Oh look JC on the bike was timed out by Risa. Oh time out JC on the bike. JC on the bike.
01:16.000 --> 01:28.000
It's JC on the bike. It's JC on the bike yeah. Well I'm wise enough to know when a chomp needs banning and I know just the one.
01:28.000 --> 01:36.000
Look at round. It's JC on the bike. Who says Veda didn't study music in college?
01:36.000 --> 01:43.000
If you're not aware of the early COVID survivors website hosted by usatoniclive please check it out.
01:43.000 --> 01:51.000
The Mark Force podcast has been rocking lately. The last two episodes have been fantastic. It's an exciting list.
01:51.000 --> 01:57.000
It's an exciting list that as it populates seems to be really tying a lot of loose ends together.
01:57.000 --> 02:07.000
He's scheduled for 60 minutes next. He's going on French, British, Italian, Japanese television.
02:07.000 --> 02:17.000
People everywhere are starting to listen to him. It's embarrassing.
02:17.000 --> 02:32.000
We're considering doing a fundraiser for the early COVID survivors. Stay tuned. We might do a New Year's Eve telethon actually to raise money for the early COVID survivors.
02:32.000 --> 02:40.000
Just stay tuned to useatoniclive and to get your own biological for more details.
02:40.000 --> 03:09.000
I tell you those early COVID survivors they have endured everything that is imaginable in a martyr and a sacrificial lamb
03:09.000 --> 03:15.000
Also a victim of cancellation. I mean these people have suffered in ways that we can't understand.
03:15.000 --> 03:28.000
I'm really happy that Mark is calling attention to them while I simultaneously call attention to the biology that's gone out of black.
03:28.000 --> 03:33.000
That was a funny transition.
03:33.000 --> 03:42.000
The early COVID survivor, oh my goodness, I sent some sarcasm there.
Ladies and gentlemen, this is the faith we are trying to dispel. We got into the wrong car on this road, ladies and gentlemen. This is Gigaohm Biological.
Oh man, I don't know what to say about shedding. I don't like that topic very much.
04:12.000 --> 04:25.000
There is reasonable biological basis for shedding depending on how successful the the transfection is.
04:25.000 --> 04:35.000
There is reason to believe that shedding is possible. Just take an eat raw garlic for a few days and tell me that your sweat doesn't smell different.
04:35.000 --> 04:45.000
Tell me that your skin doesn't smell different and tell me that your body isn't excreting some of those compounds through your sweat glands and in your breath.
04:45.000 --> 04:55.000
And this isn't any different than a small protein or a protein fragment being shed part of an exosome or not.
04:56.000 --> 05:18.000
Shedding is something that it's hard to discount as wholly implausible, but on the other hand, what shedding does is it suggests that this technology is especially successful in producing protein and my guess is only in the best case scenario.
05:18.000 --> 05:30.000
But you know what, I'm just throwing things out there at this stage. We really don't know because transfection has never been adequately evaluated in this format in healthy people.
05:30.000 --> 05:38.000
And so I can wax intellectual all day long and so can everybody else. But the bottom line is that what you can expect is things to go wrong.
05:38.000 --> 05:44.000
Some of the things that go wrong there may include shedding, but I think most of the things that go wrong are going to be local.
05:44.000 --> 05:48.000
They're going to be things that go wrong with your own system.
05:48.000 --> 05:54.000
And those can include autoimmunity. Those could include protein misfolding.
05:54.000 --> 06:07.000
And I think that's why there were quite a few characters very early on in the narrative who were already seeding the idea that the novel spike protein or the bioweapon spike protein was capable of
06:07.000 --> 06:21.000
causing amyloid or capable of causing prion disease in the virus so that when the inevitable consequences of transfection were realized and amyloidosis was one of them or
06:21.000 --> 06:30.000
occasionally prion disease was one of them that this would already be covered by the viral story that was seeded at the very beginning of the pandemic.
06:30.000 --> 06:35.000
On a whole different sides of the internet using algorithmic plugging.
06:35.000 --> 06:41.000
And I think that's really what we're dealing with here is the our inability to see through the veil.
06:41.000 --> 06:49.000
You know, even even the idea that some of these people that picked us up on the road were innocent at some point.
06:49.000 --> 06:53.000
It's possible that none of them were ever not in on it.
06:53.000 --> 06:57.000
And so again, I can't stress enough how important it is that you share the work.
If you find it valuable, that's the best way that you can support Gigaohm biological, but Gigaohm biological is also supported through a subscriber base.
It's pretty limited, but to all of those people, I am very thankful and some of them have been contributing for several years now.
07:11.000 --> 07:18.000
And it's really the reason why I can't really hang up the stream and still think I need to keep fighting.
07:18.000 --> 07:26.000
I'm not saying that I'm going to quit, but it does make it much easier to keep going because it's a lot of hours and a lot of work.
07:26.000 --> 07:28.000
And so I really do appreciate it.
07:28.000 --> 07:31.000
But again, sharing the stream is most important.
07:31.000 --> 07:43.000
So I am not asking for financial donations off the top of my head, but just saying that I do receive them and I do accept them and they are valuable to me and my family.
07:44.000 --> 07:52.000
The gain of function worst case scenario is the thing we're mostly fighting now.
07:52.000 --> 07:59.000
And it is with great humility that I declare that this is what we're fighting.
08:00.000 --> 08:12.000
I'm not sure if I was by any stretch of the imagination, even close to the first person to articulate the gain of function in coronaviruses was a mythology.
08:12.000 --> 08:19.000
And I may even be guilty of resisting this idea for a while.
08:20.000 --> 08:26.000
And I'm feeling very humble about where I am now after four years.
08:26.000 --> 08:39.000
I think I could have been farther much earlier had there not been the significant level of meddling that went on behind the scenes and and in front of our eyes and in front of us on TV.
08:39.000 --> 08:43.000
And so here we are with six books that basically all tell the same story.
08:44.000 --> 09:01.000
I was able to contribute a little bit to the Wuhan cover up in the sense that there are infectious clones in there. There's RNA in lack of fidelity and RNA copying and there's a few other things in there that hint at the idea that coronaviruses may not be all there cracked up to be.
09:01.000 --> 09:04.000
But the book is still the same as every one of those books there.
09:04.000 --> 09:05.000
And I knew that from the beginning.
09:05.000 --> 09:10.000
The book was 70% written when I started.
09:10.000 --> 09:19.000
And so we're doing the best we can trying to push back against this, but we've all come to this realization too late.
09:19.000 --> 09:21.000
And so we've got extra work to do.
09:21.000 --> 09:28.000
We've got extra work to do because we've really got to push back on this novel virus because other people are not doing it.
09:28.000 --> 09:31.000
The people that are controlling the narrative are not doing it.
09:32.000 --> 09:41.000
And so I'm going to go back to this analogy because I really do think it's valuable and I'm going to keep telling it until I get it right.
09:41.000 --> 09:54.000
But you've got to think about the start of the pandemic is getting lost on the road in the middle of the night with some kind of new biological phenomenon floating over your head that you don't really understand you're all by yourself.
09:54.000 --> 10:01.000
And you're hoping that somebody's going to give you a ride somewhere, but you don't even know how you got on this road. You're just all isolated and confused.
10:01.000 --> 10:07.000
You don't have to go to work anymore. They're telling you that something going around that can kill your grandma.
10:07.000 --> 10:12.000
Maybe it was released from a laboratory according to some of the crazy people on the internet.
10:14.000 --> 10:18.000
And then some people came and picked you up and gave you a ride.
10:19.000 --> 10:28.000
It was a car full of people, though. It wasn't just one guy, but it was a person in the driver's seat, a person in the passenger seat, and a person in the backseat.
10:28.000 --> 10:32.000
And they offered you the fourth seat in the car.
10:33.000 --> 10:44.000
And who are these people? Well, they're these people that we all encountered on the internet in 2020 that we all thought were fighting for us in 2021.
10:45.000 --> 11:00.000
They picked us up in this car and basically bamboozled us with an illusion of consensus about a novel virus that killed millions of people that for which we had to do something that millions of people were saved from likely came from gain of function.
11:00.000 --> 11:05.000
And therefore will likely happen again. Only next time it'll be much worse.
11:05.000 --> 11:12.000
And so we've been riding in this car with people like who are on the last screen there.
11:13.000 --> 11:17.000
And some of them have unwittingly participated in this scheme.
11:17.000 --> 11:30.000
Others of them have participated in it and willingly as a result of their knowledge that we've been governed by this mythology for a long time, that it's always been the intention to govern us by this mythology.
11:32.000 --> 11:38.000
They have been preparing for this controlled demolition of the American system for quite some time.
11:39.000 --> 11:45.000
And I think we need to really seriously understand that the alarm is now.
11:45.000 --> 11:52.000
We don't have much time to pull out of the who and pull out of the UN and take our sovereignty back.
11:52.000 --> 12:02.000
We don't have that much time. It may already technically be impossible because of the way that the financial system has been legally orchestrated.
12:03.000 --> 12:27.000
At some point we're going to have to watch the Great Taking by David Webb because it may be the best description for how the financial system around the globe has been conscripted legally over the last decade to essentially make it possible to institute a governance structure above that of the national level without our ever being able to consent to it or not.
12:28.000 --> 12:41.000
And now what I want you to understand is that the people that picked you up on this road trip, the people that picked you up on this road trip may very well be aware that this is the intentional shift that's coming.
12:42.000 --> 12:46.000
Maybe even an inevitable one.
12:47.000 --> 13:07.000
We can't be sure exactly what kinds of forces are arrayed against us, but there are numbers of different competing piles of weaponized money, weaponized piles of money that are working against us and probably competing with each other at the same time behind this narrative.
13:08.000 --> 13:12.000
And so we don't even know which of the groups we got in the car with.
13:13.000 --> 13:30.000
Did we get in the car with the group that wants us to think that the baddest baddies are the Chinese or did we get in the group of the car that is working on behalf of the European interests or the city of London?
13:31.000 --> 13:38.000
Did we get into the car that's working on the interest of the large pharmaceutical companies, if that's even an interest?
13:39.000 --> 13:47.000
We don't even know what teams are in the background orchestrating this event to try and usurp our national sovereignty system.
13:48.000 --> 14:08.000
But somebody is, and many of these people who we have turned to for leadership are actually already aware that this transition is about to take place and are already aware and are auditioning for positions on the other side of that transition, I assure you.
14:09.000 --> 14:15.000
It is the only logical explanation for the drama that we have been subject to in this car ride.
14:16.000 --> 14:20.000
The drama about previous vaccinations and how sure they are that they work.
14:21.000 --> 14:32.000
The unquestioning of this novel virus jumping from species, the unquestioning use of PCR or asymptomatic spread, the unquestioning of the variants,
14:33.000 --> 14:41.000
and the unquestioning of gain of function research as a even greater danger than that of mother nature.
14:42.000 --> 14:48.000
And so this faith in a novel virus is fully safe from all these people that picked us up on this road.
14:49.000 --> 14:57.000
All these people that picked us up on this road are spreading the bad ideas that don't get us out and they're much more dangerous than any spreading RNA molecule.
14:58.000 --> 15:07.000
This illusion of consensus that they spread is much more dangerous because it gets people to behave irrationally to ditch their families.
15:10.000 --> 15:14.000
To go against what they should have known as common sense principles.
15:15.000 --> 15:21.000
To go against what they should have known about the sacredness of certain aspects of biology.
15:22.000 --> 15:29.000
It's not a matter of what is true that counts, but a matter of what is perceived to be true.
15:30.000 --> 15:32.000
That's what the intellectual dark web is all about.
15:33.000 --> 15:38.000
That's what these two guys right here brought Weinstein's right there.
15:39.000 --> 15:43.000
Brett Weinstein is right up there and then Dave Rubin is right here.
15:44.000 --> 15:45.000
Dave Rubin is right there.
15:45.000 --> 15:57.000
The original OG members of the intellectual dark web sitting at the original dinner table with Sam Harris and Eric Weinstein and Ben Shapiro and Joe Rogan.
16:00.000 --> 16:01.000
That's what this is.
16:02.000 --> 16:11.000
Pre-conceived limited spectrum of debate controlled by these guys who have a very lively debate within that spectrum.
16:12.000 --> 16:17.000
Listen to them give each other compliments like they weren't already on an organized team.
16:20.000 --> 16:21.000
This is just from like a few days ago.
16:22.000 --> 16:29.000
What you were doing and what we were all doing you know IDW doesn't exist.
16:30.000 --> 16:34.000
But it was a very important stage in something that I think doesn't have a name at the moment.
16:35.000 --> 16:57.000
What you were doing was somehow a prototype of what you are doing and I think there's meaningful progress if you look across that whole arc and anyway I appreciate it and I think it's important stuff so keep it up.
16:58.000 --> 16:59.000
I should probably end right there.
17:00.000 --> 17:13.000
And so that was just them plugging each other right and saying how great they are and how awesome they've been such dissidents and they're so confused by the current system and it's really great that you're such a leader and yada yada yada.
17:14.000 --> 17:15.000
We should do another show together.
17:16.000 --> 17:27.000
Well here's from today's podcast I've got it going at two times the speed and you're not even going to really notice it's just going to sound like Brett's talking into normal speed.
17:28.000 --> 17:46.000
Try to tolerate his verboseness and what he's basically going to do is walk you through the hypothetical of how do we tell if the number of people that are dying in our little anecdotal circle of friends and family is something significant.
17:47.000 --> 18:08.000
And then he doesn't really get very precise like he always doesn't and basically boils it down to either you died from the virus or you died from the shot and excess deaths are pretty high right now and he has no real explanation for that he doesn't try to delve into it at all.
And he wastes an awful lot of time not talking about Denis' data and for whatever reason he's not able to show the real graphs of Denis' data that show any significant findings.
He does say that Denis' name a couple times and he does say that it's worth looking at I don't know if there are links in the bottom of this video I highly doubt it he's not like you know going to tell you to go to DenisRancourt.com or anything like that.
And more importantly he's not going to delve into anything else that Denis has ever done even though he went all the way around the world to Romania and met Denis on stage.
He didn't bother to find out all the other things that Denis did including Denis' most powerful analysis of the data in America that shows that there's no geographic evidence of spread from one geographic center to another.
From one county to another the virus and these deaths do not cross state lines or county lines and that's a problem.
19:11.000 --> 19:17.000
And he's found this all over the world there is no real evidence of a spreading pathogen.
19:18.000 --> 19:40.000
And that's why there's no increase steady all-cause mortality increase in 2020 because the all-cause mortality increases that were said to be spread were so geographically isolated that on the average across the United States you don't really see a signal until the shot rolls out.
19:41.000 --> 19:49.000
That's very significant it's not the same as saying there was no all-cause mortality increase in 2020.
19:50.000 --> 19:57.000
It's very imprecise because in certain locations there were huge increases in all-cause mortality.
And so very very carefully now with very precise description of his data very very honest recapitulation of Denis' data would reveal those two things that excess deaths are higher after the shot and that there's no evidence of geographic spread in the excess deaths that we see in 2020.
And just like Robert Malone he is going to use it to exclusively talk about the increase in all-cause mortality that may be indirectly or directly related to the shot and talk about it as verbose and imprecisely as possible in order to make sure that in the end you're not really that curious about Denis' data.
So it's about ten minutes I'm going to try and let it play I just you know I might stop at once but I think I'm just going to let it play.
21:05.000 --> 21:07.000
And just remember what we're trying to listen for.
21:08.000 --> 21:22.000
We're trying to listen for an honest accounting of the fact that they killed people with ventilators with lack of antibiotics with misuse of steroids with the Remdesivir, Madazalam, and sending people back to the hospital.
21:23.000 --> 21:27.000
We're trying to get back to old folks homes instead of caring for them in hospitals.
21:27.000 --> 21:36.000
The list is quite substantial quite solid quite uniform across the United States and even in places around the world.
21:36.000 --> 21:51.000
So we really need to be honest in our accounting and it seems for some reason after four years the leaders of the intellectual dark web are still absolutely incapable of counting beyond the novel virus and beyond the
21:51.000 --> 21:55.000
intersection which they still can't find the word transfection for.
21:55.000 --> 21:57.000
After four years.
22:01.000 --> 22:07.000
Example OK the problem is if I'm stuck with my anecdotal encounter with the world and this pattern.
22:07.000 --> 22:12.000
We can do the same thing for the pattern of violence in our cities then I have no way of decisively answering the question.
22:12.000 --> 22:20.000
The only thing I can do is say does the pattern continue to match the does the pattern continue to anecdotally match the predictions of the model I have that there is something new and dangerous.
22:20.000 --> 22:25.000
If I say that loose there's no that loose is that loose in the world.
22:25.000 --> 22:29.000
Yeah, I have to do over I would just say loose in the world noted.
22:29.000 --> 22:35.000
Now is that already imprecise sorry I didn't know I wasn't going to stop it but that's already very imprecise right.
22:35.000 --> 22:42.000
He's already talking about something new and deadly loose in the world that's not very precise.
22:43.000 --> 22:58.000
That sure sounds like a virus to me it doesn't sound like a shot it doesn't sound like transfection or a methodology of gene gene manipulation or gene therapy that's being mislabeled or misused or mis.
22:58.000 --> 23:08.000
Applied to a healthy population it sounds like something is loose like biologically a pattern integrity loose on the I mean come on.
23:09.000 --> 23:13.000
I hope you can see this already how just painful this is.
23:13.000 --> 23:15.000
Awesome I feel we're making progress.
23:15.000 --> 23:22.000
So what I wanted to do now is show what you do if you actually want to take that anecdotal pattern and the hypothesis that results from it and get rigorous.
23:22.000 --> 23:35.000
And if you would show there was a excellent talk at the COVID summit in Romania I'm not going to show you the talk it's worth the 25 minutes or so to watch it but this is Dennis Raincourt that's what it looked like in the auditorium.
23:35.000 --> 23:50.000
And Dennis Raincourt is a physicist who has gone and analyzed the all cause mortality data from around the world he's looked at countries different countries he's looked at very different timescales and so here take a look this is the pattern of all cause mortality
23:50.000 --> 23:55.000
by month over a hundred years 70.
23:55.000 --> 24:03.000
What you'll see is a pattern of spikes and troughs that your mind will correctly register as highly regular.
24:03.000 --> 24:10.000
Now what that highly regular pattern is is an oscillation of seasons and for reasons that Raincourt correctly points out are not fully understood.
24:10.000 --> 24:16.000
There is an increasing all cause mortality that means we don't care what you died of the question is we just count deaths and we look at the pattern.
24:16.000 --> 24:22.000
People tend to die in the winter and they tend to die much less in the summer and the exact reason for that is not perfectly understood.
24:22.000 --> 24:39.000
Now I would argue that the likely explanation for this is somewhere in the neighborhood of we all have some proximity to death at every moment a force with which the grave pulls at us.
24:39.000 --> 24:41.000
That force is quite strong.
24:41.000 --> 24:51.000
So is he he's anthropomorphizing the grave as it pulls on you and generates this seasonal variability in death.
24:51.000 --> 25:10.000
He's wasting I mean this is at double speed he's wasting time explaining people the reasonably well understood or accepted phenomenon that the death rate fluctuates seasonally it could be a combination of a lot of things we understand that.
There's no reason to waste any time on it unless the whole idea is to tire you out so that the actual impact of anything that Denis Rancourt has done will be lost on you because number one he's not going to show it to you and number two he's not going to tell it to you and number three.
He's going to use an extraordinary number of words not to tell or show you it.
25:34.000 --> 25:36.000
In the first year of life.
25:36.000 --> 25:49.000
It decreases radically over that year if you survive to one year of age that force pulling you towards the grave tends to be flat until you reach the age of sexual maturity at which point it begins to very gradually on an accelerating pattern increase until it's quite precipitous.
25:49.000 --> 25:58.000
Late in life and then there is arguably a plateau largely due to what is likely a decrease in your risk of cancer if you live through the period in which cancer has skyrocketed.
25:58.000 --> 26:06.000
In any case interesting that the data if you plot it out reveal this highly regular pattern and as predicted this is a northern hemisphere this is France data you're looking at here.
26:06.000 --> 26:17.000
Very interesting and of course necessary that it be this way if we look at the southern hemisphere where the pattern of seasons is inverted then the pattern of spikes and drops is inverted as it would have to be otherwise the explanation would be falsified by it.
26:17.000 --> 26:20.000
So anyway that's what the general pattern looks like.
26:20.000 --> 26:23.000
Can you show the next graph.
26:23.000 --> 26:27.000
Okay so maybe I didn't capture the other graph you want to show his bulleted list.
26:27.000 --> 26:32.000
So here's I don't know what you mean said his son Zach.
26:32.000 --> 26:39.000
So he had one graph and it was a graph that went up to 2020 so actually he showed nothing.
26:39.000 --> 26:50.000
He showed absolutely nothing of the rise of all cause mortality none nothing significant here has been shown not one graph has been shared.
You think if you went all the way around the world and met this guy and saw this brilliant presentation that you either would have gotten more slides which I think are downloadable.
27:27.000 --> 27:37.000
If you really wanted to share the data you might have learned to present it a little better maybe chosen to successive figures to make the point.
27:37.000 --> 27:42.000
But you know that the dark horse podcast never does that.
27:42.000 --> 27:45.000
These figures are tough.
27:45.000 --> 27:54.000
Teaching anything is not the goal here it's just you know to wax intellectual for a while.
27:54.000 --> 27:58.000
It's to run out the clock is what we're starting to think it is.
27:58.000 --> 28:01.000
We're basically just running out the clock.
28:01.000 --> 28:04.000
Tell the next big thing whatever is going to happen.
28:05.000 --> 28:13.000
Cyber war crash of the internet bring in the digital currency for everybody that wants bread I don't know.
28:13.000 --> 28:18.000
But these people seem to be running out the clock.
28:18.000 --> 28:32.000
When really what we need to be doing is pulling the fire alarm and saying we need to get out of the who we need to get out of the UN we need to take back our treasury we need to figure out how we are going to fix this problem in the United States without the guidance
28:32.000 --> 28:44.000
and the help of these people in these banks and in these corporations in these commercial banks that have completely bankrupt the United States.
28:44.000 --> 29:01.000
I'm not an economist I'm not some kind of finance guy but I definitely know that fractional reserve banking has been abused for too many hundreds of years and abused in such a way as to sap all of the real value and wealth from the United States.
29:02.000 --> 29:05.000
It's gone already probably.
29:05.000 --> 29:14.000
And so it's up to us each and every one of us Americans to regain ownership over our country.
29:14.000 --> 29:23.000
And I don't have a good plan for how to do it but I assure you that these people are running out the clock on that idea they are not interested in that idea.
29:23.000 --> 29:33.000
So if we've got some good ideas let's start throwing them out there let's send emails let's talk about it let's figure out how to do it if we've got to run for office then we've all got to do it.
29:33.000 --> 29:38.000
Maybe Mark Koolack needs to run in Massachusetts I don't know.
29:38.000 --> 29:46.000
Maybe we can find a person to run in every state I don't know maybe something has to happen though because this is not working anymore.
29:47.000 --> 29:56.000
These people are not helping us anymore we are hamsters in a wheel with these people.
29:56.000 --> 30:08.000
And these people are responsible for the worst case scenario narrative that kept us all trapped that fooled us all into thinking that the mystery to solve was whether this was a gain of function or lab leak not whether anybody was killing anybody.
30:08.000 --> 30:13.000
And so let's listen to see if Brett knows how many people have been killed or even cares.
30:13.000 --> 30:31.000
The upshot from this extremely carefully done research and I want to call your attention to especially number five number four on this list 17 million vaccine deaths worldwide to the present plus or minus half a million.
30:31.000 --> 30:36.000
That is incredibly high number and of course the number of inoculations given was staggering.
30:36.000 --> 30:43.000
Obviously we're not just talking about billions of people who were inoculated but many of them inoculated multiple times elsewhere in this talk and again I encourage you to go look at it.
30:43.000 --> 30:53.000
He points out that the risk goes up rather precipitously with the number of doses you've had becoming quite high at the fourth dose.
30:53.000 --> 31:00.000
Interesting I wasn't there I was going to talk but the fifth point on this list fatal toxicity is exponential with age with risk of death doubling every 45 years of age.
31:00.000 --> 31:14.000
That is not counter to but is the the opposite direction of what we have talked about anecdotally what it seems to be the case not with regard to fatality but adverse events wherein in 2022 when we were talking about the insanity of giving
31:14.000 --> 31:27.000
these vaccines to young people the point was that COVID is simultaneously a disease that does not affect the young very much see in 2022 to be talking about the insanity of giving it to young people was not talking about the insanity of giving it to
31:27.000 --> 31:32.000
the old people.
31:32.000 --> 31:56.000
It was not talking about the insanity of treating any old person for the circulating virus that there is no evidence for so there's still an acceptance of the narrative in 2022 if you're arguing for the little kids not getting the shot you still haven't figured it out
31:56.000 --> 32:14.000
that the shot should have never been justified for anyone because they killed people and the fact that they used Remdesivir and lack of antibiotics and misuse of steroids and Madazzalam in the UK and elsewhere and all of this other stuff to create
32:14.000 --> 32:34.000
these local mass casualty events that were misconstrued as spread using models and exaggeration on TV and lack of context with regard to all cause mortality that's how they justified this and they don't seem to be wanting to be aware of that
32:35.000 --> 32:44.000
they don't want to acknowledge that in order for this to have been rolled out they needed to kill people
32:44.000 --> 32:54.000
and at the very very least every single one of us that was trying to figure this out in 2020 but didn't quite get there needs to admit that we we bought into this
32:55.000 --> 33:07.000
we bought it hook, line and sinker that something was going around that we could test for even if we thought that well the tests aren't perfect we still thought we could test for it
33:07.000 --> 33:21.000
we still told people that something was going around we still talked about natural immunity to that thing that was still going around I wrote a review about the thing going around
33:21.000 --> 33:27.000
the reason why I wrote that review is because of people like Brett Weinstein
33:27.000 --> 33:33.000
because of people like Brett Weinstein agreeing wholeheartedly with everything that was on television
33:33.000 --> 33:40.000
everything that was on social media going along with the masks going along with the social distancing
33:40.000 --> 33:48.000
wondering about the possibilities of a lab leak in a worst case scenario
33:48.000 --> 33:58.000
lots of other people were doing it too lots of other people were in my circle of influencers people contacting me on the net telling me that's going to be a billion people dead you better be careful
33:58.000 --> 34:10.000
about how you say this because you could be responsible for the death of thousands or even millions of people by talking like you're talking right now Mr. Cooey
34:11.000 --> 34:24.000
and now in retrospect what I see are people that were meddling that were making sure that people who questioned the possibility of a worst case scenario were terrified to do so
34:24.000 --> 34:29.000
and so all of these people are complicit in this murder all of them
34:30.000 --> 34:46.000
I tried my best to figure it out I tried my best to find out who was lying and it took me almost three years to get to the stage where I finally realized that maybe Mark Bailey wasn't wrong about COVID
34:47.000 --> 34:56.000
maybe Andy Kaufman wasn't wrong about them being able to not isolate and purify this virus
35:02.000 --> 35:08.000
but then I think myself and I get back there and I think what in the hell happened then
35:08.000 --> 35:14.000
why was it so hard for me to come to the realization that they were lying about this
35:14.000 --> 35:20.000
why was it so hard for me to see through and then I look back and I think about all the people that I met
35:20.000 --> 35:24.000
all the people that were talking to me behind the scenes
35:24.000 --> 35:27.000
all the people that were in the car with me
35:31.000 --> 35:36.000
and those people aren't insignificant people they're people that everybody on this watching this stream
35:36.000 --> 35:40.000
everybody of the two thousand people that will watch this stream in the next day
35:40.000 --> 35:44.000
they all know it they all know who these people are
35:46.000 --> 35:52.000
who had me on their podcasts and broadcasts and on their panels
35:55.000 --> 36:00.000
the illusion of consensus was strong on signal
36:00.000 --> 36:08.000
the illusion of consensus was strong on these apps and in these videos and in these forums
