The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion but allow a very lively debate within that spectrum.
That gives people the sense that there is free thinking going on while all the time the presuppositions of the system are being reinforced by the limits put on the range of the debate.
And so Gigo and biological is arranged nightly against this narrative and trying to dissect it with common sense and biology that we can verify that has been verified.
It's a lot of fun to kind of have a reason to keep myself busy at night and put my energy into something that otherwise I would be pulling my hair out at least now.
And it is a video where basically he makes the statement that vaccination is a methodology that will eventually work on everything for diseases that our immune system doesn't respond adequately enough.
We've read this opening paragraph a couple times about the fact that the markets for vaccines is driven by perception, not by actual need and that the funding after September 11th went way up.
Because bioterrorism in several years of sustained increases in government funding have had a stimulatory effect on vaccine development as well as AIDS research has.
And of course we know that almost all of these people who are involved in this narrative right now cut their teeth at some point in their career through the laboratory of somebody who was involved in anything from the actual delineation and definition of the AIDS virus
So it's really very, very extraordinary how many of these red threads run through all of these characters, their mentors run back all through the human genome project all the way back to this special cancer virus program.
All the way back to the very place where retroviruses and other viruses were first defined and first thought to be the bringing humanity to the cusp of being able to manipulate our own genome.
We were people like Robert Malone have described it that way as the buzz in these labs and the excitement over the discovery of retroviruses and PCR and all this other stuff really made people start to think that wow, we're about to have a giant breakthrough.
Anyway, this is in 2004 that that guy that we just saw in that video was again talking and advocating for the idea that vaccines as a methodology can be applied to a lot of different quote unquote diseases.
And I find it very interesting that this entire paper is basically packed with truth. And so if you wouldn't mind, I'd just like to read a couple paragraphs here from section two, which is titled genome to proteome to immune
the suffix O M E sort of designating library or catalog or or golden grimoire. And so you have the genome, you have the proteomes of the proteins of that whole living thing.
And the idea, the concept is an almost an infinite one. So it, when they first started throwing out the word proteome, I used to get really frustrated with it.
But I kind of just rolled with it after five years. It's like, okay, everybody's going to keep saying it, whatever, but it's kind of dumb because the genome is essentially the genetic code of an organism.
So the proteome then would be all the possible proteins that can be produced from the genome. And so if you study the proteome, it's like trying to say that, well, I study the English language and so I study the language
and you study books. So you study the book home, and I'm going to study all the possible books that can be made from the English language. And it's like, okay, but that's
that's kind of a different thing than saying you're going to study the English language. You're going to study all the books that can be written by the English language is like what?
And so from a biological perspective, and I know that at least Mark and I, if we were sitting at a campfire and it was late night with, well, I don't know, I guess he doesn't drink, but I would have to have rum or something like that.
We would be talking late night into this idea of how these, the biological possibility space just expands infinitesimally when you go from here are all the genes and we think we can read all these proteins.
And so these proteins are these proteins is so ridiculously simplistic given the way that the way that mRNA is regulated, the way that mRNA is differentially translated by ribosomes in different places in the cell.
Never mind different tissues. Never mind different people with different genetic background. It's just, it's mind blowing how much variation is possible from genome to proteome.
And in this case, it's talking about what parts of proteins are attractive to the immune system such that the immune system will choose to make memory to those epitopes and not all the other epitopes that are found.
And someone else with a mixed race background of Native American and other things would still sometimes respond to the same epitopes on the same proteins of a pathogen.
And so there has to be some kind of commonality there. And I think one of the things that we're going to explore over the next couple months is something that was also sort of stumbled on by the help of Mark Gulak
And so that could be molecular motifs in a protein that are hydrophobic so that they cause, they can cause proteins to stick to membranes or disrupt membranes.
I'm just trying to imagine some other examples. It might be combinations of anions or cationic chains that cause the immune system to recognize something as being potentially damage causing.
And that's an interesting theory that quite a few immunologists have had over the years, but has remained very obscure in terms of the discussions in textbooks and all this other things.
And there are lots of patterns, apparent patterns in the way that people of different genetic backgrounds still zero in on the same epitopes that suggest there might be such a selectivity thing where you're looking for patterns that have already in evolution
Anyway, so if you read this thing, it says, selecting the correct antigen or antigens has always been a major stumbling block for black scene development.
Are now making it possible to derive proteins or antigens of interest directly from the genomes of pathogens and are contributing to the development of new concepts in vaccine designs such as genome or immune or derived vaccines.
So what they're suggesting is that they can use the data that they get from lots and lots of screening of activated T cells and small protein fragments to start to predict.
The beautiful thing about this paragraph is how much of their motivation gets revealed by this because they are very distinctly talking about vaccine design.
And again, you and I both know, because we've been working on it for years, that vaccine design then implies a correlate of immunity 99.9% of the time is going to be B cell output antibodies.
They actually seem like they're telling the truth here. Antibodies come first though, which is not right, T helper cells, which drive antibody response and cytotoxic T lymphocytes for intracellular pathogens.
T cell responses, both T helper and cytotoxic T lymphocytes, are stimulated by the presence of short peptides bound on the surface of antigen presenting cells.
It's kind of a lot of hand-waving to say, yeah, the antigenic cells are antigen-presenting cells take in parts of the pathogen and process the proteins that they find and then choose by some magic selection process a small epitope or epitopes to present on MHC to the T cells.
And the T cells that can recognize it will be activated, will divide and proliferate and then spread out and hopefully try to cooperate with B cells that are detecting floating antigens themselves.
It is the T cell epitope that drives protective immune response to vaccines because T cell help is required for the orchestration of immune memory, whether humoral or cellular.
The T cells are the most important thing and why are they most important because they are the ones that coordinate and allow the other cells to do their thing to proliferate, to produce plasma cells, memory cells for cytotoxic T cells to also proliferate.
And then the T helper cells chemically encourage the endothelial cells to release the connective proteins between them so there's a little bit of a gap for the cytotoxic T cells to amebically go in to the site of the infection, be it the lungs
This is a well understood process that's orchestrated by all sorts of concentration gradients that require there to be a site of infection at a barrier.
And so, as they describe it so succinctly in a few sentences, it's kind of remarkable that in the three years of the pandemic, the PBS NewsHour or Ben Shapiro or Sam Harris or, you know, Brett Weinstein Joe Rogan couldn't have read any one of these papers and found out, wow, that's crazy.
Derived from every protein antigen in the entire pathogen only selected peptides passed through the processing and binding steps and successfully stimulated T cell response.
How dangerous that is. I guess I can stay over there. How dangerous that is because they aren't interested in whether the immune response that they are stimulating is functionally relevant to.
Identifying small sequences that are reliable activators of the immune system and small sequences that are reliable trainers of the immune system relative to a particular pathogen.
And so if you look through using bio informatics or immuno informatics through a protein and you find that this eight or nine or 10 protein or 10 amino acid sequence seems to really piss off T cells.
And I, I want you to understand that from the perspective of damage versus immune activation, because it is possible that there are a few quirky protein sequences that for whatever reason shouldn't or don't very often exist.
It goes from a fine line between being a useful adjuvant, which is what they're really looking for here they're not looking for for an epitope, which is good at making for a vaccine for one thing they're looking for epitopes which activate T cells.
And they're saying it right out loud here, you know, immuno immunom derived vaccines that that's just saying that we can activate the immune system, make it do things.
This is what they think they can do. This is what a lot of them have told each other they're doing. That's why Peter Cullis said that when the results came back.
And so we've been pushing hard on this idea that the intellectual dark web is really asserted at the beginning of the pandemic and played a role throughout to kind of slow roll this scooby do this argument or this exposure of gain of function research and the likely that this was a lab leak.
That's what we're supposed to believe, even though Jordan Peterson and Brett Weinstein and all these people were totally on narrative until at least at least June of 2021 one and a half years on narrative.
And so, you know, as you dig into these networks, you find out that a lot of the people that you like or listen to are all just, you know, it's not a bunch of cool people hanging out together. This is an organized performance.
So they also tried to talk about the idea that it's hilarious to think that they're part of the plan and they feel really silly and that people think that it's, you know, some big conspiracy theory between Peter Teal and.
And then he even made made very light of the idea that somehow he was implicated in the plot to kill Jeff K or something like that and has absolutely nothing to do with that, of course, it has to do with.
The intellectual property of of antibodies, intellectual property space that the FDA governs the kinds of powers that the FDA has and understanding how they they govern.
The same people that were agreeing with, you know, you shouldn't be allowed back to college and you people are endangering everybody and all this other garbage.
One of my college's friends trying to do a calculation about how much RNA has been made since the start of the pandemic when we had no SARS-CoV-2 tell when we spilled it in the in the wet market and then it went went replicating all around the world there must be like we must have gone from.
So this is important to understand how this was already predicted right we were talking about this year and a half ago or two years ago that they're going to start to push for push for everybody not to be able to be anonymous on the Internet anymore.
They might even hurt some kids or put somebody in front of Congress that says that their kids were hurt or kidnapped by somebody who was interacting with them anonymously on the Internet and she's begging Congress to help her by requiring people who use certain websites like to have digital ID or somebody's going to lose their bank account and it's because they lost their ID so they want digital ID for that.
There's going to be something and then the EU is going to put it in place for travel and for flying and then after that you're going to pretty much have to do it anyway and then oh surprise there's already an RFID chip in your passport.
If you have a driver's license in Florida or a real ID driver's license anywhere else in the United States you already have the hardware in your pocket for a digital ID.
So I just wanted to play this one because this is an example of how the how the skilled TV watchers on the market zoonosis side the Batcave virus side have been led to believe that the lab leak story is something of a misinformation
campaign and it's not possible that the zoonosis market theory is a elaborate campaign of messaging it's not it's only possible that obviously the lab leak is a
And so this is part of the way that they baited people into trying to figure out what was really going on and then you know you'd follow Lehman Yann for a while and then this video came out and people were like oh man you were following Lehman Yann she's totally fake dude check it out.
What you see here is Dr. Lehman Yann the bio weapon whistleblower and as you can see when you scroll down here but just looking her name there are hundreds of bots that are identical user profile user message.
Retreat her posts all just to increase the disinformation that the main account is spreading so you are very odd very inauthentic this is not real but it was very effective in spreading the myth in 2020.
And what's really crazy is that most likely a lot of these things were were what is the right they were simulated or they were gained so that the story is.
And so in order for us to really succeed here what we need to do is figure out what those next steps are and try to avoid them try to try to hamper their progress toward those goals and so.
We have to address the institutions of science to make some selection to set up panels of experts who are really experts and who wouldn't push into the media but who are somehow qualified to summarize the state of knowledge.
And you usually give quite a few of them to the library because if someone requests them at least for the first few years they like to be able to send them out because you made them right you spent your own money.
He's talking about making sure that we shut other people up and that the university select who we listen to during the first stages of such an emergency like this.
Of communication, of social media you know no offense to them but if they want our help sorting out the false narratives on Fox and MSNBC well no thanks.
I noticed that actually Matthew Crawford was on the defender in depth podcast this morning and he did a presentation about all cause mortality and some other stuff.
Wittingly or unwittingly most of the people that purport to be dissidents to purport to be the people that have saved us from enslavement that saved us from mandates that saved us from you know real long term harm.
Dixon in the upper right corner is is really pushing back on the idea that a lot of these ecological principles and paradigms and concepts are applicable to RNA or DNA virus.
Just almost laugh at Dixon's objections like come on man what are you saying that not every biological concept applies to viruses G whiz man I mean sorry very sensitive huh.
And it should not be taken lightly how important it is that at some point Vincent Rancin yellow said well let's just let's just redefine the word ecosystem.
Let's redefine these words so that words that apply in other biological context can also be applied to viruses even if we're not applying in the same way.
And so yes these you know you've seen these slides you know what I'm saying the illusion of consensus is this worst case scenario that was so important for the intellectual dark web and these people to lay down this worst case scenario that holy crap.
And it wasn't one person implying it just by calling it a bio weapon you're implying that just by calling it an ethnic bio weapon you're implying that just by calling it.
And so this consensus right is the is the who declared a pandemic and everybody said yep there's a consensus that that's correct whatever the who says we do.
Holy cow everybody agrees that the same virus was found in like four different places man oh man everybody agrees that everybody's dying from the same thing must be a pandemic.
Can you imagine a scenario where they wouldn't have waited for mother nature to give us a bat cave zoneosis and they would have created it on their own.
They want you to believe that we are in a new age where the threat to public health represented by gain of function viruses and by zoonotic viruses because of population and climate change.
Requires us to fundamentally reorganize how our children think about themselves about their sovereignty about their responsibility of their own bodies and the bodies of their children.
And also what obligations they have to society because of this perceived threat that originates in bat caves mostly.
01:00:03.500 --> 01:00:16.500
And that's what this illusion of consensus about a novel virus is all about all the college kids are sure that millions of people were died from the virus and all the college kids are sure that it was probably a lab leak.
01:00:17.500 --> 01:00:36.500
And that means we've misled the arm and the way that they did it was not doing the math so these are all being need to be subtracted from the excess deaths before you can understand what's left for the mystery virus.
01:00:37.500 --> 01:00:42.500
And unfortunately if you do that math correctly there's really nothing left for the mystery virus to have done.
01:00:43.500 --> 01:00:46.500
Because the protocols were murdered.
01:00:47.500 --> 01:00:54.500
The virus didn't really kill anybody because PCR fraud lateral test flow lateral flow test fraud.
01:00:54.500 --> 01:01:09.500
The variants and sequences and all the stories they've told about those they're complete abject ignoring the ubiquitous nature of infectious clones in the coronavirus and RNA virus literature in general.
01:01:10.500 --> 01:01:19.500
And then we never talk about any of these other things to do with our potential mechanistic immunity to these RNA signals.
01:01:20.500 --> 01:01:23.500
Nothing to do with how they might overlap with others of them.
01:01:24.500 --> 01:01:36.500
And so you can have this illusion of consensus if as long as nobody questions the novel virus, nobody questions that millions of people died, nobody questions gain a function being real and that the virus will come again.
01:01:36.500 --> 01:01:39.500
You can even mention protocols were murdering the background.
01:01:40.500 --> 01:01:41.500
It's okay.
01:01:42.500 --> 01:01:44.500
Sometimes they say it every once in a while.
01:01:46.500 --> 01:01:47.500
Not very often.
01:01:48.500 --> 01:01:51.500
And certainly not to the state where they've done the math.
01:01:53.500 --> 01:01:56.500
They preserve the faith to the novel virus.
01:01:56.500 --> 01:01:58.500
That's mainly what they do.
01:01:59.500 --> 01:02:07.500
And that's mainly what I think we're going to find a complete story of right where they want us to be.
01:02:08.500 --> 01:02:20.500
And now you got to imagine that this guy is the guy who got in front of the Senate or in front of the house or wherever he is and was yelling at Tony Fauci and Tony Fauci turned red and fired back.
01:02:20.500 --> 01:02:32.500
And depending on whether you had a Fox editor edit it or a CNN editor edit it, it could be twisted into wow Tony Fauci really took him to school.
01:02:33.500 --> 01:02:37.500
Or man, Rand Paul really freaking dunked on Fauci.
01:02:38.500 --> 01:02:46.500
And it was extraordinary because both clips were being shared as the one side shredding the other side.
01:02:47.500 --> 01:02:59.500
Both sides had memes with the little graphic sunglasses and cigar out of his mouth like cat.
01:03:00.500 --> 01:03:11.500
I mean, it's actually kind of a joke that over these past three years it's still those two characters pretending to argue with each other.
01:03:12.500 --> 01:03:16.500
It's so definitely a Scooby-Doo performance. It's hard.
01:03:17.500 --> 01:03:20.500
I almost want to celebrate it.
01:03:21.500 --> 01:03:22.500
So let's watch it.
01:03:24.500 --> 01:03:25.500
Hey, where'd it go?
01:03:26.500 --> 01:03:27.500
What the heck?
01:03:28.500 --> 01:03:29.500
Oh, there it is.
01:03:30.500 --> 01:03:34.500
I got to move my head for a second and put this back here.
01:03:34.500 --> 01:03:35.500
Ah.
01:03:40.500 --> 01:03:41.500
Put this back here.
01:03:43.500 --> 01:03:44.500
Here we go.
01:03:44.500 --> 01:03:46.500
Make sure you wear a mask.
01:03:46.500 --> 01:03:49.500
Remember how some government officials handled the pandemic?
01:03:49.500 --> 01:03:58.500
One of the ways you could do it if you would like to is put a cloth mask over the so-called experts and the media made lots of mistakes.
01:03:58.500 --> 01:04:02.500
Hollywood Beach shutting down the city is closing the beach and the broadway.
01:04:02.500 --> 01:04:06.500
An expert told us no way COVID leaked from a laugh.
01:04:06.500 --> 01:04:09.500
We've all heard the conspiracy theories at the lab leak.
01:04:09.500 --> 01:04:14.500
One rare politician who pushed back against the experts was Senator Rand Paul.
01:04:14.500 --> 01:04:18.500
He claimed our government-funded research might have created COVID.
01:04:18.500 --> 01:04:22.500
NIH money went to the Wuhan Virology Institute.
01:04:22.500 --> 01:04:25.500
Now it turns out Rand Paul was right.
01:04:25.500 --> 01:04:33.500
His new book, Deception, The Great COVID Coverup reveals details about the origins of COVID and the government's deceit.
01:04:33.500 --> 01:04:36.500
Here's my full interview with Senator Paul.
01:04:36.500 --> 01:04:43.500
One of the things you point out is that government often made mistakes that made the COVID experience worse.
01:04:43.500 --> 01:04:50.500
Yeah, I think there's been one set of truths in private and another set of truths for the whole people who aren't smart enough to make their decision.
01:04:51.500 --> 01:04:56.500
Oh, come on, don't fool with me here.
01:04:56.500 --> 01:04:59.500
What the hell?
01:05:06.500 --> 01:05:09.500
I tried to find an old video of Amy Goodman and Meryl Nast.
01:05:09.500 --> 01:05:11.500
I couldn't find it.
01:05:11.500 --> 01:05:13.500
I'll go back again.
01:05:13.500 --> 01:05:15.500
N95 masks may work.
01:05:16.500 --> 01:05:19.500
Even the Cochrane analysis looks at the N95 and found they didn't work very well.
01:05:19.500 --> 01:05:21.500
And there's a couple reasons for this.
01:05:21.500 --> 01:05:23.500
And I would say this with a caveat.
01:05:23.500 --> 01:05:27.500
If you're 75 years old and your spouse is sick with COVID the first time around when it was very deadly,
01:05:27.500 --> 01:05:33.500
I would have suggested, yes, where gloves in a mask when you go in to take them food, come out, throw them away,
01:05:33.500 --> 01:05:35.500
and have a brand new pair every time you go in.
01:05:35.500 --> 01:05:36.500
That's what the doctors are going to do.
01:05:36.500 --> 01:05:39.500
It's not full food, but it might work to some extent.
01:05:39.500 --> 01:05:42.500
They do know that the N95 mask, which do have small pores,
01:05:42.500 --> 01:05:44.500
after you wear them for three or four hours.
01:05:44.500 --> 01:05:50.500
So we're just into this interview and you can already see that we're not at all going to question that there was a novel virus.
01:05:50.500 --> 01:05:55.500
We're not going to question that it might help a little bit.
01:05:55.500 --> 01:05:58.500
Maybe wearing gloves would be a good idea.
01:05:58.500 --> 01:06:00.500
Throw them away right away afterward.
01:06:00.500 --> 01:06:01.500
I mean, come on.
01:06:01.500 --> 01:06:03.500
Are you kidding?
01:06:03.500 --> 01:06:09.500
We aren't even in ten seconds and we're already reciting the faith.
01:06:09.500 --> 01:06:11.500
We're going to go right down the list now.
01:06:11.500 --> 01:06:14.500
We're going to make sure we say that a lot of people died.
01:06:14.500 --> 01:06:16.500
We're going to make sure we saved a lot of people.
01:06:16.500 --> 01:06:23.500
We're going to make sure that gain of function is real and we're going to make sure that the advice is not going to come again unless we are dumb.
01:06:23.500 --> 01:06:28.500
We're going to go right down the faith list in the next 34 minutes.
01:06:28.500 --> 01:06:30.500
I might have to speed this up.
01:06:30.500 --> 01:06:32.500
Holy buckets.
01:06:32.500 --> 01:06:34.500
That's impressive.
01:06:34.500 --> 01:06:35.500
Can you tell?
01:06:35.500 --> 01:06:37.500
I haven't watched this really yet.
01:06:37.500 --> 01:06:42.500
The mixture of what you exhale, your exhaled air gets rid of the electrostatic charge and they don't filter as well.
01:06:42.500 --> 01:06:43.500
They really need this electrostatic charge.
01:06:43.500 --> 01:06:45.500
There's a lot of reasons they don't work as well.
01:06:45.500 --> 01:06:47.500
But they also know that they're so tight that everybody's fidgeting with them.
01:06:47.500 --> 01:06:50.500
So you and I shake hands and I was like, my damn mask is pressing on my face and I do this.
01:06:50.500 --> 01:06:52.500
So really, I'm just probably bringing things actually to my face.
01:06:52.500 --> 01:06:55.500
But there's nothing wrong with people trying, but I think what we did was the opposite.
01:06:55.500 --> 01:06:58.500
So Anthony Fauci wears a Washington National cloth, a piece of cut up shirt on his face.
01:06:58.500 --> 01:07:00.500
That's teaching you the wrong thing.
01:07:00.500 --> 01:07:06.500
So if you are at risk, an elderly person or an overweight person and you're taking care of a family member, if you wear a cloth mask in there, you're actually being told the wrong thing to do.
01:07:06.500 --> 01:07:08.500
You're being told that I'll be safe and you're encouraging bad behavior.
01:07:08.500 --> 01:07:09.500
So it's the opposite of public health.
01:07:09.500 --> 01:07:12.500
Anthony Fauci was actually telling people to do things that would put their life at risk.
01:07:12.500 --> 01:07:13.500
And there's a picture of him wearing a cloth mask?
01:07:13.500 --> 01:07:14.500
Two, three cloth masks.
01:07:14.500 --> 01:07:15.500
He showed up in one committee hearing.
01:07:15.500 --> 01:07:16.500
It's not a vaccine and you're wearing two masks.
01:07:16.500 --> 01:07:17.500
Isn't that theater?
01:07:17.500 --> 01:07:18.500
No, he would go again with the theater.
01:07:18.500 --> 01:07:19.500
He got all bent out of shape.
01:07:19.500 --> 01:07:21.500
But presumably three protects more than one.
01:07:21.500 --> 01:07:22.500
Maybe, but maybe not at all.
01:07:22.500 --> 01:07:25.500
You know, the other thing is is most of the masks don't work if there's air going outside of the mask.
01:07:25.500 --> 01:07:27.500
So you have to have a perfect seal on your face.
01:07:27.500 --> 01:07:28.500
And a beer isn't so.
01:07:28.500 --> 01:07:30.500
And then the question is, and this is the whole problem of public advice.
01:07:30.500 --> 01:07:34.500
This disease, not for the first time, but probably more so than almost any disease in recent history,
01:07:34.500 --> 01:07:35.500
had a real difference between ages.
01:07:35.500 --> 01:07:37.500
What you should tell children is wear nothing, go to school.
01:07:37.500 --> 01:07:38.500
It's less than getting the chicken box.
01:07:38.500 --> 01:07:39.500
It really was.
01:07:39.500 --> 01:07:40.500
For the elderly, you should say take precautions.
01:07:40.500 --> 01:07:41.500
Maybe avoid crowds.
01:07:41.500 --> 01:07:42.500
Maybe do this.
01:07:42.500 --> 01:07:43.500
And the advice was different, but they just made everything the same.
01:07:43.500 --> 01:07:44.500
It's the same with the vaccine.
01:07:44.500 --> 01:07:45.500
Everybody take the same per car.
01:07:45.500 --> 01:07:46.500
But that's government medicine.
01:07:46.500 --> 01:07:47.500
That's a centralization of control.
01:07:47.500 --> 01:07:52.500
And this is why I say that Dr. Fauci would be less of a menace if he were a fan.
01:07:52.500 --> 01:07:59.500
I will note that actually this position sounds most parallel to the position.
01:07:59.500 --> 01:08:05.500
Of the Great Barrington Declaration.
01:08:05.500 --> 01:08:17.500
Now, the reason why I think it's interesting that it's similar to the Great Barrington Declaration is because I do think we're going to have the opportunity to talk one on one with Jay Bhattacharya on Monday.
01:08:17.500 --> 01:08:23.500
And so I won't make any promises yet, but I do think that it has been scheduled now, finally.
01:08:24.500 --> 01:08:35.500
And so I'm trying to get together a succinct set of questions that I want to ask Jay and discuss with him in the hour that we can talk.
01:08:35.500 --> 01:08:43.500
But I think what we're basically describing here is the idea that not chocolate on my face, I think.
01:08:43.500 --> 01:08:45.500
I'm going to confess to you.
01:08:45.500 --> 01:08:51.500
I have a little shoebox full of, well, it's not full, but it's got Halloween candy in it.
01:08:51.500 --> 01:08:56.500
And I've been kind of keeping it back there by my drum set, and I forgot about it, and I remembered it the other day.
01:08:56.500 --> 01:09:10.500
And so since my appetite is back after I can breathe again, I've been sneaking some very bad things, but actually I'm so low on weight that right now, I'm just not going to really worry about it too much.
01:09:10.500 --> 01:09:11.500
I'm not going crazy.
01:09:11.500 --> 01:09:13.500
It's just keeping me awake.
01:09:14.500 --> 01:09:19.500
So the point is here, as I just confess to you, that I'm not some angel either.
01:09:19.500 --> 01:09:33.500
At least when it regards to what I eat all the time, I eat so well throughout the day because of my best friend and wife that having a couple small pieces of butter fingers is probably not going to kill me at this time.
01:09:34.500 --> 01:09:49.500
So what I'm trying to say here, long story short, is that I think this sounds very much like, well, we can mask around old people and we can isolate the old people and maybe, you know, we have to make some changes in public, you know, if we have to mask in certain public places, that's okay, masking
01:09:49.500 --> 01:09:52.500
and maybe we'll mask in hospitals.
01:09:52.500 --> 01:09:59.500
Maybe we need to mask in schools, but we're only going to do certain things depending on what's really necessary.
01:09:59.500 --> 01:10:02.500
We can't just mandate it everywhere.
01:10:02.500 --> 01:10:15.500
And so we're starting to kind of talk in this way where it says, you know, if the vaccines were, were subject to randomized control trials with placebo's, I would be fine with mandating them.
01:10:15.500 --> 01:10:21.500
So we're almost starting to say these things that aren't really saying what they, they purport to be saying.
01:10:21.500 --> 01:10:24.500
Kind of really not talking as tough as we're supposed to be.
01:10:24.500 --> 01:10:26.500
We think that they're talking.
01:10:26.500 --> 01:10:35.500
And I think already here, if you listen very carefully, he's not actually saying that, well, masks don't work, but, you know, if we have to require them someplace is okay.
01:10:35.500 --> 01:10:41.500
And yeah, they leak everywhere, but, but, but, well, not but, but, but.
01:10:41.500 --> 01:10:49.500
And so it's not as, yeah, it's just not as impressive as you would want it to be if you really knew that these people were fighting for us.
01:10:50.500 --> 01:10:52.500
Family doctor in Peoria, because you could take or leave his advice.
01:10:52.500 --> 01:10:55.500
But because it became so centralized, and he'll argue, I didn't, I didn't force any mandates.
01:10:55.500 --> 01:11:03.500
Well, once it becomes the dogma of the CDC and of NIH, what happens is if I own a private hotel, best practices, according to Dr. Fauci, everybody should wear a mask and we should only have 25% occupancy.
01:11:03.500 --> 01:11:08.500
So some of the mandates rolled off of best practices, but it all flowed downhill from Fauci and his, I think, mistaken advice.
01:11:08.500 --> 01:11:10.500
And for saying this, YouTube banned you.
01:11:10.500 --> 01:11:14.500
I have been censored up and kicked out of, you know, a lot of good places, but I take that as a badge of honor.
01:11:15.500 --> 01:11:22.500
And I think the real problem is not so much that YouTube censored me or Twitter or Facebook, Facebook censored people for a year and a half on the COVID origins, but it's that the government's coordinating with them.
01:11:22.500 --> 01:11:30.500
And that's my real objection to it is that weekly FBI and the Department of Homeland Security are actually meeting with journalists, Twitter, et cetera, and saying, you know, this is stuff we want you to take down.
01:11:30.500 --> 01:11:32.500
You've decided not to go back to YouTube.
01:11:32.500 --> 01:11:35.500
I'm on Rumble, and I think that's part of the libertarian or free market answer this.
01:11:35.500 --> 01:11:36.500
You don't like somebody, you don't use them.
01:11:36.500 --> 01:11:37.500
If you don't like their policy, you don't use them.
01:11:37.500 --> 01:11:38.500
Go somewhere else.
01:11:38.500 --> 01:11:39.500
Then you reach fewer people.
01:11:39.500 --> 01:11:40.500
Maybe, maybe not.
01:11:40.500 --> 01:11:41.500
YouTube probably is still a lot bigger than Rumble.
01:11:41.500 --> 01:11:44.500
I don't make any money off of doing it, so I just am having to go where I can get my views out.
01:11:44.500 --> 01:11:48.500
And I want to try to put my product or my content where people are actually open to freedom of speech.
01:11:48.500 --> 01:11:51.500
But I am of the belief that we should stop government from coordinating with these people.
01:11:51.500 --> 01:11:55.500
I don't think the First Amendment allows government to stop Twitter from banning me or YouTube from banning me.
01:11:55.500 --> 01:11:58.500
I think the First Amendment does allow for me to regulate the FBI and say the FBI cannot have routine meetings.
01:11:58.500 --> 01:12:00.500
And it's amazing how people don't get this.
01:12:00.500 --> 01:12:07.500
Like, I'll have an interview with a broadcast journalist, and I'll say to them, what would you think if after our interview you had a meeting, the FBI college and said we'd like to meet, and then we're going to look at your footage.
01:12:07.500 --> 01:12:10.500
We want to see what would be misinformation that you brought out of Randfall, and it shouldn't be aired.
01:12:10.500 --> 01:12:13.500
Well, people would be horrified by that, yet there's little outrage about this.
01:12:13.500 --> 01:12:15.500
What amazes me is how the outrage is only on one side anymore.
01:12:15.500 --> 01:12:20.500
I've been trying to get a Democrat on my bill to say that the government shouldn't be involved with censorship, and I cannot find one Democrat.
01:12:20.500 --> 01:12:23.500
And I lecture them, you know, relentlessly saying you guys used to be the good guys.
01:12:23.500 --> 01:12:25.500
In the 1960s, it was the left that criticized Hoover.
01:12:25.500 --> 01:12:29.500
It was the left that said Civil War protesters, you shouldn't be censoring their speech and investigating them.
01:12:29.500 --> 01:12:33.500
It was the left that says you shouldn't be looking at Martin Luther King's private phone calls, and you shouldn't be threatening Mark Luke King.
01:12:33.500 --> 01:12:35.500
The left was the defender of the First Amendment, the right wasn't so good.
01:12:35.500 --> 01:12:38.500
Now it's sort of completely flipped, and I'm hard pressed to find anybody on the left or some.
01:12:38.500 --> 01:12:41.500
But those people are now renegade to the left, Glenn Greenwald, Matt Teiby.
01:12:41.500 --> 01:12:46.500
These were people who probably would tell you they came from the left, but are still defenders of the First Amendment, but they're so very few.
01:12:46.500 --> 01:12:47.500
The silence is deafening.
01:12:47.500 --> 01:12:49.500
Staying on the topic of mistakes, the beginning of the pandemic.
01:12:49.500 --> 01:12:51.500
Government officials closed beaches.
01:12:51.500 --> 01:12:53.500
The closed sign staggered on the sidewalk paints a clear picture.
01:12:53.500 --> 01:12:54.500
The beaches will remain closed.
01:12:54.500 --> 01:12:57.500
One of my favorite images is in California, the Coast Guard.
01:12:57.500 --> 01:13:01.500
Coast Guard Cutter facing a guy down paddleboarding by himself in the Pacific Ocean, as if he's somehow a threat.
01:13:01.500 --> 01:13:04.500
And the ridiculousness of that makes people distrust government.
01:13:04.500 --> 01:13:09.500
My other favorite image is a guy was jogging on the beach in California, and you can tell he's very light-footed, and he's just cruising along the beach.
01:13:09.500 --> 01:13:12.500
And a policeman's coming up to try to stop him from being on the beach by himself.
01:13:12.500 --> 01:13:13.500
And the policeman's being heavy boots on.
01:13:13.500 --> 01:13:14.500
He's trying to get closer.
01:13:14.500 --> 01:13:17.500
And the guy sees him at the corner of his eye, and just sort of picks up his face.
01:13:17.500 --> 01:13:20.500
And you can just see this guy running, and he never gets caught into like, hooray for freedom.
01:13:20.500 --> 01:13:22.500
A guy's on the beach running, leaving the hell alone.
01:13:22.500 --> 01:13:23.500
Vaccine mandates.
01:13:23.500 --> 01:13:24.500
They were trying to protect people.
01:13:24.500 --> 01:13:26.500
Good intentions don't excuse bad behavior.
01:13:26.500 --> 01:13:29.500
It goes back to the supposition, are people too stupid to make their own mind up?
01:13:29.500 --> 01:13:31.500
I'd like to go back to the sort of beginning with vaccines to Smallpox.
01:13:31.500 --> 01:13:33.500
When Smallpox came out, the vaccine was like 1720s.
01:13:33.500 --> 01:13:34.500
It was very, very controversial.
01:13:34.500 --> 01:13:35.500
It was a live vaccine.
01:13:35.500 --> 01:13:39.500
They took some pus from somebody who had Smallpox, unroofed it, and stuck it in somebody's arm who didn't have Smallpox.
01:13:39.500 --> 01:13:40.500
They gave you Smallpox.
01:13:40.500 --> 01:13:42.500
And yet the public, by and large, pretty much accepted it.
01:13:42.500 --> 01:13:43.500
It had a death rate of 1 in 50.
01:13:43.500 --> 01:13:44.500
But the death rate from Smallpox was 30%.
01:13:44.500 --> 01:13:45.500
People aren't stupid.
01:13:45.500 --> 01:13:47.500
When Smallpox came to town, people lined up and took this vaccine.
01:13:47.500 --> 01:13:49.500
The doctors who started doing it vaccinated their kids first.
01:13:49.500 --> 01:13:50.500
They didn't mandate it.
01:13:50.500 --> 01:13:51.500
They showed, look, I'm proud of this.
01:13:51.500 --> 01:13:52.500
I'm vaccinating my kids.
01:13:52.500 --> 01:13:53.500
And it took off.
01:13:53.500 --> 01:13:55.500
George Washington, a bit.
01:13:55.500 --> 01:13:58.500
It should be called very, very elating, right?
01:13:58.500 --> 01:14:01.500
If they scratch it into the skin.
01:14:01.500 --> 01:14:06.500
Which is, of course, inoculation at a barrier.
01:14:06.500 --> 01:14:12.500
Which is definitely not intramuscular injection of a combination of substances with the intent of augmenting the immune system.
01:14:12.500 --> 01:14:13.500
It's an injection at a barrier.
01:14:13.500 --> 01:14:21.500
It's an exposure to a barrier exactly how I would advocate to at least attempt to augment the immune system.
01:14:21.500 --> 01:14:25.500
Actually, tell Martha she can't come to the camps until she's had a Smallpox vaccine and she does.
01:14:26.500 --> 01:14:27.500
But here's the interesting point about it.
01:14:27.500 --> 01:14:28.500
When we put this in the book as well.
01:14:28.500 --> 01:14:29.500
George Washington didn't take the vaccination.
01:14:29.500 --> 01:14:30.500
He was like, why?
01:14:30.500 --> 01:14:31.500
Was he a vaccine anti-vaxxer?
01:14:31.500 --> 01:14:32.500
Why didn't he take the vaccine?
01:14:32.500 --> 01:14:34.500
Because he had Smallpox scars on his face.
01:14:34.500 --> 01:14:35.500
He had Smallpox.
01:14:35.500 --> 01:14:38.500
So we used to believe and know that when you had something, it provided immunity.
01:14:38.500 --> 01:14:39.500
Not always perfect immunity.
01:14:39.500 --> 01:14:40.500
Smallpox is pretty much complete immunity.
01:14:40.500 --> 01:14:43.500
But most time people knew if you had something, if you got it again, you'd have less of a reaction the second time around.
01:14:43.500 --> 01:14:44.500
Because you probably already knew it.
01:14:44.500 --> 01:14:45.500
The vaccine didn't provide perfect immunity.
01:14:45.500 --> 01:14:46.500
Probably actually less so.
01:14:46.500 --> 01:14:48.500
We now, through a million person study, know that getting it naturally was twice as good.
01:14:48.500 --> 01:14:51.500
But if you tell this to a left wing reporter, they'll say, oh, you just want people to get sick and dying.
01:14:51.500 --> 01:14:52.500
If they don't die, they have immunity.
01:14:52.500 --> 01:14:54.500
It's like, well, no, I'm just acknowledging that a lot of people got sick.
01:14:54.500 --> 01:14:55.500
Some did die.
01:14:55.500 --> 01:14:56.500
I was tragic.
01:14:56.500 --> 01:14:57.500
But the ones who got sick give them the information so they know what to do.
01:14:57.500 --> 01:14:59.500
Do they need 10 more vaccines or is it protected?
01:14:59.500 --> 01:15:00.500
See, the CDC knows this.
01:15:00.500 --> 01:15:02.500
The CDC will not reveal this information.
01:15:02.500 --> 01:15:04.500
So instead of your government helping you make decisions, the CDC will not tell us.
01:15:04.500 --> 01:15:06.500
If you're 60, let's say you're 75 years old and you've got two vaccines.
01:15:06.500 --> 01:15:07.500
You took the advice in the beginning.
01:15:07.500 --> 01:15:08.500
And then you've had COVID once.
01:15:08.500 --> 01:15:09.500
What are your chances of dying again?
01:15:09.500 --> 01:15:11.500
I think they may be zero or very close to zero.
01:15:11.500 --> 01:15:15.500
It may not need your third, fourth, and fifth one, but you should be given the information the government has.
01:15:15.500 --> 01:15:23.500
So we're not talking about whether or not any of those old people are dying at a higher rate after their vaccine.
01:15:23.500 --> 01:15:27.500
We're talking about what do they need another one?
01:15:27.500 --> 01:15:31.500
What an interestingly irrelevant debate.
01:15:31.500 --> 01:15:36.500
What an interestingly irrelevant discussion to sound intelligent about.
01:15:37.500 --> 01:15:41.500
Well, I mean, how do we know if these old people only needed two shots?
01:15:41.500 --> 01:15:44.500
We don't need to be pushing four and five shots if they only needed two shots.
01:15:44.500 --> 01:15:45.500
How come we don't?
01:15:45.500 --> 01:15:47.500
The CDC doesn't tell us this.
01:15:47.500 --> 01:15:52.500
Is he not worried about whether or not the CDC is covering up people dying from the vaccine?
01:15:52.500 --> 01:15:55.500
Of course, he's not worried about it.
01:15:55.500 --> 01:15:58.500
Millions of people were saved by it.
01:15:58.500 --> 01:16:01.500
It's part of the faith.
01:16:01.500 --> 01:16:03.500
I hope you can see this.
01:16:03.500 --> 01:16:05.500
Got to see it for what it is.
01:16:05.500 --> 01:16:15.500
It's really bad because we are solidifying this in the minds of the young.
01:16:15.500 --> 01:16:18.500
They can't see through this lie.
01:16:18.500 --> 01:16:23.500
They can't imagine that people would lie about a virus.
01:16:23.500 --> 01:16:30.500
They can't imagine that he doesn't know what he's talking about, that he's just reading.
01:16:30.500 --> 01:16:35.500
Governing power, talking points.
01:16:35.500 --> 01:16:45.500
Wittingly or unwittingly, he is playing us right into their hands.
01:16:45.500 --> 01:16:46.500
Shoot.
01:16:46.500 --> 01:16:47.500
I thought I had that cut up.
01:16:47.500 --> 01:16:50.500
To whether or not you believe there's something nefarious and monetary incentive involved
01:16:50.500 --> 01:16:52.500
and whether or not they're doing this to make money for big pharma.
01:16:52.500 --> 01:16:53.500
I'm not so proud of this to believe that.
01:16:53.500 --> 01:16:56.500
I think these probably are good people that aren't doing it for it, but I've asked questions.
01:16:57.500 --> 01:16:59.500
Is anybody on the committees to approve the vaccine?
01:16:59.500 --> 01:17:01.500
Do any of them receive money from the vaccine manufacturers?
01:17:01.500 --> 01:17:02.500
They won't answer me.
01:17:02.500 --> 01:17:03.500
Dr. Fauci told me it was none of my business.
01:17:03.500 --> 01:17:05.500
He said that a law prevented him from revealing that to me.
01:17:05.500 --> 01:17:07.500
That's not an acceptable response.
01:17:07.500 --> 01:17:10.500
When they approved the third vaccine for children, the first committee was the FDA committee.
01:17:10.500 --> 01:17:12.500
It's full of all scientists that are pro-vaccine.
01:17:12.500 --> 01:17:13.500
In fact, they don't have a problem with mandates at all.
01:17:13.500 --> 01:17:15.500
They came out with the advice 65 and older.
01:17:15.500 --> 01:17:16.500
Nobody else for the booster.
01:17:16.500 --> 01:17:17.500
CDC had another vaccine committee.
01:17:17.500 --> 01:17:20.500
Scientists, all pro-vaccine, fine with mandates.
01:17:20.500 --> 01:17:21.500
They said the same thing, 65 and older.
01:17:21.500 --> 01:17:23.500
Rochelle Walensky, a political appointee of Biden,
01:17:23.500 --> 01:17:27.500
overrode both scientific committees and said the vaccine booster should be given to six months and up.
01:17:27.500 --> 01:17:28.500
Most of the countries of Europe don't do this.
01:17:28.500 --> 01:17:30.500
Almost every country of Europe, it's 12 and over and it's advice.
01:17:30.500 --> 01:17:31.500
Why? What's the motivation?
01:17:31.500 --> 01:17:32.500
That's the question.
01:17:32.500 --> 01:17:35.500
Get more people frightened and then they'll take the vaccine and that will save America.
01:17:35.500 --> 01:17:38.500
I think most of them are not very smart and they just blind like they take the damn vaccine, shut up and take it.
01:17:38.500 --> 01:17:39.500
It's good for you.
01:17:39.500 --> 01:17:40.500
I don't think about it.
01:17:40.500 --> 01:17:42.500
And maybe on the margins, it doesn't do much for kids, but probably not going to hurt you.
01:17:42.500 --> 01:17:45.500
The problem with the vaccine turns out that there is some risk of a hard inflammation for young people.
01:17:45.500 --> 01:17:46.500
We've advised people to take it.
01:17:46.500 --> 01:17:48.500
If you're older, take the vaccine, even take the boosters.
01:17:48.500 --> 01:17:49.500
Probably not going to hurt you.
01:17:49.500 --> 01:17:50.500
Have you?
01:17:51.500 --> 01:17:52.500
My wife got vaccinated.
01:17:52.500 --> 01:17:53.500
We're not against the advice.
01:17:53.500 --> 01:17:54.500
It's actually inoculated, meaning you had COVID.
01:17:54.500 --> 01:17:55.500
I had COVID.
01:17:55.500 --> 01:17:56.500
So I have immunity and some immunity.
01:17:56.500 --> 01:17:57.500
Yeah.
01:17:57.500 --> 01:17:58.500
Well, I'm got it again that I know of.
01:17:58.500 --> 01:17:59.500
I've had a cold once and that could have been COVID.
01:17:59.500 --> 01:18:00.500
I don't know.
01:18:00.500 --> 01:18:01.500
It should be a personal decision.
01:18:01.500 --> 01:18:03.500
Aren't there people that say you should say your body, your choice?
01:18:03.500 --> 01:18:04.500
My body, my choice.
01:18:04.500 --> 01:18:05.500
My body, my choice.
01:18:05.500 --> 01:18:07.500
My body, my choice.
01:18:07.500 --> 01:18:09.500
Except for vaccines, I guess, you know, in Sweden.
01:18:09.500 --> 01:18:10.500
And so.
01:18:12.500 --> 01:18:18.500
Please understand how the biology of a novel virus that we were all vulnerable to.
01:18:19.500 --> 01:18:22.500
Is not being challenged here.
01:18:22.500 --> 01:18:27.500
He's actually arguing for the idea that he doesn't need to get vaccinated because he
01:18:27.500 --> 01:18:31.500
got the novel virus and was infected by it and survived.
01:18:31.500 --> 01:18:38.500
Just like George Washington had smallpox scars on his face, he got infected.
01:18:38.500 --> 01:18:44.500
So God gave him his vaccine.
01:18:44.500 --> 01:18:48.500
Why doesn't he argue for his wife not needing a vaccine because she was in the
01:18:48.500 --> 01:18:49.500
same household as him.
01:18:49.500 --> 01:18:53.500
She would have developed immunity because you develop T cell immunity, even if you
01:18:53.500 --> 01:18:57.500
don't develop all the symptoms, we have many papers that show that, including
01:18:57.500 --> 01:19:07.500
nature papers that I think he's even been sent by me or a viewer of ours.
01:19:07.500 --> 01:19:12.500
So again, we are talking about selective.
01:19:12.500 --> 01:19:14.500
They, they aren't listening.
01:19:14.500 --> 01:19:19.500
We've sent them this, this biology over the course of the last three years and
01:19:19.500 --> 01:19:22.500
they are not listening.
01:19:22.500 --> 01:19:26.500
We have tried to put this biology into different books and those authors don't
01:19:26.500 --> 01:19:31.500
listen because the story of a novel virus needs to be told.
01:19:31.500 --> 01:19:35.500
The story of millions of people dying needs to be told.
01:19:35.500 --> 01:19:38.500
The story of millions of people being saved needs to be told.
01:19:38.500 --> 01:19:43.500
The story of gain of function and the possibility of killing half the planet
01:19:43.500 --> 01:19:44.500
needs to be told.
01:19:44.500 --> 01:19:49.500
And the possibility of the virus coming again needs to exist so that they can
01:19:49.500 --> 01:19:55.500
force the next things upon us.
01:19:55.500 --> 01:20:00.500
And it could even be that while we talk about, you know, these viruses don't exist
01:20:00.500 --> 01:20:05.500
or, or this danger doesn't exist, that we're still wasting our time because
01:20:05.500 --> 01:20:09.500
what we should really be saying is they're about to make us have digital ID on the
01:20:09.500 --> 01:20:11.500
internet.
01:20:11.500 --> 01:20:18.500
And once we have digital ID on the internet, we basically have digital ID for money.
01:20:18.500 --> 01:20:21.500
And once we have that, well, then we're done.
01:20:21.500 --> 01:20:24.500
Slowly but surely we're done anyway, I guess.
01:20:24.500 --> 01:20:28.500
I don't know how else to say it because not enough people are waking up now,
01:20:28.500 --> 01:20:31.500
not enough people want to wake up.
01:20:32.500 --> 01:20:39.500
But at least we can try and show them that this biological mythology is exactly that.
01:20:39.500 --> 01:20:44.500
And we knew that they were taking us here for the last two years.
01:20:44.500 --> 01:20:50.500
We knew that they were taking us right here for the left and the right to come to the
01:20:50.500 --> 01:20:53.500
conclusion that holy cow, it's a lab leak.
01:20:53.500 --> 01:20:54.500
That is crazy.
01:20:54.500 --> 01:20:57.500
No wonder it was such a nutty pandemic.
01:20:57.500 --> 01:20:58.500
Unbelievable.
01:20:58.500 --> 01:21:02.500
That means their Jenny died of a, of a bio weapon.
01:21:02.500 --> 01:21:06.500
Can you believe it?
01:21:06.500 --> 01:21:08.500
Where they did say natural and unity was helpful.
01:21:08.500 --> 01:21:09.500
They were tracked.
01:21:09.500 --> 01:21:11.500
And it turns out they did as well or better than most parts of Europe.
01:21:11.500 --> 01:21:13.500
And they also didn't mandate masks in schools.
01:21:13.500 --> 01:21:14.500
They also didn't close the schools.
01:21:14.500 --> 01:21:16.500
So everything we did in this country is wrong.
01:21:16.500 --> 01:21:18.500
And that's why the debates, this isn't just looking back in the rearview mirror just for
01:21:18.500 --> 01:21:19.500
the hell of it.
01:21:19.500 --> 01:21:22.500
This is to make sure we actually learn something and don't do this kind of lockdown mentality
01:21:22.500 --> 01:21:23.500
again.
01:21:23.500 --> 01:21:24.500
On balance, the vaccines were a good thing.
01:21:24.500 --> 01:21:25.500
If you were at risk.
01:21:25.500 --> 01:21:26.500
Yeah.
01:21:26.500 --> 01:21:27.500
So I would say that you base it on risk.
01:21:27.500 --> 01:21:29.500
If you say, are they a good thing for a 75 year old?
01:21:29.500 --> 01:21:30.500
I think we save lives.
01:21:30.500 --> 01:21:31.500
If you say, did they save any five year old's life?
01:21:31.500 --> 01:21:32.500
No.
01:21:32.500 --> 01:21:35.500
And we know now that it's about two to three kids out of 15,000 will get a heart inflammation,
01:21:35.500 --> 01:21:37.500
which may lead to permanent damage to their heart.
01:21:37.500 --> 01:21:38.500
So people just need to know that.
01:21:38.500 --> 01:21:40.500
If you're a parent want to take that risk for your 15 year old,
01:21:40.500 --> 01:21:41.500
it's perfectly healthy.
01:21:41.500 --> 01:21:42.500
Fine.
01:21:42.500 --> 01:21:43.500
But there are a lot of parents with a healthy 15 year old who are told that the mortality
01:21:43.500 --> 01:21:47.500
is zero that will take their chances with COVID rather than two or three chances out of 15,000
01:21:47.500 --> 01:21:48.500
of a heart inflammation.
01:21:48.500 --> 01:21:53.500
Since it works for older people, people my age, the Republican messaging may have killed people.
01:21:53.500 --> 01:21:55.500
There's data that shows that more Republicans died.
01:21:55.500 --> 01:21:56.500
I think it's actually the opposite.
01:21:56.500 --> 01:21:58.500
I think what happened is vaccine hesitancy comes from people's disability.
01:21:58.500 --> 01:21:59.500
Holy cow.
01:21:59.500 --> 01:22:03.500
So if the government comes, it works for people like me, where they did say.
01:22:03.500 --> 01:22:04.500
Wow.
01:22:04.500 --> 01:22:05.500
It was helpful.
01:22:05.500 --> 01:22:06.500
They were tracked.
01:22:06.500 --> 01:22:08.500
And it turns out they did as well or better than most parts of Europe.
01:22:08.500 --> 01:22:10.500
And they also didn't mandate masks in schools.
01:22:10.500 --> 01:22:11.500
They also didn't close the schools.
01:22:11.500 --> 01:22:12.500
So everything we did in this country is wrong.
01:22:12.500 --> 01:22:15.500
And that's why the debates, this isn't just looking back in the rearview mirror just for the hell of it.
01:22:15.500 --> 01:22:18.500
This is to make sure we actually learn something and don't do this kind of lockdown mentality again.
01:22:18.500 --> 01:22:20.500
On balance, the vaccines were a good thing.
01:22:20.500 --> 01:22:21.500
If you were at risk.
01:22:21.500 --> 01:22:22.500
Yeah.
01:22:22.500 --> 01:22:23.500
So I would say that you base it on risk.
01:22:23.500 --> 01:22:25.500
If you say, are they a good thing for a 75 year old?
01:22:25.500 --> 01:22:26.500
I think we save lives.
01:22:26.500 --> 01:22:27.500
If you say, did they save any five year old's life?
01:22:27.500 --> 01:22:28.500
No.
01:22:28.500 --> 01:22:31.500
And we know now that it's about two to three kids out of 15,000 will get a heart inflammation,
01:22:31.500 --> 01:22:33.500
which may lead to permanent damage to their heart.
01:22:33.500 --> 01:22:34.500
So people just need to know that.
01:22:34.500 --> 01:22:37.500
If you're a parent want to take that risk for your 15 year old who's perfectly healthy, fine,
01:22:37.500 --> 01:22:40.500
but there are a lot of parents with a healthy 15 year old who are told that the mortality is zero,
01:22:40.500 --> 01:22:44.500
that we'll take their chances with COVID rather than two or three chances out of 15,000 of a heart inflammation.
01:22:44.500 --> 01:22:51.500
Take your chances with COVID that somebody like Paul Offit will tell you is much, much better at causing heart inflammation
01:22:51.500 --> 01:22:54.500
and heart damage than the vaccine is.
01:22:55.500 --> 01:23:01.500
That your own doctor will tell you the habit the virus is much, much better at causing heart damage than the vaccine is.
01:23:01.500 --> 01:23:06.500
I've heard hundreds of them say it, tweet it, post it on Facebook.
01:23:06.500 --> 01:23:09.500
Are you kidding me?
01:23:09.500 --> 01:23:13.500
He's walking everyone right into the wood chipper of being called.
01:23:13.500 --> 01:23:16.500
Wow, you're really an idiot, aren't you?
01:23:16.500 --> 01:23:19.500
Don't you know that this novel virus is so much worse.
01:23:19.500 --> 01:23:22.500
The spike protein of this virus is so much.
01:23:22.500 --> 01:23:24.500
I mean, are you crazy?
01:23:24.500 --> 01:23:26.500
Who told you that?
01:23:26.500 --> 01:23:28.500
Rand Paul.
01:23:28.500 --> 01:23:33.500
And here is Rand Paul so calmly just rattling it off the same.
01:23:33.500 --> 01:23:42.500
The same stick that he was saying way back in 2020, basically with some more details, but it's basically the same garbage.
01:23:42.500 --> 01:23:44.500
It's a lab leak.
01:23:44.500 --> 01:23:49.500
And the vaccine saved old people and people like his age.
01:23:49.500 --> 01:23:52.500
We probably just shouldn't have given it to kids.
01:23:52.500 --> 01:23:54.500
I mean, that's all, you know, that's really it.
01:23:54.500 --> 01:23:57.500
We only kind of overstepped.
01:23:57.500 --> 01:23:59.500
I mean, it's still great for old people.
01:23:59.500 --> 01:24:02.500
Old people should still take it.
01:24:02.500 --> 01:24:05.500
Holy man.
01:24:05.500 --> 01:24:11.500
Imagine since it works for older people, people my age, the Republican messaging may have killed people.
01:24:11.500 --> 01:24:13.500
There's data that shows that more Republicans died.
01:24:13.500 --> 01:24:14.500
I think it's actually the opposite.
01:24:14.500 --> 01:24:17.500
I think what happened is vaccine hesitancy comes from people's disbelief in government.
01:24:17.500 --> 01:24:20.500
So if the government comes to you and says everybody needs to have a vaccine including your six-month-old,
01:24:20.500 --> 01:24:23.500
and you know either instinctively or through the evidence that they're lying to you about the six-month-old,
01:24:23.500 --> 01:24:25.500
that they really don't need it, then you start to distrust them.
01:24:25.500 --> 01:24:28.500
You sound 75, but if they're lying to me about the kids, maybe they're lying to me about this.
01:24:28.500 --> 01:24:32.500
So I would say that some vaccine hesitancy came from people's distrust, just overwhelming distrust of government period,
01:24:32.500 --> 01:24:33.500
but I think government made it worse.
01:24:33.500 --> 01:24:35.500
It made vaccine hesitancy worse by telling you things that weren't true.
01:24:35.500 --> 01:24:37.500
Everybody in the news, this was a disease of elderly.
01:24:37.500 --> 01:24:38.500
But here's a fact.
01:24:38.500 --> 01:24:39.500
For the most part, vaccines were voluntary.
01:24:39.500 --> 01:24:42.500
Separate people worked in the government, firemen, policemen, things like that, hospital workers.
01:24:42.500 --> 01:24:44.500
But for the vast majority of the public over 65, you could make your choice.
01:24:44.500 --> 01:24:48.500
Over age 65, over 97% of people chose to be vaccinated.
01:24:48.500 --> 01:24:51.500
So this whole idea, you know, Anthony Fauci will interview the New York Times and they'll be like,
01:24:51.500 --> 01:24:54.500
oh, if we didn't have such a vaccine hesitancy, billions of people died.
01:24:54.500 --> 01:24:55.500
People at risk are not stupid.
01:24:55.500 --> 01:24:56.500
People read the newspaper.
01:24:56.500 --> 01:24:57.500
They saw this on the news.
01:24:57.500 --> 01:25:00.500
And no matter what they kept telling us about young people getting sick, that was extraordinary.
01:25:00.500 --> 01:25:02.500
This was a disease almost entirely of the elderly.
01:25:02.500 --> 01:25:03.500
The elderly got it and they all got vaccinated.
01:25:03.500 --> 01:25:05.500
Now if you want to look at 30-year-old, tell me I'm going to have a vaccine, it's like 20 or 30%.
01:25:05.500 --> 01:25:06.500
Well, guess what?
01:25:06.500 --> 01:25:07.500
Very few 30-year-olds died.
01:25:07.500 --> 01:25:08.500
And most of that was associated with obesity.
01:25:08.500 --> 01:25:09.500
And they should have promoted that.
01:25:09.500 --> 01:25:11.500
Instead, they said it had racial origins, and this and that.
01:25:11.500 --> 01:25:12.500
No, overweight people were significantly risk.
01:25:12.500 --> 01:25:15.500
And I know several people who died in their 30s and 40s were who got very sick.
01:25:15.500 --> 01:25:17.500
And obesity was a huge factor in this disease.
01:25:17.500 --> 01:25:20.500
One other Republican policy to ask you about.
01:25:20.500 --> 01:25:25.500
Governor, no mention of the fact that all the people are dying in the hospital.
01:25:25.500 --> 01:25:29.500
No mention of hospital protocols, just fat people.
01:25:29.500 --> 01:25:31.500
Francis in Florida, I think, did a great job.
01:25:31.500 --> 01:25:32.500
He kept the state open.
01:25:32.500 --> 01:25:34.500
Kids in school did better than other states.
01:25:35.500 --> 01:25:39.500
But he also, in his venom against vaccine mandates and mask mandates, said,
01:25:39.500 --> 01:25:42.500
you're not allowed in your store to require customers to have a mask.
01:25:42.500 --> 01:25:43.500
No, that's wrong.
01:25:43.500 --> 01:25:44.500
And I think he went too far.
01:25:44.500 --> 01:25:47.500
He did the same thing with the commercial cruisers, you know, the cruise lines.
01:25:47.500 --> 01:25:49.500
He said to them, oh, you can't have a vaccine mandate.
01:25:49.500 --> 01:25:52.500
In mistakes, and this is a real problem between public and private.
01:25:52.500 --> 01:25:54.500
Libertarians believe that the government should enforce you to do things,
01:25:54.500 --> 01:25:56.500
but we have no problem with a private entity.
01:25:56.500 --> 01:25:59.500
So if you have a restaurant and you are all in on the mask and all in on the vaccines,
01:25:59.500 --> 01:26:00.500
nothing should ever stop you.
01:26:00.500 --> 01:26:03.500
You can demand 10 vaccines and 10 masks if you want.
01:26:03.500 --> 01:26:05.500
The only other problem on the side of, well, is this government or not,
01:26:05.500 --> 01:26:07.500
is that the government best practices sort of push some of this down.
01:26:07.500 --> 01:26:10.500
So when Fauci says it and the CDC makes it their official plan and you have a private restaurant,
01:26:10.500 --> 01:26:13.500
and you want to do no masks and no vaccines, you worry about being sued then.
01:26:13.500 --> 01:26:16.500
So there is this pressure from government, but I don't think the answer is to then regulate you
01:26:16.500 --> 01:26:17.500
as a private business and say, you can't do it.
01:26:17.500 --> 01:26:20.500
The answer is to tell people at the top, you need to quit putting out these pronouncements
01:26:20.500 --> 01:26:23.500
that are not scientific and are not certain because you're making a liability problem
01:26:23.500 --> 01:26:25.500
for businesses who feel like, you know, they don't want to follow your mandates,
01:26:25.500 --> 01:26:26.500
but they've eventually become mandates these edicts.
01:26:26.500 --> 01:26:29.500
I used to think that for public, we'd learn from these government mistakes and say,
01:26:29.500 --> 01:26:31.500
maybe I'm not going to be so trusting next time.
01:26:31.500 --> 01:26:32.500
But I don't think they will.
01:26:32.500 --> 01:26:33.500
I don't know.
01:26:33.500 --> 01:26:34.500
I think you'd be surprised.
01:26:34.500 --> 01:26:35.500
I think people have learned from this.
01:26:35.500 --> 01:26:38.500
And I think people learned what to trust and what not to trust and to be skeptical.
01:26:38.500 --> 01:26:40.500
So I think people will be smarter the next time around.
01:26:40.500 --> 01:26:42.500
And my hope is that people are smart enough not to do the lockdowns.
01:26:42.500 --> 01:26:44.500
I mean, if you look at the lockdowns, pretty much some people got it.
01:26:44.500 --> 01:26:45.500
And unfortunately, it is somewhat partisan.
01:26:45.500 --> 01:26:48.500
The Republican states had less severe lockdowns and more quickly got out of it.
01:26:48.500 --> 01:26:49.500
The Democrat states didn't.
01:26:49.500 --> 01:26:51.500
I think it was Rasmussen did a poll of people.
01:26:51.500 --> 01:26:52.500
And it's amazing.
01:26:52.500 --> 01:26:55.500
If you poll people who identify as Democrats, a good half of them believe maybe you should
01:26:55.500 --> 01:26:58.500
put people in jail for not being vaccinated or they should be forcibly kept in their homes.
01:26:58.500 --> 01:27:01.500
So the authoritarianism or what I call the impulse to authoritarianism is strong.
01:27:01.500 --> 01:27:03.500
This seems to be divided between the parties.
01:27:03.500 --> 01:27:05.500
The sad thing is the left used to be good about civil rights.
01:27:05.500 --> 01:27:09.500
They used to be good about, you know, free spirit, free ideas, not having things be censored
01:27:09.500 --> 01:27:10.500
and unified by some kind of government authority.
01:27:10.500 --> 01:27:12.500
But we've really gotten away from that.
01:27:12.500 --> 01:27:14.500
Republicans are authoritarians about other things.
01:27:14.500 --> 01:27:15.500
I'm not saying the party is perfect.
01:27:15.500 --> 01:27:17.500
In fact, sometimes the pox on both parties may be the best answer.
01:27:17.500 --> 01:27:20.500
But on the COVID, I think it has been that the Republicans have tended to be more right
01:27:20.500 --> 01:27:23.500
than wrong and the Democrats have tended to be more restrictive on personal behavior.
01:27:23.500 --> 01:27:24.500
The big point in deception.
01:27:24.500 --> 01:27:28.500
I believed it when they, everybody was saying, came from animals, from bats.
01:27:28.500 --> 01:27:31.500
That's gathered in China for food.
01:27:31.500 --> 01:27:33.500
Probably 90% confident that the new coronavirus came from bats.
01:27:33.500 --> 01:27:34.500
I initially was there too.
01:27:34.500 --> 01:27:36.500
For New Alec, probably a lot of 2020.
01:27:36.500 --> 01:27:39.500
I did not spend a lot of time thinking about the origin because I knew the first SARS virus,
01:27:39.500 --> 01:27:42.500
which came out in 2003, 2004, came from animals, came from civits.
01:27:42.500 --> 01:27:45.500
When they tested the thing is the left used to be good about civil rights.
01:27:45.500 --> 01:27:50.500
They used to be good about, you know, free spirit, free ideas, not having things be censored
01:27:50.500 --> 01:27:52.500
and unified by some kind of government authority.
01:27:52.500 --> 01:27:54.500
But we've really gotten away from that.
01:27:54.500 --> 01:27:56.500
Republicans are authoritarians about other things.
01:27:56.500 --> 01:27:58.500
I'm not saying the party is perfect.
01:27:58.500 --> 01:28:01.500
In fact, sometimes the pox on both parties may be the best answer.
01:28:01.500 --> 01:28:04.500
But on the COVID, I think it has been that the Republicans have tended to be more right
01:28:04.500 --> 01:28:07.500
than wrong and the Democrats have tended to be more restrictive on personal behavior.
01:28:07.500 --> 01:28:09.500
The big point in deception.
01:28:09.500 --> 01:28:14.500
I believed it when they, everybody was saying, came from animals, from bats.
01:28:14.500 --> 01:28:17.500
That's gathered in China for food.
01:28:17.500 --> 01:28:20.500
Probably 90% confident that the new coronavirus came from bats.
01:28:20.500 --> 01:28:22.500
I initially was there too for the ballot.
01:28:22.500 --> 01:28:23.500
Probably a lot of 2020.
01:28:23.500 --> 01:28:27.500
I did not spend a lot of time thinking about the origin because I knew the first SARS virus,
01:28:27.500 --> 01:28:31.500
which came out in 2003, 2004, came from animals, came from civits.
01:28:31.500 --> 01:28:34.500
When they tested the handlers of the civits, they found an increased number of them had antibodies.
01:28:34.500 --> 01:28:35.500
They'd been having infections.
01:28:35.500 --> 01:28:37.500
MERS was another SARS virus.
01:28:37.500 --> 01:28:39.500
It came out and they found it in camels and they found a source.
01:28:39.500 --> 01:28:41.500
Each time they found the source though, within a few months.
01:28:41.500 --> 01:28:44.500
So after a few months in 2020, they didn't find an animal source.
01:28:44.500 --> 01:28:48.500
Then the big game reports of 80,000 animals being tested, no animals with it.
01:28:48.500 --> 01:28:52.500
Tested by China all over China because they were looking for an animal source.
01:28:52.500 --> 01:28:55.500
And you have to realize that the Chinese, while they may not always be honest,
01:28:55.500 --> 01:28:59.500
and they may not always be forthright, they had an incentive to try to find it if it was in animals
01:28:59.500 --> 01:29:01.500
because now the theory is that it came from a lab.
01:29:01.500 --> 01:29:05.500
So now it's sort of government sponsored, accidental, likely, but more related to the government.
01:29:05.500 --> 01:29:07.500
So if you're the Chinese government, you're looking for blame.
01:29:07.500 --> 01:29:08.500
Everybody knows it's starting to move on.
01:29:08.500 --> 01:29:10.500
You'd really want it to come from the wet market.
01:29:10.500 --> 01:29:13.500
But pretty much within three or four months, the CDC in China said it didn't.
01:29:13.500 --> 01:29:16.500
They were pretty certain it did not come from the wet market.
01:29:16.500 --> 01:29:18.500
So some other experts say, we're not sure.
01:29:18.500 --> 01:29:20.500
It may have come from animals.
01:29:20.500 --> 01:29:22.500
There's not a smoking gun that we can say with 100% certainty.
01:29:22.500 --> 01:29:24.500
There's a lot of evidence on both sides of the ledger.
01:29:24.500 --> 01:29:28.500
But the lack of an animal host, the lack of antibodies in animal handlers,
01:29:28.500 --> 01:29:32.500
the lack of diversity in the genetics of this.
01:29:32.500 --> 01:29:37.500
When an animal virus comes to healers, the lack of an animal host,
01:29:37.500 --> 01:29:42.500
the lack of antibodies in animal handlers, the lack of an animal host,
01:29:42.500 --> 01:29:44.500
the lack of antibodies in animal handlers,
01:29:44.500 --> 01:29:47.500
the lack of diversity in the genetics of this.
01:29:47.500 --> 01:29:51.500
When an animal virus comes to humans, it's not very infectious initially.
01:29:51.500 --> 01:29:53.500
So if it's in civits, it's very infectious in civits,
01:29:53.500 --> 01:29:55.500
because it's been circulating in this animal for a while.
01:29:55.500 --> 01:29:58.500
When it infects a human, it's more prone to be in the civits.
01:29:58.500 --> 01:30:00.500
So it's not very good at infecting other humans.
01:30:00.500 --> 01:30:02.500
So it does it again and again until it gets lucky.
01:30:02.500 --> 01:30:05.500
When it gets lucky, it gets in someone's body and it mutates
01:30:05.500 --> 01:30:07.500
and then becomes infectious to other humans.
01:30:07.500 --> 01:30:09.500
So what you find is diversity.
01:30:09.500 --> 01:30:11.500
You find all these leaps from animals to human.
01:30:11.500 --> 01:30:14.500
And so your original genetic diversity will be like one of your 30 different
01:30:14.500 --> 01:30:16.500
genetic sequences of viruses.
01:30:16.500 --> 01:30:17.500
What do we find with COVID?
01:30:17.500 --> 01:30:19.500
The original strain, it's single source.
01:30:19.500 --> 01:30:22.500
It's one genetic variety, wasn't mutating.
01:30:22.500 --> 01:30:26.500
When you have a single genetic homogenous genetic code for a virus,
01:30:26.500 --> 01:30:28.500
it looks like it came from one source.
01:30:28.500 --> 01:30:30.500
It looks like it came from the lab.
01:30:30.500 --> 01:30:33.500
It will have come from one clone.
01:30:33.500 --> 01:30:35.500
And that's the trick.
01:30:35.500 --> 01:30:40.500
If it comes from a wild source, it will have a diversity of sequences
01:30:40.500 --> 01:30:44.500
that can be summarized by a consensus sequence.
01:30:44.500 --> 01:30:50.500
But the consensus sequence may not actually exist in a complete form.
01:30:50.500 --> 01:30:53.500
And then they understand this.
01:30:53.500 --> 01:30:58.500
More importantly, they understand it well.
01:30:58.500 --> 01:31:00.500
They understand it with nanopore sequencing.
01:31:00.500 --> 01:31:05.500
They understand it from many experiments that have shown how these self-replicating
01:31:06.500 --> 01:31:09.500
RNA entities work in culture.
01:31:09.500 --> 01:31:15.500
The only way to get the purity level that we saw in these different places around the
01:31:15.500 --> 01:31:18.500
world is for it to have started from a single clone source.
01:31:18.500 --> 01:31:23.500
And then they had to make quantities of it, which is actually not that hard.
01:31:23.500 --> 01:31:28.500
And that's what makes the infectious clone ideas so wonderful.
01:31:28.500 --> 01:31:30.500
It doesn't require magic.
01:31:30.500 --> 01:31:32.500
It doesn't require new technology.
01:31:33.500 --> 01:31:38.500
It requires very little other than a sequence that you want to put somewhere.
01:31:38.500 --> 01:31:43.500
Maybe with your special epitopes that epivacs or someone else found as they worked for
01:31:43.500 --> 01:31:50.500
the DOD trying to find universal epitopes that stimulated T cells via the MHC presentation
01:31:50.500 --> 01:31:52.500
process.
01:31:52.500 --> 01:31:57.500
And they put a few of those epitopes into a hypothetical coronavirus that they put in a
01:31:57.500 --> 01:32:02.500
few different people that they knew they were going to sequence.
01:32:02.500 --> 01:32:05.500
And then they said, well, we found this spike protein.
01:32:05.500 --> 01:32:09.500
I guess we'll use the spike protein for our vaccine.
01:32:09.500 --> 01:32:13.500
Isn't it great how it works for like a five shots in a row?
01:32:13.500 --> 01:32:16.500
That's pretty special, isn't it?
01:32:16.500 --> 01:32:22.500
Maybe it's because there's a universal T cell epitope that they found back in 2005.
01:32:23.500 --> 01:32:28.500
It's been inserted into a relatively benign coronavirus that's in the background all over
01:32:28.500 --> 01:32:37.500
the world so that when they found it in certain places, they'd find that sequence.
01:32:37.500 --> 01:32:42.500
Can you imagine a scenario where there would be so much power and so much money at stake
01:32:42.500 --> 01:32:49.500
that instead of waiting for a pandemic to come, that they would have orchestrated one?
01:32:53.500 --> 01:32:58.500
So evil Chinese scientists in a lab funded by America?
01:32:58.500 --> 01:33:01.500
America funded it and I think it was maybe not done it with evil intentions.
01:33:01.500 --> 01:33:05.500
It was done with misguided notion that gain-of-function research was safe.
01:33:05.500 --> 01:33:07.500
And so many people explain gain-of-function research.
01:33:07.500 --> 01:33:11.500
Gain-of-function is when you take a virus that exists in nature and another virus in nature
01:33:11.500 --> 01:33:13.500
and you take part of one virus and stick it on to the other.
01:33:13.500 --> 01:33:16.500
So one of the things that they can do with coronavirus, they take an S protein, they
01:33:16.500 --> 01:33:17.500
stick it on another virus.
01:33:17.500 --> 01:33:20.500
But then they say, well, then let's see what it does to humans.
01:33:20.500 --> 01:33:24.500
Well, the thing is they sometimes create viruses that don't exist in nature that are now more
01:33:24.500 --> 01:33:25.500
infectious.
01:33:25.500 --> 01:33:29.500
They've gained the function of lethality or infectiousness by being combined in a lab.
01:33:29.500 --> 01:33:32.500
We know they were doing this and this is one of the things that we discover in the book
01:33:32.500 --> 01:33:37.500
and one of the things that we put out there, Fauci admits on February 1st of 2020 at the
01:33:37.500 --> 01:33:41.500
very beginning that they're doing gain-of-function research in the Wuhan labs and that we funded it.
01:33:41.500 --> 01:33:46.500
And the purpose of it is to let the virus thrive and then develop a vaccine, find a way to kill it.
01:33:46.500 --> 01:33:47.500
Probably.
01:33:47.500 --> 01:33:48.500
Just probably.
01:33:48.500 --> 01:33:50.500
But this is they were working on something like that.
01:33:50.500 --> 01:33:55.500
They were working on a vaccine, what they call a pan-coronav vaccine for all different types of
01:33:55.500 --> 01:33:56.500
coronaviruses, which is what COVID is.
01:33:56.500 --> 01:33:59.500
They were working on this vaccine and that it must have leaked out.
01:33:59.500 --> 01:34:04.500
Other information that supports this is we know that three people in the Wuhan lab run by Dr.
01:34:04.500 --> 01:34:08.500
She, three of her co-workers, got sick with the virus of unknown origin in November of 2019.
01:34:08.500 --> 01:34:16.500
So this would make sense if they were inserting epitopes into a clone of a coronavirus to try
01:34:16.500 --> 01:34:24.500
and increase its immunogenicity, to increase the likelihood that you would develop antibodies
01:34:24.500 --> 01:34:30.500
to the receptor binding domain of the spike protein and prevent its binding to its receptor,
01:34:30.500 --> 01:34:31.500
maybe.
01:34:31.500 --> 01:34:38.500
If we go along with all the elaborate details of the purported biology of the spike protein
01:34:38.500 --> 01:34:43.500
on this coronavirus, then we could tell that story.
01:34:43.500 --> 01:34:50.500
But it's a story that's a lot more complicated and yet a lot more simple than some magic virus
01:34:50.500 --> 01:34:57.500
that they were cutting and pasting together that got out in a laboratory and went from a few hundred
01:34:57.500 --> 01:35:05.500
million copies to trillions and trillions and trillions of copies over three years.
01:35:05.500 --> 01:35:12.500
Because the presumption is that there were a few people that were infected in Wuhan at some point
01:35:12.500 --> 01:35:18.500
and now there are a few million people infected every day.
01:35:18.500 --> 01:35:24.500
So how is that not possible if we didn't go from a few million viruses to trillions and trillions
01:35:24.500 --> 01:35:27.500
and trillions and trillions of this virus?
01:35:27.500 --> 01:35:35.500
The same sequence that wasn't there before, but it's there now.
01:35:35.500 --> 01:35:40.500
In your neighbors and in your school and in your doctor's office and at the mall
01:35:40.500 --> 01:35:47.500
and at the basketball game, but it wasn't there in 2019, not at all.
01:35:47.500 --> 01:35:48.500
It wasn't there at all.
01:35:48.500 --> 01:35:55.500
This signal was completely absent and then it got out at the Wuhan lab and a few people
01:35:55.500 --> 01:36:02.500
that did something, either they went to a Wuhan market and they got unlucky or they took
01:36:02.500 --> 01:36:07.500
a laboratory animal and sold it at the market or they made some soup out of a laboratory
01:36:07.500 --> 01:36:12.500
animal and then sold it at the market or they got sick in the lab and then they went
01:36:12.500 --> 01:36:15.500
to the market.
01:36:15.500 --> 01:36:24.500
But whatever story you're telling, it starts with a single group, even one infection.
01:36:24.500 --> 01:36:33.500
And then that lowly little swarm of RNA molecules coated in a lipid protein coat with spike
01:36:33.500 --> 01:36:40.500
proteins on the outside, managed to copy itself enough so that billions, billions of
01:36:40.500 --> 01:36:51.500
people were contacted by it, are continued to be contacted by its ancestors today, every
01:36:51.500 --> 01:36:57.500
day, and we can use PCR to test for them.
01:36:57.500 --> 01:37:03.500
And people still use lateral flow tests to test for them.
01:37:03.500 --> 01:37:10.500
And people still stay home because they say they got infected with them.
01:37:10.500 --> 01:37:24.500
Something made of RNA that leaked in Wuhan and then coated the planet.
01:37:24.500 --> 01:37:27.500
It's not possible, ladies and gentlemen, it's just not possible.
01:37:27.500 --> 01:37:32.500
These stories of fantastic biology are just stories.
01:37:32.500 --> 01:37:33.500
They are mythology.
01:37:33.500 --> 01:37:40.500
And Rand Paul may not be sophisticated enough to know how ridiculous it is to attribute these
01:37:40.500 --> 01:37:45.500
superpowers to an RNA in lipid.
01:37:45.500 --> 01:37:48.500
But that's what he's doing.
01:37:48.500 --> 01:37:54.500
You see, the thing is, is that all of these principles of a species like ecology and
01:37:54.500 --> 01:38:01.500
niche and pathogen and parasite and all these terms that we use to describe different kinds
01:38:01.500 --> 01:38:06.500
of animals and different niches and different ecological relationships like predator and
01:38:06.500 --> 01:38:15.500
prey, none of these biological concepts apply to viruses because viruses do not rise to
01:38:15.500 --> 01:38:19.500
the sophistication of species.
01:38:19.500 --> 01:38:23.500
Viruses are a phenomenon that are not well understood.
01:38:23.500 --> 01:38:30.500
They are a phenomenon that is not understood at the fidelity of a species like gray squirrel
01:38:30.500 --> 01:38:35.500
or a particular mosquito.
01:38:35.500 --> 01:38:44.500
And they don't have the same biological attributes as a pathogen in a insect pathogen on a squirrel
01:38:44.500 --> 01:38:48.500
like a tick.
01:38:48.500 --> 01:38:57.500
These are RNA and DNA-based phenomenon, molecular phenomenon, that as best we can discern are
01:38:57.500 --> 01:39:04.500
able to use our own cellular machinery to replicate themselves in the right circumstances.
01:39:04.500 --> 01:39:11.500
But our immune system has a wide variety of cells which are bent on destroying these
01:39:11.500 --> 01:39:14.500
short-lived patterned integrities.
01:39:14.500 --> 01:39:20.500
There are erroneous patterned integrities in the best characterization.
01:39:20.500 --> 01:39:25.500
But they cannot be considered something that has the fidelity and capability of something
01:39:25.500 --> 01:39:30.500
like a mosquito that can have babies and more babies and more babies until everybody's
01:39:30.500 --> 01:39:33.500
got mosquitoes everywhere.
01:39:33.500 --> 01:39:40.500
And even we know that if a mosquito was released in Wuhan and it could breed as fast as possible
01:39:40.500 --> 01:39:44.500
the mosquitoes that made it to Italy would not be the same mosquitoes that made it to
01:39:44.500 --> 01:39:46.500
America.
01:39:46.500 --> 01:39:50.500
They would have already diversified.
01:39:50.500 --> 01:39:56.500
And mosquitoes replicate with a lot higher fidelity than an RNA virus does.
01:39:56.500 --> 01:40:04.500
It makes a complete new genome every time it successfully manages to copy itself,
01:40:04.500 --> 01:40:07.500
which it doesn't do very often.
01:40:07.500 --> 01:40:11.500
Because as the virologist will say, well, we need a lot more of the subgenomic RNA than
01:40:11.500 --> 01:40:12.500
we do the genomic RNA.
01:40:12.500 --> 01:40:15.500
That's why we can barely find any genomic RNA.
01:40:15.500 --> 01:40:20.500
And we find all these extra subgenomic RNAs because all these other proteins need to be
01:40:20.500 --> 01:40:21.500
made a lot more.
01:40:21.500 --> 01:40:25.500
We need to make a lot more spike protein and a lot more N protein.
01:40:25.500 --> 01:40:34.500
That's why we have 600,000 copies of the N protein RNA and 100,000 copies of the spike
01:40:34.500 --> 01:40:39.500
protein RNA and only 11 genomes.
01:40:39.500 --> 01:40:42.500
Because we need a lot more spike protein than we need whole genomes.
01:40:42.500 --> 01:40:44.500
So that's why they're really hard to detect.
01:40:44.500 --> 01:40:49.500
We barely find any anywhere ever.
01:40:49.500 --> 01:40:55.500
These are the kinds of excuses that they make and the kinds of stories that they tell about
01:40:55.500 --> 01:41:01.500
the fidelity of a virus that can possibly start in one city in the world and manage to coat
01:41:01.500 --> 01:41:11.500
the universe, coat the known world with itself.
01:41:11.500 --> 01:41:14.500
That's some pretty extraordinary molecular biology right there.
01:41:14.500 --> 01:41:18.500
And Rand Paul is pretty extraordinarily certain that it happened.
01:41:18.500 --> 01:41:22.500
They never revealed this, but it's been found out through some intelligence means.
01:41:22.500 --> 01:41:26.500
We do know now that the virus actually started and the first case is patient zero basically
01:41:26.500 --> 01:41:27.500
is in her lab.
01:41:27.500 --> 01:41:31.500
And that was more than a thousand kilometers away from where bats live.
01:41:31.500 --> 01:41:34.500
Exactly. It's six to eight hours by car south when you find the bats.
01:41:34.500 --> 01:41:38.500
But this gets back to the question of evil versus just bad sense or bad judgment.
01:41:38.500 --> 01:41:43.500
If viruses exist, let's say they exist 300 feet below the level in guano in a cave.
01:41:43.500 --> 01:41:46.500
The likelihood that that virus 300 feet under the ground in a remote air of China is going to
01:41:46.500 --> 01:41:49.500
interact with a lot of people and cause a pandemic, virtually zero.
01:41:49.500 --> 01:41:52.500
But what if we send virus hunters 300 feet down into the cave, they extract the virus,
01:41:52.500 --> 01:41:55.500
bring it back to a metropolitan area of 15 million people.
01:41:55.500 --> 01:41:59.500
There's a chance that somewhere in that transmission, the virus leaks out that never
01:41:59.500 --> 01:42:01.500
would have encountered man, but it's worse.
01:42:01.500 --> 01:42:04.500
They take this unknown virus, they bring it back to Wuhan 15 million people and they say,
01:42:04.500 --> 01:42:06.500
yeah, this is a new virus, a new coronavirus.
01:42:06.500 --> 01:42:08.500
What would happen if we mixed it with this other coronavirus?
01:42:08.500 --> 01:42:11.500
So the whole virus identification project, which has been going on for life.
01:42:11.500 --> 01:42:15.500
So the viruses have the potential to do the evil.
01:42:15.500 --> 01:42:22.500
It's not making lots of copies of this RNA that can't copy itself with eye fidelity.
01:42:22.500 --> 01:42:28.500
And then letting that copy out, it wouldn't be transfecting people with some of these
01:42:28.500 --> 01:42:31.500
viral proteins and seeing what happens in large quantities.
01:42:31.500 --> 01:42:36.500
It wouldn't be making large copies, at large quantities of these RNAs that they find at
01:42:36.500 --> 01:42:37.500
the bottom of the bat cave.
01:42:37.500 --> 01:42:43.500
It's just taking that RNA out of the cave because the RNA itself is magic.
01:42:43.500 --> 01:42:50.500
It has nothing to do with the fact that the people have to make a large quantity of it
01:42:50.500 --> 01:42:52.500
or they can do anything with it in the laboratory.
01:42:52.500 --> 01:42:58.500
There's nothing to do with that so much so that we don't even have to use the term clone.
01:42:58.500 --> 01:43:04.500
Even though that's how they work with these RNA entities, they have to make a clone of it.
01:43:04.500 --> 01:43:10.500
You can't grow it.
01:43:10.500 --> 01:43:15.500
And so here we are talking about finding viruses in a bat cave, coming back and sewing them
01:43:15.500 --> 01:43:20.500
into different parts and not admitting that if we're going to sew two parts of a virus
01:43:20.500 --> 01:43:22.500
together, a virus sequence together.
01:43:22.500 --> 01:43:29.500
And the only way we can find out how that work is to make a clone.
01:43:29.500 --> 01:43:33.500
You can't sew it together unless you make a clone.
01:43:33.500 --> 01:43:37.500
It's literally the way you would do it.
01:43:37.500 --> 01:43:44.500
You would make a DNA construct of the RNA that you thought you found in the wild, which is called a clone.
01:43:45.500 --> 01:43:52.500
And then you can grow that DNA clone into huge quantities in commercial processes that were the same
01:43:52.500 --> 01:43:58.500
commercial processes that are used to make monoclonal antibodies and were used to make the spike protein
01:43:58.500 --> 01:44:03.500
RNA for the shots and used to make the spike protein for the protein.
01:44:03.500 --> 01:44:08.500
I mean, it's all the same crap.
01:44:08.500 --> 01:44:11.500
Bacteria will copy circular DNA.
01:44:11.500 --> 01:44:14.500
You encode the RNA that you want to make in the circular DNA.
01:44:14.500 --> 01:44:20.500
Let the Bacteria make lots of copies of the DNA, had relatively high fidelity because DNA
01:44:20.500 --> 01:44:21.500
copying is high fidelity.
01:44:21.500 --> 01:44:29.500
Then you take all that DNA out of the bacteria, has best you can, and convert it via enzyme to RNA.
01:44:29.500 --> 01:44:34.500
That conversion is not perfect, but it's a hell of a lot better and a hell of a lot more quantity
01:44:34.500 --> 01:44:41.500
of any RNA approximating the original protein or the original genome that you want to have,
01:44:41.500 --> 01:44:48.500
the stitch together, gain a function genome in more quantities than you could ever make in any other
01:44:48.500 --> 01:44:50.500
fashion.
01:44:50.500 --> 01:44:57.500
In fact, this is the only way that we know how we could make it in any quantity this fashion.
01:44:57.500 --> 01:45:00.500
Infectious clones.
01:45:00.500 --> 01:45:03.500
Otherwise, it's not dangerous at all.
01:45:03.500 --> 01:45:08.500
Otherwise, at best, the infectious clone will make somebody sick.
01:45:08.500 --> 01:45:12.500
And that person will shed some RNA on somebody else and they'll get sick.
01:45:12.500 --> 01:45:20.500
And then by that time, that RNA isn't copying itself well enough anymore.
01:45:20.500 --> 01:45:22.500
And there ends the pandemic.
01:45:22.500 --> 01:45:24.500
That's probably what happened with SARS-1.
01:45:24.500 --> 01:45:26.500
It was an infectious clone, a certain quantity of it.
01:45:26.500 --> 01:45:31.500
It got out, and those people were able to carry it and spread it around and spread it around a little bit.
01:45:31.500 --> 01:45:34.500
Why not?
01:45:34.500 --> 01:45:41.500
And every time it went from a different person, it changed at least 50 amino acids in the sequence they could detect.
01:45:41.500 --> 01:45:45.500
It's not the variation he's talking about.
01:45:45.500 --> 01:45:50.500
The variation should have been from patient to patient to patient, and it wasn't.
01:45:50.500 --> 01:45:55.500
There wasn't any variation from patient to patient, which tells you one thing and one thing only.
01:45:55.500 --> 01:45:58.500
It had to be a clone.
01:45:58.500 --> 01:46:07.500
Because it was a naturally replicating virus, every patient would have had a pretty different signal.
01:46:07.500 --> 01:46:09.500
And that would have petered out very quickly.
01:46:09.500 --> 01:46:22.500
It would have gone in a million different directions genetically, very quickly, and petered out because that's what SARS-CoV-1 did.
01:46:22.500 --> 01:46:28.500
The story is so full of holes, they have to simplify it to a cartoon.
01:46:28.500 --> 01:46:33.500
And that cartoon is what Rand Paul has learned to recite.
01:46:33.500 --> 01:46:39.500
About ten years or more, hundreds of millions of dollars have gone into this US dollars has been not just to identify every virus on the planet,
01:46:39.500 --> 01:46:44.500
but to identify it and then do gain-of-function research to manipulate it to see what happens.
01:46:44.500 --> 01:46:45.500
And there are legitimate scientists.
01:46:45.500 --> 01:46:51.500
There's Kevin Esvelte, who we quote in the book from MIT, who says that basically this is a risk to civilization.
01:46:51.500 --> 01:46:58.500
So Kevin Esvelte of MIT has written the gate-of-function research looks like a gamble that civilization can't afford to risk.
01:46:58.500 --> 01:47:12.500
Kevin Esvelte, the guy who working for MIT Media Labs and working for the Department of Defense through various connections has developed the gene drive,
01:47:12.500 --> 01:47:19.500
is saying that gain-of-function research looks like a gamble that civilization can't afford to risk.
01:47:19.500 --> 01:47:27.500
I'm going to tell you right now that this is the best confirmation that gain-of-function research is a mythology that they could have ever rolled out
01:47:27.500 --> 01:47:32.500
and that he could have ever accentuated by highlighting it in his book.
01:47:32.500 --> 01:47:36.500
Because Kevin Esvelte is the perfecter of the gene drive.
01:47:36.500 --> 01:47:41.500
So the gene drive was actually invented by somebody else, but Kevin Esvelte got his brain around it
01:47:41.500 --> 01:47:50.500
and was able to perfect it in a way that basically allows them to change species.
01:47:50.500 --> 01:48:01.500
Now they are sort of limited by the replication rate, the reproductive rate of a species, but they can create genes that really edit themselves in
01:48:01.500 --> 01:48:06.500
and are very aggressive in that sense, hyper-dominant.
01:48:06.500 --> 01:48:13.500
And I've been trying to slowly but surely teach myself the biology of these things in a cartoon form so that I can teach you.
01:48:13.500 --> 01:48:29.500
And so either by the end of the year or in the coming, you know, after the new year, some of the subjects that we're going to cover are these interesting biotechnology applications
01:48:29.500 --> 01:48:47.500
like directed evolution for enzymes, which is also coincidentally another technology which Kevin Esvelte has been really a leader and a pioneer in conceiving the ways that bacterial, metabolic enzyme pathways
01:48:47.500 --> 01:49:08.500
and genetic antibiotic resistance and culture techniques can be combined in very clever ways to use the power of bacterial evolution essentially
01:49:08.500 --> 01:49:18.500
to create enzymes with attributes that we want them to have and to do it very, very well.
01:49:18.500 --> 01:49:34.500
So Kevin Esvelte is an incredibly interesting person to quote and to get on this senatorial committee in 2020 along with Richard Ebright, who is a magnificent tool of this narrative.
01:49:34.500 --> 01:49:48.500
Richard Ebright is the guy who said if we opened colleges in 2020 that we would kill a quarter million people and Richard Ebright is really one of the worst of the narrative holders of this gain of function research is going to kill the world.
01:49:48.500 --> 01:50:09.500
And him and Kevin Esvelte testified in front of Congress about this super danger of gain of function research all the while both knowing that Kevin Esvelte was like the master, the Jedi master of dark arts of biology, the directed evolution and gene drives,
01:50:09.500 --> 01:50:31.500
which is just extraordinary. It's really, really can only be seen as some kind of intellectual warfare to use him as this messenger is really like using a serial killer to say that the, I don't know that the vaccine schedules dangerous for kids.
01:50:31.500 --> 01:50:40.500
I mean, it's, it's crazy for him to say that gain of function research is a gamble that civilization can't afford to risk while he's working on gene drives.
01:50:40.500 --> 01:50:50.500
Like it's just extraordinary to me. And now I'm sure that we're about to say that Kevin Esvelte would say that billions of people could be killed by the next virus.
01:50:50.500 --> 01:50:57.500
We could wind up with a virus that's 50% lethal that leaks out of a lab. There it is. Holy cow and like one second. Look at that.
01:50:57.500 --> 01:51:07.500
MIT who says that basically this is a risk civilization because we could wind up with a virus that's 50% lethal that leaks out of a lab and kills half of the planet that literally is a possibility.
01:51:07.500 --> 01:51:17.500
That's literally not a possibility. It's literally not a possibility. The only possibility is that we could make enough of an RNA that was toxic that would do that.
01:51:17.500 --> 01:51:29.500
That we could make enough of a toxin that would do that. We could make enough of a protein toxin and RNA toxin. Maybe there's even a DNA sequence or application that DNA could also be used to do this.
01:51:29.500 --> 01:51:32.500
Like an adenovirus.
01:51:32.500 --> 01:51:43.500
I'm sure we could make enough, but there is not a small, you know, little vial of this 50% deadly virus is enough to kill the whole planet.
01:51:43.500 --> 01:51:55.500
That's just that's just complete immunomethology. And it is nothing. It's not even immunomethology with regards to that's not how viruses work.
01:51:55.500 --> 01:52:05.500
You know, they kill their host and then it won't spread. That argument is dumb. The real argument is that RNA doesn't have the fidelity to do that.
01:52:05.500 --> 01:52:12.500
If mother nature were to stumble upon a super deadly RNA, it wouldn't last long enough to kill that many people.
01:52:12.500 --> 01:52:16.500
It might kill. I don't know. I could imagine.
01:52:16.500 --> 01:52:28.500
If I really run my simulator in my head to the fullest, I can imagine a scenario where a whole village of people might be killed by a virus that was in a monkey that somebody ate.
01:52:28.500 --> 01:52:42.500
Maybe 30 people. But unless there was a quantity of it, a quantity of it, then it's not possible for an RNA virus to do that, to accomplish it.
01:52:42.500 --> 01:52:49.500
It's just not possible. The human immune system is not that kind of a, it's not.
01:52:50.500 --> 01:53:05.500
It's just extraordinary that we have been led to believe this, that they are trying to mislead our children to believe this and we cannot let it happen because they are essentially, they are desecrating the image of our body.
01:53:06.500 --> 01:53:24.500
The image in our own minds about our body and its weaknesses and its strengths and its sacredness, they are just absolutely ruining this for our children and it's wrong.
01:53:25.500 --> 01:53:42.500
It's wrong to the deepest core and the fact that they're having this discussion pretending that they're having a real, this is the worst kind of sacrilege that there is because they have not once acknowledged the lying.
01:53:42.500 --> 01:53:46.500
It's mistakes, they didn't mean it. I think they all meant well.
01:53:46.500 --> 01:54:00.500
These are all things that they said. It's not very much different than that college professor that said I was also really down for the lockdowns, but we got to have some, you know, whatever sympathy going forward or some crap like that.
01:54:01.500 --> 01:54:14.500
Liars don't deserve sympathy. People that were absolute monsters don't deserve sympathy unless they're really apologizing, not kind of sorry.
01:54:17.500 --> 01:54:23.500
They're trying to find ways to stop disease, but many scientists have now looked at this and said that we haven't found it.
01:54:24.500 --> 01:54:38.500
The other argument against this is that when you create viruses in the lab, evolution is random, and so when a virus or a dangerous virus evolves, it does it through random mutation, and then something we get an unlucky one and it takes off.
01:54:38.500 --> 01:54:44.500
If you create it in the virus in the lab, it's not random, it's man-made, and you say I'm doing this so I can discover what's going to come from nature.
01:54:44.500 --> 01:54:52.500
Well, because it's random and there are millions of different combinations that could happen, the likelihood that you create something that creates a vaccine that's going to help anybody is pretty slim to none.
01:54:53.500 --> 01:55:02.500
Not if you're looking for universal epitopes that activate T cells just in general, and then you're putting it in other proteins so that you can make other vaccines.
01:55:03.500 --> 01:55:15.500
I mean, activating the immune system is a multi-billion dollar industry every year that's completely free of strict liability. It's the best business on the planet.
01:55:15.500 --> 01:55:31.500
So the more risk that we can create perceived in nature for the requirement of vaccines, the more danger that Mother Nature poses to us, the more danger that gain a function in a laboratory, the more danger that gain a function in a garage.
01:55:32.500 --> 01:55:39.500
Poses to us the more likely we are to accept the idea that vaccines are a cure for these things.
01:55:39.500 --> 01:55:44.500
Antibodies. Yada yada yada.
01:55:44.500 --> 01:55:55.500
This is the trap, ladies and gentlemen, it is being laid right before you by the guy who started laying it in 2020 just like he was meant to do.
01:55:55.500 --> 01:55:59.500
We are being governed by lies.
01:56:01.500 --> 01:56:05.500
And it's probably pretty likely that he knows.
01:56:05.500 --> 01:56:09.500
It's probably pretty likely that he knows.
01:56:09.500 --> 01:56:19.500
For COVID, it really started in 2010 with the avian flu. The avian flu is from chickens and birds, and it's very deadly when it gets into humans 50% mortality, but it's not very contagious.
01:56:19.500 --> 01:56:25.500
So a guy in the Netherlands said, why don't we see if we can aerosolize it, make it transmitted by air, even though it's not normally transmitted that way.
01:56:25.500 --> 01:56:32.500
And people said, that's crazy. And he did it. And then there was a discussion over whether the knowledge should be published because it might become a roadmap for chair.
01:56:33.500 --> 01:56:51.500
In 2011, and we're talking about Carriaca, or whatever his name was at the University of Madison in Wisconsin, University of Wisconsin in Madison, that supposedly enriched avian flu to be aerosolized, but one did it.
01:56:51.500 --> 01:56:59.500
And again, this was a controversy. This was a thing that in the Netherlands and in America, they made a big stink about it.
01:56:59.500 --> 01:57:10.500
But it was also the perfect theater, again, to remind people that this potential is there, that this work is being done. Don't forget, we're going to make a big show about it now. We're going to have a few secret meetings.
01:57:10.500 --> 01:57:17.500
We're going to get a bunch of people to do a conference. We're going to invite everybody over the Netherlands and we're going to have a big argument and discussion about it.
01:57:17.500 --> 01:57:22.500
We're going to bring big Tony Fauci over to the Netherlands and he's going to be on stage.
01:57:23.500 --> 01:57:34.500
And all of that pomp and circumstance creates an illusion of consensus that, holy man, we're really walking on a prep of precipice here. What if they create a bird flu that's also aerosolized.
01:57:34.500 --> 01:57:41.500
I can fly around the world and kill 50% of the people it infects. Oh my gosh.
01:57:41.500 --> 01:57:52.500
What if they make a little tiny bit of a bunch of RNAs and what if that little tiny bit of RNA gets out?
01:57:52.500 --> 01:58:01.500
That little tiny bit of RNA might copy itself and go all around the world and kill 50% of the people that it copies itself in.
01:58:01.500 --> 01:58:09.500
Except that's not how RNA works. That's not how RNA copying works and that's not how immune systems work.
01:58:09.500 --> 01:58:20.500
But with a little bit of showmanship and a little bit of news flash and a little bit of headlines and a lot of air travel and hot air on stage.
01:58:20.500 --> 01:58:35.500
You can create the illusion that in these bad caves and in these laboratories exists the possibility of killing 50% of the people of everyone that this RNA replicates in.
01:58:35.500 --> 01:58:41.500
And that the RNA can replicate in anything that it touches.
01:58:41.500 --> 01:58:46.500
And if you have never seen it before, you can't fight it.
01:58:46.500 --> 01:58:52.500
These are all proclamations of a faith that is false.
01:58:52.500 --> 01:58:59.500
These are all proclamations of a biology that doesn't exist.
01:58:59.500 --> 01:59:05.500
These are all proclamations of a faith that is based on lies.
01:59:05.500 --> 01:59:08.500
Stop lying!
01:59:09.500 --> 01:59:11.500
To create this kind of virus.
01:59:11.500 --> 01:59:13.500
And so Anthony Fauci was on one side.
01:59:13.500 --> 01:59:18.500
And Richard E. Bright and the other scientist from the other side had a big war on Anthony Fauci won, like he's won so many times.
01:59:18.500 --> 01:59:24.500
And he said 2012, even if a pandemic occurs, if a scientist becomes infected and the community becomes infected, the knowledge is worth it.
01:59:24.500 --> 01:59:28.500
Well that's a judgment call and I would say there's probably 16 million families around the world who might disagree with that now.
01:59:28.500 --> 01:59:30.500
But this is a real debate that has to be had.
01:59:30.500 --> 01:59:31.500
It's all funded by government.
01:59:31.500 --> 01:59:33.500
Whether government should have some regulations on what they find.
01:59:33.500 --> 01:59:37.500
I think without question we should regulate government more to have more scrutiny over this.
01:59:37.500 --> 01:59:39.500
There's still funding, gain and function research.
01:59:39.500 --> 01:59:40.500
Yeah, absolutely.
01:59:40.500 --> 01:59:42.500
There's 12 different places in the United States that we do this.
01:59:42.500 --> 01:59:46.500
There are some labs that we're not even allowed to go into that we're petitioning to try to find out about this.
01:59:46.500 --> 01:59:49.500
But there's one other important thing that happened in this and it adds to the culpability.
01:59:49.500 --> 01:59:51.500
It wasn't just a bad decision of Anthony Fauci.
01:59:51.500 --> 01:59:52.500
There was a Paul.
01:59:52.500 --> 01:59:53.500
It's between 2014 and 16.
01:59:53.500 --> 01:59:54.500
This was so dangerous.
01:59:54.500 --> 01:59:56.500
They said no more gain and function research.
01:59:56.500 --> 01:59:57.500
And yet it kept happening.
01:59:57.500 --> 01:59:58.500
How did they get these agencies?
01:59:58.500 --> 02:00:02.500
Our government stopped the funding of gain and function research from 2014 to 16.
02:00:02.500 --> 02:00:05.500
And yet many of these things that we were on were still going on through this who approved them.
02:00:05.500 --> 02:00:07.500
But they also set up a committee.
02:00:07.500 --> 02:00:09.500
In 2017, they turned the spigot back on.
02:00:09.500 --> 02:00:13.500
In January of 2017, gain and function is now going to be funded once again.
02:00:13.500 --> 02:00:16.500
But as they turn it on, it's like they set up a committee.
02:00:16.500 --> 02:00:18.500
And this committee is supposed to see all dangerous research and say,
02:00:18.500 --> 02:00:19.500
is it dangerous?
02:00:19.500 --> 02:00:20.500
Should we let it happen?
02:00:20.500 --> 02:00:22.500
None of the Wuhan research went before there.
02:00:22.500 --> 02:00:25.500
So when I question Fauci and committee, he says, all my people, up and down,
02:00:25.500 --> 02:00:27.500
all 12 dozens of experts tell me it's not gain and function.
02:00:27.500 --> 02:00:29.500
It's like, where's the discussion?
02:00:29.500 --> 02:00:31.500
Have you ever heard of a government discussion where there's no paperwork?
02:00:31.500 --> 02:00:33.500
And why didn't it go before the committee?
02:00:33.500 --> 02:00:35.500
And then I'm at the person who's in charge of the safety committee.
02:00:35.500 --> 02:00:37.500
He said he only looked at three studies over like a four-year period.
02:00:37.500 --> 02:00:38.500
And I said, why?
02:00:38.500 --> 02:00:40.500
He says, I didn't have the ability to go out and look at studies.
02:00:40.500 --> 02:00:41.500
It had to be self-referred.
02:00:41.500 --> 02:00:42.500
People had to volunteer.
02:00:42.500 --> 02:00:44.500
I think I'm doing gain and function research.
02:00:44.500 --> 02:00:45.500
Would you look at it?
02:00:45.500 --> 02:00:47.500
And he looked at three and I think they turned down one or two out of three.
02:00:47.500 --> 02:00:49.500
But this was exempted from the safety committee.
02:00:49.500 --> 02:00:51.500
It could have only been done with Anthony Fauci's permission.
02:00:51.500 --> 02:00:53.500
I think we are eventually going to find paperwork.
02:00:53.500 --> 02:00:54.500
We haven't got it yet.
02:00:54.500 --> 02:00:57.500
We're going to find paperwork that shows Anthony Fauci gave permission for the
02:00:57.500 --> 02:01:00.500
research to happen in Wuhan without scrutiny by the safety committee.
02:01:00.500 --> 02:01:03.500
The media is weird.
02:01:03.500 --> 02:01:04.500
It's perplexing.
02:01:04.500 --> 02:01:09.500
Democrats in Congress and the allies in the media are always curious about things killing people.
02:01:09.500 --> 02:01:10.500
You know, danger, safety.
02:01:10.500 --> 02:01:14.500
So I've been to at least a dozen hearings on whether a chemical in plastic causes cancer,
02:01:14.500 --> 02:01:15.500
which I think probably isn't true.
02:01:15.500 --> 02:01:17.500
But the Democrats are gaga over.
02:01:17.500 --> 02:01:20.500
It's like, I can't remember the name of the chemical now, but it's like in baby bottles.
02:01:20.500 --> 02:01:22.500
It's in milk, but it's in all this plastic.
02:01:22.500 --> 02:01:23.500
And they think it causes cancer.
02:01:23.500 --> 02:01:25.500
But may or may not, and I'm not against studying whether it does.
02:01:25.500 --> 02:01:27.500
But at the same time, they're curious about this.
02:01:27.500 --> 02:01:31.500
Now we have a disease that killed maybe 16 million people worldwide, about a million people.
02:01:31.500 --> 02:01:35.500
16 million people worldwide were killed by this disease.
02:01:35.500 --> 02:01:39.500
And he's making fun of the Democrats because they're worried about chemicals in plastic,
02:01:39.500 --> 02:01:44.500
but they're not worried about this disease that killed millions of people around the world.
02:01:44.500 --> 02:01:47.500
Tell me this is not about a faith.
02:01:47.500 --> 02:01:50.500
Tell me this is not about a faith.
02:01:50.500 --> 02:01:55.500
Tell me this is not about preserving a narrative about a novel virus that killed millions of people
02:01:55.500 --> 02:02:00.500
that we save millions more and that is likely from gain of function and therefore could come again
02:02:00.500 --> 02:02:02.500
if we don't do something drastic.
02:02:02.500 --> 02:02:06.500
But we don't want to lock down or anything like that unless, of course, maybe it's 50% lethal,
02:02:06.500 --> 02:02:09.500
and we might have to.
02:02:09.500 --> 02:02:11.500
This is the narrative.
02:02:11.500 --> 02:02:12.500
This is the trap.
02:02:12.500 --> 02:02:15.500
This is not someone trying to save us.
02:02:15.500 --> 02:02:21.500
This is the person and part of the narrative trap that we were led into from the very beginning
02:02:21.500 --> 02:02:26.500
when he was first arguing with Fauci in Congress.
02:02:26.500 --> 02:02:31.500
A million people in America.
02:02:31.500 --> 02:02:36.500
Charles Rixi's been saying that for more than a year and a half, a million people in America,
02:02:36.500 --> 02:02:39.500
and they're not curious as to how we got it and whether it could happen again.
02:02:39.500 --> 02:02:45.500
But that is one of my goals is to create legislation that more strictly regulates gain of function research
02:02:45.500 --> 02:02:46.500
being funded by our government.
02:02:46.500 --> 02:02:50.500
This company, EcoHealth Alliance, most Americans haven't heard of it.
02:02:50.500 --> 02:02:54.500
They were able to accumulate maybe over a hundred million dollars in U.S. taxpayer dollars
02:02:54.500 --> 02:02:56.500
and a lot of it was funneled to Wuhan.
02:02:56.500 --> 02:03:00.500
Interestingly, in 2020, when the virus comes out and the pandemic starting to spread,
02:03:00.500 --> 02:03:02.500
within a month or two, there's a letter to Lancet.
02:03:02.500 --> 02:03:06.500
And in the letter, they say that anybody that's saying that this was a, could have come from the lab
02:03:06.500 --> 02:03:09.500
as a conspiracy theorist and not to be trusted and 20 people signed it.
02:03:09.500 --> 02:03:12.500
But it was led by a guy named Peter Desak who ran EcoHealth.
02:03:12.500 --> 02:03:14.500
He never admitted that he had a conflict of interest.
02:03:14.500 --> 02:03:17.500
Eventually, Lancet caught him and there was an apology made.
02:03:17.500 --> 02:03:19.500
But from the very beginning, and I've never heard of before.
02:03:19.500 --> 02:03:24.500
But it's just so sad because Stanley Perlman was on that.
02:03:24.500 --> 02:03:25.500
Jeremy Ferrar was on that.
02:03:25.500 --> 02:03:28.500
They all knew that it was a lab leak was possible.
02:03:28.500 --> 02:03:33.500
It's not, it isn't, they all knew that they were working with Peter Desak.
02:03:33.500 --> 02:03:35.500
They all knew who Peter Desak was.
02:03:35.500 --> 02:03:38.500
It's not like Peter Desak is the guy who gets busted here.
02:03:38.500 --> 02:03:42.500
It's all those people on that paper should be busted.
02:03:42.500 --> 02:03:46.500
All those people had a vested interest in this not being a lab leak.
02:03:46.500 --> 02:03:49.500
Stanley Perlman knew it was a lab leak if it was anything.
02:03:49.500 --> 02:03:52.500
He knew it had to come from a lab the way that people were acting.
02:03:52.500 --> 02:03:59.500
And the only reason why he would say that it's not a lab leak is because he knew that probably nothing was actually in circulation.
02:03:59.500 --> 02:04:05.500
And a lot of those people probably knew that there wasn't actually anything in circulation.
02:04:05.500 --> 02:04:15.500
And so the reason why you write a denial like that is so that people will argue about the denial instead of arguing about the fact that there might not be anything in circulation.
02:04:16.500 --> 02:04:19.500
It might just be a conflated background signal.
02:04:19.500 --> 02:04:24.500
And so if it's a conflated background signal, are you really lying if you say it's not a lab leak?
02:04:24.500 --> 02:04:26.500
No, you're not.
02:04:28.500 --> 02:04:34.500
And that's why all those people signed it because it was a national security event.
02:04:34.500 --> 02:04:36.500
It's a national security theater.
02:04:38.500 --> 02:04:42.500
And maybe we're double crossing our allies.
02:04:42.500 --> 02:04:46.500
Maybe our allies are double crossing us in this global theater.
02:04:47.500 --> 02:04:52.500
Maybe we're still trying to figure out which of our allies have double crossed us in this theater.
02:04:54.500 --> 02:04:57.500
Maybe we still think we're double crossing one of our allies, but we're not.
02:04:57.500 --> 02:05:00.500
We're actually getting double crossed and we haven't figured it out yet.
02:05:01.500 --> 02:05:11.500
It could be a lot more complicated than just Chinese people lying about American people lying about embezzling money for gain of function research and back cave viruses.
02:05:13.500 --> 02:05:26.500
And it's certainly a lot more complicated than a back cave virus being brought back to a laboratory and then leaked into a market and then spreading around the world all by itself.
02:05:27.500 --> 02:05:34.500
This scientist talking about a conspiracy theory, and it turns out that probably the scientific community is either 50-50 towards the lab leak now or more.
02:05:34.500 --> 02:05:39.500
And initially though, they squelched all dissent and said you're a conspiracy theorist if you're saying this, but they didn't reveal this.
02:05:39.500 --> 02:05:42.500
I do have it on high speed though here. Don't think he's so smart.
02:05:42.500 --> 02:05:55.500
How many of the people in the US government are so comfortable having Chinese researchers who are working for the Chinese government, which they're terrified of, just throwing this money at them?
02:05:56.500 --> 02:06:03.500
Well, you know, Anthony Fauci said that he is the science, but they're really criticizing science because I represent science.
02:06:03.500 --> 02:06:08.500
I think he is the defender of the funding of science, the business of science. There's billions of dollars.
02:06:08.500 --> 02:06:15.500
These are not just people that are, you know, cloistered up in some kind of monastery wanting to try to find the cure for cancer.
02:06:15.500 --> 02:06:21.500
These are people receiving billions of dollars, millions of dollars.
02:06:21.500 --> 02:06:27.500
So I think that there is a self-interest there that was never revealed, and I think that that's part of the problem.
02:06:27.500 --> 02:06:35.500
You said Peter Dazzack was running eco-health, but he's still running it, being paid half a million dollars.
02:06:35.500 --> 02:06:37.500
Yeah, they had to talk to people about this.
02:06:37.500 --> 02:06:46.500
He won't reveal his notes. So the Lancet Commission, when they felt that he had taken advantage of them, they started a commission, the Lancet Commission to look into this.
02:06:46.500 --> 02:06:53.500
And Jeffrey Sachs was in charge of this. He initially had Peter Dazzack on the committee until he discovered how dishonest he was being with things.
02:06:53.500 --> 02:06:59.500
But Peter Dazzack has refused to reveal his notes. Ultimately, there is a great deal of culpability on his part.
02:06:59.500 --> 02:07:05.500
And to give you an example of who he is and how the money changes hand, he was like, oh, I'm going to cure the world from cancer of this disease.
02:07:05.500 --> 02:07:14.500
Now, this is a guy who has $15,000 cocktail parties at the Cosmo Club, NDC, invites Anthony Fauci and others there for cocktails.
02:07:15.500 --> 02:07:19.500
This is a guy who's been schmoozing, you know, how some people schmooze politicians.
02:07:19.500 --> 02:07:23.500
Their whole organization is now set up to schmooze bureaucrats.
02:07:23.500 --> 02:07:27.500
And part of the problem that made it worse, Anthony Fauci was there for 40 years.
02:07:27.500 --> 02:07:30.500
Anthony Fauci became the J. Edgar Hoover of the NIH.
02:07:30.500 --> 02:07:33.500
Too much power, too much longevity.
02:07:33.500 --> 02:07:41.500
And it was also greatly expanded after 9-11 because they got involved with bio-weapons and a huge amount of defense money started flowing in.
02:07:41.500 --> 02:07:44.500
So Anthony Fauci used to be 127th of the NIH.
02:07:44.500 --> 02:07:51.500
He became so big and so powerful that it became more powerful than the head of all of NIH, but billions of dollars flowed through him.
02:07:51.500 --> 02:07:53.500
And we're still scratching the surface.
02:07:53.500 --> 02:08:00.500
So we're actually could reference that, right? We could go right back to the paper that we were reading at the beginning.
02:08:00.500 --> 02:08:07.500
And we can look at this.
02:08:07.500 --> 02:08:10.500
Oops.
02:08:10.500 --> 02:08:23.500
This idea, this odd perception, this odd effect that perception has on demand is best illustrated by the funding trends for vaccine development following the events of September 11, 2001.
02:08:23.500 --> 02:08:36.500
Now, I don't know why they cite September 11 because vaccine developments following the events of September 11 events must refer to the anthrax attacks that came after as if they're all related, which I don't think that they necessarily are in the way that it is.
02:08:37.500 --> 02:08:50.500
Concerns about bioterror have amplified public demand for vaccines against pathogens for which the actual risk of illness and exposure is minute amplified the public demand.
02:08:50.500 --> 02:08:54.500
Is that a story they're telling or is that real? It's probably a story.
02:08:54.500 --> 02:09:05.500
Nevertheless, bioterrorism in several years of sustained increases in government funding have had a stimulatory effect on vaccine development aids has also driven vaccine research.
02:09:05.500 --> 02:09:17.500
Now, it's interesting that we hear Rand Paul telling almost the exact same story 23 years later.
02:09:17.500 --> 02:09:21.500
Oh, I sorry, 20 years later. This is a 2004 paper.
02:09:21.500 --> 02:09:28.500
20 years later, he's selling the same story about where the funding's coming from, why it's coming from there.
02:09:28.500 --> 02:09:40.500
And its effects are that there is a giant amount of money and a giant amount of power pent up behind this experimental.
02:09:40.500 --> 02:09:48.500
Emergency plan coordinate a response to a pandemic.
02:09:48.500 --> 02:09:57.500
So the question becomes, would these powers that stand to gain money and power and prestige and everything from a pandemic?
02:09:57.500 --> 02:10:11.500
Would there be any national security imperative to actually make sure that that event, that black swan event occurred completely under their control?
02:10:11.500 --> 02:10:20.500
So that it would be a successful response perceived as a successful response and achieve the outcomes that were desired,
02:10:20.500 --> 02:10:34.500
which might be, for example, to normalize the use of transfection as a therapeutic even before it has been or ever tested under the guise of an investigational vaccine,
02:10:34.500 --> 02:10:46.500
exactly described as in this editorial from 2004 by one of the leaders inside of the NIH at the time and still.
02:10:47.500 --> 02:10:51.500
Just saying a lot of things are lining up here.
02:10:51.500 --> 02:10:53.500
A lot of things are lining up.
02:10:53.500 --> 02:10:57.500
The purpose is for us trying to determine the classified stuff that's going on.
02:10:57.500 --> 02:11:05.500
We're having trouble getting the unclassified information, but I think there's a great deal more if we can ever get into the classified projects that they're doing.
02:11:05.500 --> 02:11:10.500
Well, you eventually want the media trashed you all the way through.
02:11:10.500 --> 02:11:12.500
Rand Paul, stop it.
02:11:12.500 --> 02:11:13.500
You look like an idiot.
02:11:13.500 --> 02:11:16.500
But some now have changed vanity.
02:11:16.500 --> 02:11:17.500
Headline.
02:11:17.500 --> 02:11:18.500
That was pretty good.
02:11:18.500 --> 02:11:19.500
I didn't see that one before.
02:11:19.500 --> 02:11:22.500
To call Rand Paul the sniveling mora.
02:11:22.500 --> 02:11:26.500
Two months later, the headline is major shift.
02:11:26.500 --> 02:11:35.500
Now, is this any different than the shtick that we heard from Brett Weinstein yesterday, where people were writing bad reviews about his podcast being dangerous,
02:11:35.500 --> 02:11:40.500
and that people are criticizing him, that he might be a tool of Peter Thiel?
02:11:40.500 --> 02:11:42.500
Is this any different?
02:11:42.500 --> 02:11:46.500
It's the exact same shtick.
02:11:46.500 --> 02:11:59.500
They're all doing exactly the same act for their audience, for their constituents, for their followers, and the shtick is the same for all of them.
02:11:59.500 --> 02:12:04.500
Robert Malone does this shtick.
02:12:04.500 --> 02:12:10.500
Anybody that lost their job does this shtick, I was doing this shtick.
02:12:10.500 --> 02:12:30.500
But the point is, is that the people who are doing it with the most prominence and making the most gains and comfort from it are actually there artificially as part of a limited spectrum of debate and a lively discussion within it.
02:12:30.500 --> 02:12:47.500
It's all fake, and it's all designed to make sure that every single possible person on the planet that is skillfully watching television or skillfully using social media will come to the conclusion that there was a novel virus that killed millions of people,
02:12:47.500 --> 02:12:56.500
that we also saved millions of people from, that likely originated and gained a function research and therefore a virus like it will come again in the future.
02:12:56.500 --> 02:13:08.500
This is the narrative, the spell, the enchantment that they are casting on the planet with the intention of raising your children's children under this mythology.
02:13:08.500 --> 02:13:10.500
Plain and simple.
02:13:10.500 --> 02:13:21.500
No more Santa Claus, no more religion, we're going to use mother nature and biology and myths about it.
02:13:21.500 --> 02:13:37.500
Not your sacred biology, not your body is a temple, not your perfect at birth, but that you're darn lucky to have public health or otherwise you'd all be dead.
02:13:37.500 --> 02:13:41.500
Admits funding, risky research and woo-huh.
02:13:41.500 --> 02:13:43.500
Paul might have been on to something.
02:13:43.500 --> 02:13:50.500
Yeah, I think that ultimately they're going to have to admit to this, but to me it's not so much about them admitting or apologizing or their culpability.
02:13:50.500 --> 02:13:53.500
It's really about trying to prevent this from happening again in the future.
02:13:53.500 --> 02:13:59.500
I mean the big goal for me is some sort of bipartisan legislation that will prevent this from happening again.
02:13:59.500 --> 02:14:01.500
Did you write this book by yourself?
02:14:01.500 --> 02:14:12.500
Well, I had some help from my wife and so what I usually say is it was a big, huge, maybe not that interesting book and then my wife, Kelly, got a hold of it and added a lot of interesting color to the book.
02:14:12.500 --> 02:14:17.500
971 footnotes, given all the stupid stuff you have to do as a politician.
02:14:17.500 --> 02:14:18.500
Yeah.
02:14:18.500 --> 02:14:22.500
I can't believe you have the time to read 900 sources.
02:14:22.500 --> 02:14:28.500
I got really intrigued by this when I saw the very first conversations on January 31st of Anthony Fauci.
02:14:28.500 --> 02:14:31.500
He sends emails back and forth till three in the morning.
02:14:31.500 --> 02:14:36.500
He's obviously petrified that it's going to come out that he funded this time.
02:14:36.500 --> 02:14:37.500
Wow.
02:14:37.500 --> 02:14:41.500
And so those emails intrigued me because we see all the way through till three in the morning.
02:14:41.500 --> 02:14:44.500
The last email at three in the morning is to a guy named Bob Cadlak.
02:14:44.500 --> 02:14:46.500
I didn't know who that was at first.
02:14:46.500 --> 02:14:54.500
But I discovered in doing the research for this book that Bob Cadlak who receives an email at three in the morning, he's head of the safety committee that's supposed to oversee this research.
02:14:55.500 --> 02:15:05.500
So why is Anthony Fauci emailing him at three in the morning saying nothing to see here probably came from animals because he knows that Bob Cadlak's committee should have reviewed this.
02:15:05.500 --> 02:15:11.500
And the only reason they didn't is because Anthony Fauci prevented this research from getting the proper safety review.
02:15:11.500 --> 02:15:13.500
Thank you, Senator Paul.
02:15:13.500 --> 02:15:14.500
Thanks for having me.
02:15:14.500 --> 02:15:16.500
Wow.
02:15:16.500 --> 02:15:18.500
Thanks for watching this video.
02:15:18.500 --> 02:15:24.500
I'm not really sure what to say other than that's a very, very impressive summary of the Scooby-Doo.
02:15:24.500 --> 02:15:28.500
A very impressive commitment to the Scooby-Doo.
02:15:28.500 --> 02:15:35.500
And I'm kind of frightened by the fact that he was so committed to the Scooby-Doo.
02:15:35.500 --> 02:15:38.500
So let me just wrap it up real quick.
02:15:38.500 --> 02:15:45.500
Oh, shoot.
02:15:45.500 --> 02:15:54.500
Let me just wrap it up really quick here, guys.
02:15:54.500 --> 02:16:14.500
So there's an illusion of consensus that's been created by the television and by social media that we had to figure out whether this was a lab leak of a batcave zoneosis virus or a batcave zoneosis or whether this was a lab leak of a batcave virus or, or whether it was a modified virus for that matter.
02:16:14.500 --> 02:16:19.500
And maybe the fear and cleavage site is the reason why it went around the earth so well for three years.
02:16:19.500 --> 02:16:38.500
Many people believe that the fear and cleavage site is the reason why this virus was so infectious and that it could start out in a point in Wuhan and spread around a planet, which is just not possible, an RNA molecule can't do that.
02:16:39.500 --> 02:16:55.500
Just like if I spill paint outside of my house, there's no possible way no matter how many people walk through my backyard, it's not possible to cover the earth and blue paint by dumping it in my backyard.
02:16:55.500 --> 02:17:00.500
Oh, but the RNA replicates with your own cells. It uses your own cells to copy.
02:17:00.500 --> 02:17:01.500
Yeah, right.
02:17:01.500 --> 02:17:05.500
And it can't make a single good copy of itself.
02:17:05.500 --> 02:17:15.500
Every copy has errors. Most of the time the RNA dependent RNA polymerase makes an incomplete sub genomic RNA copy.
02:17:15.500 --> 02:17:27.500
So much so that when they do a high fidelity nanopore sequencing experiment, they can only find a few, a handful of full genome sequences and the rest are fragmented.
02:17:27.500 --> 02:17:40.500
They have no explanation for it other than likely the vast majority of viral particles don't have a full genome in them, which is part of this quasi species swarm.
02:17:40.500 --> 02:17:55.500
This part of the fraction of that swarm that is incompetent replication incompetent exactly as none other than Robert Malone explained in June of 2021.
02:17:55.500 --> 02:18:07.500
This faith in a novel virus has not been tarnished by anyone has not been challenged by anyone except for the people that say there's no viruses at all that measles is made up.
02:18:07.500 --> 02:18:24.500
And the reason why is because this faith is the trap this faith is the faith that doesn't allow you to see that it's a conflated background signal that these tests don't test for anything that a pan coronavirus set of primers doesn't find anything.
02:18:24.500 --> 02:18:32.500
And the metagenomic sequencing doesn't find anything hasn't found anything but putting together signals.
02:18:32.500 --> 02:18:37.500
And the best example that I have for this is the library example.
02:18:37.500 --> 02:18:40.500
I've told this one before, but maybe I shouldn't tell it now.
02:18:40.500 --> 02:18:41.500
I won't tell it now.
02:18:41.500 --> 02:18:43.500
Protocols are murder and transfection.
02:18:43.500 --> 02:18:44.500
They're not medicine.
02:18:44.500 --> 02:18:46.500
Infectious colon release.
02:18:46.500 --> 02:18:47.500
You can call it that it's still the same.
02:18:47.500 --> 02:18:49.500
Protocols are murder and transfection is a medicine.
02:18:49.500 --> 02:19:03.500
It doesn't really matter what you call it as long as you realize that the signal that we're detecting with PC are testing the signal that they say they're getting when they culture this virus is most likely alive.
02:19:03.500 --> 02:19:06.500
Because of the way that they do it.
02:19:06.500 --> 02:19:09.500
It is most likely a lie.
02:19:09.500 --> 02:19:17.500
And it's a lie not because the signals aren't there but because the signals are a conflated background signal they're telling you they're finding something that isn't there.
02:19:17.500 --> 02:19:20.500
I want you to think of this example.
02:19:20.500 --> 02:19:23.500
I'm going to try to explain it and see if this works.
02:19:23.500 --> 02:19:25.500
Of course this wasn't right.
02:19:25.500 --> 02:19:26.500
This is the read.
02:19:26.500 --> 02:19:30.500
I hate that one but this one.
02:19:30.500 --> 02:19:41.500
Let's say that you sat down and we set you down on the couch and we say that well Jonathan Cooley wrote a book about Scooby Doo.
02:19:41.500 --> 02:19:44.500
And it's a book with 15 pages.
02:19:44.500 --> 02:19:45.500
It's pretty short.
02:19:45.500 --> 02:19:47.500
It's only got two chapters.
02:19:47.500 --> 02:19:51.500
It's a kid's book like a Dr. Seuss book but it's about Scooby Doo.
02:19:51.500 --> 02:20:01.500
And we're going to look in this library for it.
02:20:01.500 --> 02:20:07.500
And I'm going to prove to you that in the Pittsburgh Carnegie Library my Scooby Doo book is in there.
02:20:07.500 --> 02:20:20.500
But the way that we're going to look for it is we're going to use a random search engine to go look for pieces of my book in the library.
02:20:20.500 --> 02:20:27.500
And if we find three pieces of my book in the library then I've proven to you that my book is in the library.
02:20:27.500 --> 02:20:30.500
The pieces we're going to look for are once upon a time.
02:20:30.500 --> 02:20:33.500
The end.
02:20:33.500 --> 02:20:40.500
And suddenly a screen came from the hallway.
02:20:40.500 --> 02:20:43.500
Now those are all parts of my book.
02:20:43.500 --> 02:20:51.500
But if I tell you the story correctly or I make an argument to you correctly I could argue that those are unique to my book.
02:20:51.500 --> 02:21:01.500
So if you find these in the library I have proven to you that my book is in that library and now you owe me you know you lost the bet.
02:21:01.500 --> 02:21:15.500
And so if the coronavirus biology is like that and I suspect that it is that there are RNA and DNA signals in the background everywhere that include viruses and exosomes and whatever else noise that's there.
02:21:15.500 --> 02:21:26.500
So if you start to draw random small signals from that with particular patterns and then say that if enough of these show up that it's evidence of something you can find a lot of things down there.
02:21:26.500 --> 02:21:42.500
And that's exactly what Nathan wolf and metagenomic sequencing and metal biota did is that they said they were looking at the dark matter of life the noise and they were looking for new life forms in that that genetic noise.
02:21:42.500 --> 02:21:52.500
A genetic noise is a lot like a giant shredded library of genetic noise from which you can almost find anything in small quantities.
02:21:52.500 --> 02:22:00.500
Then it would be pretty easy to use a series of PCR reactions to claim that look I wrote a book it's in the library.
02:22:00.500 --> 02:22:15.500
There's a conflated background signal back there that's composed of RNA dependent RNA polymerases and end proteins and and e proteins and all kinds of other viral proteins that are related to RNA sequences or something like that.
02:22:15.500 --> 02:22:24.500
And if we use the light molecular techniques we can find once upon a time and the end and suddenly there was a scream in the hallway.
02:22:24.500 --> 02:22:33.500
That novel book that brand new book is there look that book wasn't there before well how do you know well we weren't testing for it so obviously it wasn't there.
02:22:33.500 --> 02:22:39.500
It's a brand new book in the library and it's traveling everywhere everywhere we look for it we find the book.
02:22:39.500 --> 02:22:41.500
Holy crap.
02:22:42.500 --> 02:22:54.500
Well we took the same test over to to England and we looked for once upon a time and the end and there was a scream in the hallway and we found those sentences so it was in it was in England too.
02:22:54.500 --> 02:22:57.500
Holy cow really did you look in India.
02:22:57.500 --> 02:23:05.500
Yeah we did and we found an English library there and lo and behold we found those sentences in that English library too.
02:23:06.500 --> 02:23:09.500
That book must be a best seller.
02:23:09.500 --> 02:23:16.500
It's the best selling book ever every freaking library we look in we find those sentences.
02:23:16.500 --> 02:23:26.500
Now it's not a perfect analogy but it's damn close because the genetic alphabet is actually only 20 words with a few synonyms.
02:23:26.500 --> 02:23:29.500
It's only composed of four letters.
02:23:30.500 --> 02:23:32.500
Every words only three letters.
02:23:32.500 --> 02:23:33.500
Uh oh.
02:23:34.500 --> 02:23:35.500
Uh oh.
02:23:35.500 --> 02:23:42.500
Is it now getting easier for you to imagine that you could conflate a background signal with the right testing.
02:23:42.500 --> 02:23:48.500
If the words are only three letters wrong and there's only four letters and there are only 20 possible words.
02:23:48.500 --> 02:23:50.500
Oh my gosh ladies and gentlemen.
02:23:51.500 --> 02:23:58.500
I think you're starting to understand why that conflated background signal might just be the source of this pandemic.
02:24:00.500 --> 02:24:07.500
It's faith in a novel virus ladies and gentlemen.
02:24:07.500 --> 02:24:08.500
It's faith in a novel virus.
02:24:08.500 --> 02:24:20.500
It's faith that that background signal is really a new source of death that's never existed before and spread around the world more rapidly than any mRNA ever in history.
02:24:20.500 --> 02:24:22.500
It's just ridiculous.
02:24:23.500 --> 02:24:30.500
Protocols were murder and transfection is not medicine and the players that won't play the game won't talk about the PCR fraud anymore.
02:24:30.500 --> 02:24:32.500
They won't talk about any of this stuff.
02:24:32.500 --> 02:24:35.500
Natural immunity, transfection in general.
02:24:35.500 --> 02:24:39.500
They got to talk about certain things but not in general.
02:24:39.500 --> 02:24:50.500
If we're going to talk to you about protein folding or the RNA not being pure or the death certificates being fraudulent because of massive financial fraud, not going to talk about any of this lying.
02:24:51.500 --> 02:24:59.500
They don't want to talk about it because then it dispels the idea of a novel virus that killed millions of people which is a tenant of the faith.
02:25:02.500 --> 02:25:07.500
And why are they doing this because we are at a time point when there won't be 10 billion humans forever.
02:25:09.500 --> 02:25:12.500
There won't be 10 billion humans having children forever.
02:25:13.500 --> 02:25:28.500
And so if we want to get that genetic data from these children while we still have enough of them to feed the AI lifetimes of data, then we've got to invert sovereignty of people right now so that they turn their kids data over to the government.
02:25:28.500 --> 02:25:36.500
It can't be this voluntary thing called all of us at the NIH where nobody's going to participate except for people that are paid.
02:25:37.500 --> 02:25:39.500
They want it to be mandatory.
02:25:40.500 --> 02:25:43.500
And first they're going to do it with money.
02:25:43.500 --> 02:25:49.500
First they're going to do it with scary viruses but eventually it's just going to be because you owe it to us.
02:25:50.500 --> 02:25:54.500
It's your duty to society to give your babies to us.
02:25:55.500 --> 02:25:56.500
The genetic data.
02:25:56.500 --> 02:25:57.500
Why are you so selfish?
02:25:58.500 --> 02:26:01.500
Stop all transfections and humans ladies and gentlemen.
02:26:01.500 --> 02:26:03.500
Stop all transfections full stop.
02:26:04.500 --> 02:26:06.500
I've stayed up way too late again.
02:26:06.500 --> 02:26:08.500
I wanted to be asleep when my wife was asleep tonight.
02:26:09.500 --> 02:26:10.500
That's really annoying.
02:26:10.500 --> 02:26:12.500
But it was good and I'm glad you guys stayed here.
02:26:13.500 --> 02:26:18.500
You know, they're trying to eliminate the control group by any means necessary so don't let them do it.
02:26:19.500 --> 02:26:20.500
Don't let them do it.
02:26:23.500 --> 02:26:29.500
Intramuscular injection of any combination of substances with the intent of augmenting the immune system is dumb and transfection and healthy animal.
02:26:30.500 --> 02:26:32.500
And healthy humans is criminally negligent.
02:26:33.500 --> 02:26:34.500
Thanks very much for joining me.
02:26:34.500 --> 02:26:35.500
I'll see you again tomorrow night.
02:27:02.500 --> 02:27:20.500
Don't forget I am not teasing J body about a charia I think is going to join us on Monday morning.
02:27:20.500 --> 02:27:27.500
So I'm probably going to do a live show on Monday morning which will actually I think be it's his morning.
02:27:28.500 --> 02:27:31.500
So it'll actually be about one o'clock in the afternoon on Monday.
02:27:31.500 --> 02:27:37.500
I'll throw it up on the schedule once I have confirmation from Jay that he's coming.
02:27:37.500 --> 02:27:38.500
I think it's going to be real nice.
02:27:38.500 --> 02:27:50.500
We have some good questions and of course we're going to take him as close as we can to questioning this mythology because he's an epidemiologist.
02:27:50.500 --> 02:28:06.500
And so he I think he stays safely on his little island and I think I have the right kind of relationship with him to be in the broken science initiative that I can I can make him test his border a little bit so we're going to take him to the woods shed.
