And it became very clear that the proposal of these additional functions of antibodies was really annoying to the people that I was trying to confirm it with.
And so it's a combination of outright lying and then also a giant amount of omission that makes it possible for these people to discuss augmenting the immune system in such simple terms.
The same kind of vaccines that when tested against the subunit vaccines with adjuvants were shown to be actually beneficial in ways besides causing immunity.
And she has shown that if you look at live attenuated vaccines versus dead subunit vaccines, live attenuated vaccines have an actual benefit on all cause mortality far and different than also protecting the child from the vaccine targeted disease itself.
It also seems to strengthen the immune system through general activation, whereas the application of adjuvanted subunit vaccines has an up to five times increase in all cause mortality in those children and no net benefit.
And so here he is saying that that all these vaccines that have worked before are against viruses that we already made a really good immune response to.
And so we could just weaken those viruses and it was all good, but now when we're talking about vaccinating against diseases like AIDS or chronic diseases like cancer.
Disease could also mean genetic disorders. Disease can mean now pivoting to genetic disorder means that, well, we're pivoting vaccines from diseases that we make an immune response to diseases of the genome.
And so I really think that you can see it's almost like a psychological game that they're playing so that you think that vaccines can target genes now because that just makes sense.
They're slipping genetic technologies in the back door of vaccine technology so that they can avoid all of the regular regulation of normal pharmaceuticals.
And so they have to bring transfection and transformation in through the vaccine door because otherwise it will face the full regulatory structure of any other pharmaceutical drug.
But 10 years later this concept has seeped into everyone's subconscious understanding to the point where people have become unable to to see the lie anymore.
If Robert Malone wanted you to know it was a transfection he could have used the word and he could have explained it and he could have grounded into the dirt on his nine podcasts per day but he never uses the word.
Just like when they say gender reveal party instead of sex reveal party they when they say gender reveal party it sounds it sounds better on your tongue but what it does is it's convincing you the gender is something.
You know the the big problem in vaccines has been that while it's been possible in the past to make vaccines against viruses that cause acute self limited infections.
That's mostly been done by making either an attenuated or killed virus which induces an immune response that mimics the immune response that you get to the natural infection because the natural infection will give you lifelong or at least long lasting immunity.
But now what's left are viruses that cause chronic infections or cancer that causes chronic disease where the disease itself does not induce an adequate response to get protection.
The reason why I watch that is because I want everybody to understand what the concerns are and I want everybody to understand what Kevin and his colleagues claim to have found there.
So we've interacted a lot and it was a pretty big disagreement about the significance of RNA infectious clones that resulted in Kevin McCurnan blocking me on Twitter.
And it's exceedingly odd that someone of his stature and sort of pedigree is wasting any time at all on Twitter talking to a guy who had less than 10,000 followers at the time and still rents his house.
It's actually quite disheartening to think that somebody who was at the time shaking a can on the Internet for his family and kids and had lost a career in academic biology was being insulted and dunked on quote unquote regularly
on Twitter by a guy who's worth tens if not hundreds of millions of dollars and has been successful since the early 90s on a national scale with regard to molecular biology and the human genome and sequencing and patenting and IP and you know
Yeah, I don't know what the equivalent of it is, but it's exceedingly odd seeing also as at one point in time he saw me as someone who was worthy of his time enough that he would actually come on to my stream and talk.
So I've had a long, long history with this gentleman and so when he wanted to communicate with the people that I'm working with now at Children's Health Defense, I definitely wanted them to understand the full breadth and depth of the problems with transfection and why
or at least how the DNA in the DNA signal that he's identified in some of these these vials could potentially be twisted around and used in such a way to make CHD fall on its face.
And so I think it's important that we understand that biology so that we see that this is just a long line of of things and it's not necessarily something his paper their results are not results that are rise to the level of significance that we can now go to the FDA and say look at Kevin's results
Their labs are not certified by the FDA in any way. We don't know if any of the equipment they use has been officially certified in any way so none of the results will ever be respected.
And it doesn't matter if Kevin McKernan has been a world-class molecular biologist for the last 30 years. There is in a court in the United States that will listen to that paper given the fact that again he claims to have gotten some of these vials in the mail from an anonymous source who just sent him to him when he asked for polyA RNA controls.
And so to make this an international story where Health Canada and all these other organizations are saying from the rooftops that these findings are real is really setting up almost anybody that gets on this bandwagon for a potential disaster.
Oh my gosh, you're such a dork. And that's what I think is very dangerous when you see somebody like Burke Halter come out and say these things because what did Burke Halter actually or Buck Halter actually say in the question and answer.
I'm going to play this video again because I think it's really important for you to hear that he would take a transfection if he could show that it didn't have any DNA in it.
And these two statements, I would submit, are evidence that he's not sophisticated enough in understanding the biology of the immune system or the potential consequences of transfection in order for him to give an opinion because he's apparently just a gene jockey
who's really good at PCR and sequencing because I think there are hundreds if not thousands of doctors immunologists, physiologists, biologists around the world who would agree with me the transfection and healthy mammals and healthy children and healthy adults
I know from talking to people in several conversations over the last few days that chain of custody actually means much more than just you know where it went.
The transport agency has to be certified by the FDA to carry it at temperature and the transport like cooler or whatever has to be certified and calibrated with a readout so that you can see what temperature the product was stored at for the entire time
that it was transported from the pharmacy to his lab and then his lab would need to be certified in such a way so that they could produce a similar time signature temperature thing.
There are some pretty significant hurdles that are in place in order to be sure that official things are official to the point where it's very hard to do things officially unless you're official.
But there are only certain labs that qualify as being capable of producing the results that the CDC and the FDA will respect and that's just the way it is.
And so unfortunately whether these guys know it or not, whether Kevin McCurnan or Philip here know it or not, what they're doing is only just the equivalent of a rumor.
The equivalent of hearsay and only with absolute surgical accuracy in terms of who you use, what laboratory you use, how they get the product and what tests they do on it, there's always going to be an out.
And this does not represent the dunk that everybody is trying to portray it as, that Steve Kirsch is trying to sell it as, that Robert Malone wants us to believe it is, that's all absolute nonsense for a list that does not fit on one page.
And listen again, it would be completely different if this guy was saying we shouldn't do it, we should have never done it, this is just crazy and this is the last, a long list of reasons and this is the latest one, but he's not saying that.
He's saying that I love this technology I think it works great I think it's going to work great on cancer I would give it to my parents even with this DNA in it.
But having said that I guess that they just didn't think about the hazard for genome modification because it's not all that expensive to add another process to get it out.
I don't rush too much and that's why I'm saying these subsequent you know we've heard testimony of these subsequent you know variant subsequent boosters etc etc are leading to maybe not scientific yet but at least collateral mileage that it apparently these things are causing death and disability later on and also the aging process which you heard about.
But that seems to me that before we can in South Carolina give this new vaccine world around here seems to me that our people ought to be able to look at that Mr. Chairman and see whether or not it's got this DNA and if it does fine tell everybody it's got the DNA and the problems associated there with.
Knowing what I know now about this I would still have recommended it to my elderly parents but I probably would not have given it to my daughters and I feel like my consent was not as informed as it should have been.
Can you imagine that trying to trying to soil my my professional reputation by calling people that I used to work with and say did you know that this guy is doing this.
Why in the world would this guy be so motivated to do that to somebody who is already blocked on Twitter and makes probably six figures more than I do every year.
That's it doesn't matter what's true that counts it matters what people think is true and that's what they are involved in they are involved in preserving the faith.
And that upscaling from nanograms to kilograms was predicted to be a source of huge problems already in 2020 and we were making fun of it as were many others including Michael Yeden and others.
The RNA was impure that means it was never making pure spike protein was making all kinds of fragments and those fragments can do any number of unknown things.
The RNA was code on optimized which is going to cause it to misfold and misfolding means you're not creating the epitopes that are created in the original antigen so it was all dumb to begin with.
They were never making a spike protein that would have been relevant and would have presented the relevant epitopes that are present on the regular spike maybe it makes neutralizing antibodies.
Whether you believe in viruses or RNA's viruses or not the the canon of how molecular biology works is that a code on optimized RNA will result in a differently fold differentially folded protein than one that uses the original code found in the purported RNA virus.
That is for sure and that misfolding results in the presentation of the formation of different epitopes because epitopes are not they're not just the string of amino acids but they are the amino acids as they are assembled in three dimensional space.
This chemically altered base causes premature stop codons which can result in fragmented small RNAs which can be interfering and they can interfere with endogenous RNAs they can interfere with micro RNAs they can themselves be micro RNAs.
All of which we have barely barely barely barely even have scratched the surface of understanding but we definitely know that those signals are there that they are regulatory and modulatory signals and they are important.
In addition to causing wobble based substitutions which is that this n-methyl pseudo uridine can pair with almost any other base and that makes it possible for other codons to be read.
The protein produces them therefore uncharacterized because of all of those things above therefore highly variable with countless unknown consequences.
And finally if the spike toxic is spike toxic itself is a question we have to ask provided that the spike is produced at all in quantities that matter and folding that matters.
I was pointed out to me by I believe Sana on Twitter that here at funded bush actually also came on to the scene right around the same time that Byron Bridal was becoming famous and going on radio shows.
So Robert Malone comes out of the off the bench and care funded bush comes off the bench in Europe because Byron Bridal put his whole career on the line because he found a document that didn't make sense.
You should find yourself in the back of your garage streaming for three years when you find out that everything you believed about public health was wrong.
We don't question that there were possibilities that people were saved by different things or could have more could have been saved by different choices.
He has been a lead longer than most. Before this theater ever became important and when it became important because of the movie Vaxxed and when it became important because of the pandemic he's always been one of the lead players.
So what to do? And so the decision that was made and really was in our decision was decision really made by the FDA and the in concert with the pharmaceutical companies was to instead of just using the Wuhan strain.
that you really got a neutralizing antibody response against VA one much greater than you would have gotten with Wuhan one alone, because that was the goal.
You know, it's, you know, I think in fairness, in fairness to the FDA and fairness to pharmaceutical companies, they thought this would be kind of the next step on the way to making better vaccines.
01:00:11.000 --> 01:00:15.000
Fair enough. But the good news is you can tell whether or not that was the right move.
01:00:15.000 --> 01:00:31.000
So what happened over the next few months is studies that were done by David Ho and Columbia or Dan Baruch and that Harvard looked at people who were inoculated either with the, the, this by valent vaccine is two in one vaccine or just amount of valent vaccine.
01:00:31.000 --> 01:00:37.000
Did they make a better neutralizing antibody response against VA four VA five and the answer was no.
01:00:38.000 --> 01:00:52.000
And then there have been three studies, clinical studies, two with VA one, a third with VA four VA five all by valent vaccines, all prospective, all controlled using a monovalent vaccine to see as the other vaccine.
01:00:52.000 --> 01:00:55.000
And there was no difference. That's okay.
01:00:55.000 --> 01:01:12.000
So here he's about to describe how after coming out and saying that the by valent vaccine wasn't necessarily better and he wasn't going to get it right away or that he objected to saying it was better or something like that.
01:01:12.000 --> 01:01:19.000
He was blamed for nobody taking the vaccine.
01:01:19.000 --> 01:01:22.000
Now I want you to see.
01:01:22.000 --> 01:01:26.000
I want you to see how clearly this is that.
01:01:26.000 --> 01:01:31.000
How clearly this is a controlled spectrum of debate.
01:01:31.000 --> 01:01:35.000
How he formulates a.
01:01:37.000 --> 01:01:40.000
A hypothetical situation of.
01:01:40.000 --> 01:01:43.000
Of dissent.
01:01:43.000 --> 01:01:47.000
And how people don't want to hear dissent.
01:01:47.000 --> 01:01:56.000
And then makes the argument that we need to be able to discuss these things if we're going to improve our public health.
01:01:56.000 --> 01:01:58.000
And so I.
01:01:58.000 --> 01:02:04.000
When trying to discuss these things and bring a dissenting opinion.
01:02:04.000 --> 01:02:08.000
Was hammered on and that's not fair.
01:02:09.000 --> 01:02:25.000
Just like Brett Weinstein says that he was censored because he put Robert Malone on his stream in June of 2021 and really didn't question or do anything controversial at all.
01:02:25.000 --> 01:02:32.000
We are talking about.
01:02:32.000 --> 01:02:40.000
The worst kind of liars because they are consistently engaged in telling you a story.
01:02:40.000 --> 01:02:47.000
That is based on a national security priority they rationalize it in their head.
01:02:47.000 --> 01:02:52.000
Because they feel they are part of a governing structure.
01:02:53.000 --> 01:03:00.000
Paul Offit has felt part of this governing structure for 20 years.
01:03:00.000 --> 01:03:03.000
Vaccines are not.
01:03:03.000 --> 01:03:06.000
Distributed because of need.
01:03:06.000 --> 01:03:12.000
According to Andy DeGroat and her supervisor at the National Cancer Institute.
01:03:12.000 --> 01:03:20.000
They are distributed by a perceived need.
01:03:20.000 --> 01:03:32.000
And Paul Offit's job is to sustain that perceived need for national security reasons.
01:03:32.000 --> 01:03:45.000
Brett Weinstein and the intellectual dark web were recruited in 2019 to sustain those ideas as a national security priority.
01:03:45.000 --> 01:03:53.000
The worst case scenario of a bio weapon lab leak and a billion people dying.
01:03:53.000 --> 01:04:03.000
Was necessary to be seated in order to accomplish what Paul Offit has been part of trying to accomplish for the last 20 years.
01:04:03.000 --> 01:04:06.000
To make sure that every child.
01:04:06.000 --> 01:04:10.000
That grows up in America to raise children.
01:04:10.000 --> 01:04:14.000
Believes that the vaccine schedule is 100% safe.
01:04:14.000 --> 01:04:26.000
100% necessary and unquestionably the best medical thing we've got going.
01:04:26.000 --> 01:04:31.000
This is nothing short of a game for all the marbles.
01:04:31.000 --> 01:04:35.000
And they intend to govern our children with public health.
01:04:35.000 --> 01:04:41.000
They intend to govern all of the futures children with public health.
01:04:41.000 --> 01:04:52.000
Not with national governments, not with parliaments, with public health.
01:04:52.000 --> 01:04:58.000
Local governments, national governments are going to do the things that don't matter anymore.
01:04:58.000 --> 01:05:07.000
And they're going to do them increasingly with less efficiency, more waste and less effectiveness.
01:05:07.000 --> 01:05:14.000
So that the only good governance we have is public health.
01:05:14.000 --> 01:05:24.000
So that our children believe that the only working apparatus is public health.
01:05:24.000 --> 01:05:27.000
It's coming.
01:05:27.000 --> 01:05:29.000
It's okay not to be right.
01:05:29.000 --> 01:05:31.000
Now boosters boosted.
01:05:31.000 --> 01:05:33.000
It just wasn't any better.
01:05:33.000 --> 01:05:40.000
I think what was hard for me was watching many of the public health arena saying it was better, saying it was much better.
01:05:40.000 --> 01:05:41.000
This is going to be much better.
01:05:41.000 --> 01:05:42.000
Definitely better.
01:05:42.000 --> 01:05:44.000
So you should get it for that reason.
01:05:44.000 --> 01:05:46.000
And so I took a contrary point of view.
01:05:46.000 --> 01:05:54.000
I did what scientists normally do, which is I submitted a perspective piece to the New England Journal of Medicine, which was published, which is to say in order to get it published, it has to be reviewed.
01:05:54.000 --> 01:06:00.000
So I wasn't the only one that had this point of view, obviously, people that read that also had that point of view.
01:06:00.000 --> 01:06:09.000
But when I got up, and I think that the sort of the moment for me, the crystallizing moment was I was, because I was on CNN, a fair amount because I was on the FDA vaccine advisory committee.
01:06:10.000 --> 01:06:12.000
I was asked by Pamela Brown this question.
01:06:12.000 --> 01:06:23.000
First, she showed a clip of a public health official who was the coronavirus response coordinator at the White House saying this is a much better vaccine.
01:06:23.000 --> 01:06:27.000
And that's why you need to get it. And so they then shifted to me and said, is he wrong?
01:06:27.000 --> 01:06:29.000
Pamela Brown said, is he wrong?
01:06:29.000 --> 01:06:31.000
And so you don't want to make it personal.
01:06:32.000 --> 01:06:39.000
So I said, well, here are two papers that were just published in the New England Journal of Medicine that showed it doesn't appear to be any better, no worse, but not better.
01:06:39.000 --> 01:06:41.000
And I was hammered for that, hammered.
01:06:41.000 --> 01:06:54.000
I mean, I got, there were two very prominent bloggers, one a cardiologist, another one an epidemiologist who basically said that what I had done is I had had frightened the American public about this vaccine.
01:06:55.000 --> 01:07:06.000
Because of me, the uptake was low last year, only one in five Americans who were asked to get that vaccine, which is everybody over six months of age, actually got it. And that was in part my fault.
01:07:06.000 --> 01:07:13.000
I mean, I got, you know, I got, I was in the places like the Daily Mail, Epic Times.
01:07:13.000 --> 01:07:15.000
I mean, that's when you know you're losing.
01:07:15.000 --> 01:07:20.000
And, you know, they basically said that I said that this vaccine wasn't any good, which isn't what I said.
01:07:20.000 --> 01:07:31.000
So I think the minute you weigh in on this, by definition, whenever you weigh in on the media anyway, you could be misinterpreted. But here, because we were so divisive, you're either on one side or another.
01:07:31.000 --> 01:07:35.000
When I appeared to be not clearly stating what the public health group.
01:07:35.000 --> 01:07:39.000
So what you have to see here is that he's complaining of censorship.
01:07:39.000 --> 01:07:45.000
But what actually happened was his message got amplified.
01:07:45.000 --> 01:07:50.000
Just like Robert Malone complained about censorship, but there was none.
01:07:50.000 --> 01:07:53.000
His message got amplified by the censorship.
01:07:53.000 --> 01:08:00.000
Just like Alex Berenson complains about censorship, but actually his message has always been amplified.
01:08:00.000 --> 01:08:03.000
It's a lie.
01:08:03.000 --> 01:08:11.000
It is the actual spectrum of debate that they want to maintain.
01:08:11.000 --> 01:08:13.000
And that's why they amplified.
01:08:13.000 --> 01:08:20.000
He thinks that, oh, I was on the Epoch Times, but that's exactly how they do it.
01:08:20.000 --> 01:08:28.000
Jonathan, Jonathan Cooey is this cord is starting to drop out one of my ears and that's annoying.
01:08:28.000 --> 01:08:31.000
Wow.
01:08:31.000 --> 01:08:37.000
Jonathan Cooey is not making it to the Epoch Times because he's being censored.
01:08:37.000 --> 01:08:43.000
Jonathan Cooey isn't covered on the Daily Beast because he's being censored.
01:08:43.000 --> 01:08:46.000
But Paul Offit gets covered on the Daily Beast.
01:08:46.000 --> 01:08:48.000
Paul Offit gets covered on the Blaze.
01:08:48.000 --> 01:08:54.000
Paul Offit gets covered on the Epoch Times.
01:08:54.000 --> 01:08:57.000
So it's not really censorship.
01:08:57.000 --> 01:09:01.000
It's amplification.
01:09:01.000 --> 01:09:14.000
And once you start to see that almost all of these people that have complained about censorship have actually been amplified have benefited from their censorship.
01:09:14.000 --> 01:09:18.000
Whereas just look at the count.
01:09:18.000 --> 01:09:21.000
I still have less than 4,000 subscribers on YouTube.
01:09:21.000 --> 01:09:24.000
I still have less than 3,000 subscribers on Twitch.
01:09:24.000 --> 01:09:28.000
I still have less than 15,000 followers on Twitter.
01:09:29.000 --> 01:09:45.000
While some of these really average mediocre, you know, personalities on Twitter or personalities on YouTube or personalities on Twitch have 10 times as many followers.
01:09:45.000 --> 01:09:51.000
And don't put out the kind of consistent quality of information that's found on Giggle.
01:09:51.000 --> 01:09:56.000
Not even close.
01:09:56.000 --> 01:09:58.000
You can't make this stream go viral.
01:09:58.000 --> 01:10:00.000
You can't make this material go viral.
01:10:00.000 --> 01:10:03.000
You can't make my Twitter account go viral.
01:10:03.000 --> 01:10:10.000
But if you start sharing Paul Offit stuff, your tweets will go bananas.
01:10:10.000 --> 01:10:18.000
Because the algorithm wants to amplify the limited spectrum of debate within which we are all trapped.
01:10:18.000 --> 01:10:23.000
And Paul Offit is a definer of that debate.
01:10:23.000 --> 01:10:26.000
Which groups were stating that I had gone to the other side.
01:10:26.000 --> 01:10:33.000
I mean, I got love letters from from anti vaccine activists saying that things like they have been praying for me for years.
01:10:33.000 --> 01:10:36.000
And now it's good to see that I have finally come over to their side.
01:10:36.000 --> 01:10:38.000
I mean, I was asked to be on Newsmax.
01:10:38.000 --> 01:10:42.000
When that happens, by the way, you know that your message isn't getting out there.
01:10:42.000 --> 01:10:46.000
And that was that was last year's lesson. So, so what's the answer?
01:10:46.000 --> 01:10:58.000
Do you do you say nothing? Because when you say something, you're going to be misinterpreted. When you say something, you are going to be in open in many way, I'm invigorating anti vaccine activists. And when you say something.
01:10:58.000 --> 01:11:06.000
Jolie interview was rebroadcast on rents radio in his online show in its entirety or just the part about the string theory.
01:11:06.000 --> 01:11:26.000
Because for the first time in the history of my stream, somebody came on my show and had a visual aid and that visual aid ended up turning into a video that was produced by somebody I don't know with titles and with a little headshot of mine.
01:11:26.000 --> 01:11:33.000
And they tried to make it go as viral as they possibly could. No one's ever tried to do that before.
01:11:33.000 --> 01:11:44.000
No one. Not any. No one. All of the clips that my good friend Jeff from Earth has made. Not one person has ever tried to make one of those clips go viral.
01:11:44.000 --> 01:11:55.000
I've never seen any of those people that I saw make that clip of Jolie try to go viral. I've never seen them try to make any other of my shows ever go viral.
01:11:55.000 --> 01:12:05.000
I've never seen them make another clip of any of my work ever. Not of Denny's show, not of Michael's show, not of anyone's show ever.
01:12:05.000 --> 01:12:17.000
Do you hear that? Do you hear it? That means something. It should mean something to you.
01:12:17.000 --> 01:12:32.000
It shouldn't be a good sign. Because the best part of my talk is the any combination of substances injected intramuscularly with the intent of augmenting the immune system is dumb.
01:12:32.000 --> 01:12:45.000
They've never made a clip of that. One of my most important clips is when I'm teaching infectious clones using the cassette tape and CD analogy.
01:12:45.000 --> 01:12:52.000
No one's ever made a clip of that except for Jeff and maybe one of my friends from Germany.
01:12:52.000 --> 01:12:59.000
But man did they come out of the woodwork for Jolie.
01:12:59.000 --> 01:13:04.000
I'm not making any accusations. I'm not making any statements. I just want you to see what I see.
01:13:04.000 --> 01:13:09.000
And I don't see like, oh my goodness, finally somebody's paying attention to me.
01:13:09.000 --> 01:13:14.000
What I see is, oh somebody's paying attention to Jolie when he was on my stream.
01:13:14.000 --> 01:13:19.000
And they specifically titled it Watch Jolie Teach J.
01:13:19.000 --> 01:13:27.000
So were they promoting me or they were promoting Jolie? Were they promoting my ideas and the biology that I teach?
01:13:27.000 --> 01:13:33.000
Or were they teaching the biology and promoting the biology that Jolie teaches?
01:13:33.000 --> 01:13:38.000
That's what I see.
01:13:38.000 --> 01:13:42.000
Call me paranoid, but you know that's how we're going to win.
01:13:42.000 --> 01:13:50.000
Because it's so divisive divided. You're going to be seen as just confusing the American public because now it looks like we don't know what we're doing, right?
01:13:50.000 --> 01:13:53.000
This person says this, the other person says that, but I don't know.
01:13:53.000 --> 01:13:59.000
My feeling on this is just tell the truth as you see it and because there are people who are going to appreciate that.
01:13:59.000 --> 01:14:04.000
And I think that's the way to do it, but I could be wrong. What do you think?
01:14:04.000 --> 01:14:08.000
Well, what do you think the public health officials should have done?
01:14:08.000 --> 01:14:16.000
Instead of saying this vaccine is better, should they have said, for example, we think it's better?
01:14:16.000 --> 01:14:20.000
Let's try it. What do you think they should have done?
01:14:20.000 --> 01:14:24.000
Yes, this is what we're doing. It's just tell the whole story.
01:14:24.000 --> 01:14:26.000
We, Omicron has come into the United States.
01:14:26.000 --> 01:14:30.000
Tell the whole story. Omicron has come into the United States.
01:14:34.000 --> 01:14:41.000
We need to start getting away from Wuhan. Well, but we don't want to get away from it immediately, which is what they're thinking was.
01:14:41.000 --> 01:14:57.000
So there it is. The whole faith right there in a nutshell. Now, make sure that you realize that what I am suggesting to you is where did I put it?
01:14:57.000 --> 01:15:07.000
That he's not telling the whole story, right? If he was telling the whole story, oh, you demon.
01:15:07.000 --> 01:15:19.000
If he was telling the whole story, he might start maybe somewhere like this with a statement about why vaccines exist.
01:15:19.000 --> 01:15:24.000
The market for vaccines is driven by perception, not by actual need.
01:15:24.000 --> 01:15:31.000
Maybe you should start with that truth that Annie DeGroat gave us back in 2004.
01:15:31.000 --> 01:15:46.000
But he won't, of course, because again, this is a limited spectrum of debate, and it is a limited spectrum of debate that is bordered on all sides by a spectacular commitment to lies.
01:15:46.000 --> 01:15:56.000
And so that limited spectrum of debate right now is limited to a novel virus that has pandemicked around the world for the last three years, a whole recent version of which was called Omicron.
01:15:56.000 --> 01:15:59.000
That's what this is right here, what you're listening to.
01:15:59.000 --> 01:16:04.000
So let's try this measure and see whether or not this is better.
01:16:04.000 --> 01:16:12.000
And then as data starts to roll out, they can say, well, I think we've learned a lesson here, a lesson that we will apply to future vaccines, which is what happened.
01:16:12.000 --> 01:16:22.000
So in the following year, I this year, we don't, we no longer tether our vaccine to the Wuhan one strain. So what did you learn as you go, such as the nature of science, our eyes are open.
01:16:22.000 --> 01:16:32.000
We're going to keep monitoring data. The good news is this boosters do boost this does boost. It looks like it boosts the same degree that the original strain did certainly no worse.
01:16:32.000 --> 01:16:35.000
It's important to get this vaccine in these groups for these reasons.
01:16:35.000 --> 01:16:50.000
We will keep you posted as we continue to learn as we continue to have our eyes open. We will keep you posted in the most straightforward, honest way we can, knowing that there was a group of people in this country who will just cure you for doing that.
01:16:50.000 --> 01:17:08.000
So historically, you, you know, the history of public health and vaccination. Has this always been like this or were so what we always were always this divide between the science and the public health statement or was it better at one point.
01:17:09.000 --> 01:17:16.000
It was much, much better at one point. And I, here's the example I would use. There we go. In 1955.
01:17:16.000 --> 01:17:18.000
Five companies that were going to make Jonas Salk.
01:17:18.000 --> 01:17:29.000
One of them made it particularly badly. So what Jonas Salk did took polio, grew it up in cell culture, purified it, killed it with the inactivating agent formaldehyde.
01:17:29.000 --> 01:17:34.000
One company made it badly. They failed to inactivate the virus as a consequence.
01:17:35.000 --> 01:17:43.000
The first and second graders in this country were inoculated with live fully virulent polio virus thinking it was the polio vaccine.
01:17:43.000 --> 01:17:48.000
40,000 developed a board of polio, meaning short live temporary paralysis.
01:17:48.000 --> 01:17:53.000
168 people, mostly children were permanently paralyzed and 10 were killed.
01:17:53.000 --> 01:17:56.000
I think it was the worst biological disaster in this country's history.
01:17:56.000 --> 01:18:06.000
Now that went to court and the first trial was a trial of a little girl, actually, who's still alive, although suffering named and got stanker got stanker V cutter laboratories.
01:18:06.000 --> 01:18:13.000
And what they did was the they presented all the data and what you saw was you saw that it wasn't only cutter that had a problem.
01:18:13.000 --> 01:18:19.000
Why also had a problem in activating the virus and also made a vaccine that at least with one lot paralyzed and killed.
01:18:20.000 --> 01:18:27.000
And then the other three companies all had trouble in activating the virus. It was a filtration problem. It was a mass production problem.
01:18:27.000 --> 01:18:34.000
And I think that the jurors understood that the jurors wanted to find cutter not liable.
01:18:34.000 --> 01:18:39.000
They wanted to find them not guilty because they saw it for what it was. They saw it as a process of evolution.
01:18:39.000 --> 01:18:46.000
If it was a directed verdict, basically the judge said if you find that this vaccine did cause paralysis, you have to find them guilty.
01:18:46.000 --> 01:18:53.000
But if you listen to the voices in those exit interviews, those people, they trusted the government. They trusted the pharmaceutical companies.
01:18:53.000 --> 01:19:00.000
They trusted the public health agencies to get it right. And then they saw it for what it was, which was a process of evolution.
01:19:00.000 --> 01:19:05.000
And then the polio program was suspended for a couple of months and went back online and people trusted that.
01:19:05.000 --> 01:19:09.000
That would never happen today. It's a much more divided time.
01:19:10.000 --> 01:19:19.000
And I think what makes it so hard today are two things. I think one is social media, which is just a great place for awful and good information.
01:19:19.000 --> 01:19:27.000
And I think also just the political environment of conspiracy theory has sort of risen to the mainstream.
01:19:27.000 --> 01:19:31.000
So recently, you have been critical of the.
01:19:31.000 --> 01:19:39.000
I think I missed it. So I want to go back a little bit because somewhere in there, he says that the problem with the shots was actually upscaling their manufacturing.
01:19:39.000 --> 01:19:46.000
People, mostly children, were permanently paralyzed and 10 were killed. I think it was the worst biological disaster in this country's history.
01:19:46.000 --> 01:19:54.000
Now that went to court. And the first trial was a trial of a little girl, actually, who's still alive, although suffering named in Gottsanker.
01:19:55.000 --> 01:20:03.000
V cutter laboratories. And what they did was they presented all the data. And what you saw was you saw that it wasn't only cutter that had a problem.
01:20:03.000 --> 01:20:10.000
Why also had a problem in activating the virus and also made a vaccine that at least with one lot paralyzed and killed.
01:20:10.000 --> 01:20:17.000
And then the other three companies all had trouble in activating the virus. It was a filtration problem. It was a mass production problem.
01:20:17.000 --> 01:20:28.000
So a mass production problem that I guess Paul has never really thought about from the perspective of the mass production of the MRNA.
01:20:28.000 --> 01:20:39.000
And you can almost see here, and I hope you can, where we might have two threads on both sides of the controlled sphere of debate.
01:20:40.000 --> 01:20:46.000
Honing in on this idea that mass production can result in quality control issues.
01:20:46.000 --> 01:20:55.000
And so my spidey senses tell me that he might even be trying to lay this narrative down on that side of the field.
01:20:55.000 --> 01:21:03.000
That the cutter incident was a case of manufacturing and quality control.
01:21:03.000 --> 01:21:08.000
And when they tried to upscale the manufacturer, it was a filtration problem.
01:21:08.000 --> 01:21:21.000
It doesn't sound that dissimilar to getting rid of the DNA, how it was described by Phillip Buckholts as being just another step they could have added.
01:21:21.000 --> 01:21:42.000
And so if my gut feeling is right here, there is a absolutely malevolent plan to just like the lab leak story to fool both sides of the seesaw into thinking that the worst case scenario was a lab leak and it may have happened.
01:21:43.000 --> 01:21:52.000
We now may be trying to fool both sides of the seesaw that well, there were a lot of, there were some side effects.
01:21:52.000 --> 01:22:07.000
But the side effects might have been because like the polio vaccine, when it was first scaled up, we had some manufacturing problems and we're just going to have to be honest about it and say that the next generation of these vaccines is going to be better.
01:22:08.000 --> 01:22:17.000
That's where they may be going with this and you need to be vigilant as all get out to be sure that they don't do this.
01:22:18.000 --> 01:22:24.000
Oh my gosh, do we need to be vigilant that they do not do this?
01:22:24.000 --> 01:22:36.000
Because this will fool my parents, this will fool my brother and it'll be the same thing as the masks and the other stuff where they'll say that we just got lucky.
01:22:37.000 --> 01:22:43.000
Even Sam Harris will say we got lucky with this virus, the next virus though, he won't get so lucky.
01:22:44.000 --> 01:22:48.000
It's coming ladies and gentlemen, it's coming.
01:22:48.000 --> 01:22:52.000
Oh, it's coming so rapidly, I can see it.
01:22:53.000 --> 01:22:56.000
I think that the jurors understood that.
01:22:56.000 --> 01:22:59.000
The jurors wanted to find Qatar not liable.
01:22:59.000 --> 01:23:03.000
They wanted to find them not guilty because they saw it for what it was.
01:23:03.000 --> 01:23:05.000
They saw it as a process of evolution.
01:23:05.000 --> 01:23:11.000
If it was a directed verdict, basically the judge said if you find that this vaccine did cause paralysis, you have to find them guilty.
01:23:11.000 --> 01:23:22.000
But if you listen to the voices in those exit interviews, those people, they trusted the government, they trusted the pharmaceutical companies, they trusted the public health agencies to get it right.
01:23:22.000 --> 01:23:31.000
And then they saw it for what it was, which was a process of evolution and then the polio program was suspended for a couple of months and went back online and people trusted that.
01:23:31.000 --> 01:23:35.000
That would never happen today. It's a much more divided time.
01:23:35.000 --> 01:23:37.000
And I think what makes it so hard today are two things.
01:23:37.000 --> 01:23:44.000
I think one is social media, which is just a great place for awful and good information.
01:23:44.000 --> 01:23:51.000
And I think also just the political environment of conspiracy theory has sort of risen to the mainstream.
01:23:52.000 --> 01:24:03.000
More recently, you have been critical of the the CDC recommendation that everyone over what six months of age get this new fall.
01:24:03.000 --> 01:24:07.000
COVID vaccine, right, the XBB dot one dot five.
01:24:07.000 --> 01:24:11.000
And the same thing has happened. You've been criticized for being critical, right?
01:24:11.000 --> 01:24:19.000
Right. And, you know, what's interesting is that, see, this is another to be a loss opportunity.
01:24:19.000 --> 01:24:28.000
Because many other countries, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Australia, three Scandinavian countries, the World Health Organization have taken a different tact.
01:24:28.000 --> 01:24:33.000
And that pact has been let's target high risk groups. So, so it wasn't my idea.
01:24:33.000 --> 01:24:41.000
I mean, I thought, so the question is, what's the best way to convince those at greatest risk of serious disease to get the vaccine.
01:24:41.000 --> 01:24:48.000
And my attitude is, tell people, okay, here's who's getting hospitalized. Here's who's dying. Here's why we need to vaccinate these groups.
01:24:48.000 --> 01:24:57.000
And that's the best way to get those groups vaccinated. But I think the public health officials here anyway, think that the best way to do it is to say everybody should get it.
01:24:57.000 --> 01:25:01.000
And I don't know who's right. I mean, maybe they're right. Maybe I'm right.
01:25:01.000 --> 01:25:06.000
Or maybe all these other countries here doing it that way, right? But again, hammered. That was when I was actually asked to be on Newsmax.
01:25:06.000 --> 01:25:16.000
I don't know if you've ever watched Newsmax. It's like a Saturday Night Live spoof of conservative television. I mean, it's just, it's out landishly to one side.
01:25:16.000 --> 01:25:21.000
And I think I really disappointed that when I went on there, because they thought I wasn't who they had imagined me to be.
01:25:21.000 --> 01:25:31.000
I mean, somehow I got moved into the category of a nay-saying doctor. When I don't think I'm that at all, I think I'm just trying to figure out what the best way is to do this.
01:25:31.000 --> 01:25:46.000
But again, if the reason that we're doing this, that we're saying everybody should get it, is because we are worried that by not doing that, that there are going to be certain groups who aren't going to get covered by private insurance, like someone who lives in the home of someone who's at that high risk.
01:25:46.000 --> 01:25:51.000
Or someone who works in nursing home. Then say that. Just say it. Be honest with the American public.
01:25:52.000 --> 01:26:03.000
Knowing that there's going to be people who will not understand what you're saying, who will be confused by what you're saying. But I think there are many people out there who will appreciate that honesty. I do think that.
01:26:03.000 --> 01:26:08.000
But again, I'm an Eagle season ticket holder, so I'm going to ridiculously optimistic person.
01:26:08.000 --> 01:26:19.000
Do you think when you question the science, do you think you're really encouraging anti-vaxxers, which is one of the things you've been accused of?
01:26:20.000 --> 01:26:32.000
I think it does seem to play out that way. I mean, only in that what you've done is you have not completely agreed with everything that's being said by public health agencies. And so to them, they see that fissure. They see that crack.
01:26:32.000 --> 01:26:48.000
And they say, aha, see these public health agencies don't know what they're talking about. And here's someone who's saying that. I mean, I got a letter from a pretty virulent anti-vaccine activist who said that she's been praying for me for years, me and my family for years, and now finally
01:26:48.000 --> 01:27:04.000
there's a contral. This is not a good thing. No, it's not good at all. Well, you know, if you look at some of the comments to your post here on beyond the noise, you can see right away people are just distrustful of CDC of FDA.
01:27:04.000 --> 01:27:15.000
You know, no matter what you say in your column, they still don't trust them. And so that's something that has to be fixed. And I don't know how to do that.
01:27:16.000 --> 01:27:38.000
I don't think it's terribly fixable. I think there's going to be a certain percentage of people who will always feel that way. And I guess, for me, the, I guess, the point, the flex point for that evolution was vaccines cause autism. So a paper was published late 1990s, claiming that, you know, the, the MMR, measles, mumps, rubella vaccine cause autism and to the credit of the public health agency to the credit of
01:27:38.000 --> 01:27:51.000
academicians, academicians, pediatricians, many studies were done, causing tens of millions of dollars to almost calls them a catamajicians, which I really think is a word we should all start using.
01:27:51.000 --> 01:28:04.000
I was using it on Twitter. I'm going to take credit for having made that up. I made that word up.
01:28:04.000 --> 01:28:19.000
I'm a catamajician. So it's like an academic, but I'm a magician, right? It's an academic edition. And I think it's really an adequate way to describe how these people wield science.
01:28:19.000 --> 01:28:28.000
They are snake oil salesman disguised as scientists. So they're catamajicians. And the academy has taught them to do it.
01:28:28.000 --> 01:28:40.000
I'm one of the few people that has gone all the way under the water of academia and tried my best to swim in that water.
01:28:40.000 --> 01:28:49.000
And the people that are in academia will say that the reason why I'm so salty about it is because I couldn't swim in it.
01:28:49.000 --> 01:29:03.000
But I will say, yes, I couldn't swim in it. But I think the reason why I couldn't swim in it is because the water of academia teaches you to be an academy magician, which is not a scientist.
01:29:03.000 --> 01:29:13.000
It's not a biologist. It's not an experimentalist. It's not someone who tests hypotheses, but it is someone who makes the sausage.
01:29:13.000 --> 01:29:32.000
And Paul Offit is somebody who makes the sausage. Paul Offit is somebody who really doesn't want you to know how the sausage is made. It's kind of like the pink slime that's in 70% of all the ground beef in America that the FDA and the USDA don't want you to know is in there.
01:29:33.000 --> 01:29:43.000
And the people that maintain that, well, it's there, but we don't talk about it. They're the same kind of people, the lookaway doctrine followed by these people.
01:29:43.000 --> 01:29:48.000
It's okay to lie to us because we are being governed by these lies.
01:29:48.000 --> 01:29:54.000
Just like it's okay to lie to your kids about Santa Claus, so they're going to be good.
01:29:54.000 --> 01:30:05.000
Just like it's okay to lie to your kids about the tooth fairy, just like it's okay to lie and fake it until you make it in America right now. It's okay to lie about vaccines.
01:30:05.000 --> 01:30:12.000
It's okay to lie about public health because lies are okay nowadays.
01:30:12.000 --> 01:30:21.000
And that's how you know that our civilization is being destroyed from the inside because I'm not a liar. I was never raised to be a liar.
01:30:21.000 --> 01:30:25.000
I was raised by liars.
01:30:25.000 --> 01:30:31.000
I've grown up in a culture of lying.
01:30:31.000 --> 01:30:39.000
And when I was a young man in high school and in college, I swam in that water too.
01:30:39.000 --> 01:30:44.000
But my biggest lie was having a fake ID.
01:30:44.000 --> 01:30:48.000
These are people who have faked it until they made it.
01:30:48.000 --> 01:30:58.000
Some of them are faking an entire field because faking it makes it.
01:30:58.000 --> 01:31:07.000
We need to wake up, ladies and gentlemen, because our children are being misled as long as we are not adequately opposing this.
01:31:07.000 --> 01:31:13.000
As long as we are not actively teaching our children to see this, they won't see it.
01:31:13.000 --> 01:31:18.000
And they won't know that we see it.
01:31:18.000 --> 01:31:27.000
We must teach our children this college kids right now are so vulnerable to this kind of nonsense.
01:31:27.000 --> 01:31:34.000
And because of social media and how it's fractured our dinner tables, our children are so vulnerable to this.
01:31:34.000 --> 01:31:40.000
You have to talk to your children every day about this.
01:31:40.000 --> 01:31:46.000
The only way we're going to win is we raise our children to not believe this mythology.
01:31:46.000 --> 01:31:53.000
That's the task at hand. It's not to convince your neighbors.
01:31:53.000 --> 01:32:00.000
The task at hand is not to necessarily get elected to your local council. That's a good idea too.
01:32:00.000 --> 01:32:06.000
The real task that everybody has is to teach our children not to trust these people.
01:32:06.000 --> 01:32:15.000
And more importantly, to understand the biology so that that mistrust is placed and objectively based.
01:32:15.000 --> 01:32:18.000
We don't want to replace one boogeyman with another one.
01:32:18.000 --> 01:32:25.000
We don't want to replace Santa Claus with with Paul Offit.
01:32:25.000 --> 01:32:36.000
We want to replace Paul Offit with the sacred biology that is our perfect children.
01:32:36.000 --> 01:32:40.000
Born perfect.
01:32:40.000 --> 01:32:43.000
That's not part of this man's philosophy.
01:32:43.000 --> 01:32:47.000
Answer that question. Are you more likely to get autism if you've gotten that vaccine or not?
01:32:47.000 --> 01:32:49.000
And that convinced most people.
01:32:49.000 --> 01:32:53.000
I mean, most parents are children with autism. We're convinced by that, but not all.
01:32:53.000 --> 01:32:59.000
So there's still a solid 10 to 15% that still hold on to that notion, even though it's clearly been shown not to be true.
01:32:59.000 --> 01:33:02.000
And I think that's the group that are the conspiracy theorists.
01:33:02.000 --> 01:33:05.000
And conspiracy theorists theory now is just part of the mainstream.
01:33:05.000 --> 01:33:09.000
I mean, you hear in theory responsible congressmen using the term deep state all the time.
01:33:09.000 --> 01:33:15.000
So it's that's what you're up against. That in social media makes this a very steep hill to climb.
01:33:15.000 --> 01:33:21.000
So what are you doing going forward, Paul? If you see another vaccine that doesn't scientifically make sense,
01:33:21.000 --> 01:33:26.000
are you going to speak out or is this tending to quiet you down?
01:33:26.000 --> 01:33:29.000
No, I think we just did that.
01:33:29.000 --> 01:33:34.000
With the maternal RSV vaccine, there are some questions about that vaccine.
01:33:34.000 --> 01:33:37.000
And I think although it is now a licensed product, it's not a recommended product.
01:33:37.000 --> 01:33:44.000
I think it's fair to say some of the questions and concerns that did come up in discussions both at the FDA vaccine
01:33:44.000 --> 01:33:48.000
to vice committee and the ACIP advisory committee.
01:33:48.000 --> 01:33:56.280
The
01:33:56.280 --> 01:34:04.000
And for understandable reasons, because the minute you really tell all and you show what science is, which is always a process of evolution.
01:34:04.000 --> 01:34:07.000
And you never know everything. And you are learning as you go.
01:34:07.000 --> 01:34:14.000
That is frightening to people because especially at the beginning of this pandemic, you know, when the virus was killing 2,000 people a day, 3,000 people a day,
01:34:14.000 --> 01:34:18.000
you want people to believe you know everything you need to know you don't.
01:34:18.000 --> 01:34:24.000
And we didn't. You didn't know about myocarditis as a rare consequence of the mRNA vaccine.
01:34:24.000 --> 01:34:27.000
This is evolution.
01:34:27.000 --> 01:34:30.000
And you never know everything. And you are learning as you go.
01:34:30.000 --> 01:34:38.000
That is frightening to people because especially at the beginning of this pandemic, you know, when the virus was killing 2,000 people a day, 3,000 people a day.
01:34:38.000 --> 01:34:41.000
You know everything.
01:34:41.000 --> 01:34:51.000
So that was a narrative reinforcing statement there, right? That was a faith testament because there was a novel virus for which we knew nothing that everybody was vulnerable to.
01:34:52.000 --> 01:35:03.000
Those are the subverses of that main tenant of the faith that there was a novel virus for which everybody was vulnerable and we knew nothing.
01:35:03.000 --> 01:35:09.000
It is so important that you hear that because that's what he's doing.
01:35:09.000 --> 01:35:15.000
You need to know when you don't. And we didn't. You didn't know about myocarditis as a rare consequence of the mRNA vaccine.
You didn't know about a severe clotting, including clotting the brain with the J&J Johnson and Johnson vaccine, which ultimately drove that vaccine off the market.
It's a magnificent psychological operation that is being done on us every time these two guys speak.
01:35:58.000 --> 01:36:07.000
And it's not so much as a scripted thing as it is something that Paul Offit has rehearsed for his entire career.
01:36:08.000 --> 01:36:19.000
And he's now just kind of shifted this shtick to fit the current parameters of the narrative that he's now defending with regard to the pandemic.
01:36:19.000 --> 01:36:27.000
Oh my goodness is this guy awful. Paul Offit.
01:36:27.000 --> 01:36:36.000
We haven't used that vaccine here since May. You learn as you go. It's always true. And I think we just have to make that clear that this is the beauty of science in many ways.
01:36:36.000 --> 01:36:42.000
It's open-mindedness. It's willingness to change as we learn as we go. And people just have trouble accepting that.
01:36:42.000 --> 01:36:50.000
I mean, Dr. Fauci has probably been the biggest target in all this as, for example, masking recommendations changed or other things changed.
01:36:50.000 --> 01:36:56.000
I think he was a victim of that learning as we go problem.
01:36:56.000 --> 01:37:06.000
It's always hard to combine science and public health, right? They have slightly different objectives and in a pandemic, it exacerbates the whole situation.
01:37:06.000 --> 01:37:18.000
This is not going to change anything soon, anytime soon, unfortunately, because as you said, this country is polarized and it's partly the Internet, partly politics and many other things as well.
01:37:18.000 --> 01:37:28.000
And all we can do is, as you have always said, let's look at the data. Let's make sure the data tell us what to do, or at least we follow them. I think that's the key.
01:37:28.000 --> 01:37:37.000
And tell the truth, as at least as you see it. I mean, I'm telling you who I see it. I may not be right, but I, you know, because you have to be true to yourself and trust it.
01:37:37.000 --> 01:37:50.000
I think in this section of the American public does appreciate seeing it as it is, which is a process of evolution and knowledge.
01:37:50.000 --> 01:38:04.000
You've made the perfect point. I think I got a pandemic. And I think I think I need to record a laugh track. I had one, but I was just using like a YouTube video in the background. I think I have to record it, get it on my board here.
01:38:04.000 --> 01:38:18.000
Because more than, more than, stop lying. I actually think a laugh track would be more useful. Maybe I should get a couple different ones. I'll see if I can get some from, from some good recordings. I think that's really important.
01:38:18.000 --> 01:38:36.000
Because going forward, we need to have more ammunition like that that makes it more fun to do this stuff because it is painful. It is really painful to listen to this nightly, even though I do think it is very necessary.
01:38:36.000 --> 01:38:48.000
Ladies and gentlemen, they who declared a pandemic of a dangerous novel virus said to be detectable by a nonspecific PCR test for RNA viruses applied to a low prevalence population and intentionally correlated with poor.
01:38:48.000 --> 01:39:01.000
Poor detrimental health protocols through financial incentives that enabled a larger percentage of all cause mortality than pneumonia and influenza to be prioritized as a national security threat composed of a vaccine preventable deaths.
01:39:01.000 --> 01:39:16.000
The US was ready with a plan to respond to a coronavirus pandemic and that plan is in motion. The NIAID may have funded an infectious clone that may or may not have been involved in the initial biological incident, but a natural coronavirus swarm cannot pandemic.
01:39:16.000 --> 01:39:31.000
Notice that I'm not out of breath. Notice that I'm not running out of breath after four words. And notice that when I suck in, you don't hear.
01:39:31.000 --> 01:39:38.000
All I can say is thank you, Lord. Thank you, Lord.
01:39:38.000 --> 01:39:46.000
The whole is a total surrender of individual sovereignty and enforcement of a global fundamental inversion from basic human rights to basic granted permissions.
01:39:46.000 --> 01:39:54.000
The way that they did this is with an illusion of consensus about pandemic potential in laboratories and bat caves.
01:39:54.000 --> 01:40:01.000
And this illusion of consensus included a worst case scenario being laboratory bio weapon.
01:40:01.000 --> 01:40:15.000
And so that narrative has been seeded since the very beginning of the pandemic because the worst case scenario is what gets everybody to be afraid. It gets everybody to move and it gets everybody to justify all of the crazy decisions that were made.
01:40:15.000 --> 01:40:18.000
It's cover.
01:40:18.000 --> 01:40:29.000
And this illusion of consensus can be summarized by this statement. There was a novel virus millions died and were saved gain a function is real and a virus will come again.
01:40:29.000 --> 01:40:46.000
When I say millions died and millions were saved, I mean exactly that. You don't need to have a particular explanation for what you mean by that statement as long as you mean that millions died of a virus and millions could have been saved or were saved depending on what you're talking about.
01:40:46.000 --> 01:40:53.000
The lockdowns save people, masking save people, closing the school save people, rolling out the mRNA save people.
01:40:53.000 --> 01:41:02.000
Ivermectin might have saved people using hydroxychloroquine might have saved more people, telling people to take vitamin D and zinc might have saved more people.
01:41:02.000 --> 01:41:05.000
This is the narrative.
01:41:05.000 --> 01:41:19.000
And the way that they pulled this off is to make the equivalence between excess deaths and the mystery virus from the very beginning by excluding the all cause mortality here visible in light blue and instead telling us the story with the red graph below.
01:41:19.000 --> 01:41:29.000
Never telling us that a huge portion of that red graph was actually composed of pneumonia that had never killed this many people in the history of the world.
01:41:29.000 --> 01:41:42.000
As is evidenced by this darker blue graph here year on year, staying way below 10,000 people per year and now skyrocketing during the pandemic to as many as triple.
01:41:42.000 --> 01:41:50.000
The reason why they're able to do this is because they don't do the math where they subtract all the mistakes they make like do not resuscitate orders and ventilators.
01:41:50.000 --> 01:42:06.000
The lack of antibiotic use, the poor use of steroids, the use of remdesivir all around the United States, opioid deaths not being adequately tallied and death certificate frauds caused by the financial incentives that were driven by the CDC directives.
01:42:07.000 --> 01:42:28.000
They also avoid doing this math by simply not talking about the PCR fraud, not talking about lateral flow test fraud, not talking about the variance in the sequences and not talking about all the limitations of coronavirus biology that have just been glossed over and instead replaced with a cartoon representation of the infectious cycle.
01:42:28.000 --> 01:42:45.000
And all of this has been done over years in preparation for this moment so that this mythology could be laid down around the world across languages and cultures so that all of the children in the world would come to believe it.
01:42:45.000 --> 01:42:55.000
Wow, doesn't that sound like a crazy statement to make? It's not. It's exactly what the plan is for all the children to believe it.
01:42:55.000 --> 01:43:01.000
And the illusion of consensus is going to make it happen if we do not fight it.
01:43:01.000 --> 01:43:21.000
The illusion of consensus that was laid down by people like Robert Malone and Steve Kirsch and Brett Weinstein and Peter Teal and Eric Weinstein and Carrot Fund and Bosch and Sasha Latipova and nurse Aaron and all these people who still haven't questioned the faith in the white text.
01:43:21.000 --> 01:43:33.000
It was laid down in 2019 already by rumors and by people in the background of the internet and on the worst corners of the internet and by people like Paul Catrell and George Webb
01:43:33.000 --> 01:43:52.000
and by people like in drastic like Jonathan Cooey in Pittsburgh who rode his bike and talked about a lab leak in February of 2020 and was driven to certainty by the kinds of things that he encountered on the internet and on Twitter in a group called drastic.
01:43:52.000 --> 01:44:08.000
And this narrative was perpetuated on TV and in social media on both sides of the equation, laboratory or zoonosis because that mystery solving exercise leads to an illusion of consensus about those pink letters.
01:44:08.000 --> 01:44:13.000
And it leads to an illusion of consensus about a Scooby-Doo mystery that needs solving.
01:44:13.000 --> 01:44:22.000
And that illusion of consensus misleads all of us into thinking that we don't know what's going on and therefore these mistakes were okay.
01:44:22.000 --> 01:44:30.000
These mistakes are understandable. These mistakes are apart. We can accept the apart. We don't even have to worry about these mistakes anymore.
01:44:30.000 --> 01:44:44.000
That's a lie because if we don't worry about these mistakes, then we will incorrectly attribute the damage that they caused to a mystery virus.
01:44:44.000 --> 01:45:01.000
And that is actually the goal of this illusion of consensus for you to attribute all of the pandemic disaster to a virus instead of to all of the orchestrated poor behavior in humans all around you.
01:45:01.000 --> 01:45:18.000
The orchestrated poor behavior that was caused by the illusion of consensus. And we can break it. If we break the faith, the faith is a lie. It was a consensus about a novel background signal that everybody should have done known was a novel background signal.
01:45:18.000 --> 01:45:26.000
You can call it an endemic coronavirus background signal. It still doesn't change the fact that the protocols were murder and transfection is not medicine.
01:45:26.000 --> 01:45:34.000
I think it's very likely that an infectious clone was released because of the ubiquitous nature of this methodology throughout RNA virology.
01:45:34.000 --> 01:45:37.000
It's the only way they did it.
01:45:37.000 --> 01:45:48.000
Interestingly, transfection is a word that still hasn't penetrated the mainstream media, even though it is at the root of this entire exercise.
01:45:48.000 --> 01:46:00.000
The people that are saying that there are no viruses were a trap. They always were a trap. If they take it personally because I say they're a trap, they just don't want to really think about the implications of what they've done for the last three years.
01:46:00.000 --> 01:46:10.000
It was a conflated background signal. The faith is a lie. And you can see it because they don't talk about these things. That's how they preserve the faith.
01:46:10.000 --> 01:46:23.000
They want our data. They want our kids data. And they want your kids to give it up gladly as an obligation to society. And we need to teach them that society has an obligation to them.
01:46:23.000 --> 01:46:29.000
Ladies and gentlemen, intramuscular injection of any combination of substances with the intent of augmenting the immune system is dumb.
01:46:29.000 --> 01:46:37.000
Transfection is not immunization. So please stop it in humans. They are trying to eliminate the control group by any means necessary.
01:46:37.000 --> 01:46:44.000
So don't let it happen. Ladies and gentlemen, do not let it happen.
01:46:44.000 --> 01:46:56.000
This is the control group here. We are a member of the control group here. That's right. This is the control group. Unbent, Transfect, Organic Free Range Human.
01:46:56.000 --> 01:47:01.000
And hopefully many of you are as well.
01:47:01.000 --> 01:47:12.000
If you're not an organic free range human, forgive yourself for having given into this and make sure that you get on our team because it's about health freedom in the future for our children.
01:47:12.000 --> 01:47:18.000
Our life is already for all practical purposes done. We're now trying to hand off the baton.
01:47:18.000 --> 01:47:26.000
And so let's start handing off the baton in the form of knowledge that can't be broken, biological knowledge that can't be squandered.
01:47:27.000 --> 01:47:35.000
I love you all very much. I got some bad news for you. It's possible I'm not going to be on all weekend and in preparation for my Halloween show.
01:47:35.000 --> 01:47:43.000
I may also show up. I don't know. But I'm not making any promises. This could be the end of the streak. Don't take it like I'm sick.
01:47:43.000 --> 01:47:50.000
Just take it like I'm trying to rest my voice a little bit for a four or five hour show on Halloween.
01:47:50.000 --> 01:47:54.000
So I want to play it safe and I also need to get that slide deck ready.
01:47:54.000 --> 01:48:01.000
I'm going to go on YouTube on Halloween if you haven't heard for a big comeback on YouTube on Halloween.
01:48:01.000 --> 01:48:08.000
I hope you will all join me for that. I'm really stoked about it. Like you can't imagine how long it's been waiting.
01:48:08.000 --> 01:48:13.000
So thank you very much for joining me. I don't know if I'm going to see you tomorrow or not. I might.
01:48:13.000 --> 01:48:18.000
But I don't know and I'm not making any promises. I love you all very much. Thanks for joining me. See you again.
