WEBVTT 00:00.000 --> 00:02.000 . 00:30.000 --> 00:32.000 . 01:00.000 --> 01:05.000 . 01:05.000 --> 01:10.000 . 01:10.000 --> 01:15.000 . 01:15.000 --> 01:18.000 . 01:18.000 --> 01:21.000 . 01:21.000 --> 01:24.000 . 01:24.000 --> 01:27.000 . 01:27.000 --> 01:32.000 . 01:32.000 --> 01:37.000 . 01:37.000 --> 01:42.000 How can the good guys win? I think we got to learn the biology. 01:42.000 --> 01:47.000 . 01:47.000 --> 01:52.000 . 01:52.000 --> 01:57.000 I had my headphones off all day today. I need to adjust the quality. 01:57.000 --> 02:02.000 I apologize for this. A little bit over the top here. 02:02.000 --> 02:09.000 There we go. A little better there. 02:09.000 --> 02:14.000 . 02:14.000 --> 02:19.000 . 02:19.000 --> 02:24.000 . 02:24.000 --> 02:29.000 . 02:29.000 --> 02:34.000 . 02:34.000 --> 02:38.000 . 02:38.000 --> 02:43.000 . 02:43.000 --> 02:48.000 . 02:48.000 --> 02:53.000 I always used to think that Mark used a tonic cytos, so I was usually trying to figure out 02:53.000 --> 03:01.000 what kind of swelling or disease that was. I never understood that it was ITS as an end for really long time. 03:01.000 --> 03:05.000 I kept seeing cytos. On to time of cytos. 03:05.000 --> 03:08.000 I know it's dumb, but it's true. 03:08.000 --> 03:09.000 It's scheduled for six minutes. 03:09.000 --> 03:10.000 I never thought. 03:10.000 --> 03:11.000 You know. 03:11.000 --> 03:14.000 It's going on French, British, Italian... 03:14.000 --> 03:16.000 It's smooth, it's a Japanese television. 03:16.000 --> 03:17.000 I was just thinking... 03:17.000 --> 03:18.000 You've been everywhere. 03:18.000 --> 03:20.000 Some kind of swelling. 03:20.000 --> 03:22.000 It's embarrassing. 03:26.000 --> 03:28.000 But there's still one thing on top. 03:28.000 --> 03:30.000 What happened to the real mummy? 03:35.000 --> 03:38.000 He's doing some of the mummy. 03:38.000 --> 03:39.000 Ahhh! 03:39.000 --> 03:41.000 Oh, we're here! 03:41.000 --> 03:44.000 I found the mummy! 03:44.000 --> 03:49.000 Well, gang, I guess that wraps up the mystery and the mummy, too. 03:49.000 --> 03:51.000 Oh, we're here! 04:01.000 --> 04:03.000 I don't know if you're joking or not. 04:03.000 --> 04:06.000 Can we do a full episode of the Scooby Doo sometime? 04:06.000 --> 04:08.000 I'm not sure if you're serious. 04:08.000 --> 04:10.000 But yeah, eventually we're going to have to again. 04:10.000 --> 04:13.000 We haven't recapped the whole thing in a long time, 04:13.000 --> 04:15.000 so I do think it's probably a pretty good idea, 04:15.000 --> 04:20.000 but recapping that really means we're going back to immunology 101 04:20.000 --> 04:23.000 and then putting immunology 101 04:23.000 --> 04:25.000 where it was when we set it when. 04:25.000 --> 04:27.000 Because that's really what's important. 04:27.000 --> 04:31.000 Because what... 04:31.000 --> 04:34.000 What very few people got right from the very beginning, 04:34.000 --> 04:37.000 we actually did get right here. 04:37.000 --> 04:43.000 And that would be the immunology. 04:46.000 --> 04:51.000 I stand pretty solid on those rounds. 04:55.000 --> 04:58.000 I'm sure I'm the first person to have really, 04:58.000 --> 05:03.000 succinctly and yet in-depth enough capture 05:03.000 --> 05:07.000 the early coronavirus literature to the extent to it. 05:07.000 --> 05:12.000 You can see that T-cell immunity was understood to be paramount 05:12.000 --> 05:17.000 or primary in the response to that antibodies were irrelevant. 05:17.000 --> 05:20.000 And that proved true here again. 05:20.000 --> 05:23.000 But it's not a matter of what is true, 05:23.000 --> 05:25.000 but it's a matter of what's perceived to be true. 05:25.000 --> 05:29.000 And that's the reason why misleading the young about antibodies 05:29.000 --> 05:32.000 with Saturday Night Live and misleading our grandparents 05:32.000 --> 05:38.000 about immunology on the nightly news isn't cool. 05:38.000 --> 05:41.000 But right now we've gone beyond this. 05:41.000 --> 05:46.000 We're now really tricking people into accepting their slavery. 05:46.000 --> 05:49.000 Tricking people into... 05:49.000 --> 05:53.000 People aren't doing the work that's necessary to remember 05:53.000 --> 05:55.000 and learn and remember our history. 05:55.000 --> 05:57.000 We need to start doing that again. 05:57.000 --> 06:00.000 Or we won't get the power back from these challenges. 06:00.000 --> 06:02.000 That's for sure. 06:05.000 --> 06:07.000 I see the bricks in the back of the theater, 06:07.000 --> 06:10.000 and I think a lot of us here also. 06:23.000 --> 06:27.000 I have no responsibility for the current pandemic. 06:27.000 --> 06:31.000 I have no responsibility for the current pandemic. 06:31.000 --> 06:35.000 I have no responsibility for the current pandemic. 06:35.000 --> 06:39.000 I have no responsibility for the current pandemic. 06:39.000 --> 06:44.000 I have no responsibility for the current pandemic. 06:44.000 --> 06:48.000 I have no responsibility for the current pandemic. 06:48.000 --> 06:51.000 Stop lying! 06:51.000 --> 06:55.000 I have no responsibility for the current pandemic. 07:02.000 --> 07:04.000 Good evening ladies and gentlemen. 07:04.000 --> 07:09.000 This is Giga Home Biological High Resistance Low Noise Information Brief 07:09.000 --> 07:12.000 brought to you by a biologist the 9th of October, 07:12.000 --> 07:15.000 9th of October, 2023. 07:22.000 --> 07:25.000 Good evening. 07:25.000 --> 07:27.000 Welcome to the show. 07:27.000 --> 07:30.000 This is Giga Home Biological. 07:30.000 --> 07:33.000 It's getting cold back here in the garage. 07:33.000 --> 07:36.000 And so occasionally you may hear a heater fire up, 07:36.000 --> 07:40.000 which just sounds a little bit more like Starship background noise. 07:40.000 --> 07:43.000 But since we're not always going to be on the Starship, 07:43.000 --> 07:46.000 it's going to seem a little weird. 07:46.000 --> 07:49.000 Don't take the bait on TV and social media. 07:49.000 --> 07:51.000 It's getting pretty hard. 07:51.000 --> 07:55.000 I'm not going to speculate about anything to do with anything much farther 07:55.000 --> 08:00.000 than about 20 miles away from my house unless it has to do with biology. 08:00.000 --> 08:05.000 And since it's not much biology going out in the Middle East right now, 08:05.000 --> 08:08.000 I think I'm going to keep my mouth shut about that. 08:08.000 --> 08:12.000 Suffice it to say that I'm aware that things are getting hairy. 08:12.000 --> 08:18.000 I'm aware that we're going to be challenged in the coming months. 08:18.000 --> 08:20.000 That's for danger. 08:20.000 --> 08:23.000 And it's going to be nice to know that you've got family and friends 08:23.000 --> 08:26.000 and neighbors and people to count on. 08:26.000 --> 08:30.000 And if you don't, you know, maybe it's a good time to start thinking about 08:30.000 --> 08:33.000 reconnecting with those around you. 08:39.000 --> 08:45.000 The outside sounds that are behind me are actually 08:45.000 --> 08:47.000 just barely crickets out there. 08:47.000 --> 08:51.000 We had a couple of cold nights where they were silent. 08:51.000 --> 08:54.000 The Scooby-Doo is still on. 08:54.000 --> 08:57.000 And I still believe that a lot of these people have misled us 08:57.000 --> 09:00.000 from the very beginning about the worst-case scenario, 09:00.000 --> 09:04.000 and it's inevitable possibility in the future. 09:04.000 --> 09:08.000 I believe that they were involved in making sure that those windows 09:08.000 --> 09:11.000 of possibility stayed open in everyone's mind 09:11.000 --> 09:14.000 so that there was sufficient room for giant fear, 09:14.000 --> 09:17.000 giant uncertainty, giant doubt, 09:17.000 --> 09:21.000 and with an orchestrated presentation across social networks 09:21.000 --> 09:26.000 and across media, they were able to convince people of biology 09:26.000 --> 09:28.000 that doesn't really exist. 09:28.000 --> 09:32.000 And that is very different than saying that there aren't viruses. 09:32.000 --> 09:36.000 It's very different than saying that the PCR test doesn't work 09:36.000 --> 09:38.000 or something like that. 09:38.000 --> 09:42.000 We have a very well nuanced understanding of where we think 09:42.000 --> 09:44.000 our hypothesis is. 09:44.000 --> 09:45.000 So welcome to the show. 09:45.000 --> 09:46.000 If you haven't been here before, 09:46.000 --> 09:48.000 it's your first time finding us. 09:48.000 --> 09:53.000 It's going to be a little hard to jump in on this particular show 09:53.000 --> 09:56.000 because we're not going to really cover what we've been talking 09:56.000 --> 09:59.000 about with regard to what is perceived to be true and how 09:59.000 --> 10:02.000 what is perceived to be true has come to be. 10:02.000 --> 10:05.000 But if you are just joining us for the first time, 10:05.000 --> 10:08.000 suffice it to say that we've been working on a hypothesis 10:08.000 --> 10:15.000 where state actors and non-government organizations 10:15.000 --> 10:20.000 like maybe the WEF or SEPI or the WHO 10:20.000 --> 10:25.000 or other organizations that I'm sure lots of people can name 10:25.000 --> 10:32.000 have a stake in the idea that the entire globe or the population 10:32.000 --> 10:36.000 of the globe, the huge portion of the population of the globe 10:36.000 --> 10:40.000 across cultures, across national borders, 10:40.000 --> 10:45.000 takes on the mythology that in 2020 somewhere in the world 10:45.000 --> 10:50.000 originated an RNA sequence which was capable of infecting the world 10:50.000 --> 10:53.000 and changing the way that commerce is done, 10:53.000 --> 10:56.000 changing the way that we track goods and services, 10:56.000 --> 11:00.000 changing the way that we perceive our role, 11:00.000 --> 11:05.000 our place within mother nature on this planet. 11:05.000 --> 11:11.000 And so I would argue that almost everybody that we thought 11:11.000 --> 11:14.000 was a good guy trying to solve the puzzle, 11:14.000 --> 11:16.000 a good guy trying to solve the mystery, 11:16.000 --> 11:19.000 a good guy trying to save us from these bad people 11:19.000 --> 11:22.000 who are making profit off of this emergency 11:22.000 --> 11:27.000 were actually part of an elaborate theater 11:27.000 --> 11:30.000 designed to entice all of us, 11:30.000 --> 11:33.000 whether we were on the left or the right, 11:33.000 --> 11:37.000 whether we were progressive or conservative, 11:37.000 --> 11:41.000 to entice all of us into trying to solve this mystery 11:41.000 --> 11:44.000 of whether this was a lab leak or a natural virus 11:44.000 --> 11:46.000 and whether it was to blame on China or America 11:46.000 --> 11:49.000 or a combination of both or did they fund one another 11:49.000 --> 11:54.000 and somebody made a mistake or what happened and who's lying about it? 11:54.000 --> 11:57.000 And coming to the understanding that the lies were orchestrated, 11:57.000 --> 11:59.000 that the theater was orchestrated, 11:59.000 --> 12:02.000 that the email leaks were orchestrated, 12:02.000 --> 12:05.000 that the leaked Slack messages were orchestrated, 12:05.000 --> 12:11.000 and even the leaked grant proposals could have been orchestrated. 12:13.000 --> 12:16.000 It's even possible that a lot of the papers 12:16.000 --> 12:22.000 that are purported to be evidence for this pandemic potential 12:22.000 --> 12:27.000 and coronaviruses that exist primarily in three caves in China 12:27.000 --> 12:34.000 is actually also largely a potential created by those publications, 12:34.000 --> 12:39.000 which in reality are not some kind of, you know, 12:39.000 --> 12:44.000 bedrock of proof for the potential for a unique RNA sequence 12:44.000 --> 12:48.000 to be able to do something that most all other RNA sequences 12:48.000 --> 12:52.000 are nowhere, can even approach doing. 12:52.000 --> 12:55.000 But again, it's not what's a matter true, 12:55.000 --> 12:57.000 it's a matter of what's perceived to be true, 12:57.000 --> 13:01.000 and this illusion of consensus around the biology of RNA 13:01.000 --> 13:05.000 and the illusion of consensus around the biology of a pandemic, 13:05.000 --> 13:08.000 that yeah, of course there's these viruses. 13:08.000 --> 13:13.000 Of course, we can potentially make a virus that could kill more people 13:13.000 --> 13:17.000 than a nuclear weapon and could go around the world for three years, 13:17.000 --> 13:22.000 could be an incapacitating agent because of its super high infectivity, 13:22.000 --> 13:28.000 because we added five amino acids to the final sequence of the protein. 13:29.000 --> 13:31.000 And when we really think about this, 13:31.000 --> 13:38.000 when we really think about the idea that a fear and cleavage site, 13:38.000 --> 13:44.000 which actually whose functionality only manifests in the protein 13:44.000 --> 13:51.000 that it is encoding, could ever increase the fidelity of copying of the RNA. 13:51.000 --> 13:57.000 Because one of the reasons why a fear and cleavage site would potentially be so wonderful 13:57.000 --> 14:01.000 is that it would be reproduced and it would stay in the virus 14:01.000 --> 14:05.000 or stay in the swarm represented quite strongly 14:05.000 --> 14:08.000 for many, many, many, many, many subsequent infections, 14:08.000 --> 14:13.000 but as we've discussed, the quasi-species swarm doesn't allow for that, 14:13.000 --> 14:18.000 and as we have discussed, if this is not a functional part of the spike protein, 14:18.000 --> 14:23.000 which would greatly decrease the fitness of the virus progeny, 14:23.000 --> 14:27.000 then the presence or absence of the fear and cleavage site won't really matter that much, 14:27.000 --> 14:34.000 but the crazy part is, is that it won't change the fidelity of the copy procedure. 14:34.000 --> 14:37.000 And since it doesn't change the copying procedure, 14:37.000 --> 14:42.000 there's no reason to believe that because of a fear and cleavage site, 14:42.000 --> 14:46.000 pandemic potential would emerge. 14:46.000 --> 14:52.000 Because what people have confused with pandemic potential is fidelity. 14:52.000 --> 14:59.000 In order for what to have happened, according to all of these people who have almost all written books 14:59.000 --> 15:05.000 or made some kind of fame or fortune or comfort from the virus, 15:06.000 --> 15:16.000 have sold the idea that a particular RNA sequence is able to infect hundreds and hundreds of millions of people, 15:16.000 --> 15:20.000 and that it's highly trackable because of this fidelity. 15:20.000 --> 15:25.000 And this has never occurred before in the history, in the history, 15:25.000 --> 15:31.000 this has never occurred before in the history of RNA viruses. 15:31.000 --> 15:36.000 Now, some people will try to tell you the story that, well, we can sequence them so easy now, 15:36.000 --> 15:40.000 or we try it so hard now, that's why. 15:40.000 --> 15:51.000 But that's insufficient answer for what we understood before the pandemic with regard to variability of RNA replication 15:51.000 --> 15:56.000 and the fidelity of the, or lack of fidelity within the quasi-species swarm, 15:56.000 --> 16:01.000 or the quasi-species, I'm not sure really which term is correct. 16:01.000 --> 16:08.000 But that extreme variability that's present because of the thing that we've discussed a few times in a row now, 16:08.000 --> 16:16.000 the original genome is very quickly outweighed and replaced in the copy procedure 16:16.000 --> 16:27.000 by incomplete genomes, subgenomic gene RNA, and genomes with errors, genomes with changes. 16:27.000 --> 16:34.000 And so the idea that this single genome like Omicron gets copied over and over and over and over and over again, 16:34.000 --> 16:37.000 that's not real. 16:37.000 --> 16:43.000 Because at the very best case scenario, three changes are made every time there's a copy, 16:43.000 --> 16:49.000 and that copy doesn't just immediately get packed into a new virus and popped out. 16:49.000 --> 17:00.000 It floats around, and it's part of the growing amount of RNA that is interfering with this original RNA getting copied. 17:00.000 --> 17:06.000 And you can find countless papers discussing this phenomenon and how what it leads to, 17:06.000 --> 17:12.000 which is including recombination of coronaviruses with one another 17:12.000 --> 17:23.000 when the RNA-dependent polymerase drops from template to template when more than one template of a coronavirus is present. 17:23.000 --> 17:32.000 Ralph Beric and his co-author Ralph Denison have argued that as many as 35% of all the coronavirus is present 17:32.000 --> 17:40.000 in a co-infection, in a cell culture, are recombinant genomes. 17:41.000 --> 17:51.000 In some respects, that's mathematically very close to the recombinant, the frequency of recombination that's present in flu, 17:51.000 --> 18:04.000 although as you know, flu has a disjointed genome and so recombination is a different mechanism there. 18:04.000 --> 18:12.000 John Campbell and Angus Daglesch, I'm going to play it at 1.25, maybe 1.5. 18:12.000 --> 18:18.000 It's a really important interview to listen to because they talk a lot about immunology. 18:18.000 --> 18:26.000 The immunology is basically what we've been saying with some changes which, of course, could be completely correct. 18:26.000 --> 18:36.000 And so most of my plan is not to interrupt, but just to take notes and then maybe make a little summary at the end of what I took notes on, 18:36.000 --> 18:39.000 what I saw and what I'm going to look up or try to follow up on. 18:39.000 --> 18:51.000 I believe that this guy is a cancer dude, so he may talk about the genes, he may talk about T cells, he may talk about normal cancer 18:51.000 --> 19:00.000 and re-emergent cancer, I have no idea, I just know that a lot of people, I mean way more than normal, 19:00.000 --> 19:08.000 and then also Pamela sent me this video, so now I really have to watch it, and since I need to really know what I was going to do, 19:08.000 --> 19:13.000 this became the very easy choice. 19:13.000 --> 19:20.000 You're quite an important one, and I'm so pleased to welcome Professor Angus Dalglish, Professor Welcome, and thank you for coming. 19:20.000 --> 19:21.000 Thank you. 19:21.000 --> 19:26.000 Now Professor Dalglish is a professor at St George's University London. 19:26.000 --> 19:32.000 I'm not going to go through all of his qualifications, but he's a Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians in the UK and Australia. 19:32.000 --> 19:40.000 He's a Fellow of the Royal College of Pathologists, he's a Fellow of Medical Sciences as well as having an MD medical research degree. 19:40.000 --> 19:49.000 He's really quite impressive, and he's had 563 publications, I don't know how you fit that in one lifetime, but that's what he's had with over 25,000 citations. 19:49.000 --> 19:54.000 I believe Professor you're still working as a cancer doctor, you're a consultant oncologist. 19:54.000 --> 19:56.000 I am indeed, yes. 19:56.000 --> 20:02.000 Now, what's concerning you at the moment, there's some observations that you've been making that are concerning, 20:02.000 --> 20:06.000 just if you don't mind, tell us about your observations and what your concerns are. 20:06.000 --> 20:13.000 Well, I began to notice, I've been doing that onoma patients for over two decades and probably three. 20:13.000 --> 20:14.000 Can you hear that? 20:14.000 --> 20:19.000 He said melanoma in case you didn't hear that, it's a little tinny or something, I'll see if I can adjust this sound. 20:19.000 --> 20:24.000 Longer than I can think, and I started working with these patients because nobody else wanted to work with them, 20:24.000 --> 20:33.000 because they were very difficult, they didn't respond to chemotherapy, and so I was very interested in the history of immunotherapies working. 20:33.000 --> 20:38.000 So, I basically immersed myself in this and started doing the first cancer vaccines, 20:38.000 --> 20:44.000 first of all, collaboration with Don Morten of Cancer Vax and John Wayne Institute in California, 20:44.000 --> 20:49.000 and I was the only collaborator outside the US for a set of many years, 20:49.000 --> 20:53.000 and then I started working with a whole range of cancer vaccines, 20:53.000 --> 20:58.000 and the ones that I'm most interested in, the ones that have stood the test the time are actually the simplest, 20:58.000 --> 21:00.000 the heat-kill micomaterial ones, etc. 21:00.000 --> 21:05.000 So, while doing this work, I began to notice things that, you know, 21:05.000 --> 21:10.000 why did some people respond very well, and others not, I won't go into the details, 21:10.000 --> 21:16.000 but it was, the first thing was clearly it was a vitamin D, we suddenly realized we were dealing with endemic vitamin D deficiency, 21:16.000 --> 21:19.000 and if you corrected it, they started to respond better to immunotherapy, etc. 21:19.000 --> 21:24.000 So, I've had some patients on immunotherapy for several years, 21:24.000 --> 21:29.000 long before the new immunotherapies were approved, the hippielemies and the nillows and pembroves, etc. 21:29.000 --> 21:33.000 And I started to notice that some of these patients, they were coming up to, you know, 21:33.000 --> 21:38.000 they were over 10 years, 15 years, 20 years, they were suddenly relapsing, 21:38.000 --> 21:44.000 and they were presenting with relapse disease after years of not having any disease. 21:44.000 --> 21:50.000 Now, this was not unusual to me because I've seen it before, but I always wanted to know why. 21:50.000 --> 21:51.000 Of course. 21:51.000 --> 21:54.000 These are patients with malignant melanoma, malignant skin cancers. 21:54.000 --> 22:01.000 I noticed that the patients had relaxed before, they all had a history of reason of something which caused 22:01.000 --> 22:11.000 a significant period of immune suppression, such as, you know, a significant upset, bereavement, divorce, bankruptcy, etc. 22:11.000 --> 22:15.000 And I saw it, but there was an explanation for it. 22:15.000 --> 22:22.000 Now, more recently, I saw, I started to see it in more patients than I was used to in a short period of time. 22:22.000 --> 22:29.000 First of all, it was six patients I counted who all came and they'd had to have another lump out yet to investigate and found it, 22:29.000 --> 22:31.000 got relaps, etc. 22:31.000 --> 22:36.000 And I started to ask the question, you know, have you had bereavement, divorce, and certainly other? 22:36.000 --> 22:38.000 And then it, it tweaked. 22:38.000 --> 22:42.000 They'd all told me that they'd, they'd, I've had my booster, 22:42.000 --> 22:47.000 I've kept up to play with my boosters and it suddenly began to tweak because I was very against the booster program. 22:47.000 --> 22:49.000 I put it quite, quite basically. 22:49.000 --> 22:54.000 I've done over 30 years research into optimizing vaccines and immune response. 22:54.000 --> 23:01.000 And I, I came to the conclusion that the vaccines that they use are obsessed with antibodies. 23:01.000 --> 23:07.000 And I'm not, actually, I'm not interested in antibodies because it's the T cell response that you want. 23:07.000 --> 23:09.000 It is the innate T cell response. 23:09.000 --> 23:16.000 And as a cancer doctor, I noticed that the innate T cell response starts to decline at 55. 23:16.000 --> 23:20.000 And by 70, it's fairly much in your boots. It's gone down the big ski slope. 23:20.000 --> 23:29.000 But if you superimpose the rise of cancer treatments, it rises at the opposite rate, forming like a butterfly wing. 23:29.000 --> 23:32.000 So it started to last as a cause and effect. 23:32.000 --> 23:37.000 And then we found that we had an agent such as this, the new one we worked with for a long time, 23:37.000 --> 23:41.000 IMM 101, he killed, it really boosted the innate immune response. 23:41.000 --> 23:44.000 This is just a simple bacteria that's been killed and rejected. 23:44.000 --> 23:49.000 I mean, it's, it's the, it's the other end of BCG and it came out of BCG work. 23:49.000 --> 23:55.000 And it's very interesting is that BCG, it was found to boost the innate immune response. 23:55.000 --> 24:04.000 And here's the clue, if you give it more than twice, it basically starts to ruin the response and just boost sanding. 24:04.000 --> 24:07.000 So did this BCG was used to prevent tuberculosis? 24:07.000 --> 24:09.000 BCG vaccine tuberculosis. 24:09.000 --> 24:12.000 Now the heat kill micabacteria, they don't do this. 24:12.000 --> 24:15.000 If you keep giving them, they keep boosting the T cell response. 24:15.000 --> 24:20.000 They don't induce an antibody response. So that's kill mice and just boost sanding. 24:20.000 --> 24:23.000 So did this BCG was used to prevent tuberculosis? 24:23.000 --> 24:25.000 BCG vaccine tuberculosis. 24:25.000 --> 24:28.000 Now the heat kill micabacteria, they don't do this. 24:28.000 --> 24:31.000 If you keep giving them, they keep boosting the T cell response. 24:31.000 --> 24:33.000 They don't induce an antibody response. 24:33.000 --> 24:36.000 So as such, I thought this is a very useful agent. 24:36.000 --> 24:38.000 I've been doing clinical trials on it. 24:38.000 --> 24:50.000 And one of the things I did notice right at the beginning of the COVID was the patients are already telling me that, well, they're often their wife or husband would say, I don't know what it does for the cancer. 24:50.000 --> 24:54.000 But I've never seen them go through winters and not have colds of blues all the time. 24:54.000 --> 24:56.000 They seem absolutely fit. 24:56.000 --> 24:59.000 And then I realized this is the innate ingredient response. 24:59.000 --> 25:03.000 So I predicted this would be a very good frontline for COVID. 25:03.000 --> 25:07.000 And sure enough, it was at the height of the first wave where there's no vaccines mentioned. 25:07.000 --> 25:09.000 None of these patients call COVID. 25:09.000 --> 25:13.000 And yet their average age was all over 65 as the average. 25:13.000 --> 25:16.000 And they all were at risk as they had stage all melanoma. 25:16.000 --> 25:17.000 They had a full thing. 25:17.000 --> 25:18.000 None of them got ill. 25:18.000 --> 25:25.000 They might have had a very mild COVID where other people all around were going down very badly with COVID, mainly the staff. 25:25.000 --> 25:31.000 So these are people in your trial professor that were simply giving this microbacterial, very simple, killed bacteria vaccine. 25:31.000 --> 25:39.000 And even though it's a specific form of bacteria you were giving, it was stimulating an innate immune response that was working against a wide variety of different viruses. 25:39.000 --> 25:40.000 So you got it in one. 25:40.000 --> 25:42.000 So that was the environment I was in. 25:42.000 --> 25:45.000 And then we come up with the vaccine comes in. 25:45.000 --> 25:47.000 And as I said, I had a lot of experience in this. 25:47.000 --> 25:52.000 And I came to the conclusion, if you need to give more than two shots of vaccine, it doesn't work. 25:52.000 --> 25:54.000 That'll be one of my general rules of vaccine. 25:54.000 --> 25:56.000 And I think that's been proven to be absolutely right. 25:56.000 --> 25:58.000 They've been the mooseless and worse than mooseless. 25:58.000 --> 25:59.000 And they shouldn't. 25:59.000 --> 26:01.000 They should never have been given. 26:01.000 --> 26:07.000 If they were going to be considered, they should only be given to people who you knew their immune status. 26:07.000 --> 26:08.000 You should have mentioned it. 26:08.000 --> 26:10.000 I went on to a TV live debate with other doctors. 26:10.000 --> 26:17.000 And I said, why the hell would you give a booster to a vaccine that people have already had without measuring if the response was satisfactory? 26:17.000 --> 26:18.000 Because they might not need it. 26:18.000 --> 26:21.000 Because if they do not need it, you'll make things worse. 26:21.000 --> 26:25.000 And that was from the PCG example to name but one. 26:25.000 --> 26:28.000 So people just dismiss me. 26:28.000 --> 26:31.000 They wouldn't enter into proper debate about this. 26:31.000 --> 26:32.000 They said this is an emergency. 26:32.000 --> 26:33.000 No, it wasn't an emergency. 26:33.000 --> 26:39.000 Because the next thing I realized, especially when the people who had the boosters were actually often saying, 26:39.000 --> 26:42.000 well, I never had the COVID till I had the last booster. 26:42.000 --> 26:44.000 And it all sorts of clues like this. 26:44.000 --> 26:47.000 But it was in this group who were getting the relapses. 26:47.000 --> 26:50.000 They all mentioned they were having the boosters as if they'd done the right thing. 26:50.000 --> 26:53.000 And I suddenly explained, I thought it's the booster that's leading to the relapse. 26:53.000 --> 26:56.000 And as a scientist, I wanted to know what the reason for that is. 26:56.000 --> 27:00.000 Well, I know that you've only got a limited capacity in your immune system. 27:00.000 --> 27:08.000 If you boost with another vaccine to harness half the immune system to make antibodies 27:08.000 --> 27:13.000 to a virus that no longer exists on the planet, probably for one or even two years, 27:13.000 --> 27:14.000 you're going to weaken it. 27:14.000 --> 27:16.000 You're going to reduce the front line. 27:16.000 --> 27:19.000 And then we got the papers coming up that beautifully confirmed it. 27:19.000 --> 27:26.000 They showed that the booster, you no longer make ITG-1 and 3 neutralizing antibodies. 27:26.000 --> 27:28.000 You get a subtype switch to ITG-4. 27:28.000 --> 27:31.000 There's a very detailed, excellent paper showing this. 27:31.000 --> 27:35.000 Well, an ITG-4 subtype is the last one because it's more of a taller agenda. 27:35.000 --> 27:37.000 And it basically said, I don't have enough of this abuse. 27:37.000 --> 27:38.000 We're switching off. 27:38.000 --> 27:41.000 There's a salt on us with these agents. 27:41.000 --> 27:45.000 But it gets worse because it also suppresses the T-cell response. 27:45.000 --> 27:48.000 And there were some people who did a really nice study. 27:48.000 --> 27:53.000 I can't remember it offhand, but I actually presented it in the presentation I dig easily. 27:53.000 --> 27:58.000 The first group who showed that the T-cell response crashes after the booster in cancer patients. 27:58.000 --> 28:03.000 Whereas it's not perturbed in the first two, but the booster, 28:03.000 --> 28:06.000 these do a massive reduction in the T-cell response. 28:06.000 --> 28:08.000 Not in all of them, but in many of them. 28:08.000 --> 28:12.000 Well, to me, this was enough because we know, for immunotherapy, 28:12.000 --> 28:18.000 I knew from my work of home 20 years before we started using these checkpoint inhibitors, 28:18.000 --> 28:21.000 it'd be a demo, et cetera, that the T-cell controlled this disease 28:21.000 --> 28:24.000 because I only saw relapses when there was a reason for perturbation. 28:24.000 --> 28:28.000 Now we had a booster that was clearly causing perturbation, 28:28.000 --> 28:32.000 which if it was transient, I wouldn't mind, but it was a lot more than transient, 28:32.000 --> 28:35.000 especially when the patient said, well, I've had five vaccines. 28:35.000 --> 28:40.000 I mean, I was beginning to scream, what are they doing? 28:40.000 --> 28:41.000 What do I do? 28:41.000 --> 28:45.000 And I reported all this to various medians. 28:45.000 --> 28:47.000 I wrote it to, I wrote a paper to the people. 28:47.000 --> 28:50.000 Okay, let's take a break there because it was going fast. 28:50.000 --> 28:53.000 I'm sure for everybody. 28:53.000 --> 29:10.000 Let me just come back over here and grab a older PowerPoint presentation from 2021. 29:10.000 --> 29:16.000 And see if we can't just shed a little light on this. 29:16.000 --> 29:20.000 So here's a slide from 2021. 29:20.000 --> 29:31.000 And we talked about T-cells may offer lasting protection against COVID-19. 29:31.000 --> 29:33.000 This was July 28th, 2020. 29:33.000 --> 29:39.000 And I'd already been using this pretty much since August, I think of 2020. 29:39.000 --> 29:46.000 The reason why this was pretty dubious is because language in titles in science matters. 29:46.000 --> 29:51.000 And if anybody understands that Dr. Francis Collins does who wrote this blog. 29:51.000 --> 30:00.000 And in choosing the immune T-cells may offer lasting protection against COVID-19, 30:00.000 --> 30:03.000 he leaves the door open for maybe they don't. 30:03.000 --> 30:06.000 Maybe it's not T-cells. 30:06.000 --> 30:14.000 But of course, he knew already that in 2014, 30:14.000 --> 30:21.000 there was a paper about CDA T-cells providing substantial protection from lethal coronavirus 30:21.000 --> 30:24.000 disease done by none other than Stanley Pearlman, 30:24.000 --> 30:30.000 the preeminent expert of coronaviruses at Iowa in the United States, 30:30.000 --> 30:36.000 sitting on several committees, including the who advisory committee on coronavirus. 30:36.000 --> 30:40.000 And he would have known that in 2010, 30:40.000 --> 30:47.000 Stanley Pearlman demonstrated that T-cells responses are required, but antibodies aren't. 30:47.000 --> 30:52.000 Required. 30:52.000 --> 30:55.000 Required. 30:55.000 --> 31:02.000 So there would have been no reason based on the previous mountain of coronavirus biology 31:02.000 --> 31:05.000 in the literature to assume that T-cells weren't important, 31:05.000 --> 31:13.000 but to assume that they were the thing required. 31:13.000 --> 31:19.000 And of course, you and I learned that this is how the immune system works. 31:19.000 --> 31:23.000 The T-cells and their orchestration and all their different kinds, 31:23.000 --> 31:26.000 and all those different kinds, 31:26.000 --> 31:32.000 crescendo and decrescendo, the immune response, that's really how it works. 31:32.000 --> 31:35.000 B-cells are more puppets than anything else. 31:35.000 --> 31:40.000 And this is really unfortunate that this illusion, 31:40.000 --> 31:44.000 and it is an illusion of consensus that we don't know what's going on. 31:44.000 --> 31:51.000 We have no idea what will happen with this coronavirus, but they knew. 31:51.000 --> 31:58.000 Ten years before the pandemic, they already knew that virus-specific T-cells were vital. 32:02.000 --> 32:14.000 So we see this pretty cool super-fast revealing sort of lecture 32:14.000 --> 32:21.000 about how heat-killed mycobacterium is the best cancer vaccine out there. 32:21.000 --> 32:26.000 It originates in BCG work, which I don't know what BCG work is. 32:26.000 --> 32:27.000 We're going to have to do all kinds of stuff. 32:27.000 --> 32:29.000 I'm going to have to work really hard. 32:29.000 --> 32:32.000 I've got a lot of other things to do, too. 32:32.000 --> 32:37.000 He had identified a endemic vitamin D deficiency already long ago, 32:37.000 --> 32:41.000 and he already knew that this helped with people with this skin cancer 32:41.000 --> 32:44.000 that he's talking about, this melanoma. 32:44.000 --> 32:50.000 Relapse occurred often during stress or bereavement was the word he used several times, 32:50.000 --> 32:54.000 and that could be marriage or divorce or death in the family. 32:54.000 --> 32:59.000 And in the pandemic, he correlated relapse with the booster vaccine, 32:59.000 --> 33:05.000 and he didn't correlate it, repeat, he did not correlate a relapse 33:05.000 --> 33:09.000 with the first two shots, but now with the boosters. 33:09.000 --> 33:13.000 Now it would be interesting to know whether or not the majority of the people 33:13.000 --> 33:20.000 that he's calling boosted would have had AstraZeneca or Pfizer or Moderna, 33:20.000 --> 33:25.000 because in the UK is one of the few places where AstraZeneca was rolled out 33:25.000 --> 33:27.000 pretty widely. 33:27.000 --> 33:31.000 And so it's possible that these people are a very unique experiment 33:31.000 --> 33:37.000 where they had been first transformed to the spike and then transfected to the spike. 33:37.000 --> 33:38.000 Yee. 33:38.000 --> 33:43.000 No offense to if that's you. 33:43.000 --> 33:47.000 He's not at all interested in antibodies. 33:47.000 --> 33:49.000 That was a really cool. 33:49.000 --> 33:51.000 I don't think you can see my arrow, can you? 33:51.000 --> 33:53.000 You have to use this thing then. 33:53.000 --> 33:55.000 He's not interested at all in antibodies. 33:55.000 --> 33:57.000 That was a really nice statement for him to make. 33:57.000 --> 33:59.000 And he said, you know, the T cells do everything. 33:59.000 --> 34:01.000 That's really what we knew. 34:01.000 --> 34:09.000 But interestingly, he did say that he killed mycobacterium vaccine that is used to treat 34:09.000 --> 34:16.000 this melanoma in these patients can be used to repeatedly activate T cells. 34:16.000 --> 34:17.000 It can. 34:17.000 --> 34:20.000 These patients didn't get COVID. 34:20.000 --> 34:27.000 So when they were being treated with this, this heat activated, heat killed 34:27.000 --> 34:34.000 mycobacterium vaccine, which I guess is an activator for the immune system during this 34:34.000 --> 34:38.000 to treat cancer, also protected them from COVID. 34:38.000 --> 34:40.000 Interesting, right? 34:40.000 --> 34:45.000 So he argues that they should have known the immune status of people before boosting. 34:45.000 --> 34:47.000 Well, that's of course, that's of course true. 34:47.000 --> 34:51.000 And if they were infected, then they should have never gotten another vaccine again. 34:51.000 --> 34:53.000 That's also very true. 34:53.000 --> 34:55.000 But people are doing it. 34:55.000 --> 35:01.000 People are getting sicker because they're getting COVID or whatever it is that overlaps 35:01.000 --> 35:07.000 with the RNA that they're, that they're transfecting us to, the protein that they're 35:07.000 --> 35:09.000 transfecting us to. 35:09.000 --> 35:13.000 And I don't purport to understand it, but understand that there are a number of 35:13.000 --> 35:21.000 there's a 35:21.000 --> 35:24.000 sorry, I had to hear what was going on back there. 35:24.000 --> 35:31.000 There's a, there's a number of different mechanisms by which this could be going wrong. 35:31.000 --> 35:39.000 And so we just need to understand that as he said repeatedly, repeated exposure doesn't 35:39.000 --> 35:40.000 mean good. 35:40.000 --> 35:46.000 And when we were talking last night with Drew Weismann's lecture about how with 35:46.000 --> 35:51.000 mRNA in an LNP, we got 50 fold more antibodies. 35:51.000 --> 35:59.000 Well, if you, if you let this guy listen to that guy say we got 50 fold more antibodies, 35:59.000 --> 36:02.000 I think this professor would lose his mind. 36:02.000 --> 36:07.000 And he would like stop the whole prefer, he would hope he would stop the whole 36:07.000 --> 36:12.000 presentation and be like, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, wait. 36:12.000 --> 36:21.000 Hey, Drew Weismann, like, why do you think some antibodies good, more antibodies better? 36:21.000 --> 36:25.000 You know, truckloads of antibodies are, are, are fantastic. 36:25.000 --> 36:32.000 Why, why is that what, what, what biological evidence do you have that any 36:32.000 --> 36:38.000 homeostatic mechanism in a pattern integrity works like that? 36:38.000 --> 36:47.000 What, what enzymatic chain of proteins working together works better the more of one of 36:47.000 --> 36:49.000 those that you have. 36:49.000 --> 36:51.000 Because that's what an antibody is. 36:51.000 --> 36:58.000 It is a part of a system of signaling in the immune system. 36:58.000 --> 37:03.000 And having more and more and more of it will eventually lead to an imbalance that will be 37:03.000 --> 37:06.000 maladaptive. 37:06.000 --> 37:12.000 Having more and more cells in the immune system focused on that protein or that set of 37:12.000 --> 37:20.000 epitopes or whatever happens after that happens when you transfect someone cannot always be 37:20.000 --> 37:22.000 good. 37:22.000 --> 37:27.000 And if what happens is what Drew Weismann showed us in that talk yesterday, 37:27.000 --> 37:34.000 that your lymph nodes are completely full of cells that are transfected, we don't know 37:34.000 --> 37:41.000 how to transfect T cells usefully. 37:41.000 --> 37:49.000 And anyone claiming that we know how to transfect T cells usefully to augment the immune system 37:49.000 --> 37:55.000 without throwing off anything that it's doing that we're not aware of. 37:55.000 --> 37:57.000 Let me repeat that again. 37:57.000 --> 38:04.000 We're not capable of augmenting the immune system with the specificity with the tinkering 38:04.000 --> 38:11.000 accuracy to not accidentally mess with all the other things that the immune system has 38:11.000 --> 38:17.000 brought into balance in our lives. 38:17.000 --> 38:24.000 Ignoring the antigens on strawberries, ignoring the antigens on your favorite processed foods, 38:24.000 --> 38:32.000 ignoring the antigens present in your favorite box cereal, ignoring the antigens in your 38:32.000 --> 38:36.000 cleaning products. 38:36.000 --> 38:42.000 Your immune system works really, really hard if you don't have something wrong with your 38:42.000 --> 38:45.000 skin or you don't have something wrong with your gut. 38:45.000 --> 38:50.000 You've been doing very well and protecting it, very well and augmenting it. 38:50.000 --> 38:58.000 But most likely if you've lived in America your whole life, your immune system is a wreck. 38:58.000 --> 39:04.000 And it's really interesting what this guy says because it is this illusion that there's nothing 39:04.000 --> 39:09.000 to fix, that there's this illusion that there's nothing to bring back into balance. 39:09.000 --> 39:12.000 There's this illusion that there's nothing you can do. 39:12.000 --> 39:14.000 Just take the vaccine. 39:14.000 --> 39:20.000 When it might be better for you to lose weight to eat better, to stop drive-throughs, to stop 39:20.000 --> 39:26.000 eating out of a box or a bag, it might be better to do those things than it would be to 39:26.000 --> 39:35.000 transfect yourself because those things actually will usefully augment your immune system. 39:35.000 --> 39:37.000 And that's really the trick. 39:37.000 --> 39:42.000 He also pointed to the subtype switch to IG4 which suppresses the T cell response. 39:42.000 --> 39:44.000 He looked a little bit into that. 39:44.000 --> 39:48.000 It seems to be that the people on the other side of the argument want to tell you that 39:48.000 --> 39:50.000 IG4 does nothing. 39:50.000 --> 39:58.000 It's like a no functional FC portion of the antibody so it does nothing. 39:58.000 --> 40:06.000 But it's hard for me to really imagine that the immune system has developed IG4 as a way, 40:06.000 --> 40:12.000 IG4, excuse me, as a way of doing nothing. 40:12.000 --> 40:15.000 That seems to be quite wasteful. 40:15.000 --> 40:18.000 And so more than likely it does do something. 40:18.000 --> 40:24.000 And suppress the T cell response makes sense because the T cell response being suppressed 40:24.000 --> 40:32.000 by a smaller antibody, I don't know if it makes sense because it's a smaller antibody. 40:32.000 --> 40:39.000 It's because it, where it is in that progression that it seems to go from IgM to IgG, IgG1, 40:39.000 --> 40:41.000 3, IgG4. 40:41.000 --> 40:49.000 So if it is the one after repeated exposure, it does definitely make sense that it's tolerance. 40:49.000 --> 40:54.000 And the tolerance would be expressed by a T cell response that's dampened. 40:54.000 --> 41:00.000 Okay, I'm sorry, I just figured I had to say something. 41:00.000 --> 41:01.000 BMJ. 41:01.000 --> 41:06.000 I thought the BMJ had actually started to publicize things which are a little bit, you know, 41:06.000 --> 41:08.000 concerning to doctors rather than censor it. 41:08.000 --> 41:14.000 And basically I found, you know, I was the first in the UK to point out that the virus escaped 41:14.000 --> 41:15.000 from the lab. 41:15.000 --> 41:19.000 And to me it was completely obvious because it had inserts in it that one of them could 41:19.000 --> 41:23.000 occur naturally, not six or around the receptor binding site, no, that wasn't. 41:23.000 --> 41:26.000 And for my pains pointing this out, I thought this is brilliant. 41:26.000 --> 41:30.000 This is brilliant, we can challenge the nature of the sites. 41:30.000 --> 41:35.000 Every single general turned down papers pointing all this out saying it's not in the public 41:35.000 --> 41:36.000 interest. 41:36.000 --> 41:38.000 I mean, basically this was a normal one. 41:38.000 --> 41:46.000 Okay, so one possibility is that he is one of these many people who was right, that the 41:46.000 --> 41:51.000 sequence of the virus that was released is a sequence that indicates that it was a lab 41:51.000 --> 41:57.000 virus and that these extra things that they put in the protein of the spike protein into 41:57.000 --> 42:03.500 the protein that is the spike protein, these extra little things made it somehow possible 42:03.500 --> 42:10.280 for the RNA that encodes for it to circle the globe for three and a half years. 42:10.280 --> 42:13.280 That seems to be what he believes. 42:13.280 --> 42:17.800 And so we've got to be aware of where this guy's immunology is awesome and then where 42:17.800 --> 42:22.800 it's like, wait, do you understand what you're saying? 42:22.800 --> 42:31.440 And so the sequence that was released made it seem like it was a lab leak. 42:31.440 --> 42:38.040 Not all of the sequences, not all of the sequences, the sequence that was released at the beginning 42:38.040 --> 42:44.840 of the pandemic and how many of these inserts has he kept track of? 42:44.840 --> 42:49.640 How many of these inserts do we know are still there or not there? 42:49.640 --> 42:52.120 Who's keeping track of that? 42:52.120 --> 42:58.120 And if they are so important and yet so easy for someone to find, if they have the sequence 42:58.120 --> 43:02.800 of the virus, why in the hell aren't some of these people keeping track of these sequences 43:02.800 --> 43:10.520 so that we can sort of correlate their appearance or disappearance with the veracity of the infection, 43:10.520 --> 43:15.640 with the infectivity of the virus, with the gain of function attributes that must certainly 43:15.640 --> 43:25.800 be present if there's six of these things around the receptor binding domain of the virus. 43:25.800 --> 43:33.240 Well, the administrative truth has taken over. 43:33.240 --> 43:38.240 This is after you've had 563 previous papers published over a distinguished career. 43:38.240 --> 43:42.160 I can't think of a doctor who's more qualified than you offhand actually, so after a distinguished 43:42.160 --> 43:46.440 career and all this work, you could get published any more. 43:46.440 --> 43:53.360 Well, it's not actually the quantity that there's a quality issue, too, I would say. 43:53.360 --> 43:57.880 And I've never really wanted to publish things that were at least the time were irrelevant 43:57.880 --> 44:05.600 but to add to stories, I've had a lot of stories, I had a big presence in HIV and I discovered 44:05.600 --> 44:10.280 the receptor that it was the first author of colleagues doing it and that led to me being 44:10.280 --> 44:15.960 very recognised as a serious virologist and scientist, which to me was very surprising. 44:15.960 --> 44:21.000 I was at all the early HIV meetings and I've upped into people, I mean, after I was a guest 44:21.000 --> 44:25.560 at Bon Gallo and I had bumped into Fauci with Fabio and all the others and I thought, well, 44:25.560 --> 44:29.080 these guys really, at the field, was talking about publications, they were publishing in 44:29.080 --> 44:33.800 nature and science and they took three weeks in a bit to me and I was just lucky to get 44:33.840 --> 44:37.880 one or two in it, it just seemed to me that they were kind of god's must and it took me 44:37.880 --> 44:44.200 quite a while before I realised, actually, no, they're not, and I came to the conclusion 44:44.200 --> 44:48.320 and I was saying this because it's in my personal opinion that Fauci is not very bright. 44:48.320 --> 44:52.360 He thinks he is, he's a very good diplomat, he's actually not very bright because I pointed 44:52.360 --> 44:57.480 out that in sessions when he'd share that, is you'll never get the HIV vaccine if you 44:57.480 --> 45:03.160 use the entire envelope, the 3,000 antigens of it, you throw that as an antigen after 45:03.160 --> 45:10.440 the new response, it's going to pick out the dominant responses and the viruses evolve 45:10.440 --> 45:14.480 that the dominant responses will be against the bits of it, it doesn't give a damn about 45:14.480 --> 45:19.600 and I also predict is that it's a decoy, that their Achilles heel buys at the heart of 45:19.600 --> 45:25.080 this and by giving the whole envelope, you'll never allow the body to see the Achilles heel, 45:25.080 --> 45:28.240 we worked it out, I won't go into that but that's a big chunk of papers that I did which 45:28.240 --> 45:32.240 I have never got the recognition that they deserved, I thought they were far more important 45:32.240 --> 45:43.080 than the CD4 receptor but, I mean, I'm just going to rewind it and listen to what he said 45:43.080 --> 45:44.080 again. 45:44.080 --> 45:53.640 Look at that, is you'll never get the HIV vaccine if you use the entire envelope, there's 3,000 45:53.640 --> 45:59.280 antigens of it, you throw that as an antigen after the new response, it's going to pick 45:59.280 --> 46:05.760 out the dominant responses and the viruses evolve that the dominant responses will be 46:05.760 --> 46:09.920 against bits of it, it doesn't give a damn about that and I also predict is that it's 46:09.920 --> 46:16.200 a decoy, that their Achilles heel buys at the heart of this and by giving the whole envelope, 46:16.200 --> 46:20.000 you'll never allow the body to see the Achilles heel, we worked it out, I won't go into that 46:20.000 --> 46:23.880 but that's a big chunk of papers that I did which I have never got the recognition that 46:23.880 --> 46:28.360 they deserved, I thought they were far more important than the CD4 receptor but the wasn't 46:28.360 --> 46:30.760 like this. 46:30.760 --> 46:35.760 Those papers were far more important than they were given recognition for and this was far 46:35.760 --> 46:38.720 more important than the CD4 receptor. 46:38.720 --> 46:49.560 The CD4 receptor is supposedly how the HIV virus infects T cells and he said that the Achilles 46:49.560 --> 46:54.120 heel lies at the heart of this but I don't know what he meant if that meant the envelope 46:54.120 --> 47:08.600 protein or the heart of the HIV virus or what but I hear motivation, I hear an ego, 47:08.600 --> 47:12.800 I don't hear somebody who's trying to blow the whistle, I hear somebody who's more than 47:12.800 --> 47:18.760 trying to blow the whistle, he's trying to blow his own whistle, interesting. 47:18.760 --> 47:24.280 This led to me collaborating and my group with several people, we had a European collaborative 47:24.280 --> 47:29.680 group which we introduced lots of papers and showed that the virus never causes AIDS unless 47:29.680 --> 47:34.280 it activates the immune system first and whether it activates is determined entirely by your 47:34.280 --> 47:39.280 HIV type and those people who know it's sort of tissue genetics you've born with isn't 47:39.280 --> 47:40.280 it? 47:40.280 --> 47:41.280 Absolutely. 47:41.280 --> 47:57.000 He just said that it never causes AIDS in people, it all depends on their HLAs uptime. 47:57.000 --> 48:03.320 Never causes AIDS in people unless it activates their immune system and that depends on HLAs 48:03.320 --> 48:05.320 uptime, I think that's what he said. 48:05.320 --> 48:10.160 We introduced lots of papers and showed that the virus never causes AIDS, the best activates 48:10.160 --> 48:15.440 the immune system first and whether it activates is determined entirely by your HLAs type 48:15.440 --> 48:19.560 and those people who know it's sort of tissue genetics you've born with isn't it? 48:19.560 --> 48:20.560 Absolutely. 48:20.560 --> 48:26.040 Those people who had long-term infection and didn't seem to get ill, we predicted they 48:26.040 --> 48:30.520 must have a certain HIV type and one of the guys that worked with me was very hot on this 48:30.520 --> 48:37.360 actually predicted the HIV type early on from his computations and modelling and the modelling 48:37.360 --> 48:41.200 that's my colleagues and I didn't those days, unlikely people at Imperial College 48:41.200 --> 48:45.120 don't seem to model anything remotely correctly, this turned out to be very true because he 48:45.120 --> 48:51.120 predicted that HIV-8 people would get AIDS quickly and those with HIV-27 would get it 48:51.120 --> 48:56.760 very slowly if this Achilles heel was a bit dry with the disease and it was proven in 48:56.760 --> 49:02.200 a big MRC survey that those were the only two significant things, B-8 plus, B-27, they 49:02.200 --> 49:03.200 hardly get it. 49:03.560 --> 49:07.960 Based on the back of that I predicted, well, there's one group of chapsu that never gets 49:07.960 --> 49:11.680 AIDS however much virus you've given them, that's the chimpanzee, I reckon they must 49:11.680 --> 49:14.240 all be HLA B-27 or similar. 49:14.240 --> 49:18.600 It took five years to persuade that one of the people who had a large chimpanzee colony 49:18.600 --> 49:26.160 to do the HLA, if it were genetic immune codes and they were all HLA B-57 which is sort of 49:26.160 --> 49:31.440 a brother of B-27 so absolutely right and the only conclusion from that was they'd all 49:31.440 --> 49:37.000 been eliminated in the past in the wild by HIV, so you're dealing with a survival 49:37.000 --> 49:38.000 population. 49:38.000 --> 49:44.920 We had a big understanding of this and working with my Norwegian colleague who came up with 49:44.920 --> 49:50.120 the same idea, do not use the envelope, too much information, decoy, Achilles et cetera, 49:50.120 --> 49:54.600 he identified four Achilles heels, made them in peptides, asked me to join him because 49:54.600 --> 50:01.040 of immunological expertise and the HIV being in the HIV field, he did that very successful 50:01.040 --> 50:07.160 HIV vaccine, never achieved its primary goal in trials because the primary goal would 50:07.160 --> 50:11.000 be set wrong, had it not been set wrong, it probably would have been much more successful. 50:11.000 --> 50:16.080 We haven't given up, I think this is the best HIV vaccine, but what really got me about 50:16.080 --> 50:22.200 the establishment is that the gates are rescued, the MRC, MRC, they all ask you, and we put 50:22.200 --> 50:26.800 this proposal and said that the envelope vaccines will never ever work because this 50:26.800 --> 50:30.640 certainly will, but this already works, we've had it in humans and it reduces the virus 50:30.640 --> 50:32.040 learned very well. 50:32.040 --> 50:36.880 We want to just modify, optimize it, and we recommend that you be able to give this and 50:36.880 --> 50:40.960 take people off how the HIV trends were for months and months at a time, which should 50:40.960 --> 50:43.400 be tremendous for Africa. 50:43.400 --> 50:47.320 We were always rejected, it's a very clever idea, et cetera, et cetera, but we don't need 50:47.320 --> 50:51.600 a plan B at the moment because we've got a great big worldwide clinical trial and this 50:51.600 --> 50:53.600 looks like it will be positive. 50:54.600 --> 50:59.400 One, two, three, the third time, they still said it be positive, I mean, was it Einstein 50:59.400 --> 51:02.800 who said the definition of an idiot or somebody who keeps studying the same thing expecting 51:02.800 --> 51:03.800 a different answer? 51:03.800 --> 51:05.640 Sounds like the sort of thing he would say, yeah. 51:05.640 --> 51:08.480 So you have HIV vaccine, what is it actually target? 51:08.480 --> 51:13.600 It was targeting the, this is very relevant to COVID by the way, it targeted the nucleus, 51:13.600 --> 51:14.600 not the envelope. 51:14.600 --> 51:20.520 Right, so the proteins in the nucleus of the HIV, it ignored the envelope, we subsequently 51:20.520 --> 51:24.280 optimized it by adding in the one bit that drives the immune activation, which I had 51:24.280 --> 51:28.720 spent years identifying reality and it makes it seem better, so it really works well now. 51:28.720 --> 51:32.760 Now the thing that really annoys the nucleus is not a thing, so I'm not sure what he's 51:32.760 --> 51:33.760 talking about. 51:33.760 --> 51:40.120 Maybe it's the nucleocapsid protein, maybe HIV has a similar protein with a similar name, 51:40.120 --> 51:44.680 but even John Campbell seemed a little confused with the nucleus of what? 51:44.680 --> 51:47.440 This is unfortunate. 51:47.440 --> 51:53.240 It's an awful lot of sales pitch here, and it's a sales pitch for an HIV vaccine that 51:53.240 --> 52:03.960 has four Achilles heels, which are his cartoon version of an epitope or an antigen set. 52:03.960 --> 52:11.720 He seems to get those two things mixed up and antigen can have many epitopes. 52:11.720 --> 52:19.120 You should see it that way, because an epitope is really a very specific word, which describes 52:19.120 --> 52:25.000 the amino acid sequence that the immune system has encoded, either in a T cell receptor or 52:25.000 --> 52:34.520 has presented on MHC2 or has been encoded in a B cell receptor, i.e. antibody. 52:34.520 --> 52:41.080 So don't let that get mixed up for you, because that's something that everybody, when they're 52:41.080 --> 52:47.360 being imprecise gets mixed up, but an antigen is the protein in question. 52:47.360 --> 52:55.120 The antigen in the case of the cartoon transfection is the spike protein, or in the case of a 52:55.120 --> 52:59.080 more realistic transfection, it's a spike protein in whatever fragments are made from 52:59.080 --> 53:04.560 a fragment RNA, and whatever fragments are made when the protein is expressed correctly 53:04.560 --> 53:07.160 or bolded correctly. 53:07.160 --> 53:11.400 That's an antigen, and those antigens can have many epitopes on them, and it's up to 53:11.400 --> 53:16.320 your immune system to select the epitope from the spike protein that it will present to 53:16.320 --> 53:21.320 T cells that it will make antibodies potentially to. 53:21.320 --> 53:25.520 Because if you don't have B cells that recognize a particular part of the spike protein, then 53:25.520 --> 53:29.960 you're not going to have B cells that do that. 53:29.960 --> 53:33.960 So it's a predetermined thing already, and a lot of people don't understand that, that 53:33.960 --> 53:36.640 what you have is there. 53:36.640 --> 53:42.600 And until that B cell gets recruited and given T cell help, it's not going to evolve, it's 53:42.600 --> 53:49.080 genetic identity at all, it's just going to sit there dormant. 53:49.080 --> 53:54.560 So this guy seems to believe, and I correct me if I'm wrong in the chat, but this guy 53:54.560 --> 54:05.400 really seems to believe that two shots were okay. 54:05.400 --> 54:10.560 That seems to be a pretty crazy thing for me, for him to be saying right now, anybody 54:10.560 --> 54:16.360 is saying that the booster was the particular thing, and that no vaccine works if you need 54:16.360 --> 54:19.080 more than two. 54:19.080 --> 54:24.800 So he almost seems to be arguing that the mistake was the booster, and what are we on 54:24.800 --> 54:25.800 in America? 54:25.800 --> 54:27.040 Are we on our fourth or our fifth? 54:27.040 --> 54:31.320 This is a real interesting stance that he's taking here. 54:31.320 --> 54:36.760 I mean, was it Einstein who said the definition of an idiot or somebody who keeps studying 54:36.760 --> 54:38.320 the same thing expecting a different answer? 54:38.320 --> 54:40.440 Sounds like the sort of thing he would say. 54:40.440 --> 54:43.320 So you have HIV vaccine, what does this actually target? 54:43.320 --> 54:48.240 It was targeting the, this is very relevant to COVID by the way, it targeted the nucleus 54:48.240 --> 54:49.240 not the envelope. 54:49.240 --> 54:50.240 Right. 54:50.240 --> 54:54.800 So the proteins in the nucleus of the HIV, it ignored the envelope. 54:54.800 --> 54:58.480 We subsequently optimised it by adding in the one bit that drives the immune activation, 54:58.480 --> 55:03.280 which I have spent years identifying, we added the one bit that drives the immune activation, 55:03.280 --> 55:10.080 the one bit, and we, he's squeezing motion as we added in, we added in the one bit, the 55:10.080 --> 55:18.720 tell is this, darn it, I'm getting upset because this is not the accuracy, and this 55:18.720 --> 55:19.720 is not what I hoped it is. 55:19.720 --> 55:20.720 It makes it seem better. 55:20.720 --> 55:22.920 So it really works well now. 55:22.920 --> 55:27.920 Now, the thing that really annoys me was the, or we're talking people spending billions, 55:27.920 --> 55:33.000 I mean, how Genentech was involved in IH, the Gates Foundation, Garvey, IHavi, we approached 55:33.000 --> 55:35.600 them all, and they all brushed us off, we know what we're doing. 55:35.600 --> 55:39.680 And each of those big, he mentioned a lot of players, right? 55:39.760 --> 55:42.920 And each of those big, worldwide vaccine trials, it was the same thing being presented, just 55:42.920 --> 55:43.920 different technology. 55:43.920 --> 56:09.600 So it made me realise, do not fall for technology, now, listen to that, because this is what 56:09.600 --> 56:11.680 we hear all the time. 56:11.680 --> 56:16.320 And you know, 10 years ago, it was DNA vaccines, are they going to save the world, this sat in 56:16.320 --> 56:17.320 the other? 56:17.320 --> 56:22.400 They worked brilliantly in mice, and guinea pigs and things, and dogs. 56:22.400 --> 56:25.000 But as soon as you get bigger, the dogs, they do not work. 56:25.000 --> 56:26.960 These are the adeno virus vector. 56:26.960 --> 56:34.760 And so it, then everybody said, RNA is the thing, now don't think RNA is recent, I mean, 56:34.760 --> 56:35.760 this is the other thing. 56:35.840 --> 56:40.920 And when I was giving a thing, saying that I actually blame the RNA technology to make 56:40.920 --> 56:45.680 it the boosters even worse, and people were involved in them, say, the attitude was, well, 56:45.680 --> 56:48.600 what do you, you know, you need to be like what you're talking about, you want to stay 56:48.600 --> 56:55.280 technical, you know, I'm conscious, no, I mean, I sat on the scientific board by a company 56:55.280 --> 57:01.120 that called itself the messenger RNA cancer vaccine company for five years, I left six 57:01.120 --> 57:04.760 or seven years ago, and they had everything in place. 57:04.760 --> 57:07.160 I mean, they weren't able to take it forward. 57:07.160 --> 57:13.440 So the messenger RNA industry has been there waiting for an excuse for a long time. 57:13.440 --> 57:15.160 And I think that's correct. 57:15.160 --> 57:21.320 And he should have been waiting for an excuse to teach you that adenovirus DNA containing 57:21.320 --> 57:28.920 adenoviruses that work in lower animals are called transformations. 57:28.920 --> 57:36.040 And mRNA used in any carrier type form to express proteins in these lower animals has 57:36.040 --> 57:38.040 been called transfection. 57:38.040 --> 57:44.120 Now, I'm really happy with what he said there because it actually brings to mind something 57:44.120 --> 57:49.400 that I should have really pointed out a long time ago. 57:49.400 --> 57:58.320 And that is that we don't understand why it's so difficult to create genetically modified 57:58.960 --> 58:02.600 animals, but it is. 58:02.600 --> 58:07.280 It's easy to do it in mice relative to doing it in rats. 58:07.280 --> 58:13.080 And it's even more difficult to do it in monkeys than it ever would be to do it in rats. 58:13.080 --> 58:17.000 And I'm not even sure if it's possible to do it in monkeys yet. 58:17.000 --> 58:22.560 I would need to look maybe it's possible in some smaller monkeys. 58:22.560 --> 58:29.680 And it's not really clear why, but my guess is, is it's the lifetime of the animal. 58:29.680 --> 58:38.080 My guess is, is it's the lifetime of the pattern integrity that you are messing with. 58:38.080 --> 58:42.320 And you can remove the gene from a pattern integrity that's only going to last for, you 58:42.320 --> 58:49.120 know, like, only needs to last for 50 weeks. 58:49.120 --> 58:53.480 But if you remove a pattern integrity from something that whose developmental time course 58:53.480 --> 59:01.280 is a few years and whose productive lifetime is 20 years, then that the detrimental effects 59:01.280 --> 59:09.200 of removing one of these parts of the pattern integrity from it can have catastrophic consequences 59:09.200 --> 59:16.960 and that manifests itself in all kinds of weird anecdotal shoulder shrugs in academic 59:16.960 --> 59:17.960 science. 59:18.120 --> 59:20.480 Why don't you make a knockout monkey of that? 59:20.480 --> 59:23.760 Well, we can't make knockout monkeys. 59:23.760 --> 59:32.360 Why don't you take that gene and do what you did in that mouse in a better animal example? 59:32.360 --> 59:36.760 Well, because we can't, because a lot of the things that we can do in mice, we can't do 59:36.760 --> 59:37.760 in higher animals. 59:37.760 --> 59:42.640 And what he expressed here, which I was not aware of, but I took notes and I think we 59:42.640 --> 59:50.080 should follow up on this, is that adenovirus DNA transformation and the use of a DNA of 59:50.080 --> 01:00:00.600 adenovirus in animals up to dogs seems to work interesting, isn't it? 01:00:00.600 --> 01:00:05.360 Interesting that we know that much interesting that he knows that much. 01:00:05.360 --> 01:00:09.040 Not sure this is the gold mine that everybody thought it was, but it is a gold mine. 01:00:09.040 --> 01:00:14.720 It's a gold mine because you can now know why, well, I think we're learning. 01:00:14.720 --> 01:00:15.720 It's great. 01:00:15.720 --> 01:00:22.360 I like why it's, you know, it was the pandemic was the excuse that you suddenly to save 01:00:22.360 --> 01:00:23.360 the world, et cetera. 01:00:23.360 --> 01:00:29.240 This was the kind of thing, but when I go back to going to the patients who've relaxed 01:00:29.240 --> 01:00:34.280 and melanoma, they go back to that, I put it all down to the immune suppression caused 01:00:34.280 --> 01:00:35.280 by the boosters. 01:00:35.840 --> 01:00:40.080 But I've seen some later relapses, which is say, well, perhaps the immune suppression 01:00:40.080 --> 01:00:42.560 was recovered by now. 01:00:42.560 --> 01:00:48.400 And then you become aware of that this is where the irony comes in, is that the, to me, 01:00:48.400 --> 01:00:49.400 I was always suspicious. 01:00:49.400 --> 01:00:53.680 I saw all these reports and they were always pushed aside and many publications were pulled 01:00:53.680 --> 01:00:59.520 in the census, or well, in the censorship, by whatever it is, I don't know. 01:00:59.520 --> 01:01:01.920 But whatever it is, the census has been awful. 01:01:01.920 --> 01:01:04.400 But now there is enough data out there. 01:01:04.400 --> 01:01:11.560 There's enough people cried out that the quality control of messenger RNA viruses, which I believe 01:01:11.560 --> 01:01:12.560 was always the big issue. 01:01:12.560 --> 01:01:14.280 I mean, it was a big, big issue. 01:01:14.280 --> 01:01:15.280 That's not me. 01:01:15.280 --> 01:01:18.800 And you've seen all the, the quality of the vaccines, you know, the, there was a, for 01:01:18.800 --> 01:01:24.240 the first time, mainstream media, the article in spectator Australia actually went through 01:01:24.240 --> 01:01:28.800 well, not only is the quality controlled or for, but it's contaminated with DNA plasminced. 01:01:28.880 --> 01:01:34.480 One report up to 350 yard times with sequences from the SV40 promoter. 01:01:34.480 --> 01:01:41.160 Well, the SV40 is an oncogenic promoter used in cancer development in mice. 01:01:41.160 --> 01:01:46.160 And, you know, first of all, I say, what, hell is that doing in an RNA vaccine you have 01:01:46.160 --> 01:01:47.160 to ask? 01:01:47.160 --> 01:01:51.360 Because the presence of that, the presence of DNA means it can integrate. 01:01:51.360 --> 01:01:53.040 Surely, that's not possible. 01:01:53.040 --> 01:01:57.200 Well, you don't have to go very far into the literature to find people reporting that 01:01:57.200 --> 01:02:01.080 these spike proteins integrated into all sorts of different tissue. 01:02:01.080 --> 01:02:07.120 And for, you know, for rape, they said that it stays at the point of the injection site 01:02:07.120 --> 01:02:08.120 and there's no way it spreads. 01:02:08.120 --> 01:02:09.120 Oh, that's all right. 01:02:09.120 --> 01:02:11.960 And so this is turns out to be a complete life. 01:02:11.960 --> 01:02:12.960 It's been identified. 01:02:12.960 --> 01:02:13.960 It autopsies. 01:02:13.960 --> 01:02:14.960 It's been identified everywhere. 01:02:14.960 --> 01:02:17.920 And this is the other thing with patients. 01:02:17.920 --> 01:02:22.040 I can't get autopsies on these patients to prove this. 01:02:22.040 --> 01:02:23.240 It's quite incredible. 01:02:23.240 --> 01:02:30.520 But a colleague who had an explosive cancer, a co-erectal, basically at surgery, sent the 01:02:30.520 --> 01:02:37.280 places away, the pieces away, the tuses away, and spike messenger RNA from the vaccine insertion 01:02:37.280 --> 01:02:38.280 was confirmed. 01:02:38.280 --> 01:02:42.480 So it is, this is, this to me is quite frightening that this is occurring. 01:02:42.480 --> 01:02:46.400 And also that there's been this, we don't need to do post-moresomes on patients dying 01:02:46.400 --> 01:02:47.400 from this. 01:02:47.400 --> 01:02:50.680 It is, it's like it's from on high and they just won't do it. 01:02:50.680 --> 01:02:55.240 I pleaded for one on the patient who died from explosive melanoma, who said, I never 01:02:55.240 --> 01:03:00.280 felt well after the booster, I just felt chronically unwell and then the melanoma came 01:03:00.280 --> 01:03:01.280 exploding back. 01:03:01.280 --> 01:03:05.080 And then I had the patient's relatives consented to a post-mortem. 01:03:05.080 --> 01:03:06.080 Oh, yes. 01:03:06.080 --> 01:03:07.080 Oh, yes. 01:03:07.080 --> 01:03:08.080 So just a minute. 01:03:08.080 --> 01:03:09.080 You're one of the most senior doctors in the country. 01:03:09.080 --> 01:03:10.080 You wanted a post-mortem. 01:03:10.080 --> 01:03:13.280 The relatives are consented to a post-mortem, but that, that was refused. 01:03:13.280 --> 01:03:14.280 This is just unbelievable. 01:03:14.280 --> 01:03:15.280 It's over, yeah. 01:03:15.280 --> 01:03:16.280 Unbelievable. 01:03:16.280 --> 01:03:17.280 It is over by whom? 01:03:17.280 --> 01:03:22.480 Well, perhaps there's something to do with, there was a report which got into the Lancet 01:03:22.480 --> 01:03:27.280 of people who died after the vaccines to see whether it could, I don't know if you saw 01:03:27.280 --> 01:03:28.280 that. 01:03:28.280 --> 01:03:30.720 It appeared in the Lancet, but then it was pulled. 01:03:30.720 --> 01:03:32.880 It was pulled very quickly. 01:03:32.880 --> 01:03:37.640 The explanation given it was properly peer reviewed, which tells you there's not, peer 01:03:37.640 --> 01:03:38.640 review is over-embed. 01:03:38.640 --> 01:03:42.280 I mean, basically it's not politically within the political mantra. 01:03:42.280 --> 01:03:45.440 And this is what really, this is what really frightens me. 01:03:45.440 --> 01:03:50.400 I went to do an interview along these things, you know, into a mainstream media channel. 01:03:50.400 --> 01:03:53.240 And the guy warned me at the beginning, he says, I have to be very careful the way I 01:03:53.240 --> 01:03:54.240 ask you questions. 01:03:54.240 --> 01:03:55.240 And please don't be put off. 01:03:55.240 --> 01:03:57.240 I probably sound fairly hostile. 01:03:57.240 --> 01:04:00.080 I'm very happy to discuss facts or something, are they? 01:04:00.080 --> 01:04:05.800 But he said, the government had made it a crime to criticize the vaccine program on the media. 01:04:05.800 --> 01:04:11.200 And I said, I'm astonished but actually thinking about it, I'm not surprised because it explains 01:04:11.200 --> 01:04:13.240 why nothing, nothing is being discussed. 01:04:13.240 --> 01:04:17.480 Without someone in the mainstream media, they actually don't think I'll do it. 01:04:17.480 --> 01:04:23.920 And as you know, the off-con basically weighed it into Mark Stein on the GB News, but basically 01:04:23.920 --> 01:04:24.920 querying just that. 01:04:24.920 --> 01:04:28.320 I mean, it's the job of the press to raise the question. 01:04:28.320 --> 01:04:30.120 And that actually is my job. 01:04:30.120 --> 01:04:35.400 I mean, I was carpeted for saying this without proof that I'd actually have to present proof. 01:04:35.400 --> 01:04:38.520 Well, they won't let you get the proof, that's not. 01:04:38.520 --> 01:04:44.560 But based on this, one of the things that I did do, because I have been with many others, 01:04:44.560 --> 01:04:51.600 particularly Ross Jones and Clare Grant, we had written many, many lessons to the people 01:04:51.600 --> 01:04:55.040 who need to know about all these issues, particularly Ross and our children, which I 01:04:55.040 --> 01:04:56.040 do in 100%. 01:04:56.040 --> 01:04:58.960 I said, there's absolutely no need for a vaccine. 01:04:58.960 --> 01:05:03.600 This vaccine, actually, I said, for the beginning, they said only for people over 70 and they 01:05:03.600 --> 01:05:04.600 were about, they're ill. 01:05:04.680 --> 01:05:08.680 And when it came down to 4050, I said that, you know, there was no need for that, because 01:05:08.680 --> 01:05:11.400 we were getting this myocardis, parvitis signal. 01:05:11.400 --> 01:05:13.640 Why did they carry on persisting going down? 01:05:13.640 --> 01:05:16.480 Then you ate, that's another, another story. 01:05:16.480 --> 01:05:24.000 But we reported all this to people like Chris Whitty and the Department of Health, NHS, 01:05:24.000 --> 01:05:29.640 the MHRA, we basically got no engagement, which I think is an absolutely disgrace given 01:05:29.640 --> 01:05:31.600 the series of this on it. 01:05:32.160 --> 01:05:37.640 So I was told to say, haven't you been reported to the counter disinformation, which is set 01:05:37.640 --> 01:05:42.840 up by the government, the government, and it said, you can do if you go through this 01:05:42.840 --> 01:05:45.640 particular process, they've got to let you know. 01:05:45.640 --> 01:05:49.960 And I was told by somebody who had done all this and found that they had been reported 01:05:49.960 --> 01:05:50.960 for it. 01:05:50.960 --> 01:05:56.640 So I decided and went through this process, I mean, I suspect I have been reported more 01:05:56.640 --> 01:06:01.480 times than anybody else, because I started with a virus, I appeared, bang, bang, 01:06:01.480 --> 01:06:05.600 criticize in the virus, the origin of the virus, lockdown, bang, bang, as I said, lockdown 01:06:05.600 --> 01:06:06.600 was more ironic. 01:06:06.600 --> 01:06:09.800 And I said, you should never lock down when you haven't bothered to quarantine. 01:06:09.800 --> 01:06:12.360 And if quarantine doesn't work, there's no point locked down. 01:06:12.360 --> 01:06:15.720 And it never works for airborne diseases, I thought. 01:06:15.720 --> 01:06:21.760 And the, just as a cancer doctor, I said, you lock down the cancer, that death rate, 01:06:21.760 --> 01:06:26.320 in six to 12 months or two years, we go through the roof, because they won't be excremed 01:06:26.320 --> 01:06:27.320 in early treatment. 01:06:27.320 --> 01:06:31.080 And I pride ourselves, you were bloody good at that, then, but this lockdown, the collapse 01:06:31.080 --> 01:06:35.160 of the NHS has destroyed that, and it's really, really tragic. 01:06:35.160 --> 01:06:37.240 So that's pretty bad. 01:06:37.240 --> 01:06:46.800 Just let me write this down, whoops. 01:06:46.800 --> 01:06:55.320 Now, there's some contradictions here that I don't like, and they're contradictions that 01:06:55.320 --> 01:07:00.680 again, I think are part of this cognitive trap, that maybe he's weaving around John 01:07:00.680 --> 01:07:01.680 Campbell. 01:07:01.680 --> 01:07:06.000 I don't know, maybe he's just a really, he's a good guy, meaning well, but still fully 01:07:06.000 --> 01:07:09.000 trapped in the Scooby-Doo. 01:07:09.000 --> 01:07:15.800 But he definitely believes that the government, this is bad writing here, I had my armchair 01:07:15.800 --> 01:07:16.800 was bad. 01:07:16.800 --> 01:07:23.440 The government made it a crime to discuss the vaccine that was told to him by some journalist. 01:07:23.440 --> 01:07:26.760 And a mainstream journalist. 01:07:26.760 --> 01:07:29.760 And so he believes that that makes it somehow right. 01:07:29.760 --> 01:07:32.160 And so he also definitely, and that's the trick, right? 01:07:32.160 --> 01:07:38.720 The leaks, secret phone calls, special emails, ooh, a senator called me, a must being that 01:07:38.720 --> 01:07:42.800 I'm on to something, the senator told me I'm right. 01:07:42.800 --> 01:07:48.120 So he definitely believes that there's gained a function viruses that it was covered up, 01:07:48.120 --> 01:07:50.280 and that makes it even more believable. 01:07:50.280 --> 01:07:52.160 He believes the booster was a bad idea. 01:07:52.160 --> 01:07:58.200 He said more than three times that two, two shots make sense, but three thousand, that's 01:07:58.200 --> 01:08:04.720 when I knew it was crazy DNA contamination now it's come up recently in his discussion. 01:08:04.720 --> 01:08:11.160 And censorship has now reared its ugly head again, as part of the way that he was sure 01:08:11.160 --> 01:08:14.880 that something wasn't right, which I get. 01:08:14.880 --> 01:08:17.400 But we still have not mentioned protocols. 01:08:17.400 --> 01:08:22.100 Campbell hasn't mentioned Madazalam Campbell hasn't mentioned the things that 01:08:22.100 --> 01:08:28.220 were done in the homes in the UK, he hasn't mentioned one bit about it. 01:08:28.220 --> 01:08:32.860 Not one bit about PCR fraud, nothing. 01:08:32.860 --> 01:08:36.380 So that's pretty impressive. 01:08:36.380 --> 01:08:42.260 Anyway, he said that this is the part that really bothers me. 01:08:42.260 --> 01:08:44.220 He said that cancer would go through the roof. 01:08:44.220 --> 01:08:49.780 Sorry, I wanted to finish that. 01:08:49.780 --> 01:09:05.020 This is very bad because of lack of early screening. 01:09:05.020 --> 01:09:09.100 So that's not good because that's part of the narrative that a lot of people were laying 01:09:09.100 --> 01:09:13.300 down at the beginning of the pandemic, including the TV people. 01:09:13.300 --> 01:09:19.140 And if the TV people were laying this narrative down, then you know it's weird that he's doing 01:09:19.140 --> 01:09:25.620 it now, reminding you that it might not even be the shot that's bringing all this 01:09:25.620 --> 01:09:31.540 cancer out, but it's what it's the lack of early screening. 01:09:31.540 --> 01:09:36.940 And so we're starting to create this illusion now because he also mentioned SV 40 on the 01:09:36.940 --> 01:09:46.220 other page as being part of promoting cancer and he mentioned DNA integration. 01:09:46.220 --> 01:09:52.060 And so he says the booster did it, there's contamination and that it can integrate. 01:09:52.060 --> 01:09:56.660 But then he goes all the way back to the beginning of the pandemic and says because of lack 01:09:56.660 --> 01:10:01.220 of early screening, there's also going to be all this cancer. 01:10:01.220 --> 01:10:02.820 So which one is it? 01:10:02.820 --> 01:10:04.020 Is it both? 01:10:04.020 --> 01:10:05.940 You're not explaining it very well. 01:10:05.940 --> 01:10:11.300 And you have interspersed those two ideas with a whole bunch of sidebar about what you 01:10:11.300 --> 01:10:16.740 got cut out of and what people should have been paying attention to with regard to your 01:10:16.740 --> 01:10:18.740 research about HIV. 01:10:18.740 --> 01:10:21.700 Ooh, it's interesting. 01:10:21.700 --> 01:10:22.700 Wow. 01:10:22.700 --> 01:10:25.940 I did not expect this to be my evening tonight. 01:10:25.940 --> 01:10:32.340 I thought that I was going to have a pretty straightforward immunology stream. 01:10:32.340 --> 01:10:33.340 This is intriguing. 01:10:33.340 --> 01:10:40.460 That's really one of the things that I was, that one of our letters handed into Rudy 01:10:40.460 --> 01:10:46.180 Chris Whitty and everybody else, this that and the other, that this resulted in another 01:10:46.180 --> 01:10:49.940 complaint to the CDU about me the next day. 01:10:49.940 --> 01:10:51.420 Counter disinformation unit. 01:10:51.420 --> 01:10:53.980 So what the hell are they doing? 01:10:53.980 --> 01:10:57.820 As you say, I'm in a far, far better position than any of these people. 01:10:57.820 --> 01:11:05.580 I can't believe the complete, unbelievable, I got to choose my words very carefully. 01:11:05.580 --> 01:11:10.060 But to rely on Sage, you better, you get better information from the people running 01:11:10.060 --> 01:11:13.740 Battersea's Dokom, but they've put their infection control in my view. 01:11:13.740 --> 01:11:15.380 I mean, I just couldn't believe that. 01:11:15.380 --> 01:11:20.140 And Chris Whitty, I mean, I cannot believe the astupidity of the statements that he has 01:11:20.140 --> 01:11:21.140 made right from the beginning. 01:11:21.140 --> 01:11:24.940 We told him about vitamin D, you know, this, that, the other, and he came back, he had 01:11:24.940 --> 01:11:27.620 the contact and he says, there's not enough evidence to do anything about it. 01:11:27.620 --> 01:11:31.020 I mean, not enough evidence that is beyond belief. 01:11:31.020 --> 01:11:32.020 And then that's true. 01:11:32.020 --> 01:11:33.540 You know, when we challenge him, that's true. 01:11:33.540 --> 01:11:37.780 Jason M in the chat says that this may be the first time he's had to vent, that's, that's 01:11:37.780 --> 01:11:38.940 a legitimate thing. 01:11:38.940 --> 01:11:39.940 That's right. 01:11:39.940 --> 01:11:43.100 It could be the first time anybody's ever listened to him. 01:11:43.100 --> 01:11:47.100 So he's got to say something that that's possible. 01:11:47.100 --> 01:11:49.940 Who knows what I'll do when I get on Tucker Carlson, right? 01:11:49.940 --> 01:11:55.660 And he says, oh, you've got to vaccinate the children in order to protect the parents 01:11:55.660 --> 01:11:56.660 of grandparents. 01:11:56.660 --> 01:11:59.700 In that last sentence, he re-reals papers of stupidity. 01:11:59.700 --> 01:12:02.580 First of all, you don't vaccinate people to protect other people. 01:12:02.580 --> 01:12:04.180 That's the first thing you're wrong. 01:12:04.180 --> 01:12:08.260 And then by saying to protect the parents and the grandparents that already been subject 01:12:08.260 --> 01:12:12.100 to this vaccine battering, you've admitted it doesn't work. 01:12:12.100 --> 01:12:13.900 It's unbelievable. 01:12:13.900 --> 01:12:19.700 And so, I mean, I've got, I think Chris Whitty said one or two things that made a reasonable 01:12:19.700 --> 01:12:21.540 sense earlier on. 01:12:21.540 --> 01:12:26.180 He said, well, you can't really introduce vaccines unless nothing works. 01:12:26.180 --> 01:12:31.900 And the virus is really lethal, like it kills young people, the third of them, which is 01:12:31.900 --> 01:12:32.900 absolutely true. 01:12:32.900 --> 01:12:37.420 So why did the Allow Vaccine program to be rolled out for a disease that only killed 01:12:37.420 --> 01:12:41.860 old people, in my view, just bought for death by about three months and didn't actually 01:12:41.860 --> 01:12:48.300 kill anybody else any more than the random viruses, the flus, et cetera, do it. 01:12:48.300 --> 01:12:51.900 And I think, and I call them this, I think there has to be accountability, you know, 01:12:51.900 --> 01:12:55.460 that has to be this, um, hallett inquiry. 01:12:55.820 --> 01:12:57.540 See, but why won't he explain it? 01:12:57.540 --> 01:13:02.820 Why doesn't he explain that we can, and it might be that we just need to educate John 01:13:02.820 --> 01:13:03.820 Campbell. 01:13:03.820 --> 01:13:08.020 We need to educate this guy that the data is there. 01:13:08.020 --> 01:13:11.460 Denny Rancour, Denny Rancour has the data. 01:13:11.460 --> 01:13:16.900 He can show that the all-cause mortality doesn't support the spread of a respiratory virus. 01:13:16.900 --> 01:13:20.580 I don't care what he thinks. 01:13:20.580 --> 01:13:25.060 And he says the vaccine wasn't necessary unless like it killed the third of the people that 01:13:25.060 --> 01:13:31.980 had infected, but then think carefully, sir, about what they did. 01:13:31.980 --> 01:13:36.040 They rolled in all of the deaths that they could. 01:13:36.040 --> 01:13:43.500 They increased the deaths that they could by discouraging the use of antibiotics to tick 01:13:43.500 --> 01:13:52.340 a little bit here, discouraging the, the, uh, resuscitation of cardiac patients in New York 01:13:52.380 --> 01:13:58.980 and other places, encouraging the use of ventilators prematurely in order to stop spread before 01:13:58.980 --> 01:14:02.900 people needed ventilation. 01:14:02.900 --> 01:14:06.780 This, this is what they're missing. 01:14:06.780 --> 01:14:07.980 And they're right on the cusp. 01:14:07.980 --> 01:14:13.460 If they could just understand that, okay, now realize that you don't need a particularly 01:14:13.460 --> 01:14:14.620 dangerous virus. 01:14:14.620 --> 01:14:21.980 You need a particularly well-oiled machine capable of delivering this fear around the 01:14:21.980 --> 01:14:30.620 world at exactly the same time, with the exact same precision in met and messaging 01:14:30.620 --> 01:14:34.900 so that everybody stopped using antibiotics, so that everybody started ventilating, so 01:14:34.900 --> 01:14:40.780 that everybody panicked, so that everybody shut down. 01:14:40.780 --> 01:14:47.580 And the use of revdesivir, the use of medazolam, the use of all of these tricks resulted in 01:14:47.580 --> 01:14:55.940 more people dying in the hospital than should have and being tallied to COVID. 01:14:55.940 --> 01:15:03.500 If it didn't result in more all-cause mortality, it just means that there was enough deadwood 01:15:03.500 --> 01:15:12.020 from previous years so that it didn't raise the expectations, the expected age of death 01:15:12.020 --> 01:15:17.540 was actually higher in the pandemic. 01:15:17.540 --> 01:15:24.460 Because of the nature of that sort of top-heavy population pyramid that we had, they're talking 01:15:24.460 --> 01:15:29.740 about none of this, but we can get them there. 01:15:29.740 --> 01:15:34.980 The vaccine wasn't necessary, he knows it wasn't necessary, he knows it didn't work. 01:15:34.980 --> 01:15:39.900 But now, if he also has somebody in the government that says we can't run a vaccine unless A, 01:15:39.900 --> 01:15:46.620 B, and C, then he also could realize, it's possible he could realize. 01:15:46.620 --> 01:15:51.020 And John Campbell, therefore, could realize that wait, in order to get A, B, and C they 01:15:51.020 --> 01:15:55.700 might've done something, in order to get A, B, and C might've been the reason why the 01:15:55.700 --> 01:16:01.340 protocols were changed, in order to get A, B, and C, that might've been the reason why 01:16:01.340 --> 01:16:06.660 they use medazolam, John Campbell, in order to get A, B, and C that might've been the 01:16:06.660 --> 01:16:11.420 reason why they use revdesivir in America, John Campbell. 01:16:11.420 --> 01:16:16.460 In order to get A, B, and C that might've been the reason why they lied about what happened 01:16:16.460 --> 01:16:23.060 New York it actually should be feet to the line this was you were on it was in 01:16:23.060 --> 01:16:27.740 your watch your charge all this stuff now is because you didn't do things and I 01:16:27.740 --> 01:16:32.300 think why didn't witty resign why didn't balance resign they're all they're 01:16:32.300 --> 01:16:37.700 like hello all of this is also because of John Campbell who did nothing but 01:16:37.700 --> 01:16:41.060 encourage people to take the shot it's all because of him because he didn't 01:16:41.060 --> 01:16:47.700 get out there earlier where's his YouTube channel you see what I'm talking 01:16:47.700 --> 01:16:52.900 about here it's very easy to throw mud now but I'm what unless you're willing to 01:16:52.900 --> 01:16:58.500 say that you were also involved like I have been saying it repeatedly the 01:16:58.500 --> 01:17:05.660 lab leak the lab leak the lab leak was me for a couple months but I came to my 01:17:05.660 --> 01:17:20.420 senses in May of 2020 not in in in October of 2023 and there has to be some 01:17:20.420 --> 01:17:24.820 acknowledgement that if any of these people like John Campbell could have 01:17:24.820 --> 01:17:30.900 come to their senses in 2021 we could have avoided this in 2020 it would have 01:17:30.900 --> 01:17:38.660 been even better but then maybe he'd have just been thrown off a YouTube this 01:17:38.660 --> 01:17:43.380 is what we're dealing with right now this is how the the the narrative gets 01:17:43.380 --> 01:17:49.500 rolled up they've used this football has passed in the ball around the back because 01:17:49.500 --> 01:17:52.780 it can't be bothered to sort the female properly it just passed past they're 01:17:52.780 --> 01:17:57.060 blaming everybody else I mean I think it's a query is it's just a fast but a 01:17:57.060 --> 01:18:02.140 whitewash and by the time they come to any conclusions the people will go on 01:18:02.140 --> 01:18:05.300 for so long they'll have forgotten what it was all about and the people would be 01:18:05.300 --> 01:18:10.900 completely retired or dead or god knows this is all and I think they should be 01:18:10.900 --> 01:18:14.500 the people who should have intervened because they they were daily immune 01:18:14.500 --> 01:18:17.220 about things and if they didn't they should have got the right people didn't 01:18:17.220 --> 01:18:23.300 reside hmm go back to your patients professor with the melanoma there's 01:18:23.300 --> 01:18:27.700 this perturbation in the immune system now have you seen aggressive is the melanoma 01:18:27.700 --> 01:18:33.180 become more aggressive more sort of more virulent melanoma as a result of the 01:18:33.180 --> 01:18:37.820 perturbations which may well include the vaccine completely in fact it's my 01:18:37.820 --> 01:18:41.660 colleagues who came up with the saying we're seeing this too it's absolutely 01:18:41.660 --> 01:18:46.100 explosive they point this work explosive and my colorectal colleagues have seen 01:18:46.100 --> 01:18:50.300 this now they're talking about explosive presentations of colorectal cancer in 01:18:50.300 --> 01:18:53.460 young people particularly like they've never seen before can I just say that I 01:18:53.460 --> 01:18:57.940 wish you would stop saying explosive colorectal cancer I don't know why he has 01:18:57.940 --> 01:19:04.420 to keep saying that anyway it was one of those that the integration of the spike 01:19:04.420 --> 01:19:08.420 protein in their shoe it's almost like a new disease explosive colorectal cancer 01:19:08.420 --> 01:19:14.660 of the young yeah so they are presenting and it's already in the liver and the 01:19:14.660 --> 01:19:18.260 lymph nodes for the lungs whereas normally it's already metastasized yeah 01:19:18.260 --> 01:19:22.900 this is a process that when you put them under pressure it gradually escapes 01:19:22.900 --> 01:19:28.700 there's a slow process in most people explosive is extremely unusual and the 01:19:28.700 --> 01:19:35.180 colorectal surgeons are all reporting this now is have you seen any cases that you 01:19:35.180 --> 01:19:41.300 probably wouldn't expect of lymphoma cancer of the lymphatic system oh absolutely 01:19:41.300 --> 01:19:46.820 not I mean I don't do lymphomas in the clinic so that's the first thing but I'm 01:19:46.820 --> 01:19:51.380 hearing people who after their booster vaccines have gone down that with 01:19:51.380 --> 01:19:55.020 lumps in the neck and things like that and I found that a colleague worked 01:19:55.020 --> 01:19:59.180 somewhere else completely and I bumped into my eyes said you know how are you 01:19:59.180 --> 01:20:03.260 I said oh I'm okay but I've developed some lumps in my neck and they've been 01:20:03.260 --> 01:20:08.820 diagnosed as lymphoma and I just trying to be sympathetic so what earth calls 01:20:08.820 --> 01:20:13.100 that and the patient says oh apparently it's due to the vaccine might that's what 01:20:13.100 --> 01:20:17.260 my oncologist said and I said but this is the reaction I'll get it everywhere 01:20:17.260 --> 01:20:22.100 and yet when we report it higher up the chain we're told it's only going to 01:20:22.100 --> 01:20:27.300 shut up and not cause panic amongst the patient any rate that person told me 01:20:27.300 --> 01:20:33.060 that three of her friends out of the couple of dozen had all had the same 01:20:33.060 --> 01:20:37.260 thing it was quite amazing then I found somebody else lymphoma is not 01:20:37.260 --> 01:20:42.260 something that we're gonna test for very much but given the talk to we heard 01:20:42.260 --> 01:20:47.580 from Drew Weisman which was only like a year old yesterday where he said he was 01:20:47.580 --> 01:20:53.660 really excited about how easy it was to target the lymph nodes and again I said 01:20:53.660 --> 01:20:59.500 yesterday night and I'll say it again transfecting a bunch of T cells it just 01:20:59.500 --> 01:21:05.220 can't be the it can't be the goal of any therapy that's designed to use fully 01:21:05.220 --> 01:21:11.020 augment the immune system that just makes no sense I mean it really makes no 01:21:11.020 --> 01:21:19.300 sense that you could show those pictures to a room full of biologists and people 01:21:19.300 --> 01:21:25.860 wouldn't be like now my only my only claim here is that I wasn't in that room I 01:21:25.860 --> 01:21:30.580 wasn't around during a talk like that had I been around during a talk like that 01:21:30.580 --> 01:21:36.260 when I was in in academia still I would have said something I've done it many 01:21:36.260 --> 01:21:48.140 times and in that case that is just absurd it is absolutely absurd that you 01:21:48.140 --> 01:21:55.020 can show a glow-in-the-dark staining lymph node and say look what we can do 01:21:55.980 --> 01:22:01.340 and that's a good idea show up a section of Baron Mabone marrow and say look 01:22:01.340 --> 01:22:08.300 what we can do as if that's a good idea as if that is a useful way to augment the 01:22:08.300 --> 01:22:16.580 immune system now you can make a little mouse model that has one readout or three 01:22:16.580 --> 01:22:22.020 readouts that can all be translated into a bar graph and show that the changes in 01:22:22.020 --> 01:22:27.540 those readouts are in the general direction of a therapeutic that might 01:22:27.540 --> 01:22:32.580 be useful but in a mouse that doesn't mean anything because we can make knockout 01:22:32.580 --> 01:22:40.420 mice because we can make transgenic mice we can make pre-driven genetic 01:22:40.420 --> 01:22:47.780 altered mice we can't do that with most other mammals 01:22:48.540 --> 01:22:56.700 we're talking about genetic mice you know genetically inbred mice you can't 01:22:56.700 --> 01:23:04.300 genetically in breed humans I just don't know what to say ladies and gentlemen 01:23:04.300 --> 01:23:10.060 but we're dealing with something here where there is an illusion most of the 01:23:10.060 --> 01:23:19.540 people who mean well are still under its spell I was only able to to start to 01:23:19.540 --> 01:23:24.580 become aware of this illusion a few years ago it's not like I knew what this was 01:23:24.580 --> 01:23:30.980 the pandemic saved me it probably saved a lot of you and now we need to use the 01:23:30.980 --> 01:23:35.860 pandemic to save these guys because they're there they're on their way out of the 01:23:35.900 --> 01:23:40.980 cave they know that something is wrong they shouldn't see these kinds of 01:23:40.980 --> 01:23:44.220 cancers they shouldn't see it in this frequency they shouldn't see it in this 01:23:44.220 --> 01:23:49.780 young and there shouldn't be a temporal correlation with a particular therapeutic 01:23:49.780 --> 01:23:56.420 exposure but it is there is a temporal correlation with a therapeutic exposure 01:23:56.420 --> 01:24:04.860 to a vaccine candidate transfection that the maker itself was bragging about not 01:24:04.900 --> 01:24:10.380 ten months ago about how these preparations of lipid nanoparticles and 01:24:10.380 --> 01:24:18.300 mRNA are very easily targeted to the lymph node to the bone marrow they go 01:24:18.300 --> 01:24:28.620 all over the body locally and had a lymphoma diagnosis then I found my a 01:24:29.100 --> 01:24:34.060 close member of the family developed a leukemia and that was after the booster 01:24:34.060 --> 01:24:39.820 vaccine now here I want to point out that quite a few people especially my 01:24:39.820 --> 01:24:47.820 agent etc probably have low-grade B cell disease lymphomas leukemias 01:24:47.820 --> 01:24:53.780 etc my lomas and yes and it's maintained under control because it was a good 01:24:53.780 --> 01:24:59.180 healthy T cell surveillance it keeps it under control so when you give a booster 01:24:59.180 --> 01:25:03.540 and you start to find these B cell hemias and things coming more common you 01:25:03.540 --> 01:25:06.940 don't have to look hard to work out what the packet genesis is I why they 01:25:06.940 --> 01:25:11.460 suddenly appear but my other colleagues are pointing out that they're seeing 01:25:11.460 --> 01:25:16.180 more renal cancer too a lot more renal cancer now renal cancer in my loma 01:25:16.180 --> 01:25:20.340 we're always loved together as being tumors that seem to respond to immune 01:25:20.420 --> 01:25:25.380 therapy but you know they were both both the ones that responded to interferon 01:25:25.380 --> 01:25:29.860 and interlinked to you before we had specific therapy so that again would 01:25:29.860 --> 01:25:36.260 fit the T cell perturbation control theory and are we talking about what 01:25:36.260 --> 01:25:40.700 sorts of leukemia is potentially are we talking about here well B cell ones so 01:25:40.700 --> 01:25:44.460 I mean one of the ones specifically had its array of subtypes called 01:25:44.460 --> 01:25:50.500 mandrel cell that all fits into the more chronic remind me please is that 01:25:50.500 --> 01:25:56.460 the myloid type yes yeah right thank you yeah now you mentioned before about the 01:25:56.460 --> 01:26:02.520 the the SS 40 now that this is the Simeon virus I think isn't it Simeon 01:26:02.520 --> 01:26:07.860 virus 40 I'm a right in thinking that that coincidentally in infects monkey 01:26:07.860 --> 01:26:13.380 kidney cells which are cultured to and then those cell cultures are used to 01:26:13.380 --> 01:26:16.100 make the DNA which is then used to make the RNA which is in the vaccine does 01:26:16.100 --> 01:26:22.460 that the way it works I am not in theory yes yeah I'm not completely 01:26:22.460 --> 01:26:27.780 okay was in the vacuum kidney cells which is the Simeon virus now you mentioned 01:26:27.780 --> 01:26:34.540 before about the the SS 40 now that this is the Simeon virus I think isn't 01:26:34.540 --> 01:26:38.460 it Simeon virus 40 I'm a right in thinking that that coincidentally in 01:26:38.460 --> 01:26:44.780 infects monkey kidney cells which are cultured to and then those cell 01:26:44.780 --> 01:26:47.900 cultures are used to make the DNA which is then used to make the RNA which is in 01:26:47.900 --> 01:26:57.620 the vaccine is that the way it works I am not I don't know that that's the case 01:26:57.620 --> 01:27:05.580 would they use monkey kidney cells to make the DNA that is then grown in the 01:27:05.580 --> 01:27:13.580 bacteria I think they print the DNA I think they just made that DNA from from 01:27:13.580 --> 01:27:19.940 like synthetic so that it's super pure and then they couldn't create the whole 01:27:19.940 --> 01:27:25.700 construct and then they put that in I don't think that they use monkey kidney 01:27:25.700 --> 01:27:34.060 cells to do it I think that's incorrect and SV 40 the virus is different than 01:27:34.060 --> 01:27:41.100 the SV 40 promoter and the SV 40 promoter is used in the plasmid it is 01:27:41.100 --> 01:27:46.780 not the whole virus it is the start sequence that makes sure that the the 01:27:46.780 --> 01:27:52.820 bacteria makes many many many copies of the plasmid that contains it I think 01:27:52.820 --> 01:27:56.580 it's related to the origin of replication but it's not the origin of 01:27:56.580 --> 01:28:01.740 replicate could be the origin of replication I don't know SV 40 may be 01:28:01.820 --> 01:28:06.700 the origin of it but it's also just a promoter type thing like a signal that 01:28:06.700 --> 01:28:12.420 that tells the bacteria to make many copies of the plasmid so I'm not I'm 01:28:12.420 --> 01:28:15.660 pretty sure they're they're getting this confused but it'll go in theory yes 01:28:15.660 --> 01:28:22.740 yeah I'm not completely okay with how they are doing it I mean it's a commercial 01:28:22.740 --> 01:28:27.660 secret yeah now you find these sequences in both files are a Moderna you can 01:28:27.660 --> 01:28:32.980 start but I mean if it was just in one batch I think they need to be very 01:28:32.980 --> 01:28:37.300 careful here because they basically said that monkey kidney cells were used in 01:28:37.300 --> 01:28:42.780 the production of the vaccine and so what they're gonna do is they're gonna 01:28:42.780 --> 01:28:47.220 create this thing where then somebody can easily debunk them and say see John 01:28:47.220 --> 01:28:51.300 Campbell's an idiot he doesn't know what he's talking about monkey kidney cells 01:28:51.300 --> 01:28:55.860 would never use to make the DNA the DNA was made pure with synthetic processes 01:28:55.860 --> 01:29:02.620 they just printed it see how dumb John Campbell is now I'm not saying that I'm 01:29:02.620 --> 01:29:08.820 saying that what this sets up is for somebody to say that some some armchair 01:29:08.820 --> 01:29:17.140 youtuber debunker like debunk the funk can take this one clip and dunk on him 01:29:17.460 --> 01:29:28.540 do you see it it's really dangerous this is so bad this is how fragile are our 01:29:28.540 --> 01:29:32.780 statuses right now and how easily the cards can come down that's why I think 01:29:32.780 --> 01:29:38.380 it's a real trap to think that John Campbell is actually waking up he's got 01:29:38.380 --> 01:29:42.860 this guy on here but he's not pushing back against him at all he's deferring 01:29:42.860 --> 01:29:46.860 to his expertise even though there's lots of times here when he could have 01:29:46.860 --> 01:29:54.060 pushed back find this guy's email for me I'll see if I can get him on my stream 01:29:54.060 --> 01:30:01.020 that they'll join but you know I'll dry whoops whoops what the hell 01:30:01.020 --> 01:30:05.780 it's somebody a very early on various you pointed out that there were terrible 01:30:05.780 --> 01:30:09.780 side effects in some people even in the first and second years and then they 01:30:09.780 --> 01:30:14.260 found that there was a massive difference in the batches and so if 01:30:14.260 --> 01:30:17.560 there was three big batches one batch would be responsible for 90% of the side 01:30:17.560 --> 01:30:22.500 effects yeah so we know then this is a big quality control issue going on and 01:30:22.500 --> 01:30:26.660 so if as they say they find these sequences in lots of different batches it 01:30:26.660 --> 01:30:31.740 does that's just I think one of the bacteria used is E. coli which of course 01:30:31.740 --> 01:30:34.320 is what we call a gram-negative and if there's any contamination from the 01:30:34.320 --> 01:30:37.780 gram-negative cell walls that would make people that would make people pretty 01:30:37.860 --> 01:30:47.460 ill as well if that was the case I'm that's the endotoxin which we have 01:30:47.460 --> 01:30:57.420 heard we have heard Josh Getzko on this guy's program talk about that we've 01:30:57.420 --> 01:31:02.820 also heard Robert Malone talk about how he solved the endotoxin problem many 01:31:02.900 --> 01:31:09.260 years ago when he was trying to develop this technology interesting right we 01:31:09.260 --> 01:31:12.940 know for sure I mean I remember it very distinctly that he said that in that 01:31:12.940 --> 01:31:19.620 interview with with Vage on health Philip McMillan just a couple days ago I 01:31:19.620 --> 01:31:24.380 know I've been going for 34 days straight but I can remember what I did and I 01:31:24.380 --> 01:31:27.780 remember what we listened to and that's why this work is paying off because it 01:31:27.780 --> 01:31:31.380 seems like we're wasting our time watching the same thing over and over 01:31:31.500 --> 01:31:36.420 again but we're actually not what we're doing is we're catching people in lies 01:31:36.420 --> 01:31:42.540 because when you're lying it's hard to keep things straight and the more you 01:31:42.540 --> 01:31:46.860 see how people can't keep things straight the more it is easy to see that they 01:31:46.860 --> 01:31:54.380 must have been lying that and again I'm not talking about the present video but 01:31:54.380 --> 01:31:59.380 I am I need you to be cautioned into thinking that John Campbell has been 01:31:59.380 --> 01:32:04.500 awakened even if he's awake to the transfection being dangerous he's not 01:32:04.500 --> 01:32:13.420 awake to the sum total of of lies plus protocols equals very little virus he's 01:32:13.420 --> 01:32:20.740 still under the assumption that people were saved but there was contamination 01:32:20.740 --> 01:32:26.060 and the contamination could explain all of what this brother professor is saying 01:32:26.060 --> 01:32:31.540 if John Campbell wants to lean that way if that's the confirmation that he's 01:32:31.540 --> 01:32:36.780 looking for this professor is giving him all the ammunition he needs to confirm 01:32:36.780 --> 01:32:45.340 that well it could be the transfection but you know it's this DNA contamination 01:32:45.340 --> 01:32:50.620 is definitely bad I mean why are we talking about the 01:32:50.620 --> 01:32:54.460 transfection going to the lymph nodes right now they must know that they could 01:32:54.460 --> 01:33:00.100 know that he's been against this for so many months or years he must have looked 01:33:00.100 --> 01:33:06.460 into it too could find the same videos and descriptions that we have where it 01:33:06.460 --> 01:33:10.540 goes to the lymph node he's an immunologist what is he thinks gonna happen he 01:33:10.540 --> 01:33:18.220 described it earlier in the video you might remember to harness half the 01:33:18.220 --> 01:33:25.660 immune system with this shot can't be a good idea he said to harness half the 01:33:25.660 --> 01:33:32.140 immune system sounds a lot like transfecting a lymph node and all the cells 01:33:32.140 --> 01:33:38.420 in it doesn't it yee that idea concerned dramatically concerned about what you've 01:33:38.420 --> 01:33:45.900 seen already what possible implications could this have for cancers emerging 01:33:45.900 --> 01:33:52.700 over the next few years well obviously I'm aware of quite a few patients who 01:33:52.700 --> 01:33:56.420 mean bullied into having booster and then have the booster just to be safe 01:33:56.420 --> 01:34:00.420 because you're at risk I think this is highly unethical because and I have seen 01:34:00.420 --> 01:34:05.700 it a communication you are required to contact your GP immediately and arrange 01:34:05.700 --> 01:34:10.980 for another booster and things like that that is totally unethical it's non-GMC 01:34:10.980 --> 01:34:15.260 compliant in fact it's nearly Nuremberg Charlotte territory yeah because there's 01:34:15.300 --> 01:34:19.660 no informed consent there's not even any justification but the boosters going to 01:34:19.660 --> 01:34:24.100 do these patients any good in fact completely to the contrary and the big 01:34:24.100 --> 01:34:27.620 thing is that they they wanted you to have the vaccine and better protect 01:34:27.620 --> 01:34:31.140 everybody else it doesn't protect infection at all from the Cleveland 01:34:31.140 --> 01:34:37.660 study I know the big Cleveland study was updated it most as I've dated in 01:34:37.660 --> 01:34:40.500 September and they've confirmed if you have the booster you have three and a 01:34:40.500 --> 01:34:45.140 half guys more like to get COVID and if you don't so I would put that into 01:34:45.140 --> 01:34:50.500 grievous bodily arm territory not a necessary medical prophylactic treatment 01:34:50.500 --> 01:34:54.660 territory I mean the way in terms of what you want to do that and the only way that 01:34:54.660 --> 01:34:58.460 that is causing them to be three and a half times that's an interesting idea 01:34:58.460 --> 01:35:03.900 that that if you could show that the recommendation of the CDC actually led 01:35:03.900 --> 01:35:08.900 to more danger for the people who took the shots maybe you can blame it on them 01:35:08.900 --> 01:35:13.540 that's interesting and I don't think it's a pretty very ridiculous idea because 01:35:13.540 --> 01:35:18.140 again like this guy has been good at pointing out and what I think I was 01:35:18.140 --> 01:35:22.660 ranting about yesterday with regard to Drew Weismann's presentation about 01:35:22.660 --> 01:35:30.020 antibodies and activation of the immune system and and transfection or delivery 01:35:30.020 --> 01:35:36.060 of RNA in different places in the body the idea that unequivocally more is 01:35:36.100 --> 01:35:42.620 better in all cases and that the bigger difference between previous attempts at 01:35:42.620 --> 01:35:48.100 augmenting the immune system and this one with one metric was somehow a sign of 01:35:48.100 --> 01:35:55.540 superiority and what that that that whole argument belies is a gross 01:35:55.540 --> 01:36:00.940 underestimating of the complexity of the immune system what that that 01:36:00.940 --> 01:36:06.100 misrepresentation belies is a complete misunderstanding of how the immune system 01:36:06.100 --> 01:36:11.740 probably works and this guy seems to know more than Drew Weismann but doesn't 01:36:11.740 --> 01:36:17.580 really seem to be keen on really laying it out which is fine because maybe this 01:36:17.580 --> 01:36:21.660 is the first time he's been out there and it's got a lot of things he wants to 01:36:21.660 --> 01:36:27.300 say but we can be critical as we watch it and so that's why I'm drawing your 01:36:27.300 --> 01:36:31.980 attention to these things well likely is that it has perturbated the immune system 01:36:31.980 --> 01:36:35.100 and all the liars have said it's used its resources to fight viruses that don't 01:36:35.100 --> 01:36:39.580 exist it's making lots of useless antibodies which are actually contrary 01:36:39.580 --> 01:36:44.700 not to fighting viruses that don't exist means that it evolved to not have the 01:36:44.700 --> 01:36:49.620 original spike protein I think that's what he means so take that also with a 01:36:49.620 --> 01:36:54.260 grain of salt between to another one called antibody dependent in Harlan and 01:36:54.260 --> 01:36:58.740 the same Cleveland that they had reported that they the vaccine companies 01:36:58.740 --> 01:37:03.260 say ah but this is a great technology because all the new variants we can make 01:37:03.260 --> 01:37:07.700 a new vaccine for and give you the new variants and we can give you two variants at once 01:37:07.700 --> 01:37:13.900 there is no evidence that that protects you whatsoever in fact in all the 01:37:13.900 --> 01:37:18.620 mice work there's evidence that we'll actually do more harm by doing and so 01:37:18.620 --> 01:37:21.300 first of all this type of virus we have antibody dependent on the heart 01:37:21.300 --> 01:37:25.820 which I think is clearly going on yeah but secondly to explain why they're so 01:37:25.820 --> 01:37:30.180 useless is that I published with some other colleagues because there's a 01:37:30.180 --> 01:37:32.700 completely different group from the origin of the virus going over the 01:37:32.700 --> 01:37:37.020 secrets of finding out these of all we genetically put in I publish with 01:37:37.020 --> 01:37:40.900 another set of colleagues is what the history of coronavirus vaccine is and 01:37:40.900 --> 01:37:44.500 what lessons can be learned from it the lessons that can be learned from it is 01:37:44.500 --> 01:37:48.740 no coronavirus vaccine is ever been shown to be of any use at all and that's 01:37:49.300 --> 01:37:55.500 what I was saying in 2020 in May there was never a coronavirus vaccine that's 01:37:55.500 --> 01:38:01.140 ever worked not in veterinary science not in a laboratory model it's never 01:38:01.140 --> 01:38:07.860 worked and so there was no reason to believe that this would work now to the 01:38:07.860 --> 01:38:13.500 contrary one of the motivating factors of Ralph Barracks laboratory in the 01:38:13.500 --> 01:38:19.620 beginning was to use coronaviruses because of their harmless nature because 01:38:19.620 --> 01:38:24.820 of their ability to fly under the radar because our immune system ignored them 01:38:24.820 --> 01:38:34.860 they might be useful for molecular techniques for medical use extraordinary 01:38:34.860 --> 01:38:39.140 they don't have one for the cult and more importantly they would love one the 01:38:39.140 --> 01:38:44.060 next would love them but they just don't they just don't work and the main 01:38:44.060 --> 01:38:48.100 reason they don't they don't work is the coronavirus has had this phenomenon 01:38:48.100 --> 01:38:52.780 once they became system seen it it locks in it's called immunological imprinting 01:38:52.780 --> 01:38:56.900 or antigenic sin so when you do any variation all you do is boost the 01:38:56.900 --> 01:39:01.220 response to the person and that would explain why they're so useless and why 01:39:01.220 --> 01:39:06.100 they're letting all other other variants in through the back door and other 01:39:06.100 --> 01:39:09.100 people have said that we probably wouldn't have to see that I think is a 01:39:09.100 --> 01:39:12.300 really it's not a good enough explanation so I'm just getting it 01:39:12.300 --> 01:39:17.780 rough him again I'm gonna make my my image a little bigger what he should be 01:39:17.780 --> 01:39:25.260 saying is that if we instruct the immune system to pay attention to parts of the 01:39:25.260 --> 01:39:30.580 coronavirus which are not functionally constrained then we will instruct the 01:39:30.580 --> 01:39:35.620 immune system to make memory to a changing target and our immune system 01:39:35.620 --> 01:39:41.020 doesn't do that normally and when our immune system makes mistakes is when it 01:39:41.020 --> 01:39:49.060 does make memory to self proteins or to a moving target and so part of what the 01:39:49.060 --> 01:39:55.300 immune system has evolved to do is select epitopes from the antigen that 01:39:55.300 --> 01:40:04.380 seem to be functionally constrained that are related related related to previous 01:40:04.380 --> 01:40:12.700 epitopes previous proteins that have been seen your body has a mechanism which 01:40:12.700 --> 01:40:16.020 I can't explain because I don't adequately understand but I assure you 01:40:16.020 --> 01:40:25.020 it's there to use the catalog of previously memorized epitopes in 01:40:25.020 --> 01:40:30.860 functionally constrained proteins of other entities like this RNA virus 01:40:30.860 --> 01:40:39.940 whatever it is and those epitopes are from this most the immune system is 01:40:39.940 --> 01:40:45.140 designed to first select from those rather than to augment and awaken new 01:40:45.140 --> 01:40:53.020 ones and we're awakening new naive de novo memories in the immune system is 01:40:53.020 --> 01:40:59.180 much more complex than augmenting previously activated and already 01:40:59.180 --> 01:41:06.660 crescendo de crescendo memories that are stored in the immune system and those 01:41:06.660 --> 01:41:10.660 are two very different processes that vaccinologists never talk about that 01:41:10.660 --> 01:41:14.100 these people that sell this stuff never talk about that these guys aren't talking 01:41:14.100 --> 01:41:20.820 about so we've got to be always on top of this but this imprinting thing is 01:41:20.820 --> 01:41:26.780 important but he could also point out that there are there are genes and there 01:41:26.820 --> 01:41:32.460 are sections of the genome that whether you believe in the coronavirus biology 01:41:32.460 --> 01:41:38.660 per se or not the primary literature that occurs before 2020 shows clearly 01:41:38.660 --> 01:41:44.260 that there are parts of this virus that don't change and therefore can be used 01:41:44.260 --> 01:41:50.660 as targets in a pan coronavirus PCR test that's the end protein that's the RNA 01:41:50.660 --> 01:41:55.420 dependent RNA polymerase and for years that's how we found all coronaviruses is 01:41:55.460 --> 01:42:02.220 looking for the things they share in common and your immune system has taken 01:42:02.220 --> 01:42:06.260 the same strategy in developing whatever immunity is necessary in order to cope 01:42:06.260 --> 01:42:13.660 with coronaviruses the least memory possible the immune system tries to 01:42:13.660 --> 01:42:21.220 respond the least memory possible it's become very obvious to me that this idea 01:42:21.300 --> 01:42:25.700 of forcing the immune system to make a robust memory to something is exactly 01:42:25.700 --> 01:42:33.180 antithetical to how the immune system works you're trying to avoid a cascade 01:42:33.180 --> 01:42:39.380 you're trying to get the least amount of memory formed the least amount of 01:42:39.380 --> 01:42:47.140 activation to cope with every threat to maintain inside from out we're gonna 01:42:47.140 --> 01:42:50.420 learn how to teach this immune system better than it's ever been taught before 01:42:51.060 --> 01:42:55.340 and that's how we're going to change the world because when people understand 01:42:55.340 --> 01:43:00.300 that their immune system has been made dumb simple in order to pray upon us in 01:43:00.300 --> 01:43:08.660 order to get us to sign up as unhealthy test subjects so that eventually our 01:43:08.660 --> 01:43:16.140 grandchildren will be born into a system like that once you understand we're 01:43:16.140 --> 01:43:19.860 going to be free I've had the problem with the variants it hadn't been for the 01:43:19.860 --> 01:43:24.620 vaccine program in the first place which in retrospect everybody said well at 01:43:24.620 --> 01:43:33.220 least to protect it loads of people but I don't even buy that anymore because it 01:43:33.220 --> 01:43:37.340 came in when everything was dying out and new variants were being induced 01:43:37.340 --> 01:43:42.620 probably by the vaccine so you know one of them I can tell you that I'm gonna 01:43:42.620 --> 01:43:47.820 have Denny Rancour on the show again he just sent me his newest paper and that 01:43:47.820 --> 01:43:59.460 paper is pretty cool because it deals with taking this claim of the of the 01:44:00.020 --> 01:44:16.620 it takes there it is it this is his 01:44:16.620 --> 01:44:21.020 substantive evaluation of whether the Nobel Prize winning COVID-19 vaccines 01:44:21.020 --> 01:44:29.100 actually saved lives and if you take a look at the article you will see 01:44:29.940 --> 01:44:36.460 that if you throw in the numbers and what what Denny has which is really 01:44:36.460 --> 01:44:41.060 cool is that he has in this gray line here so the blue line is the actual more 01:44:41.060 --> 01:44:47.380 to all cause mortality the gray line is the rollout of the vaccines from zero to 01:44:47.380 --> 01:44:54.220 you know all the vaccines are out and so in order for between 14 million and 01:44:54.220 --> 01:44:59.900 19 million people to have been saved by the vaccine it would have to have been 01:44:59.900 --> 01:45:03.660 saved after the rollout of the vaccine right so that's what Denny has here in 01:45:03.660 --> 01:45:09.900 this time frame is that the rollout of the vaccine is the gray numbers and what we 01:45:09.900 --> 01:45:14.180 are supposed to have avoided is the red number then because the red number would 01:45:14.180 --> 01:45:18.740 be 14 million people on top of the all-cause mortality that we have here and as 01:45:18.820 --> 01:45:24.660 you know the blue already shows increases in all cause mortality that 01:45:24.660 --> 01:45:29.420 aren't due to COVID but are seem to be due to the shot rollout but now we see 01:45:29.420 --> 01:45:36.660 the preposterous nature of the claim that the vaccine saved 14 million to 19 01:45:36.660 --> 01:45:41.540 million lives if we see these charts and of course you could do this all around 01:45:41.540 --> 01:45:48.660 the world in Canada and elsewhere because they made numbers in this paper that was 01:45:48.660 --> 01:45:52.740 published in the Landsat which we will talk about with Denny as well that 01:45:52.740 --> 01:45:58.020 claimed these crazy figures and so you can throw it back on top of these 01:45:58.020 --> 01:46:02.780 figures and show what they claimed they saved with the vaccine and see how 01:46:02.780 --> 01:46:10.340 absurd it is and nonetheless they're making these claims and it doesn't really 01:46:10.340 --> 01:46:15.780 seem as though we're gonna escape from this until people realize that it is the 01:46:15.780 --> 01:46:20.180 protocols that created the illusion that allowed the vaccine to be rolled out in 01:46:20.180 --> 01:46:28.260 the first place it wasn't the cover-up of a lab virus it was the appearance of the 01:46:28.260 --> 01:46:32.660 cover-up of a lab virus that distracted people from realizing that the 01:46:32.660 --> 01:46:38.700 protocols and that the tests were being used to roll up all cause mortality into 01:46:38.700 --> 01:46:43.740 a new disease and they doing everything they could to drive up all cause 01:46:43.780 --> 01:46:48.540 mortality do not resuscitate orders ventilating people that don't need it 01:46:48.540 --> 01:46:57.460 remdesivir, medazolam, opioids, anything to get all cause mortality to go up when 01:46:57.460 --> 01:47:01.100 they needed it to go up at the start of the pandemic where they needed to go up 01:47:01.100 --> 01:47:07.660 at the start of the pandemic and then once this machine was rolling it was 01:47:07.660 --> 01:47:12.420 gonna go to the end and that's what people are starting to realize as they 01:47:12.420 --> 01:47:19.260 look backwards and they investigate what people did in 2020 and you realize 01:47:19.260 --> 01:47:23.300 that people realized that there was money to be made opportunities to be had 01:47:23.300 --> 01:47:30.460 and they were acting too early to not to have been tipped off people are 01:47:30.460 --> 01:47:33.860 starting to scramble for the exits ladies and gentlemen because we're on to 01:47:33.860 --> 01:47:38.180 them I'm not saying these guys are the bad guys I'm saying that this is how it 01:47:38.180 --> 01:47:43.580 happens and this is what we said a few years ago they're gonna slow roll us to 01:47:43.580 --> 01:47:48.340 the truth here are these guys being allowed to say this are these guys 01:47:48.340 --> 01:47:51.740 slowly figuring it out I don't know but there's if they're slowly figuring it 01:47:51.740 --> 01:47:58.300 out then they're right on pace with the Scooby-Doo that's gonna eventually be 01:47:58.300 --> 01:48:02.220 used to blame it on certain Western countries that this was allowed to 01:48:02.220 --> 01:48:07.820 happen which I don't necessarily disagree with but if we don't come to 01:48:07.820 --> 01:48:12.900 terms with the extent to which they lied to us about the proportion of people 01:48:12.900 --> 01:48:21.620 killed by a novel virus gain a function leak versus protocols and lies and fake 01:48:21.620 --> 01:48:29.540 testing we're never gonna escape. One of the big important chapters was in the 01:48:29.540 --> 01:48:32.860 the places that got the new various quicker so those are the most intensified 01:48:32.860 --> 01:48:36.220 vaccine programs and one of the ones the first ones to come out that was 01:48:36.220 --> 01:48:40.420 completely different was only Chrome which came out to South Africa and the 01:48:40.420 --> 01:48:44.300 South Africans beautifully described that this was a much more infectious 01:48:44.300 --> 01:48:48.860 agent but it wasn't serious don't worry about it don't do this that it is not 01:48:48.860 --> 01:48:52.860 thing just don't worry about it and by the way we've done our work it makes no 01:48:52.860 --> 01:48:56.420 difference whether you're vaccinated or unvaccinated whether you get infected 01:48:56.420 --> 01:48:59.100 whether you get ill whether you go classical or you die they had all that 01:48:59.100 --> 01:49:04.660 data on the plate again they communicated with the the government and all these 01:49:04.660 --> 01:49:08.740 people who decided that they probably not that clever and got it wrong and they 01:49:08.740 --> 01:49:12.540 persisted with lockdown and I do think that that data is the reason why Nick 01:49:12.540 --> 01:49:17.660 Hudson was so hot for so long because he knew that in in South Africa they had 01:49:17.660 --> 01:49:21.780 data which showed otherwise other lunatic things all South African 01:49:21.780 --> 01:49:25.060 science got it wrong yeah and of course in retrospect they got a hundred percent 01:49:25.060 --> 01:49:30.100 right and I must say after hearing them being interviewed I knew they were 01:49:30.100 --> 01:49:33.620 completely right because they're absolutely absolutely special and people 01:49:33.620 --> 01:49:36.780 who work in that environment tend to be brighter than those who end up in white 01:49:36.780 --> 01:49:42.540 hole indeed so giving repeated booster doses of vaccine produces more antibodies 01:49:42.540 --> 01:49:46.500 if you've got time to tell us what our antibody dependent enhancement is what 01:49:46.500 --> 01:49:51.540 is being enhanced by these antibodies well as mentioned the antibodies they're 01:49:51.540 --> 01:49:55.260 no longer neutralizing because they were developed in order to attack a virus 01:49:55.260 --> 01:49:59.700 and said that's got long gone so you've got all these antibodies and they attach 01:49:59.700 --> 01:50:03.340 to the other viruses because there's some bits the same but they don't 01:50:03.340 --> 01:50:08.740 neutralize it so by attaching to it they they have their antibodies sticking 01:50:08.740 --> 01:50:12.900 out so they're more likely to be gobbled up by the macrophages things and brought 01:50:12.900 --> 01:50:17.060 into the system so it makes them more likely to go into cells it makes them 01:50:17.060 --> 01:50:20.980 more likely to go in cells yes and it's very it's very well described and it's 01:50:20.980 --> 01:50:26.020 the bane of trying to produce vaccines against things like dengue fever 01:50:26.020 --> 01:50:30.220 I think that they're being disingenuous with this mechanism here and it's just 01:50:30.220 --> 01:50:34.860 dawned on me what they're what they're disingenuous about 01:50:34.860 --> 01:50:42.340 so antibodies are supposed to bind to the virus and neutralize the virus meaning 01:50:42.340 --> 01:50:51.340 block the receptor and I think this is wrong because they're supposed to do 01:50:51.340 --> 01:50:56.740 lots of things they're supposed to tag the virus for processing they are 01:50:56.740 --> 01:51:02.900 supposed to bring in complement to destroy it to rupture it and they can 01:51:02.900 --> 01:51:08.900 also I don't think that antibodies are just designed to block the receptor and 01:51:08.900 --> 01:51:13.980 do nothing else and that's what neutralizing means they're no longer 01:51:13.980 --> 01:51:19.620 neutralizing that's what that means if they're not neutralizing it means that 01:51:19.620 --> 01:51:26.260 they don't block the receptor and neutralize it I think this is a very 01:51:26.260 --> 01:51:31.340 big mistake this is a very big trap here in the immunomethology the 01:51:31.340 --> 01:51:35.780 neutralization means something when the antibodies don't neutralize anymore it 01:51:35.900 --> 01:51:41.820 means that they bind to a different part of the receptor binding domain but 01:51:41.820 --> 01:51:45.060 that shouldn't necessarily mean that that wouldn't allow the immune system 01:51:45.060 --> 01:51:50.540 to find the virus and to take it up it's not the uptake of the virus that's 01:51:50.540 --> 01:51:58.740 dangerous I don't think because if neutralization was important then you 01:51:58.740 --> 01:52:01.780 would need as we've talked about before you would need a neutralizing 01:52:01.780 --> 01:52:07.740 antibody for every spike protein on every virus otherwise the neutralizing 01:52:07.740 --> 01:52:15.300 thing would only be partial and so I think we fooled ourselves with some of 01:52:15.300 --> 01:52:22.420 these in vitro assays to assume that neutralization is how it works when we 01:52:22.420 --> 01:52:26.220 do these things in a dish there's no other immune cells there there's no 01:52:26.220 --> 01:52:31.980 complement system there there's nothing there so then in that while I can't 01:52:31.980 --> 01:52:37.460 believe I'm figuring this outright live on the screen but in that preparation in 01:52:37.460 --> 01:52:42.940 a cell culture where there's no immune system and no complement system then 01:52:42.940 --> 01:52:48.220 it's easy to imagine that antibodies neutralize the fusion protein of 01:52:48.220 --> 01:52:53.300 viruses and prevent the fusion and prevent the RNA from being taken up by 01:52:53.340 --> 01:52:59.980 those cells but that's a very very closed system where any other effects that 01:52:59.980 --> 01:53:06.380 the antibody binding to that virus would have are not there which could 01:53:06.380 --> 01:53:11.380 include immediate destruction by the complement system the complement system 01:53:11.380 --> 01:53:18.380 acts very quickly T cells and macrophages can act very quickly and if 01:53:18.380 --> 01:53:24.140 they're there to take up the cells this could be a distraction anybody 01:53:24.140 --> 01:53:27.500 dependent enhancement is a much more complicated thing which may involve 01:53:27.500 --> 01:53:36.900 actually the idea that the antibodies that bind to this thing help it to infect 01:53:36.900 --> 01:53:44.660 your cells protected from immune activation no they caused the immune 01:53:44.660 --> 01:53:50.820 activation so you have all these antibodies floating around free in 01:53:50.820 --> 01:53:57.580 your in your blood and when they bind to things and aggregate they cause 01:53:57.580 --> 01:54:05.300 inflammation so that antibody dependent enhancement is simply could be as simple 01:54:05.300 --> 01:54:10.820 as the idea of having antibodies when you don't need them and since the only 01:54:10.860 --> 01:54:17.540 thing that we can usefully augment in a vaccine scenario is seroprevalence that 01:54:17.540 --> 01:54:22.540 any time that antibodies are maladaptive you get antibody dependent 01:54:22.540 --> 01:54:28.340 enhancement what a stupid name for having antibodies when you don't need 01:54:28.340 --> 01:54:37.900 them what a stupid excuse for augmenting the immune system going wrong oh my 01:54:37.940 --> 01:54:43.540 gosh this is blowing my mind that I'm figuring this out right now have we 01:54:43.540 --> 01:54:48.260 really bamboozled ourselves to the extent to which that we believe that 01:54:48.260 --> 01:54:53.420 antibody dependent enhancement love you have too many of the wrong ones it'll be 01:54:53.420 --> 01:54:59.900 bad it's not too many of the wrong ones too many antibodies period think about 01:54:59.900 --> 01:55:05.060 that proteins floating around in your blood to protect you from stuff that's 01:55:05.060 --> 01:55:10.260 not what your blood is a soup of proteins that protect you from stuff that 01:55:10.260 --> 01:55:16.180 memorize all different kinds of epitopes you got antibodies for all this that's 01:55:16.180 --> 01:55:28.100 not how it works holy cow we got them oh my gosh we got them of course once the 01:55:28.100 --> 01:55:32.900 antibody is held in a cell culture where you do a neutralizing assay you don't 01:55:32.940 --> 01:55:38.060 have the immune system you don't have the complement system and so it's a very 01:55:38.060 --> 01:55:43.340 little cartoon world where the only readout you have is whether or not these 01:55:43.340 --> 01:55:47.420 pseudo virus particles bind to the cell culture and cause the cell culture to 01:55:47.420 --> 01:55:55.620 change and so then it's very easy to you have antibodies in the solution and so 01:55:55.620 --> 01:56:01.140 now that reaction doesn't happen and now you have this whole cartoon in your 01:56:01.180 --> 01:56:05.620 imagination that says that fusion proteins are blocked by antibodies and 01:56:05.620 --> 01:56:13.100 that's how we defend ourselves against viruses and so the more antibodies you 01:56:13.100 --> 01:56:19.900 have the better don't you see it holy shit 01:56:21.580 --> 01:56:26.900 the virus into the cell oh my gosh I can't believe I'm figuring this out now in 01:56:26.900 --> 01:56:32.100 2023 so the government are building a new plant in Harwell Science Park just 01:56:32.100 --> 01:56:36.860 near Oxford to produce 250 million doses of mRNA vaccine per year as far as we 01:56:36.860 --> 01:56:39.380 know there's another plant near Melbourne we believe in Australia to 01:56:39.380 --> 01:56:41.780 produce a couple hundred million doses per year there's another one in Canada 01:56:41.780 --> 01:56:49.380 is this a good idea have to think very carefully I read today that Germany has 01:56:49.380 --> 01:56:53.740 ordered the destruction of millions of millions doses of vaccines having come 01:56:53.740 --> 01:56:58.340 to the right conclusion Switzerland is the same Switzerland been all their 01:56:58.340 --> 01:57:04.420 vaccines I think they've been a hoodwink about this I mean we do did need a good 01:57:04.420 --> 01:57:10.780 facility but now I don't the last mass production needs messenger RNA I think 01:57:10.780 --> 01:57:14.220 it should be put in totally into the bin a lot he hate me for this because they've 01:57:14.220 --> 01:57:19.900 put so much intellectual everything in it but I mean if I if I was 10 years ago 01:57:19.900 --> 01:57:25.060 involved a scientific things committees who had everything sorted out to go in 01:57:25.060 --> 01:57:28.020 and they're talking about cancer vaccines you know so many safety issues 01:57:28.020 --> 01:57:31.700 aren't the same as giving it to own every man and his dog yes it's just 01:57:31.700 --> 01:57:33.780 chalk and cheese isn't it if you've got someone with someone with a who's 01:57:33.780 --> 01:57:36.740 perfectly healthy and you give them an intervention you've got one set of 01:57:36.740 --> 01:57:39.500 risk benefit analysis if you've got one of your patients for example who's 01:57:39.500 --> 01:57:43.540 gravely ill with some form of cancer then clearly you're going to be prepared to 01:57:43.540 --> 01:57:46.820 take a bigger potential risk because the risk from the cancer is so much bigger 01:57:46.820 --> 01:57:50.060 it just seems a completely different equation it's proportionality yeah 01:57:50.060 --> 01:57:57.780 proportionality with the messenger RNA risk and well populations saying you 01:57:57.780 --> 01:58:01.860 are preventing them getting okay so he does get that that's good they're going 01:58:01.860 --> 01:58:09.180 to die anyway I mean you know we've all lived through I mean the COVID thing 01:58:09.180 --> 01:58:13.820 has made us forget just how lethal some of the flu epidemics have been I mean 01:58:13.820 --> 01:58:20.660 30,000 years not unusual I was a junior doctor so we didn't close down the 01:58:20.660 --> 01:58:26.900 country from that that's all I want to ask really professor just got one we do 01:58:26.900 --> 01:58:31.580 plan if you would like to I'd like to do another video at some stage on viral 01:58:31.580 --> 01:58:35.540 origins I don't want to do that today but that's an interesting one but do you 01:58:35.540 --> 01:58:38.900 have a particular blood level that you like to titrate your patients with 01:58:38.900 --> 01:58:43.060 cancers how high do you like their vitamin D levels to be 01:58:43.060 --> 01:58:47.540 oh yes I've done a lot of work on that and I know that came to the I came to 01:58:47.540 --> 01:58:51.420 conclusion that the normal level which the NHS and doctors like to bark at you 01:58:51.420 --> 01:58:55.500 normally you don't need to do anything there's not normal at all because it's 01:58:55.500 --> 01:58:59.540 the normal population which is endemically low if it isn't indeed that is the 01:58:59.540 --> 01:59:04.200 problem it is means you're like that they're like normal for people with low 01:59:04.200 --> 01:59:09.100 bit of indeed normal for people that are low I mean I don't know what to work and 01:59:09.580 --> 01:59:14.060 most things I included myself in this and I measured my own bit of indeed and 01:59:14.060 --> 01:59:18.180 took a bit of the exception and I read wisely I mean and I must give full 01:59:18.180 --> 01:59:22.860 credit to David Grimes and David Anderson who really I mean if anybody 01:59:22.860 --> 01:59:27.060 deserved the Nobel Prize let me make sure about the Nobel Prize for the 01:59:27.060 --> 01:59:32.140 COVID pandemic because I had lobbied strongly independently and I found 01:59:32.140 --> 01:59:36.340 that they had to and to ignore us and many others who probably do the same 01:59:36.340 --> 01:59:39.900 thing I think there's is medical negligence what the government total 01:59:39.900 --> 01:59:45.180 medical issues anyway to not forgetting your actual question is I came to 01:59:45.180 --> 01:59:49.940 conclusion I want all my patients to have a vitamin D3 level over a hundred 01:59:49.940 --> 01:59:55.140 nanomoles per liter not 50 as the NHS seems quite happy with I managed to get 01:59:55.140 --> 02:00:00.100 our own hospitals except up to 75 but for my patients I wanted to be over a 02:00:00.100 --> 02:00:03.420 hundred it makes an unbelievable difference so that'd be about 40 in 02:00:03.420 --> 02:00:09.580 America nanograms per mill I honestly you've got me there I think you divide 02:00:09.580 --> 02:00:13.300 I was trying to do it you divide by 2.5 so I quite quite so it's around about 02:00:13.300 --> 02:00:16.500 that but over a hundred nanomoles per liter it would be your preference 02:00:16.500 --> 02:00:20.500 yes and it really does make a big difference and that might mean giving like 02:00:20.500 --> 02:00:24.140 10,000 units a day to bump it up over a thousand I mean the other thing there's 02:00:24.140 --> 02:00:31.620 300 genes involved in absorbing it. Fauci was taken four thousand units per 02:00:31.620 --> 02:00:39.900 day I think when he was on the Jennifer Garner Instagram podcast in 2020 he said 02:00:39.900 --> 02:00:43.220 he was taken four thousand units a day and producing the act component of the 02:00:43.220 --> 02:00:48.300 vitamin D3 most people are going to have a mild deficiency in one of those 02:00:48.300 --> 02:00:53.100 gene productions at some stage so I've seen people who have had very low 02:00:53.100 --> 02:00:58.580 vitamin D and I'm a statement that they outdoor lives they have great nutrition 02:00:58.580 --> 02:01:03.500 and everything like that and they've got very low vitamin D's I again because I 02:01:03.500 --> 02:01:08.060 have to know explanations for all these things of course I signed this 02:01:08.060 --> 02:01:14.060 except I said to this guy but I said you're super low it's like he deliberately 02:01:14.060 --> 02:01:17.900 avoided vitamin D tell me what you do because you're always out cycling in the 02:01:17.900 --> 02:01:22.100 sun and it's so fit next I and he says well I get up in the morning I have my 02:01:22.100 --> 02:01:27.860 breakfast and then I slap on my sunscreen and this that I go for a bike 02:01:27.860 --> 02:01:35.460 I said what fact did he use he said 50 right well once I knew 50 I started 02:01:35.460 --> 02:01:43.100 asking 50 is a complete block because it's even worse though because you're 02:01:43.100 --> 02:01:47.660 also putting things on your skin your skin is your immune barrier your skin 02:01:47.660 --> 02:01:53.240 is not necessarily liking all the chemicals that are in that product so 02:01:53.240 --> 02:01:56.780 not only are you robbing yourself of natural production of vitamin D which 02:01:56.820 --> 02:02:02.740 is now starting to seem so strange right that they were so insistent that we 02:02:02.740 --> 02:02:07.300 needed to protect ourselves from the Sun and that we could use Sun cream to do 02:02:07.300 --> 02:02:13.940 it as opposed to you know like a a parasol which is really the sad part of 02:02:13.940 --> 02:02:19.100 this that's all we really needed is just stay in the shade like they do in 02:02:19.100 --> 02:02:25.900 tropical countries and instead we sold products sold products sold chemicals 02:02:26.060 --> 02:02:33.740 that we put on our immune system on our barrier the largest organ in our body 02:02:33.740 --> 02:02:38.740 and these guys are talking about it now too like SPF 50 is not even what matters 02:02:38.740 --> 02:02:45.380 what what matters is the goo the garbage and we were clogging ourselves with 02:02:45.380 --> 02:02:50.300 covering ourselves with some of the most sensitive skin our body is our face 02:02:50.300 --> 02:02:54.980 he's describing somebody putting it on his face every day 02:02:56.380 --> 02:03:03.420 while we have AOC on Instagram complaining about how sunscreen is is too 02:03:03.420 --> 02:03:11.180 highly regulated in America by the FDA that's her concern right now man we are 02:03:11.180 --> 02:03:14.660 making progress but we're not making progress it's like we're spinning our 02:03:14.660 --> 02:03:22.460 wheels in the deepest puddle of mud it's starting to be rewarding because the 02:03:22.460 --> 02:03:25.940 engines making noise and we're able to shift some gears and there's mud flying 02:03:25.940 --> 02:03:32.060 everywhere and it's moving we're not going that far we need to focus we need 02:03:32.060 --> 02:03:35.420 to get the attention of these people and start to explain to them the real depth 02:03:35.420 --> 02:03:39.660 and breadth of this delusion they're in under now the people using fact that you 02:03:39.660 --> 02:03:42.900 are having super low bit of indeed even if they're out the Sun all the time so 02:03:42.900 --> 02:03:47.260 it's far too strong and that's another global thing that the NHS and people 02:03:47.260 --> 02:03:50.540 should do they should remove fact that it's actually dangerous because it 02:03:50.540 --> 02:03:54.580 completely locks out the visible to cope with it indeed so anyway so that's 02:03:54.580 --> 02:04:00.540 how going back I think that's a hundred nanomoles is to a some people and then 02:04:00.540 --> 02:04:05.780 we put it this way I've seen nobody near a hundred who hasn't been taking 02:04:05.780 --> 02:04:11.220 supplements with one exception and I won't forget it I said this it was quite 02:04:11.220 --> 02:04:16.660 a elderly man yet now we treated him quite well and I said you know we need 02:04:16.660 --> 02:04:19.580 to make sure he has his vitamin D supplements things like that but I 02:04:19.580 --> 02:04:24.180 measure it first and when he came back he had a level like 97 98 which is near 02:04:24.180 --> 02:04:28.660 enough a hundred doctor and I said each shore he doesn't take any vitamin D 02:04:28.660 --> 02:04:32.620 and he said no no no he only takes he takes his aspirin and his heart tablets 02:04:32.620 --> 02:04:38.340 and they said they walked out the door and his way popped back in that says do 02:04:38.340 --> 02:04:41.620 you know what though ever since I had put him on cod liver oil he's been 02:04:42.540 --> 02:04:51.780 yeah let's go back to the other side was the the so-called bait they don't 02:04:51.780 --> 02:04:54.820 might mention that now they don't like anything but they're just dark cool and 02:04:54.820 --> 02:04:59.300 skin all the early people who die in a dark kind of skin and they did another 02:04:59.300 --> 02:05:04.020 report useless report which found it was every form of discrimination poverty 02:05:04.020 --> 02:05:08.180 deprivation they didn't mention a bit of the deeper I have never seen a dark 02:05:08.180 --> 02:05:13.220 kind of skin black and Asian person in the hospital that I've done I've never 02:05:13.220 --> 02:05:17.100 seen one of them with a bit of indio 30 unless somebody's got to the first 02:05:17.100 --> 02:05:21.780 they're taking supplements that was the explanation for their end to death rate 02:05:21.780 --> 02:05:24.780 that we had and now because it couldn't have been deprivation because it was 02:05:24.780 --> 02:05:31.340 right I mean there was many doctors the first opera consultants yeah they may 02:05:31.340 --> 02:05:36.980 argue that they're deprived but not everybody else later so that was the 02:05:36.980 --> 02:05:40.420 first and that was the thing I tried to get through to witty and again I mean 02:05:40.420 --> 02:05:44.660 the guy is just I mean he really is totally unfit for purpose I mean why 02:05:44.660 --> 02:05:47.860 hasn't been sacked or why hasn't resigned I have no idea he's absolutely 02:05:47.860 --> 02:05:50.740 grateful he kept saying again the game there's no need for a bit of indeed 02:05:50.740 --> 02:05:55.140 like he didn't need to know about it yeah I'm pretty sure I got a message through 02:05:55.140 --> 02:05:58.180 to Chris witty via various political figures as well I'm pretty sure it got 02:05:58.180 --> 02:06:02.900 through I know Brian's Anderson did too but anyway there are four papers out 02:06:02.900 --> 02:06:06.500 there in retrospect showing that the bit of indeed had a better protection than 02:06:06.500 --> 02:06:10.620 any of the vaccine brain and the one that I think is the most important was a 02:06:10.620 --> 02:06:13.660 big Spanish study which revealed that there's a lot of it in indeed 02:06:13.660 --> 02:06:17.660 deficiency in Spain which I would not have thought that it is they avoid the 02:06:17.660 --> 02:06:20.540 sun and then when they're young they get leathery skin so we have a 02:06:20.540 --> 02:06:24.060 significant point and they did a retrospective study of everybody admitted 02:06:24.060 --> 02:06:28.860 to hospitals who ill of covid so they looked at everything and the only the 02:06:28.860 --> 02:06:34.060 only conclusion a meta analysis was it was really simple if your vitamin D 02:06:34.060 --> 02:06:38.460 level was below 30 when you went into hospital with covid you had a 77% 02:06:38.460 --> 02:06:44.140 chance of dying if it was over 75 you had a 2% chance that I don't need to 02:06:44.140 --> 02:06:48.660 bother my statistical department's heads in order to work out what's how 02:06:48.660 --> 02:06:53.500 significant even I can cope with that one yeah it was unbelievable yeah I love 02:06:53.500 --> 02:06:56.740 this micro bacterium that you give so it's a simple micro bacterium that you 02:06:56.740 --> 02:07:00.540 kill it and you inject it and that produces a broad spectrum immunity 02:07:00.540 --> 02:07:04.300 against a variety of viruses potentially influenza potentially covid 02:07:04.300 --> 02:07:08.140 well if the reason it does it is because it boosts the innate immune 02:07:08.140 --> 02:07:12.260 loss so presumably the government by biting your hand off to get the rest of 02:07:12.260 --> 02:07:18.180 your time I told them all about it and I mean once again you couldn't make it 02:07:18.180 --> 02:07:22.860 up I couldn't believe it Chris Witte said there wasn't enough animal work 02:07:22.860 --> 02:07:27.240 done on it it had been in hundreds of patients we did have not had a single 02:07:27.240 --> 02:07:31.800 SAE another example that is not fit well what's SAE sorry serious adverse 02:07:31.800 --> 02:07:36.880 event yeah there's many of those I mean it actually is a very very safe 02:07:36.880 --> 02:07:40.680 vaccine it's a very very safe unlike Pfizer where if you go back to the 02:07:40.680 --> 02:07:45.720 VAERS data that was released basically if you had a serious adverse event three 02:07:45.720 --> 02:07:50.800 or four of which means here you have 3% chance of dying well nobody would get 02:07:50.800 --> 02:07:54.360 a vaccine with a 3% chance of dying with an adverse event but it was covered up 02:07:54.360 --> 02:08:00.240 it was only released as you know that I caught demanded that on freedom 02:08:00.240 --> 02:08:03.880 expression that it be released otherwise we never know so you're just using this 02:08:03.880 --> 02:08:08.240 vaccine in your own clinical trials I'm gonna fade this out 02:08:09.200 --> 02:08:17.200 I need to get to bed on time tonight I have decided to make the commitment to 02:08:17.200 --> 02:08:21.920 coach a sixth-grade basketball team this fall which means there's no way in 02:08:21.920 --> 02:08:27.120 the hell I'm gonna be able to keep up nightly streaming but that doesn't mean 02:08:27.120 --> 02:08:31.520 much right now because it's not gonna start till November I just want to give 02:08:31.520 --> 02:08:36.920 you a heads-up that this utopian nightly delivery mechanism is not gonna last 02:08:36.920 --> 02:08:44.960 that long probably make it to Halloween which might be 67 in a row I put the 02:08:44.960 --> 02:08:50.960 chat in the chat this link I can still see it up there at 958 so if you want to 02:08:50.960 --> 02:08:55.160 watch the rest of this video or watch it again without my commentary by all 02:08:55.160 --> 02:08:59.680 means do so thank you very much to all the people that are scrolling about my 02:08:59.680 --> 02:09:05.920 head it helped me from 2020 up until now some of these subscribers aren't 02:09:05.920 --> 02:09:10.600 current anymore some of them are all of them are responsible for me being here 02:09:10.600 --> 02:09:16.000 thank you very much for your support thank you for sharing my word thank you 02:09:16.000 --> 02:09:22.080 for caring can love your neighbor I'll see you again tomorrow 02:09:46.000 --> 02:09:52.280 and so it sends out all these suppressors and