041 --> 59:23.967 And that he's surprised that those departments are willing to censor their faculty, something to that effect. 59:24.928 --> 59:30.311 And before I start the video playing, I would like to suggest that 59:31.306 --> 59:50.423 I will pause it before we move on to my question to him in order to discuss why I think what he says about this problem is fundamentally incorrect, or at least it is a limited spectrum of question that doesn't really get at the heart of why academia is broken the way that it's broken. 59:51.624 --> 59:54.787 So let's just start this, see if we can get this going. 59:57.857 --> 01:00:00.378 I have to be honest, I did not see it before the pandemic. 01:00:00.458 --> 01:00:09.262 I felt it a little bit, I mean, in various areas, like, oh, I don't want to work on that because I don't want to, you know, step on people's toes or whatever. 01:00:10.043 --> 01:00:15.105 But I didn't think it was like at the heart of biomedical sciences. 01:00:16.044 --> 01:00:21.485 And I think a lot of people now in the biomedical sciences have started to see that it's there. 01:00:22.386 --> 01:00:34.249 And now the only question is, how can we structure the institutions of biomedical sciences so that people will feel free to speak? 01:00:35.975 --> 01:00:40.597 I think most scientists now understand that that's not there, and most scientists want that. 01:00:41.197 --> 01:00:53.142 And so we have an opportunity for reform, like an unprecedented, once-in-a-generation opportunity for reform, if we can just figure out how to get the right levers in place to do that. 01:00:53.903 --> 01:00:55.903 That's what I've been focused on trying to work on. 01:00:56.204 --> 01:00:59.205 I think the key thing for me, my role has been to try to 01:01:00.026 --> 01:01:11.722 Come up with reforms that are very broad number of scientists and other the populace at large can agree on Would be would be and try to build a coalition around that because it's you know science we think of is like this like 01:01:12.745 --> 01:01:14.346 thing that's separate from the society. 01:01:14.366 --> 01:01:14.747 It's not. 01:01:14.787 --> 01:01:15.787 It's part of society. 01:01:16.188 --> 01:01:17.469 Everyone now knows that. 01:01:18.369 --> 01:01:25.315 It's science itself that has been part of the very fabric of how we run our society the last three and a half years, right? 01:01:25.355 --> 01:01:26.916 And everyone sees that it's power. 01:01:27.436 --> 01:01:36.644 And that means now everyone has an interest in reforming it so that it can function the way it's supposed to function, not the way it did as a tool for authoritarian power. 01:01:37.458 --> 01:01:42.401 And so it was a tool for authoritarian power over the last three years. 01:01:43.242 --> 01:01:44.683 This is in November of 2023. 01:01:45.763 --> 01:01:49.566 So he's already being imprecise because it was the last four years. 01:01:50.166 --> 01:02:04.015 And actually before that, because a lot of the gears in the bureaucracy of the US government and the WHO and a lot of these other organizations with the gears were turning because of this, this 01:02:05.439 --> 01:02:15.525 scientific consensus about something, a scientific consensus about a pending crisis or a biological certainty, and yet he's talking something very different. 01:02:16.530 --> 01:02:31.521 He's talking about bringing, you know, academics together under a agreed on set of reforms that will be very amorphous and sort of ambiguous in terms of speech and, you know, what people are allowed to say or not say. 01:02:31.641 --> 01:02:38.166 And it doesn't sound at all like a genuine attempt to reverse the problem. 01:02:38.206 --> 01:02:44.071 And the problem is very succinctly what, the problem is very succinctly what 01:02:45.362 --> 01:02:51.570 what Peter Thiel says in my introductory slide, that the specialization should make you suspicious. 01:02:51.650 --> 01:03:03.725 No, the specialization has ruined biology because the specialization has created people that are so specialized as carpenters that they actually can't 01:03:04.551 --> 01:03:07.493 evaluate the work of other carpenters. 01:03:08.013 --> 01:03:21.262 Now, I want you to imagine how specialized a carpenter would need to be before he would be not be able to or feel uncomfortable criticizing someone's bookcase because he doesn't work on bookcases. 01:03:21.682 --> 01:03:24.844 He works on dovetail joints in drawers of bankers vaults. 01:03:24.984 --> 01:03:25.324 That's it. 01:03:25.885 --> 01:03:26.405 Nothing else. 01:03:26.485 --> 01:03:31.088 Or sorry, not bankers vaults, but roll top desks. 01:03:32.622 --> 01:03:35.643 And so he only does dovetail joints and roll top desks. 01:03:35.724 --> 01:03:38.305 And so he can't criticize that bookcase. 01:03:38.545 --> 01:03:40.586 You know what I mean? 01:03:40.946 --> 01:03:43.227 He's a wonderful bookcase maker. 01:03:43.647 --> 01:03:45.888 I really respect all bookcase makers. 01:03:46.549 --> 01:03:50.851 They work on things that I can't possibly, I don't know how you would ever use wood to hold books up. 01:03:52.412 --> 01:03:57.974 This is actually how biologists engage in biomedical research. 01:03:58.074 --> 01:04:01.216 They are so trained not 01:04:02.844 --> 01:04:21.673 to try and understand where their work fits in, what they know about other people's work, to be able to usefully think about other people's work, because that would create the possibility that any wasted time would be pruned and wasted time would be saved. 01:04:23.854 --> 01:04:29.417 It is remarkable how often in neuroscience alone, 01:04:30.509 --> 01:04:33.170 this would occur during my 20 year career. 01:04:33.970 --> 01:04:41.894 Sitting in a room with people like Jay Bhattacharya and asking a question that everybody else in the room just turns around and goes like, who the hell is that? 01:04:41.974 --> 01:04:43.715 Why is he asking that question? 01:04:43.755 --> 01:04:44.375 What do you know? 01:04:45.350 --> 01:04:50.152 And it's like, well, I'm sorry, were we not supposed to learn in Biology 101? 01:04:50.492 --> 01:04:56.294 Was I not supposed to listen to what I was told and process it and try to make it mesh together? 01:04:56.974 --> 01:05:02.316 Because right now what you're saying isn't meshing with what I understand, and so I want you to help me make it mesh. 01:05:04.037 --> 01:05:04.917 People hate that. 01:05:07.638 --> 01:05:09.659 People really, really hate that. 01:05:11.800 --> 01:05:13.561 And so when the no-virus people 01:05:14.602 --> 01:05:20.505 and the lab leak people, the gears never even come close to each other. 01:05:20.545 --> 01:05:27.249 So you can never ever see that they won't mesh because these people have agreed never to bring their gears together. 01:05:28.770 --> 01:05:31.992 And so you never know that this is not even a functional transmission. 01:05:32.052 --> 01:05:36.875 It's not even a, these people don't matter because their wheels are just spinning by themselves. 01:05:37.935 --> 01:05:42.638 And I think that for a long time, I think it's possible 01:05:45.498 --> 01:06:04.275 that a lot of these people have been knowing that they are a wheel spinning all by themselves and they've taken that role because they know that's a good paying job and it's going to get them a lot of free trips and a lot of fame and sell a lot of substacks because otherwise I can't explain it. 01:06:05.516 --> 01:06:07.518 Because any intellectual worth 01:06:10.546 --> 01:06:21.314 Any intellectual that claims to have integrity would be constantly trying to make sure that their gears meshed with their understanding of everything else. 01:06:23.896 --> 01:06:30.221 And so this guy is talking about trying to bring people together under common ground. 01:06:30.241 --> 01:06:33.144 He's auditioning for the NIH director position right here. 01:06:34.345 --> 01:06:35.886 He's testing out the language on me. 01:06:37.944 --> 01:06:39.065 But this is nonsense. 01:06:39.125 --> 01:06:43.628 This has nothing to do with what's really broken in academia, which is the specialization. 01:06:44.128 --> 01:06:46.109 Exactly what Peter Thiel talked about. 01:06:46.129 --> 01:06:51.633 The specialization is what should make you suspicious because it allows people to exaggerate and to lie. 01:06:51.653 --> 01:07:07.304 It actually encourages people to exaggerate and to lie and to say things like, you know, I work on the most important aspect of carpentry because dovetail joints are found in roll-top desks and dovetail joints are some of the oldest joints ever used in 01:07:08.204 --> 01:07:09.344 in carpentry. 01:07:11.745 --> 01:07:15.066 But I can't tell you anything about bookshelves because I don't do that. 01:07:18.547 --> 01:07:20.428 And I certainly don't know how to make a campfire. 01:07:28.550 --> 01:07:34.312 What about just the legal aspect of the pandemic? 01:07:34.452 --> 01:07:37.213 You talked a little bit about these people making all kinds of money. 01:07:38.144 --> 01:07:50.293 Um, some lawyers would argue, I think a lot of lawyers would argue that the only reason why that money can be made is because there's no strict liability for many of these classes of, of pharmaceutical products. 01:07:50.353 --> 01:07:56.998 And be that as it may, um, that's compounded by this ability for them to declare an emergency. 01:07:57.058 --> 01:08:00.400 And then basically, apparently a lot of these people are, 01:08:01.158 --> 01:08:03.920 more or less acting without consequence. 01:08:05.621 --> 01:08:17.508 So it's hard to ask these people to reflect on what they did and then change their behavior, whereas it almost demands that we have to take these people out of the driver's seats that they're sitting in and put other people there. 01:08:17.528 --> 01:08:18.929 I mean, how do we solve this problem? 01:08:20.350 --> 01:08:27.194 I mean, the power of pharma on our social structures is almost unimaginably great. 01:08:28.235 --> 01:08:29.816 And I think the United States in particular 01:08:30.962 --> 01:08:34.766 where you have direct-to-consumer advertising that's legal and possible. 01:08:36.027 --> 01:08:42.854 What that means is that pharma controls the purse strings of our media companies, our largest media companies. 01:08:43.593 --> 01:08:51.478 they have, as you said, they have a liability shield, especially for vaccines, that was put in place. 01:08:51.558 --> 01:09:00.984 What the argument for it being put in place was you don't want frivolous suits against the pharmaceutical companies that then send a signal to people to not be vaccinated. 01:09:01.404 --> 01:09:08.228 But the flip side of that is a commitment to responsible behavior by pharma, which we didn't have during the pandemic. 01:09:11.134 --> 01:09:17.858 And so you have essentially social contracts that have been broken all over the place regarding these things. 01:09:17.898 --> 01:09:20.040 And that's why I think it is a moment for reform. 01:09:20.540 --> 01:09:21.721 You talk about legal action. 01:09:21.941 --> 01:09:34.108 Actually, one major legal action I've been involved with is this Missouri versus Biden case, which is a case aimed at the Biden administration's, I call it the Ministry of Truth, their censorship industrial complex. 01:09:35.049 --> 01:09:46.062 That case, which is now sitting in front of the Supreme Court, it's revealed essentially a vast enterprise by federal government bureaucrats that will go to social media companies. 01:09:46.503 --> 01:09:48.665 And when I say bureaucrats, I mean like FBI, 01:09:50.270 --> 01:10:01.218 the CDC, the Surgeon General's office, the NIH will go to, and the White House itself will go to social media companies and say, here are the people I want censored. 01:10:01.659 --> 01:10:03.920 Here are the people, here are the ideas I want censored. 01:10:03.960 --> 01:10:05.141 This is probably why you were on Twitch. 01:10:05.161 --> 01:10:08.604 I mean, if you probably, I'm sure, I think I saw you on YouTube once upon a time. 01:10:09.304 --> 01:10:12.387 It was probably impossible on YouTube. 01:10:12.467 --> 01:10:15.310 You can't do this on YouTube. 01:10:15.350 --> 01:10:18.013 At least maybe not, definitely not back then. 01:10:18.073 --> 01:10:18.573 I had to move. 01:10:20.015 --> 01:10:20.255 Yeah. 01:10:20.715 --> 01:10:21.836 I mean, I think you were on the list. 01:10:21.936 --> 01:10:22.837 I know I was on the list. 01:10:22.897 --> 01:10:25.120 I was put on a Twitter blacklist the day I joined Twitter. 01:10:25.840 --> 01:10:29.464 That is not consistent with the American First Amendment. 01:10:30.106 --> 01:10:31.587 Like that is, and it's, and even more. 01:10:32.007 --> 01:10:42.332 I didn't get put on any blacklists until like 2023 when I was, or maybe it was 20, beginning of 2023 when I was very briefly off of Twitter. 01:10:42.913 --> 01:10:53.798 And I think that was actually a stunt because the real censorship didn't really, you know, they censored real people that they wanted to promote as being censored. 01:10:53.978 --> 01:10:58.561 Alec Berenson is the best example of a guy who was allowed 01:10:59.341 --> 01:11:10.203 to make something of his censorship in order to make something of Twitter censorship and eventually something of Elon Musk buying Twitter and saving it. 01:11:11.303 --> 01:11:12.844 This is all part of the same stunt. 01:11:13.804 --> 01:11:16.664 I assure you, it's all part of the same stunt. 01:11:17.124 --> 01:11:24.106 That's why all of these people agreed from Kevin McKernan all the way to Jay Bhattacharya. 01:11:24.766 --> 01:11:25.366 They agreed. 01:11:26.263 --> 01:11:42.847 that the mystery was being solved on Twitter, that the censorship on Twitter was crucial to fight against, that Elon Musk is saving the town square as free by buying Twitter. 01:11:42.907 --> 01:11:45.628 This is the reality of these people. 01:11:45.688 --> 01:11:49.929 That's part of the script that Jay Bhattacharya was absolutely on, and he's saying it right here. 01:11:50.655 --> 01:11:55.317 It's a violation of our basic civil rights. 01:11:56.017 --> 01:11:58.278 And for science, it is anathema. 01:11:58.638 --> 01:12:01.699 You cannot have science without free discussion of ideas. 01:12:02.200 --> 01:12:06.181 We're going to have ideas that we disagree with happen in science. 01:12:06.321 --> 01:12:10.723 And sometimes those ideas will be misinterpreted by others. 01:12:10.763 --> 01:12:13.064 The way that you deal with that is by free speech. 01:12:14.506 --> 01:12:16.809 So I think legal action is very, very important. 01:12:18.091 --> 01:12:24.600 If you'd asked me before the pandemic whether legal action and political action was important for science, I would have said, well, those are important maybe, but they're secondary. 01:12:24.680 --> 01:12:25.261 Now I think 01:12:26.228 --> 01:12:28.671 They're pretty much at the center. 01:12:29.252 --> 01:12:33.556 If you really want to reform things, you're going to need political action for reform. 01:12:33.576 --> 01:12:47.511 We're going to need legal action to constrain the excesses of, yes, pharmaceutical companies, but also governments and other entities that have ... I mean, I'll just take one that I still can't wrap my mind around. 01:12:49.299 --> 01:13:01.063 Universities mandated vaccines for young people at scale, even after credible evidence came out that young men especially had faced, I would call unacceptably high rates of myocarditis from this vaccine. 01:13:01.723 --> 01:13:15.627 And so here we are talking about mandating it for college kids, but not going all the way to the touchdown, which is that intramuscular injection of a transfection 01:13:17.185 --> 01:13:23.089 is not a useful way to augment the immune system of an otherwise healthy college adult. 01:13:25.771 --> 01:13:29.593 And it would be absurd to allow that to happen. 01:13:30.634 --> 01:13:32.575 And he did not speak out about that. 01:13:33.496 --> 01:13:35.937 He did not speak out in a useful way about that. 01:13:36.017 --> 01:13:39.540 CHD did not speak out in a useful way about that. 01:13:39.620 --> 01:13:41.081 If you fight the mandate 01:13:42.130 --> 01:13:52.017 You're not saying that a baseball bat to the head before you go to college is not only a bad idea, but definitely shouldn't be mandated. 01:13:52.077 --> 01:13:52.557 I mean, what? 01:13:57.961 --> 01:14:08.389 It is remarkable to see it in retrospect, and it is going to require a lot of work for everybody to see it in retrospect, but you got to do the work if you want to save your kids. 01:14:09.787 --> 01:14:22.411 If you want to build the courage inside of you, if you want to edify your belief in the truth and understanding of it and grasp of it and ability to share it, then you got to learn it. 01:14:23.871 --> 01:14:32.314 And learning it is going to require you to see how adept they are at sticking to the script. 01:14:34.694 --> 01:14:36.635 And yet they mandated it in order to go to school. 01:14:39.343 --> 01:14:43.945 The idea that there's no liability shield, that applies to pharmaceutical companies, it doesn't apply to universities. 01:14:45.706 --> 01:14:51.669 And many of them did it without, they weren't mandated to mandate it, they just did it. 01:14:52.529 --> 01:14:55.611 I think that there's going to be legal action at scale. 01:14:57.231 --> 01:14:58.832 Wow, that's exciting in a way. 01:14:58.892 --> 01:15:03.054 I mean, it's dark, but legal action at scale. 01:15:03.274 --> 01:15:06.016 Okay, now that I like to hear, but what are we gonna say? 01:15:07.014 --> 01:15:16.459 Are we gonna say that it was a transfection and it should never have been used in healthy college kids so that every one of those kids gets a free ride to those colleges? 01:15:16.479 --> 01:15:20.581 Does that ruin a lot of colleges in America in four years? 01:15:21.702 --> 01:15:22.682 Does it bankrupt them? 01:15:24.183 --> 01:15:24.683 Interesting. 01:15:25.904 --> 01:15:27.845 Interesting thing to put down on your notebook. 01:15:28.587 --> 01:15:37.011 I think there's a lot of peripheral malfeasance that went on in universities that could also catch into this, like the selling of the remnants of tests and this kind of thing. 01:15:37.951 --> 01:15:45.075 If this kind of suit were to catch momentum, it would also be a really wonderful opening for us to 01:15:46.167 --> 01:16:13.097 Readdress this age group because I do think that there's a purposefully They're purposefully disconnected from us I don't want to make any parallels to to too many other historical times when these these things happened But it does feel as though these college kids were really challenged To stand up for themselves and they were really beat down pretty hard by these universities in a coercive manner I mean in a coordinated manner 01:16:14.199 --> 01:16:25.389 I mean, my view is we basically robbed the younger generation with the idea that we're going to protect older generation, middle-aged people. 01:16:26.130 --> 01:16:33.717 It's a generational theft, and I don't think that the young people are going to treat us very kindly in how they think about us, and we deserve it. 01:16:33.737 --> 01:16:36.019 Almost by design, we deserve it. 01:16:37.034 --> 01:16:43.478 So he's interested in bringing science together under reforms that everybody agrees on. 01:16:43.958 --> 01:16:49.421 And you know, this bigger problem where we've lost the respect of our young adults, you know, that's no big deal. 01:16:54.965 --> 01:16:55.185 Perfect. 01:16:56.738 --> 01:16:58.719 Yeah, we deserve it, he says. 01:16:58.899 --> 01:16:59.460 Look at that face. 01:16:59.480 --> 01:17:02.301 We don't have time to right the ship, I feel like. 01:17:05.123 --> 01:17:12.908 My view is we basically robbed the younger generation with the idea that we're gonna protect older generation, middle-aged people. 01:17:12.928 --> 01:17:18.892 It was a generational theft, and I don't think that the young people are gonna- A generational theft of what? 01:17:20.553 --> 01:17:21.753 A good year of college? 01:17:24.095 --> 01:17:25.716 A generational theft of what? 01:17:27.398 --> 01:17:28.039 Can you see it? 01:17:29.139 --> 01:17:30.881 How ambiguous that statement is? 01:17:32.562 --> 01:17:37.166 And now he's gonna get right around the corner just to say that, well, you know, they don't trust us and they shouldn't. 01:17:38.147 --> 01:17:40.689 Treat us very kindly in their, in how they think about us. 01:17:40.829 --> 01:17:42.311 And you know, we deserve it. 01:17:43.832 --> 01:17:49.417 Yeah, it's a, well, if we can, we still have time to write the ship, I feel like. 01:17:51.198 --> 01:17:53.400 I still feel like we have time. 01:17:53.540 --> 01:17:54.441 He's not nodding. 01:17:55.956 --> 01:17:58.819 I still feel like we have time to right the ship. 01:17:59.940 --> 01:18:07.606 Of course, I'm talking about get the college kids back, get the young adults back, get their trust back, start to make them part of us again. 01:18:08.467 --> 01:18:14.893 You know, not fracturing America along age lines and generational lines and also along racial lines. 01:18:15.773 --> 01:18:18.576 It's like we're being put through some great big giant sieve. 01:18:23.725 --> 01:18:33.816 I mean, but people are all going to have to take their responsibility for what they did and how long it took them to realize that we were being herded and rushed and coerced. 01:18:34.842 --> 01:18:40.884 I mean, I have to, I've been, like, I'm by nature optimistic, Jay, but I have to say, like, I've been watching the UK COVID inquiry. 01:18:40.904 --> 01:18:42.424 I don't know if you've been watching it at all. 01:18:42.925 --> 01:18:43.825 Not directly, no. 01:18:44.245 --> 01:18:45.205 It's a whitewash. 01:18:45.966 --> 01:18:46.746 It's a whitewash. 01:18:46.786 --> 01:18:53.168 And you have, like, these people who basically were the architects of the lockdowns, giving themselves awards. 01:18:53.648 --> 01:18:55.969 You know, Tony Fauci's a professor at Georgetown now. 01:18:56.069 --> 01:18:58.790 You've got, you have all these, like, people who are, 01:19:00.350 --> 01:19:10.674 basically created an unprecedented authoritarian approach to the pandemic and caused harm at such scale. 01:19:11.234 --> 01:19:18.636 And they're essentially trying to pretend... Caused harm at such scale from the lockdowns, apparently. 01:19:18.656 --> 01:19:22.638 It wasn't the use of midazolam, starving people. 01:19:22.698 --> 01:19:29.220 The Scottish inquiry deserves a lot more attention because it has really exposed the fact that a country 01:19:29.813 --> 01:19:36.135 with an already inverted population pyramid took the opportunity of COVID to kill a bunch of old people. 01:19:36.955 --> 01:19:38.456 That's what happened in Scotland. 01:19:38.596 --> 01:19:40.796 And nobody's still, nobody's talking about it. 01:19:43.157 --> 01:19:44.578 They've starved people. 01:19:44.638 --> 01:19:46.198 They didn't give them antibiotics. 01:19:46.258 --> 01:19:47.319 They died of cold. 01:19:48.059 --> 01:19:49.859 They died of thirst. 01:19:51.280 --> 01:19:52.300 And they died alone. 01:19:55.581 --> 01:19:58.262 And that's the only death spike that there is in Scotland. 01:19:59.332 --> 01:19:59.692 murder. 01:20:05.655 --> 01:20:07.636 And this epidemiologist isn't aware of it. 01:20:07.656 --> 01:20:08.957 He's not saying anything about it. 01:20:09.017 --> 01:20:10.438 That same thing happened in America. 01:20:10.478 --> 01:20:14.359 Of course, it's easier to hide it in a country of 35, 350 million people where between 50 and 70,000 people die every week. 01:20:25.379 --> 01:20:36.690 The basic premise of the UK COVID inquiry thus far seems to be that if we'd only locked down harder and earlier, it all would have been fine. 01:20:38.352 --> 01:20:39.814 See, China did it in January 2020. 01:20:40.094 --> 01:20:40.935 We could have done it. 01:20:42.543 --> 01:20:50.227 That, I think, is rapidly becoming the standard playbook for managing pandemics. 01:20:50.388 --> 01:20:51.128 Is he yawning? 01:20:51.228 --> 01:20:52.949 Is this the second time he almost yawned? 01:20:52.969 --> 01:20:57.151 The next time anything like this happens, we will do this again, and we will lock down. 01:20:57.411 --> 01:21:05.395 The Biden administration has a plan in place that says, in the next pandemic, we will have a vaccine available at scale within 130 days. 01:21:08.078 --> 01:21:12.103 How do you test a vaccine for long-term consequences within 130 days? 01:21:12.123 --> 01:21:13.585 Well, they've already done it, right? 01:21:13.625 --> 01:21:15.827 They've already tested it in 5 billion people. 01:21:15.867 --> 01:21:20.313 So all future vaccines using mRNA are safe by their rationale. 01:21:21.294 --> 01:21:25.659 I mean, I just saw, Alex Berenson highlighted this, a report that there was a 01:21:27.586 --> 01:21:30.628 Alex Berenson highlighted this. 01:21:30.748 --> 01:21:43.274 This is the guy who started a substack called Illusion of Consensus with a Canadian kid who was first introduced to the world on the intellectual dark web stage of the Dark Horse podcast. 01:21:44.235 --> 01:21:51.418 Not with me, not with some student or a postdoc at Stanford, not with a fellow professor at Stanford. 01:21:51.478 --> 01:21:57.640 No, he started a podcast with some Canadian kid and a sub stack with some Canadian kid. 01:21:57.980 --> 01:21:59.141 That makes sense, doesn't it? 01:22:00.882 --> 01:22:07.124 Not with his friend from the broken science meetings that is barely making a living with a 01:22:08.294 --> 01:22:15.978 a family of five that he knows personally has lost his job at a University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine faculty position. 01:22:16.378 --> 01:22:17.318 He knows all of that. 01:22:17.779 --> 01:22:19.459 He's now the head of NIH. 01:22:20.120 --> 01:22:28.344 And I guess he still hasn't gotten around to calling me, but I'm sure he's going to call me in a few days and change is going to happen. 01:22:28.604 --> 01:22:29.024 It's coming. 01:22:31.761 --> 01:22:42.107 what was the mRNA platform vaccine for EBV, Epstein-Barr virus, that caused myocarditis in an early trial in a young man. 01:22:43.968 --> 01:22:44.849 And they stopped the trial. 01:22:44.889 --> 01:22:45.549 This is Moderna. 01:22:46.189 --> 01:22:54.234 And of course, now what we're discussing is myocarditis as a singular outcome or side effect 01:22:55.766 --> 01:23:16.656 of an investigational vaccine, completely in the slave speak, reinforcing the slave speak, repeating the slave speak, instead of calling it a transfection, instead of saying intramuscular injection is dumb, instead of saying they murdered people, we are still just kind of going along with the debate on television and he's happy to do it. 01:23:18.837 --> 01:23:24.300 I think, so I think that the idea that we... And he's looking down a lot. 01:23:26.138 --> 01:23:27.398 to both the left and the right. 01:23:27.478 --> 01:23:30.199 So maybe he's got things on both sides of his laptop. 01:23:30.819 --> 01:23:35.881 The plan is for future pandemics, we have a rapid vaccine. 01:23:36.181 --> 01:23:44.484 The consequence of that then is, like, just if you take it back one step, is what will we do for those 130 days while we're waiting for the test of the vaccine? 01:23:45.604 --> 01:23:46.544 Lock down, of course. 01:23:46.944 --> 01:23:47.585 We'll lock down. 01:23:47.845 --> 01:23:48.805 Essentially, that's the plan. 01:23:48.825 --> 01:23:50.165 That is the current template. 01:23:50.586 --> 01:23:52.906 So I think we need a political movement. 01:23:52.926 --> 01:23:55.107 We need a legal movement to undo that. 01:23:56.089 --> 01:24:03.915 And of course, the World Health Organization is creating this new pandemic treaty. 01:24:04.476 --> 01:24:11.341 It's an opportunity actually in 2024 to put that front and center in the presidential debate. 01:24:12.097 --> 01:24:17.321 Oh, so the who and its proposal should be front and center in the presidential debate. 01:24:17.361 --> 01:24:29.051 That's interestingly and very parallel to Meryl Nass' now very irrelevant door to freedom nonprofit that she started on her own with the help of Mary Holland to fight the who. 01:24:31.584 --> 01:24:50.829 And once you look backwards on this five-year theater scam, and you see how all of their actions and bullshit stories line up to make sure that the WHO is always seen as a problem and a bad guy, then you see that this whole theater is just, it is a theater. 01:24:51.949 --> 01:24:52.969 The WHO is irrelevant. 01:24:55.170 --> 01:24:59.391 The UN is irrelevant unless, you know, we go along with whatever they say. 01:25:01.607 --> 01:25:05.188 Unless we use it as an excuse that we have to do what they tell us to do. 01:25:06.248 --> 01:25:18.512 Unless we pretend that if the WHO passes a law that I guess it supersedes our Constitution because the United States signed the WHO treaty and every treaty is part of United States law, yada yada yada. 01:25:20.222 --> 01:25:25.885 That's all part of the same script that guy is on, just like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. 01:25:25.925 --> 01:25:27.086 seems to be held on. 01:25:27.566 --> 01:25:33.310 The same script that Robert Malone promotes on his silly sub stack and on every podcast he's ever on. 01:25:33.350 --> 01:25:40.554 It's the same script that is the sole reason for the non-profit Door to Freedom of Merrill Nass. 01:25:42.075 --> 01:25:43.196 It is absurdity. 01:25:46.129 --> 01:25:52.472 America is a sovereign nation until we stop believing in its sovereignty and stop defending it. 01:25:53.473 --> 01:25:54.273 Do we want that? 01:25:54.313 --> 01:25:58.495 If the United States says no to it, it'll send a powerful signal around the world. 01:25:58.515 --> 01:25:59.015 Do we want that? 01:25:59.055 --> 01:26:00.656 Let's make that into a political issue. 01:26:02.137 --> 01:26:02.757 Interesting. 01:26:03.057 --> 01:26:07.980 I'm going to shift back to data for a second, but I just drew some data and I want to ask you a question. 01:26:09.076 --> 01:26:13.658 because I've been trying to figure this out and whether it means anything or not, but maybe you can help me. 01:26:14.859 --> 01:26:20.022 So if I reverse this over here and put myself down here, this is my really bad drawing. 01:26:20.042 --> 01:26:21.723 Can you see that, of an age pyramid? 01:26:22.303 --> 01:26:25.505 So on the- Doesn't look like that anymore, Bob, nowadays. 01:26:26.065 --> 01:26:28.806 On the X-axis. 01:26:28.986 --> 01:26:32.508 It doesn't look like that now anymore, nowadays. 01:26:32.648 --> 01:26:37.451 So he knows already that the population pyramid has a funny bump on top. 01:26:38.854 --> 01:26:40.496 He's aware that this was coming. 01:26:40.536 --> 01:26:41.236 Did you hear it? 01:26:42.257 --> 01:26:43.078 He just said it. 01:26:43.098 --> 01:26:44.860 Oh, duh. 01:26:45.020 --> 01:26:46.061 Going up is age. 01:26:46.741 --> 01:26:49.244 I mean, I have a- Oh, wait. 01:26:49.564 --> 01:26:52.567 A distribution means anything or not, but maybe you can help me. 01:26:53.768 --> 01:26:58.933 So if I reverse this over here and put myself down here, this is my really bad drawing. 01:26:58.953 --> 01:27:00.634 Can you see that of an age pyramid? 01:27:00.654 --> 01:27:01.515 Yes. 01:27:01.535 --> 01:27:04.378 Doesn't look like that anymore, Bob, nowadays. 01:27:04.958 --> 01:27:20.107 on the on the the x-axis going up is age and then this is males and females and so you here you see a population where there's fewer old people than there are babies and it kind of goes up with a uh a more or less pyramidal distribution. 01:27:20.787 --> 01:27:29.653 What role do you think if any a distribution different than that whatever it would be but with a top heavy distribution could have been 01:27:30.613 --> 01:27:36.438 Seen coming and used as part of the way to create the panic that would you know? 01:27:36.538 --> 01:27:38.579 Exaggerate any exercise like this. 01:27:38.620 --> 01:27:40.321 Do you do you see that as a possibility? 01:27:40.361 --> 01:27:59.316 I've never seen anybody really look into this and because that could really explain an age vulnerability or it could explain a vulnerability to protocols or Or any number of things this could be used against us that couldn't necessarily wouldn't be present in a country like Peru or a country like 01:28:00.157 --> 01:28:03.200 Or maybe it is in Peru, I don't know off the top of my head what they look like. 01:28:03.260 --> 01:28:05.943 But I think you understand the question I'm asking. 01:28:05.963 --> 01:28:07.825 Yeah, so that's a really great question. 01:28:08.325 --> 01:28:12.569 And I don't think I've heard anyone, no one's asked me this in that way. 01:28:12.630 --> 01:28:14.251 And so it's a really interesting question. 01:28:14.271 --> 01:28:20.938 So I think, so first of all, that pyramid you had on the left, the age pyramid you had on the left, 01:28:21.378 --> 01:28:26.041 That is the traditional age pyramid that we had through much of the 20th century. 01:28:26.162 --> 01:28:27.042 Yeah, right. 01:28:27.182 --> 01:28:27.643 Exactly. 01:28:28.843 --> 01:28:36.269 It's not a surprise that we didn't lock down for a century respiratory virus pandemics, given that age pyramid. 01:28:37.510 --> 01:28:37.670 Right? 01:28:37.690 --> 01:28:43.053 We essentially like during in 1968, there was a massive flu pandemic in the United States. 01:28:43.073 --> 01:28:48.237 He's going to say that because we have a funny age pyramid with a lot of old people, we should have locked him down. 01:28:48.617 --> 01:28:49.738 Oh, I can hear it coming. 01:28:49.898 --> 01:28:50.459 Whoa. 01:28:51.437 --> 01:29:15.537 states and we had we had uh... woodstock happened during it right now in nineteen sixty eight nineteen fifty seven nineteen seventy six units even two thousand nine we we uh... the idea was develop uh... i was looking down treatment over there you try to repurpose drugs that they're they're already there focus protection on the most vulnerable people which were that little tiny group at the top 01:29:17.158 --> 01:29:20.501 And for the rest of the population, the idea of a lockdown would be unthinkable. 01:29:22.022 --> 01:29:32.570 Of course, also the other thing that played into that is like Zoom and this kind of technology actually allowed a certain class of people to think that they could escape the harms of a lockdown. 01:29:34.127 --> 01:29:35.829 So now let's go to the pyramid on the right. 01:29:36.430 --> 01:29:42.216 It doesn't quite look like that, but in the United States, but it looks a little bit like that where it's top heavy. 01:29:42.736 --> 01:29:49.684 You have a large group of people in the older population and actually a much smaller, younger population. 01:29:50.863 --> 01:29:53.524 The political power of that population is enormous. 01:29:54.185 --> 01:29:59.867 The orientation of public health toward that group up at the top is enormous. 01:30:00.507 --> 01:30:06.330 Oh, so public health is oriented around those old people. 01:30:06.390 --> 01:30:11.892 And so public health, wow, is that a crock of bullshit. 01:30:12.333 --> 01:30:12.873 Whoa. 01:30:14.187 --> 01:30:31.268 not particularly surprising that you would see public health make decisions with aiming at trying to protect that population at the expense of the young population because it's small this is just it's divide and conquer baby the old people took the vaccine do you do you remember oh my gosh 01:30:32.847 --> 01:30:33.588 Do you remember? 01:30:33.608 --> 01:30:36.012 I'm gonna look it up right now and put it on. 01:30:36.193 --> 01:30:37.956 It's exactly the same thing. 01:30:38.016 --> 01:30:39.719 They divided us on this. 01:30:39.779 --> 01:30:43.886 Look, SNL, what was it called? 01:30:50.250 --> 01:30:53.154 Most people, remember, now have some degree of protection. 01:30:53.194 --> 01:30:56.119 Remember getting vaccines into their older population. 01:30:56.299 --> 01:31:03.450 The majority of baby boomers have been vaccinated, have been vaccinated, have been vaccinated, vaccinated, vaccinated, vaccinated. 01:31:04.255 --> 01:31:23.173 baby boomers greatest generation got all the money now we got the vaccination crash the economy three whole times when it comes to the facts we the first in line got a job out of college no student debt retirement funded a hundred percent voted for trump but just for the taxes don't believe in covid still got the vaccine 01:31:24.534 --> 01:31:26.215 I never noticed it before. 01:31:26.315 --> 01:31:27.835 I never noticed that. 01:31:28.035 --> 01:31:32.197 I was too focused on the part of this song where he says immunity is antibody. 01:31:52.191 --> 01:32:02.938 to realize how much of this was very divisive about old people getting easy jobs, making easy money, having five houses. 01:32:03.358 --> 01:32:04.498 Oh my gosh. 01:32:06.259 --> 01:32:10.922 And Jay Bhattacharya is making the argument in the 20th of November, 2023, that it is that generation 01:32:14.963 --> 01:32:21.327 which has biased public health policy to protect itself at the expense of young people. 01:32:22.467 --> 01:32:23.508 Holy shit. 01:32:24.168 --> 01:32:25.069 I gotta play this out. 01:32:25.089 --> 01:32:42.559 ♪ Stopping me, never gonna die, drain your social security ♪ ♪ The boomers got the facts ♪ ♪ No rumors, just facts, yeah ♪ ♪ Give it up if you're 70 plus ♪ ♪ Everyone else getting jealous of us, jealous of us ♪ ♪ Ba-ba-ba-ba-ba-baby boomer ♪ ♪ Ba-ba-ba-ba-ba-ba-baby boomer ♪ 01:32:43.019 --> 01:32:43.179 Ow! 01:32:43.239 --> 01:32:44.680 COVID can't touch me now. 01:32:44.780 --> 01:32:46.901 Lone mask and a sore nose poking out. 01:32:47.141 --> 01:32:49.382 When it's time to pay, I whip the coupons out. 01:32:49.642 --> 01:32:52.043 Even though I got to send me in the bank account. 01:32:52.203 --> 01:32:53.083 Y'all can't see. 01:32:53.123 --> 01:32:54.524 Let me give you a clear sense. 01:32:54.824 --> 01:32:57.025 We out here spending your inheritance. 01:32:57.285 --> 01:32:59.406 You in the parking lot eating by the trash right. 01:32:59.646 --> 01:33:02.067 We in the booth reading menus with the flashlight. 01:33:02.847 --> 01:33:05.328 So it's funny that they say the climate denier. 01:33:05.348 --> 01:33:09.889 They say the princess again to make sure you remember that part of the narrative. 01:33:29.996 --> 01:33:33.478 The boomers got the backs. 01:33:33.638 --> 01:33:35.098 Everyone else get to the back. 01:33:35.359 --> 01:33:36.279 This is why I like it. 01:33:36.319 --> 01:33:37.620 Now you can't forget this. 01:33:58.726 --> 01:34:17.830 Not only did Saturday Night Live sing a scripted song about how boomers are assholes, and the whole system is rigged for them, is what Jay Bhattacharya said a couple years later on my podcast, who's now the head of NIH, is not by accident. 01:34:19.091 --> 01:34:21.111 Nobody's trying to unite anything. 01:34:22.475 --> 01:34:47.847 And Jay Bhattacharya saying that he wants to unite science on agreed upon reforms is such a flat tire compared to addressing the real problems in America that include this multi-generational schism that was created on purpose using the pandemic, exacerbated on purpose using the acquiescence to social media, which was created by the pandemic. 01:34:54.671 --> 01:34:55.812 smaller and less powerful. 01:34:58.073 --> 01:35:03.676 I do think that it's, I mean, the irony is that it ended up, they ended up harming old people too. 01:35:03.936 --> 01:35:11.079 Like there's data that came out in 2020 suggesting that there was a... This is not irony, okay? 01:35:11.240 --> 01:35:11.980 Don't listen to this. 01:35:12.040 --> 01:35:20.264 It's not irony that the system that was rigged to save the boomers actually also hurt the boomers. 01:35:20.304 --> 01:35:21.645 That is such bullshit. 01:35:22.762 --> 01:35:30.887 It's such a nonsense way to look at what happened when there was an anticipated rise in all cause mortality that we just got done talking about. 01:35:31.327 --> 01:35:36.750 And he is trying to obfuscate as a primary biological signal. 01:35:37.550 --> 01:35:44.194 No, actually the population pyramid is something that they could lie about and create exactly this. 01:35:45.195 --> 01:35:52.159 This murder and lies right here with a little help from protocols, a little help from lying. 01:35:53.032 --> 01:35:54.693 That's it, nothing more. 01:35:56.995 --> 01:36:13.148 And this continued increase in all cause mortality that's seen around the world in the West that Denny Rancor is on the fringe podcasts telling everybody about is due to the shot is an anticipated rise in all cause mortality that's been coming for decades. 01:36:13.649 --> 01:36:20.895 That our population pyramids showed everybody working at every institution, including insurance companies for decades. 01:36:23.342 --> 01:36:25.723 And that's why he talked his way right around that. 01:36:27.383 --> 01:36:38.287 I asked him a question, could the population pyramid contain a signal, a rise in all cause mortality that could be misconstrued as a crisis? 01:36:38.407 --> 01:36:51.572 And he said, no, but the population pyramid is in fact a bunch of old people taking advantage of their political power and rigging the system against the young or something like that. 01:36:56.701 --> 01:36:58.422 He's NIH director right now. 01:36:59.023 --> 01:37:05.328 Like a huge increase in deaths from dementia because you isolate old people, you cause all kinds of harm to them. 01:37:05.368 --> 01:37:09.732 A huge increase in dementia because there's a huge increase in old people. 01:37:10.573 --> 01:37:11.093 That's it. 01:37:12.274 --> 01:37:15.097 An anticipated rise in dementia that's not due 01:37:18.635 --> 01:37:28.521 Then I think the irony is like by trying to protect older people via a lockdown, via these draconian measures, you ended up harming them. 01:37:29.942 --> 01:37:32.964 And- We did not want to protect old people by locking down. 01:37:33.004 --> 01:37:34.825 We wanted to flatten the curve. 01:37:34.865 --> 01:37:39.788 We wanted to stop the spread of a novel respiratory pathogen. 01:37:39.808 --> 01:37:41.069 He's got it all mixed up. 01:37:41.409 --> 01:37:45.752 The guy who's the NIH director can't even explain the basic premise of the pandemic. 01:37:46.803 --> 01:37:51.466 The basic premise of the lockdown was to stop spread. 01:37:51.947 --> 01:38:03.716 Bret Weinstein argued for three years that we should try to get to zero COVID and even made the argument that if we just force drugged everybody with ivermectin and silicoxib for 60 days, that zero COVID was achievable. 01:38:03.776 --> 01:38:05.757 The lockdown wasn't to protect people. 01:38:06.177 --> 01:38:10.901 It was to end the disease, to end the biological phenomenon. 01:38:13.678 --> 01:38:17.719 also alienating and harming the huge numbers of young people. 01:38:18.659 --> 01:38:20.860 That population pyramid, you're absolutely right. 01:38:21.120 --> 01:38:31.102 I hadn't thought about bringing that together, but I think that played a big role, especially when you connect it with political power over the various generations. 01:38:31.322 --> 01:38:38.504 Big role in... Not when you connect it to the political power, when you connect it to the anticipated change in numbers. 01:38:39.580 --> 01:38:42.282 Change in the abundance of ill people. 01:38:42.822 --> 01:38:46.645 Change in the effect of how you treat those ill people. 01:38:49.047 --> 01:38:51.189 A sculpting using murder and lies. 01:38:51.269 --> 01:38:57.273 So he's right there, very close to saying it, but he thinks it's mostly political power, you know, because there's a lot of them. 01:39:00.396 --> 01:39:04.679 In the strategies that we follow and the policies that we follow during COVID. 01:39:06.545 --> 01:39:09.386 And potentially the outcome, right? 01:39:09.986 --> 01:39:30.874 If we could see that pyramid accurately and could expect a two or three year brief increase in all cause mortality because these old people are getting past expected age of death, then that could have been... Okay, I'll play along with the chat because I think it's important to recognize that. 01:39:30.914 --> 01:39:33.375 I'm gonna turn that on quick to see if I can get that on screen. 01:39:33.415 --> 01:39:33.775 There it is. 01:39:35.099 --> 01:39:39.500 And if I unlock it, I might be able to move it around a little bit and put it right here. 01:39:40.461 --> 01:39:44.842 So somebody asks, doesn't he have a point? 01:39:44.942 --> 01:39:47.102 Congress is all boomers and they all shit their pants. 01:39:47.162 --> 01:39:48.383 That is absolutely true. 01:39:48.543 --> 01:39:52.444 And I'm not discounting that part of the ability to trigger it. 01:39:53.284 --> 01:40:03.668 And the fact of it is that the bureaucracy and everybody in it, the older they are, the more likely they are to believe it because they were there while the narrative was being seeded over the last 30 years. 01:40:04.128 --> 01:40:05.489 And so you're absolutely right. 01:40:05.569 --> 01:40:12.772 In order to get the theater to go, the place that the boomers were at and the power that they had, the influence they had over companies and things like that, 01:40:13.232 --> 01:40:15.793 It made it easy to enact these measures. 01:40:15.874 --> 01:40:18.095 It made it easy to put this pressure on people. 01:40:18.115 --> 01:40:19.055 You're absolutely right. 01:40:19.956 --> 01:40:26.639 But I think it is a distortion to say that those people were thinking that they were acting in their own interest. 01:40:26.679 --> 01:40:28.500 They were just acting like dum-dums. 01:40:28.640 --> 01:40:31.682 They were acting like people who were doing their jobs. 01:40:31.782 --> 01:40:37.765 They knew that when the emergency light goes on, that they had a list of things that they were supposed to do and say, and they did that. 01:40:38.625 --> 01:40:41.227 I don't think it's much simpler, much more complicated than that. 01:40:41.247 --> 01:40:41.787 But you're right. 01:40:42.467 --> 01:40:55.615 I just want you to see that when those old people are available, and those old people are expected to be going to the hospital normally anyway, here's the here is the, you know, 2014 data, right between 60,000 and 50,000 people every year are going and dying. 01:41:00.916 --> 01:41:04.401 And a lot of them in red down here are pneumonia deaths. 01:41:04.621 --> 01:41:11.771 And so the pneumonia deaths at the start of the pandemic skyrocketed because they changed the way that they treated bacterial pneumonia. 01:41:12.252 --> 01:41:14.255 Simple and efficient. 01:41:15.156 --> 01:41:16.618 Changing the way that they treated 01:41:17.062 --> 01:41:30.053 bacterial pneumonia, changing the way that they used ventilation, the way that they used supplementary oxygen, the way that they applied remdesivir or midazolam or isolated people, it all had an effect. 01:41:30.193 --> 01:41:38.039 And because the population pyramid had the shape that it did, the predominant deaths were in the old people, but not all of them. 01:41:38.800 --> 01:41:45.882 Letting an opioid crisis go bananas also reduced life expectancy in America, and this guy doesn't appear to be aware of that at all. 01:41:46.182 --> 01:41:47.662 But maybe I'll bring it up in a minute. 01:41:50.863 --> 01:41:53.563 Empowering, or what's the right word? 01:41:53.683 --> 01:42:00.065 It could have facilitated this in terms of their ability to exaggerate it as much as possible. 01:42:01.885 --> 01:42:04.726 I want to try and formulate this right, but is there any 01:42:07.321 --> 01:42:24.490 combination of data and testimony or a specific data set that you would need to see where you would start to consider the possibility that there was no more significant spread in 2020 than there was back in 2002 where 01:42:26.930 --> 01:42:30.151 10,000 people were supposedly infected and 700 people died. 01:42:30.812 --> 01:42:42.696 And so if we had the data to show that actually just by scaring everybody, which we've already acknowledged has a huge effect, and also adding that up, right, because you 01:42:43.476 --> 01:42:56.779 In my mind, one has to factor in not just that we were misled about ventilators and not just that they went crazy on our constitutional rights, but that that all occurred at the same. 01:42:56.819 --> 01:43:01.301 They decided that all of these things were a good idea at the same time, including the lying. 01:43:01.981 --> 01:43:08.763 And so the question becomes then at what point are we obligated to take their word or 01:43:11.658 --> 01:43:26.355 How do we verify that a real bona fide pandemic occurred as opposed to a flash in the pan that they knew already would only be a flash in the pan or a background signal that they knew they could take advantage of? 01:43:26.435 --> 01:43:27.556 Maybe even they put it there. 01:43:27.777 --> 01:43:30.580 I mean, that's obviously crazy, but it 01:43:31.471 --> 01:43:54.266 In light of what we know about how we're governed on all other aspects of our reality, how often they will lie about political things and funding for highways and whatever else, it just seems to me very difficult to dismiss the possibility that, as I said before, that 01:43:55.230 --> 01:43:57.352 that we are not doing an accurate accounting. 01:43:57.592 --> 01:44:07.480 And if we did an accurate accounting, especially from the epidemiological perspective, we might find that none of these models will fit if you had the real data. 01:44:07.520 --> 01:44:14.225 I mean, I question, for example, we go back to that, that the model, you know, as you extend the variables and change it to fit things, 01:44:16.620 --> 01:44:24.246 One has to do that in every separate geography then in order to fit an SIR model to every outbreak that occurred. 01:44:24.806 --> 01:44:26.807 So you can do that in an isolated place. 01:44:27.468 --> 01:44:34.113 But if you take into account all the timing of those isolated fits, then there's no spread between them. 01:44:35.073 --> 01:44:36.494 And there's no additive effect. 01:44:36.975 --> 01:44:44.420 And there are none of these things that would be expected from, again, what is supposed to be a relatively uniform pathogen that started at a point. 01:44:45.706 --> 01:44:53.309 And those are the kinds of things that it seems to me aren't accurately reflected on anymore with the idea of just saying, well, it happened. 01:44:53.949 --> 01:44:55.010 Obviously it happened. 01:44:55.530 --> 01:45:05.674 And obviously something happened, but I wonder if we're giving them too much benefit of the doubt with regard to, did they get it right or not? 01:45:07.967 --> 01:45:10.991 I mean, I guess, so a couple, there's a few elements of that. 01:45:11.031 --> 01:45:13.094 So, like, first, the scientific element, right? 01:45:13.134 --> 01:45:24.951 So, you're asking, if I can rephrase it a little bit, you're asking what would lead to a rejection of an SIR kind of framework? 01:45:25.720 --> 01:45:29.803 what data set would one need to reject an SIR kind of framework? 01:45:30.263 --> 01:45:31.524 I mean, I do think that's possible. 01:45:31.804 --> 01:45:35.407 I don't think that the SIR model has zero empirical content. 01:45:35.867 --> 01:45:44.073 Like you can see... I see in the chat, it says, Jessica Hawk in 1976 says, JJ is doing well. 01:45:47.258 --> 01:45:48.499 Interesting. 01:45:48.579 --> 01:45:53.622 He is about to say now that what we're talking about is this SRI model. 01:45:54.783 --> 01:45:59.686 It's like the one where people are infected and not infected, and then it spreads around, and it's only got three variables. 01:45:59.726 --> 01:46:00.246 I don't even know. 01:46:00.266 --> 01:46:07.371 I can't explain it off the top of my head, but it's a ridiculously sort of exponential model of spread, this kind of thing. 01:46:07.431 --> 01:46:10.573 And it's also the basis, I think, for the R0 idea. 01:46:13.334 --> 01:46:14.955 or partially the basis for it. 01:46:15.035 --> 01:46:30.206 Anyway, it's a very simple model of epidemiological spread and you can tweak the numbers, the variables in that model to basically map any kind of bump in cases and to make any kind of prediction that you want to. 01:46:30.967 --> 01:46:36.551 And he is rephrasing my question to say, I think it's a reasonable rephrasing of the question, 01:46:37.251 --> 01:46:41.337 what data would be required in order to reject that model. 01:46:41.397 --> 01:46:50.771 And by rejecting that model, then you would be essentially saying that it's not a spreading pathogen because the model is of spreading pathogen spread. 01:46:50.831 --> 01:46:52.413 And when pathogen spread in a 01:46:53.414 --> 01:46:54.835 in a naive population. 01:46:54.915 --> 01:47:04.222 And so if that data isn't there, then it's not spreading in a naive population, then we can start to back up and say, okay, maybe was this a background signal? 01:47:04.242 --> 01:47:04.942 Was it released? 01:47:05.002 --> 01:47:05.363 Whatever. 01:47:05.803 --> 01:47:09.246 And so I'm trying to get him to think about that without putting him directly on the spot. 01:47:09.926 --> 01:47:12.508 And he seems to understand the question to a certain extent. 01:47:14.725 --> 01:47:21.610 Take the rise of obesity in a population. 01:47:22.190 --> 01:47:24.992 It's really hard to fit that in an SIR framework. 01:47:25.833 --> 01:47:31.777 It doesn't look like an infectious idea. 01:47:33.959 --> 01:47:40.263 It's not that the SIR framework is devoid of empirical content, but it is a very broad model so that you can get 01:47:40.999 --> 01:47:49.301 very large, very diverse phenomena that fit under some parameterization of an SRM. 01:47:49.461 --> 01:47:51.162 Of course, that's different from saying it's true. 01:47:51.222 --> 01:47:59.324 It just means it survived an attack on it based on a falsification test. 01:47:59.724 --> 01:48:05.485 Let's make sure that we go back to the rudimentary model understanding to make sure that we're all on the same page. 01:48:05.645 --> 01:48:07.786 I can make a model of 01:48:10.305 --> 01:48:17.593 For example, I could make a model of day and night, and I could make that model in a box. 01:48:20.116 --> 01:48:30.649 And if that box had a hole in the top, and then in the top of the box I put a ball, and that ball could spin. 01:48:32.028 --> 01:48:35.790 And then half the ball was dark and half the ball was light. 01:48:36.830 --> 01:48:39.992 And that ball spins inside the box. 01:48:40.192 --> 01:48:40.492 I don't know. 01:48:40.512 --> 01:48:43.473 I'm not really drawing it very well because I don't know how to draw a ball in that box. 01:48:43.513 --> 01:48:45.254 But anyway, you can imagine, right? 01:48:45.294 --> 01:48:46.294 There's a ball in the box. 01:48:47.495 --> 01:49:08.105 the ball extends in here and then you can spin the ball and you can simulate night and day by just spinning this ball at every 24 hours and the amount of light versus dark is visible is kind of you know proportional to the total amount of daylight and it won't recapitulate everything about night and day but it will recapitulate a lot 01:49:11.602 --> 01:49:17.948 And the test, testing it and falsifying it is somewhat obvious. 01:49:19.629 --> 01:49:29.198 But the more flexible a mathematical model is, the much more, it's much more difficult to say, okay, this model, it doesn't work anymore. 01:49:29.238 --> 01:49:31.059 It doesn't recapitulate reality. 01:49:32.421 --> 01:49:33.662 I can come up with a better model. 01:49:34.540 --> 01:50:01.105 The SRI model, or SIR model, or whatever it is, this very simple model of epidemics that all these epidemiologists stick to, and Sandra Gupta is an expert in, this is a model that is so mathematically flexible that it can be made to seem to explain, as he said, a whole bouquet of phenomena. 01:50:03.257 --> 01:50:06.540 It doesn't mean that it results in explanation. 01:50:06.700 --> 01:50:09.242 And that is the key point to understand here. 01:50:09.682 --> 01:50:13.986 And it's an irrelevant discussion in the end for what we're trying to get at. 01:50:14.547 --> 01:50:17.669 I think, you know, like social science phenomena are funny in this way, right? 01:50:17.729 --> 01:50:19.431 It's not like physics. 01:50:20.151 --> 01:50:21.933 They're often multiple stories. 01:50:23.610 --> 01:50:26.912 that explain something that's happening in a social science setting. 01:50:27.913 --> 01:50:36.859 And I mean, I guess with my background, I kind of have become very comfortable with the existence of multiple stories. 01:50:37.640 --> 01:50:47.146 And it's, but I also become, I also understand like how challenging it is to try to decompose the phenomena that you see. 01:50:47.186 --> 01:50:49.648 As you said, we saw, we saw what we saw, it happened. 01:50:51.029 --> 01:50:51.649 How much each, 01:50:53.070 --> 01:50:59.876 explanation for the various things that led to that thing that we saw happen are responsible. 01:50:59.896 --> 01:51:08.043 Like we're still arguing over the Great Depression, you know, 80 years later as to the particular, like the various things that we think caused it. 01:51:09.624 --> 01:51:17.271 I think the one, trying to come up with some analogy and the one that keeps coming back to me, which is falling short always, but it's the best one I got, 01:51:18.198 --> 01:51:25.832 is can you imagine a scenario where they convinced us that before the pandemic there were no cars? 01:51:27.179 --> 01:51:29.481 And then they told us, but there's a real easy test. 01:51:29.521 --> 01:51:30.622 We can sell you a test. 01:51:31.563 --> 01:51:38.148 And when you swab your garage and you find rubber and it's in the round shape, you've got a car. 01:51:38.828 --> 01:51:43.092 And not everybody's going to have, you know, not everybody's going to smell like gasoline. 01:51:43.132 --> 01:51:45.674 Not everybody's going to be driving in a car. 01:51:46.054 --> 01:51:49.637 Some people can have a car and be asymptomatic and they take their bike to work all the time. 01:51:50.217 --> 01:51:58.779 But you've got a car in your garage, and they could convince us that this is spreading around the world, when in fact it was in the background all the time. 01:51:58.819 --> 01:52:02.440 All they have to do is never have any data about cars before this. 01:52:03.300 --> 01:52:07.661 And they don't have any data about SARS-CoV-2 and related viruses before this. 01:52:07.901 --> 01:52:08.581 He's typing. 01:52:08.741 --> 01:52:14.362 From a global perspective, they have it from a few hundred bats and a few other places. 01:52:14.562 --> 01:52:15.243 He's typing. 01:52:15.303 --> 01:52:17.063 Wherever they look, they kind of find a signal. 01:52:18.678 --> 01:52:24.542 And so I'm really and I'm not trying to beat a dead horse or push you in a direction You don't want to discuss. 01:52:24.662 --> 01:52:24.802 No. 01:52:24.822 --> 01:52:46.234 No, this is I think it's really just I feel I feel that there's also this extra portion which we talked about before we turned on the the stream that that They are especially out on a limb when they imply that this phenomenon is being driven by an RNA molecule I would actually have a lot harder time biologically 01:52:48.919 --> 01:53:14.666 discussing this if somehow or another there was a high-fidelity DNA molecule at the center of this with a whole host of enzymes that we've never seen before and other attributes which could explain how something that was released at a point could then Result in a high-fidelity spread that you know that if you do some of the funny calculations like how many viruses would be in the wet market and then how many are there now and there's this many cases and 01:53:15.864 --> 01:53:20.345 It's an extraordinary biological phenomenon that they claim happened. 01:53:20.446 --> 01:53:28.048 And with no precedence in previous biology, there's no evidence of an RNA molecule that's capable of copying itself to this degree. 01:53:28.088 --> 01:53:31.569 We've never seen a background signal with this degree of fidelity before. 01:53:32.229 --> 01:53:35.110 So it begs the question of whether that was always there. 01:53:37.975 --> 01:53:42.218 So a couple of notes I made for what you said. 01:53:42.278 --> 01:53:49.864 So one is, it's not without precedent that there would be a test-demic, if you will. 01:53:50.625 --> 01:53:53.147 It has happened, even in the recent past. 01:53:53.927 --> 01:53:57.190 It was like 2008 in Dartmouth. 01:53:57.730 --> 01:54:06.077 There was a huge number of people that were diagnosed with pertussis, which should be pretty rare. 01:54:07.213 --> 01:54:18.103 And especially since so many people have had the DPT vaccine at scale, that you shouldn't have seen such a massive outbreak of pertussis in a place. 01:54:18.403 --> 01:54:21.526 I just said RNA cannot pandemic. 01:54:21.746 --> 01:54:29.994 There's no precedence in biology for an RNA virus doing this, an RNA molecule going from a point and spreading everywhere. 01:54:30.194 --> 01:54:32.116 And he is ignoring it. 01:54:32.376 --> 01:54:32.656 I mean, 01:54:33.457 --> 01:54:35.278 full-on ignoring it. 01:54:35.738 --> 01:54:37.018 Notice it clearly, please. 01:54:37.038 --> 01:54:38.238 A place like Dartmouth, New Hampshire. 01:54:39.039 --> 01:54:42.139 It has happened in many cases. 01:54:43.380 --> 01:54:46.841 It's an extraordinary biological phenomenon that they claim happened. 01:54:47.961 --> 01:54:55.563 And with no precedence in previous biology, there's no evidence of an RNA molecule that's capable of copying itself to this degree. 01:54:55.603 --> 01:54:59.084 We've never seen a background signal with this degree of fidelity before. 01:54:59.744 --> 01:55:02.585 So it begs the question of whether that was always there. 01:55:04.815 --> 01:55:06.055 Sorry, I keep hitting the wrong one. 01:55:06.075 --> 01:55:09.856 So a couple of notes for what you said. 01:55:09.916 --> 01:55:17.478 So one is, it's not without precedent that there would be a testdemic, if you will. 01:55:18.098 --> 01:55:20.759 That has happened, even in the recent past. 01:55:21.539 --> 01:55:24.800 It was like 2008 in Dartmouth. 01:55:25.340 --> 01:55:33.702 There was a huge number of people that were diagnosed with pertussis, which should be pretty rare. 01:55:35.644 --> 01:55:46.947 And especially since so many people have had the DPT vaccine at scale, that you shouldn't have seen such a massive outbreak of pertussis in a place like Dartmouth, New Hampshire. 01:55:47.747 --> 01:55:50.448 I think it was 2008. 01:55:50.708 --> 01:55:51.728 I'm blanking on the date. 01:55:52.468 --> 01:55:57.090 If you type in pertussis Dartmouth, New York Times, you'll find the New York Times story about this. 01:55:57.770 --> 01:56:02.871 It turned out that it was based on a faulty test. 01:56:03.979 --> 01:56:15.427 that in fact the pertussis diagnosis, which was made on the base of the test and then just some coughing symptoms, was actually a false diagnosis. 01:56:15.847 --> 01:56:19.369 The test itself was picking up pertussis that wasn't there. 01:56:19.569 --> 01:56:21.671 There was a false positive, pure false positive. 01:56:22.391 --> 01:56:32.638 And that the outbreak then was not actually pertussis, but people had panicked around this sort of dangerous disease spreading around because of the test. 01:56:34.172 --> 01:56:35.733 So I'm not saying that that's not possible. 01:56:35.813 --> 01:56:36.854 It certainly is possible. 01:56:37.855 --> 01:56:48.805 There, what happened was that people found out that the test was faulty, and so faulty that it, and then they go back and do a correlation. 01:56:48.865 --> 01:56:51.267 It's like, okay, yeah, we were misdiagnosing this. 01:56:52.901 --> 01:57:06.205 So at the end of 2020, just to put a put a an anecdotal data point on the field, at the end of 2020, the FDA had approved 226 different EUA test products. 01:57:07.045 --> 01:57:13.127 So it wasn't one faulty test, there was a possibly over 200 tests with various 01:57:14.738 --> 01:57:17.079 faulted properties and that all had to be false. 01:57:17.300 --> 01:57:29.507 I think that so like I mean you're the expert on the biology of this I don't know how to speak to the RNA fidelity about but I will say like I think I don't know how to speak to the RNA fidelity 01:57:33.877 --> 01:57:35.158 That's pretty bad. 01:57:35.999 --> 01:57:39.181 We didn't talk at all about the population pyramid, really, honestly. 01:57:40.282 --> 01:57:45.005 And he just got through explaining how there can be a test-demic. 01:57:46.914 --> 01:57:52.637 But I guess it wasn't this one, even though we have 200 EUA approved tests on the market. 01:57:52.737 --> 01:57:55.418 I'm not sure how to, I don't know how to talk about that. 01:57:55.778 --> 01:58:04.502 I don't think we've ever tested a virus spreading or a disease spreading at scale the way we tested this thing. 01:58:05.703 --> 01:58:09.004 Huge, just, I mean, unimaginable numbers of tests. 01:58:09.684 --> 01:58:13.266 And not just tests, but like genetic sequencing of the viruses. 01:58:13.346 --> 01:58:15.667 And I wonder if we did this to, 01:58:20.874 --> 01:58:21.615 It's fabulous. 01:58:21.815 --> 01:58:23.716 It's absolutely fabulous. 01:58:24.416 --> 01:58:30.560 Every single virus, what we would find, we probably haven't, not probably, we haven't looked. 01:58:31.281 --> 01:58:42.508 Like our systems, even for flu, for instance, are the- We haven't looked and think if the most abundant signal in the background is actually bacteriophages, and we haven't looked. 01:58:46.185 --> 01:58:51.950 Oh boy, ladies and gentlemen, there is some serious, oh my goodness, you're the biologist indeed. 01:58:51.970 --> 01:58:54.853 He's like Sentinel Labs, very little sequencing. 01:58:54.873 --> 01:58:57.776 There's some sequencing, but not nearly as much. 01:58:58.216 --> 01:59:04.501 I want to throw one thing in there just because I feel like it's something you might not be aware of given the discussion we're having now. 01:59:05.823 --> 01:59:10.607 Prior to 2020, if you go back to all these papers where they're looking at coronaviruses, 01:59:11.895 --> 01:59:25.806 The main strategy using PCR was to target a 350 base pair amplicon of the RNA dependent RNA polymerase, the most conserved region of the most vital protein in the viral genome. 01:59:26.707 --> 01:59:30.851 And indeed, depending on the country and depending on the 01:59:31.747 --> 01:59:38.035 The test you're looking at, there was an RNA-dependent polymerase amplicon. 01:59:38.055 --> 01:59:41.018 There was also an N-protein or an E-protein amplicon. 01:59:41.619 --> 01:59:48.027 The interesting thing about N and E are also, these are proteins that are relatively homologous across coronaviruses. 01:59:49.268 --> 02:00:04.711 One of the things that I think we have to somehow or another get all the way to the finish line is to resolve this idea that the PCR was specific enough to be used in the way it was used and that's also part of this conflated background signal. 02:00:05.032 --> 02:00:11.233 You were searching for RNA noise and there's always RNA noise there so you're going to get a certain percentage 02:00:13.409 --> 02:00:27.820 of positive signal, this is also why I believe it's dangerous to focus exclusively on the overcycling of the PCR because that dismisses and it limits the debate to where this malfeasance could occur. 02:00:27.840 --> 02:00:29.701 And it doesn't have to be with overcycling. 02:00:29.741 --> 02:00:36.166 It could be that there is a conflated background signal and all of these people wittingly or unwittingly took advantage of that. 02:00:37.253 --> 02:00:38.095 BAM! 02:00:38.195 --> 02:00:39.437 HOLY COW! 02:00:39.518 --> 02:00:42.203 I ACTUALLY SAID IT EXACTLY RIGHT! 02:00:44.167 --> 02:00:45.629 EXACTLY RIGHT! 02:00:49.198 --> 02:00:51.999 So how is the NIH director going to respond to that? 02:00:52.059 --> 02:00:55.800 I think we should play that back a little bit again, because it's that good. 02:00:56.100 --> 02:00:58.381 It's confusion with the positive signal. 02:00:58.421 --> 02:01:08.225 This is also why I believe it's dangerous to focus exclusively on the overcycling of the PCR, because that dismisses and it limits the debate. 02:01:08.985 --> 02:01:11.706 to where this malfeasance could occur. 02:01:11.746 --> 02:01:13.606 And it doesn't have to be with overcycling. 02:01:13.626 --> 02:01:21.988 It could be that there is a conflated background signal and all of these people, wittingly or unwittingly, took advantage of that. 02:01:22.208 --> 02:01:32.790 It's confusion, frustration, and doubt, but it is something that the precedence of the biology of coronaviruses before the pandemic is that they lamented that there wasn't a pan-coronavirus 02:01:33.686 --> 02:01:36.308 primer set so that they could just find them easier. 02:01:36.368 --> 02:01:49.838 That Mark von Ranzke has a paper from 2008 or 2009 where he is specifically trying to develop a pan-coronavirus vaccine and makes the argument that it's easy because there's so many homologous proteins. 02:01:50.439 --> 02:01:53.922 So there's a lot of precedence for the possibility and a lot of biological 02:01:54.795 --> 02:01:57.438 possibility there with regard to how much is homologous. 02:01:57.478 --> 02:02:02.744 And if they just pull the bait and switch, sometimes it could be really specific and other times it might not be. 02:02:03.324 --> 02:02:10.312 And I'm afraid we've lost this huge history of, of all of these EUA products, many of which are not even available anymore. 02:02:10.332 --> 02:02:11.053 They're totally gone. 02:02:11.093 --> 02:02:14.196 Just like, I mean, a lot of these sequencing labs are totally gone. 02:02:14.877 --> 02:02:15.077 Oh, 02:02:16.947 --> 02:02:24.018 Oh, and all were the purview of the FDA that these guys are in place to destroy right now, to blame it on the FDA. 02:02:24.178 --> 02:02:24.859 Oh, here it comes. 02:02:26.482 --> 02:02:30.047 And so it becomes very, very tricky now because... 02:02:31.708 --> 02:02:42.072 I feel like we have a lot of assumptions that we need to re-question, and I think that's what this lack of spread also has spurred me on to do. 02:02:42.112 --> 02:02:43.492 I'm sorry, there's no question there. 02:02:44.052 --> 02:02:44.813 No, don't worry. 02:02:45.313 --> 02:02:59.898 Actually, that is interesting, because I remember when Omicron came, the way that they originally diagnosed Omicron at scale versus Delta was that, now you please correct me, Jay, because you're the biologist, not me. 02:03:00.669 --> 02:03:02.491 So there, you're the biologist, not me. 02:03:02.731 --> 02:03:03.572 Oh, ships. 02:03:05.373 --> 02:03:09.176 And that's really important to hear him say, because let me get that back. 02:03:09.477 --> 02:03:10.898 Shoot, I hope we're close. 02:03:10.918 --> 02:03:15.822 There's no evidence of an RNA molecule that's capable of copying itself to this degree. 02:03:15.862 --> 02:03:19.325 We've never seen a background signal with this degree of fidelity before. 02:03:20.005 --> 02:03:22.888 So it begs the question of whether that was always there. 02:03:25.740 --> 02:03:30.005 So, a couple of notes, Anid, for what you said. 02:03:30.045 --> 02:03:35.691 So, one is... He was about to say a couple of notes I made, but he didn't make any notes. 02:03:35.731 --> 02:03:37.052 He wasn't writing anything down. 02:03:37.452 --> 02:03:40.676 It's a couple text messages he got on his side screen. 02:03:42.789 --> 02:03:47.593 It's not without precedent that there would be a test-demic, if you will. 02:03:48.373 --> 02:03:50.875 It has happened, even in the recent past. 02:03:51.656 --> 02:04:00.582 It was like 2008 in Dartmouth, there was a vaccine, coughing symptoms. 02:04:00.602 --> 02:04:04.325 The outbreak then was not actually pertussis. 02:04:05.106 --> 02:04:08.068 Correlation is like, okay, yeah, we were misdiagnosing this. 02:04:09.854 --> 02:04:13.216 disease spreading around, it was a false positive, pure false positive. 02:04:13.937 --> 02:04:24.263 And that the outbreak then was not actually pertussis, but people had panicked around this, you know, sort of dangerous disease spreading around because of the test. 02:04:25.724 --> 02:04:27.305 So I'm not saying that that's not possible. 02:04:27.385 --> 02:04:28.406 It certainly is possible. 02:04:29.403 --> 02:04:40.357 There, what happened was that people found out that the test was faulty, and so faulty that it, and then they go back and do a correlation. 02:04:40.417 --> 02:04:42.820 It's like, okay, yeah, we were misdiagnosing this. 02:04:44.473 --> 02:04:57.758 So, at the end of 2020, just to put an anecdotal data point on the field, at the end of 2020, the FDA had approved 226 different EUA test products. 02:04:58.558 --> 02:05:00.438 So, it wasn't one faulty test. 02:05:00.498 --> 02:05:04.680 There was a possibly over 200 tests with various 02:05:06.294 --> 02:05:07.215 faulty properties. 02:05:07.315 --> 02:05:08.916 Not all of them had to be false. 02:05:09.016 --> 02:05:13.078 I mean, you're the expert on the biology of this. 02:05:13.298 --> 02:05:16.340 I don't know how to speak to the RNA fidelity. 02:05:17.561 --> 02:05:27.928 But I will say, I don't think we've ever tested a virus spreading or a disease spreading at scale the way we tested this thing. 02:05:29.136 --> 02:05:41.575 huge just I mean unimaginable numbers of tests and not just tests but like genetic sequencing of the viruses and I wonder if we did this to every single virus what we would find. 02:05:42.768 --> 02:05:48.352 We probably haven't, not probably, we haven't looked like our systems, even for flu, for instance. 02:05:48.572 --> 02:05:54.976 The most abundant molecular entity in the human body and on earth are bacteriophages. 02:05:55.276 --> 02:06:00.980 They compromise a nearly endless, inestimable background of genetic signals. 02:06:02.423 --> 02:06:10.385 And they are probably a vital part of who we are as a biological entity, as a pattern integrity, as I'm going to try to teach over the next few months. 02:06:11.585 --> 02:06:14.426 This guy is not able to evaluate my biology. 02:06:14.446 --> 02:06:16.386 He's not even a biologist, according to him. 02:06:16.666 --> 02:06:18.046 Are these like sentinel labs? 02:06:18.747 --> 02:06:19.707 Very little sequencing. 02:06:19.727 --> 02:06:22.647 There's some sequencing, but not nearly as much. 02:06:23.068 --> 02:06:29.289 I want to throw one thing in there, just because I feel like it's something you might not be aware of, given the discussion we're having now. 02:06:30.650 --> 02:06:47.987 Prior to 2020, if you go back to all these papers where they're looking at coronaviruses, the main strategy using PCR was to target a 350 base pair amplicon of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, the most conserved region of the most vital 02:06:48.757 --> 02:07:05.328 protein in the viral genome and Indeed, but he has an MD and a PhD and something related to biology So for him to say he's not a biologist, but he's an MD PhD Who seeks the NIH position? 02:07:05.368 --> 02:07:15.555 He better frickin be a biologist You know you you can be a carpenter and just make really shitty things out of wood and you're still a carpenter and 02:07:16.783 --> 02:07:19.665 You know, I built the world's worst chicken coop. 02:07:20.146 --> 02:07:25.470 I still kind of understand something about using hammer and nails and screws and drills. 02:07:27.071 --> 02:07:33.136 So for him to say he's not a biologist is to like say, I don't, I don't, I've never picked up a drill. 02:07:33.396 --> 02:07:37.939 I've never tried to put a hammer and a nail and use it to connect two pieces. 02:07:37.959 --> 02:07:39.360 I don't know what that, how that works. 02:07:39.440 --> 02:07:41.322 I'm, I'm not a carpenter. 02:07:42.819 --> 02:07:44.561 I've never done any carpentry. 02:07:44.601 --> 02:07:46.263 I've never used a table saw. 02:07:46.683 --> 02:07:51.689 I haven't taken wood shop with Mr. Post in Cadotte, Wisconsin. 02:07:54.372 --> 02:08:03.722 You see, that's why when he says he's not a biologist, it's a pretty big red flag when he's talking to me because he's a professor at Stanford. 02:08:08.325 --> 02:08:23.881 And I'm a guy who lost his job as a faculty member of the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine and supposed to be his friend who he's known over the last couple of years as a fellow concerned citizen and a part of the movement called Broken Science Initiative. 02:08:23.981 --> 02:08:25.983 Think about how extraordinary that is. 02:08:28.425 --> 02:08:31.208 Depending on the country and depending on the 02:08:32.088 --> 02:08:38.376 The test you're looking at, there was an RNA-dependent polymerase amplicon. 02:08:38.396 --> 02:08:41.359 There was also an N-protein or an E-protein amplicon. 02:08:41.960 --> 02:08:48.368 The interesting thing about N and E are also, these are proteins that are relatively homologous across coronaviruses. 02:08:49.609 --> 02:09:01.554 One of the things that I think we have to somehow or another get all the way to the finish line is to resolve this idea that the PCR was specific enough to be used in the way it was used. 02:09:01.634 --> 02:09:05.215 And that's also part of this conflated background signal. 02:09:05.235 --> 02:09:11.578 If you were searching for RNA noise, and there's always RNA noise there, so you're going to get a certain percentage. 02:09:13.399 --> 02:09:14.800 of positive signal. 02:09:14.861 --> 02:09:23.489 This is also why I believe, this is before I understood where that RNA and DNA noise would have come from. 02:09:23.769 --> 02:09:30.115 I was still not understanding the breadth and the depth of Joshua Lederberg's vision for what an 02:09:31.136 --> 02:09:34.337 What a real individual was, a Joshua if you will. 02:09:34.737 --> 02:09:44.260 The real individual that you are is the compromise, the composition of all of the bacteria on your skin and in your microbiome inside of your body. 02:09:44.960 --> 02:09:47.621 The compost heap that you carry around in your guts. 02:09:48.061 --> 02:09:50.922 This is all one contiguous organism. 02:09:52.102 --> 02:09:59.544 It is an individual that I would like to argue might be called a Joshua or an Esther depending on whether you are a male or a female. 02:10:00.492 --> 02:10:14.802 And if you talk about your Joshua or your Esther in honor of Joshua and Esther Lederberg, you're talking about the whole pattern integrity, the most intricate symphony of 02:10:15.811 --> 02:10:25.616 symbiosis between both the cells of your own body and those of the bacteria that you are in symbiotic relationship with internally and externally. 02:10:26.136 --> 02:10:41.084 Endosymbionts and ectosymbionts, to borrow the words of, sorry, of Lynn Margulis and, you know, the real thinker behind these ideas. 02:10:42.073 --> 02:10:43.094 These aren't my ideas. 02:10:43.214 --> 02:10:46.416 These are just me being a biology student and a biology coach with you. 02:10:49.499 --> 02:11:00.107 It's dangerous to focus exclusively on the overcycling of the PCR because that dismisses and it limits the debate to where this malfeasance could occur. 02:11:00.147 --> 02:11:02.009 And it doesn't have to be with overcycling. 02:11:02.049 --> 02:11:08.594 It could be that there is a conflated background signal and all of these people, wittingly or unwittingly, took advantage of that. 02:11:10.585 --> 02:11:24.699 It's confusion, frustration, and doubt, but it is something that the precedence of the biology of coronaviruses before the pandemic is that they lamented that there wasn't a pan-coronavirus primer set so that they could just find them easier. 02:11:24.759 --> 02:11:28.583 That Mark von Ranzke has a paper from 2008 or 2009 where 02:11:30.825 --> 02:11:38.209 He is specifically trying to develop a pan-coronavirus vaccine and makes the argument that it's easy because there's so many homologous proteins. 02:11:38.830 --> 02:11:39.490 So there's a lot. 02:11:39.590 --> 02:11:42.812 In a way, I'm kind of doing what Kevin McKernan does to people. 02:11:42.852 --> 02:11:43.593 I'm doing it to him. 02:11:44.557 --> 02:11:51.827 I'm trying to bombard him with facts that he could check if he wanted to and that the readers and listeners can check if they want to and they're totally right. 02:11:52.307 --> 02:11:59.256 But what I'm trying to do is push him backwards a little bit on his heels to see how he tries to push backwards and what he does is remarkable. 02:11:59.336 --> 02:12:02.340 A lot of precedence for the possibility and a lot of biological 02:12:03.191 --> 02:12:05.833 possibility there with regard to how much is homologous. 02:12:05.873 --> 02:12:11.137 And if they just pull the bait and switch, sometimes it could be really specific and other times it might not be. 02:12:11.717 --> 02:12:18.682 And I'm afraid we've lost this huge history of all of these EUA products, many of which are not even available anymore. 02:12:18.722 --> 02:12:22.585 They're totally gone, just like, I mean, a lot of these sequencing labs are totally gone. 02:12:23.866 --> 02:12:27.429 And so it becomes very, very tricky now because 02:12:28.314 --> 02:12:35.141 we, I feel like we have a lot of assumptions that we need to re, re-question. 02:12:35.161 --> 02:12:39.465 And I think that's what this, you know, lack of spread also has spurred me on to do. 02:12:39.525 --> 02:12:40.906 I'm sorry, there's no question there. 02:12:41.446 --> 02:12:42.227 No, don't worry. 02:12:42.728 --> 02:12:45.951 Actually, that is interesting because I remember when Omicron came, 02:12:46.511 --> 02:13:15.215 the way that they originally diagnosed Omicron at scale versus Delta was that uh you know there's I get my now you please correct me uh Jay because you're you're the you're the biologist not me uh but I should really clip I I really should start my stream with that clip right there there was three primers that are used and you needed to have uh matching of all three primers to diagnose COVID uh no that's three primers unless you're talking about the probe but I mean 02:13:18.171 --> 02:13:31.301 This is the NIH director trying to explain the basics of a COVID PCR test, and he used the phrase three primers, not three amplicons, that each have two primers and a probe. 02:13:31.441 --> 02:13:36.285 No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. 02:13:36.345 --> 02:13:37.326 It's really unbelievable. 02:13:38.331 --> 02:13:40.132 diagnosed SARS-CoV-2 virus. 02:13:40.412 --> 02:13:45.035 When Omicron came, the problem was only two of the three primers matched Omicron. 02:13:45.595 --> 02:13:50.177 And so they inferred Omicron from matching just two of the three primers. 02:13:50.877 --> 02:13:55.720 I mean, you would fail a PhD exam if you use these words consistently wrong like this. 02:13:56.320 --> 02:13:57.381 The primers aren't there. 02:13:57.421 --> 02:13:59.041 The primers are in the reaction. 02:13:59.942 --> 02:14:02.123 The primers are amplifying an amplicon. 02:14:03.444 --> 02:14:11.616 The amplicon is supposedly a part of a larger sequence that represents a larger protein and the RNA for it. 02:14:11.656 --> 02:14:14.019 This guy can't, couldn't draw it on a whiteboard. 02:14:15.321 --> 02:14:17.164 And he is NIH director. 02:14:22.631 --> 02:14:23.952 Which strikes me as funny, right? 02:14:24.072 --> 02:14:29.115 And I hear your point about the existence of so many PCRs. 02:14:29.355 --> 02:14:35.078 I should say, for me, the cycling problem is such a huge problem. 02:14:35.318 --> 02:14:43.403 I take your point that there's... It is not such a huge problem if the whole test is not specific for a background signal. 02:14:44.924 --> 02:14:46.705 He's ignoring my argument. 02:14:47.628 --> 02:14:54.951 And then he pivots to reinforce their narrative that PCR overcycling actually is a problem. 02:14:55.371 --> 02:14:58.913 It's just a problem in addition to what you've just brought up. 02:15:00.573 --> 02:15:01.333 Stop lying. 02:15:02.454 --> 02:15:03.514 Holy cow. 02:15:04.635 --> 02:15:14.799 It's not sufficient for what you want, but for me, it was sufficient to make me wonder about the use of the testing the way they had it. 02:15:16.009 --> 02:15:19.390 No, because it doesn't make you ask the right question, Jay. 02:15:20.270 --> 02:15:20.950 Jayonta. 02:15:21.510 --> 02:15:28.491 Dr. Jayonta does not want to ask the real question, which is, is there something to find in the first place? 02:15:31.412 --> 02:15:36.093 He is still working under the presumption that there is something to find. 02:15:36.173 --> 02:15:44.034 It's only a question of whether the PCR, in any of its many forms, was sufficiently accurate to track it. 02:15:44.994 --> 02:15:57.183 which is very, very similar to what Kevin McKernan was arguing from the very beginning of his performance in 2020 with regard to objecting to the Corman-Jorston version of the WHO PCR test. 02:15:57.893 --> 02:16:09.481 Make sure that you argue about the details of the test so that the actual presumption that we need a test is never questioned, and in fact is reinforced by the presuppositions of the debate. 02:16:09.861 --> 02:16:11.442 That's exactly what he's doing here. 02:16:11.782 --> 02:16:15.385 We are not debating what I want to ask, which is, was there a need? 02:16:15.945 --> 02:16:19.887 Was there really something to test for, or were they lying about a background? 02:16:19.948 --> 02:16:20.108 No. 02:16:20.788 --> 02:16:28.730 There was definitely something to test for, and overcycling was the problem, even though I just explained to him why, that would be ridiculous. 02:16:30.450 --> 02:16:39.413 If you have, like I remember there was a Center for Evidence-Based Medicine report by Carl Hunnigan and Tom Jefferson on the cycling problem. 02:16:40.073 --> 02:16:49.335 And what they did was like a literature review, pretty high quality literature review, looking at... This is about baking cakes. 02:16:50.427 --> 02:16:58.774 This is about expertise in how PCR works and doesn't work, and how easily you can use it to show something is present or not present. 02:16:59.555 --> 02:17:18.871 And unfortunately for a lot of these posers, I have actually used quantitative PCR in single neurons to try and detect the presence of individual subunits, or the RNA, for individual nicotinic receptor subunits. 02:17:19.633 --> 02:17:20.954 That was my PhD work. 02:17:22.295 --> 02:17:25.518 So I know exactly the limitations of quantitative PCR. 02:17:25.538 --> 02:17:28.701 I know how easy it is to tweak up a false positive. 02:17:28.781 --> 02:17:36.088 I know how easy it is to overcycle and what overcycling does and doesn't do when there's something there or not there. 02:17:39.537 --> 02:17:41.978 This guy apparently doesn't have the requisite knowledge. 02:17:41.998 --> 02:17:44.779 He just has a given script and he is following it. 02:17:44.919 --> 02:17:48.640 And it is very obvious to me now in retrospect that he is doing that. 02:17:48.720 --> 02:17:53.641 There is no other explanation for what's going on because I'm not being obtuse here. 02:17:54.061 --> 02:18:00.803 I'm not inaccurately or I'm not being, I'm very clear. 02:18:02.023 --> 02:18:03.904 My questions, my comments are very clear. 02:18:04.542 --> 02:18:13.765 the correlation between the number of cycles you needed to get a positive signal and whether the original sample was infectious in vitro. 02:18:15.086 --> 02:18:28.171 And so the original thing being infectious was actually something else that none other than Kevin McKernan, the former research and development director for the Human Genome Project, acolyte of Mark Lander, 02:18:29.108 --> 02:18:39.197 And Francis Collins has been saying since the beginning of the pandemic, please listen carefully because this is script for word for word. 02:18:39.237 --> 02:18:49.527 What you see is this like just the correlation between the number of cycles you needed to get a positive signal and whether the original sample was infectious. 02:18:50.047 --> 02:18:52.928 See, we're not arguing about what infectious means. 02:18:52.968 --> 02:18:55.029 We're not arguing about those assays. 02:18:55.089 --> 02:19:02.471 We're actually accepting virology for what it is and all of the proxy tests that are easily undermined by the no virus people. 02:19:04.592 --> 02:19:09.714 And so we're walking this ridiculous fence line of a trap. 02:19:11.141 --> 02:19:21.576 Never actually trying to climb over the fence or look at what's on the other side, but just looking at what's in the middle of the trap and then over here and then turning around and turning around and we're never trying to get out. 02:19:25.601 --> 02:19:26.783 In vitro. 02:19:28.121 --> 02:19:36.105 And you know, what you see is this like, just this like, you know, 20 cycles, it's 100% in fact, 100% of the samples are infectious. 02:19:36.626 --> 02:19:38.807 By like 27 cycles, it's like 50. 02:19:39.587 --> 02:19:41.228 He's never done any of these experiments. 02:19:41.268 --> 02:19:44.350 He has no idea what he's talking about, but he has this script down. 02:19:45.530 --> 02:19:56.296 And he is very willing to accept that these papers are evidence of biological facts that earlier he said he's not in a position to evaluate because he's not the biologist, I am. 02:19:59.551 --> 02:20:12.004 But now he's very certain that these couple papers that Kevin McKernan and Jessica Rose and all these other people were out promoting are evidence that there is a novel virus that occasionally is infectious, but often isn't. 02:20:12.384 --> 02:20:14.886 And that also explains the asymptomatic spread. 02:20:15.227 --> 02:20:15.928 Stop lying! 02:20:19.523 --> 02:20:37.150 percent and by 30 cycles it's like you know pretty low by 40 cycles at zero right that has huge implications for the epidemiological policy and clinical use which is my my no it has it has nothing no no 02:20:38.710 --> 02:20:47.757 He is now making us assume that the PCR works, it finds something, and therefore it has political and socioeconomic implications. 02:20:47.897 --> 02:20:51.619 And that is just ignoring everything that I said. 02:20:55.084 --> 02:21:16.013 That should have it should have told people You don't you don't quarantine people if it takes 40 40 cycles to like find a positive In fact, you could have even done like look I didn't understand why people weren't doing this like they could have done if they're really serious They said they said they want to say okay is the virus replicating in the human 02:21:17.110 --> 02:21:24.976 Well, you could do a PCR test one day, and let's say it takes 30 cycles to be positive, and then the next day, it takes 26 cycles to be positive. 02:21:25.096 --> 02:21:32.722 Well, I mean, now you have some evidence that you have two to the fourth doublings that have happened, right, in the person. 02:21:32.742 --> 02:21:40.568 So you could have used serial PCRs, again, leaving aside the false positives, which we can talk about. 02:21:40.768 --> 02:21:48.635 So he's saying that why don't we use PCR to quantify the amount of virus and to watch it replicate and to see it replicate and to measure it replicating. 02:21:49.255 --> 02:22:02.246 But of course, he's not gonna get to the point to realize that that question could have been asked 20 years ago in 2002, when everybody was all up in arms about SARS and when all this funding began. 02:22:04.454 --> 02:22:05.335 It's interesting, right? 02:22:05.375 --> 02:22:16.546 Because there's no data like that from, for example, the enrichment of flu in Raoul, in Fauchier's lab in the Netherlands, or in the Japanese guy's lab at the University of Wisconsin in 2012. 02:22:17.847 --> 02:22:26.916 No actual measurement of the amount of virus in each successive ferret. 02:22:27.788 --> 02:22:33.331 No measurement of what changed in order to aerosolize the flu in Rotterdam in 2012. 02:22:34.231 --> 02:22:39.734 No detailed understanding of the dynamics of what goes on as that evolution occurs. 02:22:39.814 --> 02:22:42.256 No step-by-step mutation. 02:22:43.476 --> 02:22:48.759 Just anecdotal evidence that some of these ferrets are getting sick and they're only connected by a vent. 02:22:51.482 --> 02:23:00.828 And so once again, you have a very adept reinforcement of the scratch your head narrative because again, I'm not an expert in that stuff. 02:23:01.049 --> 02:23:02.810 I'm not in a position to question them. 02:23:03.250 --> 02:23:08.454 What I've heard is X, Y, and Z. And so there's no learning going on. 02:23:08.494 --> 02:23:10.515 There's no intentional discovery. 02:23:10.555 --> 02:23:11.896 There's no, you know what? 02:23:11.936 --> 02:23:12.637 I'm frustrated. 02:23:12.697 --> 02:23:16.139 I'm just gonna figure this out myself because I'm a Stanford professor, damn it. 02:23:24.506 --> 02:23:25.587 but you know more about than me. 02:23:26.608 --> 02:23:35.175 But like the serial false positive, like the serial test to like see with just the cyclings whether someone is actually becoming infectious or not. 02:23:36.436 --> 02:23:38.037 And so it's almost like he knows. 02:23:38.658 --> 02:23:40.740 It's almost like he can kind of see it. 02:23:40.780 --> 02:23:42.241 He can kind of follow along. 02:23:42.721 --> 02:23:47.906 And now he's asking questions that I guarantee as NIH director, he's never gonna ask again. 02:23:48.735 --> 02:23:57.299 use that information epidemiologically with recommendations to quarantine or not, whereas someone who's like 30 cycles, 30 cycles, 30 cycles, let them out of quarantine. 02:23:57.679 --> 02:23:58.560 There are students. 02:23:58.980 --> 02:24:05.423 But what would it mean if somebody was 30 cycles, 30 cycles, 30 cycles versus going from 8 to 12 to 22 to 30? 02:24:09.670 --> 02:24:14.012 You see, he's still arguing for the usefulness of PCR. 02:24:14.072 --> 02:24:18.774 He's still protecting the work of Kevin McKernan. 02:24:18.794 --> 02:24:31.679 He's still reinforcing and edifying the narrative that the PCR test can work in general, but you know, it all depends on how it's used and what it targets and the details are very complicated. 02:24:31.719 --> 02:24:36.041 I'm gonna leave it up to somebody like Kevin McKernan or maybe you because you're a biologist, I'm not. 02:24:37.241 --> 02:24:38.322 This is a cop-out. 02:24:39.386 --> 02:24:49.814 And it is by design because he doesn't want to attack the premise of the pandemic, which is that the PCR test picks up a novel virus that wasn't there before, but it was spreading now. 02:24:54.019 --> 02:25:01.320 at Stanford that were like athletes that were tested over and over again that were just positive all the time. 02:25:02.061 --> 02:25:05.441 Are you sure that there's not a time-lapse acute PCR paper? 02:25:05.461 --> 02:25:09.862 Because if there isn't, that's actually a really huge insight that you just made there. 02:25:10.602 --> 02:25:11.402 I haven't seen one. 02:25:11.942 --> 02:25:18.004 I mean, I made a case like this in a court document for a couple of places where I was an expert witness. 02:25:18.504 --> 02:25:18.984 Interesting. 02:25:19.824 --> 02:25:23.406 So he's made the argument before, but I bet you he's not making that argument anymore. 02:25:23.826 --> 02:25:36.233 I bet you as NIH director, he's never going to fund a grant application where they're going to definitively see if PCR is a legitimate way to track anything and how it's being tracked and what it's tracking. 02:25:37.585 --> 02:25:38.946 You know, because you could do that. 02:25:39.186 --> 02:25:54.239 You could set up a animal model with cages that are connected by air, and you could follow the evolution of a coronavirus from one mouse to another with all these high-fidelity sequencing tools that Kevin McKernan developed when he was in high school, but they're not doing it. 02:25:56.072 --> 02:25:57.933 Kevin McKernan's not arguing for it. 02:25:58.393 --> 02:26:02.876 Mr. Transfecting Plants for 16 years, Brian Hooker's not pointing that out. 02:26:03.576 --> 02:26:08.279 He's not pointing out that, yeah, well, Jonathan Cooley was right when he called the transfection when he still worked for seed. 02:26:08.399 --> 02:26:10.160 None of these people are doing that. 02:26:10.640 --> 02:26:15.023 And this guy, as NIH director, is playing the same game that the rest of them are. 02:26:16.584 --> 02:26:17.444 I guess we have to wait. 02:26:17.504 --> 02:26:19.045 The change is coming really soon. 02:26:19.245 --> 02:26:23.628 When Robert F. Kennedy gets around to it, or when this guy gets around to it, the change will happen. 02:26:24.744 --> 02:26:27.847 suggesting that this would be a reasonable use of the PCR test. 02:26:28.948 --> 02:26:33.772 But the lab folks on the other side were just very dismissive of me. 02:26:34.833 --> 02:26:36.014 My chat is correcting you. 02:26:36.054 --> 02:26:38.956 You're actually a biologist because you're also a professor of medicine. 02:26:39.337 --> 02:26:39.617 Sorry. 02:26:40.838 --> 02:26:44.201 Well, I mean, my background is fringe epidemiology and economics. 02:26:45.422 --> 02:26:49.386 Hey, so I want to do one more PCR thing just so that you have it on your radar. 02:26:50.306 --> 02:27:01.697 So in talking to the head of the PCR testing in Canada, that's the guy with the stutter that I talked to in a couple meetings, Zoom meetings, and he told me the truth. 02:27:03.058 --> 02:27:05.700 I don't remember his name off the top of my head. 02:27:05.840 --> 02:27:07.462 His name is Specter, I believe. 02:27:09.207 --> 02:27:10.691 to listen, I very much apologize. 02:27:12.556 --> 02:27:17.409 They did not use nested primers in Canada across the entire country. 02:27:18.443 --> 02:27:31.054 which which I and I just want to give you this for from the perspective of cocktail parties or anytime you get to talk to another academic biologist who insists that PCR is highly accurate like insanely accurate. 02:27:32.795 --> 02:27:41.202 It is very much my understanding that academic biologists are making this assumption that like they do 02:27:42.082 --> 02:27:46.586 There are positive and negative controls, both of which use nested primers. 02:27:46.886 --> 02:27:51.290 And in reality, none of the EUA products use nested primers. 02:27:52.012 --> 02:28:03.982 And none of the products that were approved in Canada were using nested primers, which makes it orders of magnitude easier to have a false positive, because remember, they're reading fluorescence. 02:28:04.662 --> 02:28:11.027 So with qPCR, I'm just going to say it in case you're not aware of it, but I'm assuming my listeners aren't. 02:28:11.588 --> 02:28:18.393 qPCR is a reaction that occurs with some kind of understood reaction dynamics. 02:28:18.834 --> 02:28:21.316 And those reaction dynamics can tell you 02:28:22.381 --> 02:28:25.083 a little bit about how well the PCR primers match. 02:28:25.664 --> 02:28:29.887 Because the better that they match, the more complete each cycle will be in doubling. 02:28:30.427 --> 02:28:37.093 If they don't match as well, then the doubling will not fit the exponential growth curve and it will be more linear. 02:28:37.533 --> 02:28:45.639 And that linear signal in any of these products that just goes on the fluorescence won't be visible to anybody that's reading them. 02:28:45.679 --> 02:28:51.224 And so a lot of these products almost have this built in possibility that if you're not 02:28:51.864 --> 02:28:56.208 Really trying to use them for accuracy, but you're trying to use them for mass measurement. 02:28:56.708 --> 02:29:20.428 It will go really terribly wrong And so I this is almost two years ago This is when I was still employed by CHD and a staff scientist working under Brian Hooker and Mary Holland I Was fired about a month later Maybe it was for this 02:29:23.011 --> 02:29:32.895 I've had a lot of conversations with my former academic colleagues where they're very surprised and actually completely incredulous that of course they use nested primers. 02:29:32.955 --> 02:29:35.936 And I'm sorry to disappoint you, but they didn't. 02:29:38.057 --> 02:29:50.402 I mean, I think from a policy point of view, I mean, actually just from a clinical point of view, let's say, like what I learned in medical school was that you should never 02:29:51.061 --> 02:29:54.323 treat a number or a test, you treat a patient. 02:29:54.943 --> 02:29:57.225 Like you want to have a full clinical picture. 02:29:57.405 --> 02:30:01.767 I mean, this guy's like somebody in the, what's his name? 02:30:03.728 --> 02:30:05.149 He's like Neo in the Matrix. 02:30:05.189 --> 02:30:08.731 He's just, he's like dodging all. 02:30:11.112 --> 02:30:12.413 It's crazy what he's doing. 02:30:12.453 --> 02:30:13.033 It's amazing. 02:30:14.174 --> 02:30:19.297 Picture before you make real decisions about what the right thing to do is. 02:30:21.481 --> 02:30:31.347 The epidemiologists that were like the architects of the policy, I think the way they were reasoning was, well, it doesn't matter if you get a false positive. 02:30:33.269 --> 02:30:34.870 What matters is a false negative. 02:30:35.730 --> 02:30:36.571 That's actually true. 02:30:36.611 --> 02:30:39.093 They probably did convince a lot of people with that argument. 02:30:39.193 --> 02:30:39.373 Yes. 02:30:41.181 --> 02:30:44.323 Yeah, and I think that that's, I mean- Which makes it more malevolent, right? 02:30:44.383 --> 02:30:57.472 It makes, again, the ease with which they could take advantage of an existing signal and distort it using social media into something else, maybe the evidence of an ongoing crisis, it's even easier now. 02:30:57.612 --> 02:31:01.335 And it's still not really sinking in to Dr. Jayanta. 02:31:01.835 --> 02:31:03.416 That's my best reading of what happened. 02:31:03.456 --> 02:31:07.980 Like they just said there was a virtue to minimize the false negatives to zero. 02:31:08.000 --> 02:31:10.662 And we've had false positives at scale. 02:31:10.722 --> 02:31:11.322 It doesn't matter. 02:31:11.342 --> 02:31:13.344 Nothing that we're doing. 02:31:13.644 --> 02:31:19.968 As far as they're concerned, none of the policies they were implementing were costly or harmful in any way that was worth taking into account. 02:31:21.449 --> 02:31:27.774 And so that's an interesting little little chat observation there. 02:31:27.814 --> 02:31:28.435 I like that one. 02:31:32.904 --> 02:31:39.309 If you impose it on somebody on a false basis of a false positive, that's not a big deal. 02:31:39.469 --> 02:31:40.069 It doesn't matter. 02:31:40.970 --> 02:31:49.496 Whereas if you have a false negative, well, that person might spread the disease to grandma and thinking that they're actually negative when they're actually positive. 02:31:51.037 --> 02:31:56.782 So, I think that that's really the underlying dynamic we saw here with all of the decisions. 02:31:56.802 --> 02:32:09.071 Because every single one of these decisions about testing is a, there's a lot of technical language, but the key thing is, what does it do to the sensitivity and specificity of the test? 02:32:09.372 --> 02:32:10.573 How should we interpret the test? 02:32:10.913 --> 02:32:12.234 What's the prevalence of the disease? 02:32:12.774 --> 02:32:13.175 These are like, 02:32:14.161 --> 02:32:34.518 basic epidemiological ideas that were just essentially tuned to create panic, tuned to create, you see each of these decisions dismissing the possibility of false positives, because the idea is like, well, it's just a virtue to have almost no false negatives. 02:32:36.004 --> 02:32:36.866 He's almost there. 02:32:36.926 --> 02:32:37.829 It's really remarkable. 02:32:37.869 --> 02:32:41.758 He almost says it, but he's not willing to do the whole thing. 02:32:41.778 --> 02:32:45.147 He's not willing to put it all on the whiteboard, which is remarkable. 02:32:46.400 --> 02:32:47.902 Yeah, that really makes a lot of sense. 02:32:47.962 --> 02:33:01.034 I didn't think I got him that far clarity that it sets to that too, because I always make this argument on my stream that so much can be done in a closed meeting to convince people to behave in concert. 02:33:01.635 --> 02:33:07.601 If you make them feel important that this is a national security question and we don't know what's going to happen and we need your help. 02:33:08.722 --> 02:33:15.525 There's lots of ways where I think people could have been influenced to kind of at least keep their head down for a while. 02:33:16.826 --> 02:33:23.349 And again, if you put your head up and you encountered what you encountered or what I encountered, then you probably kept your head down too. 02:33:25.511 --> 02:33:29.956 We have been talking for one hour and 46 minutes. 02:33:29.996 --> 02:33:31.657 I don't want to take too much more of your time. 02:33:32.358 --> 02:33:34.000 I want to say thank you. 02:33:34.160 --> 02:33:45.912 I want to give a shout out to Greg Glassman and Emily Kaplan of the Broken Science Initiative that serendipitously brought us together at their gatherings. 02:33:47.242 --> 02:33:48.983 I have them to thank you for your friendship. 02:33:49.263 --> 02:33:53.664 And I can't thank you enough for taking the time to argue with me and discuss this stuff with me. 02:33:53.704 --> 02:33:54.365 It has been great. 02:33:54.985 --> 02:33:59.546 Jay, I've learned a lot from you, not just from this podcast, but from over the whole last three years. 02:33:59.586 --> 02:34:00.767 I'm grateful for you as well, my friend. 02:34:01.287 --> 02:34:03.968 That's really way too much praise for me. 02:34:04.028 --> 02:34:05.008 Thank you very much, though. 02:34:06.129 --> 02:34:09.910 So I don't do this podcast for fun. 02:34:11.525 --> 02:34:17.747 I'm not calling my friend, Dr. Jayanta out for nothing. 02:34:18.987 --> 02:34:22.468 I'm calling him out because I think this is for the grandchildren of earth. 02:34:22.729 --> 02:34:29.191 I think that this is actually for my children's children that I'm doing this. 02:34:30.431 --> 02:34:32.412 And so it's okay to risk a friendship. 02:34:32.472 --> 02:34:39.634 It's okay to risk a high paying position or whatever I might've gotten had I played their game for the last few years. 02:34:40.888 --> 02:34:46.091 Maybe I could be like Emily Kopp or like Alex Washburn and I could get on some big podcasts. 02:34:48.373 --> 02:34:50.014 Maybe I could get on Tucker Carlson. 02:34:52.335 --> 02:34:58.339 But I don't think that this is about building a little dollar wealth for my kids. 02:34:58.479 --> 02:35:03.322 I think this is about what system that they inherit from me. 02:35:04.238 --> 02:35:14.861 what understanding of the world they inherit from me, what understanding of the adults that they are going to be surrounded by that they inherit from me that's the most important. 02:35:14.901 --> 02:35:26.584 And so I'm going to risk it all to make sure that my children understand how social media has been weaponized against us to put these false people in positions of power. 02:35:27.324 --> 02:35:33.626 Unwittingly or wittingly, it may just be that Jay Bhattacharya doesn't see any other way for him to win for his family. 02:35:35.151 --> 02:35:39.574 and that being offered something like NIH director is an impossible thing to turn down. 02:35:40.195 --> 02:35:42.637 I don't know, no one's ever offered me that job. 02:35:44.899 --> 02:35:53.425 But if I was told that I had to play along and that my kids would be safe and their kids would be safe, it would be a pretty tempting thing to believe. 02:35:59.730 --> 02:36:01.651 But I don't think it's the truth, ladies and gentlemen. 02:36:01.992 --> 02:36:03.072 You're welcome to come back. 02:36:06.084 --> 02:36:07.125 I'm very pessimistic. 02:36:07.165 --> 02:36:15.834 I think these people are on stage together and some of them are sticking to a script that they've been given by people like Robert Malone and Kevin McKernan. 02:36:16.114 --> 02:36:17.556 I think these are two of the 02:36:18.669 --> 02:36:40.022 the people that you need to most understand because they are playing these roles of narrative curation and absorption of whatever talking points that they can in order to stall and control where this narrative goes so that no one ever really usefully questions the vaccine schedule and the idea of intramuscular injection being dumb. 02:36:41.732 --> 02:36:43.153 I don't think they're ever going to stop. 02:36:43.333 --> 02:36:45.675 And I think that's what this slide is about. 02:36:46.736 --> 02:36:47.937 I used to live in the Netherlands. 02:36:47.977 --> 02:36:56.545 My wife is Dutch and I used to make fun of them because they don't seem to understand that Amsterdam is like three and a half meters under sea level. 02:36:57.065 --> 02:37:02.010 And that is by definition unsustainable because there is a crap ton of water on earth. 02:37:02.628 --> 02:37:06.930 And you can't hold it back with a bunch of dirt piles and diesel pumps. 02:37:07.570 --> 02:37:14.493 In fact, that's how the Netherlands exists right now, is the constant running of diesel pumps. 02:37:15.314 --> 02:37:21.376 And if it wasn't for the running of diesel pumps, Amsterdam and much of the Netherlands would be underwater. 02:37:21.937 --> 02:37:22.937 That's the reality. 02:37:24.038 --> 02:37:25.358 But the Dutch don't give a shit. 02:37:25.898 --> 02:37:29.300 Most of the people who live in Holland don't even think about that reality. 02:37:31.055 --> 02:37:42.338 But eventually, if it's 100 years from now or 400 years from now, that reality will no longer be sustainable with diesel pumps and dikes. 02:37:42.759 --> 02:37:43.559 It just won't happen. 02:37:44.779 --> 02:37:50.821 Eventually, that place is going to have to accept that it is under sea level and therefore should be underwater. 02:37:52.108 --> 02:38:16.588 And very much in the same way, I am suggesting to you that the ideas of Desjardins, like the noosphere and the ability to govern the entire Earth as one consciousness, to direct the evolution of the species as one species from a technocratic guidepost, is an illusion, a model. 02:38:16.989 --> 02:38:18.069 It is a project. 02:38:18.230 --> 02:38:20.972 It is a thing. 02:38:21.499 --> 02:38:24.202 that they are never going to abandon. 02:38:24.282 --> 02:38:37.614 Ray Kurzweiler is never going to stop selling the idea that just over the hill, every single disease is going to be cured and you're going to be able to upload your consciousness into a computer and live forever. 02:38:37.994 --> 02:38:39.756 He's never going to stop saying that. 02:38:39.776 --> 02:38:42.098 He's just going to keep kicking the can down the road. 02:38:45.049 --> 02:38:52.953 And nobody that is ever going to get elected in Holland is ever going to say, you know what, we got to turn off these pumps and let the water come in and deal with it. 02:38:56.815 --> 02:38:58.416 Because they all benefit from it. 02:39:00.256 --> 02:39:07.560 And it's not a perfect analogy, but ladies and gentlemen, these people can orchestrate and predict the societal failures. 02:39:07.620 --> 02:39:13.443 They can even tell you that it's Donald Trump is out of our control and his tariffs are going to bankrupt America. 02:39:14.016 --> 02:39:31.626 stop lying and they can tell you in unison and agree that that's the real issue that everybody should talk about and as long as pbs news hour and brett weinstein and tucker carlson all have guests on that agree that way then the vu the view is going to argue about it too 02:39:33.553 --> 02:39:37.734 And these are militarized social media representations. 02:39:38.274 --> 02:39:49.638 They are primarily composed of groups of liars supported by anonymous bots and sock puppets that create the effect of a Truman Show for everybody that wants to scroll. 02:39:51.578 --> 02:40:03.322 The illusion of consensus that is present on your phone is an illusion created by militarized social media representations of these ideas that will never allow you to escape. 02:40:04.485 --> 02:40:14.356 And one of the primary weapons is being used right now against a lot of the people on the right in America, if you use the slave speak and describe it as a two sides of a coin thing. 02:40:15.982 --> 02:40:18.203 is a fake anti-vax movement. 02:40:18.304 --> 02:40:31.392 That fake anti-vax movement is not saying that the only thing that they had before the pandemic and now is the ability to use synthetic recombinant genetics to make a lot of DNA or RNA. 02:40:31.892 --> 02:40:42.639 They are not explaining to you that the only thing they can actually do is make pure quantities of RNA and DNA and then use those in applications like transfection or transformation. 02:40:43.459 --> 02:41:01.051 And that there's this huge background of bacteriophages that is indescribably dense and part of a background that could very easily be misconstrued as a novel spreading pathogen if there was even an ounce of malevolence combined with greed on earth. 02:41:03.294 --> 02:41:20.625 And so PCR as a diagnostic is a fraud and our current director of the NIH does not seem to understand all of the nuance involved in this statement and why it's still true and why the FDA could go back and figure this out and enforce its mandate on it. 02:41:21.506 --> 02:41:23.147 These were all medical devices. 02:41:23.207 --> 02:41:26.009 They were all fraudulent and they remain fraudulent to today. 02:41:28.863 --> 02:41:36.114 Only thing they had to do was release a synthetic pure quantity and use PCR to claim to have found it. 02:41:36.174 --> 02:41:40.340 Maybe they even had an agent in Wuhan that had been paid for years to be ready for this. 02:41:41.874 --> 02:41:46.316 Ladies and gentlemen, nobody says it better than gigaohm biological transfection is a crime. 02:41:47.056 --> 02:41:58.441 And Brian Hooker could have told you that these investigational vaccines were transfections and transformations just like I tried to do and lost my job doing because he knew already in 2013 what they were. 02:41:58.821 --> 02:42:03.703 He already had 16 years experience transforming plants to produce medicine. 02:42:04.943 --> 02:42:11.666 Curiously, very parallel to what Kevin McKernan would like to do in the coming years with marijuana. 02:42:13.905 --> 02:42:19.007 Ladies and gentlemen, transfection was always a crime and they got away with it because they rolled out of a lot of placebos. 02:42:19.407 --> 02:42:29.570 It's probably the way that the current childhood vaccine schedule gets away with what it gets away with because there's a lot of placebos and placebos are really, really profitable. 02:42:31.450 --> 02:42:37.052 I mean, really profitable if you can sell vaccines and sell placebos and call them vaccines. 02:42:37.552 --> 02:42:39.333 Holy shit, can you make a lot of money? 02:42:42.059 --> 02:42:46.105 And it's funny, after everybody talks about all the money, nobody talks about how the money is made. 02:42:46.545 --> 02:42:49.049 Ladies and gentlemen, the biggest delusion is endemicity. 02:42:49.089 --> 02:42:51.232 Don't use this word, this is slave speak. 02:42:51.592 --> 02:42:53.976 This whole concept is slave speak. 02:42:53.996 --> 02:42:57.541 We're gonna get it out of Biology 101 with the new Biology 101, 02:42:58.911 --> 02:43:00.371 The journal club will be tomorrow. 02:43:00.431 --> 02:43:01.832 The lecture will be Thursday. 02:43:01.972 --> 02:43:04.992 Friday will be another interesting week summary. 02:43:05.452 --> 02:43:08.053 Ladies and gentlemen, RNA cannot pandemic. 02:43:08.213 --> 02:43:11.273 Nonspecific PTR tests are all the thing they need if there's a background. 02:43:11.673 --> 02:43:12.673 And there definitely is. 02:43:12.754 --> 02:43:14.254 Intramuscular injection is dumb. 02:43:14.674 --> 02:43:25.056 Transfecting healthy people is a crime in the population pyramids is a real problem that apparently the NIH director of America is not really well versed in its implications. 02:43:31.181 --> 02:43:32.788 Sorry if that was too loud for your ears. 02:43:32.888 --> 02:43:34.012 Thank you very much for joining me. 02:43:34.053 --> 02:43:34.796 I'll see you again soon.