Oh, the next thing that I want to say is our lack of biological knowledge and the general poor health of the, of America, of the American people is being used to create the crisis.
that they are combining our lack of biological knowledge and our general society's lack of good health and access to health care to create a crisis to usher in all kinds of changes that would otherwise never be necessary and more importantly never be possible.
And, you know, anything with really rapidly fading efficacy, such that you need shots within a year, you know, Canada's saying nine months, is as actually J.J.
The American women's sevens rugby team, if you haven't checked that out, check it out.
06:19.088 --> 06:22.952
Talk about a last second win.
06:23.092 --> 06:35.382
And so I think it's still possible, even though America has been behind the ball for many years now, because our government and our biosecurity state has been at the forefront of this illusion.
06:36.282 --> 06:44.408
creating it, laying down the groundwork in people's minds in Hollywood and in the NIH.
06:45.869 --> 06:57.157
We really are at the stage now where I think we can make a real play to have the average person understand why intramuscular injection of any combination of substances with the intent of augmenting the immune system is dumb.
06:57.637 --> 07:02.121
Transfection in healthy humans was always criminally negligent and RNA cannot pandemic.
07:02.521 --> 07:03.682
I'm really excited to be here.
07:03.702 --> 07:04.783
My name is Jonathan Cooley.
07:04.803 --> 07:06.345
I live in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
07:06.745 --> 07:09.107
I used to be a career academic biologist.
07:09.147 --> 07:10.968
I wanted tenure and all those good things.
07:11.749 --> 07:22.618
The name of this show is derived from gigaohm, a measure of resistance that I used to try to achieve as I made these recordings depicted here and described here.
07:23.799 --> 07:29.902
Um, welcome again to the show where we understand that the mystery virus isn't responsible for the excess deaths.
07:30.383 --> 07:32.804
We understand it's a much longer list of things.
07:33.584 --> 07:37.566
Um, and we were led by our noses and we've been running in hamster wheels.
07:37.906 --> 07:42.729
Um, and that's the reason why almost nobody realizes that there's no epidemiological evidence of spread.
07:43.249 --> 07:53.195
And almost no one is talking about how easily we can fix this problem by simply instilling strict liability again and restoring our Seventh Amendment right to sue for damages.
07:53.615 --> 07:55.976
We need a new consensus about transfection.
07:56.016 --> 08:01.580
We need a new consensus about the vaccine schedule in America and about what RNA can and can't do.
08:01.640 --> 08:06.963
And that's what GigaOM Biological is going to try to do, point to the murder and the lies.
08:07.023 --> 08:10.205
It's these people, ladies and gentlemen, these people have decided
08:10.925 --> 08:13.006
to, whoops, darn, I cut that wrong again.
08:14.067 --> 08:17.930
These people have decided and some of them are participating wittingly.
08:18.010 --> 08:19.831
Some of them are way in over their heads.
08:19.891 --> 08:22.252
Some of them still don't know how over their head they are.
08:23.253 --> 08:27.716
Others of them are trying desperately to distance themselves from what they've done.
08:28.136 --> 08:35.241
And the way that they do it is by keeping you focused on the COVID shot and not asking any questions about what they were up to in 2020 and before.
08:37.202 --> 08:47.449
And as long as you go on to social media and climb into your chair and decide how you're going to retweet and tweet to save the universe, you're effectively caught in their trap.
08:47.489 --> 08:52.333
And it doesn't matter what social media app you use or where you share your information.
08:52.433 --> 08:54.194
These are the people who are going to rise.
08:54.614 --> 09:01.219
These are the people who are going to rise independent of what you do and how good your stream is or how hard you write your sub stack.
09:01.619 --> 09:03.120
These are the people that are going to rise.
09:03.180 --> 09:03.881
Those are the people
09:04.441 --> 09:08.228
that are going to share each other and never going to share you.
09:08.268 --> 09:16.083
And that's because they serve the weaponized piles of money that are currently using social media to convince us what to argue about and with whom to argue.
09:17.586 --> 09:34.373
And as long as you argue with whom they want you to argue, or even worse, sit back in your chair and listen to the people that they want you to listen to argue, then you will accept the premises of their narrative because you'll be asking and arguing about the questions that they want you to argue about.
09:34.814 --> 09:40.976
And the unfortunate thing is, is that people like Noam Chomsky and Edward Bernays have been telling us this for decades.
09:41.657 --> 09:46.759
And unfortunately, we are the generation that finally the cage is closing.
09:47.460 --> 09:49.385
and the mythology is complete.
09:49.466 --> 09:51.892
In other words, almost everything that we believe
09:53.183 --> 10:03.031
about how the American government works, about how banks work, about how universities work, about hospitals work, and about how the dollar works is all a mythology.
10:03.071 --> 10:05.593
And on top of all of that is public health.
10:06.113 --> 10:07.554
And so that's really where we are.
10:07.594 --> 10:12.798
That's why it's so difficult to try to give an opening presentation every day.
10:13.299 --> 10:18.943
And instead, we're oftentimes just kind of stuck, you know, saying that, hey, here we are trapped on a starship.
10:21.145 --> 10:21.965
Hold on one second.
10:21.985 --> 10:22.846
Let me just answer this.
10:26.223 --> 10:26.784
Hello, sir.
10:26.804 --> 10:31.209
Hey, I just wanted to bounce some ideas off of you.
10:31.389 --> 10:32.430
I'm live.
10:32.650 --> 10:33.491
I'm live right now.
10:33.531 --> 10:36.555
But maybe you want to just say hello to everybody and let them know what you're up to.
10:38.697 --> 10:39.739
Oh.
10:40.820 --> 10:42.442
I think they already recognize your voice.
10:46.621 --> 11:09.270
I was just gonna go over some of the 2020 2021 timeline I Think some of the evidence that Judy Mike of its and Robert Malone are longtime colluders might have Some evidence might be that Well, obviously they both work with that Who's that producer?
11:10.110 --> 11:13.091
Gosh darn it Mickey Mickey Mickey something something
11:16.897 --> 11:24.488
The book was planned, the production was all done, it was pretty much certain that she was going to be the big face of the show.
counter-narrative in 2020 but Malone wasn't Malone was a behind-the-scenes kind of guy and Malone didn't come out till 2021 and I think the fact that they've never they try not to share the stage together but they both work with Willis and they're also both kind of tight with this former Feds group and that's what I'm really focusing on right now they're this I shared some stuff with
The sort of, you know, once you get converted to understanding what's going on, once you see the chair with the joystick and the goggles that you've been sitting in and you actually take those goggles off and you take your hand off the joystick, it starts to become a very, very quick learning experience.
And so here we are, also in the same year, this time at Harvard, having a discussion with five people on the panel, some of whom contributed to the making of that movie.
with daily shows like Giga Home Biological, daily shows that ask questions like this, even in the best case scenario, they need to titrate us to the truth at best because otherwise there will be a flood and they will look foolish.
And so, so much of our narrative over the last three years has been sucked up by these people that we've been paying a lot of attention to and I've been screaming and yelling about, but
What I think is most important now for me personally, and maybe for a lot of the people that watch, is to really reflect on when we didn't know what was going on.
When I saw the PBS NewsHour yesterday, thinking that it was from 2017, that was when my family and I were already in the United States and could have seen that on television.
You really can reflect back and realize how much of my cognitive energy was wholly focused on the kinds of things that I, all the things that I was busy with at Pitt.
And in the meantime, parents really having to deal with the vaccine schedule, really having to deal with vaccine injury are the only ones in this little bubble that of course moves temporarily through space and time in our culture where only the people who are
dealing with newborn babies to year two are confronted with this what would obviously be an incongruity for any adult like any parent once you have a kid you understand there's a different kind of thing if it's your kid or a kid
And there's a lot of evidence for it in the brain of animals that we've studied where whole new windows of synaptic plasticity open up in the males that have babies.
In theory, the vaccine schedule in America could be made perfectly safe and even more profitable by simply putting saline into those shots if they're indeed not doing anything for anyone ever.
And so we really need to look at this, I think, with wide open eyes now and try to see where we were and how we got here and realize that it was a very steady ramp.
But what we're finding out is that these lies were being told in a ramp up to the pandemic, not in a ramp up of a couple months, like, you know, they started with DEVENT 201 in October of 2019.
I'm talking about 10 years earlier, 15 years earlier, where they started to write the papers about pandemic potential, started to speculate about pandemic potential, started to build laboratory models about pandemic potential.
started to build laboratory models about viral detection and viral sequencing and viral ecology and all these other things, which established this whole mythology, the basis of the idea of a pandemic.
Today's panelists, starting from my immediate right, are Seth Mnookin, Associate Director of MIT's Graduate Program in Science Writing and author of The Panic Virus, The True Story Behind the Vaccine Autism Controversy.
While most Americans do vaccinate their children and routinely follow recommendations, some are now choosing to alter the recommended schedule themselves or select specific vaccines they will allow to be given to their children.
And they have this proxy, which is antibodies or seroprevalence that the government and the FDA and the CDC and the biosecurity state has allowed to become a standard which defines immunity both in the context of medicine and in the context of public health.
And because all of these people have a vested interest in not understanding it, because otherwise their career will crash, most of these people don't bother understanding it, because what little part that they have to understand isn't very hard.
You heard that that author down there at the far end here, where I use my arrow, that guy right there, I don't know if you can see that or not, that guy right there was an author of a book called The Panic Virus.
when your children are healthy or your children are through this crucial window of development, the odds of you noticing the injury rather than just thinking it's an allergy or a rash or eczema or whatever other things, acne, whatever they get is lower and lower and lower because the temporal correlation will most likely go away.
And so unless a teenager is severely injured, all the other symptoms that are probably attributable to some of these older vaccines that are very, very, very toxic.
And of course, public health has every incentive and has billions of dollars aimed at making sure that whether it's 1% of the problem or 100% of the problem, that the vaccine schedule is never considered
And because it's this thing, and it's mostly genes, and it's mostly what, then you immediately, it's all about just convincing people to understand one thing and one thing only, that the vaccines can't be to blame.
such an understanding of the immune system that we have wiped out childhood diseases as a result of using vaccines, and that the vaccines can't possibly change in quality, in quantity, in content.
Well, one thing I think is interesting is we're dealing with a generation that, for the most part, has not seen the effects of vaccine-preventable diseases.
I don't even know how we came up with this when they're talking about the alternate vaccine schedules, which is one of the things I find so shocking because we do know how we actually came up with the vaccine schedule that is recommended.
those parents are doing are leaving their children vulnerable at the exact moment when all of those vaccine-preventable diseases are going to potentially do the most harm.
So, but, you know, I think in addition to their not having seen... And so they don't make any consideration for the fact that the earlier you push back an intramuscular injection of any combination of substances,
with the intent of augmenting the immune system, the earlier you push it back, the more likely it is that you're going to interfere with an uninterruptible process in development, and that that will have cascading effects for the rest of that child's life.
Just think about it from the perspective of being a retired 65-year-old man who's decided that he's gonna try heroin versus a six-month-old baby who you've decided you want to have try heroin.
acknowledged in neuroscience in general to extend all the way to the early 20s for our young people, that augmenting their immune system with the possibility of interfering with the ongoing development of not their liver, but their brain is a pretty amazing arrogance.
If we were really to appreciate the irreducible complexity and the sacred biology that are our teenagers, then as they go through puberty, when their body is trying to completely reorganize the synaptic structure of their brain from a young animal to an adult form,
that we have no concept or clue of what's actually going on there, but we just know that it's a waterfall cascade across metabolic pathways for like four or five or six, sometimes seven years.
And this is the kind of biological truth that these people should be telling and preaching from the rooftops, that when a baby comes out, the reason why you can't just put it outside in a little house with a bowl of water and food is because it is still way, way, way developing and still requires incredible amount of social, physical,
Is it impossible to imagine that if you raised a baby in a shoebox and never had any physical contact with it, that it might be slightly different than a baby who wasn't?
And so then is it so difficult to understand why augmenting the immune system with a combination of substances injected intramuscularly at six months and then at seven months and at eight months and then at nine months for the next six months until they've been augmented or injected 28 times might be a little arrogant?
light of the complex process that's happening before our eyes that maybe the first thing we should have done is focused on making sure that that mom is fully facilitated in her maximum ability to be able to breastfeed and care for that child in a stress-free way.
They're just, they just think that childhood is all dependent on whether or not you got measles or whether you're not, you got whooping cough or even worse, whether you saw people who got it.
In a lot of these diseases, you also saw there some skepticism, some larger skepticism about expertise, about doctors in some situations, so a lot going on.
Remember Brett told us about a sort of hybrid herd immunity where a combination of vaccines and infection and clever use of prophylactics like ivermectin could essentially bring us back to zero COVID, which was a goal in June of 2021 that he still thought was very attainable and worthwhile, maybe even to the point of forced drugging a nation.
If we didn't have the high vaccination levels that we do, you know, in New York City and even in this community, I can promise you we would have had hundreds if not thousands of cases.
So the whole concept of a vaccine is to help people, particularly kids, develop an immune response against a germ that threatens, ultimately, their lives.
I mean, it's the only example where a disease, smallpox, has been eradicated from the face of the earth, and I think it's hard for you to imagine, but there were 50 million
From one year to the next, a disease that was afflicting one in 200 kids completely disappeared from our state, from pretty much every state in the U.S.
information or antigenic material available in that vaccine is actually the diphtheria toxin and so any antibodies that are said to be indicative of that vaccine working are much more likely to be specific for the diphtheria toxin than they are for the Hib
protein itself, and I would be willing to bet dollars to donuts that when they evaluated the effectiveness of these products that targeted that and used this combination of the diphtheria toxin and Hib
protein that they were looking at, polyclonal antibodies that could pull down any portion of that protein, which again doesn't necessarily provide immunity.
It's another interesting thing is that the Hib vaccine in at least some databases that I have seen, I'm not sure it's smart for me to say which databases I've seen,
These are both basically the same formulation and they are both shit and they are both associated with a high number of vaccine reported injuries in the childhood schedule.
And so it's very curious to me that in 2014, this guy's talking about it when one of the worst of those vaccines was actually in use and later pulled from the market.
From one year to the next, a disease that was afflicting one in 200 kids completely disappeared from our state, from pretty much every state in the US and then in Western Europe.
And that was a dramatic transformation, such that today when we talk to residents or physicians and we mention Haemophilus influenzae type B disease, the greatest majority of them have never seen a case and don't even consider it as even a possibility.
And what I have noticed is very similar to the tape, which is that in general, I'm seeing a patient population that is sort of inclined to get vaccinated.
Maybe the way that it works is they, they roll out a test and for a few years, they're telling all these pediatricians to test for this and see how prevalent it is.
And then after a few years, if the test says that it's prevalent all the time in the, in the ICUs of hospitals, they can argue that they need to roll out a vaccine.
And I think it's something very interesting, because in many ways, as clinicians, as physicians, we participate in the confusion that one of the individuals portrayed in the clip showed, where if we say yes, we might start changing the schedule to accommodate your child, we are sort of acquiescing to the idea that this may not be safe, and let's manipulate
Any recognition of the complexity of the problem, any recognition of the sacredness of early childhood development, both from a biological perspective, but also from a neurobiological perspective, from a metabolic perspective, from an allergies perspective, from any number of perspectives, it just makes very good sense up until
Do you understand the implications of that simple statement that a country like Norway or Sweden, or even the Netherlands will basically go, okay, well, if you're going to breastfeed, don't worry.
But here we have people on stage at Harvard that are creating the illusion of consensus that the only responsible position to take is that the earlier the better.
We got a lot of work to do, because this is how people got to the stage where in 2020, when Brett Weinstein went on his show with a bandana around his face and then wood shop goggles on to explain how he goes to the store, and they were already here before the pandemic, then boom.
Not only were they not going to get out, but they were going to take the TV seriously because even the batshit crazy people on the intellectual dark web are agreeing with them.
So I think in many ways, we participate in the confusion when we try to accommodate fears that are probably best dealt with scientifically rather than emotionally.
Merck and Harvard to become a health decision scientist and figure out why it is that people don't think that we can use a vaccine to cure a virus that causes cervical cancer, like all of them, and all the anus and penis cancer too.
So the vaccine really caught on as an STD vaccine, which automatically makes the issues, the subject a little more touchy, a little bit more controversial.
I think over the past couple of years, there's really been an effort with communication and education, a turning of the tides to raise awareness that this is really an anti-cancer vaccine.
Because we don't want parents to think that it's a sexually transmitted disease we're trying to prevent so that we're enabling their kids to have sex younger.
See, they are telling you what the limited spectrum of debate is, that if you trap parents in that limited spectrum of debate, they'll basically have no choice but to take your recommendation.
I think over the past couple of years, there's really been an effort with communication and education, a turning of the tides to raise awareness that this is really an anti-cancer vaccine.
This vaccine requires three doses over a six-month period, so we're really... In order for our highly orchestrated augmentation of your teenager's healthy immune system to work properly, these doses have to be given in a strict regimen in a six-month time window because we understand exactly what's going on and if it doesn't happen in that six-month time window, then it won't work.
I mean, it's really important to understand that we have such an intricate understanding of how these vaccines work that some of them only need one every few years.
placing a burden on parents and the vaccine recipients themselves to come back to the health clinic for multiple visits at a time when they wouldn't otherwise be intersecting with the health care system.
So I think in talking about how to increase the rates of HPV vaccination and other vaccines, we'll really need to figure out how to overcome these logistical challenges to make the vaccines more accessible.
So I do think that there is some kind of discounting of health benefits that we attribute to HPV vaccination compared to these other childhood vaccines.
We've also been the victim of our own success in that we've had pap smear screening programs for decades that have dramatically reduced the incidence and burden of cervical cancer.
Don't talk about the toxins that are in their processed food or their breakfast cereals or the soft drinks that they drink or the energy drinks that they do or all the other supplements that are around nowadays or the cosmetics that girls buy.
And so we need to talk about vaccination against measles and against whooping cough and a couple other things that are really vital in my humble opinion.
Now, when we do these things, it's going to be really important when we open this window of vulnerability to your immune system, it's going to be really vital that the microbiome of your daughter is in the proper state, that her body is properly detoxed.
So that the only possible antigenic signal that your daughter's body would have available to it are the signals that we are going to provide via the oral vaccine and the cream that we're going to put on her.
you're going to be on it, she's going to be on a very strict diet, she's going to have to do a couple things like that, but you know, there's a whole list.
And then if you've checked off all of those things, then we can start the battery of exposure, which will go across three weeks and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
This is a fantasy world where vaccines do work and they do open a window of opportunity in your immune system, but then the doctors understand that the complexity of this is not to be underestimated, and so they take all kinds of measures for three weeks to make sure
that this young, already pretty developed child at age four is properly detoxed and properly sterile, if you will, from an immunological perspective so that they are ready to be augmented.
And I really think that if you just start to imagine, if you really believe the thing, if these people really believe the things that they are saying and really understood the immune system and our physiology as a whole for the irreducible complexity that it is, then they would at least have the respect for what they were about to do so that they would have already been at least what I just described there.
very respectful of what they were about to try to accomplish and very aware that, you know, when we immunize your child, we're opening up a window that if you make a mistake and expose them to the wrong thing, it could permanently augment them in a way that we don't want.
that most of these pathogens that are characterized with fancy names are really just symptomologies that have been misconstrued as having pathogens which track with them.
I would say, Susie, that one of the reasons why they really discourage or let's say don't encourage breastfeeding is because of that, because it's a social, they're creating dissociative behavior.
of with the numbers that I've cited and that we know that have wiped out these diseases, as you heard in the film, why would anybody hesitate vaccinating their kids?
So it's very hard to develop a strategy if, in fact, we actually don't know what the values that people are bringing when they come to the pediatrician and say, I don't want to use my kid as a pin cushion.
So I think there's a huge need for evidence that everybody can believe that would help doctors, Rick and all other pediatricians, and people who work in their offices, who actually often meet with the parents, to do a better job of anticipating their concerns.
I mean, one of the reasons why Barry and I led the workshop that put together this report was because we both had had the experience of being asked to participate in a conference, a workshop, a meeting about vaccine hesitancy and trying to figure out why people were hesitant.
And I think we both realized, I realized very starkly that here we were discussing and debating why it was people made decisions based on instinct and not on reason, but we had no data in front of us.
if the best approach is to change the subject, which it actually might be, or to sit down and talk to them, or to say, you know what, I'm vaccinating your children, end of conversation.
the subject, which it actually might be, or to sit down and talk to them, or to say, you know what, I'm vaccinating your children, end of conversation.
Pediatricians are also very frustrated because they're put in a position where in a 15 minute wellness appointment, when they have A through Z that they also need to cover, they're being asked to address these really fundamental concerns about their child's health.
Under no circumstances are they debating the variable effectiveness of different vaccines, the different necessity for different vaccines, because all of these diseases are deadly.
At a certain moment, you're on your knees and then you stand up and you walk to the front of the church and you take a wafer and you take a drink and you come back around and you get back on your knees.
You can't ask questions about why you're there except for, you know, you're on your knees because you're in the presence of something that then goes away and so then you're not to be on your knees anymore.
See what Jane thinks about this is when you look at the analogy of the hepatitis B vaccine, which is in fact a vaccine that is targeting a sexually transmitted infection that will lead to many problems, including cirrhosis and possibly also hepatocellular carcinoma.
This is a vaccine that really in many ways is very similar to the HPV vaccine with one, even another similarity, which was originally introduced in adolescence and then shuttled down to the very young.
And these four adults, or five adults, are pretending to have some basic biological understanding that edifies their better understanding of vaccines than the rest of the people in the room.
Perhaps because you have to actively do it, because otherwise you don't even know it's coming, and before your baby's even made any noises, two needles have gone in her ass.
I think the question about whether- It also, of course, implies that every other cancer could, in theory, have a vaccine if we could just find the pesky virus that causes them.
that we can kind of change the schedule so that we can bring it down to the infant schedule, which would be, I think, maybe place less emphasis on HPV vaccination right before your child starts having sex.
I thought she was a health decision scientist, but somehow or another, she's really up to date on the HPV trials, and HPV testing, and HPV experiments, and wow.
I think one of the things that I would like to see, if we had the kind of research data that Seth has talked about, and we know what parental concerns are, doctors
And so we're training doctors where it is accepted the kids don't get these diseases, and vaccines is not high on how to train doctors to deal with the problem.
This school, as you know, is famous for Atul Gawande, who has checklists for surgery and checklists for all kinds of things that are not checklists that you tick off, but they're points where
I would love to see, with the basis of the evidence that we hope is acquired, that every doctor and every person in the doctor's office that meets with parents that have to vaccinate kids will just run through a checklist so they know how not to offend people, how not to dictate to them, and how to engage them in actively understanding why it's good to do this.
I think some of you may have experienced, if you have children, that the pediatrician now often just lists the vaccines, and then some other health care provider, like a nurse practitioner or a physician
Well, it's of course misleading parents because otherwise they would be using the words informed consent and talking about how and where the line of informed consent is and how to get parents across it.
And I think some of these solutions like one of my friends took a law school class with Cass Sunstein, setting up a clear educational program for for physicians and training on how to approach it, and really not leave it, for example, for the end when everybody is rushed and time really is running
But I mean, really, just the fact that the physician is walking out as this is about to happen, and some practices do it differently, but in several, it's really sort of like almost an afterthought.
His job is really at that point not to engage in a very thoughtful, they don't have time, they could, but they don't have time to engage in a very thoughtful conversation.
So maybe to be able to triage that information a little bit so that when the provider intersects with that patient, to really get down to the bottom of, you know, what is concerning so you don't have to run down the whole thing and the whole gamut and actually instill more fear in the parents, which might, you know, actually happen if you're talking about autism and that didn't even register.
And another issue I think we've run into by not initiating that conversation in a health care setting until after the child is born is that parent has already been primed.
I also, because it's so difficult to... Yeah, I think it's important to point out what Catherine is pointing out in the chat, that really right now we've gone 10 years farther than this.
And we are now encouraging pregnant moms to take vaccines to protect their babies as opposed to probably where we were in 2014, which is, you know, don't use cosmetics and don't eat raw fish and don't eat unpasteurized cheese because your baby is in development.
And so that is part of the reason why I think it's important to go back to these videos that are 10 years old so that you can see that it hasn't been a shift that suddenly occurred because of a pandemic.
But it's been a steady, gradual shift from where we were when we were kids and where this messaging was when we were kids to the point now where young pregnant women are being encouraged by their healthcare providers to take a battery of vaccines, which is absolutely terrible.
So instead of every pediatrician and every nurse practitioner feeling like, I need to be up on all of the crazy conspiracy theories that have popped up today, you can have one person.
Would it be like that lady Kim over there who works on health decision science, or would it be somebody who is an immunologist and who is capable of adequately explaining the pros and cons of it, or the potential dangers of it, or helping people exercise informed consent about what timeframe they do it on?
But I have to say, having children of childbearing age and knowing several people struggling with autistic children, I have a concern that the way we are manufacturing our vaccines needs to be changed.
One of the really interesting things about the vaccine autism conspiracy theories is that if you look at it, you see the goalposts have consistently been moved down the field.
You are already assuming that yeah, of course these guys, you know, they already sequenced the human genome Of course, they know how to augment the immune system.
Sometimes things work and sometimes things don't But if you can blame it on one poison or one adjuvant then you immediately have this thing where yeah But everything else was fine
The fundamental principle of intramuscular injection of any combination of substances with the intent of augmenting the immune system has always been dumb, and that's why when that lady finished her question and they said, who's gonna answer it, they all laughed, because they know that's the damn truth.
But now you have these new other concerns that it's too many too soon, that it's too... It couldn't possibly be that number one, it's intramuscular injection of any combination of substance with the intent of augmenting the immune system is dumb.
But then also the United States government and the FDA and Harvard and all these other shitheads have decided to push these things ever earlier into the childhood vaccine schedule, which is
kind of more or less mandated and very very much legally protected from any liability and that that might not have any biological basis in reality that might only have to do with these manufacturers wanting to be on that schedule and wanting to be early enough so that they're going regularly to the doctor and more likely that they will get high uptake of their product because you just heard them bitch that once you start giving it to teenagers it's kind of hard to get people to bite
And we wouldn't need to market to them anymore because they would be stuck in this time when, as he described it, they're too tired and they're too worn out and they're too scared to listen to any information from their doctor anyway.
And I think the only real answer is that every single piece of research, and I think autism, out of all the adverse reactions, has been studied more than almost any other because of the intense focus on it.
The green book that Children's Health Defense doesn't sell as much as they sell is the Wuhan book, or the books of Robert Malone, or the books of Andrew Huff, or the Fauci book.
In a way, we might have created this problem by stating that in our speed or in our desire for speed in getting parents to agree to the vaccines, I think many practitioners, myself included, will say these vaccines are safe.
But because that second sentence is not often spoken or maybe not even heard, you end up with parents who hear, on the one hand, that the medical community is completely denying any association between vaccines and autism.
And yet they hear of all sorts of instances where vaccines clearly could be and should be implicated, such as seizures or acute demyelinating diseases and various diseases that are very rare, but are probably causally related to vaccines.
That would be like sitting across from the parent of a beautiful teenage girl who goes out every night with her friends until one in the morning and comes back with different guys in different sports cars every night.
And so you sit there listening to this doctor say this stuff, and you realize as a parent that if you believe what you say you believe, then if there was a signal, you wouldn't see it.
that if your limited spectrum of understanding only involves seizures that are closely correlated in time with the injection, allergic reactions that are closely correlated in time with the injection, or very specific list of things that the manufacturer has provided, you are full of shit!
And so the language that we use to try to convince patients to accept the vaccines that are extremely safe, but not 100% safe, may have led to some of these problems.
So we struggle at the other end of things, which is to get a new vaccine through the incredibly thick levels of phase one trials for safety, phase two trials, larger numbers of people, for safety and showing correlates of protection, and then
If a kid doesn't get a sore arm from some of the vaccines, it means we're not stimulating the inflammatory response that helps get a good immune response.
And there is a system called VAERS, Vaccine Adverse Effects, where every batch of every commercial vaccine is categorized such that anyone who has an adverse effect, doctor or patient,
I mean, one example I sometimes use is every year there are people who are killed because they're wearing seat belts, because it ends up crushing their sternum.
Or another thing, I sometimes tell parents is you're more likely to get in a car accident on the way to your doctor's appointment than you are for your child to have an adverse effect.
When you mentioned the latest vaccine conspiracy theories, I was reminded of an article that was shared recently with me by a member of the non-medical community.
One of the latest conspiracy theories, which was that the CDC has covered up reports that there was a 300 times greater risk of autism developing in African-American boys.
And even though we might be able to critique the scientific validity of what or whatever of these results, how can we be sensitive to the concerns of communities that have historically been marginalized and have historically had a relationship of mistrust with the medical community?
This, when this didn't work, when this kind of shit doesn't work, you pull something like the Scooby-Doo, where you tell people that there's a pandemic, you murder people and lie about it in order to make sure that this childhood vaccine schedule never finds the scrutiny it needs in order to be exposed as the criminal enterprise that it is.
We need a new consensus about transfection in healthy humans being always criminally negligent, RNA not being able to pandemic, and the vaccine schedule in the USA was a criminal enterprise before the pandemic.
It's kind of the least I can do for the supporters that are supporting me and try to provide a little regular appearance that you can try to book or be aware of.
We're gonna fire up the fireplace, put a camera on it and just hang out and watch the chat, talk to one another, maybe enjoy a little sounds of kids on the trampoline and maybe a glass of wine.
